- Publisher: Blizzard Entertainment
- Release Date: Mar 25, 2014
User Score
Mixed or average reviews- based on 1744 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 988 out of 1744
-
Mixed: 316 out of 1744
-
Negative: 440 out of 1744
Buy Now
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
Oct 2, 2014
-
Sep 8, 2022
-
Apr 12, 2014
-
Mar 27, 201440 bucks for the added amount of content is a joke.
People dont get fooled by blizzard again, its a disguised, very expensive dlc, no need to waste so much money on something this shallow! -
Mar 28, 2014What a cash grab game. I honestly don't understand why they removed all character skill building aspects of the game.
Everyone uses the same skills. All the items look the same. Content in the game is extremely repetitive.
Who would play this game when you have so many SO MANY ARPGS to pick from right now. -
Mar 27, 201440$ DLC for the biggest fail ever made, Diablo 3. I cant come up with a single thing in this game that is good. Bad story, bad voice acting, bad graphics, bad map design, cinematic looks good but story in it is bad (Dragon Ball Z), bad gameplay. This game is made for children. Do not buy if you are older than 12.
-
Mar 27, 2014
-
Jun 29, 2014Ridiculously poor value as a paid-for expansion. More of the same, and little of it.
Paying an extra $40 for them to fix stuff they should have done previously is ridiculous. -
Apr 2, 2014Look at all those 10s... its probably a joke considering that the $40 price tag for a so called "expansion" with the content that matches of DLC packs for a game that had many basic features stripped naked of its base game so blizzard could make an extra buck now... not to mention that the game is still missing several key contents requested by its community...
-
Jun 4, 2014I don't know what I was expecting when I brought this, don't waste your money . First the story was a huge disappointment specially after the stupid main one, a lot of the changes were probably initially in the main version, then taken out to sell this **** The skill system is still boring and simple. Don't waste your time.
-
Mar 29, 2014
-
Mar 25, 2014
-
Mar 29, 2014
-
Apr 9, 2014Embarrassing. Really embarrassing. This was supposed to be a free patch, a thank you to those who have thrown their money to the publication of poor Diablo 3. Instead they ask for another 30 Euro. 30 euro for a patch. To which are added the 50 already spent. Total: 80€ to play, after two years, a decent version of the game! Never again Blizzard!!!
-
Jan 17, 2016Waiting queues for a bad solo gaming expierence, good get a 0. still no skill selections, auto leveling, auto adapting monsters to your level wherever you are,no random maps and so on
-
May 15, 2014
-
Apr 27, 2014If Diablo 3 was horrible, this is totally worst... Blizzard only desires the money and lacks the game quality...
Why Blizzard? Why? I just wanna a game like Diablo 2 , or Warcraft 3, a quality game and not a **** game. -
Apr 17, 2014They released an expansion to fix all the mistakes they made with the first game? Why should we pay for them to fix their game? Oh and there is also a new act and a class...I do not know anymore Blizzard...your losing my interest.
-
Jun 8, 2014
-
Mar 26, 2014its a same boring casual diablo 3. minimum changes 40 euro for this not a option. I never forgive launch diablo3 faill. Blizard become suck
-
Apr 3, 2014Reaper of Souls should have been free. A fifth Act plus a new class doesn't justify the $40 price tag. This expansion largely serves to correct the massive flaw of the core game.
-
Sep 14, 2014
-
Mar 27, 2014This game was extremely short for the overinflated asking price. It looked the same as it's parent game, and played pretty much the same as well. When I finished the expansion, I was in total disbelief that I spent $40 on what amounts to less than two hours of content. Unacceptable.
-
Mar 27, 2014This game is nothing but pure steaming pile of horse **** made by blizzard to make more money on stupid players who bought it and think they will fix broken game in expansion.
play path of exile or solitaire. I don't care, I am going to install Diablo 2 again. -
Apr 2, 2014
-
Apr 8, 2014Money grabbing dump. ridiculous for a DLC more expensive than the original one. This was one of my most anticipate franchises, but I still remember how shabby Diablo III is. I will never try any sequels.
There are some much better alternatives for this genre, like Torchlight II, Path of Exile. -
Mar 25, 2014
-
Mar 25, 2014This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Mar 31, 2014Yet another Blizzard game that is fun for the first 3 hours then it's the most repetitive game you've ever played.
ARPGs are meant for long term play, D2 and PoE are prime examples of great longevity - D3 nor D3 RoS provide ANY longevity AT ALL. They are ruining the genre and everyone should issue a refund. -
Mar 25, 2014
Awards & Rankings
-
CD-ActionJun 28, 2014At last! Diablo III became the game I was looking forward to. Reaper of Souls does more than just improve the original – it reinvents it and helps it reclaim the hack’n’slash throne. [05/2014, p.50]
-
LEVEL (Czech Republic)May 16, 2014Heaps of new content provides hours of fun, even though the campaign could use a little extension. But if you’re a fan, this is a must. [Issue#241]
-
May 14, 2014Blizzard did the obvious: literally transformed Diablo 3 to what it should have been from the start. It took them some time, but finally Blizzard got the message and moved finally to the right direction. While we expect the next expansion, fans of action / rpg can now sleep peacefully ... the king is here!