Season #: 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
User Score
8.2

Universal acclaim- based on 46 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 37 out of 46
  2. Negative: 5 out of 46
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Stream On
Buy on
Stream On

Review this tv show

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

User Reviews

  1. Dec 19, 2014
    10
    i sow it...its a really really great show..act and music is really good... it probley the best show ever on CW..and its much more beter than The vampire diares and su[ernatral and regin and any show on CW...in this show we have a many storis to see...and lot of action plan...
  2. Jul 19, 2015
    8
    I apologize, as I meant to give the show an 8 because of the better overall plot pacing and structuring if weighed against the first season. There were many weak, potentially drab links, but the skeletal frame work managed to hold, or rather stitch, everything together in a decent manner.

    Klaus remains to be a well-written and an audacious character with a vehement wild side; the moral
    I apologize, as I meant to give the show an 8 because of the better overall plot pacing and structuring if weighed against the first season. There were many weak, potentially drab links, but the skeletal frame work managed to hold, or rather stitch, everything together in a decent manner.

    Klaus remains to be a well-written and an audacious character with a vehement wild side; the moral implications of it are all over the place, and yet, I still cannot get enough of his character. I don't know what it is; it is elusive though. His character has depth, there shouldn't be any denials on this front, which is why morality seems to be the highlight from the opposition. However, moral compass and characterization should never mix as it's a volatile and an absurdly self-serving mixture. Which is why the moral ambiguity is serviceable here.

    Hence, I am appalled by some of the critics taking this route. It just opens a nice, wide window into this whole blogger-turned-critic routine some of the these folk have adopted, as it seems that they have never laid they eyes upon any decent - and real - critics' essays from the past. Given that characterization cannot be soldered to characters being 'good or bad' within this ridiculous and tightly formed moral compass some of the critics have created for themselves. The internet, silver-back critic warriors are so cool these days with their faster tongues - or fingers - and sluggish brains. I doubt we have seen the last of this stupidity.

    It would be helpful if they actually moved away from their key-boards and read (real) critical thought to spare us this colourful garbage called opinions. It's giving me a very big headache. It is just annoying to see creativity torn away from narrative and character psychology and the forceful moral inserts into this domain ... the presumptuousness of it all that seems to drive a common critic's petulance.
    Expand