WB | The WB | Netflix | Release Date: October 5, 2000
CRITIC SCORE DISTRIBUTION
78
METASCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 55 Critic Reviews
Positive:
47
Mixed:
7
Negative:
1
60
VarietyLaura FriesJun 10, 2013
Season 1 Review: Works a little too hard to be everything to everyone. However, beyond the carefully calculated diversity of the pilot lies a pleasant and heartwarming series that may bridge the generation gap at the WB. It's still a chick show, but at least Gilmore Girls could attract women well past the N' Sync phase. [4 Oct 2000, p.7]
60
Arizona RepublicBill GoodykoontzJun 6, 2013
Season 1 Review: Gilmore Girls tries to be edgy, but at its core it's -- there's just noother word -- sweet. It's nothing groundbreaking. [5 Oct 2000, p.1E]
50
Washington PostMegan RosenfieldJun 10, 2013
Season 1 Review: One of those "almost" shows--almost funny, almost interesting and almost family-friendly. There is potential here, particularly in the mother-daughter relationship between 32-year-old Lorelai (Lauren Graham) and 16-year-old Rory (Alexis Bledel), who could develop a real bond if they'd stop zinging one-liners for a few minutes. And if they can't stop the quips, maybe they could just speak more slowly so the audience can understand what they're saying. [5 Oct 2000, p.C07]
50
Boston HeraldMonica CollinsJun 6, 2013
Season 1 Review: The TV mom has changed - from out-of-touch authority figure to giggling girlfriend. This WB series attempts to depict a thoroughly modern single parent-child relationship. Yet, there's a sense this type of chumminess could only happen on TV. [5 Oct 2000, p.48]