- Publisher: Ubisoft
- Release Date: Nov 23, 2004
Buy Now
- Critic score
- Publication
- By date
-
The result is a much too traditional and predictable real-time strategy game.
-
This is a blunt bronze dagger to the shining steel halberd of "Rome: Total War." [Jan 2005, p.92]
-
BoomtownA few bugs here and there as well as some obvious yet simple features that seem to be missing add frustration to playing the game.
-
The lack of true strategic possibilities is a vast shortcoming when such high quality alternatives are on the shelves.
-
The enemy AI tends to be pathetically stupid. Whole garrisons of enemies stand around waiting for you to attack, and when you do they simply charge your men and chaos ensues.
-
Pelit (Finland)Not a very good game, although some battles can be quite impressive. Voice acting is simply horrendous, the game is riddled with bugs and has lots of annoying little things that creep up every now and again. [Feb. 05]
-
This conventional real-time strategy game attempts to follow Alexander the Great's campaign of conquest, but it is marred by sloppy development, factual inaccuracies, and a general failure to capture the scope of what made Alexander so interesting and unique to historians.
Awards & Rankings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 41 out of 53
-
Mixed: 6 out of 53
-
Negative: 6 out of 53
-
GeorgeV.Dec 7, 2005
-
Mar 10, 2022games out of politics, juegos fuera de la politica, jogos fora da polĂtica
-
SidB.Jun 21, 2005Alexander's Battles were great tactical and strategic victories, this game is a loser.