Season #: 3, 2, 1
User Score
7.6

Generally favorable reviews- based on 76 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 55 out of 76
  2. Negative: 9 out of 76
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Stream On
Stream On

Review this tv show

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

User Reviews

  1. Jun 17, 2015
    5
    The plot seems very limited, a top secret high tech group solves local crimes!

    The idea behind it is pretty good and solid but it has not been taken far enough. The actors are struggling with this limited plot.
  2. Jun 3, 2015
    4
    "Stichers" is the latest from ABC Family. So far the network has been hit or miss in terms of quality with its new shows, and this leans more toward a miss. There is the kernel of a good idea here, and the show could develop with time, but the execution was lacking in the pilot. It felt like the show wanted to showcase its technology and effects (which weren't great) at the expense of"Stichers" is the latest from ABC Family. So far the network has been hit or miss in terms of quality with its new shows, and this leans more toward a miss. There is the kernel of a good idea here, and the show could develop with time, but the execution was lacking in the pilot. It felt like the show wanted to showcase its technology and effects (which weren't great) at the expense of developing characters to care about. When you have a lead that has a condition that prevents them from expressing emotion, you need a better hook into the world than the one offered in this pilot. Expand
  3. Jun 6, 2015
    4
    Piloto muito ruim, quem vai querer ver o próximo desse jeito. além que o roteiro já não é grande novidade, pior produção da ABC Family que já vi e olha que não sou lá exigente.
  4. Jun 12, 2015
    5
    So far, not great. The concept is kind of cool, and I don't mind a couple of the characters. Cameron is delightfully nerdy and Camille is **** but interesting. Even Linus is pretty funny. But so far, I can't stand Kirsten. Her temporal dysplasia prevents her from having any perception of time, but it's as if she's been living in a cave her whole life. She lacks even basic socialSo far, not great. The concept is kind of cool, and I don't mind a couple of the characters. Cameron is delightfully nerdy and Camille is **** but interesting. Even Linus is pretty funny. But so far, I can't stand Kirsten. Her temporal dysplasia prevents her from having any perception of time, but it's as if she's been living in a cave her whole life. She lacks even basic social skills. She appears to have no emotions, and she doesn't even understand well-known expressions, like "on the record". I want to like this show, but the ridiculousness of the main character constantly pulls me out of the narrative. Expand
Metascore
48

Mixed or average reviews - based on 9 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 9
  2. Negative: 0 out of 9
  1. Reviewed by: Mary McNamara
    Jun 2, 2015
    40
    It's all completely ridiculous and derivative, which Schechter is quick to acknowledge. Indeed, the second-best thing about "Stitchers" is its game if not quite successful attempt to straddle sci-fi and sci-fi satire.... The first-best thing about the show is its cast, who all show promise far beyond the limits of their roles here.
  2. 60
    Stitchers is cute and so slight in dramatic gravitas that it floats away into the ether.
  3. Reviewed by: Kate Kulzick
    Jun 2, 2015
    58
    Harris is saddled with quite a bit of exposition, but his most significant hurdle is the series’ uneven tone. Stitchers oscillates between embracing the premise’s inherent campiness or eschewing it in favor of a more intense quasi-realism.