MacGyver (2016)

:

Season 1
  • Network: CBS
  • Series Premiere Date: Sep 23, 2016
Season #: 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
User Score
4.0

Mixed or average reviews- based on 146 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 47 out of 146
  2. Mixed: 19 out of 146
  3. Negative: 80 out of 146
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Stream On
Stream On

Review this tv show

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

User Reviews

view
per page
  1. eagleeyeviking
    Oct 1, 2016
    3
    Unlike the pheonix, the breezily paced MacGyver (2016) stays in the ashes, with bland characters, episode plots that are too similar to procedurals, underwhelming CGI and over-the top stakes.
  2. lfhlaw
    Oct 3, 2016
    1
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I watched the original series of Macgyver and this has nothing on it. I have an open mind and i tried to watch it, but it seems to have such low redeeming values IMO. First, the captions/explanations are stupid and from the 2 episodes they explain stuff to me like I'm a dolt. in the 2nd episode, he's making explosives? that was not the Original Macgyver. Having Jack Dalton being his best friend with a Gun? Ugly....now the new generation may eat it up, but I'm hoping that it gets cancelled soon and they just decide to burn off the episodes. I don't think i could tolerate this iteration getting more than one season. Also why in every episode does he have to say his full name- -"Hi I'm Angus Macgyver" look me up please? Angus Macgyver? in the old series he didn't like his first name which why he used Macgyver.… Expand
  3. FleshWorld
    Oct 2, 2016
    1
    No, no no. I had to give up after the first episode. Has nothing going for it at all. I'm a little embarrassed that the lead actor took this gig. Oh boy.
  4. Qgal5kap
    Sep 23, 2016
    0
    Let's dumb it down, and fill it with **** CG. Hollywood 101 for creating half assed reboots. Maybe throw in some wooden acting, and a vapid main character, and you got yourself a product.
  5. Ripandread
    Sep 27, 2016
    0
    Here we go again with an attempt to revive a show from decades ago that falls flat on its face. It happened with "The Fugitive" and now we have MacGyver. What's next; an updated version of Ozzie and Harriet ? This is what happens when there is little creativity in TV programming.
  6. connor1982
    Oct 3, 2016
    2
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I give this show a 2 instead of 0 because it does have a good premise. The acting is weak, but could get better. The action, well, I guess I can say it is also weak. I've only seen the first two episodes and in those two episodes you have a bad guy on fast motorcycle getting passed by good guy truck that is off-road which proceeds to try to block the motorcycle by stopping in the road directly behind some strangely fallen tree branches and trunks that make a convenient ramp for it to jump the truck. I could go on but it is much the same. I don't expect this to go far.… Expand
  7. suzgeld
    Sep 24, 2016
    1
    Never saw the original series. The MacGyver character is pompous, arrogant and totally unwatchable. The original plot was watchable. However the Jack Dalton (George Eads) character was interesting, sincere and well acted. The two supporting female actors were good. I don't think I can watch another episode as long as the leading role is so poor.
  8. Russ253
    Sep 25, 2016
    0
    The clip for this show was bad, but I was going to watch it anyways. Turned it on and watched 10 seconds of it and turned the TV off. It was 007 in diapers, not my kind of show. Cancel it.
  9. Qldgamer
    Sep 25, 2016
    0
    The monologue style for this show made it so unwatchable it was not funny. They have taken a great show and trashed it completely. Bad acting terrible plot....
  10. zme-ul
    Sep 23, 2016
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I was rooting for the virus
    at some point you're started to wonder if all is just a parody of spy shows

    CBS should've taken the hint months ago when they released that teaser

    Burn Notice is a better MCGyver than MCGyver (2016)    … Expand
  11. MirageMyst
    Oct 8, 2016
    1
    Was hopeful as I loved the original series, was disappointed. Acting was sub-pr (even by the known seasoned actors), voice over dialog in background walking the audience through everything was completely unnecessary and annoying. Main character is completely unbelievable as a heartthrob with above average intelligence (well at least someone from my generations opinion), by telling us "how"Was hopeful as I loved the original series, was disappointed. Acting was sub-pr (even by the known seasoned actors), voice over dialog in background walking the audience through everything was completely unnecessary and annoying. Main character is completely unbelievable as a heartthrob with above average intelligence (well at least someone from my generations opinion), by telling us "how" every single thing was done and even having writing on the screen came across as patronizing and took away all the fun. Don't think the original MacGyver would be doing the James Bond impression either. Even if I didn't compare to the old, I wouldn't watch this tv show...deleted off the dvr!… Expand
  12. debspier
    Oct 21, 2016
    2
    The fun of the original show was it's unique character, MacGyver. The guy had an almost superhuman ability to use every day items to create high impact solutions. This new show is exactly like every other procedural on TV: 1. another team of folks in some special covert government agency (there must be a zillion of them) with no clear overall purpose 2. the team has the techie, theThe fun of the original show was it's unique character, MacGyver. The guy had an almost superhuman ability to use every day items to create high impact solutions. This new show is exactly like every other procedural on TV: 1. another team of folks in some special covert government agency (there must be a zillion of them) with no clear overall purpose 2. the team has the techie, the special ops guy, the understanding boss who lets them do whatever they want and MacGyver. Not sure what MacGyver is supposed to bring to the table here. His ability to transform every day items is limited, mundane and not used very often. The chases, explosions and systems tech take over the show. The plot and script of each episode could easily be interchanged with that of a dozen other shows . A major disappoinment. Watch reruns of the original show -it's more entertaining.… Expand
  13. Zack2981
    Oct 5, 2016
    0
    Terrible. Even as it's own thing and not comparing it to the original, this show is almost impossible to watch for anyone with a brain. But as a MacGyver fan, it is impossible. I made it through the pilot out of sheer will and got about 5 minutes into episode 2 before I had to tap out. This is any NCIS just with MacGyver in it. No stakes, everything is a joke, and there's no spirit of theTerrible. Even as it's own thing and not comparing it to the original, this show is almost impossible to watch for anyone with a brain. But as a MacGyver fan, it is impossible. I made it through the pilot out of sheer will and got about 5 minutes into episode 2 before I had to tap out. This is any NCIS just with MacGyver in it. No stakes, everything is a joke, and there's no spirit of the original. Hated it.… Expand
  14. jurrabi
    Oct 11, 2016
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. 60 seconds took them to kill 3 people in the new MacGyver series reboot? remake? resell?...

    Are you serious? MacGyver? The man that never touched a gun? And I know he doesn't kill them, but he condones it with his line "-Jack?"

    Look, you can do whatever you want. You want to do a series about a smart guy with a team that kills people? Perfect! But please, don't call it MacGyver!!

    If it was called any other thing I might have watched it, but with a MacGyver tag you need to reach some level and keep some standards... All you have proven is that you don't understand MacGyver at all.

    60 seconds... that's all the attention you got from me. Congratulations.    … Expand
  15. thebestoftimes
    Oct 3, 2016
    0
    this remake of the great Richard dean Anderson tv classic is nothing more than an adventure television show without masking tape, the performances are terrible, the story is wooden, the teleplay is a big disaster, the cgi is pathetic and the episodes are so stupid it makes you wanna scream, please avoid this remake at all costs

    the worst tv of the year.
  16. Bmanne
    Oct 29, 2016
    2
    Some reooted shows work and some don't, this does not. To capture the greatness of the original, a new story line is needed, not just rehash the old ones.
  17. TheTaL1esT
    Nov 14, 2016
    0
    This is an insult to the original. The writing is so bad you have to wonder if they want it to fail. The puzzles are under researched and forced. I'm not saying the original was always scientifically accurate but where at least interesting and fit into the story as a spur of the moment task. That first episode could of been split into three or four with an actual deep story with suspence.
  18. Mitchzap65
    Sep 26, 2016
    1
    Honestly, screw this reboot. Even the original show practically died about half-way through, why would anyone think that a reboot was what the MacGyver needed? I cannot say for sure.
  19. iwishyouwereold
    Sep 24, 2016
    0
    In all honesty, this was painful to watch....But on the other hand if you were born in the early 2000´s you might actually enjoy this big bag of delightfulness.
  20. webshultz
    Dec 19, 2016
    0
    This is by far the weakest acted, poorest plotted unrealistic program on Television. It really sucks and is a big disappointment to those of us who remember the original MacGyver. Or any other action/drama series that has ever been on the Tube....I recommend it be cancelled.
  21. sumsupporter
    Dec 17, 2016
    0
    mcgyver? more like mc-gay-ver. the way the way this show is scripted is extremely poor its a low budget show written all over it. and more like a stupid comedy cartoon where everything lead does is shown in a cartoon bubble followed by a light bulb over the dudes head its that terrible! I used to love watching original series and the cast it got me started on sg1 and the entire stargatemcgyver? more like mc-gay-ver. the way the way this show is scripted is extremely poor its a low budget show written all over it. and more like a stupid comedy cartoon where everything lead does is shown in a cartoon bubble followed by a light bulb over the dudes head its that terrible! I used to love watching original series and the cast it got me started on sg1 and the entire stargate series you cannot just replace it and have it be mcgyver. at least rename this piece of cr@p so it would not taint the name of the original show.… Expand
  22. t4mo
    Jan 14, 2017
    0
    I couldn't watch the whole trailer without leaving a nasty taste in my mouth

    150char.......................................................................................
  23. user133
    Jul 22, 2017
    0
    There is only one MacGyver and that is Richard Dean Anderson, not some wannabe with no likeable characteristics whatsoever. Painfull to watch!
    Please cancel this travesty already to give room for other tv shows!
  24. GeoThermal
    Jan 12, 2018
    1
    This show strains credulity with every episode, from ridiculous scenarios to even more ridiculous resolutions. I like good fantasy as much as the next guy, but this is not good fantasy. It's ludicrous.
  25. illidanisdead
    Jan 23, 2019
    0
    I don't understand how you can watch this, the original macgyver wasn't like a kid who just got out of high school. He was a grown man and he was helping an agency out etc. The new Macgyver looks like a kid who barely finished high school and we are supposed to believe he even served in the military. Except for Jack the team is surrounded with a bunch of other kids, a reformed hacker. HisI don't understand how you can watch this, the original macgyver wasn't like a kid who just got out of high school. He was a grown man and he was helping an agency out etc. The new Macgyver looks like a kid who barely finished high school and we are supposed to believe he even served in the military. Except for Jack the team is surrounded with a bunch of other kids, a reformed hacker. His best friend who just happens to have skills that can help them. I get that this is a fictional show but couldn't they at least make the show believable. It feels like this show is trying to show how diverse the cast is, rather than capture the essence of Macgyver, mind you he never had a team or joined an agency. I went through 3 seasons hoping that some one on the writing team would wake up from the coma they have been suffering from to write this drivel. The CGI effects are fake as hell to add to the bad writing, than the bad acting. The jokes that make you cringe.... they should change the name of the show from Macgyver to team of kids who are playing spies.… Expand
  26. CaspianRoach
    Feb 20, 2020
    1
    This show is insane. It's like watching a parody of the 'generic midday action TV series', except they don't play it for laughs, but expect you to take it seriously. The plots and problem solutions are asinine and insanely cheesy and the pilot episode managed to contain itself for 30 seconds before reducing a main female character to a sex object and then proceeded to marvel at itsThis show is insane. It's like watching a parody of the 'generic midday action TV series', except they don't play it for laughs, but expect you to take it seriously. The plots and problem solutions are asinine and insanely cheesy and the pilot episode managed to contain itself for 30 seconds before reducing a main female character to a sex object and then proceeded to marvel at its ingenuinity by making her a damsel in distress. I honestly had to double check when was this made as this attitude feels like something from the 80s. And it's not like the other characters are any better, they feel like cheap comic book characters without a shred of a unique personality.

    It's probably worth to watch an episode or two just to witness the audacity of this show. I guarantee you'll be laughing at the stupidity of it all and you won't believe the character work. I swear I said 'they did what?' watching the pilot episode at least three times in regards to the most blatant genericness of the characters.

    You can probably build this show in full by combining TvTropes pages together without adding a single original thing, that's how generic it is.

    Edit: After watching the whole first season, I would like to add that as soon as you encounter an area in that show you know something about, you realise that this is not how ANY of this works. It's like the writers have used zero consultants and just **** their way through it all. You'll be constantly astonished at the stupidity of the things happening on screen. Computer science, chemistry, even basic physics all take a break because a writer needed something to happen. And it doesn't just stop at the sciences. The people depicted in the show also behave like complete morons unable to do their jobs because the writers couldn't figure out a different way to move the plot forward.

    You should only really be watching this show as a screen filler, something playing in a background to mildly distract you from a monotone task. It doesn't deserve your full attention.    … Expand

Awards & Rankings

23
#23 Most Discussed TV Season of 2016
70
#70 Most Shared TV Season of 2016

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
38

Generally unfavorable reviews - based on 26 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 26
  2. Mixed: 11 out of 26
  3. Negative: 13 out of 26
  1. We Got This Covered
    Reviewed by: Bernard Boo
    Sep 26, 2016
    30
    The cues are clunky and don’t add much insight into the mind of our hero, and the sense of suspense the original was known for (typically involving an explosive of some sort) is all but missing here, mostly due to the fact that the show insists on maintaining a zippy pace at all times. This is a major issue, but the show’s woes don’t end there. The more critical question of cast chemistry is ultimately what sinks the ill-conceived reboot, with Till struggling to find an easy rapport with his onscreen partners.
    Read full review
  2. St. Louis Post-Dispatch
    Reviewed by: Gail Pennington
    Sep 23, 2016
    50
    MacGyver isn't going to set prime time on fire. But it's watchable enough, and it seems like a good Friday night fit with CBS' "Hawaii Five-0" and "Blue Bloods."
    Read full review
  3. The Wrap
    Reviewed by: Mark Peikert
    Sep 23, 2016
    30
    Comfort food television is a necessary and worthwhile product, but MacGyver is so bland it’s not even fun for a Friday night in.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »