Marco Polo (2014)

:

Season 1
  • Network: Netflix
  • Series Premiere Date: Dec 12, 2014
Season #: 2, 1
User Score
8.0

Generally favorable reviews- based on 499 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 411 out of 499
  2. Mixed: 31 out of 499
  3. Negative: 57 out of 499
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Stream On
Stream On

Review this tv show

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

User Reviews

view
per page
  1. Abyssus
    Dec 21, 2014
    9
    It is weird that this show got so many low reviews by hands of 'professional' critics. I think it is rather pleasant show. Of course, it can't be like GoT because HBO is not behind then. This is well written enjoyable show. Well done Netflix.
  2. dawin45
    Dec 21, 2014
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This is the Asian Game of Thrones, or Netflix Game of Thrones by my point of view although they are not historically accurate, in some points;

    As I read some reviews from the top critics they only judged the first 1-2 episodes,and they thought Marco Polo was the center of the action like in most series,but the tittle by my point of view only describes that the events are taking place in Marco Polos time frame.

    Also there are rumors on the internet of a $90 mil. budget ,this also seen in the series that it has a quite large cast and also a lot of stage men and stage props,really liked that they got some trebuchet and a big wall to simulate the walled city those where not made for free by my point of view...also the fight scenes are very real,didn't a lot of stunt men there...

    overal 10/10 because it is a first series financed by an internet tv broadcasting company as this is they're first project...    … Expand
  3. OldGitGuitar
    Dec 21, 2014
    10
    Great show, high quality drama. Great camera work, costumes and locations.
    Shows how far out of touch the professional critics are from the public.
    Most are sheep, most just like to be mean and probably get more readers with a negative page title.

    My brothers coming tonight I think I'll sacrifice a critic ...
  4. isale8792
    Dec 20, 2014
    10
    like really? I just made an account to tell how awesome is this serie! I am already dying to see what happens for season 2. PS: I want to congratulate the staff because the scenary, clothes even the actors look awesome -they really got it right while casting-
  5. Zimzams
    Dec 20, 2014
    9
    The historical setting got me hooked, and i stayed for the game of thrones esque intrigue, romance and plot surrounding the court of the (very well acted) Kublai Khan. While comparisons to what may very well be the greatest tv show ever made are inevitable, and make no mistake marco would not survive a day in King's landing, the show echoes GoT's greatness. It is not on the same level forThe historical setting got me hooked, and i stayed for the game of thrones esque intrigue, romance and plot surrounding the court of the (very well acted) Kublai Khan. While comparisons to what may very well be the greatest tv show ever made are inevitable, and make no mistake marco would not survive a day in King's landing, the show echoes GoT's greatness. It is not on the same level for sure, but it is by no means a failed attempt, where GoT is great, marco polo is good, and more than makes up for it with the excellent CGI battles and kong-fu action sequences. I feel we've been spoilt a little by the excellant standard of Martin's fantasy epic, and we (or perhaps critics) should be less quick to dismiss quality TV for simply not being as intellectually mind-blowing as game of thrones can be.… Expand
  6. Jambrose
    Dec 20, 2014
    10
    I thouroughly enjoyed this show. It definitley has it's low moments, but they pay-off is worth it 100%. I enjoyed it so much I'm currently watching it again with my room-mates. Don't buy intop the critic reviews, do your self a favor and watch the first three episodes before you make your decision
  7. Madelyn2Pedler
    Dec 20, 2014
    10
    Loved it! Past tense because I watched all episodes. I'm sad that there will not be more of them. It is better than most of the garbage on T.V.
    The characters are rich with depth and complexity of emotions and traits. Diversity of culture with Middle Eastern, Chinese, Mongolian, and Europians paired with setting, costumes, and music make this series RICH and enjoyable to watch.
  8. Aillas
    Dec 20, 2014
    4
    Looks very pretty but getting through it was a slog. Didn't care about any of the characters. The plot was plodding at best. A big disappointment, I've come to expect so much better of Netflix.
  9. jameshca
    Dec 20, 2014
    8
    Great cinematic, but too much of sex.

    Very different from what I expected. I was expecting a depiction of Mongol/Orient society during the reign of khanate (customs, politics, military cultures and etc. ), which the show delivered - the trebuchet is awesome, but the kung fu part is too hard to stomach. A Kung Fu Master Marco Polo? come on... Why critics gave the show such a low    Great cinematic, but too much of sex.

    Very different from what I expected.
    I was expecting a depiction of Mongol/Orient society during the reign of khanate (customs, politics, military cultures and etc. ), which the show delivered - the trebuchet is awesome, but the kung fu part is too hard to stomach. A Kung Fu Master Marco Polo? come on...

    Why critics gave the show such a low score? Are we going to have season 2?    … Expand
  10. snorlax634
    Dec 20, 2014
    9
    I thoroughly enjoyed this show. I do agree with other reviewers and feel it needed more action. But all in all to me it was enjoyable, beautiful scenery, and had some impressive performances. Don't pay attention to the "Critics". They were bought and paid for long ago. Pay attention to what the Users think. I highly recommend this show. You will not be disappointed.
  11. snackbob
    Dec 20, 2014
    4
    Starting with the positive, the landscapes and costumes are fantastic, however i feel this has been desecrated with (from the majority) bad acting, and lack of action. There for the most part are monotonous politics scenes, perfect for anyone wishing to commit suicide through boredom. In series such as GOT, this is only good because the high acting quality. I must say on another note theStarting with the positive, the landscapes and costumes are fantastic, however i feel this has been desecrated with (from the majority) bad acting, and lack of action. There for the most part are monotonous politics scenes, perfect for anyone wishing to commit suicide through boredom. In series such as GOT, this is only good because the high acting quality. I must say on another note the acting from "creepy praying mantas loving uncle" is fantastic in both action and political scenes. He i feel made it, not marco polo, not the khan, and especially not the khans son. There is also a well choreographed fight scene at the end, (blind man also a good actor). There is just a lack of sincerity with most scenes; a false quality which can be felt with bad acting. Conclusion, better actors, more action.This series could have taken a page from the 'house of flying daggers': a fantastic Asian inspired film.… Expand
  12. Ramses
    Dec 19, 2014
    9
    This is actually a much better show than the critic rating would indicate. It's very entertaining. It reminded me a lot of the movie Mongol, so if you enjoyed that movie you will probably enjoy this.
  13. Burnside88
    Dec 19, 2014
    8
    I cannot believe the negative reviews this is receiving from "critics". Some complain about the acting and others all of a sudden think themselves historians but most both. I do not claim to be a historian, and maybe that is why I take no issue with the creative liberty. The critics complain about how boring the show is in one sentence, and then bash it for having "too much kung fu andI cannot believe the negative reviews this is receiving from "critics". Some complain about the acting and others all of a sudden think themselves historians but most both. I do not claim to be a historian, and maybe that is why I take no issue with the creative liberty. The critics complain about how boring the show is in one sentence, and then bash it for having "too much kung fu and sex" in another. Meanwhile if it followed the true story of Marco Polo it would not be much of a show in any case.

    Is this show perfect? No. Is it worth watching? Hell yes. I am utterly disappointed in the "official" reception this show has gotten. Do yourselves a favour critics and let the people be the judge of Netflix's series. A user score of 8.3 is much more accurate than the 48 of so called professionals. You should stick to sitcom reviews and eat it while you're at it.    … Expand
  14. Archit3ct
    Dec 19, 2014
    9
    Love this show... forget the so called professional critic reviews.
    This show has fantastic visuals and a great cast in Wong, Yune and Joan Chen!
    Netflix has given us something different and refreshing! Season 2 please!
  15. YayaChronic
    Dec 19, 2014
    10
    I made an account just to review this because of the critics rating, this show was amazing. First two or three episodes maybe start off slow but that made it that much better, Marco is played wonderfully, the king, the chancellor everyone just perfect. it makes sens that it took 90 million to produce this amazing show
  16. nms1215
    Dec 19, 2014
    9
    It's a good show--it has something for everyone. It has sex, violence, martial arts, religion, culture, intrigue, war, growth, and great character dynamics that always provides a creative foil... Everything. It has a Taoist tone that reminds me of ithe Buddhist tone that made me fall in love with Avatar: The Last Airbender. I also really enjoy the acting and characters--from Kublai Khan,It's a good show--it has something for everyone. It has sex, violence, martial arts, religion, culture, intrigue, war, growth, and great character dynamics that always provides a creative foil... Everything. It has a Taoist tone that reminds me of ithe Buddhist tone that made me fall in love with Avatar: The Last Airbender. I also really enjoy the acting and characters--from Kublai Khan, Chancellor Jia Sidao, Marco Polo (and his relatives), the bind martial artist 'Hundred Eyes', etc. Though it can be weird when you sometimes pick out an attempt to cover an English accent, the acting is still good.

    The intrigue is interesting and makes political and military sense (not too many "*really?*" moments). The show is a bit gratuitous with the nudity at times, but they usually tie it well to character development or political scheming (which too few shows care to do nowadays). Simply give the show a chance. The critics do not do it justice (do they ever?)    … Expand
  17. aviterra
    Dec 19, 2014
    0
    I can't stay awake watching a plot that goes nowhere and horrible acting. I.These Mongols look like they came out of a B-movie. Not even slightly fearsome.
  18. Bearslayer
    Dec 19, 2014
    9
    The only thing the critics are right about it that the main character is NOT Marco Polo. This is a beautiful series. Supreme quality and I have told all my friends that it is a series they should watch.
  19. andifoster
    Dec 18, 2014
    9
    I can't remember the last time I really 'binge-watched' a show - but I found myself watching Marco Polo whenever I could and ended up being gutted when I finished it so quickly! Yes, the pilot is slow but I've seen much worse - but after that I found myself drawn in to the story and absolutely loved it. The acting isn't great at times (although again, I've seen much worse - Camelot fromI can't remember the last time I really 'binge-watched' a show - but I found myself watching Marco Polo whenever I could and ended up being gutted when I finished it so quickly! Yes, the pilot is slow but I've seen much worse - but after that I found myself drawn in to the story and absolutely loved it. The acting isn't great at times (although again, I've seen much worse - Camelot from Starz springs to mind) but the scope of the project, the twists and the characters just draw you in. I hope there is a 2nd season!!!… Expand
  20. Thumbsdown
    Dec 18, 2014
    10
    Great story, fabricated or semi inventive, can't stop watching. Has great Kung Fu, Sex, Bloody battles and lots of Drama. There are many historical facts to this which I truly enjoy, as a history buff. I like the Main character, he plays his role well as do the other actors.
  21. hydrologi
    Dec 18, 2014
    9
    I disagree with the critics, and I hope other viewers ignore them. The show is thoroughly enjoyable. Just don't expect a show focusing on Marco Polo's adventures. This is about Kublai Khan, his court, and his rivalry with Jia Sidao.

    Landscapes are breathtaking, fight scenes are spectacular (particularly season finale). Marco isn't a main character that you would expect from this genre    I disagree with the critics, and I hope other viewers ignore them. The show is thoroughly enjoyable. Just don't expect a show focusing on Marco Polo's adventures. This is about Kublai Khan, his court, and his rivalry with Jia Sidao.

    Landscapes are breathtaking, fight scenes are spectacular (particularly season finale). Marco isn't a main character that you would expect from this genre (e.g. Tyrion, Spartacus, etc). He is just along for the ride and do what he's told. But the other characters, Kublai, Hundred Eyes, Lady Chabi etc. are interesting and played wonderfully. Can't wait for season 2. Hopefully the producers aren't discouraged by the wisearse critics and will keep making this wonderful show.    … Expand
  22. normanx
    Dec 18, 2014
    9
    For whatever reason, the critics saw the first episode and wrote off the series... Their loss. This is not your daddy's Richard Chamberlain/Shogun... this is violent, sexy, deviant and filled with peril and wonder. When "Users" ....based on a hundred reviews see it as an 8.2 and critics are at a mere 48... somebody is not doing their job. Watch it. Hate it, or love it... it is a veryFor whatever reason, the critics saw the first episode and wrote off the series... Their loss. This is not your daddy's Richard Chamberlain/Shogun... this is violent, sexy, deviant and filled with peril and wonder. When "Users" ....based on a hundred reviews see it as an 8.2 and critics are at a mere 48... somebody is not doing their job. Watch it. Hate it, or love it... it is a very dynamic series-portrayed in lush film production...… Expand
  23. kamiyamaninja1
    Dec 18, 2014
    10
    this was a very interesting and exciting series.
    I was extremely pleased with the story and quality of acting.
    Beautiful people and awesome sets.. at times breath taking.
    More shows should be made like this..
    The kung fu master was awesome and really added to the story line.. very smart adding this to the plot..
  24. ralphrepo
    Dec 18, 2014
    9
    Compared to GOT in its entirety? No. But when stacked against just GOT season 1? Yes, it holds its own. Polo has a lot pulling for it too, given the semi-historical and non-fantasy setting. Also, it showcases the able language and acting ability of Asian talent in what is arguably a fully English speaking production, without subtitles nor stilted "Fu Manchu" accents. In essence, probablyCompared to GOT in its entirety? No. But when stacked against just GOT season 1? Yes, it holds its own. Polo has a lot pulling for it too, given the semi-historical and non-fantasy setting. Also, it showcases the able language and acting ability of Asian talent in what is arguably a fully English speaking production, without subtitles nor stilted "Fu Manchu" accents. In essence, probably the first western made epic in which the central Chinese figure isn't portrayed by a white actor dressed in Asian wardrobe. Nicely done!… Expand
  25. PixelIntruder
    Dec 17, 2014
    3
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. It’s starts out amazingly well, at least it did for me. But by episode six or so you reach some absolute ridiculousness with a big “whodunit” where your seemingly smart protagonist goes around vulnerable and unreinforced asking potential guilty mastermind villains, “Hey, do you happen to the dangerous bad guy were looking for who’s trying to stay hidden, is very powerful, and possibly dislikes me? And if not could you give us directions to where we can find him? Please be truthful!!!”

    Then by that point the once quite large show of massive armies and wars between giant nation empires of legend becomes infuriatingly small and limiting. There is no interaction with “extra-level” peasants or army-folk or anybody, you start to just bounce between the same seven or so characters and a formula starts to stick out and poke you in the eye and you start to notice just how cheesy and B-movie the lines and dialogue actually are.

    Worse, with the great and terrible Kublai Khan character who’s keeping the entire show together, it unintentionally just becomes more and more apparent that the actor playing the character MUST BE in real life a quite jovial, comedically funny man, always laughing and telling a joke. And so the earlier well-crafted illusion of the larger than life, dangerous, unpredictable character slowly unravels (after already being gravely wounded in believability by a clumsy earlier physical confrontation with another character).

    Then the already goofy, cheesy, and cartoonish Kung Fu aspect of the show that has pulled you out of the good character drama from the start with a funny-looking blind Kung Fu master who spins around seemingly more than a man really needs to, causing loud whooshing sounds, grates on you worse and worse.

    And you can no longer forgive the show that the opposing force and power in this supposedly enormous scale opera for the great Mongolian Horde is confined to a unexplainably, scared, crabby old woman and a two-dimensional, run-of-the-mill, ever-so-flimsy, psychopathic bad guy that never has made any sense.

    And the biggest thing to bug the viewer’s mind is your lovable protagonist is an apparent, crazed, lady-stalker who becomes obsessed with a woman simply because she is the only woman on the continent to wear blue garments rather than drab, Mongolian-Horde-fashions, and likes to mysteriously ride out to the only tree that grows in all of Mongolia.

    And this unexplainable fascination continues on and on, made worse by the fact the show’s writers never give us a reason to like her. Not a one. They actually provide us with a separate female character who wrestles men that we love and would love for our protagonist to love but we’re stuck with some random girl who wears blue clothes and does nothing of note and who there is nothing remarkable about.

    Oh, and the continuous assault on the viewer with naked women and breasts gets ever so tedious. It’s hard to understand that the show writers don’t realize that most people have internet access and far more intimate stuff is a click away for most viewers. So enough is enough as it becomes very distracting at times from the plot, characters, and drama. (And not distracting in a “good way” even if you are a young heterosexual male viewer).

    So now at episode seven or eight with my protagonist having appeared to have “completely drank the Kublai Khan Kool-Aid” more completely than I find credible for the character and his arc at this point in the show, I think I have to pull the plug on Netflix’s Marco Polo.

    ADDITIONAL NOTE - The cinematography, musical score, the casting, the majority of the acting, and more is all very amazing. This is an incredible production in many, many ways. A lot of very talented people worked on this. It's just certain weaknesses in regards to certain aspects of the show drag it down, at least for this humble viewer.    … Expand
  26. Phix105
    Dec 17, 2014
    10
    I thought this was one of the best new shows that I have watched in a long time. The critics prove once again that they have no clue what most people like. It's not as good as Game of Thrones but I would rate it really close.
  27. nick14ch
    Dec 17, 2014
    10
    I had very low expectations after reading critics reviews but after watching the series I have no idea why it got rated so badly. It s true that the pilot isn't great and a bit slow but the show gets better and better. Production and costumes are amazing, the cast is great (although I do agree that the main actor is not charismatic enough) and the plot is gripping. Definitely recommended
  28. Ezekius
    Dec 16, 2014
    10
    Walked in expecting nothing. This show was way better then I thought it could be. I did not like the pilot, and it almost made me stop watching, but I stuck it out a few more episodes and the show got way better. Hope there is a next season!
  29. astralboy79
    Dec 16, 2014
    10
    brilliant...in one sitting watched the first 4 episodes, smooth flow. ignore the critic reviews, its one jem of a show....digging the mongol lifestyle, hot women, tensions and war. Can see its not a cheap show and care has been put into every detail including camera work, costumes, music. i wish for season II.
  30. nodesman
    Dec 16, 2014
    10
    I don't know what the critics are looking for really. This is a good show. If they want a mongolian Game of Thrones, then this isn't it. Fine. This is Marco Polo. Game of thrones isn't sufficiently Marco Polo. Your turn Critics. In other words - there is not much of a difference between this and game of thrones.

    Except in this show a lot more things happen in a single episode than does    I don't know what the critics are looking for really. This is a good show. If they want a mongolian Game of Thrones, then this isn't it. Fine. This is Marco Polo. Game of thrones isn't sufficiently Marco Polo. Your turn Critics. In other words - there is not much of a difference between this and game of thrones.

    Except in this show a lot more things happen in a single episode than does in GoT. It is very engaging and has a healthy balance of exciting moments and drama.

    The screen play is very good. It looks freaking expensive. The actors behind Kublai Khan and Hundred Eyes played in incredibly well.

    Some critics complain about the amount of nudity in it. There is no more nudity in this than in any other show that are running strong right now.    … Expand
  31. PoeticDumpling
    Dec 16, 2014
    8
    I am voting based on only two episodes thus far, but I am flabberghasted to see such low reviews from critics. This show is fantastic and thrilling! The acting isn't out of this world, but it isn't by any means bad either. The culture is fresh, the scale is sweeping, the action adventure is cranked up. I have no complaints thus far. Perhaps I will add an upadated review after furtherI am voting based on only two episodes thus far, but I am flabberghasted to see such low reviews from critics. This show is fantastic and thrilling! The acting isn't out of this world, but it isn't by any means bad either. The culture is fresh, the scale is sweeping, the action adventure is cranked up. I have no complaints thus far. Perhaps I will add an upadated review after further episodes or season 1 completion.… Expand
  32. baford
    Dec 15, 2014
    8
    Marco Polo accomplished what it set out to do: entertain me as a viewer. The show is historically inaccurate, but then again I don't expect most modern day shows to serve as a history lesson. I enjoyed the show from the first episode, and I was pleased that the show continually improved throughout the season. I notice that a lot of critics are giving this show low ratings and there seemsMarco Polo accomplished what it set out to do: entertain me as a viewer. The show is historically inaccurate, but then again I don't expect most modern day shows to serve as a history lesson. I enjoyed the show from the first episode, and I was pleased that the show continually improved throughout the season. I notice that a lot of critics are giving this show low ratings and there seems to be a cliche of Game of Thrones comparisons. I can kinda see the point they are making: Both shows are on a high budget, 10 episodes long, extremely violent, contain shady politics and sex, and filmed at exotic locations. Is that really "new" though? Take the show for what it is; an entertaining series that is historically inaccurate yet still catches the essence of the time period with mild cultural insight (albeit a bit cliche). I found the series to be interesting from the first episode and enjoyed the season as it gradually improved with each episode. I hope the show gets a second season, and look forward to continuing Netflix's fictional account of Marco Polo.… Expand
  33. rwieland
    Dec 15, 2014
    8
    The comparison to GOT is misleading. It's an epic historical drama like HBO's Rome. And I think what the critics mean when they say there's no characters to care about is that there aren't enough white people in it. It's beautiful and entertaining and the only way you could be bored by it is if you are too small minded to appreciate what it offers. I think non-American critics will reviewThe comparison to GOT is misleading. It's an epic historical drama like HBO's Rome. And I think what the critics mean when they say there's no characters to care about is that there aren't enough white people in it. It's beautiful and entertaining and the only way you could be bored by it is if you are too small minded to appreciate what it offers. I think non-American critics will review this much more favourably. It's the best thing on Netflix right now in my opinion.… Expand
  34. Mazmorrero47
    Dec 15, 2014
    5
    Netflix's 90 million dollar collaboration with The Weinstein Company is a mixed bag. Its technical aspects are beautifully crafted. The cinematography in particular has some creative uses of high contrast illumination. The armors, weapons, sets, etc. have a lot of attention to detail.
    Unfortunately, Marco Polo lacks compelling characters and story that encourage binge-watching (the    Netflix's 90 million dollar collaboration with The Weinstein Company is a mixed bag. Its technical aspects are beautifully crafted. The cinematography in particular has some creative uses of high contrast illumination. The armors, weapons, sets, etc. have a lot of attention to detail.
    Unfortunately, Marco Polo lacks compelling characters and story that encourage binge-watching (the sluggish pacing and stilted dialog don't help much to the cause either). For starters, its title is misleading, since Marco Polo is NOT the protagonist. In fact, the scenes where he appears are the most boring. The actor who plays him doesn't have any charisma or range, so it's hard to understand why the Khan is so mesmerized with his descriptions and several women feel sexually attracted to him. In all fairness though, the rest of the characters aren't any better because they all have one single trait: Hundred Eyes-disciplined, Jingim-jealous, Sidao-evil, etc. which makes them more caricatures than fleshed-out human beings. Their motivations are simplistic at best and nonsensical at worst.
    And of course, what would a period show be without the gratuitous nudity? Marco Polo gives Game of Thrones a run for its money in that regard. Even the female characters that are supposed to be "strong" and "independent" end up being objectified. Netflix is trying too hard.
    Marco Polo came out with great timing, since it fills the hole left by the TV holiday hiatus. In any other time of the year, there are much better options to check.    … Expand
  35. jwai
    Dec 15, 2014
    9
    I'll say this: I'm very picky about the shows I invest my time in. This is one of those rare shows. There's just something about it. Maybe it's the lavish set pieces and costumes or its Eastern flavor or the sweeping landscape backdrops. Whatever it is, it got me watching and talking and telling my friends to give it try. Sure, it borrows liberally from Game of Thrones but I found theI'll say this: I'm very picky about the shows I invest my time in. This is one of those rare shows. There's just something about it. Maybe it's the lavish set pieces and costumes or its Eastern flavor or the sweeping landscape backdrops. Whatever it is, it got me watching and talking and telling my friends to give it try. Sure, it borrows liberally from Game of Thrones but I found the captivating beauty and sheer scale of this production far outweighs the occasional imitative annoyances. Seeing the workmanship in crafting this epic alone is worth the price of admission. So give it try. You won't be disappointed.… Expand
  36. ImSedated
    Dec 15, 2014
    8
    At first, I thought the show to be cheesy with the accents and lack there of. Maybe if it were in English subtitles, I would give it a 9 or 10. However, by the third episode I was hooked and watched the show from beginning to end. What annoyed me in the beginning quickly faded.

    The show had many plots, intriguing side stories and from a chick's perspective, good fighting scenes.    At first, I thought the show to be cheesy with the accents and lack there of. Maybe if it were in English subtitles, I would give it a 9 or 10. However, by the third episode I was hooked and watched the show from beginning to end. What annoyed me in the beginning quickly faded.

    The show had many plots, intriguing side stories and from a chick's perspective, good fighting scenes.
    I'm not sure what the "critics" are watching but it's not the new Netflix Original Marco Polo.    … Expand
  37. Foka
    Dec 15, 2014
    10
    Excellent. I watched all 10 eps in one shot! The story is not deep and complex like GoT, but still good. The character are well designed and the landscapes are awesome. Nice fighting scenes as well.
  38. KMV
    Dec 14, 2014
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I think some critics are taking this show a bit too seriously. I too would have liked it to be a bit more feasible, and less exploitive of women (not sure the nude harem scene was entirely necessary to the plot). But its got a lot going for it. Basically, you have to accept that this is like a less sophisticated "Game of Thrones" - great cinematography, less characters (and truthfully, less character development), but a lot of the same sword and schemes excitement. There are characters and plot lines I did care about, some great bad guys, and a moment of sacrifice I really did find believable and touching.

    And its good points are good enough, that its plot holes and melodrama become kind of a fun game, questions you can save up (Minor SPOILER ALERT): like, why is a 100 pound courtesan able to fight like a character from "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon"? Are we really supposed to believe that the best swordsman in the Mongol lands is completely blind? If you're going to send a spy into an enemy Chinese city, wouldn't you pick someone who wouldn't draw attention, rather than the only European they're likely to have ever seen?

    Marco Polo isn't 'must-see' TV. But if you're looking for something fun and exciting in this genre, it should make for a fun evening.    … Expand
  39. sundangkalis
    Dec 14, 2014
    3
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This original Netflix series premiered on 12/12/14. I have since watched the first 4 episodes and will not watch it anymore. It basically is a combination of Game of Thrones, and Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon. It copies a lot of the graphic nudity and violence of GoT, but it doesn't provide the varied and diverse number of characters of that series nor does it develop many of its characters motives well like GoT did. It is only in some of the supporting roles that you see any interesting characters. Kublai Khan, played by Benedict Wong, and Chabi, Kublai's Empress, played by Joan Chen are very well played and deep. Olivia Cheng as consort, Meilin is also interesting. Sadly their talents are wated in this production by the boredom provided by the other actors. Lorenzo Richelmy, who plays the lead role, is flat and sleep inducing as the lead, Marco Polo. He tries to provide the naivety of youth in his role, without providing the same wonderment and curiosity that a role like that would require. Even the actors that play Marco's father and uncles seem unmotivated and uninteresting. Also, some of the non-Asian advisers of Kublai Khan, such as the Yusuf, played by Amir Waked are lifeless and two dimensional.

    The other thing horrible about this show is the fight choreography. In original Chinese martial arts movies, the moves and techniques are meant to be spectacular and impossible. The characters fly around, and attempt moves that a real person could not do. It is far removed from real life fighting. What makes the fighting in this series bad is they copy some of the elaborate, flowing movements of Chinese movies like Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, but try too hard to tone it down and make it seem realistic. What eventually happens is the martial arts in this series is neither fantastic nor realistic, and is rather unimpressive when compared to the originals. If they wanted to make Kung Fu more direct and realistic they should have tried to imitate the choreography of Bruce Lee in his movies like Game of Death or Enter The Dragon, as Bruce Lee was trying to make Kung Fu more realistic and brutal in those movies. In copying the choreography of Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon but trying to make it more graphic and raw, they eliminate everything that made the fighting in Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon so spectacular and that was how unbelievable and fantastic it was.

    Overall I would not recommend this series. It is trying to be too many things at once and does not do any of them well.    … Expand
  40. sholmes019
    Dec 14, 2014
    10
    If you like naked women, gore, and action, then Marco Polo is for you. In my opinion that's all a show really needs along with half decent acting. I never read what the critics have to say about shows on this website. I only read what the every day people have to say. Critics tend to have the worst opinions on anything while the people tend to have a more down to earth view on things. TheIf you like naked women, gore, and action, then Marco Polo is for you. In my opinion that's all a show really needs along with half decent acting. I never read what the critics have to say about shows on this website. I only read what the every day people have to say. Critics tend to have the worst opinions on anything while the people tend to have a more down to earth view on things. The fact that Marco Polo had high reviews among the people and low reviews among the critics supports this.… Expand
  41. dgauss
    Dec 14, 2014
    9
    Half way through the first season and I am in love with it. While the first two episodes are a slow with plot build up, by the 4th you are pulled into the world of Marco Polo and the drama that surrounds him.

    I am not watching this as a historical piece but for entertainment. I am also not a historian so I can not speak to its accuracy. What I can tell you is the show has not    Half way through the first season and I am in love with it. While the first two episodes are a slow with plot build up, by the 4th you are pulled into the world of Marco Polo and the drama that surrounds him.

    I am not watching this as a historical piece but for entertainment. I am also not a historian so I can not speak to its accuracy. What I can tell you is the show has not disappointing me at all and it just seems to be getting better and better.

    If you have Netflix I recommend you give this a good watch.    … Expand
  42. alexanderb2
    Dec 14, 2014
    9
    Registered just because I finished first season and saw "unfair" reviews by critics. Firstly, few things I can agree yes acting is maybe not best you can find you are used to, but it's so refreshing to see some new faces who do still act well (to be honest I'm so tired of few actors who are just in mostly each series no matter they fit or not, even so they are great overall). I'm EuropeanRegistered just because I finished first season and saw "unfair" reviews by critics. Firstly, few things I can agree yes acting is maybe not best you can find you are used to, but it's so refreshing to see some new faces who do still act well (to be honest I'm so tired of few actors who are just in mostly each series no matter they fit or not, even so they are great overall). I'm European so not Chinese expert but have few friends from central Asia and it was very refreshing to see some Kazakhs and Mongol faces playing Mongols and their thick accent which some people do not like is in my opinion is amazing and add so much more colour to the movie. Story is great and very close to what I have red back in the years about polo and post Genghis Khan era in china. The view on steps with hundred horses riding is just amazing. I do recommend anyone who like "historical" movies to watch it. It is maybe one of the best series you will see along with "Rome" and very few others.… Expand
  43. Polofan
    Dec 14, 2014
    10
    I registered to write this review for Marco Polo after having my expectations for Marco Polo unfairly lowered by what I now see as ignorant critics.

    Usually, I think critics get it right. If some show has a low score on metacritic it is usually not worth watching. I had been waiting for the release of Marco Polo with anticipation, but as the early reviews began coming in I started to    I registered to write this review for Marco Polo after having my expectations for Marco Polo unfairly lowered by what I now see as ignorant critics.

    Usually, I think critics get it right. If some show has a low score on metacritic it is usually not worth watching. I had been waiting for the release of Marco Polo with anticipation, but as the early reviews began coming in I started to think the show was almost unwatchable and easily forgettable.

    I now know that this was a totally wrong mindset. The critics have got it wrong on this one and why they derided this show as a bunch of crying hyneas is a good question. I see no justification for the low ratings it has had.

    A lot of the early critique seems centered on the acting and dialogue. I agree that the dialogue for the early episodes may have been a bit off but I am now on the 9th episode and I think the dialogue is now extremely good and on a par with Game of Thrones. The acting fo the main character has also been criticised as boring and without passion. I actually think the producers made the right choice in making Marco Polo be subdued as a character. The central role of Marco Polo is not to be the centre of attention but more an observer of the Khan's court. The really colourful characters are the Chinese and Mongols and I think this is why some Western critics have lambasted the show so much. A lot of Western critics are simply full of ethnocentrism so when they see a show like Marco Polo they invariably compare it to Game of Thrones whose Pseudo-European Medieval universe is known to most TV and Film viewers. They totally fail to appreciate how Marco Polo is set in a culture that is far removed from what Game of Thrones would have us believe the Medieval world of Power politics looked like. This is Asia which is a continent with as many varied cultures as Europe. Marco Polo shows that really well by having the court of the Khan stocked with foreigners who at one point or another seem to have been enslaved by the Mongols - this makes their loyalty interesting to question. The differences between Mongol culture and Chinese is also well depicted - Chinese culture being more adept at diplomacy and cunning and the Mongols being influenced by Chinese culture while still relying on brute force as the foundation of their power.

    There are so many good reasons to love this show and I very much hope fans will support it and prove the critics wrong. If this show is a one season wonder then it is a travesty when other crappy shows like Walking Dead get rave reviews and run season after season. With Marco Polo Netflix has once gain raised the bar and made a show that normal TV channels should produce but don't produce because they are old-fashioned and ethnocentric.    … Expand
  44. DrHutch
    Dec 14, 2014
    7
    Setting aside the terrible historical inaccuracies (of which there are many) and the troubling stereotypes that crop up about Chinese and Mongolian culture, the show as a work of fiction is on par with the quality of Game of Thrones. While it does not have the same epic sweep, its a ability to move between locations on the social hierarchy and its avoidance of sexposition in favour ofSetting aside the terrible historical inaccuracies (of which there are many) and the troubling stereotypes that crop up about Chinese and Mongolian culture, the show as a work of fiction is on par with the quality of Game of Thrones. While it does not have the same epic sweep, its a ability to move between locations on the social hierarchy and its avoidance of sexposition in favour of exploring sensuality as a system of power and authority make it in some ways superior to its HBO cousin. Yet, the dialogue is, as many critics have pointed out, weak. At times, too, the motivations of characters, especially villainous ones, are too one-dimensional to be believable. Is this the greatest show on television? No. Nor is it the weakest among the growing number of epics.… Expand
  45. thehawk
    Dec 14, 2014
    5
    I should have known what to expect when I noticed that Marco on the promo poster looked too much like Tyrion Lannister. So when the regulation sex scenes duly appeared I thought this will be Game Of Chinese Thrones. No such luck.

    As one critic wrote the first episode was poor, imo due to some very bland dialogue and acting. Sound was poor and there were a few meaningless scenes.    I should have known what to expect when I noticed that Marco on the promo poster looked too much like Tyrion Lannister. So when the regulation sex scenes duly appeared I thought this will be Game Of Chinese Thrones. No such luck.

    As one critic wrote the first episode was poor, imo due to some very bland dialogue and acting. Sound was poor and there were a few meaningless scenes. Episode 2 improved a bit. Modern accents and some modern idioms crept in every so often which was jarring.
    The historical representation was bad. Cities hundreds of miles apart were just down the road. The Golden Horde lived in a few tents. Their horses, in reality able to run for a day without stopping, could not cross a small desert without grain. Water off a duck's back for Mongol horsemen. And would they have cared if half died in the journey? - not a chance.

    As with a lot of these films and series, a good chance lost to use historical re-enactors to increase immersion.

    OK, enough complaining about poor production quality. The real problem is lack of an exciting plot. There is no character build-up. All the characters are shallow, even Marco. And even the gimmicks were weak - with one exception - Tom Wu who was VG as Hundred Eyes.    … Expand
  46. UncleEarl
    Dec 13, 2014
    10
    NOTE: I will mostly mention the few flaws in the show. In truth, the positives of the show more than outweighed the negatives and there just isn't enough room to write about them. Go watch the show.

    First few episodes have some dumb Confucian-type dialogue that the writers probably thought would help highlight the eastern setting but it kind of falls flat. The dialogue gets better    NOTE: I will mostly mention the few flaws in the show. In truth, the positives of the show more than outweighed the negatives and there just isn't enough room to write about them. Go watch the show.

    First few episodes have some dumb Confucian-type dialogue that the writers probably thought would help highlight the eastern setting but it kind of falls flat. The dialogue gets better around the third episode or so and the exposition gives way to the quick pace the rest of the season enjoys.

    There are a lot of exciting and outrageous fight scenes all throughout the show and they're really captivating. Critics have complained about these scenes. "This woman fights 3 guys by herself while she's naked! This is so sexist! The writers and directors are pigs!" You're missing the whole point. The fights are stylistic and fantastical as a nod to the choreography that eastern films are legendary for. One woman fights naked because she lulled the men trying to screw her into a false sense of security and then she pounced while they didn't expect it. This is practical, not sexist or whatever you want to label it.

    I don't even have to mention the cinematography, atmosphere, music, set design. It's all impeccable and money well spent.

    Aside from the dialogue issues that don't reappear after the first 2 episodes, My only other gripe is how illogically loyal and naive the character Marco Polo is. It's a shame we don't see him crush his foes when he has a chance. He tries to make everyone happy, and we all know you can't please everyone all the time. But still, the rest of the characters are ruthless enough for him. They dictate the pace of the plot, not Marco, which would seem fitting since this is their home court, not his. Overall, this show was a wonderful experience and the low critical reviews say a lot about the authority of critics who weren't able to accurately appraise the program.

    10/10 binge-watched this in one night instead of writing my final paper    … Expand
  47. daTruth
    Dec 13, 2014
    3
    I get the feeling that most of the positive reviews are from people that haven't actually watched the show. The writing was atrocious and boring. That's fine if the action makes up for it, but it doesn't. There are only a handful of actions scenes throughout the 10 episodes and the rest of the show is just terrible dialog (like someone with no writing skills was simply dictating aI get the feeling that most of the positive reviews are from people that haven't actually watched the show. The writing was atrocious and boring. That's fine if the action makes up for it, but it doesn't. There are only a handful of actions scenes throughout the 10 episodes and the rest of the show is just terrible dialog (like someone with no writing skills was simply dictating a conversation). They spent 90 million on this thing and I honestly don't know where it wall went, but it certainly didn't go toward writing a decent manuscript.… Expand
  48. sandwalker
    Dec 13, 2014
    9
    I notice most critics' reviews are based on only the first 1-2 episodes. This is a series that gets better and better as it goes along, until the climactic final episode that pays off in a big way. Keep watching - it's worth it.
  49. ssmater
    Dec 13, 2014
    10
    I am surprised how negative some of the critics reviews are. On of them wrote "..undermined by ponderously self-important writing". Well yes, it is self-important, it's supposed to be self-important. This is a movie about the Great Khan, the Khan of Khans, the Ruler of the Silk Road and the World, whose name terrified people from Central Europe to Chinese Coast. If you don't the get powerI am surprised how negative some of the critics reviews are. On of them wrote "..undermined by ponderously self-important writing". Well yes, it is self-important, it's supposed to be self-important. This is a movie about the Great Khan, the Khan of Khans, the Ruler of the Silk Road and the World, whose name terrified people from Central Europe to Chinese Coast. If you don't the get power of the Mongols and the fear they created in the civilized World, this is not a show for you. I also noticed that this movie feels like a very smooth mixture of Eastern and Western cinema.… Expand
  50. MixedFeelings
    Dec 13, 2014
    10
    I have to hand it to Netflix for this incredible series. Cinematography stunning throughout the whole series. Engaging plot. At first I didn't expect much due to the low rating but that changed after 2 episodes in. I binged the rest of the episodes in a day and no complaints. It may feel a little weird having all these asian characters speaking english but don't let that discourage youI have to hand it to Netflix for this incredible series. Cinematography stunning throughout the whole series. Engaging plot. At first I didn't expect much due to the low rating but that changed after 2 episodes in. I binged the rest of the episodes in a day and no complaints. It may feel a little weird having all these asian characters speaking english but don't let that discourage you from watching this spectacular.

    Its a shame to have a good show get bashed by critics who watched like one episode. It may not be game of thrones but this show definitely deserves more than a metascore of 25. So stop comparing it to GoT. Why do I have a feeling that cable networks like HBO paid the critics off to eliminate competition? If Netflix continues to produce quality shows like this, they will continue to have my support. No amount of bad reviews from **** critics will stop me from watching this and neither should it you.    … Expand
  51. RenanAAlmeida
    Dec 13, 2014
    9
    Critics need to relax a little bit. The show isn't nearly as bad as they're making it sound like. Beautifully shot and directed. The writing could be better? Yes. But that doesn't mean it's terrible, it just need improvement. Just because you don't see familiar faces everywhere like you expect in big american productions doesn't mean the show is bad. The way that they used a latin actor toCritics need to relax a little bit. The show isn't nearly as bad as they're making it sound like. Beautifully shot and directed. The writing could be better? Yes. But that doesn't mean it's terrible, it just need improvement. Just because you don't see familiar faces everywhere like you expect in big american productions doesn't mean the show is bad. The way that they used a latin actor to do latin character and every chinese/mongol character they used real chinese actors is simply... well... awesome. Can't wait to see more of this show and I expect it to be renewed, but if the viewership doesn't pay off its big budget I will be really sad if its only destiny is cancellation.… Expand
  52. lizardrath
    Dec 13, 2014
    10
    I spend weeks sometimes looking for interesting, mature and sophisticated shows and Marco Polo is all that! This is the first review I have ever written and it is in response to the unbelievable bad "critics" review of this epic series. Beautiful scenes, well thought out dialogue and plots...yeah, Game of Thrones is good (but doesn't quite live up to the books - too fast paced and lostI spend weeks sometimes looking for interesting, mature and sophisticated shows and Marco Polo is all that! This is the first review I have ever written and it is in response to the unbelievable bad "critics" review of this epic series. Beautiful scenes, well thought out dialogue and plots...yeah, Game of Thrones is good (but doesn't quite live up to the books - too fast paced and lost important details!). Marco Polo is a clear winner! With all the immature, unbelievable shows on TV, you think critics could see a good thing if right in front of their face! Makes me wonder if there is a little politics going on here between traditional TV and online...… Expand
  53. Readsalot
    Dec 13, 2014
    0
    I agree with the critics, the pilot was so terrible I probably won't watch the remaining episodes. I am so disappointed in Netflix. This kind of low brow fodder is what I expect from the Major Networks sans the nudity. These positive reviews from viewers are kind of frightening.
  54. robreefer
    Dec 13, 2014
    5
    A fairly mediocre show.

    The acting isn't that great but production value is obviously through the roof. The thick accents are very annoying. You may need to turn on the subtitles or really blast the audio. Also, I hate to sound racist but it is VERY hard to tell the characters apart as most of them are Asian and look alike. The story line is a bit hard to follow. It sort of just    A fairly mediocre show.

    The acting isn't that great but production value is obviously through the roof. The thick accents are very annoying. You may need to turn on the subtitles or really blast the audio. Also, I hate to sound racist but it is VERY hard to tell the characters apart as most of them are Asian and look alike.

    The story line is a bit hard to follow. It sort of just bounces around and in no discernible direction. Some of the nude scenes are a little lowbrow and seem a bit forced merely for shock value or added male interest.

    Overall I would suggest it to others considering there is literally NOTHING else to watch at the moment while all the good television is on hiatus.    … Expand
  55. xMonkeykingx
    Dec 13, 2014
    10
    Critics are biased as hell. They compare this to got and thats basically like saying, why cant my new born baby drive a car? This show is good but new. The first season of got is exremely boring and I stopped after the second episode. This however is interesting and exciting. A show shouldnt tell the users that its going to be better. It should be shown.
  56. skurvypete
    Dec 13, 2014
    9
    I've watched 3 episodes of it so far and it is fantastic.Critics of course are comparing it to Game Of Thrones which has had 4 seasons to develop it's formula while Marco polo has had 1. It gets pretty sad when one review's main criticism is the dark lighting. Remember that the first season of GoT was a bit of a snooze fest until the last three episodes. Overall Marco Polo is great seriesI've watched 3 episodes of it so far and it is fantastic.Critics of course are comparing it to Game Of Thrones which has had 4 seasons to develop it's formula while Marco polo has had 1. It gets pretty sad when one review's main criticism is the dark lighting. Remember that the first season of GoT was a bit of a snooze fest until the last three episodes. Overall Marco Polo is great series for people who enjoy historical dramas such as Rome, The tudors, and GoT.… Expand
  57. Mendozer03
    Dec 12, 2014
    9
    I have seen only the first two episodes. That being said, I believe this will be a great series, as long as they keep up what they're doing. While it is no Game of Thrones, I do believe this should be getting better scores from the critics than it is currently is. Honestly, I saw someone gave it a 25! What the actual **** What kind of unlearned amateurs do they have reviewing shows?
  58. Wrz77
    Dec 12, 2014
    10
    Truly a superb show. The expensive production really shines in both CGI of structures, sets, costumes, sound, cinematography, and all other aspects that I could discern. There is a perfect balance of complex geopolitical scenes that highlight the culture and politics of the Mongols in the 13th century and also a tasteful amount of action.

    This is another diamond in the rough drama    Truly a superb show. The expensive production really shines in both CGI of structures, sets, costumes, sound, cinematography, and all other aspects that I could discern. There is a perfect balance of complex geopolitical scenes that highlight the culture and politics of the Mongols in the 13th century and also a tasteful amount of action.

    This is another diamond in the rough drama series that rewards paying attention and where one will pickup more detail on future re-watches. But also one can watch it casually and still understand the plot.
    Absolutely no characters seemed one dimensional and they all had colorful and dynamic backgrounds and interesting traits.
    Sex scenes are also tastefully done unlike many TV-MA shows where they seem like filler and run on for way too long.

    Cinematography: 5/5 - The colorful sets and outdoor scenes alike are breathtaking and really pull you in. I was fully absorbed within the first 10 minutes of watching.

    Acting: 4/5 - I found the acting on the level of Game of Thrones and other hit drama series.
    Plot: 5/5 - The most important aspect of any drama movie or TV series is the plot, in my opinion, and this does not disappoint. It goes into the complex geopolitics of the Mongols and explores it without dragging on, seeming like filler, or becoming boring.

    Picture Quality: 4/5 - I watched in Super HD on a 40" display and did not notice any macroblocking or other common artifacts associated with bitrate starvation.
    The only nitpick I have is the aspect ratio not being 16:9 as all other modern TV series are. However, the black bars are extremely minimal and nowhere near as big as movies often have so it was not distracting.

    Audio: 5/5 - I only have a 2.0 sound system so I listened to the Stereo mix which sounds very different than the Dolby DD+ 5.1 mix - on my 2.0 system the Stereo mix sounded like it was optimized specifically for 2.0 systems rather than a cheap downmix from 5.1.
    The musical score really adds to the tone and feel of the show and I find the quality of the compositions to rival John Williams or other big names in film.    … Expand
  59. Doxide
    Dec 12, 2014
    9
    This show is much more enjoyable than the critics would have you believe. There is so much rich historical detail and for the most part, the cast does a great job (especially the actor who plays Kublai). The setting of this show is so completely unique to American television that it's a joy just watching for the sights and sounds. There are a few downsides however. In the first fewThis show is much more enjoyable than the critics would have you believe. There is so much rich historical detail and for the most part, the cast does a great job (especially the actor who plays Kublai). The setting of this show is so completely unique to American television that it's a joy just watching for the sights and sounds. There are a few downsides however. In the first few episodes, there is a distinct lack of direction. The plot just meanders along, and you're never really given an idea of what the overall story-arch will be. And some of the dialogue is so cliche and ham-fisted, it sounds like it was ripped straight from an old kung fu movie. I blame the writers for this entirely. The actors for the most part do an admirable job. But for some reason, the writers felt the need to build up the "exoticness" or the people by making them sound like Asian stereotypes. The smart thing would have been to simply let the setting and cultural differences speak for themselves. However if you can overlook these shortcomings, Marco Polo offers some great entertainment for TV fans (and especially history buffs).… Expand
  60. SimonPoole
    Dec 12, 2014
    9
    I enjoyed the first few episodes more than the critic reviews would suggest.
    The overall tone so far is extremely rich - the $90 million pricetag really shows in the overall production quality as the settings, direction and music are all top-notch.

    The actors behind Kublai Khan and Hundred Eyes really smashes the role too, however the lead actor doesn't quite live up to the hype so far.
  61. jaykota123
    Dec 12, 2014
    8
    The first episode is surprisingly good and far better than the reviews let out. It may not match Game of Thrones but then they don't explicitly say they are aiming for that level- only the media seems to make that comparison.

    Frankly I found it interesting and something I am willing to watch through the 10 episodes- unless the quality tanks. That said- it may also be due to a lack    The first episode is surprisingly good and far better than the reviews let out. It may not match Game of Thrones but then they don't explicitly say they are aiming for that level- only the media seems to make that comparison.

    Frankly I found it interesting and something I am willing to watch through the 10 episodes- unless the quality tanks.

    That said- it may also be due to a lack of anything good out there right now besides homeland and walking dead.    … Expand
next
Page:

Awards & Rankings

2
#2 Most Discussed TV Season of 2014
32
#32 Most Shared TV Season of 2014

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
48

Mixed or average reviews - based on 21 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 21
  2. Mixed: 9 out of 21
  3. Negative: 7 out of 21
  1. New York Magazine (Vulture)
    Reviewed by: Margaret Lyons
    Dec 15, 2014
    30
    The show is vacant and uninspiring, so much so that I'd rather fill my imaginary home with ball utensils than watch Marco Polo.
    Read full review
  2. People Weekly
    Reviewed by: Tom Gliatto
    Dec 15, 2014
    70
    A fun, body-flinging, old-fashioned epic.... As Kublai Khan, British actor Benedict Wong gives an impressive performance, one of the best of the year: You absolutely believe his ruthlessness, his power and his calculating thoughtfulness. As Marco Polo, on the other hand, Italian actor Lorenzo Richelmy, who looks like a more lyrical Emile Hirsch, mostly has to be put up with.
    Read full review
  3. The Wrap
    Reviewed by: Mekeisha Madden Toby
    Dec 15, 2014
    70
    Ultimately, once viewers overcome the sluggish pace there’s something for everyone with Marco Polo. History lovers will enjoy Googling along with the series as historical names and battles are introduced while martial arts fans will appreciate the intricately choreographed fight scenes. Although the series isn’t as riveting as “Game of Thrones,” strong performances and impeccable visuals make it worthy of a watch on a slow and rainy afternoon.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »