Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Wildlands

 PC
User Score
6.7

Mixed or average reviews- based on 772 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 407 out of 772
  2. Mixed: 185 out of 772
  3. Negative: 180 out of 772
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. DreamCore
    Mar 19, 2017
    6
    To review this game I have to compare it to other open world games.

    To start off, this game is EXTREMELY repetitive. Compare this game to Horizon Zero Dawn for example. It has a good story, cut-scenes, the world is smaller but more dense. There are only 5 Cauldrons, 6 Bandit Camps, limitied number of side quests etc. meaning the different mechanics isn't being milked/overused like they    To review this game I have to compare it to other open world games.

    To start off, this game is EXTREMELY repetitive. Compare this game to Horizon Zero Dawn for example. It has a good story, cut-scenes, the world is smaller but more dense. There are only 5 Cauldrons, 6 Bandit Camps, limitied number of side quests etc. meaning the different mechanics isn't being milked/overused like they are in all Ubisoft games.

    Wildlands has essentially no story worth speaking of other than the backstory of all the cartel members. All quests, no matter the goal (destroy something, interrogate someone, defend a place, gather intel), simply consists of infiltrating a base either by stealth or frontal assault. No matter the quest, this is all you do. The weapon chests, intel locations, side activites litter the entire map so after doing 20 of each you're so fed up with it that you'd rather kill yourself than doing it again.

    In the end it boils down to how well the developers manages to hide the repetitiveness of the game. And Ubisoft does a very poor job with this, just like they do with all their open world games. They simply lack a soul. In GTA 5 the missions are so well designed (riding a motorbike on top of a train, climbing the ouside of a scyscraper, doing bank heists, driving a submarine etc) that it doesn't feel repetitive. Compared to Horizon, GTA 5 and Witcher 3 for example, this game feels extremely bland, repetitive and soulless.    … Expand
  2. eyeluvop
    Mar 15, 2017
    6
    A very mediocre, run of the mill open world game that fails to do anything right.
    From horrible driving, to a forgettable story and incredibly bad voice acting/dialogue. Gunplay, stealth, everything is just bad. Customization is alright, but it has barely any purpose.
    And baby makes three.
  3. 0235
    Mar 14, 2017
    7
    I am only about 20 hours in, and the majority of those 20 hours have been spent playing single player, withthe Ai buddies helping out, though i did play a brief bit of 2 player co-op,
    I brought the game myself, but at a hugely discounted price due to pre-order bonus and Uplay club points, and I also got access to the Beta for free.
    The size of the map, the diversity of the locations,    I am only about 20 hours in, and the majority of those 20 hours have been spent playing single player, withthe Ai buddies helping out, though i did play a brief bit of 2 player co-op,
    I brought the game myself, but at a hugely discounted price due to pre-order bonus and Uplay club points, and I also got access to the Beta for free.

    The size of the map, the diversity of the locations, the wealth of customisation and the beauty of the scenerey are staggering. its a 10/10 on the ubisoft scale for a ubisoft open world game, ticking every box, even the little "fake life" that goes on with kids kicking balls around a dusty town.

    But like most Ubisoft games this is a facade, you spend any time looking, its easy to see through. you start shooting in a crowded civillian area, the civillians arae just as likely to duck down in the middle of a road, or run straight into your gunfire. and between settlements there is very little beyond lush jungles, perfect for walking on foot.

    Talking about the large map, in other Ubisoft games, placing a map pointer at the far end of the map will give you a 5KM waypoint, it will be enjoyable to get there, in Wilalnds, placing even a close by mission marker may beat least 3KM, and you regularly feel you want to rush there by a car or helicopter, the game does little to encourage you to drive slow and take in the beautiful scenerey.

    As for gameplay, its solid. there are some criticisms on bullet drop, but mostly if you shoot someone, they go down.

    AI is a hot topic. i have sometiems had it where AI have been laser accurate in knowing my position, but in my recent multiplayer session we were attacking an enemy base, we got spotted and they sent a patrol out. we fled to the nearby hills and watched from drones as they got out of cars, patrolled the area, gave up, got back into their cars and drove away. now this wasnt perfect, it took a few minuts for the AI to figure out where the road was, and some Ai even took random civillian vehicles.

    the story is, limited at best. you spend so much time not focusing onthe story, but there are some things to read between the lines. i have seen many reviews saying its just some "hoorah" shooter where you can solve all problems by shooting enough people, and while the gamplay my make you believe that, listening to kingslayer files and idle AI chatter will make you realise that the story does go a bit deeper, but similar to many games, this is just giving story from found tapes and doccuments NOT showing you the story.

    In short, this game is mercenaries 3 with elss boom, a boring just cause, a fun (but limited ARMA 3) and i have even seen people compare it to MGSV without the rich story and heritage.

    the world is big, beautiful and bold, with clearly defined gameplay which will allow you to stray from it in co-op, but dont expect the game to get on well with you if you try to break the games rules. thoroughly enjoying it, and 100% happy i purchased it    … Expand
  4. diegocg
    Aug 14, 2018
    4
    After 80 hours of gameplay... (I have the Uplay version)

    Could be good if the constantly bugs (the reason for the rating) are not so annoying... it is one of the most bugged game I ever played. And the new DLC (Year 2) came with many new bugs. Really, only buy with a good discount. Some pros: Graphs are beautiful, with varied landscapes. Really big open world. Coop is very nice.    After 80 hours of gameplay... (I have the Uplay version)

    Could be good if the constantly bugs (the reason for the rating) are not so annoying... it is one of the most bugged game I ever played. And the new DLC (Year 2) came with many new bugs.
    Really, only buy with a good discount.

    Some pros:
    Graphs are beautiful, with varied landscapes.
    Really big open world.
    Coop is very nice.
    Sniper shooting is cool.
    Nice weapons.
    Good voice acting
    The drone is cool.
    Sync shoot.

    Bad:
    IA of the enemies sometimes are extreme dumb (they can crash their cars and kill their friends and you are blamed for this if you are in the area)
    Enemies sometimes spawn from nothing, near to you.
    Unidad can be annoying, appearing in the middle of a mission (occur too much)
    Missions are repetitive after some time.
    The missions appear to be "side quests" only.

    Some (few) of the bugs:
    The sniper weapon constantly loses their supressor and you need to go to the menu to equip then (in some weapons, it is impossible to equip after you lost it).
    In coop, players can see things different from the other (for example, one player see a running helicopter, other no).
    Sometimes the game closes.
    In the 2 last updates (Uplay version) I had to reinstall the entire game, because the update failed after the download (17GB + 14GB).
    In coop, one play accomplished the mission and the other not, even doing the mission together.    … Expand
  5. clansfear
    May 10, 2019
    9
    I like to describe this game in terms of a fusion between The Division and GTA: Online. Gunplay in this one is amazing, I can't really think of any other game in which I would enjoy shooting as much. Missions are somewhat repeatable, but as environment and stealth are two crucial factors on the highest difficulty level (which I do recommend a lot), they vary a lot in that regard. Add someI like to describe this game in terms of a fusion between The Division and GTA: Online. Gunplay in this one is amazing, I can't really think of any other game in which I would enjoy shooting as much. Missions are somewhat repeatable, but as environment and stealth are two crucial factors on the highest difficulty level (which I do recommend a lot), they vary a lot in that regard. Add some coop interactions with a group of friends (I only played on coop), and you have a solid experience for many, many hours to come.… Expand
  6. Derrik4999
    Mar 24, 2017
    0
    This is basicly the divison but it's a reskin with **** AI partners that are nonexsistent to anyone else beside of you,i actually had the feeling that your "partners" were just an illusion as they were WAY to OP killing/shooting people but way to **** retarded to follow you properly without running into 50 enemies
  7. MrHello
    Mar 30, 2017
    7
    If only UBISOFT would have decided to give us :
    - Better driving experience
    - Better voice acting

    That game would actually be a success !
    Why Ubisoft ? Why ?
  8. Robinjhoe
    Mar 13, 2017
    7
    Pros:
    + Pretty and huge World to play in
    + Very detailed weapon customization + A godd amount of skills Cons: - Ubisoft - Stealth is possible but not rewarding. It feels forced on higher difficulties - Companions are useless - enemy AI not the brightest - Some immersion errors (for me) Dont get me wrong the game is pretty fun. But I would remmonend to play it with friends. It    Pros:
    + Pretty and huge World to play in
    + Very detailed weapon customization
    + A godd amount of skills

    Cons:
    - Ubisoft
    - Stealth is possible but not rewarding. It feels forced on higher difficulties
    - Companions are useless
    - enemy AI not the brightest
    - Some immersion errors (for me)

    Dont get me wrong the game is pretty fun. But I would remmonend to play it with friends. It is an Ubisoft game so some bugs and awful servers are preprogrammed. Stealth is only optional, not too hard but gives no reward other than you wont die in seconds. or you call a mortar strike, rush in and shoots everyone with your lmg. Also the enemies can handle 4 to 5 shots wearing nothing besides pants, while yourself are getting killed by 6 bullets wearing bulletproof clothes.

    As I said. Its Ubisoft. Dont expect to much, but maybe you will be surprised.    … Expand
  9. Captain_Chaos
    Apr 17, 2017
    4
    I can't say much for or against Wildlands. It's another generic military cover shooter with shiny graphics and boring characters. It has some nice customization of your appearance and weapons, and in particular a lot of gun camos. I hear a lot about performance problems, though I haven't encountered such, it DID crash on exit, for what thats worth. I also hear alot about ♥♥♥♥♥♥ drivingI can't say much for or against Wildlands. It's another generic military cover shooter with shiny graphics and boring characters. It has some nice customization of your appearance and weapons, and in particular a lot of gun camos. I hear a lot about performance problems, though I haven't encountered such, it DID crash on exit, for what thats worth. I also hear alot about ♥♥♥♥♥♥ driving controls and I will say the ground vehicles were a bit squirrley, and It seemed like I couldn't fly a helicopter up and forward at the same time- but at least they don't want to fall out of the sky like Battlefield choppers. The spy drone mechanic was nice, but im wondering why the "sync shot" ability only works on one guy. You have a team of up to three AI guys backing you up, can't they shoot three enemies? There might be a way of doing this though, I didn't read up on the upgrade trees.

    It seems like the kind of game you could have left as a 6-10 hour pipe shooter without adding the illusion of additional game time via a freeroam mode. Based on what I've seen so far, it's at least passably playable, but I've played many other games that do what it does better. It's at least co-op focused, which already puts it a step above Rainbow Six: Siege.    … Expand
  10. ASTAR77
    Mar 15, 2017
    9
    the only flaws of this game are technical issues and details that can be fixed with a patch (which i hope ubisoft releases soon).
    aside from it its an awesome experience, huge and varied maps and an endless possibilities of approaching every mission, the story as cartoonish as it seems reflects a reality in latin america (i am mexican and its like watching the news channel). great for coop!
  11. DJE
    Mar 25, 2017
    6
    Woeful shooting mechanics, horrible and immature dialogue and bland gameplay. The only positive I can say is the impressive sandbox that capture the Bolivian vistas. Why couldn't it be Rainbow 6 Siege mechanics in an open world like this?
  12. ZeroAffex
    May 19, 2017
    10
    This game while far from being a military simulator like that of Arma 3, is still a lot of fun to play and is up there with my favorite releases for 2017. This is the first Ubisoft game I've ever purchased and was sure I had made a mistake doing so after (buyers regret). However, I was incredibly surprised and have come to greatly enjoy this game. I haven't played this in co-op, whichThis game while far from being a military simulator like that of Arma 3, is still a lot of fun to play and is up there with my favorite releases for 2017. This is the first Ubisoft game I've ever purchased and was sure I had made a mistake doing so after (buyers regret). However, I was incredibly surprised and have come to greatly enjoy this game. I haven't played this in co-op, which seems to be the positive of this game from some, yet I am having a lot of fun in solo. Once I beat the game solo I will start rocking co-op with my buddies, but wanted to air it out that its not a "must" to enjoy WildLands, which was the impression I had going in. The story is lackluster and can easily be ignored. The graphics are a solid 8.5/10 and PC optimization is a 9/10 having surprisingly stable fps and no stuttering even during autosaves. (I own a 1080 FTW 2, Intel 6-6000K, 32gb Ram, ect). I'd also like to note I have yet to encounter any bugs so far (60 hours). The civilian AI is programmed poorly, at times being annoying, where as the cartel AI is well done, which is good since theyre the ones you that shoot at you haha. There are lots of options for customizing your game experience from difficulty modes, hud options and the like to tailor to your liking. The game itself is huge and offers many tactical options to employ at your own discretion for quest you take. There are lots of weapons to obtain, side quest to complex and in-game lore to find. Last GTA game I played was GTA 4 and will say the vehicles for WildLands remind me of a GTA game, very arcadey, simple controls and just awful physics. If your buying this game expecting a military sim or any sort of realistic gameplay, you'll be disappointed. If your going into it like I did, expecting a casual, open world, military themed shooter, you'll be blown away and have lots of fun. Overall this game is an easy 9/10 for me.… Expand
  13. elcap0
    May 8, 2019
    3
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I stopped playing to write this. I made this account to write this. The game is nothing like past ghost recon games, it is not fun, it is the standard Ubisoft open world fare that seems to come out with the irritating regularity of a period.

    the game is annoyingly inaccurate, and I am not talking "my M4A1 is a 5MOA gun in the game when the platform is traditionally 1MOA." My AI controlled squadmate CONSISTENTLY fres his sniper rifle full auto when in a vehicle. Enemies can fire perfectly accurate streams of death using machine pistols at 50+ yards, and villagers seem to ignore the special ops troops shouting in English while killing gun wielding maniacs.

    I stopped playing when the following exchange happened between my character and a squadmate.

    "Ok I found the location for a cocaine factory, it is in an abandoned meat processing plant"

    "Alright boss let's go bust some heads"

    "We can't, the door to the building is protected by a passcode, which is in the computer of one of their lieutenants"

    freaking what??? the crack special military team made up of the best of the best soldiers is stopped by a freaking code lock??

    I was out at that point, my immersion was gone. The old Ghost team would have blown up the factory, killed everyone, and been back stateside before anyone missed them.

    Ranting aside I do have one final question. Why open world? This game could have been a level based Third person shooter and nothing of narrative value would have been lost.

    In the end the game is bland, boring, and can be replaced by it's previous counterparts.

    if you like tactical combat go play MGS5. if you like sniping gameplay, go play Sniper Elite. if you have a hankering for third person shooters, Spec Ops: The Line has not gone anywhere.

    in short: Bland Boring and Dull, I got it on sale for $14 and I think I paid too much for it    … Expand
  14. FlippinSnip3r
    Jun 2, 2020
    8
    is the game fun? yes, does it have issues? yes, am i fine with those issues? yes,
  15. DwaneDibbley
    Mar 11, 2017
    4
    This is not Ghost Recon, its FarCry 6.
    If u like Ghost Recon, this game is terrible 3/10.
    If u like FarCry, its solid 7/10.
    ..........................
  16. SpideyWebs
    Mar 12, 2017
    6
    I found the game to be more frustrating than fun and more monotonous than interesting. It was just a generic open world game with The Legend of Zelda slapped on the cover. Not much in this felt like a LoZ game and in my opinion that was a negative not a positive. Definitely the worst Zelda game I have ever played.
  17. Pussnus
    Mar 8, 2017
    0
    Bad... cant believe people actually tought a buggy, glitchy, badly optimized and all around a bad beta would come out as a good game. Its one of the worst games of the year, so dissapointing.
  18. brod40
    Mar 11, 2017
    3
    This game is emblematic of Ubisoft's main problem: quantity over quality. There are bells and whistles and you can paint your gun and there map is covered in icon vomit, all of which distracts from the fact that the game is just no fun to actually play.

    The game is huge, the world is detailed and varied, and screwing around with friends is pretty fun. The problem is that the    This game is emblematic of Ubisoft's main problem: quantity over quality. There are bells and whistles and you can paint your gun and there map is covered in icon vomit, all of which distracts from the fact that the game is just no fun to actually play.

    The game is huge, the world is detailed and varied, and screwing around with friends is pretty fun. The problem is that the minute-to-minute gameplay is horrifically unsatisfying. If we're going to make a game whose main draws are exploration, stealth, and shooting, wouldn't you try to make those elements fun? If you answered yes, you'll never work at Ubisoft.

    Gunplay is barely serviceable. Aiming feels sluggish and the audio lacks weight and punch. My biggest gripe is that Wildlands has latched onto one of the most baffling trends in modern shooter design, something I like to call the "Nerf" effect. Rather than firing supersonic metal projectiles like guns in the real world, guns in Wildlands shoot slow moving, glowing nerf darts. Ostensibly this aesthetic is supposed to look like tracer fire, but it completely undermines the gritty, realistic feel the game is going for. When using assault weapons and sidearms at close range, the effect isn't too bad, but it completely ruins the immersion and fun of sniping. I LOVE the inclusion of bullet drop, but it's taken to risible extremes in this game. It feels less like shooting highpowered rifles and more like lobbing novelty mini footballs.

    I won't spend too much time on the vehicles, except to say they're horrible. Cars and track are decent, but the control scheme for the helicopter is - without hyperbole - one of the worst things I've ever experienced in a game.

    The story is blah - the big bad is pretty cool but the plot + dialogue are generic tough-guy inanity.

    This, look so many of other of Ubi's recent games, feels like a piece of software created by a focus group rather than a team of passionate gamers and developers. It's big and shiny and as boring as the day is long.    … Expand
  19. SirMeno
    Mar 7, 2017
    10
    Баллистика, большой красивый открытый мир, возможность играть с друзьями. Фан.
    Без альтернатив считаю что это лучший кооп на текущее время.
  20. n1kolay
    Mar 8, 2017
    0
    нет сюжета, 40 фпс на 1070, тонна багов и СРЕДНИЙ БАЛЛ от критиков - 8/10. Вы там нормальные вообще?
  21. norris_
    Mar 9, 2017
    6
    YAOWG (Yet Another Open World Game). No redeeming qualities. Very meh. See cons on other reviews. Just to fill the 150 character minimum I'll list some keywords: empty, repetitive, lousy controls, bad gun play, map icon bloat, pointless travelling, outdated.
  22. Cotroneo
    Mar 8, 2017
    8
    All the negative reviews are by people too dumb to update their drivers.

    If you look at the game as kind of a more 'realistic', multiplayer 'Just Cause', that focuses more on weapons and taking you time to do things, you'll have super fun. However, I do think that this game would get pretty mundane pretty fast if you weren't goofing off with a few friends while playing it. -2    All the negative reviews are by people too dumb to update their drivers.

    If you look at the game as kind of a more 'realistic', multiplayer 'Just Cause', that focuses more on weapons and taking you time to do things, you'll have super fun.

    However, I do think that this game would get pretty mundane pretty fast if you weren't goofing off with a few friends while playing it.

    -2 score for having helicopters with guns, but having helicopters with no ability to strafe (turning is all roll).    … Expand
  23. ajje
    Aug 26, 2017
    7
    Essence of the game: Kill all drug cartel fiefs (everyone cartel related really).

    The game overall plays out like this: 1. Enter a region. 2. Receive a radio communication from the task giver, where she tells you about the fief in the region, that she has no idea where that person is. However she knows about a couple of points of interests (typically 4-5) which are then marked in gold    Essence of the game: Kill all drug cartel fiefs (everyone cartel related really).

    The game overall plays out like this:
    1. Enter a region.
    2. Receive a radio communication from the task giver, where she tells you about the fief in the region, that she has no idea where that person is. However she knows about a couple of points of interests (typically 4-5) which are then marked in gold on the map.
    3. You travel to each POI and as you reach each of them, they transform into another POI on the map, some distance away.
    4. You travel to that new POI location.
    5. Once you've visited all of POIs in the region, a final POI is marked on the map.
    6. You travel to the final POI and is tasked with killing or kidnapping a person.
    7. You again travel a fair distance to some specific safehouse where you drop the kidnapped person off, and the story progresses a bit. You are told about the impact of the loss of this fief to the cartel organisation.
    8. Repeat 26 times from step 1.

    This game is long. The main reason for that is cheap padding.
    1. A constant back and forth travelling (backtracking) where travelling between a single POI to another may take 3-4 minutes by helicopter or many times that with a land vehicle.
    2. In between each step above, you will face an infinite number of enemies, that respawn "as soon as you turn your back on them". Or more accuratly, as soon as you've moved a short distance away.
    3. In order to not be annihilated you need to upgrade your skill tree and that is accomplished by... you guessed it, boring fetch quests, travelling to yet other POIs on the map, where you have to kill hordes of respawning enemies.
    4. You can't just acquire new and improved weapons and addons for your weapons stash from killed enemies, no you need to travel far and wide to hundreds of additional POIs, where the same "Crate" will exist with a trophy in it.
    5. Each item you seek is typically placed as far away from you as possible, while still fitting in the overall story segment. For example, it's almost certain that if there's a village with an item in it, then the item will be located in the highest building, at the top floor, as far away from the stairs as possible. It seems UBI used an algorithm for travelling salesman problem where they inverted the heuristic to produce the location with the furthest travelling distance from any other point on the map.

    Liked:
    Even though the game has all the problems mentioned in the separate review, the cheap tricks to pad its length, and the constant repetition, I still found it a blast to play, in small chunks.

    * Performance, it ran beautifully at 60 FPS on my Intel Core i7 4770, with a Geforce GTX 1080 and 32 GB RAM at 1920x1200 resolution. No crashes.
    * Voices. Acting was rather good I found and added quite a bit to the immersion. Your team mates respond to surroundings. In the beginning I was impressed by the variety of comments by the AI mates, but found they ran out of ambient dialogue after about 10% into the game. A potential for improvement in UBIs future titles, but as a proof of concept, I think it turned out rather well and applaud the devs for the idea.
    * Graphics. The scenery is absolutely stunning. From snow covered mountains to dense jungles. Nothing beats flying a helicopter over cities, canyons, bridges, the jungle and the alps. It's something very relaxing about it. The character models also looked great. Attention to detail was overall very high imo.
    * Gunplay. Bullets have trajectories! Head shots are fatal! Unarmored enemies are not bullet sponges! Weapon handling feels a bit on the realistic side when compared to other titles, with weapon weight and stats playing into how the weapons behave. Overall I found gun fights highly enjoyable, which really is a saving grace as you wade through the hordes of zomb... I mean cartel and unidad soldiers.
    * Rebel assistance. This is a new thing I believe in UBI titles. Along with your skill tree, there is a separate branch which allows various forms of assistance from bolivian rebels. The types include sending grunts to help you in gun fights (can make a HUGE difference, especially for timed challenges), calling in mortar strikes (Awesome, especially for taking out pesky drone jammers), helping with recon etc. I found the former two great, while the rest I never saw a use for.
    * Your AI mates aren't completely useless! They're definitely not Rainbow six good, but they're much better than in your average FPS title.
    * The story was OK. It definitely wasn't CDPR good, but much better than other UBI titles. It also served a purpose, giving you enough of a justification for exploring areas. Judging this aspect entirely within the UBI bubble, I'd give it above average, akin to AC 1-3 where the story still had some value.

    To be continued ...
    [ Due to 5000 chars max, I'll try posting my cons in a separate review. ]    … Expand
  24. Chaython
    Apr 3, 2018
    0
    The year is 2018 Ubisoft has moved into games as a service.
    Always online laggy garbage. Microtransactions; 2 season passes... Bland open world. Terrible driving mechanics. Overall buggy and disappointing experience. Terrible ai; terrible stealth. The worst Ghost Recon game that dares to call it's self Ghost Recon.
  25. BattlePhenom
    Feb 26, 2019
    10
    This game is seriously underrated. It's filled with plenty of content, multiplayer, challenges, and customization to last for hours. It's not perfect, but if Ubisoft continue to improve upon this design in the next iteration of Ghost Recon, it has the potential to be a GOTY contender.
  26. Mad-Marty
    May 5, 2019
    5
    Complete the first region and you've seen it all.

    After being introduced with the first story mission thats it, no whatsoever story drives the game further, except ... go out there and kill endless leaders to unlock the big boss.
  27. spyvspyaeon
    Feb 27, 2019
    10
    This is a tripleA game and worth any penny spent on it. The map is vast and it's incredible the number of missions u can do, loads and loads of fun things to explore. While I had concerns with this game (if it would run in my PC) actually runs pretty well and with no complaint about it.

    What the game lacks is a bit more of updates, except that for all good hours I've spent 10/10. Tom    This is a tripleA game and worth any penny spent on it. The map is vast and it's incredible the number of missions u can do, loads and loads of fun things to explore. While I had concerns with this game (if it would run in my PC) actually runs pretty well and with no complaint about it.

    What the game lacks is a bit more of updates, except that for all good hours I've spent 10/10. Tom clancy already my fav, Rainbow six also a top Title!!!! pretty good!!!    … Expand
  28. 10538
    Sep 24, 2017
    0
    I have played almost all of the Tom Clancy Ghost Recon games and I have to say this one is just bad. Missions change regularly as you're trying to complete them. Related missions just seem random. Altogether, poorly conceived and executed.
  29. N0AH
    Mar 11, 2018
    10
    This game is like Skyrim, you do the missions, then you get bored and explore the whole map and do some random **** I have explored %57 of the map with my spare time. The most fun thing to do in this game is skydiving. It's so fun, you should try it out.
  30. itifonhom
    Mar 10, 2017
    0
    Want a good shooter to play with your buddy in coop? Well, then look somewhere else cause this "game" is just crap software! This thing isn't able even to launch, that's right, haven't being able yet to play it, although I bought it on launch day! And I'm not the only one, just check their Forums. Ubisoft does nothing to solve this, so, just go and spend your money somewhere else!
Page:

Awards & Rankings

18
#18 Most Discussed PC Game of 2017
82
#82 Most Shared PC Game of 2017

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
69

Mixed or average reviews - based on 31 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 15 out of 31
  2. Mixed: 14 out of 31
  3. Negative: 2 out of 31
  1. PC PowerPlay
    May 11, 2017
    60
    Utilises the amazing PC technology of today to be, eh, okay. [Issue#261, p.68]
    Read full review
  2. CD-Action
    Apr 26, 2017
    75
    Great visuals and a huge map are perfect foundations for a good open world game, but Wildlands falls short of expectations (because of unpleasant driving and flight models among other things) and it’s up to Ubisoft to remedy that. [05/2017, p.46]
  3. PLAY! Zine
    Apr 26, 2017
    65
    Fun shooting and open world are great, but there aren’t many Ghost Recon elements and game simply feels dull at times.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »