Battlefield V

 PC
User Score
3.0

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 3148 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 674 out of 3148
  2. Mixed: 296 out of 3148
  3. Negative: 2,178 out of 3148
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. CheckGamesList
    Sep 21, 2019
    10
    Gorgeous, expansive, realistic (or at least as much as an FPS can be), and simply loaded to the brim with content — in short, every bit as good as its predecessors. I don't mind the minor anachronisms (although I'm surprised that my fellow gamer Millennials cared about historical precision this much).
  2. djlefevre
    Jun 22, 2020
    10
    It got a bit of flack but it’s a solid game. Not perfect but definitely fun to play.
  3. Werebear
    Jun 18, 2020
    0
    WW2 without USSR - you are **** fascists.
    I hope you become lampshades.......................................................................................................................................
  4. Mahdiar
    Feb 25, 2020
    8
    Gameplay : 8
    Graphics : 8
    Story : 6
    Sound : 8
    **********************************************************************************
    Overall : 8
  5. Tomle1202
    Aug 26, 2021
    6
    The lack of innovation and polish hurts more than it should, because ultimately Battlefield V is not a bad game, just not a great one either. Also, extremely poor anti-cheat.
  6. JeremiahJohnson
    Oct 23, 2021
    10
    I have more hours in this Battlefield than others so I guess that itself makes it a good game in my mind's eye. The division of tactical maps from strategic maps is imo the best part of BFV that separates it from previous games. Overall pretty much everything is done well. The downside to the game is the people who play it. You can make a great game but if it is played by low qualityI have more hours in this Battlefield than others so I guess that itself makes it a good game in my mind's eye. The division of tactical maps from strategic maps is imo the best part of BFV that separates it from previous games. Overall pretty much everything is done well. The downside to the game is the people who play it. You can make a great game but if it is played by low quality people then the game itself is going to be low quality. Thus a big part of the meta in BFV is playing the server shell game to find a match that isn't without point and purpose.… Expand
  7. SuperkenGaming
    May 10, 2021
    8
    Battlefield 5
    a great attention to detail
    I was hooked on battlefield 1 5 years ago, so I of course had to check out battlefield 5 and watch them hopefully execute further on their war stories single player campaign.. this time around I didn’t care much for the multiplayer… I don’t know if recent advancements have just made me less patient in the multiplayer world, but here in    Battlefield 5
    a great attention to detail
    I was hooked on battlefield 1 5 years ago, so I of course had to check out battlefield 5 and watch them hopefully execute further on their war stories single player campaign..
    this time around I didn’t care much for the multiplayer… I don’t know if recent advancements have just made me less patient in the multiplayer world, but here in batt;efield 5 it feels like spawn die spawn die.. worse than recent call of dudtys.. but the time it takes to actually get back in the game makes battlefield 5 multiplayer from firestorm, to the modes youre used to just frustrating to play through for me… so I pushed that to the side and just focused on its 5 and a half hour long campaign..
    And thankfully the campaign here is beautiful.. so much attention to detail here… and a nice varity when it comes to the levels as you go across 5 different war stories… all with different languages.. so sadly if youre like me and hate subtitles.. you don’t relaly have a choice here if you want to know whats going on… I love that battlefield 5 at least tried to deliver a unique experience in each of the 5 stories.. but not nearly as much as battlefield 1… all 5 stories stuck out here.. but mostly for its setting aside for a snow level whee you get to travers with skiis, really having me wishing for a first person ssx game… but in terms of level design overall, all 5 chapters felt pretty identical, same objective, different location.. g oacross this open map, make stuff explode, rinse repeat with some cutscenes in between… I feel like dice needs to really take note from the call of duty team with their recent emphasis on variety throughout their campaigns… at times battlefield 5 does feel like its delivering mini first person shooter games inside one world… but most of the time, it all feels too familiar, having you wanting it to just be over alredy, rather thaan feeling like wow, what an amazing 5 stories like they did last time..
    Overall im kind of over battlefield multiplayer, but as far as its singplayer goes, I really hope dice hone in on this, and delivers us more fleshed out mini stories, that don’t feel so copy and paste when it comes to objectives and delivery. I feel like this could help with the constant immersion breaking return to combat area countdown . its fine every once in a while, but constantly being told to get back in a quote unquote open world setting, just shows a lack of care when it comes to designing your experience.. it feels like a bandaid forcing you to be in the spot the game wants you to be in, rather design doing its job of keeping you there.
    I havnt given up on this series yet, and at least for its war stories, Ill have a reason to keep coming back.
    I give Battlefield 5
    a 7.5/10    … Expand
  8. HappyPhilXD
    Nov 29, 2018
    5
    Es sieht aus und spielt sich mehr wie ein DLC des Vorgängers, Battlefield 1. Ein paar Mechaniken wurden abgeändert, die Waffen verhalten sich jetzt anders, der Sanitäter wurde überarbeitet. Ist jetzt nichts positives oder negatives.
    Die Auswahl der Spielmodi ist ok, leider fehlt mal wieder der Fanliebling Rush, dafür sind wieder die Großen Operationen verfügbar, welche ganz gut gelungen    Es sieht aus und spielt sich mehr wie ein DLC des Vorgängers, Battlefield 1. Ein paar Mechaniken wurden abgeändert, die Waffen verhalten sich jetzt anders, der Sanitäter wurde überarbeitet. Ist jetzt nichts positives oder negatives.
    Die Auswahl der Spielmodi ist ok, leider fehlt mal wieder der Fanliebling Rush, dafür sind wieder die Großen Operationen verfügbar, welche ganz gut gelungen sind. Aber im vergleich zum Vorgänger fühlen diese sich nicht mehr so gewaltig an.
    Der Singleplayer war dieses mal sehr langweilig. Die erste Story hätte lustig sein können, aber 15 Minuten durch eine fast leere Wüste zu laufen und 2 Bomben legen war nicht sehr interessant, die zweite Story ist absoluter Müll und wurde umgedichtet. Nicht mehr ein Squad an Elitesoldaten haben die Operation geführt, eine einzelne Frau soll es getan haben. Leider nicht sehr historisch korrekt. Da hätte ich mir eher eine Mission als russische Sniperfrau gewünscht, die gab es nämlich wirklich.
    Die dritte Mission war schön insziniert, ganz ok.

    Technisch... unter aller Sau. Ich bin kein Entwickler, aber wie bekommt man es hin, dass seit jahren die selbern Fehler in der Engine kreuchen und fleuchen? Netcode ist am Arsch, die Lauf- und Kletteranimationen sind seit Battlefield 1 extrem verbuggt, teleportieren, grundloses sterben und vieles mehr. Das ist kein Niveau für ein Multibilionen $ AAA Unternehmen.    … Expand
  9. maartendc
    Nov 27, 2018
    8
    Battlefield V is a good game, albeit a little dissapointing in some aspects.

    + The gameplay / gunplay is good and fun + The graphics are amazing + Sound is amazing + There are some good multiplayer maps, Hamada, Arras and Twisted Steel and fun times to be had. + They will add DLC content for free + No pay-to-win, only cosmetic items. + More squad-focused gameplay is good. + Some    Battlefield V is a good game, albeit a little dissapointing in some aspects.

    + The gameplay / gunplay is good and fun
    + The graphics are amazing
    + Sound is amazing
    + There are some good multiplayer maps, Hamada, Arras and Twisted Steel and fun times to be had.
    + They will add DLC content for free
    + No pay-to-win, only cosmetic items.
    + More squad-focused gameplay is good.
    + Some innovation with fortification building
    + The weapon specialization trees are actually a good way to customize the guns to your playstyle.

    - The content feels a bit light, with only 8 maps, and some short War Stories. Although they will add to the game later on for free.
    - A lot of the multiplayer maps are too infantry focused an miss that "Battlefield" feeling: Devastation, Rotterdam, Fjell, Narvik: All pretty small and vehicles don't play a significant role.
    - Lacks the iconic WW2 battles (Stalingrad, D-day, Operation Market Garden, Battle of the Bulge, Iwo Jima, etc.). Feels much less like WW2 than even the original BF1942.
    - The grand operations mode is disappointing: not as good as Operations in BF1
    - Chaotic interface with a lot of visual clutter
    - Too much cosmetic B/S for the guns etc.

    All in all I have had a lot of fun with this game so far, 20 hours in. But they will need to add some more content and maps soon, or it will start to feel old really quickly.    … Expand
  10. DesertDust
    Nov 16, 2019
    7
    I decided to try it out through the Origin Basic. It was my second Battlefield game from the series. Battlefield 1 was the first one and i played it a lot- really liked it.

    The first thing, that quite frustrated me, was time to kill, as someone in the previous reviews mentioned, you die, die and die, waiting for medic many times. In bad games it is really hard to focus, when you die so    I decided to try it out through the Origin Basic. It was my second Battlefield game from the series. Battlefield 1 was the first one and i played it a lot- really liked it.

    The first thing, that quite frustrated me, was time to kill, as someone in the previous reviews mentioned, you die, die and die, waiting for medic many times. In bad games it is really hard to focus, when you die so quickly. K/D ratio suffers. However, if you have a good team, which stick together and helps each other, this is not a big deal. But the word IF is a key here... you rarely get a good team. Many times people are camping with sniper rifles from the map corner, not willing to go into cap zone(not the developers fault, but it affects the pleasure from gameplay). And this is really frustrating. So - IF you have a good team, the low TTK will not bother you. If not - well. Prepare for frustration. I think, that time to kill is going to be changed again, but i may be mistaken.

    I like special abilities available for the squad commander. Very good idea. And if a player, which is a commander, doesn't give orders, it stops to be commander after some time. That was a good decision, because i hated that in Bf 1, where poor squad commander didn't give orders, and we were losing points.

    The second thing - sound. While the music is good(especially "under no flag" and "triumph". Both are awesome tracks) The sound is weird - it is often very hard to hear footsteps, and i hear tanks only, when they drive over me. It really doesn't help. You also don't feel the "might" of the weapon you are currently using. In BF 1 sounds of weapons were really awesome, here - they are not. It doesn't help the atmosphere.

    In BF1 we had one weapon Skin to choose. Now we can choose a skin for each weapon element. It wasn't necessary - it only makes menu harder to manage. Upgrading weapons, however, is nice.

    Building walls of sandbags and other entrenchments is a good fun. So is dragging stationary weapons by a truck or other vehicle.

    Finally some words about performance - driving vehicles is annoying. They block on each and every tree, rock, stone wall. Some are sliding. Sometimes game is changing into small slide show, where planes and soldiers disappear, only to appear in other place after a second or two later. And i had ping 20. When i first tried to complete Norway campaign, couldn't, due to a bug. ;)

    I wasn't happy about political correctness in the game or unhistorical elements. Others have written enough about it, i don't want to.

    Some good decisons, some bad.. I think 7 is a fair rating.
    Sorry for possible spelling/grammar mistakes.    … Expand
  11. Kamikazeshocki
    Jan 21, 2019
    9
    My god, for every EA game there are too many people who shouldn't be allowed to vote. Like in reality. I am no EA fan, but I played almost every Battlefield game and I have no Idea why the people don't like this. The teamplay is the best since, I don't know...This is better and more fun than BF1, in some regards even better than BF4 but the point is....I have to admit I like modern warfareMy god, for every EA game there are too many people who shouldn't be allowed to vote. Like in reality. I am no EA fan, but I played almost every Battlefield game and I have no Idea why the people don't like this. The teamplay is the best since, I don't know...This is better and more fun than BF1, in some regards even better than BF4 but the point is....I have to admit I like modern warfare stuff more than old war stuff. So nothing touches BF3 and 2 for me ever.
    So after 100 hours playing online without ever completing a single sp campaign (I wish they wiould stop creating single player for a multiplayer game, seriously!) I will make a pause now and wait for new maps and that battle royale mode in march. Glad I don't have to pay for a DLC this time.
    Though the graphic settings are pretty bugged for me (HDR fail and resolution bugs),
    this game looks still like the best I've seen up to date (thanx GTX 1080! => 1440p60p with HDR and settings on ultra). Glad I bought it for PC not PS4 pro this time.
    I only think there should've been 1-2 more maps for launch, or that Battleroyale mode....but hey...it comes in 2 months now.

    Let me do a summary for the whiners:
    - single player doesn't matter, never mattered once!
    - TTK whiner, get a life
    - historical accuracy, who cares this is a semi-arcade multiplayer shooter with just enough realisic elements to stay fun
    - if you hate EA this is no reason to hate a very good DICE game    … Expand
  12. lastsid
    Feb 12, 2020
    8
    Single palyer campaign was wierd and i dont like it. Going from overdramatic to overadventurous. Being anti-war and glorifiing it. It is a great specticle but it failed to be clever and bring some message. The only good story was the last one about german tank in Berlin in the end of war. It feels apocalyptic and characters was more interesting. Not a bland heroes of first 3 stories butSingle palyer campaign was wierd and i dont like it. Going from overdramatic to overadventurous. Being anti-war and glorifiing it. It is a great specticle but it failed to be clever and bring some message. The only good story was the last one about german tank in Berlin in the end of war. It feels apocalyptic and characters was more interesting. Not a bland heroes of first 3 stories but neither a vilains. Multiplayer is good but feels very similar to previous game. All new features feels like was added on top. And some of this features are irritating. They add animations to every move. You are in the plane. Press button to leave it and animation start play. And you leave the plane after 5 seconds where you are not where you planed to do that. Second big feature is building stuff, fortnite style.… Expand
  13. Lyvione
    Mar 5, 2021
    10
    This game for me is one of the best battlefields ive ever played. The negative review bombing afected the future development and i dont think that we will be seeing a red army update. As for the history - read books, there are tons of them- this is a videogame ispired by historical events not a ww2 documentary - and walking around with a chick medic is totaly my cup of tea.
  14. cem12
    Dec 10, 2018
    9
    Muy buen juego.
    Un contenido gráfico espectacular, muchas opciones de batalla.
    Pros: - Gráficos espectaculares. - Nuevo modo de construcción y defensa. - Buena recreación de escenarios y paisajes. - Juego estable. Negativo: - Fata de estandartes en los uniformes. - Falta de ambientación propagandística alemana. - Mujeres en la WW2 y asiáticas. - Falta de modo Fanático, imagino    Muy buen juego.
    Un contenido gráfico espectacular, muchas opciones de batalla.
    Pros:
    - Gráficos espectaculares.
    - Nuevo modo de construcción y defensa.
    - Buena recreación de escenarios y paisajes.
    - Juego estable.
    Negativo:
    - Fata de estandartes en los uniformes.
    - Falta de ambientación propagandística alemana.
    - Mujeres en la WW2 y asiáticas.
    - Falta de modo Fanático, imagino que saldrá más adelante.
    Hay detalles de este titulo que no honran a los soldados que dieron la vida en esa guerra. Falta de estandartes, mujeres en todos los ejércitos.
    Agrandes rasgos, es un buen juego y recomendable.    … Expand
  15. Alienwarez567
    Dec 12, 2018
    9
    I am one of the people who really enjoy the new BF 5, i dont really care about the politics of this game its a game get over it.

    Here are a list of things i love about it. Great maps Great graphics. Gunplay is awesome. No more spotting from 100 miles away. Tanks are not the allmighty no more grenade/mortar spam No more endless ammo. Better squad dynamics. Here are something    I am one of the people who really enjoy the new BF 5, i dont really care about the politics of this game its a game get over it.

    Here are a list of things i love about it.

    Great maps
    Great graphics.
    Gunplay is awesome.
    No more spotting from 100 miles away.
    Tanks are not the allmighty
    no more grenade/mortar spam
    No more endless ammo.
    Better squad dynamics.

    Here are something i hated about it.
    Bombers able to bomb spawn point right when match started (fixed)
    Certain weapons are a little too strong KE7 (fixed)
    Microtransactions are still in (but atleast its not pay 2 win)

    To me most of the reviews which are very low seem like people played the game for 20 mins and got steam rolled by a better team and just jumped on the bandwagon and whined about the game, which is fair enough.

    Best BF game since BF 3    … Expand
  16. AndersBjorkman
    Dec 9, 2018
    8
    Anders from Sweden here. History is one of my great interests in life, and has been since I was a child. The first and second world war has always been favorites of mine to study. When I heard about being able to play women or men of color in the Wehrmacht (german army) I was a little outraged. Now, after seeing how they've implemented it, I am not bothered. I just ignore it, they've doneAnders from Sweden here. History is one of my great interests in life, and has been since I was a child. The first and second world war has always been favorites of mine to study. When I heard about being able to play women or men of color in the Wehrmacht (german army) I was a little outraged. Now, after seeing how they've implemented it, I am not bothered. I just ignore it, they've done it discretely.
    The game itself feels like a classic battlefield. They've done some good adjustments from BF1 (I've played BF since the first when I was but a child), and I'm sure they will continually listen to feedback and do adjustments as deemed nesessary. The gameplay feels good, the graphics are great (running on a 1080gtx), the vehicles are spot on..

    As a battlefield fan and veteran, and lover of ww2 history, I give this game an 8/10. If you like BF and WW2, and have some money to spare, and an ok+ gaming pc, I'd give this a shot. If you have a **** computer, and don't have much money at the moment, I would recommend you pass (until the price drops in some months).

    Cheers /Anders    … Expand
  17. Plan3tX
    May 12, 2019
    4
    Battlefield V is an average game at best. After 6 months from release there is almost no new content apart from the things that should be in it at launch (BR, more weapons). It's buggy and apparently there is no anticheat because the game is full of obvious hackers and probably even more sneaky ones. Progression system is nonexistent, interface illegible, sound less beafy than in previousBattlefield V is an average game at best. After 6 months from release there is almost no new content apart from the things that should be in it at launch (BR, more weapons). It's buggy and apparently there is no anticheat because the game is full of obvious hackers and probably even more sneaky ones. Progression system is nonexistent, interface illegible, sound less beafy than in previous Battlefields and it certainly doesn't feel like a WWII game. It has, of course, it's good sides - graphics look very good, destruction system is on point and it runs smoothly. All in all it's a no-buy. If you never played BF franchise buy BF1 or BF4, if you play BF4/BF1 and think about BFV - just don't.… Expand
  18. YourPresident
    Nov 19, 2018
    5
    Battlefield 1 was a sort of a break. DICE said with it "guys, we need to think of the NEXT BIG THING so please play this ok-ish game meanwhile". So we played BF1 hoping for another BF3 or BFBC2. But we got this... Battlefield 1 with few added animations, modified settings and different weapons skins. Some people say "it's revolutionary! those, who say different - did not play the game".Battlefield 1 was a sort of a break. DICE said with it "guys, we need to think of the NEXT BIG THING so please play this ok-ish game meanwhile". So we played BF1 hoping for another BF3 or BFBC2. But we got this... Battlefield 1 with few added animations, modified settings and different weapons skins. Some people say "it's revolutionary! those, who say different - did not play the game". Well, I played a lot. I was trying to make myself like this game. But it is too plastic - there is no life in it. Single campaign is the worst I have seen in the last 3-4 years. Both the missions layout and graphics. Multiplayer - it throws everything it has in your screen and it looks like a packed to capacity kindergarten: everything moves and flies around and everything feels like a toy, like a machine gun on your tank that shoots circle shaped projectiles (like on 1st generation Nintendo) that can't get the plane that flies 5 mph. We see animations when you shoot a guy that his helmet flies off, but if you are shot at you don't have such thing, nothing. This game for me personally is an insult. I paid for their last games hoping not to get cheated. Instead - got cheated twice. DICE always were an example of great artisanship. Now it's just a printing press. I will rather play the new BlackOps… Expand
  19. ClausTheGamer
    Jan 18, 2019
    5
    Hanging on what Battlefield 1 accomplished, Battlefield V keeps most of the concepts of its previous game on its multiplayer lot and expands it just a little, and after playing it 15 hours, you might feel there's not much to do on it.

    Campaign: after one of the most epic prologues I've ever seen in a game, the rest of the campaign repeats the same level structure of each war story in    Hanging on what Battlefield 1 accomplished, Battlefield V keeps most of the concepts of its previous game on its multiplayer lot and expands it just a little, and after playing it 15 hours, you might feel there's not much to do on it.

    Campaign: after one of the most epic prologues I've ever seen in a game, the rest of the campaign repeats the same level structure of each war story in terms of the gameplay: cutscene-infiltration mission-another cutscene-another infiltration mission but less linear-cutscene. Besides of this, these war stories doesn't feel to have enough relation or repercussion on the WWII course, they feel like these stories only happened in that time lapse, but nothing to see in the war.

    Multiplayer: one of the most important progress this game made in comparison to Battlefield 1 is the weapon customization, because if in BF1 most of the weapons you could find were just variations of a single weapon and you weren't able to modify them, this time, the game allows you to actually change every benefit of them, from things that actually add these weapons an advantage for you once on the battlefield, to aesthetic aspects like their camouflage color. Leaving that aside, the rest of the multiplayer fails because of its current lack of playable content and its unbalanced matchmaking system. You might find every game mode really fun in the first hours, but the update plan its publisher took left a multiplayer focused game without enough necessary content to enjoy it after playing a few hours, without taking into account the fact that it doesn't have enough playable upgrades compared to its previous release.

    Grand-operations: once again, only a a few upgrades regarding the gameplay and the course of the operation you want to play, but, unlikeh the rest of the game, in this mode you actually feel you're playing a WWII-based game, but still the rest of the game should have done this given the way this game is sold.

    Conclusion: beside its stunning graphics and destruction engine, which actually had its previous release, Battlefield V does not feel like a WWII game, just as it lacks of enough enjoyable content on its multiplayer modes and, finally, puts on the table one of the most mediocre and less inspired campaigns in the Battlefield series. At this moment, I would not recommend this game with its current lack of content and taking into account we are barely on the first chapter of the update plan. Maybe the battle royale mode and the rest of the multiplayer content is yet to come to the game it could make it an enjoyable FPS game, but, just as it has been happening in the last two years, Electronic Arts lets us down once more.    … Expand
  20. keyserv
    Dec 17, 2018
    5
    It'd be a lot more fun if it wasn't full of annoying bugs, questionable design decisions, and a development team that doesn't seem to know what they're doing or what they want.

    I'll come back in a few months to check and see if it has improved, but I have looming doubts. This game was obviously released too early and could have used another 6 months, at least, in the "oven." If you    It'd be a lot more fun if it wasn't full of annoying bugs, questionable design decisions, and a development team that doesn't seem to know what they're doing or what they want.

    I'll come back in a few months to check and see if it has improved, but I have looming doubts. This game was obviously released too early and could have used another 6 months, at least, in the "oven."

    If you need a Battlefield fix, stick with a good one like BF3 or 4, or even BF1. They are far superior games at this point.    … Expand
  21. xZerokelvinx
    Nov 17, 2018
    5
    Clearly a ton of work has gone into the game itself. Albeit buggy at times during multiplayer, the game plays similar to Battlefield 1, with a few FPS drops during online play. The main issue that the game runs into is that it feels obviously rushed out. A lot of the interactive mechanics specifically need some polishing to smoothen out gameplay, the "incentive for teamwork" feels almostClearly a ton of work has gone into the game itself. Albeit buggy at times during multiplayer, the game plays similar to Battlefield 1, with a few FPS drops during online play. The main issue that the game runs into is that it feels obviously rushed out. A lot of the interactive mechanics specifically need some polishing to smoothen out gameplay, the "incentive for teamwork" feels almost always punitive, and the balance between classes seem to be lacking.

    Some positives about the game: The graphics are pretty much just BF1 with a few more textures, the animations that are not buggy look beautiful, online progression is at a good pace, and the game as a whole seems to be a bit more immersive than the previous iterations.

    Recommendations: If you are looking for a new BF game, this will fulfill that desire. It is definitely more team based, so try to get a party to play with. Personally, I would wait until updates are made that would make the game play a little better.

    Overall: 5/10. The game is buggy but fun. Once the bugs are fixed, I will update the rating accordingly. It feels like a twin to BF1, with some upgrades at the expense of some glitches. It is as fun as BF1 in my opinion, but I am hoping for more with the upcoming updates.    … Expand
  22. Dagger95
    Nov 25, 2018
    7
    Le campagne sono carine e danno un bel senso di libertà, ovviamente il comparto tecnico è mostruoso anche se avendolo giocato prima del lancio ho riscontrato diversi bug fastidiosi ed in alcuni casi invalidanti. Ottimo togliere il premium dal gioco, FINALMENTE. Non è un gioco che si può considerare storico e punta sul divertimento, quindi non vi aspettate molto da questo punto di vista. IlLe campagne sono carine e danno un bel senso di libertà, ovviamente il comparto tecnico è mostruoso anche se avendolo giocato prima del lancio ho riscontrato diversi bug fastidiosi ed in alcuni casi invalidanti. Ottimo togliere il premium dal gioco, FINALMENTE. Non è un gioco che si può considerare storico e punta sul divertimento, quindi non vi aspettate molto da questo punto di vista. Il multiplayer è bello anche se a volte i server laggano. Mi è piaciuta la classe del cecchino che ora è più un supporto per individuare nemici, in questo capitolo non troveremo quindi metà giocatori a fare i cecchini visto che questa classe ha più una funzione di spotting, tutto sommato direi che è un buon gioco anche se avrei garbato un sacco più campagne al lancio (almeno il doppio) che sono veramente belle.… Expand
  23. esillen
    Dec 10, 2018
    10
    I am a huge fan of the series and I've played since bf1942. I just have to say that this is the best one, even better than bfbc2 and that is to say a lot!
    This game has received a lot of unwarranted hate and I believe most 0s come from people who never actually played the game.
    I enjoy the hell out of this game!
  24. ShadyMa
    Dec 6, 2018
    5
    This game could be better if they fixed teambalance, physics and teamwork. its basically impossible to teamwork, when u cant barely communicate. I cant tell my teammates where the other are, without writing it in chat. its annoying. And I cant understand why a panzerfaust, cant kill a man, but it can kill a tank. Hitting a person in the head 4 time with a stg doesn't kill him, but onlyThis game could be better if they fixed teambalance, physics and teamwork. its basically impossible to teamwork, when u cant barely communicate. I cant tell my teammates where the other are, without writing it in chat. its annoying. And I cant understand why a panzerfaust, cant kill a man, but it can kill a tank. Hitting a person in the head 4 time with a stg doesn't kill him, but only damages him for 74 hit points. Right now its unplayable and you should probably not buy it. Instead enjoy some of the older battlefields, because they are a lot better.… Expand
  25. poplo220
    Jan 6, 2019
    5
    La campaña es aburrida, parece más un sniper elite low cost a un batllefield.
    Tiene muchos fallos gráficos, jugándolo a 1080p y en ultra las rocas parecen de lego y el mar está hecho de manera horrible, el gta IV es más realista que el batllefield respecto al agua.
    Lo mejor es el multijugador, que pese a todos los bugs que tiene (y a que es un copia y pega del 1) se hace entretenido, lo    La campaña es aburrida, parece más un sniper elite low cost a un batllefield.
    Tiene muchos fallos gráficos, jugándolo a 1080p y en ultra las rocas parecen de lego y el mar está hecho de manera horrible, el gta IV es más realista que el batllefield respecto al agua.
    Lo mejor es el multijugador, que pese a todos los bugs que tiene (y a que es un copia y pega del 1) se hace entretenido, lo malo son los desafíos que te piden completar las campañas al 100%, porque como dije antes la campaña es un bodrio intenso.

    Se me hace raro ver a tantas mujeres nazis en el ejército también, aunque eso no lo valoro de manera tan negativa como lo anterior.

    La jugabilidad es buena, pero es una copia del 1, los gráficos pese a las carencias anteriormente mencionadas son buenos y superan a los del último COD por goleada, pero para nada necesitas eso 6gb de Vram que te piden, porque se ven muchos fallos tontos.

    Las muertes las veo cutres, no hay desmembramiento, no hay gore, no hay nada, te puede explotar una granada en la mano que to vas a seguir igual pero muerto, además las escenas son surrealistas y parecen animaciones de muñecos a lo cod mw2.

    Algo surrealista que tiene el multijugador es que, por ejemplo un tanque te revienta con el cañón pero pese a eso sigues con la posibilidad de ser reanimado por el médico, le han quitado mucho realismo al juego.

    No se siente como un juego de la segunda guerra mundial para nada, le doy un aprobado por los avances técnicos, y porque sigue siendo mejor que COD, pero solo lo recomendaría por su multijugador y para nada me gastaría 60$ en este producto, lo recomiendo en rebajas.

    De todas formas la experiencia multijugador tiene la esperanza de ser mejorada puesto que en febrero viene el modo Battle Royale y demás adiciones, algo que dará más vidilla y entretenimiento al juego.

    La banda sonora es buena, pero es no es nada nuevo en un videojuego de EA (ya que es de las pocas cosas que hacen bien)

    Gráficos 6/10
    Modo Campaña 2/10
    Multijugador 7//10
    Banda Sonora 8/10
    Ambientación 4/10
    Rigor Histórico 3/10    … Expand
  26. Batareykin
    Nov 27, 2018
    7
    Very atmospheric game! But a score of 7 for:
    -Must play for the Nazis and kill the allies.
    -the developers propose to dress the fascists more beautiful. What for ???
    - there are friezes between maps.
  27. Kaera-kun
    Dec 10, 2018
    8
    DON'T LISTEN TO THE REVIEW BOMBERS!
    Great game with new mechanics improving the immersion to WW2. Hopefully we will see a good amount of extra content in the future as currently it is a bit lacking. Adding female soldiers to a WW2 game was a questionable choice though.
  28. Dante_Williams
    Nov 4, 2019
    7
    In a better place than where it was at launch but still has all the re-occurring issues from previous BF games. Devs seem to be very slow at updating the game also which makes the games maps and weapons get very repetitive very fast. Get on sale.
  29. videmon
    Nov 30, 2018
    6
    The game is one of the most fun once out of series and I personally have the most stable connect to servers since bf3. Gun play ,classes and progression is good though out. That said, the **** with story, lack of red army,swj **** and the fact that game is simply not finished is very upsetting. And the phrase "Soviets changed sides during the war" is not acceptable from company rep.
  30. Despacito2
    Nov 30, 2018
    8
    Battlefield V is a amazing game! it has the potential to become a 10/10, when DICE fixes some bugs and add some more content. Most people spamming bad reviews haven`t even played the game and gives no consturctive critisis.
    Despite women being in the game, it still feels like a WW2 games. I am personally against woman in the game, but i won`t make it stop me from enjoying the game! You    Battlefield V is a amazing game! it has the potential to become a 10/10, when DICE fixes some bugs and add some more content. Most people spamming bad reviews haven`t even played the game and gives no consturctive critisis.
    Despite women being in the game, it still feels like a WW2 games. I am personally against woman in the game, but i won`t make it stop me from enjoying the game! You can also choose if you want male female, and you can change your outfit. You can get plenty of outfits without spending a penny, but for those who want it, they will add a optain to buy outfits with real money.
    i currently give it a 8/10, but when the first free dlc comes out on 4.december the game properly deservs a 9/10    … Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

53
#53 Best PC Game of 2018
2
#2 Most Discussed PC Game of 2018
7
#7 Most Shared PC Game of 2018

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
81

Generally favorable reviews - based on 52 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 45 out of 52
  2. Mixed: 7 out of 52
  3. Negative: 0 out of 52
  1. CD-Action
    Nov 14, 2019
    85
    It’s far from being ideal but all the glitches and shortcomings don’t ruin the overall fun of Battlefield V’s multiplayer experience. Although the single player portion of the game is not bad at all, I would have been disappointed if I bought the game just for it. [13/2018, p.56]
  2. PLAY! Zine
    Mar 5, 2019
    80
    In Battlefield V we got back to WW2, but with refined gunplay and death system which works great. There are also little problems such as low number of maps and stability issues, that are taking the fun away, but nothing that can't be fixed.
    Read full review
  3. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Dec 31, 2018
    80
    A great World War II shooter that will grow and improve. Do not buy the game because of its singleplayer, but if you consider the campaign a bonus to the multiplayer, you will be satisfied. [Issue#291]
See all critic reviews »