- Publisher: Ubisoft
- Release Date: Nov 23, 2004
Buy Now
- Critic score
- Publication
- By date
-
Broken gameplay, shoddy graphical and sound work, and terrible combat all combine to make this title a little more than bearable.
-
If you forget about the campaigns - and God knows, you're going to try and forget about the campaigns - the skirmish is an entirely competent example of its genre, and its inclusion enough to make this not actually an actively worthless game per se.
-
A generic click-fest with the occasional cutscene of Colin Farrell riding on a horse and the sounds of Vangelis blaring in the background. Ick.
-
Computer Gaming WorldWinning battles is more a result of mass and aggression than tactical coordination. [March 2005, p.76]
-
Alexander isn't a matter of taste; it's a matter of functional incapacity. If you're looking to get your fix in this historical period, there are plenty better and recent arrivals.
-
A mess, a hurriedly produced and lazily-designed RTS produced to cash in on gamers hoping to relive the film's stunning battles. Just make sure you're not one of them. [PC Zone]
-
Fans of historical RTS games will be far better off with Rome: Total War or any number of other, better alternatives. While nowhere near as awful as Heroes Hour, Alexander is nevertheless glitchy, and feels unfinished.
Awards & Rankings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 41 out of 53
-
Mixed: 6 out of 53
-
Negative: 6 out of 53
-
GeorgeV.Dec 7, 2005
-
Mar 10, 2022games out of politics, juegos fuera de la politica, jogos fora da polĂtica
-
SidB.Jun 21, 2005Alexander's Battles were great tactical and strategic victories, this game is a loser.