Star Wars Battlefront

 PC
User Score
3.6

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 1708 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 369 out of 1708
  2. Mixed: 224 out of 1708
  3. Negative: 1,115 out of 1708
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Aspromixy
    Aug 8, 2023
    6
    Unfortunately there is no online in 2023, it is safe to say that online is dead in this game, there is nothing more to do without it, missions with bots are boring, I really liked the sounds of weapons, graphics and atmosphere, but after a couple of days I completed all the tasks with bots it was pretty boring, there is no storyline, in fact only the maps change, but everything is theUnfortunately there is no online in 2023, it is safe to say that online is dead in this game, there is nothing more to do without it, missions with bots are boring, I really liked the sounds of weapons, graphics and atmosphere, but after a couple of days I completed all the tasks with bots it was pretty boring, there is no storyline, in fact only the maps change, but everything is the same, control on fighters is poorly implemented, aiming at the target does not work normally… Expand
  2. littlecat_
    Apr 29, 2022
    2
    It s meant for multiplayer . i am not impressed by this . No story at all . Graphics is fine
  3. ProfAmateur
    Dec 28, 2021
    6
    The graphics were amazing, i was blown away.
    But the lack in contant was no good move from DICE. Only a few maps and the rest was DLC.
  4. imarcalija
    Sep 24, 2021
    0
    This game is easily the worst designed game I have ever played. I can't believe this was ever sold for $60. EA, please commit liquidation.
  5. F3T1W
    Aug 27, 2021
    7
    A soulful shooter, with good physics and sounds of shooting, playing as heroes in an online match brought a lot of frenzy
  6. HokageSamaBR
    Feb 6, 2021
    3
    I remember when I played Battlefront on PS2. It was beautiful, cool and I could have fun with everything offline.
    Battlefront 2015 is a beautiful game, but it is not functional.
    It has no campaign, history or anything else. EA Games wanted to take money from players with DLCs, and today they cannot be played offline. Unfortunately the game is full of cheaters, they rule EA. If you want    I remember when I played Battlefront on PS2. It was beautiful, cool and I could have fun with everything offline.
    Battlefront 2015 is a beautiful game, but it is not functional.
    It has no campaign, history or anything else. EA Games wanted to take money from players with DLCs, and today they cannot be played offline.
    Unfortunately the game is full of cheaters, they rule EA. If you want to play, get ready, you will not find good servers and when you find a game, you will not win because of the cheaters.
    Those who bought can no longer use the product.
    I'm just happy that Disney didn't leave the exclusivity of Star Wars to EA anymore.    … Expand
  7. Zajemc
    Dec 14, 2020
    9
    Damn, idk what keeps me playing this game, maybe nostalgia. I cant point you whats good, whats bad but i just enjoy playing it. Either singleplayer and multiplayer which is pretty much dead now.
  8. clanky9
    Nov 9, 2020
    3
    Star wars Battlefront is really boring game made by trash company. I want my 5euro and hours of waiting back!
  9. chumpwithnoname
    Jul 8, 2020
    3
    Very boring game. Good visuals, good sounds, very boring gameplay. Worthless experience, I've played free indie games which are a lot more engaging than this.
  10. DavidFarooq
    Jun 19, 2020
    0
    This game does not even have a bloody single-player campaign! F**K EA! F**K DISNEY!
  11. Darius_84
    May 7, 2020
    0
    By far the worst FPS i've ever played (and I started with Wolfenstein 3D, so: a lot.)
  12. Ruegrong
    Nov 19, 2019
    1
    Game is complete trash and a rip off. Not even worth your time. Nobody plays the season pass, which was $50. The weapons are extremely unbalanced and spawn points are terrible. The enemy team can get behind your spawn and just snipe you. Not to mention the jetpack which allow players on top of the map with unlimited sniper shots. There is a bug since launch where you wont get a partnerGame is complete trash and a rip off. Not even worth your time. Nobody plays the season pass, which was $50. The weapons are extremely unbalanced and spawn points are terrible. The enemy team can get behind your spawn and just snipe you. Not to mention the jetpack which allow players on top of the map with unlimited sniper shots. There is a bug since launch where you wont get a partner even when teams are full. This gives you a huge disadvantage from loss of points and losing a spawn point. The maps are just chokepoint after chokepoint . Hero battles are trash and clumsy. There are not that many modes and people only play walker assault on same 4-6 map rotation. The vehicles are just cards found around the map with no team vehicles nor team communication.Save your time, even if the game is free do not play it, you will just get mad after seeing this game was released for $60… Expand
  13. Genek13
    Nov 15, 2019
    7
    Decent FPS game made for multiplayer. Single player barely exist in this game.
    Visuals and sound are outstanding !! Straight form the movie :)
  14. Averycrosslin
    Nov 2, 2019
    6
    This game is pretty good. It lacks any campaign mode(s) and is very repetitive. Although, I do like the amazing graphics and great action.-packed fun.
  15. strangermoon
    Sep 27, 2019
    8
    everythng smooth here textures look one of best after bf3 and have good amount of weapons. walker assoult mod better than old battlefront even bocuse of new battlefront 2 not have all walkers this looks better mode. supremacy mode close to battlefield. third person game play with fast jet pack action remains one fastest and good. skins better. single player have skirmish mod (split screeneverythng smooth here textures look one of best after bf3 and have good amount of weapons. walker assoult mod better than old battlefront even bocuse of new battlefront 2 not have all walkers this looks better mode. supremacy mode close to battlefield. third person game play with fast jet pack action remains one fastest and good. skins better. single player have skirmish mod (split screen with mod) walkers assoult offline and figter squardon mode. fs mode decent in this game es dlc space maps. have wings mans even legends ships but dont have controlabe bomber class. hard to play wth mouse . keyboard only or controller need to control air vehicles good in dog fight es. maPslike sulust or jakku better than new battlefront 2 and more 1 faced open maps. whats is lack here dlc servers not in normal servers and want to start mosltly 12 player. death star dlc with new mod trench map and scarif sameway remain best. com bf2 now lack of lightsaber heros here issue but have own heros too. aiudo remains best battlefront explosions to other sound effects.… Expand
  16. Kuboch
    Sep 23, 2019
    3
    Game looks nice, but it doesn't have a lot of content. After a while it gets boring. Spaceship wars are only in DLCs. + Now the game is dead, there is only few players.
  17. Mymemesaredank
    Dec 29, 2018
    5
    It has good graphics but that's it.

    Now for more important things, the retards at Polygon made the factually wrong statement of "The best games of 2018 are under ten hours". The best games of 2018 aren't all under 10 or ten hours you factually retarded inbreds. That's fact, Octopath Traveler, Nino Kuni 2, Dragon Quest 11 or xi and Red Dead Redemption 2 are factually among the best games    It has good graphics but that's it.

    Now for more important things, the retards at Polygon made the factually wrong statement of "The best games of 2018 are under ten hours". The best games of 2018 aren't all under 10 or ten hours you factually retarded inbreds. That's fact, Octopath Traveler, Nino Kuni 2, Dragon Quest 11 or xi and Red Dead Redemption 2 are factually among the best games of 2018 and are more than ten hours, the amount of time a game takes doesn't matter and that's fact, the quality does instead and that's fact.

    Somebody who is called Cool Ghosts claims that Dragon's Dogma is "The Best game ever." No retard, it may be a good game but factually it isn't "The Best Game Ever." Not anywhere the best at all.

    Some retard who has a retarded name claimed that "GaaS (Games as a service) is an atrocity", no retard, factually it isn't necessarily an atrocity, it can be a negative if it's DRM for single player games but mulitplayer games have to be sustained. And no, I am not some two dimensional retard who believes it hasn't to be with us or against us pertaining to microtransactions. Some are fine for multiplayer exclusive games and genres, especially if it's free. They are fine to an extent if they're in mobile games. I am not "giving them ground" though retards, I think companies have to learn for themselves what's good and Idk, not be bullied by some retards online. If it's EA then go ahead and dislike them since they have shown numerous times they won't genuinely learn. Mistakes create improvement and that's perfectly fine, no the video game industry and community we have these days is not "seemingly tone deaf" like some retard would have you believe, some are yes but monetization to an extent helps guarantee the games we actually care about and are anticipating don't have monetization. That's why some mobile phone games and MMORPGs for some companies is okay, don't go nuts and it's perfectly fine. If your series is mainly an MMORPG then to an extent it's fine, be positive you don't have anything in an MMORPG that gives players an advantage. Monthly subscription or free to play it's perfectly fine, for mobile games as well. And that goes for multiplayer exclusive genres like Mobas, Hero Shooters, Team Shooters and MMORPGs. No loot boxes though.

    Another thing is the best Nintendo Switch game of the year is Octopath Traveler as well as Smash Bros. Ultimate, it's a tie, that's a fact. Nintendo would survive without Mario and Sony would survive without Naughty Dog/Gran Turismo. That's fact.

    Shadow of the Tomb Raider didn't succeed commercially and had to go on sale but that's perfectly fine mainly because there wasn't anything that would make it apparent it wasn't going to succeed. it's a mistake but that's fine.

    Now lastly to talk about Square Enix. They are factually a good company. An example of "Creator Worship" even. They are factually generally well liked by the public and their fans, that's a fact. They acknowledge their fans in the East and West but now consider the kind of games they make even more because of the overwhelmingly positive fan feedback of Bravely Default. Some braindead retards on the cancerous retarded pedophile website "TV Tropes" though would lie to you on their retarded "Darth Wiki"(A name by retards for retards) and claim it's a "Fallen Creator" example or some similar retardation, despite having it as an example of "Creator Worship" as well even though it's one or the other. They are factually retarded and the retarded braindead "Fallen Creator" example is factually wrong as well. It's factually not a "Fallen Creator" it's factually an example of "Creator Worship". FFXIV wasn't great at first? Turned around the project and made it a good game and Square Enix was thoroughly commended by players, critics and fans alike for their effort, thus making them more "Creator worshipped" then before since it is now well liked. FF The Spirits Within? That movie that almost shut down Square? ALMOST. They recovered and are now more successful then ever after merging with Enix and now have more creative capability thanks to that. That's a positive, a "Fallen Creator" wouldn't have survived that, they would've shut down and not recovered because of that mistake, but they gained more from it instead. That's a fact. A vocal minority of some retards online may or may not site them as one of the first stereotypes of JRPGs and make retarded videos about selling merchandise, that's retarded "evidence" that isn't actually evidence. What if they are seen by some retards who are undoubtedly the kind of retarded ignorant American cumsuckers(Some Americans are good, not them though) who make equally retarded and factually wrong statements, over generalizations and stereotypes about anime and manga as one of the first "stereotypes" of JRPGs? What stereotype? That JRPGs are good games? Since they are, but you retards neglected to specify that of course. There will be part 2.    … Expand
  18. Lolzepicgamez
    Dec 23, 2018
    5
    A passable game, what's good about it is the graphics.

    Now there is something important to talk about. Some retard at TV Tropes named ACW made the retarded statement of "which is not even close to the third game." in a discussion about Kingdom Hearts 3, yes it is the third game you retard, the third MAIN game. Secondly there is no "sequel number snarl" since nobody is confused about the    A passable game, what's good about it is the graphics.

    Now there is something important to talk about. Some retard at TV Tropes named ACW made the retarded statement of "which is not even close to the third game." in a discussion about Kingdom Hearts 3, yes it is the third game you retard, the third MAIN game. Secondly there is no "sequel number snarl" since nobody is confused about the naming of games like Kingdom Hearts, that's a retarded belief that doesn't exist. It's not even more of a mess, it's also not really, "really" complicated and that's fact since everybody who has waited for it for five years have played all the games and nothing is "fouled" by naming since it's a fact that "sequel naming snarl" doesn't exist retard. Another thing is that Kingdom Hearts is an arpg, not really a "hack and slash" like some retarded hack fraud youtube "critics" would claim, that's fact since it has everything an arpg does, but no it's unconventional and we can't compare it to anything else so let's lie and claim it's a "hack and slash". If you think it's "more like a hack and slash" you are factually wrong and retarded since it is an arpg. Literally play the game, and it's not a matter of "fanboys" retards, it's a fact you idiots don't actually understand anything about the game itself but act like you do. Another thing is the blowjobbing retarded idiot named "Rabbidluigi" claiming Kingdom Hearts 358/2 days is a "good game with a bad story", no you retard it's a good game with a good story, virtually nobody complains about the gameplay since it's a fact that nobody has an issue with it. Therefore it's a fact that it's not in the "Top 5 Bad Games With Good Stories" it's in the "Top 5 Good Games With Good Stories" and that's fact as well. Another retarded brainlet is some cumchugger retard named ThrillingDuck who made the retarded clickbait claim at about 2014 or something of "The decline of Kingdom Hearts" when it a fact that "The decline of Kingdom Hearts" doesn't exist and that's fact, there hasn't been any "decline" of Kingdom Hearts you braindead retard and that's fact as well. There isn't any decline of Kingdom Hearts and won't ever be any decline of Kingdom Hearts and that's the fact of the matter. The games haven't been as frequent to ensure all development is on making Kingdom Hearts as good as possible, that's a fact. The retard attempted a stupid idiot immature retard rant but he blew throbbing shaft at it like the retard he is. The story has always been complicated to start so that's not a valid complaint either, especially since the story actually works and that's a fact as well. Lastly somebody said for the opening "Dream Drop Distance is the best and Re:Chain of Memories is the worse in my opinion". It's fine to have an opinion but factually they are all good, Chain of Memories isn't as good as Dream Drop Distance but factually Dream Drop Distance isn't necessarily the best. Somebody named Baneewii said "I agree". Nobody does agree on that necessarily, therefore it's not "I agree", that's fact. Lastly the first guy said "Um, thank you for respecting my opinion?" Okay, your opinion can be respected, it's not necessarily accurate though since Re:Chain of Memories is not "worse" it not as good is all. Everything I have said in the review here up to now in response is fact, disagree and you are wrong and retarded. That's fact, I am honest about retards.

    On another topic, it's more political and about Bowsette but who cares. Some shaftchugging woketarded braindead journalist named Don Nero who probably burned innocent people alive, made a retarted SJW statement of claiming and had unsuccessfully described Bowsette as "dominatrix-inspired" and attempting and failing proposing her as a "positive symbol of female empowerment". How about a character made to be good retard? Lara and Samus were good because of characterization, Bowsette exists for porn, that's it, done, finished and though the retard complained that a bulk of the art was "overtly male-gazey." and btw, "male-gazey" is not a phrase cumchugging queer, secondly it could be "female-gazey", oh but wait, then you would have to not be a woketarded emasculated little cuck baby and actually have balls and not be a hypocrite retard wouldn't you little SJW cucklet? Then the beta cucklet who has retarded castrated male guilt for some retarded idiot reason said "dripping with horrendously over-the-top, seam bursting cliches that call to mind the bodacious sex-dolls of Dead or Alive Volleyball" Oh poor little castrated cucktard, Bowsette's not "woke" enough for you? Piss off you cancerous piece of fecal matter. It's not "dripping" with anything and they aren't "horrendously over-the-top" either cuckbreath. Afraid of their sexuality since your attracted to some porn and projecting by lying, undoubtedly the retardation of an SJW. And they aren't "seam bursting cliches". Everything I have said in response here is fact. There will be part 2.    … Expand
  19. Ezio_Traditore
    Dec 2, 2018
    0
    its really boring after 20 hours there is no story mode. it's only multiplayer but you know what? there is not that much map and game mode in a "multiplayer only" game. congrats ea.
  20. Androxus
    Nov 22, 2018
    10
    Tausend mal besser als der zweite Teil.Besser als alle Battlefield Teile nur Battlefield 5 macht ihm Konkurenz.Super Muliplayer nur der Einzelspieler Modus lässt zu wünschen übrig.Sehr zu empfehlen.
  21. LetMePickThat
    Aug 7, 2018
    3
    Stunning graphics, empty shooter, boring gameplay.
    Either that game was rushed or someone needs to be fired. I'm astonished by how empty Battlefront is. I bought it hoping for a successor to the original Battlefront serie, needless to say I was disappointed.
  22. Diegochocho
    Jul 5, 2018
    4
    Aburrido, muy repetitivo, y no puede ser que un juego de Star Wars no tenga historia.
  23. AntsInMyEyes
    Jun 18, 2018
    1
    The game runs great and is generally a really fun game despite it's surprising lack of game modes, maps, character customization and uniqueness. However, the game has died and no longer has the player base to actually join a 40 man match.
  24. Evae
    Mar 3, 2018
    5
    EA's newest release can be summed up into one game. Battlefield 4: Star Wars edition.

    As a Star Wars fan, I can say that this game fits the bill as an accurate representation of the Star Wars world. Great sound. Outstanding graphics. Both things that anyone can enjoy. Despite this, Star Wars Battlefront lacks the actually "Game" factor of being a video game. The lack of game modes and    EA's newest release can be summed up into one game. Battlefield 4: Star Wars edition.

    As a Star Wars fan, I can say that this game fits the bill as an accurate representation of the Star Wars world. Great sound. Outstanding graphics. Both things that anyone can enjoy. Despite this, Star Wars Battlefront lacks the actually "Game" factor of being a video game. The lack of game modes and customization make Battlefront a game that you can pick up, waste some time with, and then put back down without ever playing it again.

    In all honesty, I feel restrained, as if I'm being stuck inside a house, looking at a beautiful beach on the coast, but cannot go outside. This is the best way I can explain battlefront. Just a large, beautiful looking game with a massive amount of lost potential.    … Expand
  25. redacted
    Jan 27, 2018
    1
    Need to keep on striking EA hard and telling them I will never buy their games with micro-transactions again.

    Especially any Star Wars games and EA is going to be adding back the micro-transactions in Star Wars Battlefront 2 in March. I'm also ashamed that I bought this Star Wars game back in 2015 when it came out and I last played it in June of last year, also it's missing a    Need to keep on striking EA hard and telling them I will never buy their games with micro-transactions again.

    Especially any Star Wars games and EA is going to be adding back the micro-transactions in Star Wars Battlefront 2 in March.

    I'm also ashamed that I bought this Star Wars game back in 2015 when it came out and I last played it in June of last year, also it's missing a single-player campaign giving us at least 10 hours worth. I wish EA/DICE would go back to this Star Wars and give it a single-player campaign.

    Until then never buying EA games again.    … Expand
  26. deathbringer
    Dec 4, 2017
    0
    Disgusting piece of **** pay2win game. Lootboxes everywhere. Seriously if this is where the gaming industry is heading then i want no part in it anymore. It appears that only Indie developers are creating games without pay2win microtransactions. Now the big game companies are even implementing microtransactions in buy-to-play and singleplayer games...
  27. mournfulness
    Nov 23, 2017
    0
    A good graphics but gameplay is very very boring and lamer. Good Star Wars design but not adaptable with a good gameplay. It looks like this game is dedicated to children.
  28. OzBountyHunter
    Oct 13, 2017
    2
    Nice Graphics, nice sound, and lot of hackers in pc version, recycled maps and missing campaign.
    I feel scammed, and so dissapointed, thanks to EA and DICE i'll never buy an pre-order game
  29. kiwijinxter
    Apr 8, 2017
    4
    OK the premise looked fantastic. Who wouldn't want to be "in" the movies with a game like this. Unfortunately, this game doesn't have the story the movies tell, so you're left with the gameplay. Unfortunately, the gameplay is weak and does get boring fast. After a couple of tutorials - many which are very boring - you very quickly realise the weakness of this game. While I find the FPSOK the premise looked fantastic. Who wouldn't want to be "in" the movies with a game like this. Unfortunately, this game doesn't have the story the movies tell, so you're left with the gameplay. Unfortunately, the gameplay is weak and does get boring fast. After a couple of tutorials - many which are very boring - you very quickly realise the weakness of this game. While I find the FPS bits OK, the vehicle handling is terrible - scooters, X-wings, etc. handle in a very imprecise way, leaving very much to be desired. I played it for over an hour and already found myself quite bored. I think it's tried to be everything to everyone and end up being not very good at everything. Overall, I think there's not enough "weight" to either the story or the gameplay. It's OK and relatively fun in small doses, but didn't hold my attention long, and made me long for more "weighty" FPS such as Far Cry 3 or 4. And of course, single player is probably not the best reason to buy this game anyway.… Expand
  30. foolycooly3900
    Mar 29, 2017
    1
    The only thing this game has going for it is the graphics.

    Looks stunning and plays smoothly, but it kind of makes me feel like I'm playing the FPS version of a GTA game that only has two roads.
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

9
#9 Most Discussed PC Game of 2015
18
#18 Most Shared PC Game of 2015

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
72

Mixed or average reviews - based on 19 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 8 out of 19
  2. Mixed: 11 out of 19
  3. Negative: 0 out of 19
  1. CD-Action
    Feb 4, 2016
    75
    A perfect game for short sessions. It’s not deep enough to convince online shooters veterans, but it will definitely win over Star Wars fans. [01/2016, p.34]
  2. Pelit (Finland)
    Jan 4, 2016
    81
    Star Wars Battlefront looks and sounds great, and with Battlefield-class gameplay could have ruled the multiplayer galaxy. Unfortunately, at best OK-level, Battlefront-class gameplay is much too shallow to last long. And this is THE one license, which really needs a single player campaign. [Dec 2015]
  3. Edge Magazine
    Jan 3, 2016
    70
    Any semblance of subtlety is abandoned entirely when it comes to the playable Hero and Villain characters. [Jan 2016, p.110]
See all critic reviews »