Tom Clancy's The Division 2

 PC
User Score
4.6

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 1687 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 661 out of 1687
  2. Mixed: 175 out of 1687
  3. Negative: 851 out of 1687

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Deadmeatsea
    Mar 16, 2019
    9
    EDit - Crashing fixed via patch. Now back to being great.

    Was good until crashes every 5 minutes on 15 March. Great gameplay, but crashing after every 5 minutes isn't cool.
  2. biggalingo224
    Mar 15, 2019
    0
    This game treats you like a child.
    When you begin the first mission of the game, you will notice that you have around 500 rounds for your AR. Why? because like a parent putting too much padding on their child going to the park, the game is putting in measures to ensure that the player is able to finish the mission. All of the good cover is on the side you approach from, and none of the    This game treats you like a child.
    When you begin the first mission of the game, you will notice that you have around 500 rounds for your AR. Why? because like a parent putting too much padding on their child going to the park, the game is putting in measures to ensure that the player is able to finish the mission. All of the good cover is on the side you approach from, and none of the enemies will attempt a flank. By holding your hand this much, the game ceases to have any difficulty, so it is inflated with fake difficulty, such as bullet sponge enemies, who in the second mission, will take 4-5 headshots to kill.
    The game also handles all of the movement in combat for you, making it essentially one step above an on-rails shooter. When in combat, to move to the next point of cover, all you have to do is look at it, and hold space. This is a cover based shooter. In a good cover based shooter, your placement matters; you need to have the angle advantage on your enemies, so getting to a good position is what you want to do. Getting their in other games requires thought, and can be tricky. In this game you hold space. By taking the cover mechanics out, and replacing it with, Hold Space mechanics, then they have taken "Cover based" out of the name, making it just a shooter. A shooter where the shooting itself is boring. When one of the games core mechanics is being taken care of by holding space, and one is just shoot the guy till he die, then what is left? A husk. The game feels lifeless, and I cannot see any love that has been put into the game. I pity any Dev who calls this game their magnum opus.

    Also the UI is really ugly    … Expand
  3. nermack
    Mar 15, 2019
    0
    One of the worst games ever release. And i liked the first one.
    First of all all the bugs from division 1 are back. 2. It's unstable on pc. Most people crash every 5 to 10 minutes in a group. 3. It's balanced for 4 people only you can not solo. But if you group you crash. Do yourself a favor skip this thing.
  4. MusclePig
    Mar 18, 2019
    9
    There is a whiff of SWJ bulls*it with all the strong female leaders and audio clips with "male toxicity" and so forth. Story is really bad and cringy.
    They didn't reinvent the wheel. This is The Division 2.0.
    Gameplay is solid, though. It's a good loot shooter.
    And it uses all my 16 CPU cores! That must be a first!
  5. dryerlaw
    Jun 3, 2019
    10
    Very satisfying gunplay & immersive world. But stutters so badly even in high-end computer.
  6. Bitek
    Mar 8, 2020
    6
    it is mindless loot shooter with tons of stuff to do. The city of Washington is vast and looking gorgeous. It is jaw dropping how detailed the city is. The combat is tight and really fun. I like this game. I do not follow the story much. I just keep doing assignments and keep shooting everything that walks and does not look friendly. it is fun to answer the call and help other players init is mindless loot shooter with tons of stuff to do. The city of Washington is vast and looking gorgeous. It is jaw dropping how detailed the city is. The combat is tight and really fun. I like this game. I do not follow the story much. I just keep doing assignments and keep shooting everything that walks and does not look friendly. it is fun to answer the call and help other players in need BUT the game feels repetitive quickly. There is not much variety of enemies.It just gets boring. i am baffled why Ubisoft would spend so much time on creating gorgeous environment but did not invest in creating more types of enemies to make the game more engaging.… Expand
  7. Shekky
    Apr 4, 2019
    7
    I was not a fan of the first one at all I found the first game quite boring. So it was quite refreshing to play The Division 2 and the game hooked me in. Dark Zones are quite disappointing with being limited to 12 people so if your in a squad of 4 your potentially up against 2 other squads. Progression felt a little too fast with me getting to 450 gear score quite easily. Progression needsI was not a fan of the first one at all I found the first game quite boring. So it was quite refreshing to play The Division 2 and the game hooked me in. Dark Zones are quite disappointing with being limited to 12 people so if your in a squad of 4 your potentially up against 2 other squads. Progression felt a little too fast with me getting to 450 gear score quite easily. Progression needs to be fleshed out a little more with a more grindy end game progression you would feel more accomplished when you actually made it to World Tier 4. I'm quite eager to find out what the other specializations will be and what the raids will be like. Should give this game the content it really needs at this point. World Tier 5 will be out April 5 and so this game will get some much need content update.

    +Story and Progression
    +Missions are Challenging with Harder Missions on the way
    -Dark Zones are boring needs larger populations instead of 12 people max
    -Current content is getting repetitive (Patch is April 5 and DLC Coming this Summer)

    in conclusion this game is very much like a Diablo styled Third Person Shooter. With future content and if devs decide to come out with an expansion to this game I will definately play this for years. mJust keep the content coming.    … Expand
  8. pino44io
    Nov 27, 2021
    10
    A total masterpiece. Attention to details is incredible! Shooting and the atmosphere are the best part for me.
  9. Gezzer
    Mar 30, 2019
    7
    As someone that's played over 700 hours (according to steam) I had a love hate relationship with the first one.

    Leveling was great experience but only so-so for a solo player sometimes. RNG was a **** and meta's were the norm. There was pretty much only one best in class weapon, and most end game gear sets were nothing to write home about. NPCs were bullet sponges most of the time and    As someone that's played over 700 hours (according to steam) I had a love hate relationship with the first one.

    Leveling was great experience but only so-so for a solo player sometimes. RNG was a **** and meta's were the norm. There was pretty much only one best in class weapon, and most end game gear sets were nothing to write home about. NPCs were bullet sponges most of the time and would use horde tactics to overwhelm players.
    And the bugs? Well those were the stuff of legends and exploits. Lastly and my biggest complaint the NPC spawning system was really punishing, especially at end game if you played solo. Well they did try to address much of the problems in the first game some still persist even today.

    The second game is a vast improvement on the first in many ways. I've been able to solo up to level 20 so far without any problems. NPCs are less bullet spongy and tactics over just bouncing around has become a viable game mechanic. Bad RNG well still a problem seems better. But the crafting and modding system so far seems whittled down to a point where we really don't need it TBH. The missions are reasonably different, but not as varied as the first IMHO. The environment seems both more and less alive. There are no random people just walking around and everyone is in a militia type group. Also the litter is a bit overdone IMHO.
    The developers have added a few new interesting gameplay elements and have brought over many that they introduced later in the first game. Lastly the bugs. It's pretty much the same story there. Way too many have slipped through Q&A. Even game breaking bugs that just shouldn't be in the game still. There are a couple of "projects" I can't complete due to the bugs. Like I said game stopping. I would of scored it a point or two higher based on the gameplay, my enjoyment, and all the improvements over the first one. But with the amount of bugs there are I just can't in all good conscious.

    But overall the game is a worthy successor to the first and if you liked it I'm fairly confident you'll like the second too. Just don't expect a perfect game. It has just as many warts as the first one did at launch. Let's hope this time the developers fix most of the problems before everyone deserts the game like they did the first one.    … Expand
  10. Udaff
    May 6, 2019
    10
    Good game, good continuation of the first part. The game is addictive.
    Хорошая игра, хорошее продолжение первой части. Игра затягивает.
  11. Hack
    Apr 4, 2019
    8
    It feels like an upgrade over the first game in every way, just not massively so, a little better everywhere does add up though.

    I'd say The Division 2 is currently the best loot shooter on the market, they do a lot better than the competition. Overall the gunplay is solid, AI is improved and actually quite smart now, enemies are less spongy than the first game, loot is abundant and    It feels like an upgrade over the first game in every way, just not massively so, a little better everywhere does add up though.

    I'd say The Division 2 is currently the best loot shooter on the market, they do a lot better than the competition. Overall the gunplay is solid, AI is improved and actually quite smart now, enemies are less spongy than the first game, loot is abundant and varied, performance is solid, visuals are great, the world is incredibly detailed and well made and it's just a very well made game in general. My only complaint would be the choice to make your character mute, I hate this so much, watching myself nod along without ever saying a word makes me less interested in the story.    … Expand
  12. Emphatic
    Apr 30, 2019
    9
    Improves on the first vastly, all the negative reviews are people that just don't understand what a looter shooter is meant to be, this is not a story driven RPG, if you came here for that you were looking in the wrong place, if you wanna shoot thing have lots of loot drop with random chance for god rolls and keep killing more things for more loot to kill things better a la Diablo 2 styleImproves on the first vastly, all the negative reviews are people that just don't understand what a looter shooter is meant to be, this is not a story driven RPG, if you came here for that you were looking in the wrong place, if you wanna shoot thing have lots of loot drop with random chance for god rolls and keep killing more things for more loot to kill things better a la Diablo 2 style then this is your game, that being said the story wasn't bad at all, it won't win any awards, its no Skyrim or anything but it served its purpose to get you to engame and keep it interesting doing so.… Expand
  13. SuperMax156
    Apr 7, 2019
    9
    If you like these kind of looter shooters then this is a great game. If you did not really like the first one then this one is not really substantially different, more of a tweaking. Personally I have
    really enjoyed this so far with some really great and tense battles.
  14. benhez
    Jul 24, 2019
    10
    They did it, a wealth on insane content and hundred of hours of stuff, they finally nailed a shoot mmo rpg, and its amazing.

    Took the first game an ran with it worlds apart from the disappointment of the first game.

    Graphics are some of the best ive seen currently.
    Content is amazing loads of guns and customization
  15. Lazyyawn
    May 15, 2020
    0
    Disgusting trash company publishing a DLC as an actual sequel, dont buy this scam
  16. Mitya64
    Feb 13, 2020
    8
    В первую часть я немного поиграл, но эта мне зашла. По времени прохождения у меня заняло 30ч. Но это к тому что я не проходил доп задания и исследования. Контента по сравнению с первой частью многа. В большинстве своем эта часть допиленная версия первой части. Появились гаджеты по типу щитов, турелей и дронов. Есть прокачка специализации: пулеметчик, огнеметчик и подрывник. У каждойВ первую часть я немного поиграл, но эта мне зашла. По времени прохождения у меня заняло 30ч. Но это к тому что я не проходил доп задания и исследования. Контента по сравнению с первой частью многа. В большинстве своем эта часть допиленная версия первой части. Появились гаджеты по типу щитов, турелей и дронов. Есть прокачка специализации: пулеметчик, огнеметчик и подрывник. У каждой специализации свой тип оружия. На карте помимо основных операций и дополнительных есть контрольные точки, это как аванпосты в far cry. После первого этапа он постоянно будет захвачен, поэтому если вам делать нечего можете заниматься отбиванием их. Есть секретные назначения, тоже как операции, только они обновляются после суток. Также появились мероприятия рандомные, то конвой с грузом, то радиопередача и т.д. Есть также укрепления, типа большие аванпосты. Не знаю как вам, но мне не понравилось то что с уровнем оружие и снаряга не меняется, то есть есть рпк на 15 уровне, она может появится и на 500 уровне. Сюжетка я так особо не слушал, но понял что есть война фракций, президент предатель наемники и ренегаты. Музыка прикольная кста. Но если вам надоело заниматься фигней, можно идти в пвп где вас будут задры нагибать, а можно в рейды, но они ОЧЕНЬ сложные. Вашингтон кста очень хорошо проработан, есть много интересных мест: пентагон, капитолий. По поводу того что в соло трудно, отчасти. Я почти всю игру в соло прошел, кроме укреплений, но с друзьями конечно интересней. В целом могу посоветовать вам эту игру, я ее кста за 300 р в эпик гей сторе купил.… Expand
  17. canis_anubis
    May 10, 2019
    9
    Please ignore the haters, this is as good as it gets for a persistent, online looter-shooter. There's a good chunk of content, it's fun, there's a long progression climb, and they're adding new content steadily. You can easily get 100+ hours of content out of this game for your $60.00 investment, and you'll get more if you pay for the annual pass.

    Sure, there's the odd bug, and some of    Please ignore the haters, this is as good as it gets for a persistent, online looter-shooter. There's a good chunk of content, it's fun, there's a long progression climb, and they're adding new content steadily. You can easily get 100+ hours of content out of this game for your $60.00 investment, and you'll get more if you pay for the annual pass.

    Sure, there's the odd bug, and some of the enemy spawns can be a bit implausible, but overall, the game is fun, engaging, and reasonably challenging.    … Expand
  18. nofakereviews
    Apr 16, 2021
    10
    Without any doubt the best loot shooter currently out there: We hav gone from Normal difficulty to Heroic/Legendary, and are now, after nearly 500 hours of play time, still playing this. Game is incredibly well balanced / fine tuned, Legendary difficulty is just that: It feels great, when you manage to finish the mission against all odds (The first time we tried Legendary, we were likeWithout any doubt the best loot shooter currently out there: We hav gone from Normal difficulty to Heroic/Legendary, and are now, after nearly 500 hours of play time, still playing this. Game is incredibly well balanced / fine tuned, Legendary difficulty is just that: It feels great, when you manage to finish the mission against all odds (The first time we tried Legendary, we were like "Are they f***** nuts - how are you supposed to do this ???").

    Much improved over Division 1, do not believe people who tell you otherwise: My wife played through DV1 before joining us in DV2, and I helped her a few times, so I could experience first hand, how much DV2 improves basic game mechanics over DV1. It also does not have the ridiculous "another new weapon tier" mechanic - you can improve the weapons you have forever, once you reach max level.

    Highly recommended :-)    … Expand
  19. LoletinAlexis
    Jun 5, 2019
    8
    The Division 2 is the big surprise of the year. An excellent shooter-looter.

    A story made to continue the plot and little else. At some point it may seem interesting, but it's just about to fill. Of course, it is well done, although the missions could be more varied.
  20. ak8268
    Mar 19, 2019
    9
    I normally do not play games like looter shooters because of the grind fest that it becomes. But this game offers A LOT of content, challenging levels, and fair loot drops. This game is just amazing when playing with a group of friends. Playing alone is difficult so I recommend finding a few friends. Teamwork goes a long way! The only issues I have with the game is the average storyI normally do not play games like looter shooters because of the grind fest that it becomes. But this game offers A LOT of content, challenging levels, and fair loot drops. This game is just amazing when playing with a group of friends. Playing alone is difficult so I recommend finding a few friends. Teamwork goes a long way! The only issues I have with the game is the average story telling and quality of life bugs.… Expand
  21. VeryGoodUserNam
    Apr 4, 2019
    8
    The division 2 is a sequel done right. It's fixed alot of the missed potential in the first game. As a division 1 player it's just so refreshing with a new location and fixes to the glaring issues that the first game had, like the TTK for example. Although Manhattan maybe was more cool in a sense i just feel that the new summer setting and change of location and factions makes the gameThe division 2 is a sequel done right. It's fixed alot of the missed potential in the first game. As a division 1 player it's just so refreshing with a new location and fixes to the glaring issues that the first game had, like the TTK for example. Although Manhattan maybe was more cool in a sense i just feel that the new summer setting and change of location and factions makes the game worth to play, even if you played the prequel.

    Loot is everywhere and you feel rewarded by every mission. Alot of time is just spent by changing different loadouts and equipment due to the high amounts of loot, which is good.

    The AI can be a bit weird sometimes but they try to flank you and most of the time it works really well.

    The endgame has really been revamped and looked up upon. Once you hit lvl 30 and begin the endgame alot of the game opens up and you progress through World Tiers by doing strongholds.

    The game isn't perfect though, it has its flaws. The PVP for me is just a mess right now especially in the occupied dark zones where the stats are basically the same as in PVE which means that all the damage that you do in PVE you do in the DZ. This enables people to make insane builds and just shred everybody in seconds. If you liked the darkzone experience i would highly recommend you to not enter the occupied darkzones and instead go and play in the normal darkzones due to the the normalisation in stats.

    The story was bland and boring. The characters were forgettable due to the lack of personality. Missions were pretty repetitive, but the locations made it interesting. In conclusion the campaign just felt very lackluster and boring all the way through the only thing that made it a little bit interesting was the change in enviroments between missions.    … Expand
  22. mr-NachoMen
    Jun 28, 2019
    6
    Despite of being a visually good looking and detailed game, it suffers from an uninteresting story and narrative and a poor mission design in which every single mission you come across have the same structure and objective in other word is a 100% repetitive game and after leveling up your character for a few moments the game gets boring and there's no reason to play it again or even keepDespite of being a visually good looking and detailed game, it suffers from an uninteresting story and narrative and a poor mission design in which every single mission you come across have the same structure and objective in other word is a 100% repetitive game and after leveling up your character for a few moments the game gets boring and there's no reason to play it again or even keep playing it.… Expand
  23. deltameta
    Apr 25, 2019
    10
    Отличное продолжение, новые механики замечательно вписываются в геймплей.
  24. Sherlock1989
    Apr 6, 2019
    10
    Отличное продолжение серии. Сделали реиграбельность на высшем уровне, то что и требовалось от разработчиков после первой части, в остальном игра и так была хороша, возможно только сюжетно просела, но и не сюжетом должна быть сильна данная игра. Я очень доволен и уже провел в игре более 100 часов.Отличное продолжение серии. Сделали реиграбельность на высшем уровне, то что и требовалось от разработчиков после первой части, в остальном игра и так была хороша, возможно только сюжетно просела, но и не сюжетом должна быть сильна данная игра. Я очень доволен и уже провел в игре более 100 часов.
  25. Xemnuz
    Jun 22, 2021
    6
    Critics gives it 8s and users giving it 0s, it defeats the whole point of metacritic, this is obviously not a perfect game and it's obviously very far from a bad game, so let's stay objective guys...
    Very impressed by the first Division, one of the smoothest coded games I've played, at least it ran so well on my PC. Beautiful textures, sounds, lighting, the whole atmosphere is great, a    Critics gives it 8s and users giving it 0s, it defeats the whole point of metacritic, this is obviously not a perfect game and it's obviously very far from a bad game, so let's stay objective guys...
    Very impressed by the first Division, one of the smoothest coded games I've played, at least it ran so well on my PC. Beautiful textures, sounds, lighting, the whole atmosphere is great, a bit repetetive but cool missions as well, I think I gave it 8/10. This however is much of the same but it feels just a tad bit worse in every aspect. That the first characters you meet in a city turned upside down are 8 out of 10 women, which is very unlikely and they are extremely uninteresting, bland in looks and voiceacting. The missions feels a bit more repetetive but it could be because I didnt finish the game too long ago the first time. Graphics are still beautiful and the combat works, though the map is really ugly and unorganized. I felt that the first game had more character and atmosphere and I feel that a 6/10 is the right rating and I hope that a 3rd one is in the making.    … Expand
  26. philzlz
    May 5, 2019
    8
    A looter shooter that entertained me for around twenty hours. The story unfortunately doesnt cut it but design of some main missions is phenomenal with fun areas to fight in. While i think that the snowed in New York from the first game was nicer to look at this one improves in a lot of areas, especially content wise from day one.

    Weapons feel unique and sound design is excellent but i    A looter shooter that entertained me for around twenty hours. The story unfortunately doesnt cut it but design of some main missions is phenomenal with fun areas to fight in. While i think that the snowed in New York from the first game was nicer to look at this one improves in a lot of areas, especially content wise from day one.

    Weapons feel unique and sound design is excellent but i couldnt push myself to play more after finishing the main story.    … Expand
  27. VG_Alex
    Mar 28, 2019
    8
    Perfectly restore Washington, a reasonable data system,About the new features was great but not enough,gun shooting is feeling much better and slippery AI makes the game more interested.

    8.1 Good
  28. Butane9000
    Mar 31, 2020
    7
    If you played the Division 1 then to say this game is an sequel basically tells you all you need to know. Honestly if you like looter shooters then you'll generally like this game. I picked it up when Ubisoft decided to have the Ultimate edition on sale for $12. That was a heck of a deal and worth every cent as far as value. While I ultimately don't greatly enjoy the combat for a long termIf you played the Division 1 then to say this game is an sequel basically tells you all you need to know. Honestly if you like looter shooters then you'll generally like this game. I picked it up when Ubisoft decided to have the Ultimate edition on sale for $12. That was a heck of a deal and worth every cent as far as value. While I ultimately don't greatly enjoy the combat for a long term game to play it was alright to romp around D.C. That being said let's get to the meat of the issue:

    The god awful plot, characters, and setting. The Division 1 setup a failed city and an attempt by the government to restore order to a city ruined by a pandemic. In this setting the Divisions attempts to clear out the gangs and restore New York City makes sense from a plot perspective as there's every incentive for the U.S. Government to reclaim the city. However the Division 2 is very different in that the pandemic has spread across the world and decimated the human population.

    This is the first failure of the Division 2. The plot has you a random Division agent head to D.C. to attempt to restore the government. The ultimate problem with this plot ties directly into the games setting. The pandemic decimates the human population, at that level of death there's really no more communal identity. Most survivors will have branched off to create their own communities that will be resistant to any "outsiders" due to necessity.

    This would've made a great plot point. Assuming the government still existed and wanted to "restore" the United States it'd have to do so using the standard methods available to government. These are by force, coercion, or subsidization. Since the government has nothing to subsidize with (currency is pointless in such a scenario) it would have to result to coercion or force. Which inevitably make it look like a bad guy.

    Honestly the bland, unimaginative characters don't help this game much either. I stopped playing weeks ago and I can't remember a single characters name. That tells you how poorly written these characters are.

    Finally the problems with the setting. One of the big points to the game is helping the scattered communities with supplies. But here's the problem with such a plot. With the exception of perishable goods, the world would be a land of plenty. Especially in the United States, you could go to any empty house or store and have clothes and electronic goods for days. The game also ignores one major factor every apocalyptic game forgets which is Bicycles. Sure, maybe there's not gas but that doesn't mean you can't pedal to your destination.

    Finally, the game misses the most engaging plot/setting element such a game should be using to it's maximum potential. The loss of our life of luxury. After helping one community you start hearing a page over the intercom system talking about "vegetarian" options being added back to the menu. Food would be the most precious resource next to clean drinkable water and the life of luxury we've live would quickly fall apart as people would either starve or have to give up their vegetarian lifestyles to survive. Yet the developers seem to prioritize identity politics and fantasy rather then engaging critics on our modern lifestyle.

    At the end of the day the Division 2 is a decent game but it's plot and poorly handled post game leaves it as a short term fling compared to it's competition (Destiny, Diablo etc.)    … Expand
  29. Gaghammer
    Mar 19, 2019
    9
    So. I'm 13 h into the game. Its repetitive, as it should be. It's that kind of a game. Its so far one of the best releases I've seen in quite some time. Movement got some flaws but its almost near perfect. The world feels engaging. I actually find myself running around the city exploring without checking the map, finding new stuff/events/missions to sink some time into. I cant wait to seeSo. I'm 13 h into the game. Its repetitive, as it should be. It's that kind of a game. Its so far one of the best releases I've seen in quite some time. Movement got some flaws but its almost near perfect. The world feels engaging. I actually find myself running around the city exploring without checking the map, finding new stuff/events/missions to sink some time into. I cant wait to see what endgame is like. This will be a game that i'll spend late nights playing through. Good work!… Expand
  30. Lykoi
    Mar 27, 2019
    7
    Ярких плюсов у игры два:
    1) Графика вызывает настоящее наслаждение. Это одна из тех игр, от которых моя папка со скриншотами разрывается от разного вида красот. Освещение, текстуры, геометрия объектов, погодные эффекты - все это просачивается отличным звуковым сопровождением практически во всех аспектах.
    2) Стрелять приятно, даже очень. Оружие можно подобрать и настроить так, как тебе    Ярких плюсов у игры два:
    1) Графика вызывает настоящее наслаждение. Это одна из тех игр, от которых моя папка со скриншотами разрывается от разного вида красот. Освещение, текстуры, геометрия объектов, погодные эффекты - все это просачивается отличным звуковым сопровождением практически во всех аспектах.

    2) Стрелять приятно, даже очень. Оружие можно подобрать и настроить так, как тебе нравится - и это отдельное удовольствие. Высокая отдача, но больший урон? А может нужна хорошая точность? Или положиться на удачу и вкачать шансы крита и скорострельность? Решать всегда вам - вариаций плейстайлов масса (а еще прикольно палить по окружающим объектам)
    -------
    Теперь о нейтральных моментах:
    1) Враги. Они - неоднозначные, что впрочем может сильно меняться в зависимости играете ли вы соло (как люблю я) или в пати. За 40 часов игры вам постепенно будут подкидывать вариации четырех видов врагов - психи с дубинками, обычные солдаты, инженеры с разными роботами/турелями и танки в тяжелой броне. В целом ростер врагов и вариации их экипировки в своих различных комбинациях держат все время прохождения неплохо, но в конце осознаешь, что разнообразие не то, чтобы очень впечатляет. ИИ неплохо работает с поиском путей, действует в команде. Фрустрирует появление врагов в спине и слишком долгое ожидание, пока голова вылезет из-за укрытия. На то, чтобы переключиться на гранату и кинуть ее к противнику тоже требуется много времени, поэтому чаще ты просто ждешь, пока болванчик высунется.
    2) Техническая составляющая - проблемы возникают только в кооперативе и я не могу сказать наверняка - дело в игре или в моем слабом ПК. В соло игре у меня были мелкие ошибки и никаких критичных, вроде отсутствия интерфейса, неподгружаемой стрельбы, зависания на загрузке. Оптимизация неплоха, но требуется приличный процессор.
    3) Не очень много заданий - все миссии строятся так: несколько секций где надо пострелять в мобов, последняя самая сложная с каким-то особым противником (это может быть любой вид противника, только более жирный и например со станящими патронами). Другое дело - каждая локация внутри помещений уникальна и сделана вручную, это тоже требует усилий. Поэтому оставлю в неоднозначном данную претензию.
    _____
    Теперь о том, что мне не понравилось:
    1) Сюжет. А где он?
    2) Все что связано с PVP в игре The Division 2 вроде бы сделано неплохо - режим 5 на 5 на продуманных картах, Темная зона со своим веселым рандомом. Но меня почему-то не затягивает.

    По итогу я ставлю игре очень хорошую оценку, т.к. Ubisoft действительно старается сделать увлекательную онлайн игру со своими фишками, но забывает про сюжет и совсем не цепляет PVP. Я продолжу следить за проектом, но только в рамках новых PVE активностей.    … Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

26
#26 Best PC Game of 2019
9
#9 Most Discussed PC Game of 2019
23
#23 Most Shared PC Game of 2019

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
84

Generally favorable reviews - based on 34 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 32 out of 34
  2. Mixed: 2 out of 34
  3. Negative: 0 out of 34
  1. Game World Navigator Magazine
    May 15, 2019
    85
    Perfect reward system, very tactile gunplay and great visuals make Division 2 the best loot shooter on the market, and one of the best co-op games in the recent years. [Issue#237, p.36]
  2. VGC
    May 2, 2019
    60
    For all the deafening noise and fury of its street battles and set-pieces, The Division 2 is, at heart, a game of co-operative tidying up with incrementally better guns.
    Read full review
  3. MGG
    Apr 27, 2019
    85
    With the experience accumulated on The Division 1, Massive manages with TD2 to excite our curiosity. Stronger, more generous, better built, the title succeeds where other games as service before it has struggled to. Thanks to its end-game, which renew the experience by adding content and skillfully recycles the existing one, but also thanks to this map of Washington, absolutely fantastic, which allows more than ever to immerse yourself in the universe of the agents of the Division.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »