• Network: Netflix
  • Series Premiere Date: Dec 12, 2014
Season #: 2, 1
User Score
8.0

Generally favorable reviews- based on 499 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Negative: 57 out of 499
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Stream On
Stream On

Review this tv show

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

User Reviews

  1. Mar 28, 2020
    7
    Marco Polo (2014) Season 1 Review: 7/10
    Very nice and enjoyable show. Great plot and stunning visuals.
  2. Apr 16, 2019
    9
    Good fights, good acting and it looks great. This show is so underrated and deserved better. Desperately needs a season 3.
  3. Apr 30, 2017
    10
    I was really enjoying the show and had watched the two seasons. What a pity that they have pulled the plug as the ratings were not good. I guess the ratings have improved since then. Netflix should reconsider their decision.
  4. Feb 13, 2017
    3
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I was very disappointed in this show. It started out well, and there were flashes of brilliance here and there, but the plot trudged along at a snail's pace. The show was padded with lots of gratuitous sex and violence that distracted from the plot. Honestly, if I wanted to watch porn, I would have just watched porn. I don't need to take a ten minute porn break from my historical drama every fifteen minutes. The sets are beautiful, and I have no fault with the acting, but the plot is simply sub par.

    Some have compared this show to A Game of Thrones, but the two are nothing alike. The sex and violence in A Game of Thrones are always in the context of the show's plot, and the situations are consistent with the participants' character. The most violent scenes are often the climax of an arc that was built up over several episodes. In Marco Polo, on the other hand, the sex and violence are so commonplace that they lose their impact. For example, there is a banquet that Marco Polo attends. Kublai Khan has instructed him to pay attention and report on what he sees. So what brilliant insights does he have? Well, he immediately gets into a wrestling match with a random girl for no apparent reason, and it quickly turns into sex for no apparent reason. Oh, and it later turns out that she's the clan chief's "virgin" daughter. Yeah, right. This is a thirteen year old boy's dream scenario, not the content of a coherent plot in a show for adults.

    There are plenty of women to be had, and the Khan has promised Marco free access to his harem if he can prove his trustworthiness. However, Marco instead fixates on the one royal hostage who has been declared off-limits. He spends 75% of his time on the show stalking her, and her supposed bodyguard seems to be 100% oblivious to Marco's activities. Most of the show's plot seems to focus on this ridiculous situation.

    I was able to endure four episodes of this nonsense before giving up. I was tempted to call it quits earlier, but every time I felt I had had enough the show would pull me back in with actual intrigue and beautiful sets. If only they had focused more on the geopolitical aspects and the relationship between Marco and the Khan, I think the show would have been pretty good, if not great. Unfortunately, I just couldn't spend any more time watching the story of a creepy stalker and his relationship with a temperamental psychopath who somehow refrains from killing him despite countless provocations.
    Expand
  5. Feb 8, 2017
    10
    My feeling on this show cannot be described...this is the first time I have been so hooked for a decade...perhaps since the remake of Battlestar Galactica...I really haven't seen a quality series like this forever!

    As someone who has lived in the east and absorbed the culture its really a surprising and respectful effort. I love the genuine and hard battles Marco has to pursue in his
    My feeling on this show cannot be described...this is the first time I have been so hooked for a decade...perhaps since the remake of Battlestar Galactica...I really haven't seen a quality series like this forever!

    As someone who has lived in the east and absorbed the culture its really a surprising and respectful effort.

    I love the genuine and hard battles Marco has to pursue in his course, sometimes he lacks real character though it could be said he is not always the central role in this play.

    It really is a beautiful theatre. I love the attention to the ancient art of war and the landscapes make a fitting backdrop. The music is perfect and unique as well as great costume design and cinematography.

    I really feel the criticism of the critics is due to the hardness and unforgiving nature of the show though they fail to realise how much it gives to strong female leads and moral code. I hope people can see past the critics and see Marco Polo for what it really is...a fantastic and fantastical adventure.
    Expand
  6. Sep 29, 2016
    10
    This show is awesome, the dialogue is great and fight scenes are amazing. There are so many historical truths in this store too (although there is plenty of artistic liberties as well).

    Overall a great show and definitely worth watching.
  7. Jul 25, 2016
    9
    This show has its ups and downs, and I'll admit it's not for everybody. But if you like martial arts movies and historical drama, you should watch this. I've watched kung fu movies my whole life, and I think that some of the fights in this series compare very well with the best fights in the movies. The character Hundred Eyes is the best, and fights beautifully. There's another martialThis show has its ups and downs, and I'll admit it's not for everybody. But if you like martial arts movies and historical drama, you should watch this. I've watched kung fu movies my whole life, and I think that some of the fights in this series compare very well with the best fights in the movies. The character Hundred Eyes is the best, and fights beautifully. There's another martial arts TV show, Into the Badlands, that's even more directly martial-arts themed, yet has much worse fights.

    Other points: The sets are incredible, and obviously expensive. I'm no Mongol expert, but I have a better than average knowledge of world history and military history, and I think the series as a whole has a good, historical feel. Sometimes the show can drag, and you're more or less waiting for something to happen. Other times a scene is so cool that I watch it again immediately.
    Expand
  8. Jul 19, 2016
    10
    Starts slow and gets better and better then. Similar as the show -Vkings-. Characters are fleshed out superbly and develop in interesting and surprising ways.

    Of course historical accuracy is not the shows strength, but who would really want that? Maybe the "professional" critics, who rated this show so lowly? Quite sure most of these "professionals" haven't seen more than one and a
    Starts slow and gets better and better then. Similar as the show -Vkings-. Characters are fleshed out superbly and develop in interesting and surprising ways.

    Of course historical accuracy is not the shows strength, but who would really want that?

    Maybe the "professional" critics, who rated this show so lowly? Quite sure most of these "professionals" haven't seen more than one and a half episodes... But well like most people know by now, user ratings are way better to determine the quality of a show.
    Expand
  9. Jul 16, 2016
    10
    Absolutely love it! The visuals are stunning, I love Mongolian history and that show totally delivers. Michelle Yeaoh & Tom Wu doing Kung Fu is also a treat! I honestly don't know what those critics are thinking in rating this TV show. Give it a shot. Season 1 is okay but Season 2?? I'm blown away.
  10. Jul 14, 2016
    10
    I dont know why critics gave such a bad review, this series are better than The walking dead and Game of thrones. TWD and GOT started very well but now are kinda boring. These series arent. I seriously recommend you to see it and ignore critics, they probably dont know what they're talking about
  11. Jul 13, 2016
    4
    Whenever you watch anything 'fantastical' on television, or in the cinema, you have to switch off the more rational part of your brain and just go with the notion that what you're witnessing falls into the scope of the show/film as it's set up and progresses.
    But therein lies the problem with Marco Polo, it's a television show about a recognised historical figure, one of actual
    Whenever you watch anything 'fantastical' on television, or in the cinema, you have to switch off the more rational part of your brain and just go with the notion that what you're witnessing falls into the scope of the show/film as it's set up and progresses.
    But therein lies the problem with Marco Polo, it's a television show about a recognised historical figure, one of actual importance, but it is written and produced using only the slightest amount of known historical fact.
    What that means is we witness completely fictitious characters and events that have no basis in what actually did happen when this Portuguese trader ended up in Mongolia in the 13th Century, it's just turned into blatant 'popcorn' escapism, and it's frustrating.

    So, is there anything good about the programme?
    Well, the direction is good, the cinematography is nice, the set design is well done, as is the costume design. From a visual perspective, you are wowed by the effort put into the production.
    But that's really about it....

    What is bad then?
    I understand that the show is funded by Americans, for Americans... And we know the 'average' American is generally too stupid to understand the world extends beyond their own 50 States.... But having everyone speaking English destroys any sense of atmosphere. I don't understand why the people making the show would go to such great lengths to make things 'look' so good if, whenever someone starts speaking, they speak a language that they clearly shouldn't be.
    Add to that some dubious casting choices (why do 90% of the Mongolians look Chinese/Japanese?), some terrible action choreography (every action scene, on pretty much every scale, is shot in near darkness), and huge lulls in pacing.... And you get a show which is watchable, but only if you switch off your brain completely.

    Oh, and as pointed out earlier.... Don't go into this show thinking it's something you can use to really find things out about its particular era and 'real life' characters..... It's 99% fiction.
    Expand
  12. Jun 9, 2016
    10
    Hate when critics get it wrong. This is an excellent show that displays a new era and area of history we dont often see, in a premium cable night time tele sort of way. Its every bit as good as some of these other shows, its just in its infancy. The cast is awesome, giving a lot of underrated asian talent a spotlight they wouldnt otherwise gain. Dont let those who hate it outweigh theHate when critics get it wrong. This is an excellent show that displays a new era and area of history we dont often see, in a premium cable night time tele sort of way. Its every bit as good as some of these other shows, its just in its infancy. The cast is awesome, giving a lot of underrated asian talent a spotlight they wouldnt otherwise gain. Dont let those who hate it outweigh the voice of your fellow viewers. The positive to negative for viewers at the time of this writing is 356 positive to 38 negative, with 24 mixed. So out of almost 420 viewers, 40 or so hated or didnt like it and 20 or so were iffy, the rest loved or at least liked it. We're talking 90% approval at an avg score of 8.3. Thats a damn good show... Expand
  13. Mar 15, 2016
    10
    A fine example of 'Known' reviewers a their poorest. Did they even watch this series?

    Amazing show, with a great storyline, good characters, great acting and amazing visuals. Can't wait for Season 2.

    Fck you reviewers.
  14. Feb 26, 2016
    9
    Very good show, it reminds me a lot of Game Of Thrones except without the magic and dragons. Nonetheless, I recommend watching it for the martial arts and the cinematography.
  15. Feb 8, 2016
    9
    I absolutely loved the show and sometimes wonder if the critics have been watching the same show that I have binge watched for the last 3 days. The scenes and the colours are so vivid, it kind of transported me back to Kublai Khan's era and ancient Mongolia. The pace is just right if you want to learn about a culture most are not familiar with in order to accompany the story that picks upI absolutely loved the show and sometimes wonder if the critics have been watching the same show that I have binge watched for the last 3 days. The scenes and the colours are so vivid, it kind of transported me back to Kublai Khan's era and ancient Mongolia. The pace is just right if you want to learn about a culture most are not familiar with in order to accompany the story that picks up quite soon. All characters are likeable in their own way. I thought Lorenzo Richelmy's Marco Polo was a bit dull to start with, but I am getting used to him, and now that I learned he was thought English for the show only, it kind of makes more sense that he became more believable towards the middle of the season, but whatever Marco Polo lacks in English skills, all the other actors compensate in amazing performances, the cinematography is perfect, the characters are deep and their story gets you completely involved.
    Needless to say, I am hooked.
    Expand
  16. Feb 6, 2016
    10
    i like it just fine, but the important thing to take away from this is how utterly useless "professional" critics are in deciding what one might like in film and TV. (or games or art for that matter.) long live the great unwashed.
  17. Jan 20, 2016
    10
    The critics had to review this show based on the first few episodes. But even this doesn't fully explain their ridiculous under-rating of this magnificent series.
    The sets are gorgeous, the production value amazing, the plot engaging and the characters layered. This is almost impeccable TV.
  18. Dec 5, 2015
    0
    This show makes me sick. It is just knockoff Game of Thrones, orientalism version. The tragedy is the show is not based on fantasy fiction. But you know nothing Jon Snow... This show is joke. I am so disappointed in Netflix.
  19. Nov 23, 2015
    10
    Very good show all in all despite an average lead, the rest of the cast is stellar, the production is amazing, the sets are splendid, I can't wait for season 2!
  20. Nov 10, 2015
    10
    Fantastic show, which great depth and cinematography. I have no clue what the 'official' critics are thinking, they must be stoned or just have utterly **** taste in shows. This is a fantastic series, if you have any interest in historical shows this is one of the best to watch, set in a very unique time period.

    Bring on Season 2.
  21. Jul 24, 2015
    9
    highly recommended if you are looking for drama
    pros: Great drama, good politics, enjoyable characters.
    cons: lack of action scenes until the very last episodes.
  22. Jul 6, 2015
    10
    One of my favorite shows since Spartacus season 1, I don't understand why the critics are going so hard on the negative reviews, this show is awesome. You get attached to some great characters..Like the bald monk, marco polo, some of the khans sons and the khan himself
  23. May 28, 2015
    10
    I'm used to seeing poor reviews by critics on fantasy style shows, but It was very disheartening to see the reviews here. The show took a bit to rev up, and it can drag on. It has issues, but at the end of the day, it is a fun adventure. There are not that many shows that catch me so quick and keep me up an hour or two after my bedtime every night, to watch the show. This one did that.I'm used to seeing poor reviews by critics on fantasy style shows, but It was very disheartening to see the reviews here. The show took a bit to rev up, and it can drag on. It has issues, but at the end of the day, it is a fun adventure. There are not that many shows that catch me so quick and keep me up an hour or two after my bedtime every night, to watch the show. This one did that. While it stumbles from time to time, overall, it is outstanding.

    Yes, it can be campy, No, the acting isn't always top notch. But, the premise, and the surprising attention to history is uncanny. I am interested in seeing where the show goes after the first season.
    Expand
  24. Apr 28, 2015
    3
    I'm disappointed. Marco Polo wasn't a Marvel hero. He was a real man. I wanted a credibly historic serie here, not the Nth version of American ninja. Mongol girl fighters? Come on, that is the most ridiculous historic abuse ever seen.
  25. Apr 13, 2015
    10
    A thoroughly enjoyable show with completely unwarranted critic reviews. I was relieved when I saw that Netflix had signed for a second series.

    The fact that so many people talk about this in the same breath as GOT speaks for itself. The production is top notch and the story gripping. The characters are all likeable and actually believable. The season finale is an absolute epic - I'd
    A thoroughly enjoyable show with completely unwarranted critic reviews. I was relieved when I saw that Netflix had signed for a second series.

    The fact that so many people talk about this in the same breath as GOT speaks for itself. The production is top notch and the story gripping. The characters are all likeable and actually believable.

    The season finale is an absolute epic - I'd definitely recommend this and this proves to me once again just how out of touch critic reviews can be.
    Expand
  26. Mar 20, 2015
    5
    Anyone who expected a historic drama know this; Marco Polo is a fantasy show taking place in an imaginary world based on the stereotypical (and mostly inaccruate) view of Asia. BS everywhere. Those who have the slightest clue of Asian culture and history would find this seires unbearably clumsy. Aside from that, the show itself is okay.
  27. Mar 20, 2015
    8
    It's clear that the professional critics simply can't handle something that doesn't fit the usual mold. The show is very well cast and filmed with an eye for history, and for once we have a production that casts actors in keeping with their actual heritage instead of a white washed history in British accents (::cough:: Da Vinci's Demons and Prince of Persia ::cough::). This is Game ofIt's clear that the professional critics simply can't handle something that doesn't fit the usual mold. The show is very well cast and filmed with an eye for history, and for once we have a production that casts actors in keeping with their actual heritage instead of a white washed history in British accents (::cough:: Da Vinci's Demons and Prince of Persia ::cough::). This is Game of Thrones in the far east, except that many of the show's events are real. There are certainly a lot of borrowed tropes and a bit of fantastical kung fu, but it also often refuses to take the easy road. The protagonists are both brutal and empathetic, and the conflicts between characters are very believable. The primary villain is a bit too dastardly in my mind, especially since he's fighting against a Mongol invasion. But the show is very good and is easy to watch. Expand
  28. Feb 23, 2015
    10
    I have a lot to say about why I love this show. Here's my reddit rant on why: http://redd.it/2pvz17

    "Jia Sidao and Thousand Eyes are very similar and could be considered foils in some degree. Ying and Yang, Confucianism and Taoism. They both accomplish great skill through hard work, which 100 Eyes tells us is the meaning of kung fu (did not know that and I'm a huge Chinese culture
    I have a lot to say about why I love this show. Here's my reddit rant on why: http://redd.it/2pvz17

    "Jia Sidao and Thousand Eyes are very similar and could be considered foils in some degree. Ying and Yang, Confucianism and Taoism. They both accomplish great skill through hard work, which 100 Eyes tells us is the meaning of kung fu (did not know that and I'm a huge Chinese culture aficionado). One's mind is in bondage, another's is not. Thousand Eyes is powerless, yet he has power. Jia Sidao has power, yet he is powerless. Jia Sidao is soft (emotional wounds), so he must be hard. Thousand Eyes is hard, because he is soft.

    I watched this season again and the fact that their characters blossom and engage my imagination such that the characters grow before me is a true gift. Thank You Netflix.
    Expand
  29. Feb 17, 2015
    10
    I don't understand you guys low rating for this show its one of the best shows I have seen in a few years. But then again when you guys give better grades to shows like blackish and American Idol what can we expect.
  30. Feb 15, 2015
    10
    What is with these critics on here!? Rave reviews for utter garbage and poor reviews for anything with any quality content. This is one of those that deserves a FAAAAAAAAR better rating than its getting. The acting is good. The setting and cinematography are very good. The storyline is good. Its a winner by all accounts. Deserves a solid 7 IMO, but gets a 10 due to the low critic rating.What is with these critics on here!? Rave reviews for utter garbage and poor reviews for anything with any quality content. This is one of those that deserves a FAAAAAAAAR better rating than its getting. The acting is good. The setting and cinematography are very good. The storyline is good. Its a winner by all accounts. Deserves a solid 7 IMO, but gets a 10 due to the low critic rating. Please.... Expand
  31. Feb 5, 2015
    9
    This show is fantastic. I have no idea what all these critics were watching but this show has been excellent so far. It has only gotten better with each episode.
  32. Jan 31, 2015
    4
    By Episode Three, I found myself far more interested in following Benedict Wong as Kublai than Lorenzo Richelmy as Marco Polo, which probably isn't a good sign if the latter is supposed to be the central figure of the show. Richelmy's performance as Marco was flat, forgettable and uninspired. Even Chin Han was more compelling. By the time Marco started developing the obligatory loveBy Episode Three, I found myself far more interested in following Benedict Wong as Kublai than Lorenzo Richelmy as Marco Polo, which probably isn't a good sign if the latter is supposed to be the central figure of the show. Richelmy's performance as Marco was flat, forgettable and uninspired. Even Chin Han was more compelling. By the time Marco started developing the obligatory love interest that must carry otherwise mediocre scripts along, the boredom outweighed any interest in seeing more breathtaking views and fighting. Four out of 10 simply for Wong's work, the fight scenes and choreography. Expand
  33. Jan 29, 2015
    5
    I report to you two episodes in to this Weinstein Company, Netflix Original. I had been pulled in by my slightly morbid fascination with the Mongol Empire and the chance to see Benedict Wong, the ultra-gentle ping-pong wizard ‘Errol’ in Sean Lock’s brilliant Fifteen Stories High, as megalomaniac warlord Kublai Kahn, grandson of Genghis. How on earth could Errol be Kublai? How could thoseI report to you two episodes in to this Weinstein Company, Netflix Original. I had been pulled in by my slightly morbid fascination with the Mongol Empire and the chance to see Benedict Wong, the ultra-gentle ping-pong wizard ‘Errol’ in Sean Lock’s brilliant Fifteen Stories High, as megalomaniac warlord Kublai Kahn, grandson of Genghis. How on earth could Errol be Kublai? How could those two things be possible?

    It begins with the Polo entourage adventuring through a village in the aftermath of an invasion. Everyone is either charred or impaled and there’s a general air of misery and terror...As the Polos inspect the ruins they are ambushed, taken prisoner and delivered to the court of The Great Khan. Here we see Benedict Wong as Kublai for the first time. In vast contrast to his grandfather Genghis, Kublai was born into wealth and power and, just like all people who are born into privilege, he dresses like a magnificent buffoon (see Gaddafi’s sons or Gogglebox’s Dom Parker). The Polos are stood before him, waiting for him to speak. But Benedict Wong does not speak. Instead, when he finally opens his mouth, we realise he has been dubbed by Al Pacino, asked to give an Eastern twang to his Tony Montana. It sounds as brilliant as it is ridiculous and with that accent, a few minutes in, the viewer learns: this show is gonna be stupid. No lessons shall be learned, there shall be no great satire here. But it might be fun.

    And so the vapid Marco joins Kublai and onward we go into this confused mesh of show as it intertwines the cinematic traditions of the East and West into a bastardisation of culture and history that would make George R. Martin say, ‘Woah there’. Along with Tony Montana as Kublai and the lazy intercultural love story...It feels like it’s all been done before, just in a different accent. The production values are as strong as you would expect from the Weinsteins, Wong is highly enjoyable as Kublai and there’s a pace to the narrative that gives you little time to be concerned with how naff the content is, but it’s a big disappointment.

    Full review at ponderflix on wordpress.
    Expand
  34. Jan 26, 2015
    9
    An excellent show, with beautifully designed visual materials. The portrayal of the Mongol and Chinese empires, both at peace and at war is a rare enough delight to merit watching the program on its own. Though some licence is taken with the historical materials, the complex culture and politics of the Khanate of Kublai is well realized. Finally, the cast starts quietly, but overall thereAn excellent show, with beautifully designed visual materials. The portrayal of the Mongol and Chinese empires, both at peace and at war is a rare enough delight to merit watching the program on its own. Though some licence is taken with the historical materials, the complex culture and politics of the Khanate of Kublai is well realized. Finally, the cast starts quietly, but overall there are a host of interesting and well developed characters. Marco himself is a relatively quiet character, but he provides a good framing device to highlight a variety of multifaceted characters and talented actors.

    I find the initial episode started somewhat slowly, but not unpleasantly so, and the pacing picks up over the following episodes. Given that most viewers are probably not familiar with the Mongol empire, I think this is a wise decision.

    Overall, Marco Polo is well worth watching, and at least on par with the history channel's "Vikings" series. I find it difficult to reconcile my own assessment with the critical reviews of Marco Polo. I have never been struck by this strong a contrast, I wonder if they might have been watching another program.
    Expand
  35. Jan 24, 2015
    10
    The action, acting, views and historical significance makes this show such a spectacle to behold. I don't usually crave to watch a series back to back but Marco Polo demanded it with its amazing story and tempting narrative.
    If you want a series that will hold your attention from start to finish then I suggest that you give this amazing show a chance. At the end of the day, this show was
    The action, acting, views and historical significance makes this show such a spectacle to behold. I don't usually crave to watch a series back to back but Marco Polo demanded it with its amazing story and tempting narrative.
    If you want a series that will hold your attention from start to finish then I suggest that you give this amazing show a chance. At the end of the day, this show was made for the regular consumers and not the critics.
    I really hope the user rating is leverage enough to act as a counterweight for the critics low score.
    Expand
  36. Jan 23, 2015
    9
    Highly recommended
    I finally watched this series over the past couple days after being initially discouraged by the critic reviews. It was well worth it. It turned out to be very engaging if at times somewhat predictable. The unfavorable comparisons with Games of Thrones are off the mark. Surely the similarities do exist with excellent settings, beautiful costumes and developed characters
    Highly recommended
    I finally watched this series over the past couple days after being initially discouraged by the critic reviews. It was well worth it. It turned out to be very engaging if at times somewhat predictable. The unfavorable comparisons with Games of Thrones are off the mark. Surely the similarities do exist with excellent settings, beautiful costumes and developed characters but with none of the droning dialogue, mediocre acting and cluttered storylines that made GoT a cure for insomnia. Marco Polo does lack the shock value that makes GoT interesting but by sticking to the core story we get a focused effort that marches relentlessly towards its climax. Every scene is integral to the story. Every grunt is meaningful. Marco Polo is only one of many highly developed characters and my only complaint is that the series should have been named "Kublai Khan." He is the real star and central character, brilliantly rendered by first class acting. The first season does not end on a cliff hanger so give it a go. Its worth it.
    Expand
  37. Jan 22, 2015
    9
    I am hooked! I did have to watch the 1st episode twice to get straight who everyone was. But, now have watched 8 episodes and can't wait to watch the next episode tonite. I really don't understand why the critics did not give it higher reviews? I have recommended to many family members and friends.
  38. Jan 20, 2015
    9
    This is a great show! I've been hooked since the first episode. I have watched the whole first season and can't wait for season two! I like all the characters and have many favorites.
  39. Jan 20, 2015
    10
    Like many others here, I have to take issue with these ridiculous critic reviews. Marco Polo is an extremely solid show, alternately exciting and thought-provoking. It is amazing to have an eye into a culture that many of us have never experienced.

    From a visual point of view, the show is stunning. The scenery, the costumes, the cinematography, all amazing. As with the historical
    Like many others here, I have to take issue with these ridiculous critic reviews. Marco Polo is an extremely solid show, alternately exciting and thought-provoking. It is amazing to have an eye into a culture that many of us have never experienced.

    From a visual point of view, the show is stunning. The scenery, the costumes, the cinematography, all amazing.

    As with the historical novels, the Khan himself is really the center of the show. Superbly acted and extremely sympathetic, I felt his disappointments as thoroughly as I enjoyed his triumphs. A truly amazing job.

    The critics really need to get over themselves. I'm so happy that Netflix listened to the fans and is giving this a second season. Yet another really smart decision on their part-- I'm totally on board.
    Expand
  40. Jan 15, 2015
    2
    Unbelievably bad. It certainly looks like it was expensive to make, so it does look gorgeous, but other than that, there isn't a single positive thing to say about it. The acting is so wooden, even the actor playing Marco Polo fails to be convincing as someone anyone would follow. Although it's hard to tell how much the actors are at fault here. Between the clearly poor direction of scenesUnbelievably bad. It certainly looks like it was expensive to make, so it does look gorgeous, but other than that, there isn't a single positive thing to say about it. The acting is so wooden, even the actor playing Marco Polo fails to be convincing as someone anyone would follow. Although it's hard to tell how much the actors are at fault here. Between the clearly poor direction of scenes and the incredibly corny dialogue, they don't have much to work on. It didn't even have a "so bad it's good" quality, and I had to stop watching after episode 4.

    If anything, the critics were overly kind to this slop. Based on how many of these ridiculously positive user reviews start with "I made an account just to tell you the critics are wrong", I wouldn't be surprised if they were fake accounts made by the production company. Either that, or it's yet more evidence that the quality of television can be complete garbage but spend enough on special effects and the brainless masses won't care.
    Expand
  41. Jan 15, 2015
    9
    I rarely voice my opinion on TV on Metacritic, or anywhere else for that matter, but after seeing the negative critic reviews for Marco Polo I have to say something. I thoroughly enjoyed this show and thought it had good characterization, excellent cinematography, brilliantly choreographed fight sequences that put most films to shame, and a compelling enough story to hold my attentionI rarely voice my opinion on TV on Metacritic, or anywhere else for that matter, but after seeing the negative critic reviews for Marco Polo I have to say something. I thoroughly enjoyed this show and thought it had good characterization, excellent cinematography, brilliantly choreographed fight sequences that put most films to shame, and a compelling enough story to hold my attention throughout. One wonders why the public even needs professional TV critics advising them what to watch when there is often a huge disparity between what the public enjoys and the critics do. Sometimes I think if one well-respected critic pans a film or TV show it will heavily influence and stymie the objectivity of other critics who want to be seen as insightful by their peers. It then starts a snowball-like effect and other critcs just fall into line. The idea that there are a small group of people out there who are better than the public at discerning how good a TV show is, is of course, utter nonsense. And in this case the critics have failed spectacularly as evidenced by the giant chasm in the score above. The public have spoken and Marco Polo is very good and worth watching. It deserves the user-rated score of almost 9 above. Expand
  42. Jan 13, 2015
    10
    Great TV - I don't expect historical dramas to be as entertaining as this is, nor as accurate as it seems.

    It seems we are in the court of the ruler of most of the civilized world at the time, the grandson of an even more accomplished warlord. The Mongol encampment is consistent with modern Mongolian houses that date from antiquity.
  43. Jan 9, 2015
    10
    This is one of my top 3 shows that I have seen on Netflix. It rates right up there with Orange is the new black. Although far from a comedy, it is very entertaining. I do not understand the poor ratings that I have seen. Is there some type of behind the scenes drama going on with the critics that the general public is unaware of?
  44. Jan 9, 2015
    1
    This is an expensive-looking show, but that lavishness is wasted on a dull pilot. The show starts off with a bunch of people we know next to nothing about. We have no reason to care what happens to them, and the pilot does very little to endear them to the viewer. I don't have any interest in watching the remaining episodes.
  45. Jan 8, 2015
    9
    No, it might not be Netflix's Game of Thrones, but there's enough political and sexual intrigue in this well-casted show to make it worth a watch. I found every character compelling enough to be cared about regardless of their side in this war. Even the villains have reasons to sympathize with them.

    The writing might not be as flawless as Game of Thrones, but I found it to be just as
    No, it might not be Netflix's Game of Thrones, but there's enough political and sexual intrigue in this well-casted show to make it worth a watch. I found every character compelling enough to be cared about regardless of their side in this war. Even the villains have reasons to sympathize with them.

    The writing might not be as flawless as Game of Thrones, but I found it to be just as gripping in it's own unique way. Occasionally the show will throw in some moments that just don't make all that much sense when you really begin to ponder them. Whether or not they actually played out that way in real life I cannot say, but overall this show's 10 episodes have intrigued me to take a look into it. Even if it isn't the show makes for a compelling take on the history.

    Yes, comparisons to Game of Thrones are being made by just about everyone, myself included. The reason for that that is the set up is similar. We as viewers are thrown into a world where many different characters are vying for power and are wiling to betray others and throw the world into chaos in order to get it. While it doesn't quite reach the heights the HBO masterpiece has it still gives plenty of reason to take it's world in. It's worth watching just for the gorgeous Asian setting/imagery and occasional kung fu action alone.
    Expand
  46. Jan 7, 2015
    10
    Great show. GOT fan here, although disappointed in last season. GOT has too many story lines, paying 5 seconds of attention to each per episode.

    Marco Polo was a pleasant surprise. Clever, edgy, HBO like production if not more - many times cinematic. The show shines a worthy light on Asian culture of long ago, albeit with entertaining artistic license. Well done Netflix. Can't
    Great show. GOT fan here, although disappointed in last season. GOT has too many story lines, paying 5 seconds of attention to each per episode.

    Marco Polo was a pleasant surprise. Clever, edgy, HBO like production if not more - many times cinematic. The show shines a worthy light on Asian culture of long ago, albeit with entertaining artistic license. Well done Netflix. Can't wait for season two. As for the professional critics, bashing this show. Looks like you missed your chance to bet on this horse. You folks are so brilliant aren't you? What a joke.
    Expand
  47. Jan 6, 2015
    10
    I want to start by saying that this is truly an amazing show. I started to watch Marco Polo because I've seen so many reviewers complaining about the treatment of women in it as well as other forms of discrimination. But this is not true at all. The show it gets better and better with each episode as the characters are developing and their story becomes more complex. I totally disagreeI want to start by saying that this is truly an amazing show. I started to watch Marco Polo because I've seen so many reviewers complaining about the treatment of women in it as well as other forms of discrimination. But this is not true at all. The show it gets better and better with each episode as the characters are developing and their story becomes more complex. I totally disagree with the the score given by the critics. Expand
  48. Jan 5, 2015
    10
    The show is far better than the critic reviews let out to believe. The historical reenactment of the Mongol conquering of China that is Marco Polo provides beautiful imagery for viewers as they follow the story of an Italian merchant. The show itself includes something for everyone: names and battles for history buffs to follow along with on Google; numerous intimate sex scenes for theThe show is far better than the critic reviews let out to believe. The historical reenactment of the Mongol conquering of China that is Marco Polo provides beautiful imagery for viewers as they follow the story of an Italian merchant. The show itself includes something for everyone: names and battles for history buffs to follow along with on Google; numerous intimate sex scenes for the ladies; and naked martial arts for the men. My review cannot fully convey the various reasons to give this show a chance despite poor reviews, so I suggest to anyone who is giving this show any thought that they start watching it as soon as possible. Expand
  49. Jan 4, 2015
    10
    Fantastic historic drama. Can't wait for season 2! Those who love drama with a historic background with a twist of martial arts and accurate (as can be) data, will love it also
  50. Jan 4, 2015
    10
    Why would anyone bother anymore to pay any attention to critic's reviews? What makes them any more trustworthy than a regular guy like me? Obviously nothing! The critics take this show and names it a cheap ripoff off Game of Thrones. Even the genres are different. I sincerely hope I need not explain this to anyone.

    The series is very pleasantly paced and uses history as a guideline.
    Why would anyone bother anymore to pay any attention to critic's reviews? What makes them any more trustworthy than a regular guy like me? Obviously nothing! The critics take this show and names it a cheap ripoff off Game of Thrones. Even the genres are different. I sincerely hope I need not explain this to anyone.

    The series is very pleasantly paced and uses history as a guideline. Nowhere does it try to do otherwise.
    It does however take historical information, like the role of the Wong dinasty, the fall of the great wall and the role of a trebuchet-like contraption in it. It however gives it a spin and enlarges the role of the main character in this.
    It is pure historical fiction and should be well enjoyed like this.

    A fan.
    Expand
  51. Jan 3, 2015
    9
    The show is great, the first episode is so-so but it gets better later on. Personally I dont agree with the critics like most user reviews. The show offers some great combat and romance scenes. However some times the plot gets a bit dull. In general this show is pretty decent.
  52. Jan 2, 2015
    9
    I don't know why critics have panned this show. My wife and I enjoyed watching all 10 episodes of the first season. Contrary to what the critics said, we did not fall asleep to any of the episodes, in fact we had a hard time not binge watching the entire series in one night. The production value was phenomenal, the story telling was great, and the acting superb. Listen to the users,I don't know why critics have panned this show. My wife and I enjoyed watching all 10 episodes of the first season. Contrary to what the critics said, we did not fall asleep to any of the episodes, in fact we had a hard time not binge watching the entire series in one night. The production value was phenomenal, the story telling was great, and the acting superb. Listen to the users, because clearly the critics are drunk. Expand
  53. Jan 2, 2015
    10
    I created an account just to review this show. First off, the official reviews just highlight both the divide between critics and their audiences as well as their bias concerning non-Western focused media. Second, everything said, both positive and negative, are all true to a certain extent but the hyperbole doesn't begin to cover the subtlety and complexity of this story. The critics alsoI created an account just to review this show. First off, the official reviews just highlight both the divide between critics and their audiences as well as their bias concerning non-Western focused media. Second, everything said, both positive and negative, are all true to a certain extent but the hyperbole doesn't begin to cover the subtlety and complexity of this story. The critics also grossly oversimplify the pro and cons as well leave out one of the most important aspects of this show: pacing. You'll find yourself forgiving the occasionally dry, melodramatic battle speech because of one tiny flicker of a character's eyelids that teases that the traitor will finally be revealed. This show is that well-planned out: even the scenes where the acting feels ham-fisted and the nudity and blood seem like the distractions of filler are easily forgiven even by the impatient because of the promise of new developments and long-awaited conclusions. And that comes from someone who can never successfully binge-watch of filler and impatience. Yes, this type of medieval drama is covered by Game of Thrones, but not with these kind of REAL WORLD examples. Yes, there often seems an abundance of fighting and sex scenes, but they never feel pointless. Yes, sometimes some actors give you a scene that feels over the top and wooden, but then will make it up for with another that feels like a real human display of emotion and the opposite is true of even the best characters in the series. Yes, the dialogue, action and intrigue appeal to many different genres at once, but never in a way that feels incomplete. Despite its title, Marco Polo is less about the man and more about his transformation from a God-fearing European into a servant of the Khan, as well as his role as an agent of change in a empire that is hinted may be fast reaching its zenith. Marco Polo is about the ultimately morally grey process of civilization and nation-building, likely without even intending to be. A character may be cast as strong as iron and brimming with confidence, only to be observed as they break from their failures and wallow in their flaws. While the "villains" may occasionally display more of the latter, they are never made out to be evil and are often driven by these flaws towards quite sympathetic goals. For their part, the "heroes" often attain victories that quickly feel hollow and temporary, and you'll find yourself sympathizing with Kublai as it all threatens to fall apart - until he callously starts ordering executions and mutilations, then goes and shows what a loving husband and father he is as well as a loyal friend, before moving onto the killing again and repeating the cycle. Simply put, Marco Polo is not for those who constantly need things to be put simply, and it's geared more for those who like analyzing a story as well as reading about the background outside of the episode run-time. Expand
  54. Jan 2, 2015
    10
    Marco Polo is a great show. It really makes it clear that for Netflix shows have a future. Me and my friend could not stop watching. The characters were awesome and it doesn't take long before you start picking favorites. I can't wait to start my encore next week.
  55. Jan 2, 2015
    10
    one of the finest series i ever seen, it takes an excelent production into a 10 movie like series about one of my favorites history characters, i just hope, and i really really hope that negative opinions of some ppl that has the sense of taste for good series in the bottom of theyr chairs dont make this serie to find a cancel... im just tired that americans doesnt really know how toone of the finest series i ever seen, it takes an excelent production into a 10 movie like series about one of my favorites history characters, i just hope, and i really really hope that negative opinions of some ppl that has the sense of taste for good series in the bottom of theyr chairs dont make this serie to find a cancel... im just tired that americans doesnt really know how to apreciate series, and like only the soap box like crappy history some favorites has. Expand
  56. Jan 2, 2015
    9
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Great show! The critics are wrong about this one. Just look at the user reviews on Rotten Tomatoes and this site. The people love this show.

    The set design and costumes are impeccable. Just watch this show and look at the costumes, the city, the beautiful wood carvings, etc. Then go back and compare it to Game of Thrones season 1. It makes Game of Thrones look fake!

    You can tell that the writers did their history research. I know a good amount about the history of the Mongols and I appreciate how they include little extra history tidbits through dialogue. This show does embellish a lot though, to keep things interesting and appeal to the audience. I really wish they didn't have every asian know magically know kung fu.

    I also wish they had more full fledged battles instead of just skipping them through cuts. Come on, 90 million bucks and you can't show a full-on, messy battle? What a great opportunity to highlight the world conquering Mongol war tactics. No problem. It's only season 1, hopefully they'll include more next season.

    Spoilers:
    They really embellished a lot in the last few episodes and did a disservice to the Persian engineers. By this time, Trebuchets were already used Middle East for a long time, but they let Marco be the magical inventor?
    Expand
  57. Jan 2, 2015
    4
    King Henry the eighth I am I am.......

    Problem is the model is entirely wrong, Western, inaccurate to certain extent. After hearing of this New Series, I was too happy to be revisiting childhood memories of that amazing previous TV series Marco Polo. Upon suffering this opening prologue to then be transported back to Venice, I turned off. Although I was told it gets better. Not at all.
    King Henry the eighth I am I am.......

    Problem is the model is entirely wrong, Western, inaccurate to certain extent. After hearing of this New Series, I was too happy to be revisiting childhood memories of that amazing previous TV series Marco Polo. Upon suffering this opening prologue to then be transported back to Venice, I turned off. Although I was told it gets better. Not at all. Surely, there are many plots within plots. To be taken with a pinch of salt when flinching mostly at what has been displayed

    Castings, and structure, have been made for mass appeal. Rather then totally fitting into the realms of historic, or indeed accurately correct. This series seemingly gleaning from the GOT genre the ogling of excessive mass nudity, happening almost every 5 minutes. Rather then the finer art of sets and location.

    Disappointed with this attempted. Surely it has a market for rewriting history into some kind of new world order, or whatever wants to be achieved from this. I have absolutely no idea at all?
    Expand
  58. Jan 1, 2015
    10
    After reading the "critic" reviews I was left questioning if I really wanted to start watching this show... Turns out, as usual, they are completely wrong. I loved all 10 episodes. People who like history will enjoy the context of the show - despite the liberties the writers take. I found it very similar to "The Vikings" in that regard. People who love action and suspense will enjoyAfter reading the "critic" reviews I was left questioning if I really wanted to start watching this show... Turns out, as usual, they are completely wrong. I loved all 10 episodes. People who like history will enjoy the context of the show - despite the liberties the writers take. I found it very similar to "The Vikings" in that regard. People who love action and suspense will enjoy this as well - a mix between braveheart and kung fu movies. People who like drama will enjoy the geopolitical story lines that emerge more strongly as the season progresses.

    In short, I can't wait for the next set of episodes. Don't listen to the "critics."
    Expand
  59. Jan 1, 2015
    7
    Why did critics pan this show? The writing and acting may not be as good as Games of Thrones but are way above average. Cinematography and production design are exceptional. A great historical show with a slow plot targeted at mature audiences. Let's hope Netflix renews for a second season.
  60. Dec 30, 2014
    10
    I'm here just to give the show the rating it deserves.The main reason I believe the show was a hit is because the show is not predictable and follows a new format of story telling in a new setting.
  61. Dec 30, 2014
    10
    Really enjoyed this series. As far as the critics.... I give them a 2. I can't understand what their issue is/was , everyone I have spoken to has enjoyed this show. I guess when your paycheck depends on you being a dissatisfied dolt...you try to be the sourest dolt you can.
  62. Dec 30, 2014
    10
    Excellent series and well worth watching. A tiny bit slow at times but they are trying to develop the characters. All the characters are deep, well thought out and well played. You really get into each episode and character.

    There is nudity and some sexual situations but it is much tamer than Game of Thrones.
  63. Dec 30, 2014
    10
    I really don't understand the so called professional critics negative reviews.

    Marco Polo was awesome with epic battle scenes and fantastic fights and intrigue, i was hooked from the word go and desperately want a second season. Someone please remind me not to watch the rubbish these so called experts recommend as no doubt it will be garbage if we are that far apart on opinion.
    I really don't understand the so called professional critics negative reviews.

    Marco Polo was awesome with epic battle scenes and fantastic fights and intrigue, i was hooked from the word go and desperately want a second season.

    Someone please remind me not to watch the rubbish these so called experts recommend as no doubt it will be garbage if we are that far apart on opinion.

    Ignore the critics and prepare for a exciting ride !
    Expand
  64. Dec 29, 2014
    9
    Many so-called professional critics are nothing but self-absorbed, egocentric, narcissistic snobs who take perverse pleasure in reading their own reviews as if they were some intellectual achievement worth noting. The bottom line is that this series has an interesting plot loosely structured around a people and culture that Americans no little about; excellent acting; great costumes;Many so-called professional critics are nothing but self-absorbed, egocentric, narcissistic snobs who take perverse pleasure in reading their own reviews as if they were some intellectual achievement worth noting. The bottom line is that this series has an interesting plot loosely structured around a people and culture that Americans no little about; excellent acting; great costumes; beautiful cinematography and sets; interesting armor and weaponry; with political intrigue, sex, and all the other components that make for a very watchable series. The vast majority of "user" reviews are positive and, in the end, the views of the watching public are far more meaningful and important that the views of a few so-called "critics." I encourage you to watch and judge for yourself. Expand
  65. Dec 29, 2014
    10
    Totally enjoyed this season of Marco Polo. Could not tear myself away. Excellent acting, beautiful sets and scenery. Intrigue and drama at its best! Looking forward to Season 2.
  66. Dec 29, 2014
    9
    I tend to agree with reviewers and critics, but almost all of these reviews are off by a wide margin. This is not a show to be compared with Game of Thrones. This is a show to be compared with The Tudors or Reign. This is an excellent show, that highlights and fantasizes the mystic east, without the idealization and romance found in other lesser historical dramas.

    This is not an epic
    I tend to agree with reviewers and critics, but almost all of these reviews are off by a wide margin. This is not a show to be compared with Game of Thrones. This is a show to be compared with The Tudors or Reign. This is an excellent show, that highlights and fantasizes the mystic east, without the idealization and romance found in other lesser historical dramas.

    This is not an epic fantasy and thus can not hope to provide the type of sweeping epic drama of that genre. This is a romp through time and history into a familiar landscape of our earth in a legendary age. No show before it has tried to conquer such breadth of vision, nor has come close to such an expansive empire. Each episode is a whirlwind of action and drama and character that few shows of the historical fiction genre can compete.

    I am both disturbed and bewildered by the negative reviews. This show is so great, and so unparalleled that not only did I make an account to write this review, but I felt a wave of deep sadness that these so called critics could be so wrong!
    Expand
  67. Dec 29, 2014
    9
    The first episode was rather crummy and the first few episodes had quite a few gratuitous sex scenes that had my eyes practically rolling out of my head, but boy did it get better. Excellent acting all around, beautiful music, expertly crafted combat scenes. I truly hope additional seasons are procured and the executives ignore the pompous "professional critics"
  68. Dec 29, 2014
    10
    This is an other case where you will find a huge disparity between the viewers score and the "professionals" score. Do you know which opinion count at the end of the day? Us the viewers. This is a fun show, with great production value. The attention to details is more than i have expected for a first production of this sort for Netflix. Some of the plot maybe predictable at times, but itThis is an other case where you will find a huge disparity between the viewers score and the "professionals" score. Do you know which opinion count at the end of the day? Us the viewers. This is a fun show, with great production value. The attention to details is more than i have expected for a first production of this sort for Netflix. Some of the plot maybe predictable at times, but it never was boring or uninteresting. Let's not forget that this is the first season where the show is still trying to find its tone. I have started watching this show with my wife yesterday and already we are at episode 8. Give it a try you will not be disappointed. Just keep in mind that this is by no measure any competitor for GOT nor it is trying to be and you will be just fine. Expand
  69. Dec 28, 2014
    10
    This show is just another example of how mainstream reviewers are completely out of touch with the public. Quite simply, Marco Polo is an amazing show. It kept me interested from episode 1 all the way to episode 10, by which time I was extremely interested in the show. I cannot speak about the historical accuracy of the show, since I know little about this time period; however, I thinkThis show is just another example of how mainstream reviewers are completely out of touch with the public. Quite simply, Marco Polo is an amazing show. It kept me interested from episode 1 all the way to episode 10, by which time I was extremely interested in the show. I cannot speak about the historical accuracy of the show, since I know little about this time period; however, I think anything involving Marco Polo is fairly controversial, since scholars do not even agree on whether or not he even existed. Still, I found it extremely entertaining, while at the same time informative. I would recommend this show to anyone who enjoys movies with a historical setting. Season 2 cannot come quickly enough! Expand
  70. Dec 28, 2014
    10
    The critics can shove it where the sun don't shine! This is an awesome series and I hope Netflix continues this epic!!!! I watched it all in 3 days and I am waiting too see what happens next!

    If you like awesomeness then this is for you. If you don't like awesomeness then move on to watch something else...
  71. Dec 28, 2014
    10
    I dont understand why critics are so harsh on their reviews of the show while so many users enjoyed it. Seems a bit fishy if you ask me. Ignore the negative reviews and give the show a shot atleast for a few episodes before you judge. Its an entertaining storyline and wonderfully produced show. Yes it might not be Game of Thrones, but what show can actually be compared to it these days?I dont understand why critics are so harsh on their reviews of the show while so many users enjoyed it. Seems a bit fishy if you ask me. Ignore the negative reviews and give the show a shot atleast for a few episodes before you judge. Its an entertaining storyline and wonderfully produced show. Yes it might not be Game of Thrones, but what show can actually be compared to it these days? GOT already had several million followers from the book which helped its success. Its seem some folks have an issue with the actors speaking english but then again those are the same people who would complain if they had to read subtitles too. If you need a new show to watch, watch this. Not the other lame crap on cable TV. Expand
  72. Dec 28, 2014
    10
    Just registered an account here because I really don't understand the bad reviews this show is getting from critics. Good to see most users are positive, I share that sentiment. Just finished the first season and can't wait until the next. Really beautiful show, full of story, great characters and a refreshing calm pace. It reminds me a bit of other Asian movies I've seen and maybe it'sJust registered an account here because I really don't understand the bad reviews this show is getting from critics. Good to see most users are positive, I share that sentiment. Just finished the first season and can't wait until the next. Really beautiful show, full of story, great characters and a refreshing calm pace. It reminds me a bit of other Asian movies I've seen and maybe it's this different style that confuses 'professional' critics. Really enjoyed this insight into a world I know next to nothing about with some truly amazing beautiful pictures. Expand
  73. Dec 28, 2014
    10
    This is my 1st review. Why was I compelled to go to the trouble of reviewing Marco Polo? Like many other user reviews, to help correct the injustice that was the critic reviews.

    Cinematography amazing, actors were fantastic, elements of history related to the time and region made it all the more interesting. Action scenes, especially in season finale, were great. Bottom line: it
    This is my 1st review. Why was I compelled to go to the trouble of reviewing Marco Polo? Like many other user reviews, to help correct the injustice that was the critic reviews.

    Cinematography amazing, actors were fantastic, elements of history related to the time and region made it all the more interesting. Action scenes, especially in season finale, were great.

    Bottom line: it was engaging. For about 50% of the TV series I try, I lose interest at about the 2nd episode and stop watching. Not the case with Marco Polo. I watched all 10 episodes in a week. Critics felt the story line was weak. I evidently disagree.
    Expand
  74. Dec 28, 2014
    10
    Shocked to say this Show had me hooked by episode 2, The plot seems to get more and more interesting and they make use of their characters. If you liked shows Like Rome but with more action then this could easily be your next show to watch. The fighting in here helps the Drama side of things imo.
  75. Dec 27, 2014
    5
    Cinematography: Gorgeous. Acting: Meh for the Anglos, Not bad for the orientals. Chin Han and Benedict Wong are great, Joan Chen is very very good. Visually stunning in parts, the dialog sounds as if it were written by someone who's only exposure to Chinese is dubbed English from 1970s Kung-Fu movies. It's really horrible. Turn on subtitles to really SEE how bad it is. The series bogsCinematography: Gorgeous. Acting: Meh for the Anglos, Not bad for the orientals. Chin Han and Benedict Wong are great, Joan Chen is very very good. Visually stunning in parts, the dialog sounds as if it were written by someone who's only exposure to Chinese is dubbed English from 1970s Kung-Fu movies. It's really horrible. Turn on subtitles to really SEE how bad it is. The series bogs down when Polo is on screen, but the other characters carry it as best they can. Too many incorrect geographic and cultural references, I can not believe the show creator spent years researching Mongolian history. From what, a Catholic Church guide to the Devils Army? Expand
  76. Dec 27, 2014
    9
    Let me tell you something about Marco Polo; it is a great show, it might have some historical inaccuracies, but you're meant to watch an entertaining show, not a history lesson.. I rather enjoy a wonderful show with some inaccuracies than make it extremely boring. Okay, might not be the most wonderful thing in earth to have fake stuff in it, but if you're watching it to pass your easternLet me tell you something about Marco Polo; it is a great show, it might have some historical inaccuracies, but you're meant to watch an entertaining show, not a history lesson.. I rather enjoy a wonderful show with some inaccuracies than make it extremely boring. Okay, might not be the most wonderful thing in earth to have fake stuff in it, but if you're watching it to pass your eastern history final, the joke is on you.
    I've grown to love diverse casts, and this one is so unique, rare and different from what I'm used to it that I find it appealing and lovely.
    The visuals are gorgeous, that trapped me instantly. Feminine characters are amazing, colors are gorgeous as well as the music.
    I just truly hope we get more seasons, because I'm recommending this to everyone I know.
    Expand
  77. Dec 26, 2014
    10
    It started off slow, but once it gets going the pay off is well worth it. The landscapes and scenery are absolutely amazing, I've been to that part of the world and its even better in person. the acting is good and gets better as the story unravels but the storytelling and character development of the writing is on par with House of Cards. No clue what the "critics" are comparing it toIt started off slow, but once it gets going the pay off is well worth it. The landscapes and scenery are absolutely amazing, I've been to that part of the world and its even better in person. the acting is good and gets better as the story unravels but the storytelling and character development of the writing is on par with House of Cards. No clue what the "critics" are comparing it to to give it such low scores. I started slow with the first three episodes, then it got really good and i binge watched the rest in one day. The plot twist at the end of the season is well worth a watch. Expand
  78. Dec 26, 2014
    10
    Critics are a bunch of nobodies. Noone really pays attention to them! Marco Polo is a really superbly crafted show and I really hope for a 2nd season. Tha battles and combat training scenes were great and the acting was pretty good. Not to mention the stunning sceneries and structures!!!
  79. Dec 26, 2014
    10
    Truly amazing show and brilliant from beginning to end, one has to wonder if the critics were watching the same show or if there opinion really matters any more?

    As the people have spoken on this!
  80. Dec 26, 2014
    10
    Not for the first time, the critics have gotten it wrong. I started it this morning, am on the final episode, and I am hopeful that it won't be the last.
    It does start out slow, and a little waffley, however it picks up steam. I don't know what else to say other than I really enjoyed the show, and I think you will too..
  81. Dec 26, 2014
    10
    Excellent tv series cleaver intricate woven plot portraying different cultures and their interactions brilliantly with insight and intriuge. A great series if you have a brain for cleaver plots and dynamic. Highly recommended, not for stick in the muds or stupid people :p
  82. Dec 26, 2014
    10
    A great tv show. I was hooked since I started watching it and finished in a week. A Great cast from top to bottom. I think the critics are very wrong!
  83. Dec 26, 2014
    10
    Boy, do the critics have this wrong.
    They say Marco Polo didn't invent the catapult. This wasn't Netflix's problem, it was Polo's. He wasn't any historian, and enhanced his own story.
    That said, the series is pretty much based on history. Game of Thrones is fantasy. The series goes deep into Chinese culture and history - a lot is not obvious. There is great character development,
    Boy, do the critics have this wrong.
    They say Marco Polo didn't invent the catapult. This wasn't Netflix's problem, it was Polo's. He wasn't any historian, and enhanced his own story.
    That said, the series is pretty much based on history. Game of Thrones is fantasy.
    The series goes deep into Chinese culture and history - a lot is not obvious.
    There is great character development, especially of the woman characters - beyond the soft core porn parts, which I am glad there almost none of in the second half.
    The second half of the series is superior to the first.
    Too bad the critics never saw the series to the end.
    Expand
  84. Dec 25, 2014
    10
    Outstanding, great show. I only signed up to metacritic after seeing critics off-the-mark reviews. If you like classic kung fu flicks, you are in for an especially good treat on two superb fight scenes. The second fight scene had me jumping up and rooting for the great action - truly a call-out out to the greatest kung fu scenes. The personalities of the characters and their relationshipsOutstanding, great show. I only signed up to metacritic after seeing critics off-the-mark reviews. If you like classic kung fu flicks, you are in for an especially good treat on two superb fight scenes. The second fight scene had me jumping up and rooting for the great action - truly a call-out out to the greatest kung fu scenes. The personalities of the characters and their relationships are explored and challenged. The Khan himself is developed into a complex character in a complex world. The dialogue is really good, nothing like what I read from the critics. I truly appreciate this show. My hat goes off to the producers. The colors and cinematography are nothing short of gorgeous and the set design is epic. The plots of the players drive the story at every turn. This is the show to watch. Enjoy. Expand
  85. Dec 25, 2014
    8
    Numerous critics have panned this show calling it inferior to Game of Thrones. No, it isn't Game of Thrones, but that is an unfair standard to which to hold it. It is, however, very watchable and better than 90% of the crud on TV. The cinematography is spectacular and some of the best I have ever seen for a made for TV production and the story line is interesting. If I were to criticizeNumerous critics have panned this show calling it inferior to Game of Thrones. No, it isn't Game of Thrones, but that is an unfair standard to which to hold it. It is, however, very watchable and better than 90% of the crud on TV. The cinematography is spectacular and some of the best I have ever seen for a made for TV production and the story line is interesting. If I were to criticize any aspect, it would be the hokey martial arts scenes. At times I feel like I'm watching a Bruce Lee movie. Expand
  86. Dec 24, 2014
    10
    I also registered here to defend the show. I never quite understood what qualifies one to be a professional critic. That being said, I think people can judge for themselves, AFTER watching a couple of episodes. I for one enjoyed the first season, very much. The character, Marco Polo was already the only white person among Asians, he did not need to over-dramatize his role since he stoodI also registered here to defend the show. I never quite understood what qualifies one to be a professional critic. That being said, I think people can judge for themselves, AFTER watching a couple of episodes. I for one enjoyed the first season, very much. The character, Marco Polo was already the only white person among Asians, he did not need to over-dramatize his role since he stood out anyway. It's also nice to see that although the story is about him, it can only be in context of the larger-than-life characters. The show has layers of complexities, and I like that it is not very predictable. While the critics claims that Marco Polo is a boring character, I think that they missed they entire point. He is an outsider! The Khan is ruthless, and he is far from foolish. Kublai has a huge ego as is expected, and people with such big egos tend to behave very foolishly. The story is about power struggles which Marco isn't much a part of. He is an outsider, and he behaves as such. He is humble and does not believe himself to be above anyone, as is not typically the case when the white westerner gets involved.

    As to the role of women and nudity - as a woman myself, all I can say is "what else is new"? I enjoyed the show, very much and I would recommend it.
    Expand
  87. Dec 24, 2014
    10
    i made an account to defend this show. I dont understand the critics reviews. great show, great acting, very entertaining. if you like game of thrones you will enjoy this show.
  88. Dec 24, 2014
    10
    This show absolutely blowed me away. I wasn't expecting much as I had read some scathing "critic" reviews but I immediately found out how mistaken they were. This show has the ability to transport you to this ancient time and culture bearing witness to the adventures of Marco and the Khan. It is like a modern day Shakespeare with several plots and subplots all building together andThis show absolutely blowed me away. I wasn't expecting much as I had read some scathing "critic" reviews but I immediately found out how mistaken they were. This show has the ability to transport you to this ancient time and culture bearing witness to the adventures of Marco and the Khan. It is like a modern day Shakespeare with several plots and subplots all building together and clashing. It's beautiful, captivating, touching, and most of all entertaining. I have been glued to this all season and I hope there will be a second. Expand
  89. Dec 24, 2014
    9
    The pilot seemed a little rushed, and I was lost at first... It kind of through me off then I watched the second episode and couldn't stop watching it. I think the show is great and dose a good job filling in my GoT void....cant wait for Season 2
  90. Dec 24, 2014
    3
    Just boring. Always fell asleep while watching. Beautiful pictures but not story, no drama, no nothing.
    I am big fan of recent hbo and netflix tv series but this one is a waste of lots of money...too bad.
  91. Dec 24, 2014
    10
    Do not be deceived by pessimistic critics reviews, they have soiled themselves and lost the passion of adventure. The sort that cannot enjoy and immensely artful creative fiction. I am enthralled by the costume design, the beautiful cinematography, fantastic score and the alluring concepts of Asian culture woven into a sexy and exciting rendition of the fall of the Song Dynasty. If youDo not be deceived by pessimistic critics reviews, they have soiled themselves and lost the passion of adventure. The sort that cannot enjoy and immensely artful creative fiction. I am enthralled by the costume design, the beautiful cinematography, fantastic score and the alluring concepts of Asian culture woven into a sexy and exciting rendition of the fall of the Song Dynasty. If you like Game of Thrones you will certainly love Marco Polo. Although the feminists viewers will be offended I do fancy some of the more passionate scenes involved. I registered on Meta Critics just for this show, and it is the first thing that has brought a smile to my face in over a week. As the season progresses the articulation does so as well and I found myself clapping at the finale with joy. They are some very unique aspects to this show but most of all I truly loved the immersion of the cultures and the historical period of the mid to late 1200;s as there are no other shows that have such an imaginative take on the Silk Road period. The acting was solid and although at times it lacked action it more than makes up for it in the end.

    Overall I will be a zealous supporter of this show. It literally took me aback at times, had me leaning in at others yet most of all had me frequenting cigarette breaks due to the collective experience. Very well done thank you so much for this show Netflix.

    Ben Fatto.
    Expand
  92. Dec 23, 2014
    9
    This show is much better than the critics state. Full of action, political intrigue and historical facts, it is fun to watch. Binge worthy. Comparing it to Game of Thrones is ridiculous. That is Fantasy while this is historical fiction.
  93. Dec 23, 2014
    10
    An epic adventure/intrigue tale, beautifully rich in scenic and poetic detail that pulls you in and has a hold on you by the end of the first episode. Anything but plodding, its pace is deliberate, teasing, building in intensity like slow and powerful sex, complete with the titillation of bare skin. The release comes in the form of quick bursts of violent action, long enough to satisfy butAn epic adventure/intrigue tale, beautifully rich in scenic and poetic detail that pulls you in and has a hold on you by the end of the first episode. Anything but plodding, its pace is deliberate, teasing, building in intensity like slow and powerful sex, complete with the titillation of bare skin. The release comes in the form of quick bursts of violent action, long enough to satisfy but leaving you wanting more. Put the kids to bed and turn the lights off, pay attention and absorb the story and your patience will certainly be rewarded. Expand
  94. Dec 23, 2014
    8
    I binge watched the whole first season tonight, so I'm about 10x more suited to give a review on this show compared to the "professional" critics who only watched the pilot, which yeah, was kind of a boring stage-setting episode.

    Once it gets going though the courtly intrigue, scheming, and martial arts are pretty great. In my opinion the only real downsides are some really obvious last
    I binge watched the whole first season tonight, so I'm about 10x more suited to give a review on this show compared to the "professional" critics who only watched the pilot, which yeah, was kind of a boring stage-setting episode.

    Once it gets going though the courtly intrigue, scheming, and martial arts are pretty great. In my opinion the only real downsides are some really obvious last gen CG effects, and Marco being written a little too "I'm the hero"-ey.

    It's worth giving it a few episodes to see if you like it.
    Expand
  95. Dec 22, 2014
    10
    Watched the entire 10 episodes in two nights...Could not stop watching...Loved it! I read some comments saying it was not accurate to historical facts...Yes, that might be the case and to them I suggest to watch the History Channel...I hope there is a season 2...
  96. Dec 22, 2014
    9
    I am appalled by all the horrible reviews from the critics. As an Asian American woman who also loved Game of Thrones, I have to disagree with them. I am comforted that the user ratings serve the series justice.

    I started the show knowing nothing about it – I was unaware of what the critics have said thus far and watched it with an open mind. I loved it. The show was extremely
    I am appalled by all the horrible reviews from the critics. As an Asian American woman who also loved Game of Thrones, I have to disagree with them. I am comforted that the user ratings serve the series justice.

    I started the show knowing nothing about it – I was unaware of what the critics have said thus far and watched it with an open mind. I loved it. The show was extremely captivating. I binge watched 4 episodes and wanted more but it was already 1am.

    I can’t help but think that the low reviews from critics are paid-off or just extremely biased. Either way, I urge everyone to just watch it for yourselves regardless of the reviews (both user and critics).

    I do not watch this show for historical accuracy. If I wanted that, I would watch a documentary… and critique it. I expect the shows I watch to entertain me, and this Marco Polo did. I can see how some people would find this series boring at first – like GoT, you are introduced to a lot of characters at first and some very complicated geopolitical warfare that guides the plot. What I look for most in a show is character development through conflict, I think this show does this well. I do have to agree, Marco Polo is not my favorite character and at times he is even forgotten. Kublai Khan’s character is extraordinary and shows a lot of depth. All characters in this show are driven by an underlying motive – some are not fully developed yet (I am only on episode 4), but I am eager to find out how they will continue to choose their own paths.

    As an Asian American, I would like to address the “oriental stereotypes” that critics keep calling to. I am typically very sensitive to these subjects and are wary of them when I watch Asian actors in western films. I did not have any issues with this during my viewing of Marco Polo (other than that they all speak with an accent, but then again so does Marco Polo because he is from Italy). I don’t doubt that kung fu and objectifying women were realities back in 12th century. For those to exist in this film makes sense to me. I feel that the creator is using these mediums to paint a true picture of what society was like in that time period. I say this because I have watched many Chinese movies in my lifetime (in Chinese), and the same themes exist there as well. Crouching Tigger Hidden Dragon was solely based on these concepts, yet it won many Academy Awards. Game of Thrones was fully explicit with their nudity, I didn’t see anyone complaining about objectifying women there (although, that is valid). Also, I do not think Marco Polo did any of this in a distasteful manner, I did not feel offended.

    In fact, I applaud the creators for casting such a diverse cast. This movie creates a new level of exposure to amazing acting done by Asian actors and other actors of color as well. These are actors from all over the world with different backgrounds and experiences, much like Khan’s empire. Finally, in 2014 do we have a diverse cast, if only this can be carried into films that are set in the modern day as well.

    If there were Chinese subtitles, I would recommend this to my parents as well.

    I hope for the best for this series. It would be discouraging and unjust for it to fail based on these critics reviews, I encourage everyone to watch for yourselves.
    Expand
  97. Dec 22, 2014
    9
    Fewer orgies and I would have given the show a 10. I like the story, actors, cinematography, music...everything! A welcome surprise. Nice to see some interesting female characters as well on TV. Highly recommend to those that like a plot but can also suspend their disbelief at Marco Polo being a Kung Fu master.
  98. Dec 22, 2014
    10
    I don't typically write reviews, I tend to vote with my wallet, but in this case of this show I felt I had to do something because of all the negative critical reviews. This show is fantastic, I don't want to spoil anything for anyone, or even hype it up too much, all I will say is if you watch it, you will enjoy it. This show is perfectly crafted. I'm thinking about writing a thank youI don't typically write reviews, I tend to vote with my wallet, but in this case of this show I felt I had to do something because of all the negative critical reviews. This show is fantastic, I don't want to spoil anything for anyone, or even hype it up too much, all I will say is if you watch it, you will enjoy it. This show is perfectly crafted. I'm thinking about writing a thank you note to Netflix and the Weinstein Company, and everyone else responsible for making this show possible. Expand
  99. Dec 22, 2014
    10
    The show is amazing.
    I do not know whether it's 100% historically accurate, but everything seems very plausible, from the structures, to the costumes, to the songs and speeches. The absence of magical elements and stuff helps the credibility too; just in one occasion some weird stuff was going on, but because there were drugs into play. In any case, the show allowed me to know more about
    The show is amazing.
    I do not know whether it's 100% historically accurate, but everything seems very plausible, from the structures, to the costumes, to the songs and speeches. The absence of magical elements and stuff helps the credibility too; just in one occasion some weird stuff was going on, but because there were drugs into play. In any case, the show allowed me to know more about some historical events that I had not the chance to learn in school, and this is definitely a plus.
    I do not share the faults found by some critic reviews say. I found the quality of the image always clear, in dark scenes too. The story is compelling and you always want to get back to see what's next.
    The characters are well-rounded, and both sides (Mongols and Chinese) have both positive and negative aspects. However, I have to say that the Chinese minister is perhaps too evilly characterised, so you naturally come to wish for his defeat.
    Particular mentions deserves Lorenzo Richelmy (Marco Polo): I found his acting particularly good, his speeches crystal clear and he himself charming. I was surprised to find out he's actually Italian, as I usually do not like Italian actors (I am Italian too, so I see many of them).
    There is but one thing I did not like, and it's the very last scene: that painting is way too explicit, and I seriously doubt someone with those ambitions and that political ability would keep such a painting in plain sight.
    Conclusion: can't wait for season 2!
    Expand
  100. Dec 21, 2014
    9
    I, too, had to create a profile just to defend this show. The critics seem to have written it off without giving it fair chance. Certainly, Marco is not the charismatic hero we might expect from a titular character, but I believe that is the point. His journey is becoming a better man by observing the actions of more dynamic, more interesting characters than himself.I think it's wise ofI, too, had to create a profile just to defend this show. The critics seem to have written it off without giving it fair chance. Certainly, Marco is not the charismatic hero we might expect from a titular character, but I believe that is the point. His journey is becoming a better man by observing the actions of more dynamic, more interesting characters than himself.I think it's wise of the showrunners to play him as intelligent but tragically naive. One might even consider that the attitude towards enlightenment Western thinking that show is taking. Kublai is one of the most interesting characters on TV. And I for one am really excited to see a show with this kind of budget with only one white dude in its troupe. As for the GoTcomparisons..both shows are palace dramas. Their similarities are the ones they share with every other show, movie, novel, etc.in their genre. Expand
Metascore
48

Mixed or average reviews - based on 21 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 21
  2. Negative: 7 out of 21
  1. 30
    The show is vacant and uninspiring, so much so that I'd rather fill my imaginary home with ball utensils than watch Marco Polo.
  2. Reviewed by: Tom Gliatto
    Dec 15, 2014
    70
    A fun, body-flinging, old-fashioned epic.... As Kublai Khan, British actor Benedict Wong gives an impressive performance, one of the best of the year: You absolutely believe his ruthlessness, his power and his calculating thoughtfulness. As Marco Polo, on the other hand, Italian actor Lorenzo Richelmy, who looks like a more lyrical Emile Hirsch, mostly has to be put up with.
  3. Reviewed by: Mekeisha Madden Toby
    Dec 15, 2014
    70
    Ultimately, once viewers overcome the sluggish pace there’s something for everyone with Marco Polo. History lovers will enjoy Googling along with the series as historical names and battles are introduced while martial arts fans will appreciate the intricately choreographed fight scenes. Although the series isn’t as riveting as “Game of Thrones,” strong performances and impeccable visuals make it worthy of a watch on a slow and rainy afternoon.