User Score
Universal acclaim- based on 474 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 406 out of 474
-
Mixed: 19 out of 474
-
Negative: 49 out of 474
Review this tv show
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
User Reviews
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
gregoryfJan 24, 2010What a piece of crap! Bad CG, bad dialogue, bad acting, and bad directing. A poor attempt to rip off 300, Gladiator, and Rome. I cant believe Starz order a second season of this garbage already. What a joke!
-
-
BobD.Jan 27, 2010This show looks like it was written and directed by a 13 year old boy. It is horrible and unwatchable.
-
-
EliasC.Jan 22, 2010
-
-
EricaL.Jan 27, 2010If only the nudity was toned down I could possibly sit through the show, too bad.
-
-
Jan 26, 2011This series is totally unrealistic and full of historical mistakes, yes I know it is a fiction, but it should remain at least plausible, virtually the entire series is shot in computer graphics, spurts of blood every 5 minutes, the acting is really poor, you feel nothing real in this series, apart from the pretty girls who are often bare;-)) I do not really see anything else of interest...
-
Apr 21, 2011
-
Nov 25, 2011Looks like a Xena: warrior princess episode with gay soft porn in it. This show is all about making money out of the 300 trend without spending too much on scenarists, actors, director. Look elsewhere for historical accuracy.
-
Jan 23, 2012
-
Nov 17, 2010This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
BobF.Jan 30, 2010Reminded me of the ridiculously funny Monty Python episode with the genteel sitting around a piano with copius amounts of blood. Have to agree with the comment about it seeming to have been written by a 13 year old.
-
-
ChristineKJan 24, 2010Spartacus: Utter BS, and I don't mean blood OR sand.
-
-
C.D.Jan 25, 2010I was expecting something more...That had to be the biggest turd of a show. Horrible writing, acting, special effects. I couldn't stop laughing, not because it was funny, but because it was supposed to be serious. Watch at your own risk.
-
-
TonyS.Jan 29, 2010
-
-
LoriEJan 24, 2010WOW! As an adult viewer that can handle CG and even respect the wonderful technology, in short bursts, this was way over the top. What an overall disappointment. I really was looking forward to this, as a movie goer that really loved the original movie, it was a great shock to see how they, so far, have ruined it!! I won't be watching the rest. How sad.
-
-
ForrestBJan 26, 2010
-
-
JohnS.Jan 28, 2010
-
-
Jan 28, 2012
-
Dec 21, 2015Scary bad acting, painfully wooden and desperately archaic dialogue and home-made special effects (the show would most likely be better without them) all generously sprinkled, humped and plastered with nudity and borderline soft-core pornography. If you are a teenage boy this is best show ever, but only then. Waste of time!
-
May 6, 2018This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
Awards & Rankings
-
After artistic duds like the TV version of "Crash," Starz may have found its destination series in Spartacus. This might prove to be the not-at-all-guilty pleasure of the season.
-
Though the violence is designed to be gorgeous, like a graphic novel, it doesn’t have the pacing of a comic book. The creators of Spartacus: Blood and Sand seem a little too enamored of their ability to sketch a vast Thracian tableau, a fight scene, or a coliseum full of cheering CGI Italians.
-
After Spartacus blows most of its special-effects budget on the pilot, it settles into a not-bad sword-and-sandal genre series, a la "Xena" or "Hercules."