- Network: ABC
- Series Premiere Date: Oct 16, 2018
User Score
Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 91 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 32 out of 91
-
Mixed: 7 out of 91
-
Negative: 52 out of 91
Watch Now
Where To Watch
Review this tv show
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
User Reviews
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
Oct 16, 2018This was not what i was expecting , The Conners show was dark , depressing , and not funny at all , what ashame what ABC did to the Roseanne show ,they are trying to ride on the coat tails of Roseanne ,I give it a couple weeks and it will be OFF the air ,
-
Oct 16, 2018Terrible. Total waste of time. I don't even understand why Roseanne wasn't on the show. I thought the show was about her.
-
Nov 25, 2018
-
Nov 3, 2018
-
Nov 8, 2018Horrible, Just horrible. As a fan of the original Roseanne series, it just isn't the same without her in the show. She is what brought the laughter. I don't see this renewing for a second season, but I could be wrong.
-
Dec 5, 2018
-
Dec 5, 2018
-
Nov 4, 2020This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Nov 28, 2018
-
Nov 1, 2018This is a horrible show!!!! It was called Roseanne for a reason. The acting is horrible and Darlene and Jackie CANNOT carry this show. They should never have fired her. HUGE mistake!!
I tried because I loved the original show and the reboot of Roseanne but I will not waste time with this show again. -
Nov 11, 2018The Conners first two programs were well done00well written and well--acted. The third was a bit of a dud. It is hard to tell whether the writers will manage to propel the series forward toward a show with its own identity sans Roseanne Barr.
I note some politically motivated reviews here that seek to degrade the show because the authors support Barr's racist messages. Truly pathetic! -
Oct 17, 2018Shame on the ABC network, politically disappearing Roseanne from her own show because of her racially overblown tweet. It would've been nice if the rest of the cast had of supported her... maybe just a little bit. And then continuing the series without her. It's like watching Batman with a bunch of Robins. No thanks!
-
Mar 23, 2019Poor sidekicks show. Not even close to Rosanne especially episodes before reboot .
-
Oct 17, 2018I just didn't find it very entertaining. We'll see how the next few episodes progress, but at this point, I don't see this show lasting.
-
Oct 17, 2018
-
Oct 17, 2018Show is appreciably worse without Rosanne. That was a foolish mistake to not accept her apology and keep her on HER show. I'm sure it'll flame out within a half season.
-
Oct 16, 2018Worst show I've seen in my entire life. Why would they do this. What a ridiculous and insulting premise.
-
Oct 18, 2018
-
Oct 19, 2018Episode 1: Roseanne funeral. Tribute given. Show over. Thank you, have a good life, "The Conners".
-
Oct 17, 2018
-
Oct 18, 2018Simply Awful.
Every joke falls flat, and it seems like they are either trying too hard or not at all, leading to a general sense of awkwardness in every scene. And, no respect for the woman who got them where they are.
Awards & Rankings
-
The result is a very interesting little sitcom, where what’s happening backstage reflects what’s happening on camera. It’s mostly about loss; for Dan, Darlene, and Jackie, it’s become about the redefinition of their roles in the Conner family. The setting snaps so familiarly into place that it’s like a time capsule.
-
The lovingly biting tone of the working-class comedy remains much the same. [29 Oct - 11 Nov 2018, p.11]
-
None of them has ever carried a series before, and as good as they were in The Conners debut, the glue that held the show together was the unseen ghost of Roseanne, as aggravating and amusing as ever, invisible but never absent. I'll believe she's replaceable when I see it.