User Score
3.6

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 1708 Ratings

User score distribution:
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Aug 8, 2023
    6
    Unfortunately there is no online in 2023, it is safe to say that online is dead in this game, there is nothing more to do without it, missions with bots are boring, I really liked the sounds of weapons, graphics and atmosphere, but after a couple of days I completed all the tasks with bots it was pretty boring, there is no storyline, in fact only the maps change, but everything is theUnfortunately there is no online in 2023, it is safe to say that online is dead in this game, there is nothing more to do without it, missions with bots are boring, I really liked the sounds of weapons, graphics and atmosphere, but after a couple of days I completed all the tasks with bots it was pretty boring, there is no storyline, in fact only the maps change, but everything is the same, control on fighters is poorly implemented, aiming at the target does not work normally Expand
  2. Apr 29, 2022
    2
    It s meant for multiplayer . i am not impressed by this . No story at all . Graphics is fine
  3. Dec 28, 2021
    6
    The graphics were amazing, i was blown away.
    But the lack in contant was no good move from DICE. Only a few maps and the rest was DLC.
  4. Sep 24, 2021
    0
    This game is easily the worst designed game I have ever played. I can't believe this was ever sold for $60. EA, please commit liquidation.
  5. Aug 27, 2021
    7
    A soulful shooter, with good physics and sounds of shooting, playing as heroes in an online match brought a lot of frenzy
  6. Feb 6, 2021
    3
    I remember when I played Battlefront on PS2. It was beautiful, cool and I could have fun with everything offline.
    Battlefront 2015 is a beautiful game, but it is not functional.
    It has no campaign, history or anything else. EA Games wanted to take money from players with DLCs, and today they cannot be played offline. Unfortunately the game is full of cheaters, they rule EA. If you want
    I remember when I played Battlefront on PS2. It was beautiful, cool and I could have fun with everything offline.
    Battlefront 2015 is a beautiful game, but it is not functional.
    It has no campaign, history or anything else. EA Games wanted to take money from players with DLCs, and today they cannot be played offline.
    Unfortunately the game is full of cheaters, they rule EA. If you want to play, get ready, you will not find good servers and when you find a game, you will not win because of the cheaters.
    Those who bought can no longer use the product.
    I'm just happy that Disney didn't leave the exclusivity of Star Wars to EA anymore.
    Expand
  7. Dec 14, 2020
    9
    Damn, idk what keeps me playing this game, maybe nostalgia. I cant point you whats good, whats bad but i just enjoy playing it. Either singleplayer and multiplayer which is pretty much dead now.
  8. Nov 9, 2020
    3
    Star wars Battlefront is really boring game made by trash company. I want my 5euro and hours of waiting back!
  9. Jul 8, 2020
    3
    Very boring game. Good visuals, good sounds, very boring gameplay. Worthless experience, I've played free indie games which are a lot more engaging than this.
  10. Jun 19, 2020
    0
    This game does not even have a bloody single-player campaign! F**K EA! F**K DISNEY!
  11. May 7, 2020
    0
    By far the worst FPS i've ever played (and I started with Wolfenstein 3D, so: a lot.)
  12. Nov 19, 2019
    1
    Game is complete trash and a rip off. Not even worth your time. Nobody plays the season pass, which was $50. The weapons are extremely unbalanced and spawn points are terrible. The enemy team can get behind your spawn and just snipe you. Not to mention the jetpack which allow players on top of the map with unlimited sniper shots. There is a bug since launch where you wont get a partnerGame is complete trash and a rip off. Not even worth your time. Nobody plays the season pass, which was $50. The weapons are extremely unbalanced and spawn points are terrible. The enemy team can get behind your spawn and just snipe you. Not to mention the jetpack which allow players on top of the map with unlimited sniper shots. There is a bug since launch where you wont get a partner even when teams are full. This gives you a huge disadvantage from loss of points and losing a spawn point. The maps are just chokepoint after chokepoint . Hero battles are trash and clumsy. There are not that many modes and people only play walker assault on same 4-6 map rotation. The vehicles are just cards found around the map with no team vehicles nor team communication.Save your time, even if the game is free do not play it, you will just get mad after seeing this game was released for $60 Expand
  13. Nov 15, 2019
    7
    Decent FPS game made for multiplayer. Single player barely exist in this game.
    Visuals and sound are outstanding !! Straight form the movie :)
  14. Nov 2, 2019
    6
    This game is pretty good. It lacks any campaign mode(s) and is very repetitive. Although, I do like the amazing graphics and great action.-packed fun.
  15. Sep 27, 2019
    8
    everythng smooth here textures look one of best after bf3 and have good amount of weapons. walker assoult mod better than old battlefront even bocuse of new battlefront 2 not have all walkers this looks better mode. supremacy mode close to battlefield. third person game play with fast jet pack action remains one fastest and good. skins better. single player have skirmish mod (split screeneverythng smooth here textures look one of best after bf3 and have good amount of weapons. walker assoult mod better than old battlefront even bocuse of new battlefront 2 not have all walkers this looks better mode. supremacy mode close to battlefield. third person game play with fast jet pack action remains one fastest and good. skins better. single player have skirmish mod (split screen with mod) walkers assoult offline and figter squardon mode. fs mode decent in this game es dlc space maps. have wings mans even legends ships but dont have controlabe bomber class. hard to play wth mouse . keyboard only or controller need to control air vehicles good in dog fight es. maPslike sulust or jakku better than new battlefront 2 and more 1 faced open maps. whats is lack here dlc servers not in normal servers and want to start mosltly 12 player. death star dlc with new mod trench map and scarif sameway remain best. com bf2 now lack of lightsaber heros here issue but have own heros too. aiudo remains best battlefront explosions to other sound effects. Expand
  16. Sep 23, 2019
    3
    Game looks nice, but it doesn't have a lot of content. After a while it gets boring. Spaceship wars are only in DLCs. + Now the game is dead, there is only few players.
  17. Dec 29, 2018
    5
    It has good graphics but that's it.

    Now for more important things, the retards at Polygon made the factually wrong statement of "The best games of 2018 are under ten hours". The best games of 2018 aren't all under 10 or ten hours you factually retarded inbreds. That's fact, Octopath Traveler, Nino Kuni 2, Dragon Quest 11 or xi and Red Dead Redemption 2 are factually among the best games
    It has good graphics but that's it.

    Now for more important things, the retards at Polygon made the factually wrong statement of "The best games of 2018 are under ten hours". The best games of 2018 aren't all under 10 or ten hours you factually retarded inbreds. That's fact, Octopath Traveler, Nino Kuni 2, Dragon Quest 11 or xi and Red Dead Redemption 2 are factually among the best games of 2018 and are more than ten hours, the amount of time a game takes doesn't matter and that's fact, the quality does instead and that's fact.

    Somebody who is called Cool Ghosts claims that Dragon's Dogma is "The Best game ever." No retard, it may be a good game but factually it isn't "The Best Game Ever." Not anywhere the best at all.

    Some retard who has a retarded name claimed that "GaaS (Games as a service) is an atrocity", no retard, factually it isn't necessarily an atrocity, it can be a negative if it's DRM for single player games but mulitplayer games have to be sustained. And no, I am not some two dimensional retard who believes it hasn't to be with us or against us pertaining to microtransactions. Some are fine for multiplayer exclusive games and genres, especially if it's free. They are fine to an extent if they're in mobile games. I am not "giving them ground" though retards, I think companies have to learn for themselves what's good and Idk, not be bullied by some retards online. If it's EA then go ahead and dislike them since they have shown numerous times they won't genuinely learn. Mistakes create improvement and that's perfectly fine, no the video game industry and community we have these days is not "seemingly tone deaf" like some retard would have you believe, some are yes but monetization to an extent helps guarantee the games we actually care about and are anticipating don't have monetization. That's why some mobile phone games and MMORPGs for some companies is okay, don't go nuts and it's perfectly fine. If your series is mainly an MMORPG then to an extent it's fine, be positive you don't have anything in an MMORPG that gives players an advantage. Monthly subscription or free to play it's perfectly fine, for mobile games as well. And that goes for multiplayer exclusive genres like Mobas, Hero Shooters, Team Shooters and MMORPGs. No loot boxes though.

    Another thing is the best Nintendo Switch game of the year is Octopath Traveler as well as Smash Bros. Ultimate, it's a tie, that's a fact. Nintendo would survive without Mario and Sony would survive without Naughty Dog/Gran Turismo. That's fact.

    Shadow of the Tomb Raider didn't succeed commercially and had to go on sale but that's perfectly fine mainly because there wasn't anything that would make it apparent it wasn't going to succeed. it's a mistake but that's fine.

    Now lastly to talk about Square Enix. They are factually a good company. An example of "Creator Worship" even. They are factually generally well liked by the public and their fans, that's a fact. They acknowledge their fans in the East and West but now consider the kind of games they make even more because of the overwhelmingly positive fan feedback of Bravely Default. Some braindead retards on the cancerous retarded pedophile website "TV Tropes" though would lie to you on their retarded "Darth Wiki"(A name by retards for retards) and claim it's a "Fallen Creator" example or some similar retardation, despite having it as an example of "Creator Worship" as well even though it's one or the other. They are factually retarded and the retarded braindead "Fallen Creator" example is factually wrong as well. It's factually not a "Fallen Creator" it's factually an example of "Creator Worship". FFXIV wasn't great at first? Turned around the project and made it a good game and Square Enix was thoroughly commended by players, critics and fans alike for their effort, thus making them more "Creator worshipped" then before since it is now well liked. FF The Spirits Within? That movie that almost shut down Square? ALMOST. They recovered and are now more successful then ever after merging with Enix and now have more creative capability thanks to that. That's a positive, a "Fallen Creator" wouldn't have survived that, they would've shut down and not recovered because of that mistake, but they gained more from it instead. That's a fact. A vocal minority of some retards online may or may not site them as one of the first stereotypes of JRPGs and make retarded videos about selling merchandise, that's retarded "evidence" that isn't actually evidence. What if they are seen by some retards who are undoubtedly the kind of retarded ignorant American cumsuckers(Some Americans are good, not them though) who make equally retarded and factually wrong statements, over generalizations and stereotypes about anime and manga as one of the first "stereotypes" of JRPGs? What stereotype? That JRPGs are good games? Since they are, but you retards neglected to specify that of course. There will be part 2.
    Expand
  18. Dec 23, 2018
    5
    A passable game, what's good about it is the graphics.

    Now there is something important to talk about. Some retard at TV Tropes named ACW made the retarded statement of "which is not even close to the third game." in a discussion about Kingdom Hearts 3, yes it is the third game you retard, the third MAIN game. Secondly there is no "sequel number snarl" since nobody is confused about the
    A passable game, what's good about it is the graphics.

    Now there is something important to talk about. Some retard at TV Tropes named ACW made the retarded statement of "which is not even close to the third game." in a discussion about Kingdom Hearts 3, yes it is the third game you retard, the third MAIN game. Secondly there is no "sequel number snarl" since nobody is confused about the naming of games like Kingdom Hearts, that's a retarded belief that doesn't exist. It's not even more of a mess, it's also not really, "really" complicated and that's fact since everybody who has waited for it for five years have played all the games and nothing is "fouled" by naming since it's a fact that "sequel naming snarl" doesn't exist retard. Another thing is that Kingdom Hearts is an arpg, not really a "hack and slash" like some retarded hack fraud youtube "critics" would claim, that's fact since it has everything an arpg does, but no it's unconventional and we can't compare it to anything else so let's lie and claim it's a "hack and slash". If you think it's "more like a hack and slash" you are factually wrong and retarded since it is an arpg. Literally play the game, and it's not a matter of "fanboys" retards, it's a fact you idiots don't actually understand anything about the game itself but act like you do. Another thing is the blowjobbing retarded idiot named "Rabbidluigi" claiming Kingdom Hearts 358/2 days is a "good game with a bad story", no you retard it's a good game with a good story, virtually nobody complains about the gameplay since it's a fact that nobody has an issue with it. Therefore it's a fact that it's not in the "Top 5 Bad Games With Good Stories" it's in the "Top 5 Good Games With Good Stories" and that's fact as well. Another retarded brainlet is some cumchugger retard named ThrillingDuck who made the retarded clickbait claim at about 2014 or something of "The decline of Kingdom Hearts" when it a fact that "The decline of Kingdom Hearts" doesn't exist and that's fact, there hasn't been any "decline" of Kingdom Hearts you braindead retard and that's fact as well. There isn't any decline of Kingdom Hearts and won't ever be any decline of Kingdom Hearts and that's the fact of the matter. The games haven't been as frequent to ensure all development is on making Kingdom Hearts as good as possible, that's a fact. The retard attempted a stupid idiot immature retard rant but he blew throbbing shaft at it like the retard he is. The story has always been complicated to start so that's not a valid complaint either, especially since the story actually works and that's a fact as well. Lastly somebody said for the opening "Dream Drop Distance is the best and Re:Chain of Memories is the worse in my opinion". It's fine to have an opinion but factually they are all good, Chain of Memories isn't as good as Dream Drop Distance but factually Dream Drop Distance isn't necessarily the best. Somebody named Baneewii said "I agree". Nobody does agree on that necessarily, therefore it's not "I agree", that's fact. Lastly the first guy said "Um, thank you for respecting my opinion?" Okay, your opinion can be respected, it's not necessarily accurate though since Re:Chain of Memories is not "worse" it not as good is all. Everything I have said in the review here up to now in response is fact, disagree and you are wrong and retarded. That's fact, I am honest about retards.

    On another topic, it's more political and about Bowsette but who cares. Some shaftchugging woketarded braindead journalist named Don Nero who probably burned innocent people alive, made a retarted SJW statement of claiming and had unsuccessfully described Bowsette as "dominatrix-inspired" and attempting and failing proposing her as a "positive symbol of female empowerment". How about a character made to be good retard? Lara and Samus were good because of characterization, Bowsette exists for porn, that's it, done, finished and though the retard complained that a bulk of the art was "overtly male-gazey." and btw, "male-gazey" is not a phrase cumchugging queer, secondly it could be "female-gazey", oh but wait, then you would have to not be a woketarded emasculated little cuck baby and actually have balls and not be a hypocrite retard wouldn't you little SJW cucklet? Then the beta cucklet who has retarded castrated male guilt for some retarded idiot reason said "dripping with horrendously over-the-top, seam bursting cliches that call to mind the bodacious sex-dolls of Dead or Alive Volleyball" Oh poor little castrated cucktard, Bowsette's not "woke" enough for you? Piss off you cancerous piece of fecal matter. It's not "dripping" with anything and they aren't "horrendously over-the-top" either cuckbreath. Afraid of their sexuality since your attracted to some porn and projecting by lying, undoubtedly the retardation of an SJW. And they aren't "seam bursting cliches". Everything I have said in response here is fact. There will be part 2.
    Expand
  19. Dec 2, 2018
    0
    its really boring after 20 hours there is no story mode. it's only multiplayer but you know what? there is not that much map and game mode in a "multiplayer only" game. congrats ea.
  20. Nov 22, 2018
    10
    Tausend mal besser als der zweite Teil.Besser als alle Battlefield Teile nur Battlefield 5 macht ihm Konkurenz.Super Muliplayer nur der Einzelspieler Modus lässt zu wünschen übrig.Sehr zu empfehlen.
  21. Aug 7, 2018
    3
    Stunning graphics, empty shooter, boring gameplay.
    Either that game was rushed or someone needs to be fired. I'm astonished by how empty Battlefront is. I bought it hoping for a successor to the original Battlefront serie, needless to say I was disappointed.
  22. Jul 5, 2018
    4
    Aburrido, muy repetitivo, y no puede ser que un juego de Star Wars no tenga historia.
  23. Jun 18, 2018
    1
    The game runs great and is generally a really fun game despite it's surprising lack of game modes, maps, character customization and uniqueness. However, the game has died and no longer has the player base to actually join a 40 man match.
  24. Mar 3, 2018
    5
    EA's newest release can be summed up into one game. Battlefield 4: Star Wars edition.

    As a Star Wars fan, I can say that this game fits the bill as an accurate representation of the Star Wars world. Great sound. Outstanding graphics. Both things that anyone can enjoy. Despite this, Star Wars Battlefront lacks the actually "Game" factor of being a video game. The lack of game modes and
    EA's newest release can be summed up into one game. Battlefield 4: Star Wars edition.

    As a Star Wars fan, I can say that this game fits the bill as an accurate representation of the Star Wars world. Great sound. Outstanding graphics. Both things that anyone can enjoy. Despite this, Star Wars Battlefront lacks the actually "Game" factor of being a video game. The lack of game modes and customization make Battlefront a game that you can pick up, waste some time with, and then put back down without ever playing it again.

    In all honesty, I feel restrained, as if I'm being stuck inside a house, looking at a beautiful beach on the coast, but cannot go outside. This is the best way I can explain battlefront. Just a large, beautiful looking game with a massive amount of lost potential.
    Expand
  25. Jan 27, 2018
    1
    Need to keep on striking EA hard and telling them I will never buy their games with micro-transactions again.

    Especially any Star Wars games and EA is going to be adding back the micro-transactions in Star Wars Battlefront 2 in March. I'm also ashamed that I bought this Star Wars game back in 2015 when it came out and I last played it in June of last year, also it's missing a
    Need to keep on striking EA hard and telling them I will never buy their games with micro-transactions again.

    Especially any Star Wars games and EA is going to be adding back the micro-transactions in Star Wars Battlefront 2 in March.

    I'm also ashamed that I bought this Star Wars game back in 2015 when it came out and I last played it in June of last year, also it's missing a single-player campaign giving us at least 10 hours worth. I wish EA/DICE would go back to this Star Wars and give it a single-player campaign.

    Until then never buying EA games again.
    Expand
  26. Dec 4, 2017
    0
    Disgusting piece of **** pay2win game. Lootboxes everywhere. Seriously if this is where the gaming industry is heading then i want no part in it anymore. It appears that only Indie developers are creating games without pay2win microtransactions. Now the big game companies are even implementing microtransactions in buy-to-play and singleplayer games...
  27. Nov 23, 2017
    0
    A good graphics but gameplay is very very boring and lamer. Good Star Wars design but not adaptable with a good gameplay. It looks like this game is dedicated to children.
  28. Oct 13, 2017
    2
    Nice Graphics, nice sound, and lot of hackers in pc version, recycled maps and missing campaign.
    I feel scammed, and so dissapointed, thanks to EA and DICE i'll never buy an pre-order game
  29. Apr 8, 2017
    4
    OK the premise looked fantastic. Who wouldn't want to be "in" the movies with a game like this. Unfortunately, this game doesn't have the story the movies tell, so you're left with the gameplay. Unfortunately, the gameplay is weak and does get boring fast. After a couple of tutorials - many which are very boring - you very quickly realise the weakness of this game. While I find the FPSOK the premise looked fantastic. Who wouldn't want to be "in" the movies with a game like this. Unfortunately, this game doesn't have the story the movies tell, so you're left with the gameplay. Unfortunately, the gameplay is weak and does get boring fast. After a couple of tutorials - many which are very boring - you very quickly realise the weakness of this game. While I find the FPS bits OK, the vehicle handling is terrible - scooters, X-wings, etc. handle in a very imprecise way, leaving very much to be desired. I played it for over an hour and already found myself quite bored. I think it's tried to be everything to everyone and end up being not very good at everything. Overall, I think there's not enough "weight" to either the story or the gameplay. It's OK and relatively fun in small doses, but didn't hold my attention long, and made me long for more "weighty" FPS such as Far Cry 3 or 4. And of course, single player is probably not the best reason to buy this game anyway. Expand
  30. Mar 29, 2017
    1
    The only thing this game has going for it is the graphics.

    Looks stunning and plays smoothly, but it kind of makes me feel like I'm playing the FPS version of a GTA game that only has two roads.
  31. Mar 26, 2017
    0
    pros: Star Wars setting, graphics, sound
    cons: lack of content, very bad game design, broken core game mechanics (worst team balancing ever), casual gameplay, pc platform full of hackers
  32. Mar 24, 2017
    4
    This game is mainly for fans of star wars, they just appreciate it.
    The planets look realistic, and insanely beautiful, music is amazing. you feel like in the movie!
    But the atmosphere is the only good. laser guns shoot very strange and you can't kill more than two, and even one kill is hard. You'll die often even if you are good at playing shooters. I games mode, heroes vs villains.
    This game is mainly for fans of star wars, they just appreciate it.
    The planets look realistic, and insanely beautiful, music is amazing. you feel like in the movie!
    But the atmosphere is the only good. laser guns shoot very strange and you can't kill more than two, and even one kill is hard. You'll die often even if you are good at playing shooters.
    I games mode, heroes vs villains. This mode is fun! I love to play for Darth Vader, he's insanely cool and dangerous, I feel all-powerful Sith. The basic modes I did not like, I was not nice to play them. Moreover, here again all the pumping, and to get to the good weapons need a lot of time.
    Company is not! This is the main disadvantage. In the game star wars needs to be company. But we have only training. And there are videos that are short but beautiful. I would like a company with the same beautiful rollers, but it is not. There are only boring multiplayer.
    The game looks beautiful, but empty (like my ex bf).
    Expand
  33. Mar 9, 2017
    0
    This is a great game if you want to feel like being in a Star Wars movie (only one of the original movies because apparently everyone's in denial). It looks amazing, sound is amazing....and that's it.
    If you're looking for a game, this isn't it. Gets boring after a few min. I bought this on sale and I still can't see the value in paying $10 for this game apart from the Star Wars royalties.
  34. Feb 20, 2017
    5
    I've played the game countless times and over 400 hours, it is indeed incredibly beautiful and thematic and I love that, but hell there are 3 things you should know before considering to buy it or its sequel:

    1) very weak cheating control, 1-2 guys often ruin a game of 40; 2) EA servers only, and this is bad, like profit maximization bad. If they decide to stop to support the game
    I've played the game countless times and over 400 hours, it is indeed incredibly beautiful and thematic and I love that, but hell there are 3 things you should know before considering to buy it or its sequel:

    1) very weak cheating control, 1-2 guys often ruin a game of 40;

    2) EA servers only, and this is bad, like profit maximization bad. If they decide to stop to support the game one day, I have the feeling this is it - game over. Such games do not deserve to be bought only because of this.

    3) Non existent server browser. The multiplayer server mechanics forces you once in a server to play the maps always in the same order, 2 games per map, one after the other. I wish I was able to search for a server that plays one map only.
    Expand
  35. Jan 13, 2017
    10
    10/10 all
    Haters gonna hate!
    I dont know how someone can give 1 or 0 to this amazing game.
    Everything is perfect.
    Only thing needed is a fix for Lando glitch.
    Lots of noobs abuse it!
  36. Jan 11, 2017
    1
    It gets a one because its absolutely gorgeous and the audio is spot on. It loses the other nine because the game sucks.

    Within an hour its repetitive and boring. Anyone remember that old Star Trek Voyager FPS game that ran on the Unreal engine? Yea, it feels like that. This isn't an AAA title, and it's definitely not worth the insane price EA is asking for it. My advice? Play
    It gets a one because its absolutely gorgeous and the audio is spot on. It loses the other nine because the game sucks.

    Within an hour its repetitive and boring. Anyone remember that old Star Trek Voyager FPS game that ran on the Unreal engine? Yea, it feels like that. This isn't an AAA title, and it's definitely not worth the insane price EA is asking for it.

    My advice? Play the four hour free-trial and forget about it.

    DICE: I knew that EA was going to destroy you. The way they destroyed Westwood and countless others. Sorry to see you go.

    BF2 and 2142 shall live forever in my heart. Good Luck
    Expand
  37. Dec 30, 2016
    2
    I have never seen as laggy internet gaming experience as this one in past 10 years. Since broadband widely spread across our homes, we almost forgot about internet lags. Star Wars Battlefront will remind you what dial-up internet felt like.
  38. Dec 26, 2016
    1
    I bought it for 6 buck on the christmass sale. The game looks amazing and sounds amazing but it is as deep as a pond of water. You'll be playing the same game mode over and over again on a few maps that looks great but underneat are all the same. You will be unlocking weapons that all feel like a skin of a the same weapon (they are all basically the same). There are no classes, becauseI bought it for 6 buck on the christmass sale. The game looks amazing and sounds amazing but it is as deep as a pond of water. You'll be playing the same game mode over and over again on a few maps that looks great but underneat are all the same. You will be unlocking weapons that all feel like a skin of a the same weapon (they are all basically the same). There are no classes, because you auto heal, you have unlimited ammo and the specialized weapons are power ups in the map.

    I paid 6 bucks and i feel ripped off. Stay away of this crap. It's a -pretty- crap but it's still crap.
    Expand
  39. Dec 21, 2016
    0
    So, after the last dlc came out I completely regret pre-ordering the game and purchasing the season pass for the full price. Because Rogue one dlc is a copy paste from the previous dlc.
    This game was made with a minimum of effort by EA, the developers didn't have to create this "good looking" empty aberration from a scratch, they already had its predecessors and they should keep some
    So, after the last dlc came out I completely regret pre-ordering the game and purchasing the season pass for the full price. Because Rogue one dlc is a copy paste from the previous dlc.
    This game was made with a minimum of effort by EA, the developers didn't have to create this "good looking" empty aberration from a scratch, they already had its predecessors and they should keep some essential mechanisms like the use of ships and vehicles, the "classes" selection, the planets system and not the "pick up", the "star cards" and like 8 planets ****
    And the worst is that EA even didn’t wait a year to say (hey we know we made mistakes with the actual BATTLEFRONT so the next year BATTLEFRONT 2 will have all the things that the 1 didn't have, so **** you!!, you will have to pay us a complete extra game with all the **** dlc so you can almost enjoy the complete Star Wars "experience", because being honest we are going to release a BATTLEFRONT 3 with all the things that the 1 and the 2 didn't had)
    There are no pros and cons for me, only that this game sucks.
    Don’t buy the next "Battlefront" so we can send a message to EA and their "brilliant ideas".
    Expand
  40. Dec 10, 2016
    9
    I gave this game 9 out of 10 points for 3 main reasons.

    1) The first is visual graphics - it's one of the most beautiful games I played. 2) The second is Star Wars feeling - It really seems like you are in the movie. Everything is true to the original franchise: heroes, blasters, AT-AT, environment and so on. 3) The third is hatred, that generated this game. I suppose, it doesn't
    I gave this game 9 out of 10 points for 3 main reasons.

    1) The first is visual graphics - it's one of the most beautiful games I played.

    2) The second is Star Wars feeling - It really seems like you are in the movie. Everything is true to the original franchise: heroes, blasters, AT-AT, environment and so on.

    3) The third is hatred, that generated this game. I suppose, it doesn't deserve that harsh attitude. I guess, the reason for that is the price and the lack of content without DLC. I really think that this product deserve better treatment.

    What I don't like:

    1) Battlefront chaos. Really, the gameplay is a mess. You are getting killed from behind, from the left, from he right.

    2) Balance is pretty bad. It's almost a rule that there are no equal games. 90% of the time one of the teams stomps another.

    3) To level up you need to grind really hard.

    But anyway, this game gives such a profound Star Wars experience, that I recommend you to try it.
    Expand
  41. Nov 6, 2016
    2
    A pretty garbage game. It's like one of those super shiny products that look amazing, then it turns out to be an overpriced turd. I'm not sure how any one that isn't a dedicated Star Wars fan could play this game consistently and say they like it. The ONLY good thing Battlefront has going for it is its atmosphere. It bloody feels amazing and immerses you fully into the universe of StarA pretty garbage game. It's like one of those super shiny products that look amazing, then it turns out to be an overpriced turd. I'm not sure how any one that isn't a dedicated Star Wars fan could play this game consistently and say they like it. The ONLY good thing Battlefront has going for it is its atmosphere. It bloody feels amazing and immerses you fully into the universe of Star Wars. Unfortunately, that wears off, and what you have left is gameplay that feels more akin to a phone app. Heroes vs Villains was the only mode I genuinely enjoyed, because it felt like it had some depth to it, a sort of rock paper scissors style, if you will. DLC has cut its already small player base in half by making its desperately needed content only available to people who paid out the ass for this crap.

    All EA had to do was take the greatly loved concepts of the earlier Battlefronts and slap their beautiful atmosphere on top of it, and I guarantee this review I'm writing would've been much, much higher.
    Expand
  42. Nov 2, 2016
    1
    Man this game was pretty.

    Otherwise it was a money grabbing, arcade, dirty casual pile of crap. Thanks EA for letting me try it for 2 hours, but thanks even more for the refund.
  43. Oct 18, 2016
    5
    Its ok for a star wars fan. Graphics is really great, AT-AT mode is quite interesting but dont expect the game to be fun for more than a few days. Actually if they only put the gameplay of the good old BF 2142 into this game, it would be much better. Gameplay in SW battlefront isnt really developed or advanced .
  44. Oct 6, 2016
    0
    A piece of junk. Hackers are abundant. Same netcode issues as Battlefield 4. Same silly bugs as Battlefield 4 that never seem to be fixed. Real content is subsituted with starcards and pickups, most of which are useless.
  45. Sep 25, 2016
    0
    Very bad dlc selling platform. If you want to win you need dlc, want to win people with dlc? get never dlc. p2w game sold for 60$ and has a 50$ p2w pass. As it has no singleplayer it's unplayable without dlc.
  46. Aug 26, 2016
    0
    nice graphic, goood frames, very goood sound, but the marketing with the dlc realy cashow. another ea lie game. and the gameplay more boring, buy this game not
  47. Jul 29, 2016
    5
    The game looks nice and plays fluently. Most of the stuff is well balanced, but it's far too much about grinding and purchasing DLC. Team Fortress 2 is a free-to-play title, and it's less greedy than this 50€ game. Very awkward, I'm asking you not support this.
  48. Jun 24, 2016
    1
    Ok.. so before the DLC, I was happy. I would rate it 8/10.. Now, the game becomes a pay to play, pay extra to win, so now it's a firm 1/10.

    In the new DLC, they introduce overpowered guns like EE4, cards like Disruption which instantly overheat your gun, and shock grenade that locks you on the ground for some 2 seconds even if you spam R key... And then the game starts to look so ugly.
    Ok.. so before the DLC, I was happy. I would rate it 8/10.. Now, the game becomes a pay to play, pay extra to win, so now it's a firm 1/10.

    In the new DLC, they introduce overpowered guns like EE4, cards like Disruption which instantly overheat your gun, and shock grenade that locks you on the ground for some 2 seconds even if you spam R key... And then the game starts to look so ugly.

    Since the day before yesterday, ppl start to jump into the enemy, use disruption card, and then rape the fking whole group of ppl up with EE4. It is not unusual for one guy to kill some 10 ppl with these overpowered sh*ts. EE4 alone is so overpowered in close combat already, 5 shoot burst with so much damage, it's two shot kill, instant kill! it rapes EE3 down to the ground, up to the sky, and then back to the ground again. Now everyone who purchased the DLC is switching to EE4, and I only managed to kill those ppl a few times using EE3.

    This is so bad. This is pay to play, pay extra to win. Fk off EA, Fk off Dice, Fk off Start War Battlefront. I played Dice games since BC2, and nvr lose my faith even playing that unfinished BF4 ffs. But today, I'm done with this. Go fk yourself with your money grabber EA, karma will fk you back soon enough.
    Expand
  49. Jun 17, 2016
    2
    I had to create a metacritic account since this game is such a disappointment. Granted it looks and sounds perfect, it's an extreme immersion in the world of Star Wars. But it's terrible at being a game, the balancing doesn't feel right, there is an extreme lack of content for the price, and the DLC model doesn't help. I've never played an FPS that was so linear like Star Wars Battlefront,I had to create a metacritic account since this game is such a disappointment. Granted it looks and sounds perfect, it's an extreme immersion in the world of Star Wars. But it's terrible at being a game, the balancing doesn't feel right, there is an extreme lack of content for the price, and the DLC model doesn't help. I've never played an FPS that was so linear like Star Wars Battlefront, you have at best 10h of content before having explored everything. But the saddest part is there is no customer support, bugs have been in the game for months now, and no patch since despite the community harassing EA and DICE for fixes. A few of those bugs are event game breaking, the "HsVV" gamemode has been broken for two months as of the day of this review. There is also a lack of attention for PC players, you can't actually choose what map or gamemode you want to play, you'll get put back into a playlist of modes that you'll have to play, the game is riddled with hackers that have been reported countless times, but EA who is responsible for actions against hackers has taken none, want a taste? Google "LordSnowNL". They are very view PC players now. If you really want to play this game, buy it on sale on consoles, and don't buy the stupid deluxe edition, it doesn't offer any exclusive content. Expand
  50. Jun 11, 2016
    5
    Amazing attention to details, awesome sound effects and above-par graphics, plus this is Star Wars - what could possibly go wrong? Er how about no single-player campaign, no tactical depth and lots of little irritations that made me go back to Red Orchestra: Rising Storm, and Battlefield 3 - after about 10 hours. That being said, I had a little bit of fun for those hours, but the game justAmazing attention to details, awesome sound effects and above-par graphics, plus this is Star Wars - what could possibly go wrong? Er how about no single-player campaign, no tactical depth and lots of little irritations that made me go back to Red Orchestra: Rising Storm, and Battlefield 3 - after about 10 hours. That being said, I had a little bit of fun for those hours, but the game just doesn't have the staying power. This, and that god awful new movie, major disappointment! Expand
  51. Jun 8, 2016
    1
    Un ROBO en su máxima expresión con un alto costo de salida , sin campaña y con un par de mapa . Así Electronic Art trata a sus usuarios con desprecio , como fans de Star Wars me indigna que por salir en el estreno de la película iría como zombi sin cerebro a comprar esta mierda sin campaña , sin contenidos y con dos o tres mapa . jajaja
    Ahora vienen a decir que habrá mas Star Wars
    Un ROBO en su máxima expresión con un alto costo de salida , sin campaña y con un par de mapa . Así Electronic Art trata a sus usuarios con desprecio , como fans de Star Wars me indigna que por salir en el estreno de la película iría como zombi sin cerebro a comprar esta mierda sin campaña , sin contenidos y con dos o tres mapa . jajaja
    Ahora vienen a decir que habrá mas Star Wars Battlefront para los dos próximo años me parece que a los usuarios los toman de estúpidos , niño rata .
    NO VALE LA PENA NI AHORA NI EN LOS PRÓXIMOS AÑOS SI NO CAMBIAR ESTA MANERA DE CAGARSE EN NUESTRAS CARAS .
    Expand
  52. Jun 2, 2016
    1
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This game should be called Star Wars Battlefield, not Star Wars Battlefront. I do not consider this game part of the Battlefront series. And even as a "Battlefield" game, it is lacking.

    In short, I am very disappointed in the game.

    We all spent a lot of money on this game for so little replay value and overall content. I am also disgusted that we all have to fork out even more money to acquire content that should have been included in the initial release.

    No campaign, no space battles, lack of maps, stupid "star cards" system, get very boring very quickly (We have done about 38 hours with 4 people and we are all already sick of it), etc (The list goes on).

    The most annoying thing of all is that I could not, and cannot, refund it.

    I cannot say that it is all bad, the graphics and sound mechanics are unquestionably beautiful. They are just stunning and you can see a lot of effort was put in.

    But overall, I give this game 1/10 as it is just not what we wanted, they could have done so much better and to be frank I think they are just being greedy in the whole money aspect.
    Expand
  53. May 28, 2016
    8
    So far, I love Speeder Bike. But only this.
    It's great.
    I give score 0. But Only for Speeder Bike. I gave it 8. I love it. Darth Vader, The Emperor, Jedi, Stormtrooper, X-wing gameplay are horrible. If there is Stormtrooper, Droids. I might like it. I just hate that the character dies too easily. I hate it. Character walking around. Too many enemies. Areas are huge. I don't
    So far, I love Speeder Bike. But only this.
    It's great.

    I give score 0. But Only for Speeder Bike. I gave it 8. I love it.

    Darth Vader, The Emperor, Jedi, Stormtrooper, X-wing gameplay are horrible.

    If there is Stormtrooper, Droids. I might like it.

    I just hate that the character dies too easily. I hate it. Character walking around. Too many enemies. Areas are huge. I don't like it. I want area to be small. Area like Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six 3: Raven Shield and SWAT 4. You can play around in one area.
    Expand
  54. May 24, 2016
    1
    Full of nerds, hackers..... level 1player vs lvl50..LOL
    Crazy, stupid game with stupid players/hackers. Respawn kills; I hate this game, no fun, no Star Wars feeling. Idiot running-jumping-shooting game. NO SINGLE PLAYER???NO AI BATTLES??? **** u EA.
    gameplay: 0/10
    repayability:1/10
    Star Wars theme: 6/10
    audio: 8/10
    graphics: 10/10
  55. May 21, 2016
    2
    I gave EA/DICE a chance on this one. I don't splurge 60$ for a video game often, but I loved the Battlefront games growing up, so I had to get this one. Unfortunately, I don't have a PlayStation or XBox, so I had to get it for PC via Origin. After hours of downloading, I open it up, look around a little, and my first thought was "is this it?". Yes, it was. Unlike the original BattlefrontI gave EA/DICE a chance on this one. I don't splurge 60$ for a video game often, but I loved the Battlefront games growing up, so I had to get this one. Unfortunately, I don't have a PlayStation or XBox, so I had to get it for PC via Origin. After hours of downloading, I open it up, look around a little, and my first thought was "is this it?". Yes, it was. Unlike the original Battlefront games, there is little single player "instant action" type game modes. Only two, both being a team deathmatch of sorts that gets old after a couple plays. I get that the main feature of this game is its online play, so I checked that out. It took forever to load, and several disconnects from EA servers (which are terrible by the way), but I finally got in and explored the game modes. The number of maps is limited; only four planets with different maps on each one. Most of the game modes are forgettable - mostly they boil down to spawn, kill, die, repeat. I don't see any aspect of skill improvement; most of it's just luck in where you spawn and managing to shoot straight.

    The specifics are a drag as well. The guns, which vary based on rate of fire, range, and damage, are unlocked via leveling up, which is only done by playing multiplayer. Likewise, skins for your rebel or imperial character are unlocked the same way. They aren't exciting, just different faces, hair styles, and eventually species/armor changes such as Twi'leks and shadowtroopers. The season path is simply ridiculous. It's 50 more bucks and you get some average guns and more maps, making almost a pay-to-win FPS.

    A little more specifics: power ups. Instead of hopping in an X-Wing that is sitting around, you pick up a glowing power up thing, hold a button, and magically appear in the air, flying the X-Wing (just an example of the debilitation of gameplay).

    What EA has done here is sold a bare-bones game and added expensive DLC, knowing that people will buy it because of TFA hype and the necessity for further enjoyment in an otherwise dull game. I guess they put all their resources into graphics and audio and simply forgot that there's a pretty important aspect called gameplay (the graphics, to be fair, are pretty incredible, and the audio is reminiscent of a real Star Wars battle).

    I'm going to sound cliché here, but EA had beautiful references to work with, even if they were a decade old. Those games were unique, ahead of their time, and provided endless hours of fun in a variety of ways. Instead, it feels like a COD-esque game with a dash of Star Wars, with rushed fundamentals thrown together in time to hit shelves at optimal time and profit.
    Expand
  56. May 20, 2016
    3
    Visuals - 100/100
    Game play (on foot) - 90/100
    Game play (in vehicle) - 55/100 Story (non existent) - 0/100 Price for Content - 25/100 (Recommended buy for no more than $20.00) This game is a hollow shell, of what the Star Wars: Battlefront series once was. It has completely disregard the single player campaign central to the series before. They have also cut down on most of the
    Visuals - 100/100
    Game play (on foot) - 90/100
    Game play (in vehicle) - 55/100
    Story (non existent) - 0/100
    Price for Content - 25/100 (Recommended buy for no more than $20.00)

    This game is a hollow shell, of what the Star Wars: Battlefront series once was. It has completely disregard the single player campaign central to the series before. They have also cut down on most of the game modes, and number of Hero characters you can play (Luke, Leia, Han, Vader, etc.) In stead we have a generic Shooter with relativity small map sizes, Similar to a Call of Duty game, with a shiny Star Wars paint job to attract fans. The little single player they offer is lack luster and has 0 replayability. They have taken out most of the loved game modes from the previous two battlefront games. Including the much loved galactic conquest mode. They have also Left the clone wars out, instead focusing only on the Rebellion and Empire. All in all this is a Horrid Reboot that has about as much content as a Expensive bit of DLC. A better purchase, even with the servers offline, is the other two battlefront games. You would still be getting more for your money with those.
    Expand
  57. May 20, 2016
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. EA Didn't Really Finish What LucasArts Started
    I’ve loved the Star Wars Battlefront games since I was a kid but EAs version was a little disappointing. These games are based around the Star Wars Universe where you travel the galaxy and have epic battles. The first two Battlefront games were very good. In these old games there were three game modes: Campaign, Galactic Conquest, and the best game mode of them all Instant Action. In Campaign you fight in the battles from the movies in chronological order. There is the Galactic Civil War and the Clone War Era campaigns you can play through. In Galactic Conquest you and the enemy fight for different planet's using your troops and other items such as reinforcements to win the battles. Whoever captures all the planets first wins and conquers the galaxy. In the Instant Action battles you choose wherever you want to go battle and then your era and then your side and go to battle.
    In the new Battlefront many things have changed. The graphics have improved and that's a very good change. The bad changes however are that EA has completely gotten rid of the classic battlefront style. There's no Instant Action, Campaign, or Galactic Conquest. They have also gotten rid of the class selection. With the class selection you got to choose one of 6 or 7 (depending on the game) classes. There was Normal Trooper, Sniper, Engineer, a Rocket Launcher character and special classes such as Jet Trooper or Wookiee Warrior. Instead in the new game you make your own character and choose all their abilities and guns. I am very disappointed in that decision because it is unfair. You could have a character with the best gun in the game and another character with the worst gun in the same game and that's unfair to the character with the worst gun. In the new game you have to level up by killing people, killing heroes, taking command posts etc. The worse level you are the worse guns there are available. There are also only 4 maps whereas the other games had 20 give or take a few. These 20 maps were planets from all the movies and that were very unique and fun.
    The vehicle mechanics have also changed dramatically. Instead of vehicles scattered throughout the map where you can hop on even if it's your enemies tank it's little vehicle icons around the map where you get and suddenly get transported into your vehicle. I strongly dislike this change and I think they should have kept the vehicle mechanics the same because they were better than the current ones. They were easy and actually let you get in the vehicle and get out and didn't magically teleport you into a vehicle.
    Another feature that has changed is the heroes. In this game there are 4 per side (but more will be added in future dlcs). In the first game there were computer heroes based on your era. In the second game there is approximately 10 or so per side if you choose Hero Assault mode in Instant Action otherwise there is a specific hero you can be on each side depending on the map. In the second game you get your main weapon and a force power or infantry power such as grenades. In this new game there is two heroes with lightsabers Luke Skywalker and Darth Vader. They can use two strike moves and dash move. The hero's without a lightsaber are Princess Leia, Han Solo, Nien Nunb, Emperor Palpatine, Boba Fett, and Greedo. They all have different moves such as Greedo's Dioxide Grenade or Leias Squad shield. These moves are very powerful and maybe just a little overpowered. I like the new hero mechanics but also miss the old ones too.
    In this game you only get to be in the Galactic Civil War Era whereas in the older games you could be in the Clone War Era. With the release of Star Wars the Force Awakens you'd think that there'd be a era for that in this game but no. I wish they would add this but they probably wont. I am looking forward to the Bespin and Death Star Dlcs which will add a lot of new things. They are going to add two heros per dlc and The Death Star and Bespin maps! Hopefully Cloud City and Bespin platforms from the old games will be part of the dlc!
    I overall think this game is good but not my favorite of the Battlefront Series. Im sad that they took out the original battlefronts style and mechanics but it makes the game a little better too. I recommended you buy this if you love Star Wars and The Battlefront Games. Have fun playing and may the force be with you!
    Game: EA Star Wars Battlefront
    Developers: EA DICE, LucasFilm LTD
    Publishers: Electronic Arts (EA)
    Price: $39.99 or Season Pass Edition: $59.99
    Platform: PC, Playstation 4, Xbox One
    Rating: T
    Expand
  58. May 18, 2016
    0
    The makers of this game keep claiming "we wanted the multiplayer aspect of the original." Understandable, but they must've never played the original. The original had MP aspect through Campaigns, which made it amazing. This is just pure "lol CoD-Star Wars". Totally lame.
  59. May 15, 2016
    3
    The game looks beautiful but the good points end there. The game modes and mechanics are all very blah. I played 4 hours and uninstalled the game. If they would have put half the effort into game play and mechanics that they put into graphics it would have been a really good game.
  60. May 15, 2016
    0
    worst piece of crap ever, they take my review down even though ive played it on all three platforms. censoring us but still cant stem the tide of negative reviews.
    its my honest opinion that a 0 score will do more for the industry than caving to the content light games we are getting lately.
    veska can **** off, rates it a 10 hypocrite
  61. May 11, 2016
    1
    Is anyone really surprised EA managed to completely mess up and butcher a decent title? This game is terrible and soooo boring. You get sick of this fast. When you play a game like overwatch, you realize just what a pathetic game this is.
  62. May 9, 2016
    2
    The pc version of the game is dead. The available games you can find range from 1 to 2, and usually they are not typically filled. Consoles versions are apparently populated but buying it on the pc is just a waste of money at this point... Not that it wasnt to begin with.
  63. May 7, 2016
    7
    Star Wars Battlefront has the atmosphere of that galaxy far, far away that can satisfies anyone, Star Wars fan or not. Yet the lack of contents and gameplay depth make the game feel like the first episode of the prequels.
  64. May 5, 2016
    1
    The worst Multiplayer Game i have played in a while.
    The Graphics are 99/10 but the gameplay is -100/10.
    This game is made for the casual gamer, just join a game shoot, run and game over or win...no tactic, no thinking just hit your left mouse button and the wasd-keys... The game itself has not much modes, stupid unlocks and way more unfair Heroes you can play. The maps are looking big
    The worst Multiplayer Game i have played in a while.
    The Graphics are 99/10 but the gameplay is -100/10.
    This game is made for the casual gamer, just join a game shoot, run and game over or win...no tactic, no thinking just hit your left mouse button and the wasd-keys...
    The game itself has not much modes, stupid unlocks and way more unfair Heroes you can play.
    The maps are looking big but there not, you can only play in a tiny part of them, also invisible walls and a LOT of jumping because you can not jump one time to get over a little rock, no you need like 10 times.
    Also the spawn system is stupid, you never know where you spawn, you can not pick your spawn, you have no map, just a little stupid radar icon.
    This game is the worst dice has made and they made battlefield 2142...
    Expand
  65. May 4, 2016
    2
    DON'T BUY ... In summary
    Graphics 10/10
    Sound 8/10 Gameplay 1/10 Replayability 1/10 Besides the PC version is quite full of incredible people who can kill you seeing trhougth walls or with two shoots (hackers) and EA never kick they out, I've seen team with incredible people who shoot you 1 second after you go outdoors, who can kill you with 3 shoots after you hit them 5 times, the
    DON'T BUY ... In summary
    Graphics 10/10
    Sound 8/10
    Gameplay 1/10
    Replayability 1/10
    Besides the PC version is quite full of incredible people who can kill you seeing trhougth walls or with two shoots (hackers) and EA never kick they out, I've seen team with incredible people who shoot you 1 second after you go outdoors, who can kill you with 3 shoots after you hit them 5 times, the perks are unbalanced and the gameplay is quite generic
    Expand
  66. May 2, 2016
    0
    A horrible experience. 90% of my deaths don't make sense. There's no proper kill cam to show me how I died to ease this confusion. Balance is very bad, which is a trait EA's past few shooters have. Matchmaking is the worst. COD does matchmaking better. It's always one team getting butt raped by the other. The fairness just doesn't seem to be there. There are nearly no fair matches. IA horrible experience. 90% of my deaths don't make sense. There's no proper kill cam to show me how I died to ease this confusion. Balance is very bad, which is a trait EA's past few shooters have. Matchmaking is the worst. COD does matchmaking better. It's always one team getting butt raped by the other. The fairness just doesn't seem to be there. There are nearly no fair matches. I understand that war isn't really fair, but this is a game, and not real war. Fairness can be controlled.

    What else? SPAWNING. GOOD GOD BRO. SERIOUSLY. How hard is it to have a decent spawn system? It's like they don't even care. Half of my deaths in many games are from spawning right in front of an enemy.

    Gameplay is horrific. I feel embarrassed for buying this game and I am VERY thankful I did not buy the expansion pack. That's some money I'm happy I have saved.

    Graphics are great tho! That's it! Everything else is horrible.
    Expand
  67. Apr 16, 2016
    1
    This game is definitely not what I was hoping for after waiting for years for a sequel to two of my favorite games of all time (Star Wars Battlefront 1&2). This is not a Battlefront game. It is a shame because I might haven given this game a 5/10 had they just called the game Star Wars Battlefield. This game is more like Battlefield then it is Battlefront. You are practically paying forThis game is definitely not what I was hoping for after waiting for years for a sequel to two of my favorite games of all time (Star Wars Battlefront 1&2). This is not a Battlefront game. It is a shame because I might haven given this game a 5/10 had they just called the game Star Wars Battlefield. This game is more like Battlefield then it is Battlefront. You are practically paying for half a game since they are adding more maps through a $60 season pass. With the lack of replay value and game play that makes me cringe I can not recommend this game to anyone. Expand
  68. Apr 13, 2016
    0
    Graphics, Sounds? The best a game can get this year and probably the next. But gameplay wise? Its trash. Replayability? Trash. I am a die hard star wars fan, I am a die hard battlefield and old battlefront fan but this.... its so casualized to its roots you get bored of this game after few hours. Into the trash it goes. I want my money back.
  69. Apr 3, 2016
    8
    Fun game. It has breathtaking graphics and is very addicting. There is a problem with DLC and it isn't even close to being as good as previous installments, but a very good game regardless.
  70. Mar 22, 2016
    6
    This game's Battlefield, with characters doing Star Wars cosplaying. The engine's same but at another "world"....to spend a lot of time killing imperial soldiers you can try, and would like it. This game's so boring sometimes, but when hero icon appears the emotion begins...
    Nice game, not too much
  71. Mar 20, 2016
    4
    Clearly they did not use the force with this one!

    Although the game looks great and you really feel like you are in Star Wars. That soon wears off as you realise that the initial excitement is all there is to it. Also there´s no campaign. The multi player mode is a mess as players spawn all over the place making strategy and team work pointless. The survival mode is too easy on
    Clearly they did not use the force with this one!

    Although the game looks great and you really feel like you are in Star Wars. That soon wears off as you realise that the initial excitement is all there is to it.

    Also there´s no campaign. The multi player mode is a mess as players spawn all over the place making strategy and team work pointless. The survival mode is too easy on normal level and too hard on hard level (I didn't even try master level). You cannot save your game progress which puts a lot of pressure on your playing through 15 very hard rounds of battle. Especially if you get stuck in a wall (which is easier than you might think). There no way out but suicide which sucks hard when the game is this tight and every life matters.

    I had looked forward to trying out different vehicles but now I just avoid them. The most fun is the speed bikes on Endor but you only get one (yes one!) training mission with them. They could have been a whole game within a game if players could have raced against each other.

    The aim on walkers is completely off meaning you have to fire well above your target to hit it. Same with other vehicles and ground based guns. The x-wings are not fun to fly or dog fight in and targeting anything on the ground is impossible without crashing.

    Of course not all is bad. There are some great things in this game but it does not matter how great and cool Luke Skywalker is when the empire has these lame Jumping StormTroopers with automatic shields and flying kits. Worse are the invisible Shadow troopers. Now because of realism i'm sure, my gun overheats quickly - fair enough - but at the same time Shadow Troopers take 5-10 shots to the face at close range before dying which means you have to hold the trigger down. Very disappointing that im subject to realism but the empire is not!

    But what I really miss is a campaign with lots of iconic scenery that you can play through in your own while enjoying the whole atmosphere and vibe of say Hoth.

    Last but not least. The game is ridiculous expensive in itself and with more expansions to come EA is asking for even more money later. Had it been worth it I might even have considered.

    But oh boy. What a great missed opportunity! Although the game does look great :)
    Expand
  72. Mar 13, 2016
    1
    This game is the worst battlefront ever. This battlefront has a lack of contents huge like grand canyon. They took star wars name and in his name sold a incomplete, boring and trivial title. And like always all maps wll be released with DLCs. I hope this game will lost all of users before first dlc will be available.
  73. Mar 13, 2016
    1
    Nearly a decade ago developers delivered Battlefront 2 and showed how to make a great game. How are you supposed to rate this game any higher, missing all the important parts of gameplay and content we already had 10 years ago!

    Too dissapointed to write much more. A summary: Multiplayer has a lot of cheaters, EA is not banning. No server browser. No modding possible. Dead on pc
    Nearly a decade ago developers delivered Battlefront 2 and showed how to make a great game. How are you supposed to rate this game any higher, missing all the important parts of gameplay and content we already had 10 years ago!

    Too dissapointed to write much more. A summary:

    Multiplayer has a lot of cheaters, EA is not banning.
    No server browser.
    No modding possible.
    Dead on pc and dying on consoles aswell.
    Little content. Few maps/ map recycle.
    No spawn selection and broken fighter spawns (you can be shot down before you can react).
    Weapon selection hardly makes a difference (only long/short range makes a difference).
    Expand
  74. Mar 12, 2016
    0
    One of the most blatant, money grabbing dlc scandals of the next generation. I have to WAIT to PAY for more of the game in expensive upcoming DLC expansions. I hope EA is regreting this scam. I also hope you people are regretting buying this, because you have been wronged.
  75. Mar 12, 2016
    3
    Buy this from gamestop, play walker assault and heros vs villians, return in less than 7 days for a full cash refund, you just played everything battlefront has to offer for free!
  76. Mar 9, 2016
    3
    Star Wars Battlefront looks beautiful and still runs great, managing to stay over 100 fps on my 980 Ti/i7 4790k on ultra settings in 1440p without any overclocking past my factory overclock. Post processing injectors can make it look EVEN MORE beautiful at the cost of some performance. In layman's terms, it's really pretty and easy to run.

    That's the extent of the pros of Battlefront. I
    Star Wars Battlefront looks beautiful and still runs great, managing to stay over 100 fps on my 980 Ti/i7 4790k on ultra settings in 1440p without any overclocking past my factory overclock. Post processing injectors can make it look EVEN MORE beautiful at the cost of some performance. In layman's terms, it's really pretty and easy to run.

    That's the extent of the pros of Battlefront. I got it on sale for $30 and it still felt like a ripoff. Offline options are limited to premade "missions" that all feel the same and don't offer much replayability, although they do provide a good opportunity to sort of "preview" each weapon in the game to see which one suits you best once you unlock it. The multiplayer is entertaining if you can manage to get put into a game with balanced teams and good ping; Battlefront doesn't let you choose servers, and even if you leave a game due to poor connection or imbalance, it will frequently put you into the same server upon searching over and over again. Starting weapons completely suck compared to higher-level monsters such as the EE-3 or DL-44, the latter of which you can conveniently unlock if you pay for it (though it has received a nerf since it's starting overpoweredness, it is still quite powerful). Luckily, the first two guns you unlock, the DLT-19 and DH-17, are both very powerful weapons in their own right. The delay on unlocking many game-changing cards makes the lower levels feel like you're a serious underdog, and can be satisfying if you outwit and outperform all those level 50 Shadow Troopers and Twi'leks with their fancy gear.

    Overall, if all you're looking for is a Star Wars simulator with great graphics, wait for this to go on sale. Personally, I'd say this game is worth around $15 to $20. The $60 asking price is like someone selling you a can of your favorite drink for $60 because it has a fancy can cover. Sure, the can cover is fancy and looks nice, but is that really worth a whole sixty dollars?
    Expand
  77. Mar 4, 2016
    3
    Was cool at first, but now it wants more money so it can sustain a habit.

    OK, so, this game does an amazing job of making you feel like your life is "Star Wars". As in the sound, the sight, the overall atmospheric feel of the game exudes that warm, fuzzy nostalgic feeling.............but that just comes crashing down after a few hours of playing. This game is a hollow shell that a bunch
    Was cool at first, but now it wants more money so it can sustain a habit.

    OK, so, this game does an amazing job of making you feel like your life is "Star Wars". As in the sound, the sight, the overall atmospheric feel of the game exudes that warm, fuzzy nostalgic feeling.............but that just comes crashing down after a few hours of playing. This game is a hollow shell that a bunch of us chumps paid full price for. It doesn't even feel like half a game. Maybe my sense of disappointment stems from the fact that I may have set my expectations to high, but even if I had expected to be disappointed so I could POSSIBLY be surprised by Star Wars Battlefront, I would still be disappointed by how hollow and insubstantial an experience this game was.

    As of when i'm writing this review now, at 5pm AEST on the 5th of March, this game is nearly dead, I can't even find a game in any of the more populated servers anymore.

    To whomever though it would be a good idea to cut the game into bits and sell to us piecemeal (speculation) or to release this game in the state it is and ask for a full $90 AUD (for the base game!) should know that they suck balls and for ruining what should have been the best iteration of Star Wars Battlefront after 2 superb installments but instead we get a really shiny and smartly dressed turd..........
    Expand
  78. Mar 4, 2016
    0
    I can just copy some stuff out of the Reviews before since they got the same Opinion like me.

    Graphics: 10/10 Audio:10/10 Star Wars Theme: 10/10 Gameplay: 1/10 Replayability: 1/10 I bought it, downloaded it, checked how less missions and coop stuff there is. You can't play like in the old SW battlefronts on mp maps vs bots, just fullfil missions which is terrible. Immediately
    I can just copy some stuff out of the Reviews before since they got the same Opinion like me.

    Graphics: 10/10
    Audio:10/10
    Star Wars Theme: 10/10
    Gameplay: 1/10
    Replayability: 1/10

    I bought it, downloaded it, checked how less missions and coop stuff there is. You can't play like in the old SW battlefronts on mp maps vs bots, just fullfil missions which is terrible. Immediately refunded my money, worst 32 gbs of crap i ever had on my HDD. We should sue them for how they raped SW battlefront - it has nothing to do with the Games before (which i personally loved - had over 5k hours on sw bf2 on ps2)

    Shame on you ea and dice.
    Expand
  79. Mar 4, 2016
    0
    oh my god, what a piece of utter garbage this game is.
    don't give them money, never buy their games. EVER this game is an insult to star wars fans and gamers in general.
  80. Mar 1, 2016
    1
    This game is an absolute insult to anyone who thought this game was going to be like the original battlefronts. EA has once again grabbed your cash with high valued marketing and resources in order to justify another crappy release.

    The game is beautiful in its presentation and its sound is outstanding however that is all that is all the positive remarks I will make of this "game".
    This game is an absolute insult to anyone who thought this game was going to be like the original battlefronts. EA has once again grabbed your cash with high valued marketing and resources in order to justify another crappy release.

    The game is beautiful in its presentation and its sound is outstanding however that is all that is all the positive remarks I will make of this "game".

    EA Battlefront is quite simply COD with lasers. There is never no coordination between team members, random deaths occur literally moments from being spawned into a map whether it be from a random grenade or air-strafing run, poor map design with people being spawned killed and no balance between the rebels and the empire.

    There is no single player to speak of, I will not be including Battlefront's "Missions, Tutorials and Horde modes' because they are not even considered value. On PC unless you sign up for "walker assault" you will not be able to join any game because there is NO ONE playing them. There are NET code issues which is keeping true to the usual EA server's which means unless your directly hooked into your modem your going to experience lag and disconnections to the servers.

    The weapons are pathetic as well as its progression system. Lasers are inaccurate and impossible to predict. The better weapons in the game are locked behind a leveling wall which means new players are going to be in for a rough time for the first 8 hours or so unless they of course quit by then. The card slots where equipment and perks is completely idiotic, 9/10 of them once again are obtained through useless grinding of levels and even then must obtain credits in order to purchase them.

    There is no balance within the game regarding the factions. Rebels get NO ground vehicles apart from a speeder on endor, the empire get a ATST which if is marched into a spawn zone will annihilate everyone within seconds. Aircraft within the game is also unbalanced. The rebels aircraft absolutely incinerate everything ground or air within seconds, the A-Wing is stupidly overpowered with a shield that regenerates faster then wolverine on meth.

    Battlefront is an insult to gaming and once again EA has delivered a very unoriginal and thought out game. Even if Battlefront was more like Battlefield 4 it would of been a better game then what it is now, clearly EA's targeted audience for this was young children sitting on the couch with their consoles because this is not a game for even your average gamer. The DLC and season pass for this game is so uninspiring and predicted as it cost almost the entire price of the base game. Sims 4 is a clear example of where EA games is heading in the next years with its overpriced DLC and outrageous practices and Battlefront is no exception.

    EA games have officially killed the sims series, killed Command and Conquer and now your just killed Star wars battlefront. Good on you ya **** wankers, hope your proud of your accomplishments. Sales of this game means nothing in comparison to how pissed off everyone is right now.
    Expand
  81. Feb 26, 2016
    1
    Good graphics, but horrible online gameplay. Totally unbalanced and hostile to new players. Skill does not matter here, you are always outgunned unless you unlock all the best weapons and gear at higher level. If you like getting killed by the same player in a OP vehicle over and over again, you will love this game. Not much content, too few maps, no single-player. I do not recommend thisGood graphics, but horrible online gameplay. Totally unbalanced and hostile to new players. Skill does not matter here, you are always outgunned unless you unlock all the best weapons and gear at higher level. If you like getting killed by the same player in a OP vehicle over and over again, you will love this game. Not much content, too few maps, no single-player. I do not recommend this game. Do not buy it, Expand
  82. Feb 23, 2016
    3
    I was so hyped om this game when it came out and my hype litteraly died after first 3 walker assault games.It was so boring and frustrating to play when a players spawn behind you or at your base.A lot of people saying that this game is reskin of battlefield 4 well it would be cool if it would be truth,it s nothing even close to battlefield 4 the game which has competetive multiplayerI was so hyped om this game when it came out and my hype litteraly died after first 3 walker assault games.It was so boring and frustrating to play when a players spawn behind you or at your base.A lot of people saying that this game is reskin of battlefield 4 well it would be cool if it would be truth,it s nothing even close to battlefield 4 the game which has competetive multiplayer which allows you to improve not like in battlefront who spawns behind wins the fight.And about all content which is about to come out as a season pass form are you joking me?50euros for a season pass?Yes it may have some iconic maps and moments from the Star Wars movies but its to expensive to the most gamers and just average people who want to relieve Star Wars battles them selves in a game.P.S. As a fellow youtuber boogie2988 said And i cant agree more with this argument about Battlefront.
    And I almost forgot my ratings Im giving Battlefront a weak 4 just for the amazing graphics and audio as far as gameplay and season pass thing goes i cant give it more than 1,so 3 will be my final rating for this game.
    Expand
  83. Feb 22, 2016
    8
    Battlefront straight up is a good game, If you like or even love the Star Wars franchise this game is for you!
    It looks, sounds and acts 100% Star Wars, The MEGA pricey season pass is not as great though. This is the closest you will get to being a Stormtrooper or a Rebel Scum!
  84. Feb 20, 2016
    7
    Despues de probarlo varias veces,me doy cuenta de que sigue siendo repetitivo,falta un campaña :'v (aunque despues de la compra de LucasArt a Disney seria dificil ponerla)
  85. Feb 20, 2016
    2
    Only thing, thats good about this game is gameplay and the fact that this is a star wars game. Everything else is so bad, bugs, glitches (after last update game crashes after first kill in match and you have to restart your PC xDD) WTF EA?! We are paying 60 usd plus DLC, which you must get because there so little content that after 3 months from premier 95% of player had already maxed outOnly thing, thats good about this game is gameplay and the fact that this is a star wars game. Everything else is so bad, bugs, glitches (after last update game crashes after first kill in match and you have to restart your PC xDD) WTF EA?! We are paying 60 usd plus DLC, which you must get because there so little content that after 3 months from premier 95% of player had already maxed out on level, weapons etc. If you thinking about buying this game... don't! Expand
  86. Feb 19, 2016
    4
    "Star Wars: Battlefront is perfect for a short session, walker assault is pretty good and they're more game modes, most of them suck. But a campaign or a option to play with bots should be in the game!!"

    + (positive): + walker assault + graphics and sound + diverting action + new gun-play - (negative) : - no campaign - no bots - half of the game modes suck - these
    "Star Wars: Battlefront is perfect for a short session, walker assault is pretty good and they're more game modes, most of them suck. But a campaign or a option to play with bots should be in the game!!"

    + (positive):
    + walker assault
    + graphics and sound
    + diverting action
    + new gun-play

    - (negative) :
    - no campaign
    - no bots
    - half of the game modes suck
    - these singleplayer missions

    GENRE RATING: 6.0
    OVERALL RATING: 4.4
    Expand
  87. Feb 14, 2016
    1
    In my opinion, this game needs another year or two of development, maybe when Episode 8 releases it'll be ready for primetime...? Standard battlefield games bring more to the table at release than this pile of garbage. Buy it, play for a few hours then request your refund, that's about all it's worth.
  88. Feb 13, 2016
    4
    I want to like this game. It is by far the best looking Star Wars game I have ever seen and there is so much potential. I think the only reason this game has not gone the way of Titanfall is only because it is a Star Wars game. If DICE doesn't add a lot of new content soon for cheap the playerbase will move on.

    Battlefront has a very shallow progression system. After a few hours of play
    I want to like this game. It is by far the best looking Star Wars game I have ever seen and there is so much potential. I think the only reason this game has not gone the way of Titanfall is only because it is a Star Wars game. If DICE doesn't add a lot of new content soon for cheap the playerbase will move on.

    Battlefront has a very shallow progression system. After a few hours of play all the weapons are unlocked and they have no upgrades. After a few more hours all the perks and powers are unlocked with the important ones upgraded to tier 2 which is maxed out. After that the only thing to earn experience and credits for is cosmetic changes. And now everyone is a shadow trooper or alien.

    The are 11 total primary weapons. At least five there is almost no point in using because another similar weapon is better in all respects.

    The rebels have no land vehicles at all. Imperials have the AT-ST which is easily killed since anyone can carry quick locking homing anti-vehicle weapons. Heck, even the sniper rifle does significant damage to the AT-ST. I do not count speeders since they are only on Endor and its hard to impact the battle when you spend most of the time avoiding obstacles.

    There is effectively no matchmaking system. I have seen far more one-sided fights than close finishes.

    Air vehicles sometimes make a rare contribution to the fight, but often times they just fly around the battlefield avoiding those homing missiles or fighting each other.

    The game types are just pathetic. There are a bunch of modes that almost no one plays, like capture the droid/flag or control points. The only new gameplay type is Walker Assault. Imperials have to protect an AT-AT, rebels kill it. That is the only new innovative mode.

    I keep trying to play this game, but I can only do an hour or so before I want to play something else.
    Expand
  89. Feb 10, 2016
    10
    Everyone saying "this game is crap and don't have single player campaign!", but...when Battlefront series have a campaign in the past (at least a good one)? That's right...
    I bought this game few weeks ago and i didn't expected that this game will be so much fun!
  90. Feb 10, 2016
    3
    Dieses Spiel ist leider nur schlecht. Konzeptuell nicht durchdacht, wenig Auswahl und selbst das arcadige Spieldesign wurde verfehlt, Man hat kein Interesse das Spiel länger als wenige Stunden zu spielen. Instant-tode, bugs und langweilge Modes ergeben insgesamt eine furchtbare Umsetzung. Schade EA / DICE
  91. Feb 5, 2016
    0
    I still cant believe what happend. Out there is a nearly perfect Game with nearly the same Name, and they failed to make a good one?
    I mean the only thing they had to do, would have been taking Battlefront 1 or 2 and just smahs their Engine on ot and thats it. But the funny thing is that exactly a Game like Battlefront EA ( It is not nearly worth the Battlefront Name) shows us how
    I still cant believe what happend. Out there is a nearly perfect Game with nearly the same Name, and they failed to make a good one?
    I mean the only thing they had to do, would have been taking Battlefront 1 or 2 and just smahs their Engine on ot and thats it. But the funny thing is that exactly a Game like Battlefront EA ( It is not nearly worth the Battlefront Name) shows us how Publisher and Producers are looking down at us. The fact that they really thought that just good Graphics and nice sound is all we need.

    The Game is way to easy, it is repetitive (only 4-6 maps, and not even for every Gamemode).
    My experience so far was playing the Beta, being bored after 3-4 hours. Actually thinking they will add severel things at launch, and 20 hours after launch getting refunds.

    Instead of making Space battles or even the fact that whole two factions are missing their work power
    focused on the Diarama Mode or the very boring survival Coop Mode. (With an god awful AI. Try standing on an AT-ST and your are safe.)

    I cant belive there are people defending this garbage of a Game. Out there are hundreds of way better Games for less. And that EA STILL hasnt learned from Games like NFS, Battlefield or Titanfall (yeah still exists) just shows us that they really dont care and just throw one dissapointing Game after another at us.
    And people still pre-order and buy that stuff.

    Well DICE. Learn from that please. Good Graphics and nostalgic Moments arent enough for a good Game.
    Expand
  92. Feb 5, 2016
    3
    con títulos como este nos damos cuenta del el pedazo de mierda que es como empresa electronic arts y todos sus derivados. un claro ejemplo de lo que se puede considerar como un acto en pro del dinero fácil, aprovechadoce de las festividades y el estreno de la nueva película de star wars. mi review se resume en lo siguiente, un titulo bonito gráficamente y espectacular en lo sonoro, escon títulos como este nos damos cuenta del el pedazo de mierda que es como empresa electronic arts y todos sus derivados. un claro ejemplo de lo que se puede considerar como un acto en pro del dinero fácil, aprovechadoce de las festividades y el estreno de la nueva película de star wars. mi review se resume en lo siguiente, un titulo bonito gráficamente y espectacular en lo sonoro, es curioso como es que estos dos factores anteriores son lo único destacables en este molesto juego. ahora voy por lo malo, el juegos se disfruta a plenidad las primeras 4 horas, las cuales son mas que suficientes para probar todo lo que ofrece, es terrible en lo que respecta a la jugabilidad a menudo le disparas a las rocas cuando andas en 3ra persona, el juego es tedioso al no ofrecer nada mas allá de sus escasas armas y armaduras y un sistema de progresión bastante incompleto se pierde fácilmente el enganche con el titulo. decepcionante. Expand
  93. Feb 1, 2016
    1
    Would be better if you could find a match. My usual routine is try one of the interesting game modes, try find a game for about 20 minutes, give up and play Blast, get bored after 15 minutes. Not enough stuff to unlock. Looks great but these days I'd rather play a game made of pixel art that has good reliable gameplay. So Battlefront gets 1 star.
  94. Jan 29, 2016
    2
    Graphics - 10/10
    Soundtrack and FX 10/10
    Optimization 10/10 Mechanics = Okay. 7/10 Gameplay = Poor. Way bellow average. 1/10 Why? You can't find a game. The matching system is not subpar, its horrendous, inefficient. Its just unacceptable such a system on a game that relies so much on online matches. There is no server browser, and we PC players are stuck to a console-like auto
    Graphics - 10/10
    Soundtrack and FX 10/10
    Optimization 10/10

    Mechanics = Okay. 7/10
    Gameplay = Poor. Way bellow average. 1/10

    Why? You can't find a game. The matching system is not subpar, its horrendous, inefficient. Its just unacceptable such a system on a game that relies so much on online matches. There is no server browser, and we PC players are stuck to a console-like auto matching that not only takes away our freedom but is also further hindered by the excessive minimum player number requirements for each map. So if you are ever matched, you'll have to wait forever because the game can't allow players to play a 12 player max map with 6 players, or even put bots so players can wait playing the actual game.

    Private matches have been added recently, but you don't earn points from them. Great, useless for those who are still leveling and getting new stuff.

    Server browser seems to be forbidden by EA for some odd reason.

    Game is also overpriced, and price doesn't justify the content AT ALL. Overall gameplay meta is oversimplified. Makes the game "cod-like", gun and run. Yes the game does offer strategic moments, but those are fews and in-between all the mindless running and gunning.

    Such a waste dev rights were given to EA. I'm sure Devs themselves worked hard, but the publisher screwed up all the potential. To be honest, If they remade battlefront 2 with updated online, I'd be way happier.
    Expand
  95. Jan 28, 2016
    6
    Nov 26, 2015
    Updated...
    After 60 hour of gameplay and suprisingly I am still having fun... yes the maps are a few but the different game modes makes it better. So I changed the score from 6 to 7. I "accepted" that this is not a battlefield style of game and the only thing that still bothers me is the few map and and the "explosive spam" gameplay. Update2: Back to 6 the shine weared off
    Nov 26, 2015
    Updated...
    After 60 hour of gameplay and suprisingly I am still having fun... yes the maps are a few but the different game modes makes it better. So I changed the score from 6 to 7. I "accepted" that this is not a battlefield style of game and the only thing that still bothers me is the few map and and the "explosive spam" gameplay.
    Update2:
    Back to 6 the shine weared off ehh :/
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Original review:

    Being a fan of the original Star Wars trilogy so I can say that I think this game is a true Star Wars experience!

    I have played 5 hour in the beta and had fun but it was too repetitive on the same map and game mode after a while so I waited the final release to judge... now I have played 7 hour straight since the release.

    The pros:

    +The visual and the audio is the best I have seen in a multiplayer FPS and the performance is OK(50-60fps) on high settings with my AMD FX 8350 and R9 280 (and Xonar DSX ,5.1 speaker set) setup.

    +Shooting with a blaster is very satisfying , the vehicle play is fun and the card system is interesting.

    +Playing with a hero is EPIC! or Spawning as the Emperor's Bodyguard is a blast :)

    +Map Design

    +Fighter Squadron Game mode!

    This game mode is like a different game where you fight air battles on a planet surface with X-wing, Tie Fighter, A-Wing, and Tie Interceptor beside the two hero ships (Boba Fett and Han Solo). It would be perfect and Epic if there would be space battles with Capital Ships take part in and not just as visual background with more type of ships like B-wing, Tie Bomber etc. And 20v20 instead of 10v10 with bots. I hope and wish that they will improve this game mode because this game mode has a huge potential to be much better.

    The Cons:

    - Lack of "meaningful" customisation. 90% of this are different heads with different hair styles and there are only a few(2 on empire side) different model at lvl40,50.

    I hate to see a stormtrooper without a helmet....... so unrealistic and it destroys the immersion....

    -There is no weapon customisation like in other Battlefield games. ( maybe this is due to the lore)

    -The lack of the tools and map design(map with markers, party chat,etc.) to make teamplay possible with the "random" spawn locations.

    There are no squads nor tools to coordinate what to do where to go (ofc the objectives/point of interest are less than before in other battlefield titles) but at least a 4 men squad play would have been nice instead of this buddy system limited to 2 player. Everyone is like headless chickens running around the battlefield on their own. (Sometimes it feels like playing against bots spawning randomly everywhere)

    - Its not a big minus but the consumable vehicle tokens .... (I see that I think they have tried to designed the battle like it was in progression already when we jump in)

    -"Over the top" casual friendly focused on solo experience...

    I have no problem with casual games but I feel the game suffers from that everything is so streamlined that the gameplay became very flat without much depth. Maybe Dice didn't want to create a game what feels as a reskin of battlefield but instead of new interesting design or innovations to the genre they get rid of everything special about their battlefield series and created a streamline cinematic star wars experience what it becomes repetitive very fast if someone is trying to play this as a battlefield game and not as some casual game 1-2 hour a day (with the vanilla content).

    Not to mention the weapon and grenade cards with cooldown... at least the grenades should be limited or have a lot longer cooldown . :/

    -Content.

    I think there should be lot more character customisation option and not just different heads/hairstyles especially for STORM TROOPERS!

    I think the four different map type is not enough to justify the full AAA++ price tag and I am afraid that the game is planned to be built for expansion so thats why they cut out things. So I guess we will see the cool customisation options added for extra in hand with the different maps and maybe game modes. If you like to play just 1-2 game mode than you are stuck with the same few map. I hope that there is a lot of cool things in Dice's pockets hidden (because of "financial" reasons forced by EA) and there will be much more depth when they will finally pull these things out and add it to the game as expansions that supposed to be in he base game in the first place. It would be disusting to see the same game sold as battlefront 2 , 3, 4 for full price with some new feature added when this game could be much more. All in all I think the game is great if you plan to play it casually and its obviously not meant to be played HC but we will have to pay a lot of money for all the DLC and wait a year if we want to get the "full game".
    Expand
  96. Jan 25, 2016
    0
    Multiplayer is a complete mess. More often than not I quit because finding a match in Australia is almost impossible. What a waste of money on my part, and a wasted opportunity for EA and DICE. In one word it's PATHETIC.
  97. Jan 25, 2016
    3
    What? THAT'S IT!? Batlefront 2 had space battles and the Clone Wars and oh yeah, a single player mode. This game just reaks of EA. I knew this game was going to be bad, so I'm not really that surprised.

    But credits due were credits due. The graphics are great. I will admit that... but oh wait, graphics don't matter to me. No pity points from me!
  98. Jan 24, 2016
    1
    the Matchmaking is horrible , the game has little content and the price is the same whether large securities with much higher amount of content, after a while it becomes boring .
  99. Jan 23, 2016
    0
    Prinzipiell kein schlechtes Spiel aber,

    1. Mangelnde Abwechslung 2. Überteuerte DLC´s 3. Stormtroopler ohne Helm was viel vom Star Wars Feeling zerstört 4. Der Nahkampf zwischen Luke und Vader ist für´n arsch da derjenige gewinnt der den ersten Schlag macht und den Gegner damit stunt 5. Thermal Imploder gehen durch Wände durch z.B in Basen des Imperiums merkt man dass 6.
    Prinzipiell kein schlechtes Spiel aber,

    1. Mangelnde Abwechslung
    2. Überteuerte DLC´s
    3. Stormtroopler ohne Helm was viel vom Star Wars Feeling zerstört
    4. Der Nahkampf zwischen Luke und Vader ist für´n arsch da derjenige gewinnt der den ersten Schlag macht und den Gegner damit stunt
    5. Thermal Imploder gehen durch Wände durch z.B in Basen des Imperiums merkt man dass
    6. Armbrust Jetpack Leute
    7. Das Fliegen ist mit Maus und Tastatur nicht spielbar da man keine Kontrolle über den X-Wing,...
    8. Die im Verhältnis zu den anderen Waffen viel zu OPe DL-44
    9. Man kann mit Boba nicht ranzoomen was an den Konsolen jedoch möglich ist
    10. Die Server kacken regelmäßig ab
    11. Der Zielschuss sollte entfernt werden da er einfach nur nervt
    12. Droiden und Infanteriegeschütze sind stark
    13. Sniper die dich vom anderen Ende der Map töten und auf dem Monitor nur zwei Pixel groß sind
    14. Wenn man beim Training die Mission macht wo man die AT-AT´s mit T-47 Luftspeedern ausschalten soll und diese im ko-op spielt treten jede menge Bugs auf wie dass man ineinander spawnt oder wenn man gleichzeitig ein AT-AT mit Kabeln umfliegt und der eine ihn zu Fall bringt stirbt der zweite der noch um ihn rumfliegt automatisch
    15. Die Hitboxen von "Flugzeugen" sind nicht nachvollziehbar wenn man nah über dem Boden fliegt zerschmettert man obwohl man noch 10m hoch über dem Boden ist
    16. Rebellen sind auf den Endormaps viel zu gut getarnt während die Stormtooper als Schneemänner rumlaufen
    17. Zu wenige Maps
    18. Keine Weltraumschlachten
    19. Der Imperator sollte gegen normale Truppen stärker gemacht werden
    20. Die Ehrengarde von Leia ist zu stark und sollte der von Palpatin angepasst werden bzw. währe es noch besser wenn Palpatin die roten Wächter aus dem Senat hätte
    21. Die Blendgranaten sind gegen Helden zu op, Helden sollten nur kürzer geblendet werden
    22. Kein richtiger Singelplayer
    Expand
  100. Jan 23, 2016
    6
    First of all this is a game for star wars fans, and it capture the feel of the movies really well.
    When we come to game play it is not bad at all. The controls are good but some people say that it is too simple, but for me as a casual fps player I find them pretty satisfying.
    But the game BIG FAIL is the lack of SINGLE PLAYER mode which is really important for a star wars game.
Metascore
72

Mixed or average reviews - based on 19 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 8 out of 19
  2. Negative: 0 out of 19
  1. CD-Action
    Feb 4, 2016
    75
    A perfect game for short sessions. It’s not deep enough to convince online shooters veterans, but it will definitely win over Star Wars fans. [01/2016, p.34]
  2. Pelit (Finland)
    Jan 4, 2016
    81
    Star Wars Battlefront looks and sounds great, and with Battlefield-class gameplay could have ruled the multiplayer galaxy. Unfortunately, at best OK-level, Battlefront-class gameplay is much too shallow to last long. And this is THE one license, which really needs a single player campaign. [Dec 2015]
  3. Edge Magazine
    Jan 3, 2016
    70
    Any semblance of subtlety is abandoned entirely when it comes to the playable Hero and Villain characters. [Jan 2016, p.110]