Battlefield 4

 PC
User Score
6.3

Mixed or average reviews- based on 4118 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2,054 out of 4118
  2. Mixed: 847 out of 4118
  3. Negative: 1,217 out of 4118
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Gallorthemighty
    Dec 3, 2017
    0
    absolute garbage. I've never had a game that felt so alpha-build. the campaign is utterly atrocious, several times bugging out in such a way that required a full restart of the mission. this happening again on the Singapore mission which was shortly after the most annoying section up to that point, above and beyond being unable to swim through the Titan in the South China Sea mission,absolute garbage. I've never had a game that felt so alpha-build. the campaign is utterly atrocious, several times bugging out in such a way that required a full restart of the mission. this happening again on the Singapore mission which was shortly after the most annoying section up to that point, above and beyond being unable to swim through the Titan in the South China Sea mission, where you fight four tanks which gangbang you from as many different angles, then just past this point as you're crawling out of the muck, both the horribly balanced fight with the tanks and literal muck of the sewers you're crawling through, and up a second ladder, I fel through the map and the checkpoint saved behind me. an hour of gameplay just evaporating. and that delightful console button that I'm always so hesitant to use? graphics. it's to tune in the graphics and get information on how your system is handling it. this is beyond irresponsibility and jumps right into wasting the customer's time on purpose and with malice. nowhere on any forum is there any kind of fix for it beyond "just start the mission again" from the developers. truly unbelievable. yes, developer. now what about when it happens the second or the third time? how about instead you fix your **** game.
    i'm glad I'm playing this game now, and not when it was released. it was probably even more of a **** and having this in the light of the recent controversies with Visceral Games shutting down, Mass Effect: Andromeda being an utter mess with support being removed almost immediately after launch, and the Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) debacle, it seems like EA has been on a long-standing decline, and I hope things like this sink the company and their employees go on to find better jobs in less horribly managed development teams. it REALLY wouldn't have taken much to have a single person play through the finished game to find these bugs. a disappointment and a farce.    … Expand
  2. MRPP
    May 10, 2018
    4
    Garbage tier netcode, small playerbase, p2w lootboxes, cheaters everywhere, horrible single player, community servers run 3 maps, community-splitting DLC, horrible modern "progressions system" that locks good and fun stuff behind a grind (or a 30€ fee) that is prevalent in cod and battlefield games all around.

    It does have ok gunplay, the feel of a combined arms battle, nicely    Garbage tier netcode, small playerbase, p2w lootboxes, cheaters everywhere, horrible single player, community servers run 3 maps, community-splitting DLC, horrible modern "progressions system" that locks good and fun stuff behind a grind (or a 30€ fee) that is prevalent in cod and battlefield games all around.

    It does have ok gunplay, the feel of a combined arms battle, nicely destructible terrain and ok graphics even for an older title.

    Is it a good game though? Barely.    … Expand
  3. Jimbobbrown
    May 30, 2014
    4
    I've pretty much boycotted E.A. after DA2 and the mess that was ME3 but I got this game free with a graphics card. It has good things; graphics, physics and sound (although slightly bugged sometimes). However the gameplay is a step back form BF2 and 3 (also got 3 free) and wiffs too much of Call of Duty. In single player if you shoot an enemy in the face be prepared for them to getI've pretty much boycotted E.A. after DA2 and the mess that was ME3 but I got this game free with a graphics card. It has good things; graphics, physics and sound (although slightly bugged sometimes). However the gameplay is a step back form BF2 and 3 (also got 3 free) and wiffs too much of Call of Duty. In single player if you shoot an enemy in the face be prepared for them to get straight back up and shoot at you and this is more irritating than the Ai possessing the ability to warp in new baddies like something from bloody star trek. So sod the single player (gave up half was as it was too mind numbing - story wasn't engaging enough to warrant such miserable whack-a-mole game mechanics). The multi-player is better but still not great (I have more fun on Planetside2 or Ghost Recon for example), something about the gun mechanics and movement just don't fit right (weapon feedback seems more like COD than previous games to me). Although I haven't experienced the worst of the "netcode" issues, i've seen enough to put me off playing any more. And I will get on record that running a game through your web browser is still not as easy as booting THE BLOODY GAME IN THE FIRST PLACE! Honestly no joke dice, just stop it. A UI is supposed to be easy and intuitive, not hidden between layer of useless stats and DLC adverts. Battlelog needs to die in a fire.… Expand
  4. B0GiE-uk-
    Nov 6, 2013
    4
    BF3 is a lot better than BF4, seems like a half arsed console port to the PC. Maps look like they were created with an Etch-A-Sketch. Blocky and not much detail in them at all. Oversized and blurred text and HUD, awful netcode and spawns. I have a feeling that the BF3 DICE team did not make this game. Attention to detail is poor. There is something really wrong with mouse movement, I can'tBF3 is a lot better than BF4, seems like a half arsed console port to the PC. Maps look like they were created with an Etch-A-Sketch. Blocky and not much detail in them at all. Oversized and blurred text and HUD, awful netcode and spawns. I have a feeling that the BF3 DICE team did not make this game. Attention to detail is poor. There is something really wrong with mouse movement, I can't put my finger on it.
    Graphic effects are overdone, balance feels wrong, snipers are too effective. Not happy with the state of this game at all and I'm a BF fan over COD. I was thinking of giving this 6/10 but after a 2 year wait and what I thought was going to be an awesome game i'm going to have to give it 4/10.
    Must do better, shocking and piss poor from EA and DICE.    … Expand
  5. niknuk
    Nov 19, 2013
    4
    Singleplayer never got my interest, and the AI feels a bit stupid sometimes, probably more then average. But its the multiplayer I was after.
    And that is a pretty good experience.. when you don`t loose connection to the server that is. Or when you don`t freeze and crash.
    Just too sad that one month after release, and several patches out, Its an achievement to complete 2 matches in 2h.    Singleplayer never got my interest, and the AI feels a bit stupid sometimes, probably more then average. But its the multiplayer I was after.
    And that is a pretty good experience.. when you don`t loose connection to the server that is. Or when you don`t freeze and crash.
    Just too sad that one month after release, and several patches out, Its an achievement to complete 2 matches in 2h. Spoils the fun of ranking up, and the multiplayer experience in general (you loose all xp gained during the match)    … Expand
  6. OccipitaL
    Aug 20, 2014
    2
    I've been playing Battlefield series since Battlefield 1942, I really like the first 5 or 6 games of this trademark but Battlefield 4 is an absolute disgrace. I bought the game and premium and almost 1 year in it's still full of errors, bugs, glitches and performance problems. Dice tries real hard to keep this game as a failure. Even with all these problems the game has they start to workI've been playing Battlefield series since Battlefield 1942, I really like the first 5 or 6 games of this trademark but Battlefield 4 is an absolute disgrace. I bought the game and premium and almost 1 year in it's still full of errors, bugs, glitches and performance problems. Dice tries real hard to keep this game as a failure. Even with all these problems the game has they start to work on an another Battlefield title instead of fixing the latest. Congratulations Dice, you have ruined a great series.… Expand
  7. nanddo
    Apr 16, 2015
    0
    Campaign mode is unplayable, full of bugs, it suddenly crashes the game, and it is 20 GB of size on disk Pathetic. I´m now stuck on the same level because the game does not know how to recover, even if i restart the game.
  8. legomyhobo
    Jul 11, 2014
    2
    Most of a year after release:
    1/2 the time, the game crashes as it tries to find a server.
    About 20 minutes before the game crashes WHEN in game It requires dlc and you shall find servers more limited if you don't buy them. Usually no team balancing, so 1/2 the time, servers will be unbalanced in terms of skill and no fun. BUT - when the campaign isn't crashing, it is satisfying    Most of a year after release:
    1/2 the time, the game crashes as it tries to find a server.
    About 20 minutes before the game crashes WHEN in game

    It requires dlc and you shall find servers more limited if you don't buy them.
    Usually no team balancing, so 1/2 the time, servers will be unbalanced in terms of skill and no fun.

    BUT - when the campaign isn't crashing, it is satisfying (if only that was a larger part of the experience)    … Expand
  9. The_Haminator
    Mar 3, 2014
    4
    Battlefield 4 - basically a dumb down and even more casualized (yes I made that word up) version of BF3 except with more customization.

    This review is going to be directed toward players coming from BF3 and will be multiplayer focused, more of a comparison if you will. Pro's compared to BF3 in my opinion. -More variation and customization across the board including weapon    Battlefield 4 - basically a dumb down and even more casualized (yes I made that word up) version of BF3 except with more customization.

    This review is going to be directed toward players coming from BF3 and will be multiplayer focused, more of a comparison if you will.

    Pro's compared to BF3 in my opinion.

    -More variation and customization across the board including weapon accessories, weapons themselves, kit upgrades and gadgets.

    -Improvement in overall sound quality (gun report echos etc)

    -More game modes

    -strengthened naval combat presence.

    Now the Con's compared to BF3 in my opinion.

    -Serious hit reg and lag issues (apparently being worked on alongside all the typical expensive EA DLC)

    -Average projectile speed about 50% the speed of a comparable projectile in BF3 (everything that can be fired moves much slower then it's BF3 counterparts to the point of feeling as if some weapons are more similar to space weapons (see halo series covenant weapons). This makes for much more drug out fights over medium to long distances especially with most vehicle weapons.

    -Bullet spread and inaccuracy even higher then in BF3, (you want to see a newer FPS game doing small arms right?, give Insurgency a try.

    -Even more conquest uncap spawn rape then BF3 matches normally experience.

    Now taking these con's into consideration from what I've experienced in-game this has turned BF4 into more of an imprecise game of chance and guesswork where your PDW and carbine bullets move at the speed of your average pellet gun (meaning firing at a guy 50m away running to the side requires you to shoot an absurd and unrealistically far distance ahead of him to hit) and your 120mm tank cannon acts more like an over-sized potato gun or T-shirt launcher rather then a real cannon. (No biggie at 1 kilometer you only have to aim approx 100 feet above target to be on).

    Now I know this game isn't mean't to be all about realism etc but they definitely took an even bigger step away from reality, competitiveness and skill based gameplay with BF4 compared to BF3. Obviously they're choosing to make it more approachable and tolerable to lower skilled and casual players so as to sell more but this version is beyond something I can enjoy playing online. Its much harder to consistently hit targets with most weapons at further ranges, thus forcing players to get very close to each other before being able to engage semi-reliably.

    This game will do just fine as the market for casual gamers is huge. (see last 5 years of COD clones for proof) But for those of us that enjoy a stronger level of teamwork, realism and skill in our games It's safer to stick with BF3 or even better yet BFBC2, both are much better games then BF4 in my opinion even with their age and lack of refined customization and weapon variety.    … Expand
  10. stuv101
    Oct 8, 2014
    1
    Where to start... I'll start with the good features of battlefield: 64 player multi-player, good weapon customization, and platoon based clans / large player grouped communities.

    Here is what they got wrong: They pushed the game out in an unfinished state back in October of 2013; ever since then it's just been one giant beta test (funny story, they already did a beta test before    Where to start... I'll start with the good features of battlefield: 64 player multi-player, good weapon customization, and platoon based clans / large player grouped communities.

    Here is what they got wrong: They pushed the game out in an unfinished state back in October of 2013; ever since then it's just been one giant beta test (funny story, they already did a beta test before releasing the game) to try to get the game in somewhat decent condition. It's been a full year now since the release of the game, and they managed to fix "some" of the bugs and glitches. (For some reason, they also had their Battlepack micro transactions perfectly intact during launch, but the game was broken). The single player campaign is a joke, as it's only purpose is showing off the features of the game's features and capabilities, rather than gameplay. A great example of this is with the 3rd mission "South China Sea", you enter the remains of an aircraft carrier to find a data stick. during the mission, you have to go under water to get to another area of the mission. This segment had no effect on the gameplay or story, but only served to show off the underwater physics and effects. As of October 8th, 2014, they have release nearly all of their dlc; so I might as well review those pieces of content as well.

    China Rising: This dlc is OK, as it provided maps that appealed to all the classes in the game. However, the "Levelutions" are missing from these maps; they either rushed this expansion out as well, or decided that levelution was just to much for the engine of the game (or to much of a gimmick for anyone to care about).

    Second Assault: This is basically a couple of maps from Battlefield 3 that they implemented into Battlefield 4. This map pack is actually pretty good as it added weather "levelutions" to some of the maps and improved on the already well known maps.

    Navel Strike: oh my god; what didn't they mess up on this map pack (this is where I started to really have problems with their game). First of all, the weapons in this expansion are either over powered (AWS, AR160), ore are the weakest, most worthless guns in the game (SR338, SW40). Textures would start rendering as i played (on all their maps including vanilla maps), and for some stupid reason, my FPS was throttled down during gameplay (unless i restarted my PC every time I wanted to play BF4). These aren't the only issues I had with this expansion pack; the map designs sound cool (with island warfare and attack boats ), but fails in gameplay. Traversing the maps are a chore if you don't have a boat or an air craft. objectives are easy to hold once you clear the island of enemy players (cause boats and choppers are sky-lined in the big empty water). Also this expansion had the BIG reveal of the mystic Megaladon; honestly, they put more work into a prehistoric shark, than they did fixing their own game.... let that sink in...

    Dragon's Teeth: Same as China Rising, but with levelutions.. so it's an OK expansion.

    Conclusion: Do I want to play a game that requires me to restart my computer in order to get maximum performance?

    Do I want to play a game where the developers put more effort into Easter Eggs and forum events than fixing the game?

    Do I want to play a game that's still in beta testing (yes it's still in beta testing, it's called Battlefield CTE. CTE = Community, TEST, Environment)?

    The answer is no. I did have high hopes for this game, I really did. However, this game ultimately failed to deliver. DICE should be ashamed of themselves for: 1.) releasing the game in a broken state. 2.) failing to fix the game in a timely manner. For me, Battlefield 4 ruined the reputation of DICE as a development team. I'm sorry DICE, but i'll never play one of your games again, not after what I experienced with BF4.    … Expand
  11. Enepelano77
    Mar 17, 2014
    0
    Este juego esta rotisimo, la campaña es basura sin sentido y llena de bugs, el online esta lleno de camperos y noobs que solo saben poner claymores y c4, y ademas falla constantemente, no es normal que una simple pistola quite mas que un revolver eso es simplemente estupido
  12. krazykev101
    Mar 19, 2014
    0
    This game has too many flaws from date of release now 4 -5 months later and getting worse. The M1911 pistol is missing 3x scope, the gold battlepacks dont drop dog tags(only emblems and xp boosts. The missions are screwed up and not rewarding dog tags upon completion. There are 6 vehicles which wont registrar progress and cant get dog tags for them. Assignments no longer offer silver andThis game has too many flaws from date of release now 4 -5 months later and getting worse. The M1911 pistol is missing 3x scope, the gold battlepacks dont drop dog tags(only emblems and xp boosts. The missions are screwed up and not rewarding dog tags upon completion. There are 6 vehicles which wont registrar progress and cant get dog tags for them. Assignments no longer offer silver and gold battle packs as was in beginning. Battle pack dog tags not being released if no silver or gold packs can be given for assignments. This game is literally just for spare time gamers and not for the dedicated dog tag seekers.… Expand
  13. Liberty0rDeath
    Apr 3, 2014
    1
    This game is a barrage or problems and bugs. Levolution is a gimmick as each event is scripted and uninteresting. Hit detection is horrid and getting shot behind walls a constant reminder that the game is indeed broken. It has been nearly 6 months since its release and there are still major bugs, like rubber bandingThis game is a barrage or problems and bugs. Levolution is a gimmick as each event is scripted and uninteresting. Hit detection is horrid and getting shot behind walls a constant reminder that the game is indeed broken. It has been nearly 6 months since its release and there are still major bugs, like rubber banding (http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/news/view/addressing-bf4-rubber-banding-issues/).

    Save yourself some frustration and pass up on this game.    … Expand
  14. aj587
    May 2, 2014
    1
    I'm basing the game off the multiplayer experience. The single-player was a half-hour Call of Duty trailer where you keep wondering what the hell the mission is about.

    I give the game a 1. PROS: - Beautiful graphics Cons: -Dying behind corners constantly -"Trading kills" 95% of the time I die. -I've seen my sniper bullets literally go through my enemy's head, he wasn't even    I'm basing the game off the multiplayer experience. The single-player was a half-hour Call of Duty trailer where you keep wondering what the hell the mission is about.

    I give the game a 1.
    PROS:
    - Beautiful graphics

    Cons:
    -Dying behind corners constantly
    -"Trading kills" 95% of the time I die.
    -I've seen my sniper bullets literally go through my enemy's head, he wasn't even injured.
    -Vehicle collisions are the worst. A dirtbike could slightly nudge your tank and you would go all over the place. Mario Karts on the N64 has better vehicle physics
    - The Attack Helicopter is still a flying coffin to this date
    - AA can destroy air vehicles at enemy spawn, even when the AA is at his own spawn on most maps.
    - AA is still overpowered
    - Developers have given up on the game and are going to announce a new one. Last patch was 2 months ago and this game has an endless list of bugs
    -Childish, Hello Kitty and Spongebob vehicle camos. I didn't buy BF4 to watch other kids live out their anime dream in a military shooter.
    - Most people either crash, freeze, or have low FPS (not me anymore)
    - AC130. Why? Not only is it on like every map, it is almost unstoppable. There is still a glitch (that lasted 2+ patches) where you're AC10 rockets don't register on the enemy and where enemy jets/helis can't damage you even when direct shots are fired.

    I GIVE UP, DONT BUY ANYMORE DICE GAMES.

    They had countless opportunities to fix the game even if EA did "rush them". Still haven't. Do not ever pre-order an EA or DICE game.    … Expand
  15. Enforcer574
    May 27, 2014
    4
    Battlefield 4 makes it obvious from the get-go that it values graphics over everything else. And the graphics are nothing short of stunning. But as EA should know by now, stunning visuals and sound effects don't make a game. And Battlefield 4's HD experience is ruined by the unstable game engine, slow matchmaking and server connections, dodgy connections in general, and the constantBattlefield 4 makes it obvious from the get-go that it values graphics over everything else. And the graphics are nothing short of stunning. But as EA should know by now, stunning visuals and sound effects don't make a game. And Battlefield 4's HD experience is ruined by the unstable game engine, slow matchmaking and server connections, dodgy connections in general, and the constant pestering to give EA more money.

    I don't believe for one second that microtransactions and DLC are inherently bad. But how they're implemented can either enhance the game and make the developers a lot more money, or can completely ruin the experience. In Battlefield 4, it's the latter. It's one thing to include a microtransaction system in a free-to-play game. But when your game costs $60 USD, you're already pushing it. BF4 continues to be updated with expansion packs, which cost $15 each. Sure, you can just not buy them- but good luck finding a server that doesn't require them! Even servers playing on stock BF4 maps still regularly reject players who do not have the expansion packs installed. Players can also pay money to skip leveling (a feature common across almost all next-gen titles, unfortunately) and get a "premium membership" where their XP earned is doubled. This trend of "double XP" modes in games has already made the EXP/leveling system pop up in games where you'd least expect it as a cheap cop-out way to add microtransactions into the game. The worst part of paying to skip leveling is the massive number of inexperienced little kids running around with all the best weapons in the game because they got a hold of their mom's credit card. It totally ruins the balance of the game.

    On top of all that, Battlefield 4 just isn't that much different from its predecessor to warrant me forking over $60, or more like $100+ if I actually want to play. Levelution is naught but a gimmick. 90% of the time, levelution-based changes to the map are purely aesthetic and hardly affect gameplay at all. And when you consider how slow the server connections are, even on the fastest fiber optic connections, and how buggy and unstable the game is, you're better off sticking to BF3.    … Expand
  16. Decaymoss
    Oct 16, 2016
    4
    Hardly playable at the moment with the amount of hackers still on the servers. The map designs on MP is pretty poor as well with lots of clear opening for sniping. There are times where I know where the sniper is but not able to retaliate unless I go sniping as well. Worth to pick it up if you have find it in the bargain bin and nothing else to play for MP
  17. xenzorg
    May 30, 2014
    2
    Don't waste your time on this glitchy and badly optimized ****
    Battlefield 3 was few times better and worked perfectly (i7 3770k, gtx 770, 16gb ram, etc.)
  18. locksun323
    Jun 3, 2014
    1
    half a year later and a couple of months gameplay, and still a couple of problems on multiplayer. dont buy, waste of money, nothing new on campaign and multiplayer is just a mess(disconnections / unable to join).
  19. davila979
    Jun 28, 2014
    4
    game is no good I go back to COD, how is that a pistol beat a LMG? you have to shot twice a person to kill him with a sniper rifle, and then you have to struggle to get to the next gun and do the same thing as the one before, that not happens in COD, this is a huge disappointment. and for get attachments its up hill with some guns in COD you have coins so you kill people get coins and buygame is no good I go back to COD, how is that a pistol beat a LMG? you have to shot twice a person to kill him with a sniper rifle, and then you have to struggle to get to the next gun and do the same thing as the one before, that not happens in COD, this is a huge disappointment. and for get attachments its up hill with some guns in COD you have coins so you kill people get coins and buy attachments or guns fast is more fun… Expand
  20. talledos
    Jul 7, 2014
    1
    As a gamer I feel ashamed to have contributed to the culture of defective products with a pretty face, BF4 for PS3 crashes randomly over and over, it's frustrating, along with the hit detection working when it pleases, so, this is the last game I ever buy from this franchise.

    We should require finished products, not betas and paying insane amount of money for products that are gonna be    As a gamer I feel ashamed to have contributed to the culture of defective products with a pretty face, BF4 for PS3 crashes randomly over and over, it's frustrating, along with the hit detection working when it pleases, so, this is the last game I ever buy from this franchise.

    We should require finished products, not betas and paying insane amount of money for products that are gonna be patched like a crack whore. It should be a fun game, it is not, it is frustrating.    … Expand
  21. mtbiker033
    Aug 4, 2014
    0
    Horrible "netcode" 30hz/10hz even with the CTE 30hz/30hz there are still plenty of wtf moments which lead to hackusations in every match.

    DLC campaign obviously more important than fixing the broken mess of crap DICE Sweden created.

    The campaign is a boring joke of hearing "RECKER, RECKER" a million times...
  22. gui2310gBR
    Apr 3, 2015
    0
    only thing I know of that game and has many bugs installed this game when I started playing password asked to play but I had not wanted eai not provide password scrotum game
  23. Derrik4999
    Mar 24, 2017
    4
    I hate this game just because

    They just pissed their pants and thought "oh noone is gonna see that we just **** up battlefield 3 and put in a few new maps haha we're so smart oh yeah lets also **** up some weapons and give them more costumization which is useless instead! haha we're so smart"
  24. noobsalot
    Dec 16, 2015
    3
    The jump from console to PC is unforgiving. Controller support seems to be completely abandoned and useless, game breaking bugs that ruin all matter of game play.

    The new maps are nice to see, because it lets me know that DICE is still working on this, but they shouldn't STILL be working it.. I do like the maps though, because they're big and immersive. Levolution is great to include in    The jump from console to PC is unforgiving. Controller support seems to be completely abandoned and useless, game breaking bugs that ruin all matter of game play.

    The new maps are nice to see, because it lets me know that DICE is still working on this, but they shouldn't STILL be working it.. I do like the maps though, because they're big and immersive. Levolution is great to include in them, but those only lead to more bugs.

    And the whole "Buy to win" factor makes the multiplayer very boring. Whats the point in advancing in this game if you can have rich kids drop $100+ just to give them a "fair chance"    … Expand
  25. Ordnik
    Jul 1, 2021
    0
    Sound design is terrible. Visualization is a mess, it's hard to spot people. Colors and contrast is hurting my eyes. Weapons feel like toys.
  26. Filzof
    May 7, 2020
    0
    Oyunu olay kısmında ki yapay zeka mai. Çevrim içi olan kısımda ise 3 durum söz konusu parayı veren kazanır , yüksek dereceli kişi sayısı fazla olan alır ve son olarak aslında bu bir kısım değil ama ben öyle sayıyorum düşük dereceli iseniz direkt atarlar ki bence çevrim içi olan bir oyuna ki onca para vermişim ki böyle olmaması gerek hiç değilse insanları dereceye göre eşleştirseydiniz deOyunu olay kısmında ki yapay zeka mai. Çevrim içi olan kısımda ise 3 durum söz konusu parayı veren kazanır , yüksek dereceli kişi sayısı fazla olan alır ve son olarak aslında bu bir kısım değil ama ben öyle sayıyorum düşük dereceli iseniz direkt atarlar ki bence çevrim içi olan bir oyuna ki onca para vermişim ki böyle olmaması gerek hiç değilse insanları dereceye göre eşleştirseydiniz de maçlardan atmasalardı. Bu yüzden ve oyunu gereksiz zorlaştırma çabalarınızdan ötürü puanım 0 dır.… Expand
  27. chadowski
    Jun 30, 2020
    4
    This game had so much potential but devs decided to throw it out of the window, multiplayer hit detection is non existent, there were moments i was one meter away from enemy and they had been standing and my bullets still wouldnt register. Whole multiplayer is like this if you arent on 144hz server which is impossible to find. It would be a perfect game if it had good netcode.
  28. mikey42782
    Jan 21, 2014
    0
    Let me start out by saying that I have purchased every battlefield, ever made..Loved bad company..wish they kept bad company..but they didnt and for that they are a bunch of asshats at EA..

    That being said, i honestly thought that they took a huge stupid step releasing this game on origin only and you have to play it from a web browser but that's besides the point. I said i wouldn't    Let me start out by saying that I have purchased every battlefield, ever made..Loved bad company..wish they kept bad company..but they didnt and for that they are a bunch of asshats at EA..

    That being said, i honestly thought that they took a huge stupid step releasing this game on origin only and you have to play it from a web browser but that's besides the point.

    I said i wouldn't get it but it was on sale black friday so i got it. i got the "deluxe" edition, which is **** it says you have the expansion pack "china rising"..what they didn't tell you those no good **** is that "premium customers" get to "unlock the content" two weeks before everyone else..that stung for a bit..why in the sam hill would i purchase it if that was the case? the deluxe edition no less? all to get your hard earned **** cash thats all it is.

    the game was released in what, November? rushed to try and beat the call of duty sales(which as much as cod sucks, it will never beat call of duty i am sorry i hate to admit, i don't play it but they won't outsell it). I played the game in beta because i own battlefield 3 and when i played the game it was just like the beta.
    my video drivers are up to date..my windows is up to date..pc is pretty good pc but i still got the error saying my video card wasnt the updated version(which it was) and that i could still run the game but it might crash and not cooperate..
    well crash it did..constantly..stuck on the **** loading screen. disconnected from games..so i uninstalled and resinstalled it, thinking maybe i had missed something..but no. i tried talking to my man hajib over there, the lovely customer service rep and he was dumb as a stone, offered no help just wanted to see a screen shot of my dxdiag.
    I hate to say this..but i am done with the battlefield franchise..i work too hard for my money to be let down. I can't rate this game fully because i didn't enjoy it fully. so the bottom line is if you liked battledfield? stick with the 2nd one, hell if u can stand the web browser and origin even the third one..but ea has gotten my money for the last time..may the rot on the vine and finally get the same dick in their **** that they have been giving us customers for years    … Expand
  29. Galloway
    Jun 8, 2014
    0
    I've been playing this franchise since 1942 beta (over 10 years), but have left it due to such a sloppy and release. It's too bad because the game had such potential, but it literally unplayable. There is a 75 page thread on EA regarding ATI cards having memory leaks that locks up the game, and it has still not been fixed.

    On top of that, rush seems to get worse with each release. Bad    I've been playing this franchise since 1942 beta (over 10 years), but have left it due to such a sloppy and release. It's too bad because the game had such potential, but it literally unplayable. There is a 75 page thread on EA regarding ATI cards having memory leaks that locks up the game, and it has still not been fixed.

    On top of that, rush seems to get worse with each release. Bad Company 2 had the best rush but it just keeps getting worse to the point of not even being worth it.

    I am an extremely patient person to the point where I've been called a saint for the things I've put up, but I've run out of patience for this. Congrats EA in living up to your "most evil company" award 2 years in a row! You took a storied franchise and messed it up.    … Expand
  30. darekpl
    Nov 4, 2013
    4
    Ive registered here to write my review of this game cause it give me alot of nerves.
    Single player is full of BUGS! Sometimes you cant even finish level cause some enemy go under ground. Game crashes to Windows, after loading checkpoint I stuck in some place forever. I dont mention that checkpoints are 30 min game from each other so when you will fail in 29 min of mission bam you need    Ive registered here to write my review of this game cause it give me alot of nerves.
    Single player is full of BUGS! Sometimes you cant even finish level cause some enemy go under ground. Game crashes to Windows, after loading checkpoint I stuck in some place forever. I dont mention that checkpoints are 30 min game from each other so when you will fail in 29 min of mission bam you need play it allllll again. Waste of time.
    I was fan of BF3 and I like single also but BF4 is really buggy and crappy. OFC graphics are very good but sorry they release unfinished crap! Shame on EA, shame on Dice!    … Expand
  31. Motolight
    Nov 4, 2013
    1
    Lags. DLC for BF3. Lags again. Crashes, bugs. Teamplay more like deathmatch. Horrible level design (except for Paracel one). All of this calls itself "newest modern massive action game". For 40$.
    How about NO. I really sorry about my 40$, I've never spent it so useless way. NEVER.
  32. AFAR
    Nov 4, 2013
    1
    Unplayable, laggy betafield 3.5
    1. Aviation is totally nerfed and unbalanced.
    2. Graphic is worse than BF3.
    3. New maps are the smallest in the BF series
  33. mike2003
    May 26, 2015
    0
    For me this is the best game in the series. I compared with BFBC2 and BF3. The game just disgusting even after many patches. The feel of the MP gameplay is very bad. I do not trust DICE.
  34. TheAlgerian
    Dec 10, 2014
    3
    Battlefield takes the crown as the worst multiplayer FPS I've ever played.
    Netcode is absolutely abysmal, the bullets seem to travel through time, you can often feel like you got killed before your enemy even saw you. and the gameplay is terrible, the whole thing looks like rabbits running and hoping around with guns.
  35. christopher_A
    Nov 3, 2013
    4
    barely playable

    all the bugs and crashes makes it more frustrating than fun to play

    EA should offer at least 10% back in of purchase due to them selling an unfinished product.

    NOT WHAT I PAYED 110$ FOR!!!
  36. Spider_Pig
    Nov 3, 2013
    0
    BF4 is the worst game of the series, stupid and short campaign, crashes, bugs, lags, freezes, progress in MP doesn't save, server crashes. I can't even play one round without crash!!! Levolution looks just like stupid childish explosions, 2 years they were making it, Frostbite 3 is much worse than Frostbite 2. The only positive moment is graphics, but... The AI is just awful.
  37. Solidus784
    Jan 22, 2014
    0
    I've been a fan of battlefield for several years but this will probably be the last release i buy .It has been released in an inexcusable unstable state with constant game crashes too many bugs to mention horrible hit registration making any attempt at competitive gameplay a completely random joke. DO NOT GIVE EA/DICE YOUR MONEY FOR THIS !. Such a disappointment.
  38. Ironshark6969
    Jan 23, 2014
    0
    Worst BF ever, lag, bugs, netcode broken, and a lot of errors, XBOX360, never buy another battlefield or another game from EA (Scamers) is a game they trow to the people, they don't finish the game and they sell the game becose the stupid propaganda and all the marketing.
  39. OZxQB
    Feb 13, 2014
    1
    10 points. Great game when it works.

    -9 points for the worst supported game I've invested money up-front for, including "premium". Still crashing months after release. I hope people in quality assurance at EA / DICE were fired over releasing an incomplete game (as of Feb 2014). I'd get a refund except I was naive enough to trust them when they said they'd fix the problems. Now I'm    10 points. Great game when it works.

    -9 points for the worst supported game I've invested money up-front for, including "premium". Still crashing months after release. I hope people in quality assurance at EA / DICE were fired over releasing an incomplete game (as of Feb 2014). I'd get a refund except I was naive enough to trust them when they said they'd fix the problems. Now I'm outside EA's "great game guarantee" time period... what a joke.    … Expand
  40. kenti123
    Nov 16, 2013
    0
    pure trash!!.DONT BUY! cant even play the damn game. no point in buying something that dont work. had so high hopes for it but never expected this beta stage game, a shame really and why release it like this? lol WTF!?
  41. Subliminality
    Nov 13, 2013
    4
    No, this is not the game we were promised, this isn't the game we were shown at Gamescom, E3 etc etc. This game, while it may be fun while you can enjoy it. Is one of the buggiest games I've ever had to play on launch. "Now hold on a second, you're just saying that because you hate the franchise and you've never played it before Blah Blah Blah." Well you're wrong, while I may not be theNo, this is not the game we were promised, this isn't the game we were shown at Gamescom, E3 etc etc. This game, while it may be fun while you can enjoy it. Is one of the buggiest games I've ever had to play on launch. "Now hold on a second, you're just saying that because you hate the franchise and you've never played it before Blah Blah Blah." Well you're wrong, while I may not be the most die hard Battlefield fan I've been playing since bad company one all the way through and you know what? On launch there was never any problems of on the same level that are in BF4.

    This is why I'm giving it such a terrible review, because while the gameplay may be amazing as we were promised, you'll never get to experience it with all the crashes, and it isn't just me experiencing this, around the world people haven't been able to play the buggy mess that is BF4. So if you want my advice, go out and buy BF3 premium, you'll get your money's worth, because it's been several weeks and EA isn't looking like patching the game anytime soon...    … Expand
  42. xXAmaranthineXx
    Nov 3, 2013
    4
    Battlefield 4? I'm still waiting for this game. What I have that has been foolishly named Battlefield 4 would be more accurately called "Call of Battle, Modern Field Warfare".
    The game looks like I'm playing Modern Warfare, not a bad game but its not Battlefield.
    The sad fact is, they spent more time creating the game for the console tards than actually making a game for the general    Battlefield 4? I'm still waiting for this game. What I have that has been foolishly named Battlefield 4 would be more accurately called "Call of Battle, Modern Field Warfare".
    The game looks like I'm playing Modern Warfare, not a bad game but its not Battlefield.
    The sad fact is, they spent more time creating the game for the console tards than actually making a game for the general public and keeping it in the scheme of Battlefield 3. The graphics aren't as good as 3.
    The worst part is, if you are playing on PC your game crashes far too much for enjoyable game play. What the hell was the beta for if they can't fix that pre release? Dice say they fixed the hitmarkers, this is a lie. There seems to be a lack of quality all round, The sound drops out, textures go away at times, sniping is made way to easy and the hud in jets and choppers is such a bad colour you cant see it at times while flying.
    If I didn't know any better I would say the game was rushed to market.
    The new aspect of course being commander. What a boring game mechanic, You sit there and do what? drop things strategically while your whole team is just messing about. Its a great concept but heavily floored.

    Despite the above mentioned though, I enjoy Call of Battle, Modern Field Warfare. Though that could just be down to my squad    … Expand
  43. poda_t
    Nov 3, 2013
    4
    Why repeating and spitting the same thing out over and over again is acceptable, I'm not sure. We've seen permutations of the same thing coming out repeatedly, and I don't see the need to applaud the effort that went into this game. It's the same old with a glossy new finish, and a couple of tweaks that really should have been included much earlier (like being able to resume reloading).Why repeating and spitting the same thing out over and over again is acceptable, I'm not sure. We've seen permutations of the same thing coming out repeatedly, and I don't see the need to applaud the effort that went into this game. It's the same old with a glossy new finish, and a couple of tweaks that really should have been included much earlier (like being able to resume reloading). The first person story is a disaster. Not only is it predictable, it denies all sense, and loves riding the sino-russian thing to the grave. We get it. It's an easy idea to run off of. I paid you ~$70. Show me you deserve it. It's not enough to demand that much for basically the same game with only a new gloss--which wasn't really needed for the game experience (yay, realistic sun in my eyes... great, now can i have the key/control that lets me present my realistic hand to block the angle of the sun?.....? well? if you're going to waste so much time adding irritants, you're not doing yourself any favors here...)It's not enough to pay $70 to also update the game and essentially present it as a hacker-free environment... it's going to last for all of 3-6 months at best.

    On to the interface. BF3 was ridiculously convenient for navigating squad settings, picking out your weapons and attachments, along with squad perks. It was very quick and easy to access this customization. Despite having played the beta and played this game for a while, the entire thing is still opaque to me. The amount of information available is a bit ridiculous, especially where it neither adds to the game, nor to the player's awareness of the fire-arms.

    -3 for a ridiculous single player campaign. Single player was the main driving reason for which I buy games, it also has to be fun to play solo, and re-playable. Some stories are brilliant, and there are games I enjoy re-playing for the single-player component. The single player in this was trash. And that's ignoring the fact that a squad of mentally disabled children would have been more effective for helping you play through the single player than the AI that governs the single-player team-mates.

    -3 for what is fundamentally a recycle with a spit-polish. I appreciate that there is only so much that can be done with an idea, but, really, I just don't see what Dice has tried to do in order to keep my loyalty apart from un-necessarily lavishing me with more guns to choose from. I expected the beta release to be fairly elementary. It's not the case. The beta is exactly what you will buy.    … Expand
  44. therealopie
    Nov 4, 2013
    4
    Full of glitches and occasional game breaking bugs. The netcode is STILL bad, even after almost a dozen Battlefield games. I hope you like getting shot around corners before you even crest it! The menu is a complete mess of pretty colors and eye-searing white lines, making it difficult to navigate at all, and impossible to do quickly and efficiently.

    Graphics are sub-par. The game    Full of glitches and occasional game breaking bugs. The netcode is STILL bad, even after almost a dozen Battlefield games. I hope you like getting shot around corners before you even crest it! The menu is a complete mess of pretty colors and eye-searing white lines, making it difficult to navigate at all, and impossible to do quickly and efficiently.

    Graphics are sub-par. The game dazzles you with lots of pretty colored explosions, but it can't hide the 2004 style textures and modelling.

    Of course, you have to pay incredible amounts of money to get the full game experience.

    I haven't even scratched the surface. This game is very sub-par. Basically just Battlefield 3.2

    It's tragic, because BF2 was probably my favorite shooter of all time. But the series has just been so bad for so long. I'm done with it. And EA/Dice altogether.    … Expand
  45. miksikis
    Jan 22, 2014
    0
    This game is absolutely broken full of bugs and even 4 months in the problems keep getting worse. I've lost all respect for EA and DICE.

    BUYERS BEWARE, stay away from this game.
  46. Rulix
    Jan 26, 2014
    0
    This game is .. not worth paying a dollar for and let me tell you why:

    * LOTS of bugs and glitches
    * LOTS of game crashes
    * Unbalanced weapons / explosives
    * Ridiculous spawnpoints right in front of an ennemy
    * Worst team-balance ever coded

    Really disappointed..
  47. LayZ
    Jan 28, 2014
    3
    As a HUGE Battlefield fan, I was looking forward to BF4 as i thought they might have learnt from all their mistakes in BF3.. I was dissapointed. Will no longer be supporting this franchise, and I dont say that lightly as DICE has given me at least 1000+ hours of entertainment in the past with the series.
  48. battlefieldblow
    Feb 6, 2014
    0
    Totally buggy and unplayable game. Among the show-stoppers is a 0-health bug that makes some players invincible. This happens every fourth-third time you die, and DICE still hasn't fixed it.

    Don't buy it, don't fund this crap.
  49. WellIfIHaveTo
    Feb 8, 2014
    4
    Overall, not that good. BF4 is not a good progression in the game series. Basic game components are broken such as bad net code, glitches in gun-play, and unrefined game-play. The maps are not very good and over cluttered. This game was released far before it was ready and it shows. They tried to make it too much like CoD and less like Battlefield. I would not spend any more money onOverall, not that good. BF4 is not a good progression in the game series. Basic game components are broken such as bad net code, glitches in gun-play, and unrefined game-play. The maps are not very good and over cluttered. This game was released far before it was ready and it shows. They tried to make it too much like CoD and less like Battlefield. I would not spend any more money on this game and would like my money back.… Expand
  50. MrRan
    Feb 27, 2015
    1
    I turned to Battlefield 4 because I am tired of the COD **** then I found it is even worse than COD !!!... The single player campaign task designs are so bad.. no Bots to play before I can join in Multiplayer.. how can I practice??? I will never buy any battlefield again. I played battlefield 3 before, it was slightly better than this latest crap.
  51. MaxBressler
    May 28, 2014
    3
    This game is full of problems. I don't even know where to start.
    How about the fact that I got this with my Radeon R9 graphics card for free and it still is horribly flawed and it's on the border of hatred?
    The main reason this game is horrible is because this game is carrying a **** ton of bugs that DICE and EA are ignoring. Oh, and also, the single player is a broken piece of ****.    This game is full of problems. I don't even know where to start.
    How about the fact that I got this with my Radeon R9 graphics card for free and it still is horribly flawed and it's on the border of hatred?
    The main reason this game is horrible is because this game is carrying a **** ton of bugs that DICE and EA are ignoring. Oh, and also, the single player is a broken piece of ****.
    And also the maps are boring and the levolutions are nothing to **** your pants over.
    Basically, what I'm saying is to not buy this game.
    There are only a few things holding this game up, such as the graphics and the fact that it's not as bad as Call of Duty.    … Expand
  52. malv83
    Jan 4, 2015
    2
    An incoherent mess of a game.

    The Good: Graphics (when on high) The bad: Everything else Spawn system: Enemies materialize off on their squad leaders when being engaged. Enemies materialize on points under capture at random areas. Enemies spawn out of the sky from choppers and fall down onto points. There is no semblance of a frontline. Enemies can be anywhere at any time very    An incoherent mess of a game.

    The Good: Graphics (when on high)

    The bad: Everything else

    Spawn system: Enemies materialize off on their squad leaders when being engaged. Enemies materialize on points under capture at random areas. Enemies spawn out of the sky from choppers and fall down onto points. There is no semblance of a frontline. Enemies can be anywhere at any time very easily.

    Unlocks: Right off the bat you'll be playing against experienced players with access to better weapons and vehicle perks that completely dominate over the base guns/vehicle loadouts. Want to compete? Either be fodder for a few weeks and level up or pay to win by buying unlocks outright. Merit counts for very little in this game. It doesn't matter if you are an experienced, team oriented FPS gamer with a working microphone and a will to work with other players.... it counts for nothing in this game.

    Maps: Small. Lots of geometry which makes it difficult to spot enemies on the lower non anti-aliased detail settings. No real choke points. Lots of maps with many stupid high sniper points which basically ensures that you will often get killed from very high unexpected. Due to the spawn system, and the large number of entrances on every capture point, you'll have enemies coming at you from every direction and there is little you can do to play defensively to hold a point. It's Unreal Tournament deathmatch with capture points.

    Vehicles: All vehicles feel weak and underpowered without the unlocks. The way the choppers fly is a definite downgrade from BF2. Not agile one bit. Planes dominate and spawn frequently.

    Damage system: Baffling... to say the least. Once again unlocks have far better handling than the default weapons and are overall more effective. Guns seem to either be grossly overpowered or underpowered.

    As an original fan of the BF1942 and BF2, I find this game to be truly a piece of crap. It is an insufferable cash-grab. It has turned a once merit-driven team-based FPS into a pay-to-win clusterfu__ sh__fest with absolutely no redemable qualities. The type of game design you would expect to see on a free-to-play cell phone game and not on a $50 game that requires an expensive machine to play.

    Utter... complete... sh**. A disgrace to the team-based FPS genre. Par the course for EA Games published title.    … Expand
  53. Preator
    Nov 4, 2013
    1
    CRASH BUG CRASH.... Almost every game there will be a random crash-disconnect... official forum is full of techical issues posts... it is an unfinished-unpolished game... sold early to get money but people can't play it... DISAPPOINTING....
  54. 0235
    Jan 24, 2015
    0
    What can i say. i was booted from a single player game because my internet connection went down. are you having a laugh EA. SINGLE player. even if you are collecting data and metrics don't boot me because my connection went down. I wonder if they realise that the internet does not equal test LAN servers they operate in there dev studio.
  55. redpanda751
    Feb 13, 2014
    0
    this game doesn't even deserve a 1.

    Games should be about having fun and this game clearly prevents you from having any. Going from BF3 in its fixed state to BF4 has been a nightmare. I went from averaging 4.3 KDR to a mere 1.6. I record all my matches and realized that the problem was due to the game. The game has HORRID hit detection and netcode is at its worst. I empty full    this game doesn't even deserve a 1.

    Games should be about having fun and this game clearly prevents you from having any.

    Going from BF3 in its fixed state to BF4 has been a nightmare. I went from averaging 4.3 KDR to a mere 1.6.

    I record all my matches and realized that the problem was due to the game. The game has HORRID hit detection and netcode is at its worst. I empty full mags on enemies with their backs facing me and there are many hit marks on the crosshair. Yet they take 0 damage, turn around and instant kills me quite often.

    I wouldn't have a problem if BF3 was still alive and kicking. However, only 2 servers that ever show up on Battlelog for BF3 and it really **** everything up.

    I instead tried out some other FPS's like CS:GO and even TF2 and realized how much more fluid and crisp the gameplay was. None of this uncertainty of netcode and hit registration.

    This literally **** up the battlefield franchise for me because there is no good battlefield to play atm with people playing in them.    … Expand
  56. KingMob4313
    Mar 30, 2014
    2
    Another incomplete release from Electronic Arts.

    Five months later and the game is still unplayable. First start with constant driver interaction issues that hit around 60% of the player base and cause crash-to-desktop at best and hard locks of the OS at worst. Then, when the game works, players are dealing with bewildering hit box issues, lag and lag compensation absurdity where    Another incomplete release from Electronic Arts.

    Five months later and the game is still unplayable. First start with constant driver interaction issues that hit around 60% of the player base and cause crash-to-desktop at best and hard locks of the OS at worst.

    Then, when the game works, players are dealing with bewildering hit box issues, lag and lag compensation absurdity where players suddenly rubberband and sling about the map, and crippling balance issues all culminated to make this game unplayable from day one and still hound the game to this day.

    Absolutely embarrassing release for DICE and EA.    … Expand
  57. Sirik_Matak
    Dec 28, 2015
    1
    Dear God, how **** awful nowadays multiplayer FPS are.
    My last true multiplayer FPS experience was with UT2k4. After that, seeing how awful Call of Duty was, I gave up on online gameplay. This Christmas however, I saw Battlefield 4 on sale, the title everyone I asked about masturbates on, and decided to give it a try.
    Jesus **** Christ. I cannot even comprehend how **** awful multiplayer    Dear God, how **** awful nowadays multiplayer FPS are.
    My last true multiplayer FPS experience was with UT2k4. After that, seeing how awful Call of Duty was, I gave up on online gameplay. This Christmas however, I saw Battlefield 4 on sale, the title everyone I asked about masturbates on, and decided to give it a try.
    Jesus **** Christ. I cannot even comprehend how **** awful multiplayer in this game is. I could write dozens of pages of how **** bad this game is and why, but truth to be told, it all boils down to absolutely **** **** this game's gameplay is. This is the right word: the ****. Remember BF1942? Well, it's everything upside down in here. People spawning everywhere, falling on cap zones, atrociously bad hitboxes and what retards love the most: a **** of irrelevant crap on the screen, medals, badges, unlockables! Play 1000 hours to unlock that awesome skin or a dogtag! If the gameplay is about RNG killing/getting killed at the moment of spawning, delude yourself with that another tasty Super Seargant of Cool badge! Run around doing nothing and get 10000 points! Try to play with others - get stomped by a camper that spawned behind your zones in tasteless, designless levels!

    I feel dirty after playing it for few days. Unfortunately it's too late to get a refund.

    But, holy **** how bad this game is. Guess it's time to get back with LAN Quake 3 parties.    … Expand
  58. DE4D
    Mar 26, 2014
    1
    Dice is dumb, fk you ea.. game is so fking broken.. everyone is blaming EA for pushing the game but the game has been released for more than 3months and dice can't fix small stuff.. look at killcam seriously it's so easy to fix but they can't... Monkies > dice devs
  59. drschuster555
    Apr 14, 2014
    1
    Another great example, that EA is a money-grubbing company. They have taken BF3, have done a 1.5 hours singleplayer-campaign which has 5% Gameplay 15% Bugs and 80% Script Sequences, then they have taken the old Frostbite-Engine and have integrated 2 new codes in it, then they have copied the old multiplayer (only bugs and a few maps were added). At the end they have placed it in theAnother great example, that EA is a money-grubbing company. They have taken BF3, have done a 1.5 hours singleplayer-campaign which has 5% Gameplay 15% Bugs and 80% Script Sequences, then they have taken the old Frostbite-Engine and have integrated 2 new codes in it, then they have copied the old multiplayer (only bugs and a few maps were added). At the end they have placed it in the market. I pay 60€ for the game (Yes i am european) and then 60€ for Premium. And then 80€ for "new" (Day One....or two) DLCS. Wonderful.

    Sorry for translation errors.    … Expand
  60. Greg_K
    Jan 14, 2014
    0
    Battlefield 4 would be a step forward in the area of gameplay and graphics if there were no gameplay killing bugs, but there is plenty of them.
    A huge percentage of servers which ran Battlefield 3 with no issues now crash often and fail to work properly in many cases. There are also many issues with the PC client.
    Overall, it seems to be an unfinished game which was released early in    Battlefield 4 would be a step forward in the area of gameplay and graphics if there were no gameplay killing bugs, but there is plenty of them.
    A huge percentage of servers which ran Battlefield 3 with no issues now crash often and fail to work properly in many cases. There are also many issues with the PC client.

    Overall, it seems to be an unfinished game which was released early in order to compete with Activision's Call of Duty: Ghosts.
    They even made the release cycle shorter, since the next installment will be released in autumn 2014 and not two years later as it was with Battlefield 3 and Bad Company 2.    … Expand
  61. sk1e
    Nov 4, 2013
    1
    Another broken project released by big companies. Game crashes all the time. Net code is terrible. And developers already talking about DLCs. Aside from that bad map design for many game modes.
  62. getcarter4joe
    Nov 4, 2013
    0
    Don't buy it yet. Game issues won't be sorted till at-least January. Its an absolute mess right now.
    Bullet hitreg is more miss than hit, the game is poorly optimized for all but the most powerful graphics cards.
    It crashes all the time and will frustrate you with its many bugs and lack of polish. Stay away until a good few months of patches have been applied!
  63. originalowen
    Nov 6, 2013
    0
    This is a good game, but i have a 50% quit rate because of the awesome bugs that kick you from servers. If this many people are having problems then don't release the game. Make sure it works first. My guess is that EA wants to win the worst company in the US for the third year in a row though, so they are just making sure that we vote for them.
  64. Hiixx
    Nov 16, 2013
    0
    An unstable bug filled mess. No time was spent for Q/A and the product was released unfinished. I have yet to finish a match without the game or, worse, server crashing. When the server crashes you lose ALL progress. Highly advise to stay away for at least several months when they finally patch this game.
  65. TheLurkingKing
    Jan 5, 2014
    0
    This game should be called "Battlefield 3: This Version Crashes A Lot Edition", it is literally Battlefield 3, but with way more bugs and crashes. The game crashes on the singleplayer mode, on the multiplayer and sometimes at the menu. The new features are forgettable, the commander sounds cool in theory... but it doesn't work in game, because nobody will give a f*ck to what you are sayingThis game should be called "Battlefield 3: This Version Crashes A Lot Edition", it is literally Battlefield 3, but with way more bugs and crashes. The game crashes on the singleplayer mode, on the multiplayer and sometimes at the menu. The new features are forgettable, the commander sounds cool in theory... but it doesn't work in game, because nobody will give a f*ck to what you are saying to them to do. Avoid this.… Expand
  66. total
    Jan 27, 2014
    4
    They mucked it up. endless amount of bugs, glitches and most important the crashing. They might have fixed it by know but I was burned too hard. This game has killed the series for me. This was even more of a muck up then Total War Rome 2 some how.
  67. sonic125
    Jan 26, 2014
    0
    For players looking for Rush gameplay, this BF4 is a sore disappointment.but if EA give us battlefield 2 and 3 with i will buy itseeming more like the Armored Kill and End Game maps. There are no maps like Grand Bazar, Seine or Aftermath.

    There are serious problems with the spawn on the defensive team of a few maps, resulting in many instant kills after spawn.
  68. FatSeal
    Jan 28, 2014
    1
    I was so excited when BF 4 's lunch trailer came out. And I thought I must pre-order this game.
    And it finally came out,I was angry that game has so many errors. graphic of this game cool but,
    It is only good thing of this game.

    Single play was so boring...and Multiplay was more bad than singleplay.

    BF 3 is better than is game...
  69. Ravidleo
    Jan 28, 2014
    0
    hate that game. just hate it such a lame gameplay, and the bugs, oh the bugs.
    if you're looking for a game that will make you rage quit, or quit itself because of the bugs than that the game for you, anouter typical game of EA.
    pure s**t.
  70. Bigass
    Feb 4, 2014
    0
    this is the worst game you could do in the genre of shooter
    Dice spat in the face of gamers doing the worst in the history of the series battlefild
    i hate this game
  71. grafae
    Feb 7, 2014
    1
    Yawn. This pointless 'update' puts sadly puts the previously respectable Battlefield series firmly in the 'Call of Duty camp'. I played the single player a couple of months back and already can barely remember it.
  72. deweee
    Jan 16, 2015
    0
    This is the worst multiplayer FPS game I have ever played. Gameplay is just random, arcade-ish, buggy as hell (even in 2015), has bad netcode, full of hackers, bad maps = DICE. Need to say more?
  73. Dodger109
    Apr 4, 2015
    0
    do not buy !!! very poor re spawn policy . Magnum bullets don't have any special effect you cannot turn off the morons easily who insist you listen to their music and their kids in the background. And the enemy spawn right behind you
  74. Salvo623
    Nov 3, 2013
    0
    here is the campaign in a nut shell

    Aim and shoot at the head at medium range= Enemy killed Spray and Pray multiple kills, and head-shot's Melee an enemy with a corner, debris, or a wall anywhere close to you, melee doesn't connect get crushed by a car swimming to shore easily shoot an RPG within 5m of an enemy nothing, apparently explosions that close to people have no effect.    here is the campaign in a nut shell

    Aim and shoot at the head at medium range= Enemy killed
    Spray and Pray multiple kills, and head-shot's
    Melee an enemy with a corner, debris, or a wall anywhere close to you, melee doesn't connect
    get crushed by a car swimming to shore easily
    shoot an RPG within 5m of an enemy nothing, apparently explosions that close to people have no effect.
    Believe that EA can pull out a great game based on testimonials and trailers Disappointment, broken multi player, and no given by EA    … Expand
  75. LordCrc
    Nov 10, 2013
    3
    Battlefield 4 promises so much. Sadly, Battlefield 4 is like a gourmet meal spoiled by the chef pouring vinegar over the entire dish.

    The graphics is much better than Battlefield 3, and finally the maps aren't just 50 shades of blue. Sound is still in a class of it's own. DICE has reintroduced Commander mode, squad leaders aren't a joke, and a commo rose that works. Changes to the    Battlefield 4 promises so much. Sadly, Battlefield 4 is like a gourmet meal spoiled by the chef pouring vinegar over the entire dish.

    The graphics is much better than Battlefield 3, and finally the maps aren't just 50 shades of blue. Sound is still in a class of it's own. DICE has reintroduced Commander mode, squad leaders aren't a joke, and a commo rose that works. Changes to the server listing in Battelog means it's quite feasible to run settings close to classic Battlefield without having issues with filling it up.

    So on paper, there's a lot to look forward to. But both single player and multiplayer are almost completely ruined by a few but very important core issues. Note I do not mention co-op because Battlefield 4 has no co-op, a surprising and sad move in my opinion.

    In the case of the single player it's the story. Sure it's a corridor shooter, but even those can be interesting if the story is good, for example like Spec Ops: The Line or Medal of Honor (2010). While the story in Battlefield 4 isn't as bad as in Battlefield 3, it is not a whole lot better. It contains a handful of bland characters doing things that make no sense, with tons of boring cut scenes and highly predictable plot devices. By trying to make the story as "epic" as possible DICE has completely lost sight of what makes a good and engaging story. In the end the single player is a boring interactive movie which you grudgingly grind through just to unlock a few weapons for the multiplayer.

    Now, singleplayer is one thing, but what keeps people player Battlefield has always been it's multiplayer. With gorgeous visuals, rich and engaging sound scape it's hard not to be impressed, even after playing Battlefield 3. However there are a couple of things which are essential to a good multiplayer shooter, and as Team Fortress 2 shows, it's not super-realistic graphics.

    The basics are gun play and netcode. Sadly Battlefield 4 fails miserably in both categories. First, the direction the bullets travel and the direction the barrel is pointing are just vaguely correlated in Battlefield 4. Players who are good at controlling the recoil and keeping the aim on target will be punished. Snipers who are quick to react and get the crosshairs back on target will miss. This creates a serious disconnect with the weapons. Add the toned-back-but-still-present suppression effect and you often find yourself thinking you're shooting blanks.

    Worse is the netcode. DICE has finally come out and said that improving the netcode is a high priority for them. However the issues that plagues Battlefield 4 has consistently plagued Frostbite games since Bad Company 2. They've had 4 PC shooters using the Frostbite engine with the exact same issues. In my view the most frustrating issues are client-side hit detection and broken chronology, meaning you get hit and die from someone you haven't seen shooting yet, who is pointing a completely different direction or is behind a wall. They are somewhat intertwined, but Bad Company 2 had chronology issues yet with server-side hit detection.

    The netcode issues affects vehicles as well. Lock-on warnings which sound immediately before the rocket hits, etc.

    With the absolutely fundamental issues more or less completely broken, it's a real struggle to have any fun playing multiplayer. If you just want to sit on a hill, have a few beers and take potshots at the enemy running around some flag then it's not half bad. But it is very far away from being a serious shooter.

    Which is sad in a way, as one easily senses there's a lot one could like about Battlefield 4 had it not had vinegar all over it.    … Expand
  76. hssh
    Nov 24, 2013
    1
    This is the best "Error message simulator game out there", no but please don`t buy this game, there are glitches and bugs all over the place. if you are going to buy it, wait
  77. Harlotsmouth
    Nov 4, 2013
    1
    This is by far the biggest disappointment all year, the released a unfinished game with massive server lag, random disconnect from server, and to top it off its just battlefield 3 with water combat. Not only is this game way over hyped they tack on a 60 dollar premium like ever other game has done in the trend. I don't know whats worst free-2-play games or Video games with premiums. IThis is by far the biggest disappointment all year, the released a unfinished game with massive server lag, random disconnect from server, and to top it off its just battlefield 3 with water combat. Not only is this game way over hyped they tack on a 60 dollar premium like ever other game has done in the trend. I don't know whats worst free-2-play games or Video games with premiums. I thought mass effect 3, and Bioshock infinite was a big let down but by far this take the cake. nothing worst then aiming at someones head and unloading a whole clip into it, only to realize your both dead nice job dice this will be the last game I buy with your name slapped on it, its just a company trying to compete with the call of duty franchise of how big of a game can i release.… Expand
  78. andree1991
    Nov 3, 2013
    0
    Crap game, nothing but a sad cash in by the suits at EA who don't care about games. And you can tell all those nice reviews are all paid by EA when most of the USER reviews here are showing that theyre not happy with the game anyway, it is boring and the campaign is so dull and short, i can't believe battlefield games are just going backwards everytime a new one comes out, i want my money back
  79. th3-0nly-1337
    Jun 15, 2014
    1
    Probably the worst battlefield I've ever bought. Videos shown while loading levels in SP stutter to the point of unviewable. In MP, gameplay mechanics are unresponsive, laggy, and unbalanced, even 8 months after release, BF3 plays a lot better than BF4. I'm going back to playing BF3, arguably the last good recent BF.
  80. AustinDM
    Nov 4, 2013
    0
    Crap game, nothing but a sad cash in by the suits at EA who don't care about games. And you can tell all those nice reviews are all paid by EA when most of the USER reviews here are showing that theyre not happy with the game anyway, it is boring and the campaign is so dull and short, i can't believe battlefield games are just going backwards everytime a new one comes out, i want my money back
  81. Dav_Golf
    Nov 3, 2013
    4
    A sore disappointment in the series. While this game still has potential of surpassing Battlefield 3. It fails by a long-shot. Call me a hater. I played every Battlefield game and loved every moment of each one. But this game is not Battlefield. With bugs ranging from connection problems, graphical errors (during the first few days my game looked like a colorful mess), spawning is horridA sore disappointment in the series. While this game still has potential of surpassing Battlefield 3. It fails by a long-shot. Call me a hater. I played every Battlefield game and loved every moment of each one. But this game is not Battlefield. With bugs ranging from connection problems, graphical errors (during the first few days my game looked like a colorful mess), spawning is horrid on almost every map (I get sniped instantly), I cant even load into a Conquest or Rush server because the load times are so long that I just get disconnected due to a map change. Forcing me to play TDM or other smaller map gamemodes. Anyone who says this game is great from the start is completely wrong. I could compare this start to SimCity. (Yeah that bad) I wasnt even able to play the campaign for 5 minutes without crashing. I even lowered my settings to lowest, and Im only able to get an extra 10 minutes of gameplay.

    Although this game does have potential. I am severely disappointed in DICE and EA for pushing this game out to early. It needs more time for development. No one should buy this game at its current state.    … Expand
  82. Thatguy96
    Nov 4, 2013
    0
    Wow dice ,this time you did sure manage to rustle my jimmies to the max. As a veteran player since Battlefield 1942 i can only say that the game is aiming towards COD game play mechanics, of course the levolution and great ammount of customizations might really attract people while people like me will avoid the product at all costs seeing how much of a disaster it is compared to otherWow dice ,this time you did sure manage to rustle my jimmies to the max. As a veteran player since Battlefield 1942 i can only say that the game is aiming towards COD game play mechanics, of course the levolution and great ammount of customizations might really attract people while people like me will avoid the product at all costs seeing how much of a disaster it is compared to other battlefield series.

    We all know that battlefield has a great history of awful campaigns ,but this one is just absolutely empty. The plot is really uninteresting, even though it tries to give us a brief overview of characters the game ends too soon to make us feel anything for them. Story has to show all vehicles (air/ground/water) not just few of them and it really lacks freedom in game play ,i mean really its battlefield series after all so i would at least expect possibility to change story path by choosing my own actions The end mission decision really does not count). But never mind the story mode ,lets talk about the diamond of the battlefield series.

    The Multiplayer. Oh my god ,the multiplayer. I will not lie ,i did have some fun playing it ,but i could as well say that i did have some fun playing call of duty for 30 minutes and threw it in my games box afterwards. We all know about these common pc crashes (applies to single player too) and disconnects that seriously hurt when you are having a clan match, these problems SHOULD NOT EXIST, as the beta was absolute disaster we should at least expect technical improvement after so much torture, but no ,it really feels like the focus of all time was the consoles even though the game plays nearly as awful. A personal issue for me would be the sniper class, in hardcore mode they are absolute quick scope master class ,i am saying that because i tried the class and i got 300 kills in about 6 hardcore matches. We all know that at the moment air rules the battlefield as the ground vehicles were nerfed while air was powered up to the max ,you can dominate the battlefield without any unlocks.

    I will give this game a 0 ,not because it is that awful ,but because the Dev's did not put effort in the things that make battlefield play like BATTLEFIELD. I am really disappointed, because i spent around 600$ to improve my pc so i could run the game flawlessly ,while it really doesn't show any features that should require such expensive gear.

    I love battlefield series and i will not tolerate if this game gets destroyed because of devs focus towards unecessary features instead of what the game really is about.    … Expand
  83. unpronounceable
    Mar 12, 2015
    0
    One of the absolute worst games I've ever had the displeasure of playing.
    This isn't something I say lightly, as I've been a fan of this series and of DICE since Battlefield 2.
    This has to be their worst offering yet. The maps have no flow and it is entirely impossible to predict where your enemy will come from. No matter how quick you are with your gun, if the enemy always shows up    One of the absolute worst games I've ever had the displeasure of playing.
    This isn't something I say lightly, as I've been a fan of this series and of DICE since Battlefield 2.
    This has to be their worst offering yet.

    The maps have no flow and it is entirely impossible to predict where your enemy will come from.
    No matter how quick you are with your gun, if the enemy always shows up behind you there is no tactical element to speak of.
    In Battlefield 3, the previous game in the series, even losing a match was a lot of fun.
    In Battlefield 4, there is not a minute of enjoyment to be had, win or lose.

    The specialization mechanic is frustrating, causing you to have too little ammo until you reach the mandatory number of squad paddy cakes.
    Because the upgrade paths are already set, there is no way to have both extra rockets and extra ammo for the engineer class, causing you to either run out of your ability to defeat tanks or run out of your ability to fight infantry.
    The gadgets are designed to be frustrating and involve no tactics or skills.
    The UCAV in particular comes to mind.

    Do not pick up this game.
    I would go even further and suggest that you should not buy any more games designed by DICE until they've proven themselves to be worth the money and your trust.
    The trajectory of DICE shown by Battlefield 4 is a truly unfortunate one indeed.    … Expand
  84. Bobbydylan
    Jan 8, 2014
    4
    The game is so very close to being a great game. Sooooo very very close.

    However it falls short. Nothing is more frustrating in a competitive game than unfair playing conditions. Being killed behind cover, being one-shotted by people who weren't even facing you, being killed by "bad luck" for nothing, Terrible collision detection, game crashing bugs, and unbalanced assets. This game    The game is so very close to being a great game. Sooooo very very close.

    However it falls short. Nothing is more frustrating in a competitive game than unfair playing conditions. Being killed behind cover, being one-shotted by people who weren't even facing you, being killed by "bad luck" for nothing, Terrible collision detection, game crashing bugs, and unbalanced assets.

    This game is a shambles. In fact, it's interesting proof of just how out of touch professional reviewers are with the rest of the gaming community.    … Expand
  85. Velqirax
    Dec 29, 2013
    2
    In simple words, -Campaign mode: MEDIOCRE. The equivalent of MOH Warfighter, graphics not a wow factor but not impressive also, the plot is devastatingly disappointing and unrealistic. Too short,plain,dumb, is "foolproof" and not recommended to serious gamers specially mature experienced FPS gamers. Is a total joke, I prefer to be insulted for free rather than wasting my time. NotIn simple words, -Campaign mode: MEDIOCRE. The equivalent of MOH Warfighter, graphics not a wow factor but not impressive also, the plot is devastatingly disappointing and unrealistic. Too short,plain,dumb, is "foolproof" and not recommended to serious gamers specially mature experienced FPS gamers. Is a total joke, I prefer to be insulted for free rather than wasting my time. Not deserving further comments on this lackluster game mode.

    -Multiplayer: Is the same but online and sometimes with 64/32 players, totally disappointing, a waste of money to a FPS fan. If you were expecting Rush mode to be better you were wrong, maps are designed to the childish and amateur FPS full of vehicles, and unrealistic "realistic levolution mode" (only some maps btw) Graphically has some details taken care of, mostly in environment and vehicle details.
    LAG, is awesome If there were so much trouble at BF3, in BF 4 is worse and horrible managed it has to be fixed asap.

    Finally if you are looking for a nice and strategy based FPS you can always buy BF3, BF4 is the next generation of "call of duty multiplayer full of amateur/childish" kinda game. Do not waste your money and time this game is poor, amateurish, full of lag and nothing remarkable new just another "pop corn" over-advertised product, good luck, and see you on The real Battlefield at Battlefield 3.    … Expand
  86. ZloiHasan
    Jan 15, 2014
    0
    this game is incomplete f*ckg pre alpha! only glitсhes, bugs, unplayable piece of **** and it costs 100 eu?
    This game should be done at least a year more.
  87. huFFy
    Nov 13, 2013
    0
    DO NOT BUY!

    Unless you plan on dishing out an extra $60 on top of your original purchase to support this terrible business model. Just like in Battlefield 3, after a few months you will be unable to find a server with 64 players that isn't running the new DLC maps. I feel robbed to have spent $60 on a game just to find out i am unable to play a 64 player server with decent ping a few    DO NOT BUY!

    Unless you plan on dishing out an extra $60 on top of your original purchase to support this terrible business model. Just like in Battlefield 3, after a few months you will be unable to find a server with 64 players that isn't running the new DLC maps. I feel robbed to have spent $60 on a game just to find out i am unable to play a 64 player server with decent ping a few months later without shelling out extra money to buy DLC maps.

    Please do not support companies that do business through DLC scams. Support companies that allow the community to make custom maps/mods themselves.

    P.S. Destruction is still a huge step back from Bad Company 2. So sad.... R.I.P Dice, Battlefield, Call of Duty, Halo and all the other franchises that were once good but ruined by DLC money scams.    … Expand
  88. Supervhizor
    Nov 25, 2013
    0
    DO NOT BUY!!! The multiplayer is plagued with extreme rubber banding and lag spikes every 30 seconds AT LEAST, even with a prefect connection. The audio loops and cuts out, and the game freezes once per map. The fact that DICE ignores this and gives the finger to all us gamers experiencing this broken game make me absolutely disgusted. So you know what DICE, you win screw you and yourDO NOT BUY!!! The multiplayer is plagued with extreme rubber banding and lag spikes every 30 seconds AT LEAST, even with a prefect connection. The audio loops and cuts out, and the game freezes once per map. The fact that DICE ignores this and gives the finger to all us gamers experiencing this broken game make me absolutely disgusted. So you know what DICE, you win screw you and your game, don't expect to get another purchase from me.… Expand
  89. CHSStarKiller
    Dec 4, 2013
    0
    I have read a lot of these reviews and have to say EA/DICE should start handing out refunds to people. I have been playing since Battlefield 2 and this is by far the worst product they have ever put out. They tried dressing shiit in great RPG graphics and calling it good, well they were wrong. Some things I have noticed.

    - Same bugs exist upon release that has been in every game    I have read a lot of these reviews and have to say EA/DICE should start handing out refunds to people. I have been playing since Battlefield 2 and this is by far the worst product they have ever put out. They tried dressing shiit in great RPG graphics and calling it good, well they were wrong. Some things I have noticed.

    - Same bugs exist upon release that has been in every game release. Glitches that manipulate leaderboards, repair bugs, one hit bugs, sound bugs. All have been in previous releases so why not expect they would be in a new one before releasing it.

    - AIRCRAFT- Stealth Aircraft. (1) Aircraft period take far to long to respawn. well over 3 minutes. If you like to fly you get autokicked for being idle. (2) Flares/ECM virtually useless. There is virtually no lockon warning before your sent to the ground in a fireball. (3) WAY TO MUCH AA. You can't go anywhere on a map without some form of AA shooting you down. In a combat situation missle reload times far to long. Decrease the time or make more of that weapon available such as BF2 had. (4) Stealth Aircraft has the worst gun site in the game I believe. U have barely a little dot in the hud that is hidden by the flight indicator making tracking virtually impossible. You have a better chance of hitting in an external view. Thats just the jets, lets go to a battlefield favorite!!

    The Helo's. In particular the
    - ATTACK HELO. Was an awsome model from games past. Little or no armor against any form of AA. And the gunner is as useless as its weapons seem to be. Guns, just as the Stealth Aircraft take far to long to reload. TV missles! Every Helo Pilots faveorite weapon to seat switch into has been nerfed so bad that it cant destroy a thing. And by a think I mean a fence. WTF!

    Any and ALL Armor is way overpowered. Have put 4 SMAW on target yielding mayby 50% damage. If that and trying to run and gun against that is crazy.

    Ok the Kits. Seems the the Assauly kit is WAY TO OVERPOWERED. One shot kills while using seem to be the motto in every server I go into. Weapons are overpowered compared to the other kits.

    Rarely get hit markers on anything. I Have put full clips into targets, many at close range and didnt get one hit marker yet one shot later im dead.

    Quite honestly I think I have finally gave in with this game. Ready to leave the gaming clan and quit playing altogether because of this game. Its frusterating going into a game that constantly crashes, or has more bugs than my backyard or all the horrible critiques and messages everywhere that DICE still wont fix the game. Instead they try to dress it up with a horrible DLC (China Rising) Addressed nothing, fixed nothing. You added a few new maps, a couple POS gadgets and think thats what we want?? Maps alone would be fine if you listened to the gaming community and fixed the game. I would really like all the money I have spent on this game from the Premium Membership to the Digital Deluxe version just refunded but that like hoping this game would be fixed is just a dream. Now while Im sure there will no doubt be a lot of Die Hard BF fans reading this, and I assure you I have been one since BF2 that they will say "Well, go play Call of Duty"! Ide say gladly. I have had all there games and they were tested right and release will little or no bugs. So DICE, take a page from their books. They obviously are doing something right. This game gets the lowest mark in history from me. Im ashamed to be a Battlefield fan after purchasing and playing this game.    … Expand
  90. FluphyBunny
    Dec 24, 2013
    1
    I have played all of the BF games from BF1942 and without a doubt this is the most disappointing. Simply put it is not finished. Crashes, glitches, unfinished parts of the maps are evident in every game you play. Its shocking that this game was ever released in its current state. New patches reintroduce previous bugs and the cycle of ineptitude continues.

    What makes it worse is the    I have played all of the BF games from BF1942 and without a doubt this is the most disappointing. Simply put it is not finished. Crashes, glitches, unfinished parts of the maps are evident in every game you play. Its shocking that this game was ever released in its current state. New patches reintroduce previous bugs and the cycle of ineptitude continues.

    What makes it worse is the bought for critic reviews which rarely mention the fact that the game is broke. Disgusting behavior. There is a good game in here somewhere, but I am increasingly doubtful that EA/Dice have the ability to fix it.    … Expand
  91. 12un
    Dec 28, 2013
    0
    I have been playing battlefield games since BF1942, never felt strongly enough to write a review on ANYTHING before but this game is not even worth the £27 i paid for it on offer! (for digital deluxe)

    Every new battlefield game released before this stepped up in quality ALOT from the previous one, this game has left me at a loss for words, all I can describe it as, at the moment is a    I have been playing battlefield games since BF1942, never felt strongly enough to write a review on ANYTHING before but this game is not even worth the £27 i paid for it on offer! (for digital deluxe)

    Every new battlefield game released before this stepped up in quality ALOT from the previous one, this game has left me at a loss for words, all I can describe it as, at the moment is a plastic, cheap, rip-off of battlefield, I seriously don't know what they've done.

    If your a 'battlefield' fan don't buy it, if you like throwing your money at these plastic piece's of crap like the COD series go ahead and play it but i'm installing BF3 again.    … Expand
  92. lumberjackminer
    Dec 31, 2013
    2
    Oh, EA and DICE have returned yet again to pile on another phase, and it obviously shows in their rushed 'release'. If you look at the trailers of BF4 or videos made by FPS Youtubers, do not be fooled. The graphics in this game are intense, but overused to the point there is almost nothing left in the game itself. On my computer, one slightly-above-average desktop PC, the game stuttersOh, EA and DICE have returned yet again to pile on another phase, and it obviously shows in their rushed 'release'. If you look at the trailers of BF4 or videos made by FPS Youtubers, do not be fooled. The graphics in this game are intense, but overused to the point there is almost nothing left in the game itself. On my computer, one slightly-above-average desktop PC, the game stutters and crashes far beyond the acceptable limit before frustration. Maps, which have yet to make anybody happy except the stereotypical expert player, in which huge open ranges allow for 110-rank players to sit and annihilate your entire team regardless of what part of the map you spawn in. Vehicles are now more overpowered and the lesser ones now made worse. Jets are now invincible, travel at the speed of light, and cannot be shot down by anything, and helicopters now require you to run away whenever you enter any open area because any engineer with two rockets in a rocket launcher can take YOUR ONE FLARE and reload faster. Tanks, previously effective anti-infantry vehicles, previously 'fair' in BF3, are now not even weak enough to be called a 'tank'. Several of the secondary more-powerful anti-tank mines will only disable movement. Anti-aircraft, a vehicle whose purpose was completely obliterated when people now use the heavy machine guns in order to mow down infantry, and end up camping in their spawn locations (which you cannot enter.) Alongside a whole other set of unbearable problems, like a rocket artillery you find campers hiding in spawns, can also take down piles of infantry. Tanks can now carry two different types of different, more advanced shells, both overpowered to the max. Anybody who likes BF3 (Or any previous) should take a big look before they purchase this game. Sixty dollars I would rather spend to have my house egged.

    DICE, EA, anyone, make this game more fun than frustrating and I'll feel better. Maybe a four.    … Expand
  93. Pesterer
    Jan 11, 2014
    0
    Wow. What can I say. This is the worst experience I have ever had with a game on any platform. So much potential wasted by bugs and connection issues. I have un-installed the game and Origin. I feel better. I've spent/lost $60 on dumber things so I'll just move on. In the future I will not be purchasing any Dice, EA, or Origin products. Ya, it's a loss for me when they have such coolWow. What can I say. This is the worst experience I have ever had with a game on any platform. So much potential wasted by bugs and connection issues. I have un-installed the game and Origin. I feel better. I've spent/lost $60 on dumber things so I'll just move on. In the future I will not be purchasing any Dice, EA, or Origin products. Ya, it's a loss for me when they have such cool titles...but I'd rather go without if this is the game play I can expect. Big disappointment. Big. Goodbye EA.… Expand
  94. Binbag
    Jan 11, 2014
    4
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Played the whole series and greatly enjoyed them all.......except this one.

    EA management have shown some serious contempt for their customers, because selling this game in its original state must have bordered on illegal. It just didn't do what it was supposed to...ie : play.

    After 3 months of constant updates and patches, its better (ie: It actually plays, most of the time), but there's still loads wrong or flawed within the game.

    Overall, BF4 is good looking when it works but the endless flaws are difficult to accept when you've paid a premium price, for a second rate game.

    I've played more many more enjoyable games that were free.    … Expand
  95. YaBoyBrody
    Jan 18, 2014
    4
    Honestly one of the biggest disappointments of 2013 for me. There are so many things wrong with this game that plague something that could have been very good with proper preparation. The amount of times I find myself instantly jumping 100 to 0 health is outrageous. Suppression was a good concept in Battlefield 3, and it returns edited. It is still, unfortunately, terrible. I haveHonestly one of the biggest disappointments of 2013 for me. There are so many things wrong with this game that plague something that could have been very good with proper preparation. The amount of times I find myself instantly jumping 100 to 0 health is outrageous. Suppression was a good concept in Battlefield 3, and it returns edited. It is still, unfortunately, terrible. I have lined up hundreds of shots with a carbine only to miss every shot because an enemy with a light machine gun fires one bullet near me. There is still a stupid amount of lag in servers, even with 30- ping, which to me is unacceptable. The game simply does not have a high enough server refresh rate, so what you see and what your enemies see are often different, resulting in the earlier mentioned instant health drop. Hitboxes actually fall behind players sometimes, so what should be a hit is sometimes displayed with no hitmarker, no damage, but blood from the enemy. This can be proven on the test range, which actually is nearly useless considering there are very few realistic situations available. By this I mean there are a few slow UAVs, a few motionless boats, and a couple buggies.

    Now for the campaign. There's really not much to say about the campaign because there is really not much to it. All it is is pointless cursing and shooting. There may have been a plot that I missed, but for the most part it could just be an interactive Michael Bay film. There are silly cutscenes, situations, you name it.

    The only way I would ever recommend this game to anyone is if its bugs are fixed entirely. The multiplayer has a good base, but EA just decided to rush another game out the door, creating possibly the biggest disappointment of 2013 for me personally. I had the intention to pre-order premium, but wow am I glad I didn't.    … Expand
  96. DevAlmighty
    Jan 18, 2014
    1
    To many bugs and netcode is awfull! Infantry fighting is only possible on one map (Operation locked), and its very common that both players kill eachother because of the netcode. It could be fun if the teams are even to use tanks or boat, but if they are not, you feel very helpless. Battlefield 3 and bad company 2 was actually much better games. Also there are to many "gadgets" in the gameTo many bugs and netcode is awfull! Infantry fighting is only possible on one map (Operation locked), and its very common that both players kill eachother because of the netcode. It could be fun if the teams are even to use tanks or boat, but if they are not, you feel very helpless. Battlefield 3 and bad company 2 was actually much better games. Also there are to many "gadgets" in the game so its very much RNG.… Expand
  97. SilkyNoah
    Jan 30, 2014
    4
    Same crappy singeplayer as BF3, multiplayer is decent when it works. The problems is that BF4 has lost almost all the character that made BF games so from from the start.
  98. will1956
    Feb 4, 2014
    0
    Pros: absolute brilliant graphics, large maps, brilliant single player campaign .
    Cons: it will kick me off before I finish ANY multiplayer game, annoying habit of flicking me around 180 degrees, randomly freezes, playing on a 8350/7870 ghz/ssd computer, so it is not the specs plus the single player campaign has no such problems ( will play Crysis 3 high res no problems)
  99. coua2308
    Feb 23, 2014
    0
    Great game if you like reading forums and updating stuff ! Game crashes every 5 minutes for absolutely no reason. I bought a brand new 1500$ computer to play this game and it is a total disappointment. Buy COD
  100. kolera
    Mar 3, 2014
    0
    This game is so awful. Remember that Simpsons-episode where Homer designs his own car? He throws in every feature he thinks people want and the result is an aberration of a car that only Bart Simpson thinks is cool. The Battlefield series is the gaming world's analogy to that car. In Battlefield, every opponent can be seen on the minimap and you can spawn anywhere you like. You can driveThis game is so awful. Remember that Simpsons-episode where Homer designs his own car? He throws in every feature he thinks people want and the result is an aberration of a car that only Bart Simpson thinks is cool. The Battlefield series is the gaming world's analogy to that car. In Battlefield, every opponent can be seen on the minimap and you can spawn anywhere you like. You can drive and fly any vehicle you like as there is rarely a lack of vehicles. The result is a very non-functional and chaotic game that makes all the ADHD, Bart Simpson-kids out there occupied, but even they seem to think "Battlefield sucks", if we are to judge from all the negative posts on the official forums. For everyone else, Battlefield is a game of dice - completely random.

    Stay away from Battlefield if you want a FPS that needs skills and has some meaning to it. It really is just an advanced COD-clone.    … Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

44
#44 Best PC Game of 2013
7
#7 Most Discussed PC Game of 2013
27
#27 Most Shared PC Game of 2013

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
81

Generally favorable reviews - based on 52 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 42 out of 52
  2. Mixed: 10 out of 52
  3. Negative: 0 out of 52
  1. Pelit (Finland)
    Mar 11, 2014
    91
    Battlefield 4 could just as well be called Battlefield 3.5. The new Battlefield features are only marginal improvements over Battlefield 3, but even as such it leaves the competitors way behind. Hopefully the bugs will be squashed soon. [Nov 2013]
  2. GameCritics
    Jan 13, 2014
    60
    Even if multiplayer wasn't buggy, Battlefield 4 would still only be a barely passable installment in all respects besides the snazzy graphics. EA and DICE played it safe by providing the same thing they did the last time around, with another phoned-in campaign and only minor alterations to the online.
    Read full review
  3. Level7.nu
    Jan 3, 2014
    60
    Battlefield 4 keeps soldiering on in the same footsteps as previous games in the series. The lack of worthwhile news makes you wish for more. Dice stays in its comfort zone calls for explosions and not much more. The series needs to evolve or fade out.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »