Season #: 4, 3, 2, 1
Metascore
77

Generally favorable reviews - based on 30 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 27 out of 30
  2. Negative: 0 out of 30
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Stream On
Buy on

Critic Reviews

  1. Reviewed by: Jeff Korbelik
    Nov 16, 2015
    100
    This is one you will want to binge-watch. It’s a thrill ride from the onset.
  2. Reviewed by: Isaac Feldberg
    Nov 23, 2015
    90
    The first six episodes (all those provided to press ahead of release) consistently surprise in how they deepen those characters and weave their journeys together.
  3. Reviewed by: Tim Grierson
    Nov 19, 2015
    90
    A compulsively compelling series that grows richer and more emotionally nuanced as it gains momentum, The Man in the High Castle milks its provocative what-if premise for plenty of smart suspense and subtle shading.
  4. Reviewed by: Tirdad Derakhshani
    Nov 19, 2015
    90
    Epic in scale, gorgeous, and beautifully acted.
  5. Reviewed by: Mark Dawidziak
    Nov 16, 2015
    90
    Although some liberties have been taken with the characters and plot, it is an immediately intriguing, wonderfully textured realization of Dick's challenging book.
  6. Reviewed by: Robert Bianco
    Nov 19, 2015
    88
    Much of the six hours made available for preview centers on Juliana and Joe--and at times their story can drag. But the redeeming glory of Castle is the expansive world of characters it creates.
  7. Yes, this is chilling stuff. And provocative. It makes you ponder just how precious freedom really is and what kind of sacrifices you would make to maintain it.
  8. Reviewed by: Jeff Jensen
    Nov 12, 2015
    83
    It’s serious-minded sci-fi that’s stylish and strange and soulful, and only grows more rewarding over time.
  9. Reviewed by: Hank Stuever
    Sep 16, 2015
    83
    Although the writing and storytelling in first episode (which Amazon first shared with its Prime customers earlier this year) come off a little clumsily, overall it’s a fascinating launch for an espionage series. The Man in the High Castle is also expertly and realistically imagined.
  10. Reviewed by: Bruce Miller
    Nov 23, 2015
    80
    Directed by David Semel, the first episode (now available on Amazon) sets a visual tone that immediately sets this apart from other thrillers.... By the second episode, you’ll want to know who’s really good and who’s bad and how the latter will meet their untimely deaths.
  11. Reviewed by: David Sims
    Nov 20, 2015
    80
    On a macro-scale, the series is absorbing, but it takes a few episodes to settle into the smaller stories that are unfolding.
  12. 80
    What it delivers is something more along the lines of Boardwalk Empire, where the main draw is suspense and bursts of gunfire and torture, undergirded by the low-level dread that comes from not being able to trust most of the characters when they tell you who they are and what side they’re loyal to, and wondering when, not if, the other shoe will drop.
  13. Reviewed by: Matthew Gilbert
    Nov 19, 2015
    80
    These shortcomings [acting by Alexa Davalos, Rupert Evans, and story continuity] don’t ruin The Man in the High Castle, even if they prevent the drama from rising to a more rarified status. It’s a compelling addition to this year’s already long list of worthwhile TV shows.
  14. Reviewed by: Maureen Ryan
    Nov 18, 2015
    80
    The Man in the High Castle has a solid opening episode and gains weight and heft as it goes, in part due to fantastic world-building.
  15. Reviewed by: Ellen Gray
    Nov 18, 2015
    80
    The Man in the High Castle has no trouble building and maintaining tension. Honestly, it gave me nightmares. Missing, or at least muted a bit in the four episodes I've seen, though, was the sense I had from the book of how life, and even personality, could be shaped by occupation over time, rendering resistance less and less likely.
  16. Reviewed by: Brian Tallerico
    Nov 18, 2015
    80
    The Man in the High Castle can be a little cluttered in terms of narrative, but it’s the kind of challenging program that we haven’t received from Amazon and rarely even receive from Netflix.
  17. Reviewed by: Tim Goodman
    Nov 17, 2015
    80
    Even past the halfway point (Amazon made the first six episodes available to critics), The Man in the High Castle is still refreshingly intriguing and worth the investment.
  18. TV Guide Magazine
    Reviewed by: Matt Roush
    Nov 6, 2015
    80
    This subversive dark fantasy feels too real to ignore. [9-22 Nov 2015, p.13]
  19. Reviewed by: Alan Sepinwall
    Nov 19, 2015
    75
    The pacing is wobbly, and while the actors all seem period-appropriate (Davalos, whose previous series was TNT's '40s crime drama "Mob City," is a graceful acting time traveler), the only character who really comes to life as more than a functionary of the plot is one of Spotnitz's creations: Obergruppenführer John Smith (Rufus Sewell).... Still, the world itself is fascinating and fully-realized enough to compensate for the people who live there.
  20. Reviewed by: David Wiegand
    Nov 16, 2015
    75
    The show’s first episode sets the scene, but only hints at the richness of detail that informs future episodes. It’s not just that we learn things about the various characters we probably didn’t suspect at the outset: The genius of the series is how Spotnitz and his creative team carefully advance the thought-provoking thematic elements through stunning attention to detail.
  21. Reviewed by: Mary McNamara
    Nov 20, 2015
    70
    Spotnitz takes his time in all things, and the slow pace of the first six episodes of The Man in the High Castle often work against the agitated drama of its imagery.
  22. Reviewed by: Kristi Turnquist
    Nov 20, 2015
    70
    Those are a lot of threads to knit together, and some feel looser than others.... But there are enough chilling scenes to make The Man in the High Castle genuinely disturbing.
  23. Reviewed by: Willa Paskin
    Nov 17, 2015
    70
    The show is yet another entrant in the fast-growing category of TV good enough to watch and enjoy, but not quite good enough to make specific time for.
  24. Reviewed by: Verne Gay
    Nov 18, 2015
    67
    Intriguing... but somber and slowww-moving.
  25. Reviewed by: Alex McCown
    Nov 16, 2015
    67
    For a show so saturated with angry, volatile men (and it’s almost all men, here), there’s an awful lot of brooding. But the actors are so strong, and the world they’ve created so lived-in, the show can get away with some of these early missteps.
  26. Reviewed by: Michael Starr
    Dec 8, 2015
    63
    The series, in large part, fails to deliver on its fascinating premise. Simply put, it’s plodding, moves at a glacial pace and overreaches with too many diffuse narrative strands.
  27. Reviewed by: Justin Slaughter
    Nov 19, 2015
    63
    The tone is consistently thrilling, even as the story goes through predictable “everyman finds new hope to fight evil” motions.
  28. Reviewed by: Rob Owen
    Nov 20, 2015
    60
    The Man in the High Castle is a show that walks a fine line; it’s just intriguing enough to keep me coming back, but it doesn’t make me yearn to watch the next episode.
  29. Reviewed by: James Poniewozik
    Nov 19, 2015
    60
    The character-building, unfortunately, is far weaker than the world-building. The dialogue is often B-movie grade, and Juliana and Frank, the closest thing the ensemble has to leads, are dull and dour.... That said, I finished six episodes eager to see the last four. High Castle is at least addictive as a mystery.
  30. Reviewed by: Ed Bark
    Nov 18, 2015
    58
    Amazon Prime takes a big swing here, and doesn’t entirely miss. More was anticipated, though, with High Castle so far tending to buckle under the weight of some very heavy ambitions and expectations.
User Score
7.3

Generally favorable reviews- based on 360 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Negative: 53 out of 360
  1. Nov 22, 2015
    10
    For those who don't know: The show is based on a Phillip K. Dick novel exploring the alternate reality in which the Japanese and Germans wonFor those who don't know: The show is based on a Phillip K. Dick novel exploring the alternate reality in which the Japanese and Germans won World War II. It's more addictive than House of Cards and has a lot more legroom to explore than David Fincher's fantastic work.

    The acting and the directing stand out in this show. It's filled with several homages to David Lynch and Ingmar Bergman with a powerful accented cinematographic style. Rufus Sewell (The Illusionist) plays a masterful antagonist that no doubt will receive some emmy nominations.

    My only gripe with this show (after seeing all of the episodes) is that I wish they spoke in their proper languages (German and Japanese) over English everywhere. I understand that languages other than english have a potential to alienate US audiences, but I think this ruined the immersion a bit. Narcos was mostly in Spanish and (from what I know) has done quite well. Language is powerful in building impactful characters. Just the use of it can change the tone of the show.

    Overall, I'd heavily recommend this show. Ignore the haters below. They're nothing more than pseudo-intellectuals who are pining over incredibly insignificant details. One guy even complained that the use of currencies with no cents ruined the immersion for him. Another is complaining that they didn't get a large scale occupation 'right' because many of the main characters seemed indoctrinated (and he argues 15 years isn't enough). Most of the main characters are under 30, and as such would have spent most of their adult lives in occupation.
    Full Review »
  2. Nov 22, 2015
    3
    This review contains spoilers, click full review link to view. I very much wanted to like this series. It is so ambitious and (considering it's an Amazon headliner) during production possessed all the resources it would have needed to succeed.

    Acting was poor. Characters were thin and hard to relate to. Their emotions were poorly conveyed and their motivations were unclear. Someone close to the main character and she is essentially fine. She decides to do something and people close to her get hurt. Does she not have a heart? Or does she lack a brain?

    The entire universe that they create is laughable. As other users have pointed out, everything was stamped with a swastika. Likely because everyone constantly forgets they are being controlled by an outside power. For approximately two decades. Fat chance. Many objects/structures/vehicles were old/seemingly dysfunctional/generally crap. Yet the Germans had "superior tech" in this reality. Did they want to occupy and work hard at maintaining control in the United States just to turn it into a dump and laugh at it from Berlin? Everything within 2 episodes has cost a whole number in whatever the local currency was. 3 Yen for medicine, 2 Marks for food. 3 Marks for something else. So, no smaller denominations to pay for smaller purchases? That totally makes sense. On and on, the list of these inconsistencies grows as I begin episode 2.

    What I disliked the most was the cliché choices for environment designs. Anyone that has played Fallout or Bioshock will gag at how hard they try to replicate the vibes those games created.
    Full Review »
  3. Nov 20, 2015
    0
    If you do not know ANYTHING at all about history, economics, science, politics, psychology and war, this show may be enjoyable to you. If thisIf you do not know ANYTHING at all about history, economics, science, politics, psychology and war, this show may be enjoyable to you. If this is not the case it is very unlikely that you will find this watchable.

    The entire setup is implausible and sloppily written and pretty much nothing makes sense. The German translations of English signs are almost all wrong and that spells disaster for such a production. Not because the actual text would matter, but because it is a clear sign of amateurish work and producers who don't care about their own products.

    Then there is the swastikas and the constant use of the "Nazi" term. Nazis did not call everything they did and owned "Nazi-XYZ" and they certainly did not adorn EVERYTHING with swastikas. The show however seems to think that it has to maximize the NAZIness out of even a phonebooth. "Greater Nazi Reich" is about as dumb as it comes. Nazi is short for Nationalsozialismus, national socialism, but I am sure the creators of this show do not know that. Plausible names would have been "Deutsch-Amerika", "Amerikanische Staaten von Großdeutschland", or something else along the lines. "Größeres Nazi Reich"? No, not even close. That is as if an American occupation somewhere else would call itself "Embiggened Ammie Union".

    The worst thing however is that they could not even get the concept of an occupied state right. On one hand they present everything as Nazi-occupied and tyrannical, but then they completely fail to have all the things that such systems do. Freedom of travel?! Oh, please. How infantile. No tyrannical system EVER in the entire history of mankind allowed subjugated people freedom of travel. Not even it's own citizens had such freedom. Not in the Soviet Union and not in Nazi Germany.

    Such things matter. Not every piece of it all the time, but for the eventual product.

    The behavior of the characters is even worse. If my system got murdered literally a few meters away from me, I could not even imagine reacting like the woman in the show did. Also for the amount of brainwashing that most of the characters seem to have absorbed, there was simply never enough time between 1947 and 1962. Mere 15 years are not enough to brainwash an entire nation.

    Sloppy, incorrect, implausible, incredible, badly written. The book is actually better but it is a child of it's time. It doesn't help much that the reality portrayed in the setting is factually a "false" reality. Even false realities need to make sense within themselves.
    Full Review »