Star Trek: Discovery

:

Season 1
Season #: 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
User Score
4.5

Mixed or average reviews- based on 1324 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 527 out of 1324
  2. Mixed: 158 out of 1324
  3. Negative: 639 out of 1324
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Stream On
Stream On

Review this tv show

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

User Reviews

view
per page
  1. ScienceAdvisor
    Feb 13, 2018
    5
    (Based on seeing all 15 episodes instead of just 3)
    A curious mix of good, bad, and downright ugly. Too much development in areas that are to be later discarded, convenience as a major story elements, and shaky handicam moments, albeit with the same UHD quality, drags this down to sub-par town. A near total disregard for continuity, where the writers/director/showrunner cannot    (Based on seeing all 15 episodes instead of just 3)
    A curious mix of good, bad, and downright ugly. Too much development in areas that are to be later discarded, convenience as a major story elements, and shaky handicam moments, albeit with the same UHD quality, drags this down to sub-par town. A near total disregard for continuity, where the writers/director/showrunner cannot understand that a destination only one light year away takes about 1 second at max. warp, is never going to please those weaned on Star Trek. CBS is committed, so here is hoping season two sees significant improvements.    … Expand
  2. DoctorZack
    Oct 1, 2017
    4
    Congratulations. Even if you don't delve into this with a political mind, this is by far the most disappointing inclusion into the Star Trek franchise. While visually stunning (because money), the series lacks any of the heart or resemblance to the franchise's previous entries. My advice, go watch The Orville if you want to see a true Star Trek heir.
  3. ppstudent
    Sep 29, 2017
    4
    As a Trek fan, I'm quite disappointed in the way the first episode went. Maybe that is me but there is so many things wrong with the characters. The cast was kind of weak and maybe that will improve as they gets through the first few episodes. One of the problems is that Star Trek wasn't made to be both stiff and dark. On the other hand, Star Trek Orville has a strong cast, a strong storyAs a Trek fan, I'm quite disappointed in the way the first episode went. Maybe that is me but there is so many things wrong with the characters. The cast was kind of weak and maybe that will improve as they gets through the first few episodes. One of the problems is that Star Trek wasn't made to be both stiff and dark. On the other hand, Star Trek Orville has a strong cast, a strong story line, and a lot of humor (both flat and funny).… Expand
  4. Mathias01
    Mar 2, 2019
    1
    This is not Star Trek. This is Social Justice Trek through and through. I liked them all. TOS, TNG, DS9, Voyager (who had a female captain I admired) and Enterprise. Those were Star Trek series. Those were the visions of Gene Roddenberry. This show? God almighty the political undertones are enough to make a person sick. Has every tv show and movie been corrupted by toxic SJW nonsense? STDThis is not Star Trek. This is Social Justice Trek through and through. I liked them all. TOS, TNG, DS9, Voyager (who had a female captain I admired) and Enterprise. Those were Star Trek series. Those were the visions of Gene Roddenberry. This show? God almighty the political undertones are enough to make a person sick. Has every tv show and movie been corrupted by toxic SJW nonsense? STD certainly lives up to its abbreviation. Hard pass.… Expand
  5. peregrin5
    Mar 24, 2019
    10
    If you are a gate-keeping Star Trek fan, there's no doubt you'll hate this show because it's not the same exact show that you grew up with.

    That said, that's what makes this show so brilliant. Too many Star Trek reboots have tried to play on ToS or TNG success and created cookie-cutter series with almost identical plot lines and characters. Thank GOD Discovery changed the way it did.    If you are a gate-keeping Star Trek fan, there's no doubt you'll hate this show because it's not the same exact show that you grew up with.

    That said, that's what makes this show so brilliant. Too many Star Trek reboots have tried to play on ToS or TNG success and created cookie-cutter series with almost identical plot lines and characters. Thank GOD Discovery changed the way it did.

    While some of the pseudo-science sounds hokey, in the larger Star Trek canon, it's really not that bad.

    The characters are deep, flawed, vulnerable, well-developed, and evolve throughout the series. The writing is incredible, and every time you think you've got one up on the writers and that they might be going in a predictable route, they turn the entire thing on its head and disrupt your expectations entirely!

    The show doesn't shy away from its dark plots, but it also doesn't paint a dreary depressing galaxy like many of the semi-recent sci-fi successes (i.e. Battlestar Galactica, Stargate Atlantis). Hope and adventure are always right around the corner and every episode you're left at the edge of your seat eagerly waiting to find out what happens next.

    Again, if what you like is the shallow, feel-good, low energy writing of past Star Trek series, you're going to hate this. If you hate the fact that the only straight white male character on this show is essentially a side character even though he's the captain because you HATE representation and diversity, you will hate this show (and you're a piece of crap human being). If you feel like no one has any right to EVER change or update any media from your childhood memories (OMG MAH KLINGONS!) you'll hate this show. But if you're actually open to what is a BRILLIANTLY written show with amazing characters, writing, and acting, you will NOT be disappointed. This is one of the best sci-fi shows out there right now, right along with The Expanse.    … Expand
  6. blatalinak
    Apr 7, 2019
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I honestly don't know how they could have messed up this show any worse and I am heart broken about it. I watch Star Trek when I've had a bad day and need to chill. This isn't Star Trek. It's the Michael Burnham super hero hour. Michael knows everything and can solve everything. She is Wesley Crusher to the 10th power. She's even much smarter than Spock. She is the most unlikable, uninteresting hero I've ever seen. I know nothing about the rest of the crew. I barely know their names. It's all Michael all the time. . She mutinies against her captain, causes a war, gets a bunch of people killed, is raised a Vulcan but cannot control her emotions and at the end of the day she comes out smelling like a rose? Also everyone is madly in love with her or interested in her. Why are they pushing this so hard? It doesn't work! I don't blame the actress I blame the writers.

    Klingons are not blue or clear. There are so many races they had to work with. There are races on Stark Trek that were only shown once over the years and never again. These stories on TNG, DS9 and Voyager were so compelling and profound. I wondered why they were never mentioned again. They could have easily picked up one of them and continued with their story. Why did they have to mess up the Klingons?

    I don't think this show can be saved. This show should cease immediately. They should act like it's the Wolverine Origins movie or the Ryan Reynolds Green Lantern movie. It never happened. Forget about it. Make a new story with new actors and new characters. Here's an idea. Let's go FORWARD in the story. No more prequels for a long time. Please stop with the identify politics. No one wants to be preached at. As a woman I can say I love Captain Janeway, Dr. Crusher, Officer Uhura, Kira Nerys, 7 of 9 and Guinan. Jazdea Dax is my favorite character in all of Star Trek. Please get rid of the Michael Bernham show and review your prior successful female characters going forward.    … Expand
  7. flowbeus
    Sep 26, 2017
    5
    I have to give this a low score. It's just not the Star Trek I want it to be. I don't want to watch space explosions and amazing CGI and nothing else interesting for a whole season.

    It's not all bad, but I'm not sure why I'm watching it, what's this show going to be about? There's nothing to care about and no one to identify with. I want Star Trek to make me think and show us an    I have to give this a low score. It's just not the Star Trek I want it to be. I don't want to watch space explosions and amazing CGI and nothing else interesting for a whole season.

    It's not all bad, but I'm not sure why I'm watching it, what's this show going to be about? There's nothing to care about and no one to identify with. I want Star Trek to make me think and show us an optimisitc vision of humanity. I don't want generic space conflict. I just didn't see anything interesting or thought provoking here.

    Nevertheless, I want to see more, I'm willing to give a show some time to gain it's footing. But CBS please don't put this behind a pay wall. Just make the paywall early access. If it is really Star Trek, and has a real message for humanity, Gene Roddenberry would want it to be over the airwaves.    … Expand
  8. waahaa
    Jan 15, 2018
    10
    star trek discovery.. this show is great, although you have to stick with it as the first 4 episodes kinda feel like nothing new. but i'm now on episode 11 and they are getting into dark territory. id say its the most enjoyable series of any star trek so far. i get the feeling they will kill off a host of characters. there are a few back round characters that will probably step forward instar trek discovery.. this show is great, although you have to stick with it as the first 4 episodes kinda feel like nothing new. but i'm now on episode 11 and they are getting into dark territory. id say its the most enjoyable series of any star trek so far. i get the feeling they will kill off a host of characters. there are a few back round characters that will probably step forward in season 2 i'm guessing. but please stick with this show don't give up too soon. VERY MUCH THE DARKEST TREK SERIES TO DATE.… Expand
  9. AdamKingry
    Jan 11, 2018
    3
    I feel terrible for giving the show a bad review because I really like some of the characters. Rainne Wison was funny and interesting in his role - perfect casting. Also perfect casting is Jason Isaacs as Lorca - completely believable as an experienced, embattled maverick with exceptional leadership skills, dispassionate resolve and cunning, and a moral compass that is a little in the greyI feel terrible for giving the show a bad review because I really like some of the characters. Rainne Wison was funny and interesting in his role - perfect casting. Also perfect casting is Jason Isaacs as Lorca - completely believable as an experienced, embattled maverick with exceptional leadership skills, dispassionate resolve and cunning, and a moral compass that is a little in the grey area.

    The Ash Tyler character is well-acted and well written, but for some reason I'm not buying the chemistry between Ash and Michael yet.

    Sonequa Martin Green does an excellent job as Michael, oscillating between heartfelt emotions and Vulcan reserve. Remember that she hasn't rejected her humanity, and isn't half Vulcan like Spock. She's fully human with all that entails, but can be remarkably focused and calm in a crisis. She has a snappy mathematics ability and has above average combat prowess - evidenced by the fact that she can take down a Klingon who is twice her weight. But she's not a Vulcan and doesn't need to eschew emotion.

    I actually really love her character. She seems like a genuine person and her emotions feel very real to me. Excellent acting. Ash just isn't swashbuckling enough, or stable enough, for me to believe she'd take an interest in him. And I think it's unlikely she'd kiss him with that greasy, scraggly beard.

    Tilly's character is okay. She's quirky and irritatingly upbeat, but she is growing on me. I think her character has potential. She's sort of a Neelix-like character - upbeat, optimistic, overly talkative, and more savvy than she appears.

    I don't like Lt. Saru partially because he's sniveling and irritating, but mostly due to the fact that he's hard to look at. Those tendrals on the back of his skull that pop up and writhe  like little worms when he senses danger actually make me cringe with revulsion.

    I don't like the homosexual couple at all. One is a mean albino and the other is a flat-acting Prince clone with a distracting overbite; but that isn't why I don't like them. I don't like them because their relationship is a propaganda move that was presented to and approved by GLAAD ("a media monitoring organization founded by LGBT people") .

    There has been a systematic and aggressive campaign to pressure production companies to represent the tiny contemporary subculture in numerous, positive, substantive, prolonged, central roles in the media - particularly aimed at markets for families and children, with the central aim of mainstream normalization. I'm not a supporter of propaganda in any form, but I really don't like the idea of special interest groups pressuring production companies, especially when massive overrepresentation is taking place already.

    The matching red pajamas, brushing teeth scene caused me to stop watching for weeks. When I gave the show another shot due to the memorable acting of Sonequa Martin Green, I stopped watching entirely​ at the homosexual kissing scene. I found it to be contrived to the degree that I utterly lost my suspension of disbelief. All I saw was aggressive special interest activism intruding upon a beloved television franchise.

    In typical militant fashion, Wilson Cruz, the overbite doctor, said "We aren't here for [the fan's and viewer's] comfort" and essentially said, if you don't like it, don't watch the show. That's not very business-like, but it may prove to be prophetic if the 200 Metacritic negative  user reviews to 100 positive reviews is any indication of the show's longevity - or the nation's polarization over the issue.

    My suspicion is that the primary fan base just wants to watch the show with their family without any f-bombs or ham-fisted propaganda. I suppose they may need to decide if they want to make a show fans enjoy (and buy) or bow subserviently to the watchful diligence of the GLAAD Gestapo.

    I probably won't watch Season 2 despite the many great performances, interesting storylines and good special effects. Great disappointment from an avid Star Trek fan who has seen every movie and every episode in each incarnation of the franchise.    … Expand
  10. high90
    Jan 18, 2018
    10
    Just watched episode 11 and this show has really hit its stride. Strong performances by the leads a diverse cast and high production values make this one of the only programs on tv worth tuning in to see what happens next. How about everyone who gave this a bad review after one episode shut the f up and give it a chance to breath. Well worth your time if your a sci fi fan.
  11. Grizwald
    Sep 25, 2017
    6
    Pretty good, but not as good as I expected! Writing was generally poor, and the character development patchy as best. Even the special effects were disappointing! BobSmash
  12. prider90
    Jan 31, 2018
    8
    + for the effects
    + for the setting
    - didn't gave me that star trek feeling.
    - plot needs to be more complex
    Overall OK to watch
  13. Byronotron
    Feb 6, 2018
    9
    Star Trek: Discovery is absolutely Star Trek. Every new show has been derided by fans, only to later find their footing and bring in new fans, this show is no different. What is different is that unlike every single other Star Trek show besides TOS, season one is great. It has little stumbles, being a bit too dour compared to the lofty ideals it upholds later in the season, but it gives usStar Trek: Discovery is absolutely Star Trek. Every new show has been derided by fans, only to later find their footing and bring in new fans, this show is no different. What is different is that unlike every single other Star Trek show besides TOS, season one is great. It has little stumbles, being a bit too dour compared to the lofty ideals it upholds later in the season, but it gives us something that few Star Trek shows have, a season long narrative with themes that permeate and surround the show, giving each individual episode more context and meaning to the larger story, which actually works very well for this franchise. Aside from that the acting, special effects, VFX, costumes, sound design, music, direction are all incredible. The writing takes a noticeable and dramatic climb in quality at the end of the first half of the season, and continues into some truly epic and must see sci-fi in the second half. This show WILL go down as another classic sci-if and Star Trek shows, while bringing in a lot of new and younger fans. Long Live the Discovery.… Expand
  14. RMillward
    Feb 6, 2018
    10
    Star Trek Discovery is a bold new vision in the Star Trek Universe, one that has unsettled and even disappointed older fans. Younger, more imaginative viewers, whose experience includes liking Star Trek Enterprise on TV, with its non-episodic story arcs, and the up-to-date trilogy of Star Trek films starring Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto, will appreciate Star Trek Discovery's incredibleStar Trek Discovery is a bold new vision in the Star Trek Universe, one that has unsettled and even disappointed older fans. Younger, more imaginative viewers, whose experience includes liking Star Trek Enterprise on TV, with its non-episodic story arcs, and the up-to-date trilogy of Star Trek films starring Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto, will appreciate Star Trek Discovery's incredible production values and out-of-the-box storytelling. Yes, a lot of very vocal people seem not to care for Star Trek Discovery, but as a lifelong fan of Star Trek (52 years and still counting!), I can tell you this show is among the best the Star Trek franchise has to offer and you owe yourself a look.… Expand
  15. Rissois
    Oct 18, 2017
    7
    I take back my earlier positive review. This show is full of unlikable characters, nonsensical plot devices, and plot holes so vast you could fly a starship through. Great acting and special effects though.
  16. the_nephilim71
    Oct 22, 2017
    10
    I love this show. I've been a fan of Trek for around 40 years and was thrilled when I heard they were making a new show because I've been waiting for a new show for a long time. The actors and characters are great and the stories are interesting. Star Trek: Discovery is like a mixture of Next Generation, Battlestar Galactica and Star Trek (2009) I highly recommend it! 10/10
  17. GodOne
    Oct 6, 2017
    10
    I've never been so happy since TNG, this is the first series with a different atmosphere, more realistic, with a lot of blood, good acting and cinematographic post production levels.
    I have never given 10 to something, this is the first time in my life, there are only 3 episodes for now but they are great.
    People unhappy about this series must have serious mental problems or maybe just    I've never been so happy since TNG, this is the first series with a different atmosphere, more realistic, with a lot of blood, good acting and cinematographic post production levels.
    I have never given 10 to something, this is the first time in my life, there are only 3 episodes for now but they are great.
    People unhappy about this series must have serious mental problems or maybe just trolls trying to sabotate this show.    … Expand
  18. Tallrothen
    Oct 6, 2017
    10
    The next step in the natural evolution of Star Trek.
    A few shady performances from a couple of characters but nothing that takes away from the overall experience. Don't miss it!
  19. kralizeh
    Jan 22, 2018
    10
    Best Star Trek since TNG, different but refreshing plot takes time to develop but does so nicely, I was a bit circumspect about the characters but good character building gets you hooked after a couple of episodes.
  20. Alphastrike
    Feb 7, 2018
    10
    Story and characters are well thought out and progressing well. Engaging and can't wait for more, an amazing addition to the Star Trek series.
  21. NeilDunford
    Jan 29, 2018
    9
    I am not a very sophisticated viewer--of anything. After many, many years, for me, "good" or "not good" comes down to whether I think about a movie or a show the next day. Ninety nine percent of what I watch, on TV or in a movie theatre, goes in one ear and out the other.

    Discovery got off to a slow start for me and I don't strongly disagree with many of the negative reviews. Its    I am not a very sophisticated viewer--of anything. After many, many years, for me, "good" or "not good" comes down to whether I think about a movie or a show the next day. Ninety nine percent of what I watch, on TV or in a movie theatre, goes in one ear and out the other.

    Discovery got off to a slow start for me and I don't strongly disagree with many of the negative reviews. Its format and pace are very different from past versions of Trek--I have mostly enjoyed the different series but I wouldn't qualify as a Trekkie. However, after about the 3rd episode of Discovery, I can't wait for the following week's episode. The last couple of episodes have left me at the edge of my chair counting down the days until the next installment. I wouldn't have said Bravo in months, but, I will now. Take it or leave it. But if you are considering diving in...prepare yourself to persevere through the first few episode, then, get ready for a fun ride.    … Expand
  22. slimshadi
    Feb 7, 2018
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Great show, times have moved on and this is great modern trek. Hope Lorca comes back.… Expand
  23. Dont4get2wipe77
    Feb 1, 2018
    7
    I actually liked this show. Nothing special and a bit rough around the edges but I personally enjoyed it. I see mine isn’t a popular opinion and I’m seeing a pattern. This show, and several other recent remakes, revamps or belated sequels would have probably been a lot better received by audiences if they hadn’t cashed in on an existing, beloved franchise. Let’s face it most plot points,I actually liked this show. Nothing special and a bit rough around the edges but I personally enjoyed it. I see mine isn’t a popular opinion and I’m seeing a pattern. This show, and several other recent remakes, revamps or belated sequels would have probably been a lot better received by audiences if they hadn’t cashed in on an existing, beloved franchise. Let’s face it most plot points, set pieces etc etc are pretty much interchangeable within a genre. My point is that if the producers had let the creative team actually come up with their own premises, ideas and characters instead of relentlessly rehashing old ideas then a new and exciting franchise could have been born. Or crashed, burned and fizzled our after one season but you know what? That’s the nature of the beast. That’s what keeps people interested. While I definitely didn’t hate Star Trek discovery personally, I can understand why people feel let down. I honestly think that if the exact same team that made STD (wow unfortunate acronym) had made a new, original sci-fi series it would have been great. Sadly it seems that creative and innovative ideas are growing rarer every year. By the time I die I’ll probably have watched Star Wars episode 87b. And **** hated that one too.… Expand
  24. xortim
    Feb 20, 2019
    10
    A lot of users are rating it poorly after just one episode or by the fact that CBS is charging money for a clearly high budget show.

    This is a different Star Trek because this is a different decade than when the others aired. The way we tell stories now is entirely different than how we told stories in the early aughts, 90s and 60s. Some common critiques: The Klingons looks    A lot of users are rating it poorly after just one episode or by the fact that CBS is charging money for a clearly high budget show.

    This is a different Star Trek because this is a different decade than when the others aired. The way we tell stories now is entirely different than how we told stories in the early aughts, 90s and 60s.

    Some common critiques:
    The Klingons looks different - yup, they also didn't have any prosthetics in TOS
    The technology looks too advanced for it to take place before TOS - I really don't want to watch actors push radio shack buttons glued onto cardboard in a show produced this side of of the millennium.
    Not everyone is an altruistic blowhard, Gene Roddenberry would not approve! - meh, the main character is annoyingly moral and so is the first Captain we encounter.
    It's too politically charged- have you watched any Star Trek, ever? People lost their **** over Dax having the first broadcast "lesbian" kiss, or how about a black bridge officer, let alone a woman Captain. The show has always pushed progressive politics in one way or another, and there's always been someone to object and fold their arms saying "that just ain't right"

    Some genuine criticism are things like:
    Too much or inconsistent camera movement
    Some characters can be annoying at times (true of any show)

    Plus, Tilly is amazing and everyone should watch it for that reason alone.    … Expand
  25. jimjohnson3311
    Feb 24, 2019
    0
    I waited until it came out on Blu Ray. I have been a Star Trek fan for decades... that died with discovery
  26. PGTips5nz
    Mar 7, 2019
    0
    Star Trek: Diversity. Absolutely terrible. Watched the first few episodes, but had to switch it off after that. SJW nonsense.
  27. ScottNAtlanta1
    Mar 8, 2019
    10
    This season is miles ahead better than the first season and I am really enjoying how they are paying homage to the original series.
  28. BarbaraS
    Nov 29, 2017
    6
    My husband and I very much looked forward to this new series and we really wanted to like it. So we tried to focus on the positive sides, like some of the interesting characters. But After 7 episodes we must conclude that it is a big disappointment.

    The storylines are very bad. The technology is inconsistent with all the previous shows. The speed of the episodes is tiring. It is too    My husband and I very much looked forward to this new series and we really wanted to like it. So we tried to focus on the positive sides, like some of the interesting characters. But After 7 episodes we must conclude that it is a big disappointment.

    The storylines are very bad. The technology is inconsistent with all the previous shows. The speed of the episodes is tiring. It is too dark and violent: countless tortures and killings in each episode. The Klingons are no Klingons in both appearance and behaviour. Klingons are honourable warriors, but in this series they resemble underhand Cardassians. Very disappointing. I hate the unfriendly sarcasm in the dialogues. This doesn't fit with the harmonious integrity among the crew of Star Trek ships, which is one of the things why I am a fan.

    I keep watching because I hope that it will improve. I would love to enjoy a good new Star Trek series with intelligent stories about interesting ethical problems, in the ideal world of the Federation. That is what we like about Star Trek and that is what's missing in this series.

    --addition--
    It gets much better after episode 7. Therefore I changed my score from 4 to 6. I recommend to skip the first seven episodes. In episodes 8 and 9 it finally starts feeling more like Star Trek again. It's still badly written, each episode still has actions that don't make any sense, we still miss depth in the stories, we miss Federation ethics, and the inconsistent technology and weird Klingons remain a shame. But we did enjoy these last two episodes better. We absolutely love main character Michael, she is great. Saru as well. And Tilly and other characters are growing on me. I have good hopes that it will keep improving.

    To the writers, director and producers of the show, please listen to the criticisms! Please involve Trekkies with the writing!    … Expand
  29. pissedtrekky
    Feb 21, 2019
    5
    I'm a long time trek fan and Discovery had my attention up to the last three episodes. the last episode i shut off after that science geek guy said how he was going to miss his bf's sexy scar! I'm not sure who there target audience is supposed to be but I've seen daytime soaps that were less gay. The first season was pretty good and the start of this season then they started to over actI'm a long time trek fan and Discovery had my attention up to the last three episodes. the last episode i shut off after that science geek guy said how he was going to miss his bf's sexy scar! I'm not sure who there target audience is supposed to be but I've seen daytime soaps that were less gay. The first season was pretty good and the start of this season then they started to over act everything and turned up the homosexual volume and tried to push the humor where it feels labored at best. did they change the director or something? what's with all the looking at each other all the time the dramatic pause like in soaps. and why all the man love bull/ is this the brokeback mountain star trek? and who else is sick of looking at the first officer's face? it looks like a vjj! I guess i'm going to go finish watching it but i'm hoping vjj face gets killed on this episode and if the science geek and the doc that came back from the dead kiss again i'm done! I can't believe they're ruining this.… Expand
  30. shoulderoforion
    Sep 25, 2017
    6
    the show was better than i expected it to be, the klingons were awful, but the space battles were mint. i'm in, i'll be adding this to my weekly schedule. boldly.
Page:

Awards & Rankings

80
#80 Best TV Season of 2017
1
#1 Most Discussed TV Season of 2017
9
#9 Most Shared TV Season of 2017

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
72

Generally favorable reviews - based on 20 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 15 out of 20
  2. Mixed: 5 out of 20
  3. Negative: 0 out of 20
  1. The New York Times
    Reviewed by: James Poniewozik
    Oct 19, 2017
    50
    Discovery feels like it’s adrift between the adventure-of-the-week format of its network-TV predecessors and the kind of complex serial favored by cable and streaming.
    Read full review
  2. The Oregonian
    Reviewed by: Kristi Turnquist
    Sep 26, 2017
    60
    Star Trek: Discovery feels like it's just finding its footing. On the promising side, Doug Jones is already a standout as Science Officer Lt. Saru, who's from an alien race called Kelpiens. And James Frain is perfectly cast as Sarek, the Vulcan who veteran "Trek" fans know as the father of Spock. The relationship between Burnham and Sarek is one of the more intriguing aspects of Star Trek: Discovery.
    Read full review
  3. Salon
    Reviewed by: Melanie McFarland
    Sep 26, 2017
    80
    Happily Star Trek: Discovery strikes a balance between what diehard Trekkies love about Roddenberry’s universe and what J.J. Abrams injected into its theatrical resurrection. Ethical dilemmas and a clash between cultures and traditions comprise the fore of the narrative, but the hours don’t skimp on phaser blasts and broadcast-appropriate carnage.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »