Season #: 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
User Score
6.9

Generally favorable reviews- based on 296 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Negative: 71 out of 296
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Expand

Review this tv show

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

User Reviews

  1. Jul 5, 2016
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I should have waited until I finished the season before posting the first review. After a rough start, the season two found its footing around episode 8 or so and came to a satisfying end, so I recommend sticking it out. Without revealing too many spoilers, I have no idea why they chose to kill Anya, as her successor Lexa doesn't have anywhere near the same gravitas. I guess the writers decided to have someone younger to counter Clarke, but this baby-faced vixen doesn't look like the kind of person who is going to hold an alliance of "Grounders" together. It would have better to go with Indra.

    I liked the concept of Mt. Weather. It reminded me a lot of "A Boy and His Dog," but the writers offered some nice twists of their own, particularly in the President's son, Cage, who is one of the better villains in this show, especially after the "star people" and "tree people" decide to make peace. The situation inside the mountain gives Jasper and Monty a chance to shine. On the outside, Octavia goes Grounder with her heartthrob Lincoln having a pretty tough time of it, but you know these two will come together in the end.

    What drags this show down are the adults. Now that they've joined their children on earth they attempt to impose their rules again, but the kids are having none of it and why should they, as they have shown they can handle the rough and tumble earth on their own. This pits mom against daughter in Abbey and Clarke, while Marcus tries to be peacekeeper. Thelonious Jaha finds his way back to the ark only to go on a "walkabout" to find "The City of Light," which I suppose is the set up for season three as it has almost no relevance to season two other than to divert your attention.

    Quite a few role reversals in the main characters, some for the better, others for the worse. Nice to have Murphy back although he mostly provides comic relief. The show takes itself way too seriously with far too many discursions on morality. The show functions better when it sticks to the action, which revolves around rescuing the 48 kids trapped in the mountain.

    I like the writers' ambition, even if the setting is rather dubious. This is supposed to be the East Coast of the United States, and as we learned in Season One it is Washington, DC, but you would be hard pressed to find terrain like down in the tidewater region of Virginia. Why not have made it British Columbia, where the scenes are actually filmed? It wasn't that important to let us know that Lincoln was named after the Lincoln Memorial. But, this sets up one interesting scene in what is left of the national zoo.

    Ultimately, it comes down to Clarke and Bellamy to save the day. Both characters have grown into their own. As far as teen shows go this is pretty good, even if it has lost the playfulness of the first season. I suppose they had to grow up.
    Expand
  2. Sep 8, 2015
    10
    Season 2 continues where season 1 left off. This show is really amazing. Started watching it and couldn't stop. There are so many cool sci fi themes and issues in the show that it really keeps you interested in watching. Characters are also very interesting and bring you in. I would highly recommend this show to any sci fi fan! You won't be disappointed.
  3. Jul 31, 2015
    9
    The thrilling continuation of the series. A lot less teeny **** a lot more impossible situations. The show rarely pulls punches and superbly levels the playing field between all factions, making sure that nobody can claim a moral highground.

    The show definitely managed to surprise me a lot more than most. Many moments when you'd expect any other writer to have a hero (or benevolent
    The thrilling continuation of the series. A lot less teeny **** a lot more impossible situations. The show rarely pulls punches and superbly levels the playing field between all factions, making sure that nobody can claim a moral highground.

    The show definitely managed to surprise me a lot more than most. Many moments when you'd expect any other writer to have a hero (or benevolent circumstance) step in go by and it manages to give you an impression of the evil humans are capable of. People die on all sides and few hands are left clean. The characters, even those who were ignorable in season 1, grow and change in interesting ways and the writers did a great job of switching between putting honorable intentions in people's minds and mouths and then confronting them with impossible choices.

    It's not "the best show ever" but it IS great and, assuming the crew doesn't write itself into a corner and the show doesn't overstay its welcome, it's definitely got a shot at staying up there.
    Expand
  4. Mar 2, 2016
    8
    The 100 has once again established a mysterious and inventive tone, one that answers just enough questions while asking a whole lot more. The second season of The 100, visually, morally and thematically, quietly builds on the strengths of Season 1.
  5. Oct 30, 2014
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Season 2 is already a step in the right direction, it can only get better from here. I just hope they explore the earth not get stuck in a endless loop of camping in the forest. Expand
  6. Jan 28, 2015
    10
    The first season stepped it up every week. Who knew season two could do just the same? A stylish, fast-paced take on a post-apocaplytic world 97 years from now.
  7. Mar 6, 2015
    10
    Currently one of the best shows I've watched ever. Its a very interesting show to say the least. Its endings want you to come back for more. This season has really stepped it up from last season. I like the characters. I like the atmosphere of this show. These guys have done a really good job with this show.
  8. Oct 23, 2015
    10
    The first season was good (the first episodes were ugly) , but season 2 is absolutely incredible ,i just cant believe that this series get so few publicity.
  9. Oct 24, 2014
    10
    Great show. A little cheesy at times but the multiple story lines and life / death situations make up for that. Every sci-fi lover should give this show a chance.
  10. Nov 3, 2014
    3
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. So two episodes into the 100 2nd Season... And it's still as bad as the first season. Badly written characters (only Clarke has the opinion that the Mountain people are bad while the others are happy to get a meal), characters are doing very naive assumptions which turn out to be true of course, which makes the episode very predictable and just plain boring.
    Still I hope it gets better and that Clarke dies soon.
    Expand
  11. Nov 8, 2014
    10
    There are two shows I keep this season on DVR and one of them is The 100 the other is Scorpion, which just posted they had 25 million viewers for first show. Can't understand why the ratings are so low for The 100. Well written and exciting to see unfold what happens to these survivors! Please tell others to watch this show!
  12. May 5, 2015
    8
    Wow, second season and im glad i continued to watch the show.They changed a lot i think.It feels so much darker and grimm, i love it.Thats the show i expected when season 1 started.For season 2 they stopped that **** all that love drama and made it more realistic.Its not about who kisses or **** who, its about survival, betrayal and other important questions.They put a lot of effort in theWow, second season and im glad i continued to watch the show.They changed a lot i think.It feels so much darker and grimm, i love it.Thats the show i expected when season 1 started.For season 2 they stopped that **** all that love drama and made it more realistic.Its not about who kisses or **** who, its about survival, betrayal and other important questions.They put a lot of effort in the sript and the story for season 2.I like season 2 and give it a 8/10.Comparison to season 1:3/10, i hated the teenstuff in it.I hope they continue to make the show better, it got some potential left to be a really really good show. Expand
  13. Feb 14, 2015
    5
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Entertaining, exciting, well made, ridiculous science. Radiation is so potent that the mountain men turn into a packet of crisps within seconds, yet lots of people have survived on the surface and the Sky people seem to suffer no ill effects. Ah! but the Sky people have been genetically altered (surface people haven't though - plot hole), Ah! but the surface people have gone through survival of the fittest (radiation has a cumulative effect that gets worse over longer periods of exposure - if it's so virulent now it kills in seconds - so has to be 30 rads or significantly higher - then it was a lot higher in the past and would have killed virtually all human life, if not straight away then certainly over years). Mountain men couldn't take bone marrow from surface dwellers or even slowly raise radiation levels over a few generations inside the mountain, or even by gradual exposure of a select few to build resistance?

    Why didn't the mountain men just come clean straight off with the 48? Look folks, the grounders kept attacking us, they're horrible, just like they've been attacking you lot just for being different, they were going at it with us. We lost people, we captured some of them, used their blood to cure those they hurt, then we kept em and keep using their blood to repair ourselves from every time their barbarian hordes have a go at us. Your folks have landed, we can help them, can you help us? Cheers everyone, here's to surviving against the common enemy.

    Even when attacked the MM are useless and thick. In episode 12 on a youtube clip we see one of them going in to a knife fight with the four day trained ninja Octavia who has a sword! Erm, pick up the gun mate, slot em at a distance. Call up MM for a missile strike. Also what's stopping deployment of the acid fog followed by a sortie by the suited up MM to wipe out the grounder sky people camp? Then we discover that the MM are so brutish, so horrible that some of their number will gladly help a mob of selfish brats deplete the MM population and let Brattemy loose on the ventilation system.

    Its a great series, but I just wish the writers had not been so lazy as to turn radiation into magic that defies the laws of physics and make the bad guys (MM) so bad, so evil, that they are thick to boot!

    Fiction even of this kind just needs to have some semblance of the laws of physics within the world setting but the writers just kick out the science book for a plot turn, which ruins it.
    Expand
  14. Mar 8, 2015
    4
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Review includes spoilers.

    This show started out with an interesting premise. Only a few thousand humans survived a nuclear apocalypse. They live on a space station, which is decaying. In desperation, the station sends 100 criminals to the surface, in hopes that they can survive. If so, then the others on the station may join them.

    Pretty cool. Except for a problem that very quickly introduced itself: the surface is crawling with humans. There is no urgency for the people from the space station to survive so they can repopulate the Earth, because it's already populated. You can't throw a cat without hitting a different faction, even in the remote environs of Mount Washington.

    So, we go into the show's second act: tribal warfare. Endless, repetitive tribal warfare. Slightly spiced up by the fact that in this world, somehow attractive teen girls hold most warlord roles. Speaking of teen girl warlords, The 100 unfortunately features the most wooden, boring lead character I can remember on a TV show, though she is attractive, so there's that, at least.

    This show could have been so much more. As things stand, it's watchable, as long as you don't look for anything beyond cliche.
    Expand
  15. Jun 7, 2015
    9
    I liked a lot the first season then how it start s2 it is very intriguing.
    We Lear a lot more about the surroundings and the new groups.
    I didn't appreciate the end of s2, but the over all experience is great.
    A nice show that is almost free on NetFlix
  16. May 28, 2015
    10
    This show starts off slow but ends with an interesting note. This show has the quality to deliver the post apocalyptic theme. The story of the show has be continued and portrayed both beautifully and interestingly from the season 2, the season 1 may not be as good as season 2 but it delivers the audience what they want, it picks up quickly and did not descent the hope I have in the show.This show starts off slow but ends with an interesting note. This show has the quality to deliver the post apocalyptic theme. The story of the show has be continued and portrayed both beautifully and interestingly from the season 2, the season 1 may not be as good as season 2 but it delivers the audience what they want, it picks up quickly and did not descent the hope I have in the show. Waiting eagerly for season 3 :D Expand
  17. Jun 21, 2015
    10
    the 100 has an intriguing premise as we've watch it go from season 1 to the end of season 2 and are left waiting eager for season 3. The characters have grown and changed a bit since they landed and it was good to see the growth and change in decisions and mind sets. Interesting challenges faced as you learn of grounders and mountain men. Also some new areas are explored with the differingthe 100 has an intriguing premise as we've watch it go from season 1 to the end of season 2 and are left waiting eager for season 3. The characters have grown and changed a bit since they landed and it was good to see the growth and change in decisions and mind sets. Interesting challenges faced as you learn of grounders and mountain men. Also some new areas are explored with the differing parts of the map being ventured to, the city of lights adds a new curiosity for fans as to what it holds. Left with some good cliff hangers at the end of Season 2. Expand
  18. Jul 27, 2015
    10
    Amazing. As I said in my review of the first season, this one is getting much better... I've been quite happy keeping watching the show otherwise I would have missed a lot. I could identify myself to the characters in this season. They had difficult choices to make and it was full of suspense. I'm looking forward to watching the next season!
  19. Aug 11, 2015
    7
    At times certain twists in The 100 appear as if stolen from The Walking Dead or perhaps even older apocalyptic cliches, but the series truly grows in depth and quality as it transitions from Season 1 to Season 2. By the end of Season 2, you have a no-nonsense, uncompromising, no-sugar-coating-allowed, epic depiction of what philosophers call the Problem of Dirty Hands. The "internalAt times certain twists in The 100 appear as if stolen from The Walking Dead or perhaps even older apocalyptic cliches, but the series truly grows in depth and quality as it transitions from Season 1 to Season 2. By the end of Season 2, you have a no-nonsense, uncompromising, no-sugar-coating-allowed, epic depiction of what philosophers call the Problem of Dirty Hands. The "internal plausibility" of its world has also increased, and many "finishing touches" appear in Season 2, including one of my obsessions: Trigedasleng -- a force-evolved version of English in the year 2149 designed by linguist David J. Peterson. I am also enjoying the radical color- and gender- and age-blindness of the show. All in all, if we consider Season 1 a "slow and sketchy buildup", the show deserves at least a 7 out of 10. Expand
  20. Jan 27, 2016
    10
    I really loved where season 2 went in comparison with season 1. Even though is a lot more darker, we get to see the characters grow so much (for better or for worse). The mid-season and season finale were definetly highlights of the show.
  21. Oct 27, 2014
    7
    First off, I enjoyed Season 1 of The 100. The multiple storylines coupled post apocalyptic scenarios, bandits, and a world untraveled after being struck with the a-bomb(s) could have opened up many possible avenues for the show to carry on. The acting was decent, which is not always required for a sci-fi. But it was.

    And so we have the start of Season 2, again - there's many
    First off, I enjoyed Season 1 of The 100. The multiple storylines coupled post apocalyptic scenarios, bandits, and a world untraveled after being struck with the a-bomb(s) could have opened up many possible avenues for the show to carry on. The acting was decent, which is not always required for a sci-fi. But it was.

    And so we have the start of Season 2, again - there's many scenarios that can play out this season without the need for sometimes outlandish or over-the-top extra-terrestrial life mixed in. We already have a show like that on air, it's called Defiance. Not that Defiance is a bad show either. .

    I just hope The 100 keep to the heart of the show and that is with the remaining prisoners turned pioneer along with how the adjoining adults from space and wondering how long it will take before they screw it up again - living on Earth that is.
    Expand
  22. Jan 2, 2015
    2
    The concept of this show was very interesting, but the characters are overbearing and poorly written.The uneven plot and sophomoric attempt at shock value makes me think that it was definitely trying to emulate shows like LOST and fell short by a mile. This is the kind of show that would have been good if it had been produced by another station, However, like a lot of the CW shows, thereThe concept of this show was very interesting, but the characters are overbearing and poorly written.The uneven plot and sophomoric attempt at shock value makes me think that it was definitely trying to emulate shows like LOST and fell short by a mile. This is the kind of show that would have been good if it had been produced by another station, However, like a lot of the CW shows, there is way too much focus on catering to the whims of adolescent viewers who are obsessed with shipping their romantic couple of choice and who are only interested in watching shows with attractive characters in their 20s (there are older characters, but they get a lazy edit and are clearly not the focus of the show), I dropped the show halfway through the 1st season and then picked it up again in the 2nd season because a lot of its fans claimed that it had improved substantially ( I'm a huge fan of that type of Syfy genre and so I really wanted to like it), but I felt that it suffered from the same implausible storylines and poor character development as in the first season. also, despite the show's attempt to be a unique science fiction show about repopulating a damaged Earth, most viewers seem to be primarily obsessed with whether or not two of the lead actors will hook up, which says a lot about the show. Expand
  23. Jun 1, 2015
    1
    Most of the drama comes from manufactured conflicts caused by obvious bad decisions and characters picking fights with each other over things a five minute conversation would solve. Lots of drawn out scenes, characters pausing for no reason (when time is critical), horribly bad dialogue. Plus the whole radiation damage thing just didn't work, it's bad science fiction, like some soapMost of the drama comes from manufactured conflicts caused by obvious bad decisions and characters picking fights with each other over things a five minute conversation would solve. Lots of drawn out scenes, characters pausing for no reason (when time is critical), horribly bad dialogue. Plus the whole radiation damage thing just didn't work, it's bad science fiction, like some soap opera writer wrote it. So so many tack lines..."I had no choice" is the standard answer when someone really screws up (yah right).

    I spent the entire final episode trying to figure out how to share with everyone how bad this is. Season one was good, season two lost it.
    Expand
  24. Mar 5, 2015
    10
    The second season of The 100 is all about exploring humanity through hard choices and hard dilemmas about morality, and does it with grace. The cast shows significant improvements from season 1, with Eliza Taylor (who plays the main character, Clarke) becoming one of the show's strongest assets.
    Through each episode The 100 builds an incredibly well forged fast pace, along with incredible
    The second season of The 100 is all about exploring humanity through hard choices and hard dilemmas about morality, and does it with grace. The cast shows significant improvements from season 1, with Eliza Taylor (who plays the main character, Clarke) becoming one of the show's strongest assets.
    Through each episode The 100 builds an incredibly well forged fast pace, along with incredible editing, music cues, stunt coordination and specials effects, all of which makes the environment all the more real and compelling.
    The story and the treatment of the characters are as realistic as TV gets, with The 100 pushing both of them to the limits of TV conventions and breaking those limits.
    At one point it seemed as The 100 came to take on Lost's place, but the similarities now are much more closer to Game of Thrones. That doesn't mean the show is a clone or outright copies it; in fact, The 100 has its own aesthetic and its own way with the characters, pace and storyline treatment, but delivering a quality that may just be as high as GoT.
    As a whole, the second season of The 100 doesn't back down or return to the status quo of season 1, instead it embraces the new dynamics and evolves into an even better show than it was before.
    Expand
  25. Mar 18, 2015
    8
    I was seriously on the fence about this show, didn’t think it was that interesting and basically watched the first season because I had an hour to kill. The second season premiere did not change my opinion of the show, in fact I thought it was all going that hill from there down but boy I was wrong.

    The new opening theme looks great, it suits the show and make it even more futuristic
    I was seriously on the fence about this show, didn’t think it was that interesting and basically watched the first season because I had an hour to kill. The second season premiere did not change my opinion of the show, in fact I thought it was all going that hill from there down but boy I was wrong.

    The new opening theme looks great, it suits the show and make it even more futuristic then just set up in a post apocalyptic world. That said, the Mount Weather storyline was, for a while, the worst one of the show because if you have half a brain, once you know why the Mountain Men still live underground, you guess why they want Clarke and her friends - The 48. But the writers of the show were smart and didn't take the audience for idiots, so Clarke found proof by episode 2. Another reason why I didn’t like the introduction of the Mountain Men was simply consanguinity. If they’ve been living in the Mountain for a nearly a hundred years how the **** are they looking alright? Aren't they all cousins by now?

    Anyway, the show got better, it got real good, real fast the writers dug themselves out of this whole and turned things around. The 100 S2 built on the strengths of season 1 and became intriguing. They've broadened the scope of the show with the mountain men then mentioning the Ice People and they've brought back the monsters, mutated animals, and most importantly they gave layers to the Grounders.
    The battle for power and leadership in the different groups was genius, worthy of a Game of Thrones comparison - No, it wasn’t. I’m being way too kind. There was a lot of twists and turns and it was thrilling to watch. It’s mysterious, exciting, they’ve managed to jam a lot in the series, new characters, new dynamics, and new territories to keep us guessing and asking for more.

    The 100 is shaping up to be one the best non comic book related shows on the CW.
    @wornoutspines
    Expand
  26. Jan 18, 2016
    10
    I wouldn't pay much attention to the negative reviews on here. If you want to watch a show that resembles The Hunger Games and The Divergent movies, then watch The 100. It won't disappoint. When the show first aired on television, I wasn't interested in it because of the name of the show. But then I gave it a shot when I came across it on Netflix when season 2 ended on tv. I watchedI wouldn't pay much attention to the negative reviews on here. If you want to watch a show that resembles The Hunger Games and The Divergent movies, then watch The 100. It won't disappoint. When the show first aired on television, I wasn't interested in it because of the name of the show. But then I gave it a shot when I came across it on Netflix when season 2 ended on tv. I watched seasons 1 and 2 in one day! I couldn't stop watching it. The brilliant directors of the 100 reeled me in, and I was hooked. The 100 is so smart and clever in maneuvering the most hardest decisions a character has to make into the most suspenseful moments i've ever seen in a tv show. Not to mention, the story is very well written and very action packed. If you like action, suspense, some comedy, and romance--WATCH THIS SHOW. I think it's way better than most of the other cw shows. Expand
  27. May 23, 2015
    0
    Its a gender studies essay delivered through Dawson's Creek story lines and acting in the setting of Lost. There are no redeeming features to this train wreck of a series.
  28. Aug 10, 2015
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. three words... BEST SHOW EVER :-) it is one of the few shows i obsess over lol. the 100 is such o good show i honestly dont see how some people think the characters are too "fake" or the people in the realtionships "dont have chemistry" um... hello?! have u people see the chemistry between these people?! just look at octavia and lincoln... clarke and bellamy... maya and jasper... lexa and clarke amazing chemistry i will always give The 100 a 10 of 10 i really hope season 3 wont be the last season Expand
  29. Jan 22, 2017
    7
    Like S1, the second season kept bringing interesting-enough plot twists with sufficient regularity to keep me watching, so I have to rate it a 7/10, but it also kept throwing out frequent poorly acted scenes, hard to believe battles, an overabundance of dramatic-turnaround-and-a-last-thing-to-say scenes and stupid justifications for why things work out a certain way, so it's not goingLike S1, the second season kept bringing interesting-enough plot twists with sufficient regularity to keep me watching, so I have to rate it a 7/10, but it also kept throwing out frequent poorly acted scenes, hard to believe battles, an overabundance of dramatic-turnaround-and-a-last-thing-to-say scenes and stupid justifications for why things work out a certain way, so it's not going anywhere near an 8/10. Expand
  30. Mar 15, 2017
    6
    ‘The 100’ caught my attention with its ‘Lord of the Flies’ flavor (with teens instead of kids), but it tries too hard. It is stressful and too intense, showing a gasping thrill every five minutes. First, we fear 100 kids may die as they journey from a space station to earth, then they get speared by cavemen called Grounders (who happen to speak English), then some of them kill off each‘The 100’ caught my attention with its ‘Lord of the Flies’ flavor (with teens instead of kids), but it tries too hard. It is stressful and too intense, showing a gasping thrill every five minutes. First, we fear 100 kids may die as they journey from a space station to earth, then they get speared by cavemen called Grounders (who happen to speak English), then some of them kill off each other, then the most civilized people on the planet suck the kids’ bone marrow for medicinal reasons… ahhhhhhh! I need to take a tranquilizer after watching this show. My blood pressure is high enough, thank you very much. There’s never a down moment. There’s never a calm atmosphere. I can’t breathe. I can’t relax. It’s suspense on steroids. Enough! Expand
  31. Jan 13, 2017
    10
    I have to say this is quite possibly the best season of television I have seen in a long time. Every episode was good and some (like the midseason finale and the actual finale) were simply mind-blowing. The show continues to test the characters and take them down new paths in their character journeys, which is always refreshing to see. It is not afraid of following disconcerting and tragicI have to say this is quite possibly the best season of television I have seen in a long time. Every episode was good and some (like the midseason finale and the actual finale) were simply mind-blowing. The show continues to test the characters and take them down new paths in their character journeys, which is always refreshing to see. It is not afraid of following disconcerting and tragic plot lines. This season is honestly amazing. Expand
  32. May 30, 2018
    9
    I'm going to give 9, because really the first season was better, but I kept loving it.
  33. Sep 22, 2018
    8
    É a continuação emocionante da série. A série definitivamente conseguiu me surpreender, porque pensei que a mesma se desviasse do bom caminho. As pessoas morrem por todos os lados e quase ninguém sai de um problema sem ser afetado. Os personagens, mesmo aqueles ignorantes na primeira temporada, cresceram e mudaram de formas interessantes. Não é a melhor série de sempre, mas ainda é ótima.É a continuação emocionante da série. A série definitivamente conseguiu me surpreender, porque pensei que a mesma se desviasse do bom caminho. As pessoas morrem por todos os lados e quase ninguém sai de um problema sem ser afetado. Os personagens, mesmo aqueles ignorantes na primeira temporada, cresceram e mudaram de formas interessantes. Não é a melhor série de sempre, mas ainda é ótima.
Metascore
tbd

No score yet - based on 2 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 2
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 2
  3. Negative: 0 out of 2
  1. Reviewed by: Brian Lowry
    Oct 21, 2014
    70
    The fast pace, multiple plot lines and life-or-death scenarios--coupled with solid anchoring from Turco, Cusick and Isaiah Washington--generally compensate for the show’s clunkier aspects and occasionally silly-sounding dialogue.
  2. Reviewed by: Dalene Rovenstine
    Oct 20, 2014
    91
    There's blood, drama, and edge-of-your-seat action--no zombies necessary.