Starfield

 PC
User Score
5.6

Mixed or average reviews- based on 5711 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2,635 out of 5711
  2. Mixed: 612 out of 5711
  3. Negative: 2,464 out of 5711
Buy Now
Buy on
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. guracco
    Sep 12, 2023
    1
    I'm a fan of TES 4, 5, and Fallout 3, 4, and this is the first time I got stuck in the middle of a main quest with the glitch and was completely unplayable.

    I cannot believe they are releasing the game like this. I want to write a lot of complaints about this, but I'm too sad right now, so I'll just leave this comment. I give up playing Starfield. bye Bethesda Softworks, from your    I'm a fan of TES 4, 5, and Fallout 3, 4, and this is the first time I got stuck in the middle of a main quest with the glitch and was completely unplayable.

    I cannot believe they are releasing the game like this.

    I want to write a lot of complaints about this, but I'm too sad right now, so I'll just leave this comment. I give up playing Starfield. bye Bethesda Softworks, from your former fan from jpn    … Expand
  2. psychobudgie
    Sep 12, 2023
    6
    Incredibly disappointing by Bethesda's standards. The space game where travelling in space is optional. You can quite literally fast travel between planets, and by planets I mean a small map that happens to be on a planet. This is not No Mans Sky so forget about exploration for anything other than mineral gathering. The missions are as generic as they come and after around 8 hours in it isIncredibly disappointing by Bethesda's standards. The space game where travelling in space is optional. You can quite literally fast travel between planets, and by planets I mean a small map that happens to be on a planet. This is not No Mans Sky so forget about exploration for anything other than mineral gathering. The missions are as generic as they come and after around 8 hours in it is incredibly boring. The combat is generic and underwhelming, graphically it's not exactly ground breaking but will batter your hardware like it is and it has its fair share of game breaking bugs and crashing to the desktop so you need to save often. I see many giving this 10/10 which is ridiculous given the issues it has. Amazed how Bethesda seems to get a pass for putting out poorly optimised, unfinished and bug ridden games when every other publisher, rightly, gets dragged over the coals for it. Simply not good enough considering the time it spent in development. It's an OK game but the negatives far outweigh any positives.… Expand
  3. alejandro24
    Sep 12, 2023
    10
    uno de los mejores juegos que ha sacado bethesda,está entre los mejores con la saga fallout
  4. TheDesigner4343
    Sep 12, 2023
    9
    10 hours in the game and so far I experienced only 1 bug, restarted the game and the bugs goes away. Only problem is there is no local map it is so hard to navigate through large cities especially New Atlantis.
  5. Mjh101
    Sep 12, 2023
    4
    I've tried everything to enjoy this game, based on lots of YouTube videos from content creators telling me, this game is great. It's not a great game and its not even a good game. Its average at best.
  6. SamAxe00
    Sep 12, 2023
    6
    Although fun, I expected more. Buggy & feels repetitive. The constant fast travel & load screens cause a loss of immersion and prevents the sense of exploration found in previous BGW titles. Lots to do but feels like it has limited depth to the open world exploration. Significant potential with mods, but it feels like Bethesda did the bare minimum and is planning on letting the moddingAlthough fun, I expected more. Buggy & feels repetitive. The constant fast travel & load screens cause a loss of immersion and prevents the sense of exploration found in previous BGW titles. Lots to do but feels like it has limited depth to the open world exploration. Significant potential with mods, but it feels like Bethesda did the bare minimum and is planning on letting the modding community finish it for them.… Expand
  7. Harpokhrat
    Sep 12, 2023
    3
    It is not 2011 anymore.
    The game mechanics, the AI, the story and everything in the game is outdated.
  8. Franklinpf
    Sep 12, 2023
    10
    Very good game . I'm playing it for many hrs from now and having a lot of fun
  9. Sylvest3r
    Sep 12, 2023
    0
    This has been disappointing. I knew i should have saved my spending on something else
  10. diocancaro
    Sep 12, 2023
    0
    it has some decent roleplaying systems like quests, crafting and ships but the way you use them in the main gameplay loop is sooo aszzzz i can't give this a 6 even. the writing is asszzz, the combat is assszzzzz oblivion clears this all day, even skyrim is better.
  11. shmitzles
    Sep 12, 2023
    6
    I've put 18 hours into Starfield and I think I've played enough to come to my conclusion. Sadly, for me Starfield is the worst Bethesda RPG I've played. The menu system and traveling really grinds my gears and the writing, face animation, and camera work really pull me out of the story. I constantly found my self zoning out and skipping dialogue.

    At times the game is gorgeous and at other    I've put 18 hours into Starfield and I think I've played enough to come to my conclusion. Sadly, for me Starfield is the worst Bethesda RPG I've played. The menu system and traveling really grinds my gears and the writing, face animation, and camera work really pull me out of the story. I constantly found my self zoning out and skipping dialogue.

    At times the game is gorgeous and at other times it looks very outdated. NPCs stare into your soul for no reason and over encumbrance is yet again and issue.

    I'm willing to give it a 6 because the gun play is okay and the ship building is kind of fun. Overall I was very excited to play Starfield but in the end I mostly felt disappointed and irritated by my 18 hour experience.    … Expand
  12. JudasJack
    Sep 12, 2023
    2
    Low tier effort from BSG. Replacing handcrafted world with procedurally generated generic zones. More of an empty theme park than a sand box. Combat consists of guns and a clone of the Shouts system vs guys with guns and the occasional big bug. Real spaceflight is non-existent, just loading screens, ship combat that is worse than arcade games from the 1990s. No exploration of any value inLow tier effort from BSG. Replacing handcrafted world with procedurally generated generic zones. More of an empty theme park than a sand box. Combat consists of guns and a clone of the Shouts system vs guys with guns and the occasional big bug. Real spaceflight is non-existent, just loading screens, ship combat that is worse than arcade games from the 1990s. No exploration of any value in either the generic city zones, or the "planets" which are just zones with mostly procedurally generated POIs separated by vast stretches of featureless rock. Weak overall entry for BSG.… Expand
  13. Kenarwars
    Sep 12, 2023
    0
    Positives: I can't find anything positive unfortunately
    Negatives: - poor performance on highend PC
    - Graphics are ancient, only a little bit improved - NPC are without depth, no emotions - Story is written like a child. e.g. You start as a miner and find an artifact and just get a spaceship from a stranger. - 1000 planets but 99% almost the same and pointless - Cities seem tiny,    Positives: I can't find anything positive unfortunately
    Negatives: - poor performance on highend PC
    - Graphics are ancient, only a little bit improved
    - NPC are without depth, no emotions
    - Story is written like a child. e.g. You start as a miner and find an artifact and just get a spaceship from a stranger.
    - 1000 planets but 99% almost the same and pointless
    - Cities seem tiny, it's 2023 there should be more than 10 houses per city.
    - Space in the game hardly exists, because you have to use only fast travel anyway. You can't even land yourself.
    - and so on

    For 20 years of development time of a company worth billions, which have as a goal to dominate the market, this is just an extremely bad joke. I can also in no way understand the 100 point ratings of some magazines. Since the game is already extremely bad. If Bethesda had rather put the money into the game than 90% into the PR, it could have been something.    … Expand
  14. gulgulglut
    Sep 12, 2023
    0
    It's similar to fallout 4 but with no open world. The worst Bethesda game I ever seen.
  15. Alinazari
    Sep 12, 2023
    10
    Awesome thanks to Microsoft and the Bethesda team for this great game. Thank you Phil Spencer and the Xbox team.
  16. Nottacritic
    Sep 12, 2023
    1
    I was so excited about this game. I have played a combined 1000 hours of Skyrim and Fallout 4. But wow. How does this game look older than Fallout 4? Why is the writing so painfully bad?

    It’s the biggest, opennest, emptiest game yet… from Bethesda, at least. For better ships and graphics, play No Man’s Sky. For better plot and setting, play Fallout 4. For creepy rubber faces with awful    I was so excited about this game. I have played a combined 1000 hours of Skyrim and Fallout 4. But wow. How does this game look older than Fallout 4? Why is the writing so painfully bad?

    It’s the biggest, opennest, emptiest game yet… from Bethesda, at least. For better ships and graphics, play No Man’s Sky. For better plot and setting, play Fallout 4. For creepy rubber faces with awful lighting, go ahead and play Starfield.

    The best part of this game is it launched on Game Pass where you can sign up, try Starfield, and still have time to get the full Game Pass refund.    … Expand
  17. kubus765
    Sep 12, 2023
    0
    I just made an account here to rate it 0/10... Why? Well first of all I don't like game developers that straight up LIE. Secondly, the game is boring af, which is actually the main technical problem beside others. By others I mean that the engine is VERY outdated and not optimized for PC. Consoles too actually. I am really disappointed in Bethesda. I liked their games. I don't think I'llI just made an account here to rate it 0/10... Why? Well first of all I don't like game developers that straight up LIE. Secondly, the game is boring af, which is actually the main technical problem beside others. By others I mean that the engine is VERY outdated and not optimized for PC. Consoles too actually. I am really disappointed in Bethesda. I liked their games. I don't think I'll buy another game from them. I will refund my 100$. If Bethesda keeps doing this then they will lose all respect very soon. People who rate so high must be out of their minds...… Expand
  18. EnerJay
    Sep 12, 2023
    10
    Epic, Bethesda game in space. More story driven than NMS, WIDER than BG3! Expansive open world to get lost in. The best RPG in space ever written so far
  19. Smithsmc
    Sep 12, 2023
    2
    Boring gameplay.
    Empty world.
    Bad AI, bad shooting, bad graphics, no optimization.

    Disaster and a joke.
  20. coltsr2
    Sep 12, 2023
    7
    Starfield has some great moments BUT... has some major and glaring issues that often spoil the game.. First off...How is this supposed to be a space based adventure with your own spaceship, when you cant even fly the spaceships properly? We are unable to fly on and off, or even over the surface of the planets? Hell even the far lower budget indie developers 'No mans Sky' at least lets youStarfield has some great moments BUT... has some major and glaring issues that often spoil the game.. First off...How is this supposed to be a space based adventure with your own spaceship, when you cant even fly the spaceships properly? We are unable to fly on and off, or even over the surface of the planets? Hell even the far lower budget indie developers 'No mans Sky' at least lets you land and take off from planets and fly around them! But Starfield's space exploration is a bit of a scam, a gimmick, a fake, a charade, a thin veneer, its pure snake oil sold to us by Todd Howard the snake oil salesman.
    Starfield has no real space exploration at all, just one base/mine/space station per planet, with fast travel cutscenes and loading scenes masquerading as space travel, the whole space exploration element is all a giant let-down!. instead we get the same irritating repetitive over and over cutscenes of the landings and take-offs..and that's it! Awful!
    Why even bother with the planets anyway if that's the best they could do with all the money they had and giant dev team? Its a joke, an insult to our intelligence and betrayal of what Todd Howard promised! They should of just kept it all on one planet, with different biomes and simply called it Planetfield! Whilst i enjoyed some of the planets in starfield, most are barren and continued nothing much to the game.

    And why so many Cutscenes? they are everywhere, Take off your ship = animated cutscene,...land your ship = animated cutscene, Fly to the nearest planet = animated cutscene, get out of your space ship chair = animated cutscene, get out of your spaceship = black screen cutscene, get back in your ship = black screen cutscene, get back into your chair = animated cutscene cutscene, Walk through a door black screen cutscene, Everything is cutscenes! I half expected a nice trip on the monorail/metro, looking out of the windows as I travelled between districts, but no...all i got was..you guessed it another fast travel black screen Cutscene! Compare that to the awesome real monorail in Star citizen!
    As for the planets, they may as well be non existent like ive said.., often just empty barren and nothing to do, with simplistic graphics, its a pointless waste of time even wanting to explore them!..there is nothing to explore! They are ultimately as fake as the games title. Fast travel to a planet you are presented with a few options, land on the designated area with the base, city, mine etc, or land on the planet somewhere miles away and be presented with zero options other than to mine pointless materials. So in effect each planet is just a staging post/backdrop for the missions. No exploration at all.
    Procedurally generated worlds can be boring and repetitive, even when done well. They need Procedurally generated bases, cities, missions etc. Now that would of been cool.
    No HDR options or even basic gamma or brightness options, so for me at least many of the interiors ended up looking very bright, foggy and often felt like I was in a smoke filled night club in most of the interior spaces! But thankfully the modding community was soon able to offer fixes for this on day one of official release! BUT Why should it be left up to the modders to sort these blaring issues out on day one of release?
    I've also added a custom ini to increase the field of view to 90, instead of the restrictive default of 70. As for the cities in the game, they are cartoon looking, low textured, like New Atlantis, which is a very basic, cartoon looking, small city with a scattering of useless NPC's walking or sitting around, and whats with the odd looking fake trees, and rubbish pools of fake looking water with cartoon water lily's in? As for all the cafe's, and shops, they are just empty facades with no real life in them.
    Missions are often ridiculous and boring.
    ive given it a 7..due to the effort put into some of the bases and ideas. It could of been a 10 if they kept to their promises. Its a real shame because you can see a lot of effort HAS gone into certain parts of the game.
    If Todd Howard was a used car salesman, he would walk you around an amazing Ferrari at his car showroom, waffle off all the great specs to get your interest level up, then quickly get you to sign the paper work for the expensive purchase, then when you are walked to the handover room, you would be given an old clapped out pickup truck with a Ferrari badge 'sticky taped' to the bonnet!    … Expand
  21. Franton
    Sep 12, 2023
    0
    porcodedioooooooooooioooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooiiiooooooi ohhh gg tt DD dgr DVR FF FF FF bonus bimbe x che ha di Gheddafi Red db ho ha devi
  22. Plywoodface
    Sep 12, 2023
    10
    This game is awesome!! Hours fly by in a instant so much to do and so many different missions, could play it over multiple times and have a different experience each time glad I bought a series s for this!
  23. Alfred_23
    Sep 12, 2023
    10
    Masive game, with so much to do on it, 100% recommended for everyone. It may start a little slow, but after a few hours its a non stop playing game.
  24. LOSGAFES
    Sep 12, 2023
    0
    Mucho hipe que a caído a plomo la sensación de explotación espacial es ninguna , nada de lo prometido
  25. Cognipop
    Sep 12, 2023
    3
    I fell for the marketing company and advertising spin dominating social media :(
  26. ZBeeB
    Sep 12, 2023
    10
    A great and beautiful game, whether the main or side missions are all wonderful
    The best game of the year so far
  27. trevor1981
    Sep 12, 2023
    0
    All those negative reviews come from the users upset this is an Xbox exclusive, so just ignore them.
    I personally bought Xbox SX for Starfield alone and am very-very happy I did.
    This the best game so far I've played this year and having said that I've barely even scratched the surface.
    It's about time though that Xbox makes an analogy for a platinum trophy like PlayStation has
  28. TeezyWeezy
    Sep 12, 2023
    5
    The game is ok but not really something you would expect in 2023 from one of the biggest game developers. It's a good game but sadly not really a big enough improvement for what was promised and kinda expected.
  29. limminator
    Sep 12, 2023
    10
    This game is epic! I haven't felt this way about a game since skyrim or zelda botw. I don't care what the naysayser say; it's really good. While I can understand some of the criticism (loading screens, long walks of empty/bland exploration), I think that mostly comes from playing the game differently than I do, or they're just mad their lowend PC lags or maybe they just have a playstationThis game is epic! I haven't felt this way about a game since skyrim or zelda botw. I don't care what the naysayser say; it's really good. While I can understand some of the criticism (loading screens, long walks of empty/bland exploration), I think that mostly comes from playing the game differently than I do, or they're just mad their lowend PC lags or maybe they just have a playstation - who knows. FPS is fine, but drops a bit in cities. Give it time. It gets better as you go, but you need to talk to a lot of people to get quests.… Expand
  30. garayba
    Sep 12, 2023
    6
    What a disappointment it's really just a 6/10 i'm not just angry . look when you first start it you will be amazed by the graphics and the mystery but after sometime you'll realize that this game is so boring , it's just running around , talking to npcs , shooting enemies , repeat . i'm serious that's it , that's the most "exiting" part other stuff is below boring. planets are boring ,What a disappointment it's really just a 6/10 i'm not just angry . look when you first start it you will be amazed by the graphics and the mystery but after sometime you'll realize that this game is so boring , it's just running around , talking to npcs , shooting enemies , repeat . i'm serious that's it , that's the most "exiting" part other stuff is below boring. planets are boring , main quest is boring , they didn't even create animations for most of the things it's just a text like "hey you took that and activated that and an explosing happened" lol but no animations happens no effect nothing it's an empty game , don't believe the hype anymore.… Expand
  31. Derwin666
    Sep 12, 2023
    1
    Far too many major performance issues on the pc. I have a problem with lag/stutter when un-scoping a weapon. It also lags /stutters when switching to the scanner. It didnt start till approx 20hrs of play.

    I wish i hadn't spent the money.
  32. ActuallyAnnnoye
    Sep 12, 2023
    5
    This is a spoiler-free review.

    The Motto For this game should be "Getting Moar for Less". When we usually hear the term "Getting Moar for Less", we usually imagine a product whose value outpaces its price. But when that product becomes a Bethesda game named Starfield, you can be guaranteed the consumer will be paying more and getting less compared to other AAA games of this genre.    This is a spoiler-free review.

    The Motto For this game should be "Getting Moar for Less".

    When we usually hear the term "Getting Moar for Less", we usually imagine a product whose value outpaces its price. But when that product becomes a Bethesda game named Starfield, you can be guaranteed the consumer will be paying more and getting less compared to other AAA games of this genre.

    Starfield is not a good game, not because it isn't an update or an improvement on Bethesda's production process. It would be a lie or a misrepresentation for me to say that Bethesda has not upgraded the visuals as well as the quality of the game. I haven't had any bugs, crashes, or anything to undermine Bethesda on the data integrity of Starfield. The visual aesthetics are sometimes breathtaking and sometimes sterile, but that is the stylization of the game not a shortcoming of the game's refinement.

    No, where Starfield completely falls off the rails, is when the game is running and you the player actually pay attention to the presentation formulated in front of you. Starfield is a 2005 game created with all the technology and graphical fidelity of a contemporary title. This wouldn't be a problem if Bethesda Softworks created timeless classics worth revisiting, but they don't. Bethesda's stories, how they are told, and what is depicted are all middling, milquetoast and tame.

    Let me give an example, let's judge how Bethesda goes about interaction between characters to progress the story and create immersion between player and their companions. Not to name names, but a better game company allows companions to banter between themselves allowing you; the voiceless protagonist to listen in on a conversation that defines key characteristics about your companions as well as keeps you immersed in your travels between objectives. Bethesda on the other hand has you pull anybody you want to know about aside and commence a flurry of inquiries you must choose from. Your responses feel less spontaneous or thought-provoking, and more robotic and interrogating. You are asking query after query as your companion cycles through each one like a bad chat GPT. If you don't interact with that companion you will never hear from them. This relationship is a one-way street, or more like a semantic cul de sac. You spit out a random question at any random time, it cycles around generic answers till you ask everything possible on the presented screen. Conversations with your crew are as organic as polyurethane.

    With interactions so robotic they could make the Terminator blush, you would think the combat in the game would be the saving grace for Bethesda's would be cosmic opus. Well don't hold your breath, the combat in Starfield is mindnumbling bland. It is so bland that it should count as a blemish against Bethesda because they refuse to put real time and effort into making it better. Weight, sound, impact, Bethesda was really focused on making a space sim because none of those things seem to have any value in Starfield's combat. The banal spongy lifeless AI, paired with your dull uninspired guns, that look interesting but handle like dead wood, beckon you to turn the game off and do anything else to feel life. The lifelessness of Starfield's combat must be an homage to the dark void that is space because no professional Video game company should be proud of this presentation.

    Last but certainly not least, we must talk about the scope of this world. This isn't a space game, this is a Bethesda game about Space. This game wasn't built around you exploring the unknown. This game wasn't about using the technology and advances of space-age mankind. This game is about taking the cues, beats, and gimmicks Bethesda has used before and recycling them again. Space is just a complex loading screen, your quest takes you to an assortment of vaults, and the cities are just populated settlements. Fallout 76 was their test realm, Starfield is the 1.0 release.

    Usually, creating a subpar product whether objective or subjective in critique was something we as a gaming community ignored. But Microsoft, Bethesda's parent company saw fit to raise the price of Starfield to 70 dollars. Starfield for 70 dollars is a travesty. The sad fact is I think MS knows that Starfield is a poor representation of a next-generation product, and I think cynically this mediocre offering was purposely presented to bolster the player base of the game pass. Either way, Starfield can't be suffered as an actual Space exploration game.

    In closing; Starfield is a claustrophobic, cramp, mundane experience, with feeble combat, wooden narrative, and anemic immersion. To play Starfield and to laud it with praise is to validate Bethesda for being a great game company because they say so, not because they earn it. If gamers start to put up with this quality of game design the floors the limit for the future.    … Expand
  33. thimolor
    Sep 12, 2023
    5
    Soulless piece of crap. There is nothing to care about Starfields "vast" world. Dialogue is silly and the NPC's interactions are laughable. Graphics are not so great and gameplay feels really old and all the menus are created by someone who does not care about usability. I just feel ripped off by Bethesda.
  34. Kotikoira
    Sep 12, 2023
    3
    This game is such a disappointment that I've registered to Metacritic to give it a 3. I managed to play up to 2 hours and it became unbearable. It's like playing a game that was developed 20 years ago, that old Freelancer game had almost better graphics if not x10 more fun to play even today.
  35. Andrudis
    Sep 12, 2023
    6
    It is not a bad game, and have some good ideas behind it, but outdated game engine, poor balance and very user-unfriendly UI ruin all immersion. Mods will be able to fix some of the issues, particularly with UI, but even mods will not be able to fix fundamental issue with outdated engine.
    Main problem of this game - it does not feel like a live open world, but instead feels like a set of    It is not a bad game, and have some good ideas behind it, but outdated game engine, poor balance and very user-unfriendly UI ruin all immersion. Mods will be able to fix some of the issues, particularly with UI, but even mods will not be able to fix fundamental issue with outdated engine.
    Main problem of this game - it does not feel like a live open world, but instead feels like a set of hundreds of very static small maps connected either by instant teleports or by vast emptiness.    … Expand
  36. cquint
    Sep 12, 2023
    5
    "I'm sorry, but this RPG isn't on the same level as other Bethesda games. It's only better than Fallout 76, which is a disaster in itself. It offers many hours of gameplay, but menu navigation disrupts immersion, there's an excess of endless dialogues, characters that seem like cartoons, and a lack of character customization options without Fallout's SPECIAL system. In the end, it's just"I'm sorry, but this RPG isn't on the same level as other Bethesda games. It's only better than Fallout 76, which is a disaster in itself. It offers many hours of gameplay, but menu navigation disrupts immersion, there's an excess of endless dialogues, characters that seem like cartoons, and a lack of character customization options without Fallout's SPECIAL system. In the end, it's just another game that revolves around managing the character's inventory, which can be a hassle. I'm playing it through a subscription, but I wouldn't really buy it for more than $10. We'll have to hope that modders can improve the game because if it depends on Bethesda, it's not going well. The visuals are dated, and the game feels sluggish and clunky."… Expand
  37. Bluemoonjeon
    Sep 12, 2023
    2
    Sloppy details, space games where you can't travel in space, and freedom that you don't have. You can see completely degraded producers from previous works such as Skyrim and Fallout 4.
  38. blizzardbox
    Sep 12, 2023
    3
    +nice retro futuristic sci fi setting
    +over all ncie graphics
    +gunplay

    -boring exploration
    -not open world
    -only fast travel through menus
    -combat way too easy, even on very hard + mods
    -cant even dive
    -horrible performance
    -horrible PC port
    -dum AI
    -tiny skilltree
    -half of the skilltree is +10% something
    --mainstreamfield
  39. corvusman
    Sep 12, 2023
    2
    Very disappointed with the game. Shallow, boring, uninspiring. Very lazy work from the company I used to respect a lot. Bethesda, you can't just slap a new wallpaper on Fallout 4 and claim you worked on that for 7 years.
  40. KaiserGust
    Sep 12, 2023
    9
    Ich hab mir keinen einzigen Trailer im Vorhinein angesehen , weder mich über dieses Spiel informiert.. es weckte nicht meine Interessen & ich sprang nicht den Hype auf. Nun habe ich 20H gespielt & ich finde es war dieses Jahr das beste Spiel das ich angespielt habe . Zu oft hatte ich alte Spiele das 100x angespielt, dieses bringt eine Frische Story & ist perfekt für Einzelspieler. MirIch hab mir keinen einzigen Trailer im Vorhinein angesehen , weder mich über dieses Spiel informiert.. es weckte nicht meine Interessen & ich sprang nicht den Hype auf. Nun habe ich 20H gespielt & ich finde es war dieses Jahr das beste Spiel das ich angespielt habe . Zu oft hatte ich alte Spiele das 100x angespielt, dieses bringt eine Frische Story & ist perfekt für Einzelspieler. Mir gefällt es sehr, nach Red dead Redemption 2 , das beste Singleplayer Spiel seit langem . Lg… Expand
  41. ilBaro
    Sep 12, 2023
    8
    A circa 45 ore di gioco posso dire che Starfield mi ha dato un feeling di immersione che mi mancava dai tempi di Skyrim. I dialoghi spesso sono deboli e gli NPC sono estremamente legnosi in puro stile Bethesda. Assurdo che nel 2023 debba aspettare 7 secondi che l'NPC si metta in tasca il taccuino/palmare prima di cominciare la conversazione o dover camminare per 3 minuti a velocità lumacaA circa 45 ore di gioco posso dire che Starfield mi ha dato un feeling di immersione che mi mancava dai tempi di Skyrim. I dialoghi spesso sono deboli e gli NPC sono estremamente legnosi in puro stile Bethesda. Assurdo che nel 2023 debba aspettare 7 secondi che l'NPC si metta in tasca il taccuino/palmare prima di cominciare la conversazione o dover camminare per 3 minuti a velocità lumaca seguendo il solito NPC troppo veloce per la mia camminata ma troppo lento per la mia corsa. Santo cielo.

    Tuttavia, queste non piccole problematiche sono state completamente spazzate via dall'immensità del titolo, la mole quasi asfissiante di quest che compaiono nel tuo menù e la libertà creativa che ti danno sia nella personalizzazione della navicella che nella creazione degli avamposti. Ogni volta che avvio Starfield al rientro da lavoro provo un senso di relax che difficilmente provo con altri titoli, è come essere due volte a casa.    … Expand
  42. Elvistete
    Sep 12, 2023
    0
    Como que um jogo que fica 10 anos em desenvolvimento sai todo cágado dessa forma
  43. zkomp
    Sep 12, 2023
    0
    Bethesda being Bethesda, making the most disappointing game of the year. Full of jank and chores, no soul and no depth. Better avoid this one (look into No mans Sky for space exploration done right, or Baldurs Gate for an RPG done right).
  44. AntonEgo69x
    Sep 12, 2023
    5
    “16 times the details” is repeating itself a decent game in a box of lies as always. The game itself isn’t that bad but the technical problems on pc are lame. It’s not the game they presented.
  45. Haryono
    Sep 12, 2023
    0
    Someone would kill me if I don't give bad review for this game. So, Starfield is terrible game.
  46. Redsjo
    Sep 12, 2023
    1
    I have to be honest here. I sailed the rough sea to play this game. I've played like 2 hours and all I had to do is fast travel to space then fast travel to a different system near an objective then fly to the space station to enter the space station. Everytime you see a loading screen. Whats even the point of going to space to immediately fast travel again we can all agree that's not goodI have to be honest here. I sailed the rough sea to play this game. I've played like 2 hours and all I had to do is fast travel to space then fast travel to a different system near an objective then fly to the space station to enter the space station. Everytime you see a loading screen. Whats even the point of going to space to immediately fast travel again we can all agree that's not good game design. Then the combat. Your companions are so dumb they are shooting the walls while shooting at the enemy. Then the graphics. The textures are good on characters imho but the lack of shading of shadows especially in the first planet it's just non existent it's really looking bad for a game that runs like a potato on an I7-13700k, Rtx3080, Ddr4 32gb 3200mhz. When you had your first meeting and go outside you see the grey concrete and the green vegentation it just looks like someone puked on the screen to be honest. The "ai" walking on the streets in the districts doesn't response on you shooting near them or aiming at them. It feels lifeless.… Expand
  47. Artslet
    Sep 12, 2023
    10
    I have not played but when haters give a game 1 or 0, to a game that is playable... Maybe you don't like the game but no game can be 0 or 1 from 10, unless it's really bugged and can't play it. My score is to compensate tha silly reviewers. Metacritic is getting bad because that silly haters
  48. BLGReviews
    Sep 12, 2023
    9
    Over 150 hours logged, here is what I have to say.

    Despite issues with optimization, a few nagging bugs and a having to navigate a rather underwhelming interface; Bethesda’s personality is on full display in yet another massive installment for one of the industry’s most decorated studios. Unconventional to the likes of previous titles like Skyrim and Fallout 3, there isn’t a famous    Over 150 hours logged, here is what I have to say.

    Despite issues with optimization, a few nagging bugs and a having to navigate a rather underwhelming interface; Bethesda’s personality is on full display in yet another massive installment for one of the industry’s most decorated studios.

    Unconventional to the likes of previous titles like Skyrim and Fallout 3, there isn’t a famous “step out moment” but rather a slow crescendo into what ends up being one of the deepest narrative driven experiences I’ve had in years. There are so many moments that have you feeling like you are playing four or five games in one.

    Starfield is an epic adventure that is worth savoring and is best described as a slow cooked meal- it is the slow cooked meals that are most satisfying.

    - Black Legacy Games    … Expand
  49. dASHKO
    Sep 12, 2023
    8
    Amazing game, if not for terrible optimization...
    This game has everything to keep you entertained for hours. Here you can spend hours building your ship, hours crafting and arranging furniture in your home, hours mining resources and exploring planets, trading, transporting contraband, fighting on ships, stealing things, hiring companions, improving guns and spacesuits, cooking, helping    Amazing game, if not for terrible optimization...
    This game has everything to keep you entertained for hours. Here you can spend hours building your ship, hours crafting and arranging furniture in your home, hours mining resources and exploring planets, trading, transporting contraband, fighting on ships, stealing things, hiring companions, improving guns and spacesuits, cooking, helping random passersby, play your role and receive dissatisfaction or approval from others, complete quests in different ways. You can do literally anything!
    I started the game late in the evening and it didn’t let me go until the morning, you really feel the atmosphere of space here, and the side quests are like small stories inside this world. After the first story quest, I came across some completely random additional quest and this line of quests told me the whole story of the conspiracy and took me 6-8 hours to complete it, and then it became more and more interesting to play. It was really fun, I don't understand why some people think the game is boring. It's definitely not a game for everyone, but it's a good, worthwhile game in the classic Bethesda style.
    The game had every chance to become a hit and personally my favorite for many years, if not for one thing, the optimization here is truly terrible. The picture is nice and beautiful, but I would like to have 1080p 60 fps on my RTX 4060, and not ~30-45 :D I could only start playing comfortably at 60-80 frames with a DLSS mod. It’s very sad that the optimization was taken care of by enthusiasts and not by Bethesda.    … Expand
  50. MementoMor7
    Sep 12, 2023
    10
    The most important thing is to start - this is a great game, one of a kind. I've seen a lot of hate towards this game with complaints like "flying in this game is not like in space simulators", "In this game you can't manually land like in "No man's sky", "In this game shooting is not like in doom" etc. that is, claims that in a huge RPG game its individual elements are not at the sameThe most important thing is to start - this is a great game, one of a kind. I've seen a lot of hate towards this game with complaints like "flying in this game is not like in space simulators", "In this game you can't manually land like in "No man's sky", "In this game shooting is not like in doom" etc. that is, claims that in a huge RPG game its individual elements are not at the same level as in the best highly specialized games, where in fact there is practically nothing else besides these mechanics.
    Another common complaint I heard was "The game world is empty procedurally generated garbage". Seriously? Does this really need to be explained? For 5-6 years, any development team can physically work out a map (so that it is filled with interesting activities per square meter) approximately the size of Skyrim or Fallout 4 - this is 9-15 square kilometers, since people's time and forces are not unlimited. In Starfield, we don’t have a single map like in Skyrim or F4, but there are planets, it turns out that a conditional map of 15 square kilometers is divided into zones, these zones are separate well-designed planets, it’s easy to count them in the game, it won’t be so a lot of.
    Everything else (1000 planets) is just an entourage with procedural generation and the illusion of an infinite space, so that there is no dissonance like in the same Mass Effects, where there were conditional 4-5 planets (just the same ordinary limited locations) and that's it, nowhere else even theoretically you can't fly.
    So did anyone seriously expect the game will have 1,000 hand-crafted planets?
    Do I need to say that all these claims look absolutely stupid and childish? People came up with a dream game that no one promised them - A huge RPG with 1000 hand-crafted planets, Star Citizen, No Man's Sky and DOOM in one bottle, and when they didn't get it, they accused the developers of lying and labeled the game as a failure ... probably forgetting that only Star Citizen (in which, by the way, there is practically nothing else besides good space flights and resource collection) has been developed for 13 years and has not yet been released ... That's the essence of the absurdity - people demanded that Bethesda make a dream game in 6 years, which actually takes 5000 years to develop...
    Returning to the game itself, I can safely say that this is the most ambitious and incredible project from Bethesda, in which almost all aspects and mechanics have been improved compared to their previous games, which in turn were masterpieces and improved radically - graphics, lighting, animations, physics and facial animations - all of this has been taken to a whole new level. The style of the game, all those dashboards, computers, buttons and switches, is pure ecstasy for fans of science fiction. And this is only talking about the visual part, and in addition to this, you will also find a huge RPG game with exciting quests and many additional mechanics, such as building your own ships and outposts. This game is very meditative, unhurried, in which a huge emphasis is placed on immersion and getting aesthetic pleasure from the very stay in this world, and if you like games like RDR 2 or Death Stranding, you will definitely like Starfield, although they are different in genre games, but in spirit they are very close.
    Starfield is an amazing game, the best Bethesda game so far and yes it's not perfect, but show me the perfect game without flaws, the answer is simple, games like this just don't exist in our world.    … Expand
  51. w4r10ck1604
    Sep 12, 2023
    5
    There is so much that is so dissapointing in the Fast-Travel-Simulator ´23

    - the Inventory management is horrible - the facial animations are pretty ugly - the german snych is not lipsynch - the walking speed on pc, makes me mad. you can run, you can walk, you can sprint! but you don´t match the speed of the other npc´s - the loading screens.... - the whole fast travel system    There is so much that is so dissapointing in the Fast-Travel-Simulator ´23

    - the Inventory management is horrible
    - the facial animations are pretty ugly
    - the german snych is not lipsynch
    - the walking speed on pc, makes me mad. you can run, you can walk, you can sprint! but you don´t
    match the speed of the other npc´s

    - the loading screens....
    - the whole fast travel system makes me furious. the game is wasting my time.
    open the map, select the destination "loading screen", open the map again, select the landing point
    "loading screen" exit the ship "loading screen", enter a building "loading screen" do the quest. fast
    travel back to your ship. and restart the loading screen simulation!

    - the world is empty.... in a universe with over 1000 Planets.... there are only 4 cities...

    - the npc´s in the cities are dumb like bread!

    - it´s so performance hungry and idk why?

    - dungeons and outposts repeat

    overall i am glad this game is on gamepass... i would get mad if i spent 70 Bucks for this thing!    … Expand
  52. TerrickLiu
    Sep 12, 2023
    2
    Is this a 2023 video games? And the producer call it the same experience as a 2018 video game which is?
  53. Markes184
    Sep 12, 2023
    9
    Very good game, the only thing that annoys me is the partner who comes in front of the gun in battles.
  54. magnumdb
    Sep 12, 2023
    6
    I’m 10 hours in. I’ve done multiple story mission and 2 open world quests.

    Let me start with what I like. Graphics looks pretty darn good, by and large. There’s some weird anomalies like the wide eyed stare, and there are visual glitches. Some planets look a bit weak but those total 5% of what I’ve seen. The other 95% looks great - textures and models of all the gear, the human built    I’m 10 hours in. I’ve done multiple story mission and 2 open world quests.

    Let me start with what I like.

    Graphics looks pretty darn good, by and large. There’s some weird anomalies like the wide eyed stare, and there are visual glitches. Some planets look a bit weak but those total 5% of what I’ve seen. The other 95% looks great - textures and models of all the gear, the human built environments, all beautiful.

    Voice acting is usually ok. There’s a lot of cartoony over the top voices that sound like sarcasm. Music is beautiful. It all loads pretty fast on my Series S, thank goodness because of the many loading screens. I don’t think I’m out of the first act of the main story but I’m following along, enough - it’s fine!

    Already from my positives though you can see it’s not blown me away really.

    The bad:

    The games mechanics are confusing, it is taking me forever to understand how I store, trade, keep, upgrade, etc all the gear. Hard to understand menu navigation when traveling, hard to understand how to survey planets (I spent 2 hours on my first planet going in circles until I regretfully looked up help online. There are annoying enemy bugs where they clip through walls; they get me but I can’t get them. They blend into the environment too much; the areas colors are usually just 2-3 main similar colors, and muted and muddy. Many times I can’t see the enemy because they wear those same colors plus all the smoke hides everyone.

    I hate getting around. We are given an entire universe, but no great way to traverse it. Menu systems for ship travel are complex, confusing, and convoluted. Opening up a menu, selecting a planet, traveling, getting to the planet, but not actually landing on it, opening the menu, again, selecting an area on the planet, traveling again, watching the cut scene of the ship landing… terrible. Sometimes the planet needs to scan you for contraband, other times, not. Sometimes you can leave directly from being docked, other times you have to undock yourself. When you’re on the planet, you can’t run for long without running out of oxygen, that can run out even faster if you’re over encumbered, and when you’re over encumbered, you can’t fast travel. There are no vehicles. And you are running around these empty planets with nothing really interesting to do or look at as you make your way to the one area to get an artifact, or special ability or resource/trait. You can fast travel back to your ship… but only if you aren’t encumbered.

    Characters talk over each other all the time. The gunplay has been a struggle. Aiming either feels like I am pulling the cursor through syrup or it has a booster engine and shoots my crosshair across the screen if I barely touch it. I’ve tried so many aim sensitivity settings but I think I am making small improvements only because I am learning to work within these confines. I have yet to find much ammo for one of the guns I really want to use.

    Speaking of guns - what the actual EFF is with the lack of automatic ammo pick up? To get ammo for your gun, you have to pick up a gun that uses the same ammo. The ammo will automatically show up on your HUD but now you have to do something with the gun. With such limited inventory, I am dropping the guns all the time, and it really slows down the momentum of the game. . After spending 15 minutes walking in a slow straight line across a boring empty planet, when I finally find enemies to shoot, I don’t want to spend most of that time opening my menu to drop guns. Even a game considered one of the most realistic, RDR2, allows you to just walk near an enemy and the ammo is automatically picked up.

    There is some good, but at this point there isn’t enough good to make me want to leave the main story again. At the moment, it’s entertaining enough that I will continue the main story for now, but I have a lot of other games I want to get to and star field has felt more like it’s stealing my time more than me enjoying my time with it.    … Expand
  55. SMILy1989
    Sep 12, 2023
    10
    It is exactly what i have expected, and i Love it. You can do so much stuff. Just get in to it, you will play at least 100 hours for shure.
  56. Unonimy
    Sep 12, 2023
    8
    Personally, I don't understand why many are crying about optimization, because this is a massive game and its requirements was already visible on steam . Also on my setup Starfield runs better than Fallout76. But sometimes I feel like I'm playing some old game because of the npc dialogues which I feel haven't changed since the days of skyrim...
  57. DiegoArmando
    Sep 11, 2023
    1
    This is not 2023 year game, awful visual and animations, outdated physics. May be you hope on great story, adventure? This game exclusively boring.
  58. niko9942
    Sep 11, 2023
    10
    Excellent game. If you enjoy Fallout and other Bathesda games you will love it. It's by far my favorite game of all time.
  59. balnog
    Sep 8, 2023
    4
    Setting aside the disappointment at how space travel is handled, and the constant loading screens (thankfully they're not too slow on an nvme drive), it's the bugs and rotten frame rate that tears the game down for me. I've had crashes selling items at the kiosk, inventory UI just stopping working, NPCs standing through chairs, NPCs not reacting to walking into forbidden areas, no DLSS,Setting aside the disappointment at how space travel is handled, and the constant loading screens (thankfully they're not too slow on an nvme drive), it's the bugs and rotten frame rate that tears the game down for me. I've had crashes selling items at the kiosk, inventory UI just stopping working, NPCs standing through chairs, NPCs not reacting to walking into forbidden areas, no DLSS, last gen graphics in places... its just all of that together that spoils the experience. That you encounter all of this within the first hour is the icing on the cake, it speaks to a lack of caring on the Bethesda side, they have to had seen these problems themselves yet they think it's good enough.

    I really hope I can come back to revise the score after a patch or two...    … Expand
  60. krockdur
    Sep 11, 2023
    9
    Science fiction fans, you will be delighted!

    The few youthful flaws are quickly erased by the sum of the qualities. The game will only get better over time and, like Skyrim, I'll still be playing it ten years from now. Exploration of biomes, space combat, invasion of bases, construction of ships, crafting, very cool quest sequences, enemy AI are the main positive points of this    Science fiction fans, you will be delighted!

    The few youthful flaws are quickly erased by the sum of the qualities. The game will only get better over time and, like Skyrim, I'll still be playing it ten years from now.

    Exploration of biomes, space combat, invasion of bases, construction of ships, crafting, very cool quest sequences, enemy AI are the main positive points of this title.

    Two negative points for me: the AI of the companions and the lip synchronization of the French version.

    But what a fun game!    … Expand
  61. AJ2DaMax
    Sep 11, 2023
    10
    I love this Game it's enjoyable. I can't wait till the Mods really kick-off
  62. MrSupreme
    Sep 11, 2023
    3
    It just feels so empty, along with graphics that looks 6years old and such bad optimization that not even a A770 Arc does not meet the minimum requirements but an 1070 ti does, somehow boggles my mind.
    Low framerate with such graphics and bad UI makes we wonder what the devs thought when releasing the game in such a state.
    Story seems eh at most, some ok side quests so far. Feels like    It just feels so empty, along with graphics that looks 6years old and such bad optimization that not even a A770 Arc does not meet the minimum requirements but an 1070 ti does, somehow boggles my mind.
    Low framerate with such graphics and bad UI makes we wonder what the devs thought when releasing the game in such a state.
    Story seems eh at most, some ok side quests so far.
    Feels like they tried doing a lot but there is no meat behind any of it, the only good thing is the ship builder honestly.
    At least Diablo 4 had a good graphics and story.
    Might up dropping starfield since Gamepass version apparently cant have SFSE to run most mods so not even mods can save the game for me.    … Expand
  63. mxd4n13l0n
    Sep 11, 2023
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I've just played 33 hours so far and I'm just level 16. Focusing on side quests and maxing out tech and science. I've just had an enlightened conversation with Juno (yeah, the probe from NASA which went to Jupiter and all the Jovian system. Literally that side quest made me cry… Expand
  64. taboo_
    Sep 11, 2023
    2
    Middling to say the least.

    It's such a dramatic step backward in sense of exploration and thrill of discovery compared to previous Bethesda games. It's so disjointed with all the loading screens. There's a lack of a map when exploring somewhere so you have no idea where anything else or if you've cleared a "dungeon". It's leaned too heavily into things Bethesda ISN'T known for (base    Middling to say the least.

    It's such a dramatic step backward in sense of exploration and thrill of discovery compared to previous Bethesda games.

    It's so disjointed with all the loading screens. There's a lack of a map when exploring somewhere so you have no idea where anything else or if you've cleared a "dungeon". It's leaned too heavily into things Bethesda ISN'T known for (base building/resource gathering) and forgotten the roots that Bethesda IS loved for. Exploration and a sense of an expansive world to get side tracked in while on another mission. The gunplay and weapon variety is a nice step forward, but even then nothing that other games don't do much better.

    The optimisation is awful for a game that looks mid tier, or a few years dated graphically.    … Expand
  65. jamielikesyou
    Sep 11, 2023
    2
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. An awful blend of Mass Effect, NMS/Elite, Destiny 2 and every Bethesda game you've already played. Swirled together in a toilet to water down every element that made those games special. They did add some game-breaking new {{features}} err, bugs along with pages on pages of unfilterable menus to wade through compressed in a UI that looks like an Alpha build mock up. Anything another game can do in 2 clicks, this one will make you page through to do nearly everything - travel, manage inventory, assign crew, etc. This is not a game that can be redeemed with mods - there are fundamental flaws in game design, balance, performance and QA testing that make this a burden to play.

    They also managed to make a far worse ending than Mass Effect 3, taking away all player choice and agency. A boring, anti-climatic denouement that feels meaningless and devoid of meaning or substance.

    The worst Bethesda game since Redguard.    … Expand
  66. Ixniyevonniy
    Sep 11, 2023
    8
    Advertisement of this game is a complete disaster. Bethesda talked about new features and the new style just for their own player, for the player of Skyrim and Fallout. Not surprising the common player was confused! If you played Bethesda games for a bit, you'd know for sure what to expect from Starfield. Even if there is word "space" in advertisement, you would never draw a parallel withAdvertisement of this game is a complete disaster. Bethesda talked about new features and the new style just for their own player, for the player of Skyrim and Fallout. Not surprising the common player was confused! If you played Bethesda games for a bit, you'd know for sure what to expect from Starfield. Even if there is word "space" in advertisement, you would never draw a parallel with any space simulation game. It's not a space simulation game. And it was never called so. It barely even looked like it in visual trailers.

    But on the other hand, what they should've said? "We have some space, but what most important is the amount of good quests and dialogues, awesome narrative, great open world and thousands possibilities!" Everyone already heard that. And everyone already played it. Played it in all the Fallout and all the Elder Scrolls games.

    Yeah, probably they should've said that narrative in this game is better than it ever was. Yeah, probably they should've said that side quests are just as great as always and the giant world is unchained as it never was. NPCs in the cities talk about real things, when they say something it means something.

    The only bug I saw during playthrough is a cabinet drawer physically stuck in itself. Did you see amount of items their physical engine is capable of handling without any stutter? That's insane progress on the engine. Also I think they should've introduced the complete modding capabilities right at the launch and even advertise them, show something. Everyone know it's a strongest part of Bethesda game. That's a great miss.

    In conclusion, the game will be played a lot and widely. Modding will be insane, every now and then I see potential to mod something. I do not see continuation of this franchise though and that's a bit concerning.    … Expand
  67. Shadron
    Sep 11, 2023
    9
    I'm personally having a blast playing the game. The relaxing & casual pace of everything resonates with me. If you enjoyed Fallout 4 and Skyrim, you'll most likely enjoy Starfield. The graphics are descent and definetly better than 2 previously mentioned games. Lots of stuff to do and get sidetracked on. I personally like the skill point progression system. Feels like you have to actuallyI'm personally having a blast playing the game. The relaxing & casual pace of everything resonates with me. If you enjoyed Fallout 4 and Skyrim, you'll most likely enjoy Starfield. The graphics are descent and definetly better than 2 previously mentioned games. Lots of stuff to do and get sidetracked on. I personally like the skill point progression system. Feels like you have to actually earn them. Add in the ship building fun, it's an all round great game. My most recent game was Diablo IV and I really enjoyed it until endgame. I really had no desire to go back in to it because of lack of content. But I can definitely see Starfield having enough content to keep me coming back.… Expand
  68. Gryffus
    Sep 11, 2023
    0
    More lies from Todd again, mediocre in everything, base building is a joke, scanning planets is boring and annoying, main history is just repeat the same thing 10 times if you want the best gear, weapons for sure they hold content for dlcs and mods to fix it and release early like every bethesda game.
  69. DrNunpuncher
    Sep 11, 2023
    2
    I'm a huge fan of space exploration games No Man's Sky and Elite Dangerous being two of my favorites and honestly if you want to have a fun journey through space just play one of those instead.

    Maybe the most boring Bethesda game I've ever played, The main story is uninteresting and most of the characters you meet are beyond generic. Also having you do most of your "exploration" through    I'm a huge fan of space exploration games No Man's Sky and Elite Dangerous being two of my favorites and honestly if you want to have a fun journey through space just play one of those instead.

    Maybe the most boring Bethesda game I've ever played, The main story is uninteresting and most of the characters you meet are beyond generic. Also having you do most of your "exploration" through menus and loading screens is a baffling decision to me. If you liked Fallout 3 you'll love this game because it plays the exact same if there's one thing you can commend Bethesda for it's sticking to their roots for better or in this case for worse, the creation engine needs an overhaul.    … Expand
  70. Canliberk
    Sep 11, 2023
    5
    Playing this game makes me want to play other games.

    It is like a combination of Fallout 4, Mass Effect and No Man's Sky, but taken all the mediocre aspects of each game. Combat / Exploration / Looting worked much better on Fallout 4. Space Theme and world building was much better on Mass Effect series Space exploration / combat was much better on No Mans Sky. Performance is    Playing this game makes me want to play other games.

    It is like a combination of Fallout 4, Mass Effect and No Man's Sky, but taken all the mediocre aspects of each game.

    Combat / Exploration / Looting worked much better on Fallout 4.
    Space Theme and world building was much better on Mass Effect series
    Space exploration / combat was much better on No Mans Sky.

    Performance is sadly not good at the launch state. UI is clunky and gets in the way too much. Graphics are good - not masterpiece but good.    … Expand
  71. pigroach
    Sep 11, 2023
    6
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The ten scores are just as cringe as the zero scores, haters hating and blinkered fans white knighting. It's not a terrible game but definitely not even close to being a ten either. It's a really mediocre effort tbh. The main plot is essentially a fetch quest, the side quests can occasionally be more interesting. The ai is poor and the npcs are wooden and not very memorable. It's typical Bethesda fair. The game and graphics are dated If this came out in 2011 instead of Skyrim for example then yeah this would seem much better. Didn't have any problems running this on the highest settings but yeah even on those settings it looks bad. They really need to ditch this archaic engine and get with UE5 or something more worthy. Not something I will bother finishing.… Expand
  72. Dave_Nosdivad
    Sep 11, 2023
    3
    I was so hyped about this game...once more I was misled by Todd Howard and that is all on me!
    He promised exploration which is minimal. It's a space game without "space". They called it an RPG without dialogues with a role-play system.
  73. LMarks44
    Sep 11, 2023
    0
    Incredibly overrated, by no means GOTY material, cannot understand all of these 10/10 reviews
    I expected so much more for how long we waited.
    Let me start by saying that I love Bethesda games. Fallout 3 is one of my all time favorites, as is Skyrim. I liked Fallout 4 and I even like and defend Fallout 76, so I am definitely not anti Bethesda. I've played for around 40 hours now and    Incredibly overrated, by no means GOTY material, cannot understand all of these 10/10 reviews
    I expected so much more for how long we waited.

    Let me start by saying that I love Bethesda games. Fallout 3 is one of my all time favorites, as is Skyrim. I liked Fallout 4 and I even like and defend Fallout 76, so I am definitely not anti Bethesda.

    I've played for around 40 hours now and finished the main quest, so I believe I am at a point where I can say I'm well acquainted with the game.
    * The fast travel is needlessly complicated, so many loading screens, so much to do, just to get from point A to point B.

    * There are plenty of bugs. People online saying it doesn't have bugs are lying. This game has been far more buggy to me than Skyrim.

    * The graphics are nothing special and I am playing on a year old Alienware PC. My settings are ultra high def.
    The graphics are inferior compared to Cyberpunk or Witcher 3.

    * The quests and NPCs so far have all been completely non memorable. Nothing has tugged at my emotions. No moral dilemmas. Go fetch this, go get that. I am so incredibly underwhelmed by the quests and NPCs.

    * The NPCs all have bulging eyes. Like all of them. It really ruins immersion because how weird they all look.

    * There is no atmospheric story telling in this game and I think that is what is truly bothering me most. You know how in the Fallouts you constantly find scenes or skeletons or unmarked locations that tell you a story without telling you a story? I have seen none of that in this game, anywhere, like not even one instance. So many abandoned buildings you cannot access. Nothing on the roofs. They didn't even write books for this game, like in the Elder Scrolls. Every book you find is public domain like Moby Dck etc. I have yet to find any notes or computer entries that offer lore or just atmosphere, everything you find is quest essential. The planets really are truly barren. Like on Earth, you can find the remains of the St. Louis Arch and a few other landmarks but literally everything else is sand. Really? Really???No roads or anything left of New York or.....nothing? But the arch is still standing.

    * It has been clear since Fallout 4 that Bethesda is trying to tone down mature content to make their games playable to a more wide age range. While mature content is NOT mandatory for a good game, they need to understand that their target audience for games like this is still, and always will be, adults. You don't have to make it rated R, but PG13 is a good balance. There is so little violence, gore, adult themes, language in this game, that I could easily let my 6 year old play it, but he'd be bored out of his mind with all the loading screens. What they captured in Fallout 3, in terms of maturity, was PERFECT. You didn't have nudity. The cursing wasn't excessive. It was very well balanced. I implore them to return to making adult games for adults.

    ***My next complaint, I think Bethesda was really trying to do a good thing, I do, but this is not how to do it. I think they had the best intentions and were trying to be more inclusive.
    I do not understand why female bodies and female faces and female haircuts are pretty much non existent in this game. As someone who identifies as female, I feel this is a bit misogynistic. I do not feel this is inclusive regarding my gender identity. My character is flat chested with no curves and cannot be given female features, and this applies to all other female characters in the game. I wish I could attach pictures of my character, it's sad. I think they were going for non binary or androgynous, which it's wonderful they are trying to include our LGTBQ+ friends in your games. Our non binary friends deserve to be included! But consider our loved ones who are trans and going through transition from M to F. They already have body dysmorphia and this game is a great opportunity for them to role play in the body they want----a female body---only to see that they cannot have breasts or curves. I URGE Bethesda to consider going back to the body types used in Fallout 4/Skyrim, and to be inclusive for all body types and genders. Allow players to be more masculine or more feminine. I am currently waiting for mods so that I can make a character body that identifies with my gender identity.

    I know you cannot please everyone. I know that programming and creating a game is incredibly hard work and that their team put in countless hours, sweat, tears, and lost sleep.

    I encourage Bethesda to please read through these reviews and try to address what you can. The game is still new and there is plenty of time to win over the community.    … Expand
  74. firebrx
    Sep 11, 2023
    10
    Just go for it! Nice storyline and gameplay, The FPS gameplay is very fun! It is a game that I want to complete 100%
  75. Marco35300
    Sep 11, 2023
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Jogo muito bom otimo gameplay, infelismente ñ teve uma otima avaliação por causa do davyjones esse sonysta, muito sonysta disse que iria vir aqui só para dar uma má avaliação ao game muito triste, vcs deviam ir mais ao fundo disso. Salve a pagina enquanto o xbox existir eu serei feliz… Expand
  76. Zaid1996
    Sep 11, 2023
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. De los mejores juegos de espacio abierto no solo mundo está ala altura de juegos como Halo Reach, Red Dead 2, GTA V sin duda lo mejor en lo que va del año junto con Zelda, Pikmin 4 y Mario Wonder comprenlo no se arrepentirán compre una SERIES X solo por ese juego no como la porquería de PS5… Expand
  77. Kaito12
    Sep 11, 2023
    10
    Starfield Good no escuchen lo de la mala reseña son hater que vinieron de arnia para poner reseñar sin jugar y se volvieron ir
  78. wstml555
    Sep 11, 2023
    0
    This game is complete garbage. The critic reviewers giving this game highs core i believe are just shilling for Bethesba.
    This game is completely boring, all you do is walk, run around shooting people and creatures, and when you arenot doing that are tasked with aimlessly talking to people. When asked to give a response, usually four choices, it doesnt matter what you choose as it will    This game is complete garbage. The critic reviewers giving this game highs core i believe are just shilling for Bethesba.
    This game is completely boring, all you do is walk, run around shooting people and creatures, and when you arenot doing that are tasked with aimlessly talking to people. When asked to give a response, usually four choices, it doesnt matter what you choose as it will just guide you to make the right decision.
    For a game in which you think you'd be able to do space exploration, there is ZERO of it. There is no enjoyment in travelling to a planet like a simulator as you just fast jump to that planet.
    Take away all the cutscenes and dialogue scnes and you are left with very little gameplay.
    If you are thinking of buying the game, i suggest watching walkthroughs first and seeing just how utterly boring this game is.    … Expand
  79. NeroST
    Sep 8, 2023
    10
    Best game i really liked it, i hope you will give it try and see for yourself, i recommend it
  80. PS4_PC_LIFE
    Sep 11, 2023
    0
    What a garbage game, who's dumb idea was it put in a bunch of woke crap into the game, they must of hired what's her face, the one that's responsible for a lot of AAA games turning to crap, The name that should never be spoken, must be her doing. Had to refund it, couldn't stand the idiocy of it.
  81. narrativegaming
    Sep 11, 2023
    0
    Zero negative critic reviews... So much for "critic-ism"! What an absolute joke of an industry. Clown world. Loading screen and cut-scene simulator.
  82. Das_Boots
    Sep 11, 2023
    0
    this game sucks and its almost criminal ; the fact it sold 5 mil copies is proof ppl dont care about the quality of games that come out of development
  83. Kuramaa
    Sep 11, 2023
    0
    I mean, there's nothing of what they promise us.. Do they even try?
    How many people said, would be better if they concentrate their workers on a small amount of planet, make them very different, full explorable, with more life or at least non all the same,no loading screen every seconds and some personality to the enemy, npc..
  84. Wokefield
    Sep 11, 2023
    0
    Let me start by saying that I feel like I was cheated out of my hard earned money, not because of the gameplay, but because of how much they are forcing their one sided opinions on people. Nowhere does Bethesda warn you about just how one sided / woke they made this game. I have over 90 hours in this game so I feel like I have a good perspective of what Starfield brings to the table.Let me start by saying that I feel like I was cheated out of my hard earned money, not because of the gameplay, but because of how much they are forcing their one sided opinions on people. Nowhere does Bethesda warn you about just how one sided / woke they made this game. I have over 90 hours in this game so I feel like I have a good perspective of what Starfield brings to the table. Here's a summary:


    1. Almost every important NPC from most store owners, military generals / commanders, the leader of Constellation, the supervisor leading the mining expedition at the start of the game, and even the president of the United Colonies, are all women. When it comes to a position of power or leadership, females very obviously and deliberately dominate every sector. The only time that a white male character is in a position of real leadership, is the leader of the Crimson Fleet, one of the main villains of the game. It's very obvious the developers hate white males, as they are a huge minority. 2. You can tell just how "diverse" the developers are by looking at the random civilians and guards in every city. In 90 hours of gameplay, Most of the guards / soldiers have been either black males or females ( of all races ), and females do dominate the soldiers / guards as well. The civilians consist of both genders, but almost exclusively Black or Asian. It's very rare to find white males anywhere in any cities, and the only places I usually find them is either in the ghetto of every city, or working the mines. With the way the world is going today, this maybe seems like a not too distant reality anyway. 3. If you are religious and believe in God, you will be very disappointed here. This game actively tries to find some sort of "scientific facts" to persuade people into thinking God isn't real. None of the main companions believe in God, and the only one that comes close believes in the "great serpent", in which that religion is viewed as a cult by almost every NPC. 4. When you create your character, you can choose your "body type" and "walk type" between Male or Female, and then you get the privilege to choose your pronouns. You can either be a He, a She, or a They. This one I am not as bothered by as this only revolves around your personal character. You can be a straight male if you want ( Although every romance companion is Bi ). The problem I have with the pronouns is that the Left all say "pronouns are no big deal" but when someone creates a mod to remove pronouns in the character creation for people who don't want to participate in that either due to religion or another reason, are attacked by the Left for their personal preferences. Very hypocritical and selfish of them to force everyone to share their views or get attacked, even though "It's not a big deal". If someone is going to be paying all that money for a game, they should have the freedom to play it how they want personally.


    5. There is a Transgender main character in the game ( part of one of the main side questlines ), but they try to be a little more cautious about the wording on this in the game by calling them a clone. You are pretty much forced to support this character throughout the questline even if you have different beliefs. Overall, the choice to purchase this game is entirely up to you. If you are into everything I mentioned earlier, this game is absolutely for you. But for those that share different beliefs and views, I would highly recommend avoiding the game until they either make it more diverse without the white male oppression, or a mod fixes it. They deliberately hid this aspect of the game until people purchased it and played enough to the point of no longer able to get a refund, and that was the wrong approach from Bethesda. Why can't we have a modern game where people can express themselves without being forced to a single ideology that they might not agree on? In my opinion, this game has to be one of the most racist / sexist games against White males that I have ever played. The gameplay itself is very fun ( other than the limits on exploration ) and there is a lot to do in terms of side activities, base / ship building, combat, etc. So it's not all bad. It all depends on your own personal views. Would it have been great for them to support both sides? Absolutely, but unfortunately that's not how the world is going. For me personally, this game is a 0/10 as the world building is immersion breaking.    … Expand
  85. Oscarion2024
    Sep 11, 2023
    1
    Es un juego malo, básicamente bethesda reciclo lo que ya tenía de sus juegos anteriores y lo metió a este, no es acordé al año en el que sale, tenía muy altas espectativas de este juego pero en fin pasará sin pena ni gloria.
  86. BubaGump
    Sep 8, 2023
    9
    It is absolutely mandatory that you are familiar with and like Bethesda games like Fallout and Skyrim. That said. The game has an excellent depth of content, making you feel small in a large universe. Just like reality, empty and beautiful planets make us feel lonely and lucky. Big cities like New Atlantis, Neon and Akila have more side quests and stories than the main quest itself, andIt is absolutely mandatory that you are familiar with and like Bethesda games like Fallout and Skyrim. That said. The game has an excellent depth of content, making you feel small in a large universe. Just like reality, empty and beautiful planets make us feel lonely and lucky. Big cities like New Atlantis, Neon and Akila have more side quests and stories than the main quest itself, and that's amazing. The battle system is very good, I believe thanks to the Doom team. The inventory and skills menu is very easy and simple to use. The map is complex and takes time to get used to. Optimization isn't good, the engine doesn't make things fluid as it should. The indoors and landscapes of the planets are beautiful, but the NPCs are ugly (except named characters). The game deserves 9 because it is not easy to create such a vast and rich universe. In my opinion, it delivers what it promises.… Expand
  87. PhillipB82
    Sep 11, 2023
    0
    Outdated graphics, with current-day politics,

    One-sided worldview has been shoved down our throats for too long. if Bethesda really cared about diversity and inclusion. that should include people who disagree with them on social issues, like whole countries like China, Africa, Russia, Saudi Arabia and so on.
  88. ClaudioRiver81
    Sep 10, 2023
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Una obra maestra de Starfield. Innovación tanto en lo narrativo como en lo jugable. A diferencia de los sonyers, yo si jugué al juego. Con mis más de 50 hs de juego, puedo afirmar que es el juego mejor optimizado de Bethesda, casi libre de bugs. Juego inmenso, con muchos arcos narrativos. Varias minis historias, muy bien narradas. Perfecta iluminación y físicas muy avanzadas. Inmersivo como ningún otro juego. Obra maestra, pieza infalable para los roleros.… Expand
  89. Kirnl
    Sep 11, 2023
    1
    A solid disappointment. Loading screen sim. exploration is a joke you go out to a cave that's empty or abandoned base to find some useless cups and pencils. for some reason ground vehicles don't exist in a space fairing universe which makes exploration even worse with you character that can only sprint the distance of your average gamer. Design intent to keep us trapped slowly movingA solid disappointment. Loading screen sim. exploration is a joke you go out to a cave that's empty or abandoned base to find some useless cups and pencils. for some reason ground vehicles don't exist in a space fairing universe which makes exploration even worse with you character that can only sprint the distance of your average gamer. Design intent to keep us trapped slowly moving across planets to drive up numbers and subs on game pass. disgusting.… Expand
  90. wsjacobi
    Sep 11, 2023
    0
    this game is so boring and empty, easy skip. I cant believe we waited so long for this to come out for it to be such a boring reedition of outer space travel. Also it looks just like no mans sky
  91. KeboRIpper
    Sep 11, 2023
    9
    is a good game, and in my opinion is impossible to not compare it with fallout or skyrim, but i think the game has its own identity, the gunplay and world is actually goo and i enjoyed it a lot, and im still playing it because for me its a good AAA game, not the best, but enough for me
  92. SilverOrlov
    Sep 11, 2023
    3
    I will not list here all the problems of that game because the vast majority of those who use this site already know them. Legally or not, some people played this game, while others had the opportunity to enjoy jokes and sarcasm about the problems of this game in YouTube videos. I will only write about why I gave this product such a low rating. Brain side: I completely agree with all theI will not list here all the problems of that game because the vast majority of those who use this site already know them. Legally or not, some people played this game, while others had the opportunity to enjoy jokes and sarcasm about the problems of this game in YouTube videos. I will only write about why I gave this product such a low rating. Brain side: I completely agree with all the negative reviews (yes, before writing this text, it was interesting for me to read why the game is criticized by the “red” ratings, and why the game is still praised by the “green” ratings)... The side of feelings: you know... I'm catastrophically tired and angry about what's happening with the gaming industry in recent years. I'm tired of making jokes like "to hell with it, we have an indie industry." I'm tired of the fact that many gamers forgive and even !praise! such products, motivating creators to make further pseudo-games like this one. If earlier there were a lot of big games from big companies that were interesting to play, then in recent years I’ve been increasingly thinking that I’m not interested in spending the full price tag on some kind of garbage in a beautiful wrapper. And thank you if this wrapper is really beautiful and is not stuffed with a million bugs.
    I am tired to be angry to see "a big game industry" in such a mess in 2023 because of so-calling effective managers. Because it so happens that in the modern World big games are made not by those who like to create games, but by those who simply want to suck as much money out of you as possible. And the most disgusting thing is that they don’t give anything for it except false promises and no less false apologies. I'm so tired of all this that EVERY! similar pseudo-games in future will receive no more than 3 points from me (graphics, music, idea). I'm over it.    … Expand
  93. oldmangray
    Sep 11, 2023
    9
    Eurgh. The console wars. I thought we'd seen the worst in '07 when PS3 and 360 went head to head and us teenage numpties chose sides pointlessly for 5+ years. No surprise it's happening to the same extent given PS has been unfortunately excluded from Bethesda titles. Imagine when Elder Scrolls comes out
  94. JTuesday
    Sep 11, 2023
    8
    Bethesda's long awaited new universe is a polarizing marvel. It fails in places very important to some and insignificant to others.

    The engine which powers Bethesda games provides many technical limitations, but it is also the source of Bethesda's immense ability to create living persistent worlds. Your enjoyment of Starfield is reliant on which you prioritize. Unfortunately, those    Bethesda's long awaited new universe is a polarizing marvel. It fails in places very important to some and insignificant to others.

    The engine which powers Bethesda games provides many technical limitations, but it is also the source of Bethesda's immense ability to create living persistent worlds. Your enjoyment of Starfield is reliant on which you prioritize.

    Unfortunately, those technical limitations, cracks in the experience, which in past titles were so easily airbrushed away, are now as wide and deep as canyons. They are glaring indictments of Bethesda's inability to move engines. Bethesda has so much time and effort invested in their jalopy of an engine it would mean a disastrous loss of productivity to switch at this point.

    That being said, the design choices that hurt the most seem informed by technical limitation. I do not understand for the life of me why in-menu fast-travel is so prominent in a game centered around space ships. I understand the need to remove the void of travel to provide a tighter narrative experience, but space sims have had warp drives since the 80s, Starfield has warp (grav) drives. That, IS your fast travel system. Menu travel makes a universe of 100s of planets feel as small as Skyrim.

    Bethesda's RPGs have historically had terrible menus so it stands to reason that the their games feel the best when you are out of them for long stretches. Unfortunately, Starfield is their most menu heavy game to date. Half the game is played in menus. I understand that releasing on consoles creates limitations, such as requiring annoying lists of equipment, but why, when playing on a keyboard, are the keys that have similar functions different depending on what I'm doing? Its an unintuitive and frustrating mess.

    Starfield excels at many things. The scope of the content is massive. Its easy to b-line it through the main storyline and treat the other quests as "side-quests", but they are anything but. These are fully voice acted narratives that take you around the galaxy and feel like Starfield launched with built in DLC. The writing is rough in areas, but never outwrite bad and the characters are complex and deep.

    Ship building is well implemented, not being too restrictive or complex, while still feeling like there is some engineering complexity to conquer. It would have been great if exotic ship part blueprints were found as loot or just more parts in general, but the feature is a highlight, regardless.

    Combat is, what you would expect from an RPG shooter. Bullet sponge slogs or insignificant short scuffles. Rarely can they find the sweet spot. The savior here is the weapon design, which are both pleasing and interesting. The AI does an admirable job while in combat, but falls back on decades old design of AI "Amnesia". Stay hidden for long enough, and they will go about their day, like you didn't just murder half of them 30 seconds ago.

    In many ways Bethesda RPGs are platforms on which to build your own experience; playing how you want, modding how you please, changing what you don't like, and adding more of that which you do. The promise of community improvements and content goes a long way with some, and means little to others.

    Its easy to fault Starfield. The Bethesda formula and trademark Bethesda jank are getting stale. The limitation of the technology are on full display. The content is deep in odd places and shallow where it often counts the most. Starfield is the best Bethesda RPG since Morrowind, but games are in a different place. Bethesda's inability to grow in the right direction, means Starfield falls short of reaching the stars.    … Expand
  95. vectrax
    Sep 11, 2023
    2
    Woke = Authoritarian. The woke ideology wants to tell you what thoughts you're allowed to have, what words you're allowed to speak and what ideas you're allowed to consider. It tells you what you need to do to be a good person, and what you can't do if you want to be a good person. What you need to do to be accepted in society and what's going to get you cancelled. It wants to controlWoke = Authoritarian. The woke ideology wants to tell you what thoughts you're allowed to have, what words you're allowed to speak and what ideas you're allowed to consider. It tells you what you need to do to be a good person, and what you can't do if you want to be a good person. What you need to do to be accepted in society and what's going to get you cancelled. It wants to control every aspect of who you are and how you present yourself to the world, and it's all supported and enforced by the establishment.

    People who identify as "woke" have a rigid parochial set of values and beliefs that they've ignorantly mistaken for objective truth. A system of values that they believe are fundamentally good and morally righteous. A set of values that they're convinced are undeniably correct and necessary to human happiness. A set of values they're so committed to that they've adopted a militant and grossly intolerant attitude towards anyone who happens to have different values or anyone who happens to believe things other than what they themselves have mistaken for objective truth.

    The existence of people who don't share their values makes them so furious that they've convinced themselves that these are bad people who need to be shut down and punished through a deeply malicious combination of lies and intimidation they've attempted to impose their personal values on everyone, smearing anyone who says something they disagree with as sexist, racist, homophobic, transphobic and any number of other "ist's" and "ic's".

    Through doing this they've destroyed many people's lives and brought us all cultural impoverishment and social decline. Moreover through a rabid commitment to an entirely irrational gender ideology which they've convinced themselves is morally righteous they've allowed predatory men to encroach upon women's spaces all around the world and openly engage in child grooming in public.

    They champion diversity but they don't like diversity of ideas. They champion Liberty, but they don't like freedom of speech. They preach about social justice on a phone made by a child slave. They use the expression "Words have consequences" entirely oblivious to how Fascistic that sounds. In short they're hypocrites of the highest order. They are all of those things they claimed to hate the most. Bigots, Authoritarians and Bullies.

    Here's a song about the situation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SO-yVHaAlyA    … Expand
  96. Mehrab4K
    Sep 11, 2023
    10
    Im fully recommend playing on pc with amd hardware for better experience. On amd hardware you have great experience with FSR 2.2.1. Hopefully FSR 3.0 coming to starfield too on both pc and Xbox series X|S
  97. Marloren
    Sep 11, 2023
    0
    Начнем по порядку, игра выглядит шикарно тут нет смысла спорить, графически она сделана красиво, но вот что меня выбивает из погружения в игру
    НПС
    1) Исчезают перед дверьми, обливион, передает плотный привет 2) Застревают в воде/траве/кустах/текстурах 3) Боевой искусственный интеллект с тобой не воюет. Интерфейс 1) Интуитивно непонятно(что за цифры на этих пушках), тебя не погружают    Начнем по порядку, игра выглядит шикарно тут нет смысла спорить, графически она сделана красиво, но вот что меня выбивает из погружения в игру
    НПС
    1) Исчезают перед дверьми, обливион, передает плотный привет
    2) Застревают в воде/траве/кустах/текстурах
    3) Боевой искусственный интеллект с тобой не воюет.
    Интерфейс
    1) Интуитивно непонятно(что за цифры на этих пушках), тебя не погружают игру, не объясняют как ей пользоваться, просто говорят, на держи учись.
    2) На все разные кнопки, и без шуток их реально много, на земле одна и та же кнопка открыть планетарную карту и бросить гранату, ну это блять шутка.
    3) Ещё одна шутка которую стоит оценить по достоинству это худ корабля, опять таки что ты на техническом столе изучать хрен его знает.
    4) Выполнить квесты для прокачки навыков, реально?
    Геймплей
    1) Отсутствующая регистрация попаданий.
    2) Нет импакта от оружия.
    3) Нет ощущения сложности, ты на первом уровне херачишь 5-12. Вопрос какой смысл в этих хелфбарах если они ни о чем не говорят, как и уровни в целом.
    4) Отсутствующая экономика в игре, чтобы вы понимали когда я первый раз прибыл на землю и при продаже инвентаря(Первые 15-20 минут геймплея) у меня было 13 тысяч кредитов. Нет это не девальвация, достаточно неплохой крейсер там стоит 240 тысяч.
    Сюжет
    1) Ты красивый, самый сексуальный, самый сильный и особенный, в очередной раз так интересно смотреть как Bethesda идет по одному и тому же шаблону.
    2) Многие говорят перетерпи 10-15 часов чтобы тебе начала нравится эта игра. Предлагаю следующее может купите сейчас, а когда-нибудь потом через несколько лет выйдет игра от Bethesda, которая реально будет хороша и вот тогда ваше ожидание будет напрасно. Я к чему веду. Если игру реально нужно терпеть, чтобы получать от неё удовольствие, то может с игрой что-то не так?
    3) Высадился на неизвестной планете, увидел неизведанную точку, есть два варианта: Идти пешком несколько километров, или ещё минимум три загрузочных экрана. Чувствуете бесшовность
    4) Душно, иди поговори там, постреляй их, вернись туда. 24 век на дворе люди изобрели гипердвигатели но не изобрели межгалактическую связь, а нет, изобрели, но в чем тогда проблема, я ведь дистанционно не могу связаться с нужным человеком и сказать что миссия выполнена, мне надо лететь через НЕСКОЛЬКО ЕБАНЫХ СИСТЕМ, чтобы банально сдать квест. Вы совсем охуели?

    0 желания развиваться. Я смотрю на этот "Шедевр" и вижу как всем было просто банально похуй, потому что за 12 лет игра не переросла потолок движка демонстрируемый скайримом, те же ошибки, те же баги, те же проблемы. Навели марафет с красивой графической составляющей, круто, только в очередной раз с оптимизацией обосрались. Бездари, с большой ебать буквы.    … Expand
  98. pentatonicameno
    Sep 11, 2023
    10
    I have been playing for days, it seems it has no final in order of things to do.
    I'll play it for a long time for sure.
  99. Laissfow
    Sep 11, 2023
    4
    really sad we all expected a good game but we got this loading screen simulator
  100. HeyPruneDog
    Sep 11, 2023
    1
    Even if there weren't loading screens every five seconds, even if there weren't procedurally-generated stretches of barren wasteland, even if it ran at a rock-solid 120fps, it doesn't matter. The writing is boring. The characters are boring. The quests are boring. The powers are boring. The items are boring. The combat is sometimes alright but quickly gets boring. I cannot possibly expressEven if there weren't loading screens every five seconds, even if there weren't procedurally-generated stretches of barren wasteland, even if it ran at a rock-solid 120fps, it doesn't matter. The writing is boring. The characters are boring. The quests are boring. The powers are boring. The items are boring. The combat is sometimes alright but quickly gets boring. I cannot possibly express to you how boring this game is. I tried my best to enjoy it, for several days. Couldn't. Played it via Game Pass, still felt ripped off.… Expand
  101. p0k3m0n
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    Outdated game, outdated engine, outdated dev team, outdated CEO.

    Let me start: I am owner of premium edition so I have been familiar with this production for a few days. First at all I will honestly state that I feel cheated out of $100. And just to be clear, I based my decision to buy not on hype or rumors, but on carefully following official information from the developer, publisher,    Outdated game, outdated engine, outdated dev team, outdated CEO.

    Let me start: I am owner of premium edition so I have been familiar with this production for a few days. First at all I will honestly state that I feel cheated out of $100. And just to be clear, I based my decision to buy not on hype or rumors, but on carefully following official information from the developer, publisher, including their CEOs. So I don't feel like a dumb sucker, but like a person who was deliberately lied to. I want nothing to do with future products with the Microsoft and Bethesda logos. But about that in the summary at the end.

    I begin with technical aspects, because it is easer. In a nutshell: primitive port from consoles. Therefore, VRAM does not exceed 6 GB, and RAM oscillates around 6-8 GB (although on PC 24-32 GB today is not surprising). Hence the constant loading screens, even though the whole thing should sit in memory even though everything works in small instances. And I'm not even mentioning such technical nightmares as the lack of support for proper anti-aliasing in 2023, no DLSS, no Intel ARC GPU support or problems with textures not fully loading, exactly the same as in Forspoken. And that embarrassing performance even on extremely strong configurations with graphics dating back 7 years! How about AI of NPCs and enemies? What AI? What faces animations? What is it? A joke? The whole thing done as off-putting as possible. 3D engine is terrible, I mean terrible outdated and you feel it literally everywhere. Fatal engine, fatal port. And yet, these are only core technical issues, on top of that there is the content, and this content is as if from 2010-2013. It is unacceptable. This way of giving gameplay even comes from the 90's and has nothing to do with current standards. And this applies to the content as well as the form of its delivery, i.e. UI/UX. And it's hard to believe that this is a product released in the year 2023, there are such is the coarseness of everything, feel so cheap, so... lame. Use of Creation Engine while owning the rights to use the id Tech engine. This is lunacy!

    Now we move deeper, and you know what? No alien races, whole Galaxy is open, but there are NOT any other vivid civilizations. The narrative in this game is reminiscent of the work of a 15-year-old for a contest entitled "The story of the world. How I imagine life in 100 years". But, on the other hand, the entire Galaxy we've come to know is purely American: from the architecture, to the disgusting mass culture, to the customs. Where are the cultural differences between the different worlds? Hey, you creators of this carcass without imagination, do you really think that in the future everyone will live in the same cesspool as you today? This is not the 1980s! What is it I ask? WHAT IS IT?! It insults intelligence. Where is the plot? Where do choices matter? It is unbelievable how infantile everything is conveyed and would require an looong and deeep elaboration, but I just don't want to rummage through this rubbish, simply: this is total mess.

    This should be groundbreaking Crysis for the year 2023, not a horribly optimized, archaic product in form and content. This game is in much worse state them Cyberpunk on release because Cyberpunk at least had a good, modern 3D engine and a contemporary gameplay concept.

    This game should never have been released in this state - this is not an indie developer, but the largest software publisher in the world. You can see right through, Microsoft and Bethesda have real problem with internal management, because it is not first blunder this year. Maybe next year something will come of it, if MS does not abandon the project and rebuild this game from the ground up - and I write this completely seriously. For now it is unplayable. This product is a complete mess at this point, it's a beta version, and situations like this gives Microsoft a terrible reputation - again. Something really bad is going on there. Their recent actions resemble management at a market stall, not a multinational corporation. If Microsoft wants to stay in this market as a major player, needs to change something, because the Activision-Blizzard purchase won't help anything if you don't release good products. Of course, in the short term you can count on profits from an uninformed or undemanding customer, but this is a marathon, not a sprint. I am sure, that Starfield discredit will only confirms this.

    And looking at the above I would give a summary rating of 4/10, but in this case I in good conscience give 1/10. Why? Because, let me repeat myself, for months the developer and publisher in their official information simply gave outright lied about whether this product will be. So as owner of premium edition of this game let me summarize: I feel SCAMmed in very bad way which I write utterly honest. Almost everything from the official announcements and official statements turned out to be a lie. Enough is enough.    … Collapse
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

30
#30 Best PC Game of 2023
3
#3 Most Discussed PC Game of 2023

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
85

Generally favorable reviews - based on 75 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 65 out of 75
  2. Mixed: 10 out of 75
  3. Negative: 0 out of 75
  1. Riot Pixels
    Jan 28, 2024
    76
    There's a lot of flaws in space in Starfield. But that does not prevent me from exploring our galaxy again and again.
    Read full review
  2. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Jan 22, 2024
    80
    I fell in love with Starfield. It's my cup of sci-fi and I can't wait to spend the next thirty, fifty, maybe seventy hours here. I enjoy the exploration, the shootouts, the art style, the ship building, and the diverse worlds. I gratefully acknowledge the good optimization and the absence of major bugs. But I can't overlook the flaws. There are bad animations, ugly faces and repetitive moments.[Issue#329]
  3. RPGamer
    Oct 23, 2023
    60
    In a year dominated by sequels to franchise favorites, there was a hope that Starfield would carve its own path to success. While the team at Bethesda should be commended for taking such a big swing, there’s no denying that the game doesn’t feel like a cohesive work. Maybe continued support and future sequels will make something more meaningful out of a work that is clearly deeply enamored with both science fiction and space exploration. Unforunately, this first launch has had far more mixed results than desired.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »