- Publisher: Electronic Arts
- Release Date: Jan 13, 2009
- Also On: PlayStation 3, Xbox 360
User Score
Mixed or average reviews- based on 75 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 30 out of 75
-
Mixed: 35 out of 75
-
Negative: 10 out of 75
Buy Now
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
Dec 1, 2011For a major Lord of the Rings fan it was quite a let down. Game play was repetitive and clunky. However playing as your favourite races makes up for it (i mean arrowing a pig like orc is boss. Could be better but it fills a nice hole
-
Apr 25, 2013I'm not gonna lie this game is a total Battlefront 2 re-skin, but it has a truly enjoyable LotR twist to it and the melee was surprisingly good! I like LotR, that may have altered my opinion)
-
Dec 1, 2015
-
Feb 21, 2017
-
Nov 18, 2019Game has some value but only for Multiplayer.
Let's say is and average one - forgettable after few hours.
-
Unless you fall in love with the deathmatch modes, the main draw here is the two campaigns - and most gamers will be able to cut their way through both in under five hours. Even if you're a massive fan of the series, we'd advise you to approach this game with caution.
-
The basic idea behind Conquest is cool: play the largest battles from Lord of the Rings from the perspective of a soldier. The out-of-date graphics, bad class balance and stubborn controls would be no problem if this was a mod for Battlefront or Battlefield, but this is a full price game. The only thing worthy of the big license is the soundtrack and that's available for less.
-
Very much throwaway gaming, Conquest is wholly lacklustre, devoid of any real purpose, and is a real low point for Pandemic, which after Mercenaries 2 is really saying something. 'Must do better' is a gross understatement.