Battlefield 1

 PC
User Score
7.2

Mixed or average reviews- based on 2720 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1,719 out of 2720
  2. Mixed: 506 out of 2720
  3. Negative: 495 out of 2720
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. bar0yka
    Dec 27, 2022
    7
    stealt var biraz fazla ve son bölümü hayal kırıklığı ama grafikler efdane ve optimizasyon da çok güzel
  2. Axelle_1
    Sep 6, 2021
    7
    нуу типичный бф я бы поставил 5 но мне нравиться сеттинг 1мировой
  3. PassiveDre
    Dec 13, 2020
    7
    This game is pretty polished and entertaining! Battlefield 1 excels in making you feel like you were in World War 1. The guns and sounds are satisfying, the music was pretty ok, the campaign was, eh, it was fine. My biggest problem is the greedy microtransactions, it was pretty scummy that EA brought out microtransactions weeks after launch. I reccomend this game over Infinite Warfare butThis game is pretty polished and entertaining! Battlefield 1 excels in making you feel like you were in World War 1. The guns and sounds are satisfying, the music was pretty ok, the campaign was, eh, it was fine. My biggest problem is the greedy microtransactions, it was pretty scummy that EA brought out microtransactions weeks after launch. I reccomend this game over Infinite Warfare but not by much. 7/10… Expand
  4. samstrummer90
    Mar 5, 2022
    7
    LO PRIMERO Y MÁS IMPORTANTE: NO COMPRES JAMÁS ESTE JUEGO NI NINGÚN BATTLEFIELD POSTERIOR.

    EA se ríe de los usuarios permitiendo a los "cheaters" campar a sus anchas sólo para crear una comunidad tóxica y forzarnos a que compremos sus nuevos juegos a aquellos que aún queremos disfrutar de Battlefield 1. Aunque un server entero reporte, EA no hace nada. Y si bloqueas al "chetto" EA se    LO PRIMERO Y MÁS IMPORTANTE: NO COMPRES JAMÁS ESTE JUEGO NI NINGÚN BATTLEFIELD POSTERIOR.

    EA se ríe de los usuarios permitiendo a los "cheaters" campar a sus anchas sólo para crear una comunidad tóxica y forzarnos a que compremos sus nuevos juegos a aquellos que aún queremos disfrutar de Battlefield 1. Aunque un server entero reporte, EA no hace nada. Y si bloqueas al "chetto" EA se vuelve a reír de ti emparejándote de nuevo con él la siguiente vez que buscas partida. Vergonzoso. Si bloqueo a un jugador lo mínimo es que no tenga que volver a verlo en el juego. Por esta vergonzosa política unido a los micro pagos es por lo que no debemos comprar ningún producto con el sello de EA hasta que empiecen a valorar más a los jugadores y menos al dinero.

    En cuanto al juego, es entretenido porque no hay muchos juegos similares. Visualmente es bonito y sigue siéndolo en 2021. Pero es un juego muy mediocre. El juego está lleno de misiones absurdas que debes completar si quieres tener todas las medallas. Las misiones no requieren de ninguna habilidad y sólo consisten en "grindear" cosas como 1500 reanimaciones o destruir un coloso móvil con una Kolibri (WTF?). El armamento es absurdo e insultante, sin ningún realismo ni fidelidad histórica. Todos los ejércitos tienen acceso a todas las armas y vehículos además de que dentro del armamento encontramos prototipos y armamento irreal que convierten el campo de batalla en un conglomerado de gente corriendo mientras dispara ametralladoras automáticas. Todo muy WW1 oye. Además de incluir vehículos y armamento "cáncer" para "tryhards" que permiten hacer cosas como aparcar un vehículo fuera del mapa para bombardear a placer a los enemigos que aparecen en tu radar. Muy justo y equilibrado todo.

    En fin, que no lo compres. Que le den por saco a EA.    … Expand
  5. Lyronn
    Feb 9, 2021
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The only game I play in the Battlefield games is the first world war and it tells it beautifully, but not exactly because the whole story is not complete, but it can be taken lightly because it is a game.… Expand
  6. elefsar
    Apr 22, 2021
    7
    Kinda a mediocre game. Good graphics and game play but bad history processing.
  7. dastankz
    Jul 15, 2021
    7
    Длс жоқ-еш жерде. Ойын жақсы, бірақ алаяқтар, көптеген қымбат длс, компьютердегі кішкентай онлайн оны өлтірді. Жақсы античит және тарату длс онда онлайн еді жоғары және ойын болар еді тамаша мерген.
    Қару, техника және т. б. физикасы 910
    Атмосфера 1010 Саундтрек 1010 Ойын 1010 Онлайн 210    Длс жоқ-еш жерде. Ойын жақсы, бірақ алаяқтар, көптеген қымбат длс, компьютердегі кішкентай онлайн оны өлтірді. Жақсы античит және тарату длс онда онлайн еді жоғары және ойын болар еді тамаша мерген.
    Қару, техника және т. б. физикасы 910
    Атмосфера 1010
    Саундтрек 1010
    Ойын 1010
    Онлайн 210
  8. dikii_hohol
    Jun 6, 2021
    7
    дота 2 крекер дота 2 крекер дота 2 крекер дота 2 крекер дота 2 крекер дота 2 крекер
  9. petrkozak13
    Dec 15, 2022
    7
    Fine game and a nice change of time period for this franchize. I'd welcome better single-player campaign though.
  10. AgentLvi
    Dec 27, 2022
    7
    Decent game. The story is so --so, scoring is great, visual is amazing, the voice & sound is also amazing
  11. rotagen
    Jan 16, 2022
    7
    I'm not a fan of first person shooters, for some reason I can never really buy into being a soldier in a game and I'm more interested in machines, specifically planes and tanks.

    I've done a lot of searching but I cannot find the answer - does battlefield 1 give you any decent amount of content for driving tanks in tank sim fashion and using terrain as strategy? Thanks.
  12. FurkanKenshin
    Oct 15, 2022
    7
    In scenarios, we cannot experience the feeling of discovery by walking around beautifully designed maps. The game tries to get you to certain goals quickly. I finished all stories in 1 day. And it did not satisfy me in any way.

    But the game's storytelling is very good.
  13. parmesancheese
    Oct 15, 2022
    7
    Great game and good storyline, compelled by online mode though. Accurate and fun to play with friends
  14. Deniskamrda
    Aug 31, 2023
    7
    Как игра в принципе не плоха, но как и в каждой игре есть люди которые портят ощущения от игры. Это снайперы и скиловики, к скиловикам никаких вопросов не возникает так как гики которые не одну тысячу часов отыграли в батлу, а вот снайперы это действительно проблема, так как большинство карт открытые а не CQB (оно то и понятно первая мировая так то) то ты можешь просто не заметить блик иКак игра в принципе не плоха, но как и в каждой игре есть люди которые портят ощущения от игры. Это снайперы и скиловики, к скиловикам никаких вопросов не возникает так как гики которые не одну тысячу часов отыграли в батлу, а вот снайперы это действительно проблема, так как большинство карт открытые а не CQB (оно то и понятно первая мировая так то) то ты можешь просто не заметить блик и получить пулю в лоб. На данный момент я нашёл только два способа борьбы против снайперов это либо так же сидеть на краю карты с перескопом и высматривать блик, или же пулемёт шошА.
    А так игра не плоха 10 орущих турков из 10    … Expand
  15. Midyen
    Jun 15, 2023
    7
    Based on the gameplay, graphics, sound, content, and originality of the game, I will give it a rating of 7.
  16. kingzardoz
    Oct 23, 2016
    6
    Graphics and graphical options are 10/10, performance on nvidia 970 gtx is 10/10, sound is 10/10, netcode is 8/10

    Now to the bad stuff Game Modes: Every game mode except conquest and operations is 12v12... You have this great engine that is very well optimized with the capability of 32v32 but you're not using it? This brings me to my next point Custom Servers: Where are they? Why    Graphics and graphical options are 10/10, performance on nvidia 970 gtx is 10/10, sound is 10/10, netcode is 8/10

    Now to the bad stuff

    Game Modes: Every game mode except conquest and operations is 12v12... You have this great engine that is very well optimized with the capability of 32v32 but you're not using it? This brings me to my next point

    Custom Servers: Where are they? Why can't people host servers with custom features

    Stat tracking: Compared to BF3, stat tracking doesn't exist in BF1

    Gunplay: I have no idea what they were thinking with these guns, a perfect FPS shooter will strive to make every gun relevant for specific purposes, no gun should be good at everything and no gun should be absolute garbage with no reason for existing. In BF1 each class has 1 or 2 guns that are superior in 80% of all situations, the remaining guns are useless or frustrating. It's like they had 4 teams working on the weapons, each team not knowing what the other was doing until launch day, just horrible. I didn't play BF4 or Hardline so I don't know how far DICE has fallen since BFBC2 and BF3 but they are currently setting new lows in FPS gun mechanics.

    Team balancing: Where is it? Maybe its because it's release weekend, their ranking algos don't have enough data yet but I highly doubt it. Why are level 5's playing with level 40's? And no these are not God Tier level 5's, they are how do I use my medkit level 5's.

    RE-skin of Battlefront: If you love Battlefront you don't need to play this game, unless you really like WWII games that are skinned to look like WWI games.

    That pretty much covers it. There are some bugs but not nearly as many as Beta so I think they did a good job of cleaning up the game. Overall I hope they keep adding a lot of features to the game so I don't get bored and uninstall. I'm very happy I didn't purchase the game + DLC because these guns are going to get boring fast.    … Expand
  17. jeanphilt
    Dec 23, 2017
    6
    I'm a big fan of Battlefield but I don't like BF1 so far so I've asked for a refund, until I see the DLCs.
    People in my clan are already back to BF4.
    Here are a few cons : - The "Rock, paper, scissors" gun scheme has absolutely ruined the game : 64 players mandatory + automatic weapon high recoil don't help - Level progression is not rewarding (it should be more obvious when you    I'm a big fan of Battlefield but I don't like BF1 so far so I've asked for a refund, until I see the DLCs.
    People in my clan are already back to BF4.

    Here are a few cons :

    - The "Rock, paper, scissors" gun scheme has absolutely ruined the game : 64 players mandatory + automatic weapon high recoil don't help

    - Level progression is not rewarding (it should be more obvious when you level up, etc)

    - Boring slow tanks gameplay with limited visibility (same for boats, planes, even horses are not as fun as motorcycles in BF4)

    - No custom server at launch, then useless custom servers since admins can't change much

    - Most expansive game ever (160$ CAD for Game + Premium)

    - Too many bad maps, especially since tanks are boring : Suez, Fao Fortress, Sinai Desert

    - No real great maps (while Amiens and St. Quentin's Scar are OK)

    - Feels more like Battlefront 2 than BF5

    edit : 6 months later, I've played it for the free 10 hours, players population has dropped but it's still OK, the DLCs have been slowly released but they made a few improvements to the game that makes it a little better

    edit : 12 months later, the player population continued to drop, now only 25k on PC compared to 15k for BF4 currently, I wanted to try the new game mode Incursions (beta), waited for 10 minutes to get in a game but not enough player so I left then I come back and get a warning for "abandoning matches" ... come on EA ...    … Expand
  18. Kuarinofu
    Nov 6, 2016
    6
    + nice graphics
    + good atmosphere
    + some good maps
    + fun to play with friends
    + not infinite warfare

    - horrible solo experience
    - awful weapon balance
    - bad unlock system
    - no hardcore
    - worst menu interface ever created (PC version)
    - laggy/buggy at times
    - overpriced
  19. gizmo2501
    Nov 20, 2016
    6
    Rather overrated, sadly.

    The presentation is outstanding - graphics, sound - as to be expected by DICE now. However, the game is let down by the map design and the UI. Flags are so close together that this game feels more like COD than Battlefield. The maps - as seems to be the trend - are smaller than ever. Gone are the days of large BF2 and large-ish BF3 maps. Sinai Desert is    Rather overrated, sadly.

    The presentation is outstanding - graphics, sound - as to be expected by DICE now.

    However, the game is let down by the map design and the UI.

    Flags are so close together that this game feels more like COD than Battlefield. The maps - as seems to be the trend - are smaller than ever. Gone are the days of large BF2 and large-ish BF3 maps. Sinai Desert is meant to be a large map, but all the control points are so close, there is no point to the rest of the map. You can no longer stealth your way around the map to take a point as you WILL get seen from somewhere. I would love to see a stat for average time before death. this game is very much spawn, die, spawn, die, spawn, die. Many maps are Metro all over again.

    The UI is TERRIBLE. The main menu is awful. It take sages to spawn as you have to wait for the map to zoom out, centere itself, then choose where to spawn. Game selection is unclear.

    Further, DICE is listening to the loud few again by nerfing mortars when, if anything, they needed a buff. Supression is non-existent, as you can empty 100 rounds from a support gun at a sniper and they will headshot you without blinking.

    And, of course, bugs bugs bugs.    … Expand
  20. Klewer
    Nov 15, 2022
    6
    On the surface a pretty solid modern FPS. If you are fan of these type of games there is nothing wrong with it and has good enough gameplay. Where it falls down for me is the branding of it being a WW1 game when it's completely ahistorical and really just a WW2 game with some tweaking.
  21. Jorchking
    Nov 1, 2020
    6
    Un poco decepcionado. Desaprovecha mucho la temática de la Guerra Mundial con esa pésima decisión de historias distintas por fascículos.
    Puntos positivos:
    -Gran calidad sonora -Doblaje al español hispanoamericano en PC (Call of Duty siempre elimina ese doblaje en el port de PC en Steam) -En la campaña, no hay Eventos de Tiempo Rápido (QTE), algo que se valora mucho excluir. -Multijugador    Un poco decepcionado. Desaprovecha mucho la temática de la Guerra Mundial con esa pésima decisión de historias distintas por fascículos.
    Puntos positivos:
    -Gran calidad sonora -Doblaje al español hispanoamericano en PC (Call of Duty siempre elimina ese doblaje en el port de PC en Steam) -En la campaña, no hay Eventos de Tiempo Rápido (QTE), algo que se valora mucho excluir. -Multijugador activo. -Cargas rápidas y optimización excelente en PC.
    Puntos negativos:
    - Temática desperdiciada: Se tomó la decisión de poner 5 mini historias de 1 hora c/u que desaprovechan la temática de la Guerra Mundial, ya que cada una dura muy poco y no termina de tener inmersión. La campaña es cortísima y mediocre. Pésima decisión. -Cinemáticas a 30fps. -Imprecisión histórica y sobredimensionamiento de mujeres y negros, los hacen ver como si fueran casi igual en cantidad que los soldados más representativos. Pasa algo similar en Battlefield 5. Aquí la portada es un negro, en el 5 una mujer... Cuando las portadas deberían de ser del tipo de soldado más representativo (un blanco, y un nazi o ruso, respectivamente). Este es un error muy típico de la actualidad para imponer su agenda de "diversidad e igualdad", una falacia enorme. En el multijugador no te sorprendas si ves más afros o mujeres más que cualquier otro tipo de soldado.
    -Gráficas e interfaz que me hacen pensar que es más un Battlefront que un Battlefield. No me convenció a pesar de ser un gran salto gráfico.
    -Multijugador con poca variación de armas y mapas estándar muy sencillos. Retroceso respecto a Battlefield 4.

    En resumen: Battlefield 1 posee grandes saltos en lo sonoro y visual, y llegaba muy prometedor con la temática de Guerra Mundial pero que se queda en multijugador como, especialemente, el modo campaña donde desperdicia de manera categórica la temática de Guerra Mundial. Una temática con mucho potencial tirada a la basura, al igual que pasaría con Battlefield V. Gran parte de esa culpa es la introducción de personajes forzados, de querer imponer una agenda, y, sobre todo, de la pésima decisión de poner mini historias que no te terminan de llegar nunca, que son cortas y no tienen la inmersión necesaria como para exprimir la historia de la Guerra Mundial. He prejuzgado mucho al Call of Duty WWII, pero creo que aprovecha mucho mejor la temática de la Guerra Mundial que la combinación de Battlefield 1 y 5. Cualquier campaña de los últimos Call of Duty creo que es mejor que el modo historia de este juego.

    La nota es entre un 5 y 6, pero seré generoso y le daré un aprobado por los pelos.    … Expand
  22. valsaven
    Apr 7, 2020
    6
    > I rate only offline company. <

    Pros:
    * Good graphics
    * interesting World War I setting

    Cons:
    * Stories of heroes don't cling.
    * Terribly boring stealth missions.

    If you think that the Battlefield series can't have an interesting offline campaign, take a look at Battlefield: Bad Company.
  23. Talbis
    Oct 26, 2016
    6
    It's Battlefield. Again. World War I my ass... Automatic weapons... It's fun, but not unique. Buy it at a discount if you have to, as there's no difference between this and Battlefield 4. Unfortunate disappointment.
  24. Maksim47
    Jan 31, 2018
    6
    6/10 boring battlefield game. Used to be a BF fan back in the day. I don't like this version at all. Think twice before you buy.
  25. RustyJames
    Jan 31, 2021
    6
    Decent and enjoyable shooter, even now. Good single player stories. At least half of maps are pretty balanced and playable, and beautiful of course. Tanks and planes aren't OP. No SJW contents and way better than BF V and even BF4. Speed of the game is acceptable for most players. But cheaters, unbalanced teams and remaining maps, which is not playable make this game average and awful sometimes.
  26. BlueSmileyBE
    Dec 8, 2016
    6
    Battlefield 1 is fun at times, but the lack of team play is a shame.
    Battlefield has always been one of my favorite franchises, but I miss the real fun since DICE started to make games for the casual players (Battlefront, hmmmm?). The graphics, physics and sound effects are excellent, but the gameplay is poor.
  27. sherkborg
    Oct 22, 2016
    6
    Not impressed at all. After being serious annoyed with 'Butters', apples, butters, apples you really get to experience the game.

    The weapons lack depth, the gameplay lacks depth and honestly I enjoyed the launchs of the other battlefields much more then this one. The weapons seem poorly balanced, the squad system lacks usefulness and it honestly feels like a solo multiplayer game. Its a    Not impressed at all. After being serious annoyed with 'Butters', apples, butters, apples you really get to experience the game.

    The weapons lack depth, the gameplay lacks depth and honestly I enjoyed the launchs of the other battlefields much more then this one. The weapons seem poorly balanced, the squad system lacks usefulness and it honestly feels like a solo multiplayer game. Its a weird sensation but I feel the game doesnt feel as interactive as the previous Battlefields. Its like everything is more picture then useable in the environment and the kill system is very unrewarding I feel. Overall I dont think this game is a great addition to this years game lineup.    … Expand
  28. TsukasaHiiragi
    Dec 1, 2017
    6
    As of 12/2/2017 review

    Pros: Engaging single player war stories which tell the horror, although fiction these stories could be pluasible considering how brutal World War 1 really was; the biggest problem I personally have is the fact the single player campaign is a measly 4 - 5 hours long which sends a clear message that EA doesn't care about single player. I think this could    As of 12/2/2017 review

    Pros:

    Engaging single player war stories which tell the horror, although fiction these stories could be pluasible considering how brutal World War 1 really was; the biggest problem I personally have is the fact the single player campaign is a measly 4 - 5 hours long which sends a clear message that EA doesn't care about single player.

    I think this could have been a really special single player experience if it actually was the length of a proper campaign. Some of the missions involving stealth, capturing points and infiltrating bases work exceptionally well, and are really fun to play - the shame is the fact there are so few of these its almost insulting and disappointing.

    Multiplayer, Loot crates for skins...roughly 90% of the playerbase has moved on to Battlefront 2 so unless you pick this up for free, or as part of the EA All Access program, then simply don't bother.    … Expand
  29. Karvahattu
    Dec 29, 2016
    6
    It's ok but not good. This BF1 is only for PS4 and XBOX1 not for pc. Too much arcade. Maybe these games are only for those funnyboxes and not anymore pc-gamers.
  30. Prais1980
    Oct 22, 2016
    6
    I want to write a huge Review, but i want to make it very short, feels like a reskin of Star Wars battlefront...
    The Gunplay is the worst, the movement is weird and the mousemovement (in the open beta it was oookay, but still weird) is the worst i have seen in a shooter...
    This game is a totaly console port, you can even see the RB- and LB-Buttonicons on top of the menus... DICE shame    I want to write a huge Review, but i want to make it very short, feels like a reskin of Star Wars battlefront...
    The Gunplay is the worst, the movement is weird and the mousemovement (in the open beta it was oookay, but still weird) is the worst i have seen in a shooter...
    This game is a totaly console port, you can even see the RB- and LB-Buttonicons on top of the menus...
    DICE shame on you! Bad Company 2 was epic, Battlefield 3 was great, Battlefield 4 was okay, but Star Wars battlefront and now Battlefield 1 are the worst BF-Games i have ever played...
    Buy a cheap key if you want but you will notice a LOT of cheater, the only anti-cheating is Fairfight and it still bans people, but if you google about a hack, you will see there already Fairfight proof hacks...they just cost money.
    Battlefield RIP    … Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

11
#11 Best PC Game of 2016
5
#5 Most Discussed PC Game of 2016
18
#18 Most Shared PC Game of 2016

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
88

Generally favorable reviews - based on 54 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 52 out of 54
  2. Mixed: 2 out of 54
  3. Negative: 0 out of 54
  1. PC PowerPlay
    Dec 18, 2016
    80
    Has DICE made the Great War Great again? Well, it's certainly delivered a fresh-feeling shooter in a very saturated market. But the missing modes are felt. [Issue#257, p.58]
  2. Edge Magazine
    Dec 14, 2016
    90
    Battlefield 1 is better than its predecessors in almost every way. [Christmas 2016, p.102]
  3. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Dec 12, 2016
    100
    Battlefield is back in shape and more so with fresh theme of the first Great War! After a long time, the campaign is successful and multiplayer is traditionally excellent. So, this year your choice is set! [Issue #269]
See all critic reviews »