Immortals of Aveum

 PC
User Score
3.4

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 51 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 14 out of 51
  2. Mixed: 3 out of 51
  3. Negative: 34 out of 51

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. PenetratorGod
    Aug 25, 2023
    0
    Just because you're developing the game with Unreal Engine 5 doesn't mean you can't optimize it. They will probably use this as a new excuse. It's funny that with these ridiculous system requirements you expect the game to sell and play successfully on PC. I'm so tired of AAA game developers who don't care about system requirements and optimization anymore. I won't buy a higher system justJust because you're developing the game with Unreal Engine 5 doesn't mean you can't optimize it. They will probably use this as a new excuse. It's funny that with these ridiculous system requirements you expect the game to sell and play successfully on PC. I'm so tired of AAA game developers who don't care about system requirements and optimization anymore. I won't buy a higher system just because you and your ridiculous game want me to. If you want to get gamers to buy a good system, first learn how to make good game.… Expand
  2. Greenhouse
    Aug 29, 2023
    1
    Absolutely abysmal performance, can't keep constant frames on a 3070, which makes the PC sound like a jet taking off, all while looking extremely average. Which for some reason is blamed on Unreal Engine 5, when only the developers or publishers are to blame for not properly optimizing their game, and instead try to rely again on DLSS to make the game decently playable, while insteadAbsolutely abysmal performance, can't keep constant frames on a 3070, which makes the PC sound like a jet taking off, all while looking extremely average. Which for some reason is blamed on Unreal Engine 5, when only the developers or publishers are to blame for not properly optimizing their game, and instead try to rely again on DLSS to make the game decently playable, while instead somehow failing to do so.
    The story is also below average, the gameplay is repetitive and monotonous, and is another victim of the sudden need to add 2000 particles everywhere.

    In short, don't bother playing this game. Or wait for a massive sale and lower your expectations down to the ground.    … Expand
  3. Shinrei
    Sep 1, 2023
    0
    **** game that **** developer.
    No optimization, dumb gameplay, crap game design.
  4. boku_no_pichu
    Sep 1, 2023
    0
    Disgusting optimization
    Instead of magic in fact guns with recoil
    Dialogues like from twitter in a fantasy world
    A mess of effects on the screen
    At the end of the game there is a terrible balance, no matter how you pump and no matter what loot you find, the further along the game, the weaker you are
  5. raysuki
    Aug 29, 2023
    1
    Well it's not a good game ... so for those who can't run it you're not missing much
  6. StormDeath69
    Aug 26, 2023
    0
    Attendez la 5090 pour y jouer à 60 FPS.
    Ils n'ont même plus besoin d'optimiser leur jeu il se repose sur le DLSS, FSR, XESS.
    La plupart des jeux sous EU5 seront injouables ce moteur demande encore plus d'optimisation que le précédent.
    Virer Denuvo et le lancer EA et ça ira mieux vous verrez.
  7. MoStafaHaNy90
    Aug 29, 2023
    0
    Trash Game With a poor optimization and weak story and I can't believe that developers are asking for $70 for this game
  8. aven59
    Aug 26, 2023
    0
    Trop de défauts pour l'instant: problèmes avec DLSS 3.0 Nvidia, on ne peut pas passer les cinématiques, l'écran est fouillis lors des combats, parfois les décors manquent de netteté, etc...
  9. helladarionx
    Aug 27, 2023
    0
    A mesma lacração nojenta e asquerosa de sempre. feminismo e lacração a cada 10 segundos. insuportavel isso, esgoto puro
  10. winzentween
    Aug 27, 2023
    4
    What happened to this game? It had real promise and shines now and again but for much of this game you'll be doing rinse and repeat first person shooter generic shooting but with your arm. On pc the graphics look good but the fps really tank even on a decent system . There is a story but it's pretty bad and the long cut scenes don't help. Overall it's nothing new or special and hasWhat happened to this game? It had real promise and shines now and again but for much of this game you'll be doing rinse and repeat first person shooter generic shooting but with your arm. On pc the graphics look good but the fps really tank even on a decent system . There is a story but it's pretty bad and the long cut scenes don't help. Overall it's nothing new or special and has some iffy business practices. Wait for free or a sale.… Expand
  11. SilverOrlov
    Sep 2, 2023
    2
    No, that's enough. I'm tired of giving any even single concession to those who constantly litter the gaming industry with frankly broken garbage, self-righteously calling them "games", and believing that on the other side of the screen there are only idiots who will "eat" that time after time, again and again. No, of course there will be some such people... but most, fortunately, know howNo, that's enough. I'm tired of giving any even single concession to those who constantly litter the gaming industry with frankly broken garbage, self-righteously calling them "games", and believing that on the other side of the screen there are only idiots who will "eat" that time after time, again and again. No, of course there will be some such people... but most, fortunately, know how to distinguish high-quality from low-quality.
    With the exception of the more or less well-drawn surrounding World, everything else here is done horribly. Even this surrounding world, although nice, looks plastic and sterile. Okay, one could also say that there was some well-executed cut-scenes and a potentially interesting idea for the overall plot/story of the game. But this plot potential was drained down and the product had only one plus at the end - the above-mentioned stage direction of cut-scenes. That's All.
    I don’t even think we need to talk about optimization, do we? ...It simply doesn't exist. Asking such a high requirements from gamer's computer, I would say that it is even negative optimization, and not simply absent of it.
    That's it... that's enough. If these unfortunate so-called "game makers" won't start making *drum roll* GAMES! I will not give any discounts them like “well, maybe this thing deserves one more point, or that one deserves half a point.” and will give to every subsequent product like this one no more than 1-2 points in rating. To hell that pseudo-games.    … Expand
  12. SirInkompetenz
    Sep 4, 2023
    2
    Game has average graphics at most, not as advertised in the trailers. Falsely advertised as magic COD. It's more like a bad adventure game, with even worse dialogue.
  13. StanBlack
    Sep 1, 2023
    0
    briefly: diversity fancy shEEt pile. don't ever think to buy this 'something'.
  14. minoudeghi1995
    Sep 7, 2023
    0
    trash game with poor optimization and a weak story. The reviewer expresses disbelief at the developers asking for $70 for this game.

    Firstof all, this game is an absolute disappointment in terms of optimization. It runs poorly even on high-end machines, with constant lag and frame drops. It's frustrating to invest in a game that doesn't even run smoothly. Secondly, thestoryline of this    trash game with poor optimization and a weak story. The reviewer expresses disbelief at the developers asking for $70 for this game.

    Firstof all, this game is an absolute disappointment in terms of optimization. It runs poorly even on high-end machines, with constant lag and frame drops. It's frustrating to invest in a game that doesn't even run smoothly. Secondly, thestoryline of this game is incredibly weak. It lacks depth, character development, and fails to captivate the player's interest. The plot feels rushed and inconsistent, leaving players feeling unsatisfied and unengaged.

    Furthermore, the audacity of the developers to ask for $70 for this game is mind-boggling. Given its subpar optimization and lackluster story, it is difficult to understand why they would set such a steep price. It feels like a blatant attempt to exploit gamers and take advantage of their hard-earned money.

    In conclusion, this game falls short in multiple aspects. Its poor optimization and weak storyline make it a frustrating and unenjoyable experience. Considering the developers' unreasonable asking price, it is clear that there are much better gaming options available for a more reasonable cost.    … Expand

Awards & Rankings

46
#46 Most Discussed PC Game of 2023

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
65

Mixed or average reviews - based on 16 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 16
  2. Mixed: 10 out of 16
  3. Negative: 1 out of 16
  1. GameMAG
    Feb 23, 2024
    60
    Even six months after release, Immortals of Aveum is in dire need of more polish and a whole bunch of new patches.
    Read full review
  2. GameGrin
    Dec 14, 2023
    85
    Immortals of Aveum’s greatest flaw is missing the target in marketing. It may not be the best FPS adventure, but it has a very enjoyable narrative and great (albeit few) full-fledged spell-flinging fights that I couldn’t get enough of.
    Read full review
  3. Hooked Gamers
    Sep 11, 2023
    20
    It is a failure, plain and simple. While there is still hope that it can be salvaged, with time, that's no excuse for a launch like this. One can usually forgive a bad launch. However, it is far more difficult to forgive an unplayable launch...
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »