• Network: SHOWTIME
  • Series Premiere Date: Jan 18, 2004
Season #: 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
Metascore
63

Generally favorable reviews - based on 23 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 12 out of 23
  2. Negative: 1 out of 23
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Stream On
Buy on
Stream On

Critic Reviews

  1. Variety
    Reviewed by: Brian Lowry
    Apr 3, 2014
    60
    Slow-going in developing its web of interconnected plots, this latest demonstration of cable's series-for-every-interest-group strategy is watchable enough, but probably not likely to be the sort of buzzworthy addiction-in-waiting Showtime would like and certainly could use. [13 Jan 2004, p.06]
  2. Seattle Post-Intelligencer
    Reviewed by: Melanie McFarland
    Apr 3, 2014
    60
    But is it too much to ask for these girls to have a bit more fun? This is one series that really needs to swing that way. For a bunch of glamorous, well-dressed womyn who spend a lot of time hanging out at a cool cafe, they sure do suffer from an excess of unease. [17 Jan 2004, p.E2]
  3. Reviewed by: Hal Boedeker
    Apr 3, 2014
    60
    Like "Queer as Folk", this drama about lesbian friends in Los Angeles too often settles for slick melodrama and racy content. Premium cable can offer wonderful freedom, but that's no excuse for resorting to sex scenes with such frequency.
  4. Reviewed by: Matthew Gilbert
    Apr 3, 2014
    60
    The L Word will get some notice because of its frank, soft-core-tinged portrayal of lesbian sexuality. Just as gay men are neutered in the mainstream, shown only as fit, fashion-obsessed, show-tune-savvy fellas, gay women are still trying to shake the Boston marriage image.
  5. Newark Star-Ledger
    Reviewed by: Alan Sepinwall
    Apr 3, 2014
    50
    Like "Queer as Folk," The L Word is essentially a mediocre soap opera in soft-core porno drag. There's lots of hot, sweaty, half-naked bodies, but the heads attached spend so much time droning on and on and on about their mundane lives and loves that the sex scenes just feel like an intermission in between all the tepid girl-on-girl dialogue. [16 Jan 2004, p.55]
  6. Detroit Free Press
    Reviewed by: Mike Duffy
    Apr 3, 2014
    50
    The sex scenes -- yes, there's plenty of bare skin and rising erotic temperatures -- alternate between sensitive and slightly cheesy, a la "Red Shoe Diaries." [16 Jan 2004, p.6H]
  7. Chicago Sun-Times
    Reviewed by: Phil Rosenthal
    Apr 3, 2014
    50
    The dialogue is stuffy, the stories are predictable and, while the idea of a show all about beautiful gay Los Angeles women is interesting, this comes off like a second-rate "Melrose Place" with pretensions of depth. [16 Jan 2004, p.53]
  8. Reviewed by: Amy Amatangelo
    Mar 31, 2014
    50
    When The L Word is judged on its dramatic merits, the real problem is not the stereotypical plot lines or limited scope, but the fact there's nothing here to make the viewer want to tune in every week. Sure, the series throws around catchphrases such as "nipple confidence" and frank talk of "butt waxing," but strip away the attention-grabbing antics and the show is rather boring. Perhaps The L Word stands for lackluster.
  9. Reviewed by: Steve Johnson
    Apr 3, 2014
    40
    L also stands for "lackluster."
  10. Arizona Republic
    Reviewed by: Bill Goodykoontz
    Apr 3, 2014
    40
    Unfortunately, The L Word too often makes it seem as if having sex is all its characters are interested in doing, particularly in the 90-minute first episode. [17 Jan 2004, p.1E]
User Score
6.5

Generally favorable reviews- based on 17 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 11 out of 17
  2. Negative: 5 out of 17
  1. Jan 16, 2017
    3
    Les actrices sont jolies, très jolies même, se trémoussent en cadence, se frottent et se léchouillent, s'embrassent et se roulent des pelles.Les actrices sont jolies, très jolies même, se trémoussent en cadence, se frottent et se léchouillent, s'embrassent et se roulent des pelles. Elles sont branchées et branchouilles et reflètent (à quel point ?) une certaine frange (ou caste ?) de la population lesbienne de Los Angeles, Etats-Unis. Elles sont cultivées, occupent de belles places, brassent une certaine quantité de pognon, évoluent dans les milieux artistiques ou créatifs, consomment de temps à autre quelques produits stupéfiants, font la fête sur des yachts privés, vont en boîte...

    De chaudes lapines qui n'aiment pas la pine mais qui tirent toutes les femelles hétéros ou pas qui bougent de 21 à 77 ans. Attention, lesbiennes en chasse. Quoique dans le lot, on a de la bi aussi, on est pas sectaire ! Elles veulent même faire des mômes, ouais, ouais, ouais.

    Mais le plus édifiant sans doute dans tout cela, c'est que les femmes restent des femmes, et d'entre elles les connes ne ressemblent qu'aux connes. Et je ne suis pas bien sûr (comme chantait Brel) qu'elles soient l'avenir de l'homme.

    Bref, cette série reste une série bien conne qui ressemble à n'importe quelle autre série bien conne et nunuche, colportant clichés et stéréotypes à l'envi au ras des pâquerettes. Ce n'est qu'un mauvais feuilleton sirupeux et ennuyeux, très ennuyeux. Gazon Maudit, une comédie sans prétention avait bien mieux couvert et ciblé le sujet, un comble.
    Full Review »