- Network: Netflix
- Series Premiere Date: Feb 7, 2018
Critic Reviews
- Critic score
- Publication
- By date
-
The ending’s always pretty predictable, in the best way. ... The group as a whole embody a natural chemistry, though Jonathan Van Ness becomes a clear standout.
-
It is great, great TV. Much credit goes to the group of highly watchable experts, whose breakout stars include Karamo, a satin-swathed bro whisperer; Jonathan, a whirligig of sass and kilts and moisturizing wisdom; and Antoni, the self-consciously pretty boy and supposed food whiz. Their targets are nicely varied and likable, too.
-
Come for the serial reveals, stay for the life lessons. (Don't judge a book by its cover. Pick up your room.) Or come for the lessons and stay for the reveals. It works either way.
-
It’s a formula, but damned if it doesn’t do the job and generate the tears, most of them happy.
-
The lack of bitchiness admittedly makes this Queer Eye a little less funny than the first; most of the comedy weight is provided by Van Ness, the most quick-witted of the group. But all five of the consultants are likable and go out of their way to match their guidance to the interests and circumstances of the men they advise. ... Engaging.
-
The world now seems less binary, and the show has grown more limber and less campy.
-
If no one in the new Fab Five stands out like original fan faves Carson Kressley or Jai Rodriguez (save grooming expert Jonathan Van Ness for his obnoxious attempts to become a meme), the straight guys are surprisingly memorable.
-
It’s a tasty reality TV smoothie: part food show, part real estate show, part makeover show, part matchmaking show, part therapy, and sweet throughout.
-
The Queer Eye reboot finds perhaps even more pathos than the original one. The transformation in the premiere episode is a heartwarming hoot. But with a cast of attention-seeking experts who too often steal focus from the proverbial mission at hand, it can be as exhausting and, at times, even as cringe-inducing as some have feared.
Awards & Rankings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 45 out of 69
-
Mixed: 3 out of 69
-
Negative: 21 out of 69
-
Feb 8, 2018
-
Feb 20, 2018This review contains spoilers, click full review link to view.
-
Feb 16, 2018Overacted cheesy stereotypes regurgitated for the masses - None of the 'characters' are remotely interesting or even funny! ... don't bother