- Publisher: LucasArts
- Release Date: Nov 19, 2002
User Score
Generally favorable reviews- based on 56 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 40 out of 56
-
Mixed: 12 out of 56
-
Negative: 4 out of 56
Buy Now
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
Oct 24, 2013
-
Jul 22, 2017
-
JohnH.Apr 12, 2003Game sucks do not play this piece of crap.
-
-
Feb 12, 2020This game is still fun to play. I would rather play this than watch "The Mandalorian"..
-
GlennS.Feb 8, 2003My only complaint is that what's the point of getting all that money if u cant use it? Otherwise an awesome game.
-
-
ScottT.Apr 4, 2003Good fun and loads of action. Downside is the bugs Ive found which sometimes cause lock-ups. Overall Fantastic!
-
-
JonathanF.May 3, 2003Look, John H, Daniel C and Pizza the Hutt. Are you sure you're playing the same game as me? I can't even live with you giving it a 2, never mind Pepperoni man over here giving it a zero! It rules, no one can beat it for blasting, and probably one of the best games ever. Made up your mind yet, you three?
-
-
SomeoneElseMay 8, 2003Pizza the hut. Thers something wrong with u.
-
-
ByronM.May 9, 2003This game is everything i thought it would be,although the camera angles could be better,but nothing too serious,the graphics are flawless and lucas did it again. good job to everyone who worked on this project.
-
-
PizzatheHutJan 5, 2003This game would get a negative zero if i was allowed to... bad graphics, horrible control, glitches galore... lucas should get a lightsaber up his ass for being a greedy man. starwars movies also now suck big time and definitely aint looking forward to episode 3....
-
-
DanielC.Apr 12, 2003This game is horrible if you want a good action game play devil may cry it is way better than this piece of crap.
-
-
JohnD.Apr 15, 2003This game rules all. Best game ever for PS2. Blows away any game you can think of.
-
-
NigelG.Mar 14, 2003The game rules! the jetpack helps a lot!!!!
-
-
k/cfettMar 21, 2003WOW!!!!!!!!!! UP yours Game Informer.
-
-
Oct 13, 2014A fun shooting game, this is the game of my childhood, however there are quite clearly the dumbest of flaws present in this game.
The fighting mechanics are decent, and the graphics are decent for the time it was made back in 2002, but sloppy AI and the unfinished final chapter took a steaming dump on this almost masterpiece.
6/10 - Ben Hazelden -
Jan 24, 2016This game literally makes you become Jango Fett. The levels are also insanely hard, and a lightning fast trigger finger is required, prepare to die ALOT. But that is how it should be, because being Jango Fett isnt a walk in the park. Probably my favorite third person shooter, the controls and weapons provide you with everything you need to take down thousands of enemies.
-
Dec 5, 2016
-
Apr 4, 20178.1 - Can be very frustrating and cheap at times, but overall a fun and well-detailed action/adventure game. Physics and shooting are well done and very fast-paced, and environments are varied.
-
Jul 8, 2023If you like hunting bounty then look no further than bounty hunter. Unless you want a good video game.
The idea of playing as boba fett in the star wars underworld on paper sounds like one of the best ideas of all time. Unfortunately a boring story, linear progression and stifled gameplay make this a slog rather than a joy to finish. -
Jul 31, 2021
Awards & Rankings
|
37
|
#37 Most Discussed PS2 Game of 2002
|
|
7
|
#7 Most Shared PS2 Game of 2002
|
-
Could have been great, but relies too heavily on the "Jango Fett is cool" idea, and doesn't have the depth of gameplay needed to hold most people's interest.
-
Despite all the things Jango can do, control is streamlined and intuitive... A rock-solid action title that should keep Fett fans very happy.
-
Game InformerWith an archaic graphics engine, dreadfully awful camera tracking, extensive load times, and some of the most atrocious mission challenges known to man, it becomes quite clear where this game went wrong. [Jan 2003, p.89]