CSI: Cyber

:

Season 1
  • Network: CBS
  • Series Premiere Date: Oct 9, 2013
Season #: 2, 1
User Score
3.5

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 111 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 28 out of 111
  2. Mixed: 18 out of 111
  3. Negative: 65 out of 111
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Stream On
Buy on
Stream On

Review this tv show

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

User Reviews

view
per page
  1. TomsZ
    Mar 7, 2015
    1
    This show has more cheese in it than Switzerland, the one liners were just horrendous, even worse than mr. Caine in his best moments. All in all this is a total letdown this far, hopefully the show gets better with time, otherwise this could be the 1st CSI series that airs for one season.
  2. joef123
    Mar 5, 2015
    0
    Patricia Arquette is going from winning an well deserved Oscar in one of the greatest films of the 21st century, Boyhood, to this piece of dog sh*t. Its just sad
  3. nofilter23
    Mar 14, 2015
    1
    Yes, the show is filled with the usual CSI cliches that everyone is all too familiar with. Most of us can tolerate the CSI archetypes, to an extent. The no-nonsense gun-wielding officer, the level-headed special agent with an eye for persons of ill-intent, are all things I can put up in crime drama. But when the show clearly pulls characters from other tv show formats, the writers haveYes, the show is filled with the usual CSI cliches that everyone is all too familiar with. Most of us can tolerate the CSI archetypes, to an extent. The no-nonsense gun-wielding officer, the level-headed special agent with an eye for persons of ill-intent, are all things I can put up in crime drama. But when the show clearly pulls characters from other tv show formats, the writers have to find a way to make it work without losing the integrity of the show. Bow Wow's character plays the former misfit-hacker struggling to turn over a new leaf and help the FBI(White Collar, Breakout Kings). Hayley Kiyoko plays the quirky fun-dressing assistant on the periphery of each episodes plot development and seems to lack purpose or import on the show. Then of course, the over-weight computer nerd, in all of his quick witted humor and sarcasm. The most glaring problem of all is that the script lacks originality. The show opens with a spoken introduction by the main character, Avery Ryan, that sounds borrowed from a Vigilante Cartoon explaining why he protects his city, which immediately establishes a precedent of low expectations for creativity. There was little thought put into this script. The challenge of any new series is going about revealing pieces of the past(essential to the characters and plot) in a clever and unexpected way. The writers of this show did not step up to the challenge. Important information just seems to be thrown throughout the script without being connected to the plot. The dialogue is not believable and sounds more punch line oriented. The actors aren't being given much to work with and Bow Wow's characters exposed that more than anyone else. The dialogue often times feels unnatural, forced, and out of context. I doubt if this show will be renewed for another season.… Expand
  4. TNBIKETOM
    Mar 25, 2015
    0
    I have worked in IT for 40 years and have a special interest in IT security. Being an avid fan for the NCSI series, I had high hopes for CSI-Cyber, but no matter how hard I try, I can't get into this program. The background music is so loud it becomes painful if I try to understand the shallow and disconnected dialogue. For someone involved in cyber security, the plots in these show makeI have worked in IT for 40 years and have a special interest in IT security. Being an avid fan for the NCSI series, I had high hopes for CSI-Cyber, but no matter how hard I try, I can't get into this program. The background music is so loud it becomes painful if I try to understand the shallow and disconnected dialogue. For someone involved in cyber security, the plots in these show make no sense. The producers in my favorite NCSI have done an exceptional job in character development. I don't expected to be able to tolerate this program long enough to warm up to the wooden characters in CSI-Cyber. I am so disappointed in what I had hoped would have been a very insightful look and a major problem for anyone who works with the Internet.… Expand
  5. Cheflyn717
    Mar 25, 2015
    2
    I like most of the CSI shows and I really was excited for this one too, unfortunately I'm not impressed. Bad acting, terrible dialogue and the casting of this team is off. Not worth watching!
  6. hb1209
    Mar 8, 2015
    0
    they should return the series "stalker" to be honest.
    this is somehow the most unrealistic, preposterous and really the worst of the CSI shows. poor writing, poor editiong, poor acting, this show should be really quick canceled
  7. Qldgamer
    Mar 21, 2015
    2
    This sow is a bland mixture of the same thing we have seen many times before, but done worse. The stereo-types like the overweight computer guy, and the boss with a dark background.

    The cyber seems to be just a weak plot point to have a car chase or a gun fight. No real hacking skills used. Sure they have some cyber ideas but on the whole not well used. This show has been made before    This sow is a bland mixture of the same thing we have seen many times before, but done worse. The stereo-types like the overweight computer guy, and the boss with a dark background.

    The cyber seems to be just a weak plot point to have a car chase or a gun fight. No real hacking skills used. Sure they have some cyber ideas but on the whole not well used.

    This show has been made before and this is a bad version of those shows.    … Expand
  8. GoodTimes
    Mar 26, 2015
    1
    Watched second show and then deleted the first one that was on DVR; then deleted DVR future recordings. Frankly the plot and program are totally BORING! Arquette and cast just don't cut it and instead of team seem like dispirate entities. I would have given it a big ZERO but chose a rating of ONE simply because of the main star. I predict that this show will disappear after initial showsWatched second show and then deleted the first one that was on DVR; then deleted DVR future recordings. Frankly the plot and program are totally BORING! Arquette and cast just don't cut it and instead of team seem like dispirate entities. I would have given it a big ZERO but chose a rating of ONE simply because of the main star. I predict that this show will disappear after initial shows have been run.… Expand
  9. riain
    Apr 8, 2015
    0
    Had high hopes.

    For a show with some pretty good actors it falls pretty much flat on it's face stereotypes everywhere ahoy!, completely illogical to the point you feel dumber for watching, irritating zooming, a show with My name is Avery Ryan and here some stuff that happen which you heard last week and the week before and the week before blah now watch the set up for the episode    Had high hopes.

    For a show with some pretty good actors it falls pretty much flat on it's face stereotypes everywhere ahoy!, completely illogical to the point you feel dumber for watching, irritating zooming, a show with My name is Avery Ryan and here some stuff that happen which you heard last week and the week before and the week before blah now watch the set up for the episode followed by another intro to the CSI show with whole cast (I know their trying to sell Patricia Arquette who is great but it got old after the second time), a main character who can apparently hack a car with an app and then needs the term trojan horse explained (by of course the text book fat computer guy using a sandwich) to her seriously either she is tech savvy or she isn't can't have it both ways, a black hat hacker who is black just so you won't forget it..... I could go on and on really and picking apart what's aired so but it's just not worth and I would easily run out of space which is sad as I was big into CSI.

    I might watch two more if that but probably won't last considering I'm big into computing and this show just makes my head hurt as if the writers just did a quick internet search as research and boom... waffles.    … Expand
  10. aislemaiden
    Apr 18, 2015
    1
    I don't like Patricia Arquette in this role. She's monotone, unemotional and detached. The show needs a few more engaged feature characters and better writers. The scripts are really poor. Makes you wonder why CSI: NY was canceled.
  11. bobcratchett
    Apr 22, 2015
    0
    wooden characters, lame computer knowledge, erratic plot continuity = crappy attempt at a subject they know little about. Patricia Arquette was terrible in The Medium and she doesn't' t disappoint an anticipated terrible characterization again.
  12. bknabe
    Apr 5, 2015
    2
    I've watched every episode so far and intend to watch until it is cancelled - not because it is good, but because it is so bad. The writing takes the worst elements of crime drama and mixes it with bad 'cyber' cliches. The acting is so far below what even the obscure members of the cast are capable of it's sad. Unless they're being directed to act that way, in which case it's disgusting.I've watched every episode so far and intend to watch until it is cancelled - not because it is good, but because it is so bad. The writing takes the worst elements of crime drama and mixes it with bad 'cyber' cliches. The acting is so far below what even the obscure members of the cast are capable of it's sad. Unless they're being directed to act that way, in which case it's disgusting. While some of the characters seem to be getting better, you still have the writing, which is bad. I think Arquette's character is supposed to come off as cool and logical, but she actually comes across as cold and emotionless. Maybe even a little inhuman.

    The shows one virtue is that is so ripe for parody, lampoon, and the MST3K treatment.    … Expand
  13. Phoenixxl
    Apr 7, 2015
    4
    Problem is , nobody in Hollywood knows which end of a ssh client is the sharp end.
    In 1980's Whiz Kids computers could be portrayed as translating hieroglyphics using a joystick and a curling iron. In the nineties security systems got cracked by the main character typing very fast.
    This is 2015 , we know how **** works, Hollywood, you need to up your game. 8 for wanting to make    Problem is , nobody in Hollywood knows which end of a ssh client is the sharp end.
    In 1980's Whiz Kids computers could be portrayed as translating hieroglyphics using a joystick and a curling iron. In the nineties security systems got cracked by the main character typing very fast.
    This is 2015 , we know how **** works, Hollywood, you need to up your game.

    8 for wanting to make something computercentric 0 for execution makes a 4/10.    … Expand
  14. racecarsue
    Apr 4, 2015
    3
    Not thrilled. I just haven't been able to get into it yet. I love Patricia Arquette, watched Medium all the time. The characters are evolving, the plots aren't for me yet.
  15. jitsuryoku
    Mar 12, 2015
    3
    Terrible. Third-rate writing and a lousy cast with the exception of Ms Arquette. No originality whatsoever. CBS should either completely overhaul it or kill it.
  16. Sor-El
    Mar 21, 2015
    3
    This spin-off of CSI really had potential, but falls short to deliver.
    Mainly because of the cast choice.
    Gonna keep watching it, unless it starts to interfere with my other series. Then I'll drop it.
  17. JCat
    May 13, 2015
    0
    I like Patrica Arquette, but this is beyond bad. It uses all types of stereotype, been there/done that characters and one liners that are meant to explain modern tech to an audience which makes it even more unrealistic. Please! Super bad, cringe inducing scripts. If you know even a bit about technology, you'll throw up in your mouth. Oh, and tonight's episode (May 12th 2015), was aboutI like Patrica Arquette, but this is beyond bad. It uses all types of stereotype, been there/done that characters and one liners that are meant to explain modern tech to an audience which makes it even more unrealistic. Please! Super bad, cringe inducing scripts. If you know even a bit about technology, you'll throw up in your mouth. Oh, and tonight's episode (May 12th 2015), was about gamers, By the end of show, they solved their crime and with a sigh of relief, said something to the effect of video games are best left to the kids. What is this 1982? Talk about writers being clueless d_ouches.… Expand
  18. Darkling
    Apr 8, 2015
    5
    It's like a CSI comedy series the laughable dialogues and half truths make it entertaining to watch.
    The Word Cyber already shows that it is was written and/or greenlighted by people that have no clue about the Web 3.0
  19. shavenwookie
    Sep 29, 2015
    1
    This is by far the best worst show on television. It is very rare that a show manages to mess everything up acting, writing directing this is the Trolls 2 of television series.
  20. Slanegx
    Mar 12, 2015
    4
    This so...frozen.An empty ,hollow show with not much to offer,an over played format ,like ncis or criminal minds which after the first two season each makes you not to care about its characters. In this show i don't care from the start if they get hit by a bus with puppies in it.Nostolgia is the feeling I got from this show,for Grissom and his Scooby gang ,characters which I cared aboutThis so...frozen.An empty ,hollow show with not much to offer,an over played format ,like ncis or criminal minds which after the first two season each makes you not to care about its characters. In this show i don't care from the start if they get hit by a bus with puppies in it.Nostolgia is the feeling I got from this show,for Grissom and his Scooby gang ,characters which I cared about and where intresting. I also expected more from Arquette I thought she would give a depth or a complex character or something that would remind you why she got an Oscar.This show it's like a frozen pizza,if you like pizza you ' ll try it but doesn't mean you ll like it.This show is an other way to squizze a dead franscise.We should call the police cause this body is getting cold.… Expand
  21. jcreimer
    Apr 11, 2015
    4
    My 4 rating for this show is sort of a "benefit of a doubt" sort of thing. I wanted to like this show, since I enjoyed the other CSI shows. However, the two lead characters, Patricia Arquette and James VdB, do nothing for me and there doesn't seem to be any real chemistry between the team members as a group. Other series have made character changes during the formative seasons to refineMy 4 rating for this show is sort of a "benefit of a doubt" sort of thing. I wanted to like this show, since I enjoyed the other CSI shows. However, the two lead characters, Patricia Arquette and James VdB, do nothing for me and there doesn't seem to be any real chemistry between the team members as a group. Other series have made character changes during the formative seasons to refine the team when necessary. Hopefully, this series will do so also if it happens to make it to a second season. I would suggest a new female lead and Eddie Cahill in lieu of James VdB for openers. In the two-entry contest of new action/thrillers of this season, CSI: Cyber finishes a slow third behind NCIS: New Orleans.… Expand
  22. Desert_Rat
    May 31, 2015
    2
    I liked the original CSI in Vegas and I hope it isn't gone forever. I liked CSI: NY but it's long gone now. I had hopes for this one but I just can't get into it. The characters never seem to gel. They seem like a dysfunctional work group. Arquette's character seems like she's more interested in herself than building her team. She's grouchy but she's no Jethro Gibbs. If I were part ofI liked the original CSI in Vegas and I hope it isn't gone forever. I liked CSI: NY but it's long gone now. I had hopes for this one but I just can't get into it. The characters never seem to gel. They seem like a dysfunctional work group. Arquette's character seems like she's more interested in herself than building her team. She's grouchy but she's no Jethro Gibbs. If I were part of their team I'd be looking for a way to transfer out. Fortunately all I need to do is pick up the remote.… Expand
  23. superdave61
    May 13, 2015
    1
    I can't believe the writers are so lame, to think that public Joe is so stupid, to fall for such drivel.
    Yes it's true a good hacker can cause alot of mayhem, but honestly, the melodrama that follows the story, is right up there with a 70's soap opera.
    I've watched this show from the beginning, waiting for something interesting, something I can sink my teeth into, but each episode leaves    I can't believe the writers are so lame, to think that public Joe is so stupid, to fall for such drivel.
    Yes it's true a good hacker can cause alot of mayhem, but honestly, the melodrama that follows the story, is right up there with a 70's soap opera.
    I've watched this show from the beginning, waiting for something interesting, something I can sink my teeth into, but each episode leaves me more disappointed, then the last.
    Good concept, terrible writing.    … Expand
  24. boneshaker34
    May 14, 2015
    5
    How can a crime be committed in another state & CSI Cyber team arrives on the seen at the same time as the local authorities and first responders? Then they discover criminal activity in another state, still have time to get to the home base in DC and they arrive in the next state to make the arrest again before local authorities... Doesn't this well funded agency have lab techs? Why areHow can a crime be committed in another state & CSI Cyber team arrives on the seen at the same time as the local authorities and first responders? Then they discover criminal activity in another state, still have time to get to the home base in DC and they arrive in the next state to make the arrest again before local authorities... Doesn't this well funded agency have lab techs? Why are they always doing their own lab work including fingerprinting. How do all their arch enemies live in DC. Why is it suppose to be so amazing when The CSI leads asks a question, the person wipes both hands across their face and the camera zooms in as if she is seeing some amazing clue that no one else can see. Why does their equipment get hacked or corrupted so easily? When do they sleep, because they work night and day? Why is it that every time one of them needs help from the team, they go off the grid but supposedly leave some minuscule clue that for some reason people that have only known them a short while are able to figure out. This could be a good show, just strip away some of the corny cyber explanations and definitions, more crime less soap opera and less personal attachments to the crimes especially the ones where one of them has a best friend or relative that is wrongly accused.… Expand
  25. vjjr
    May 24, 2015
    3
    Probably the runt of the litter. This program has little of the "charms" of a procedural and all of its faults. The dialogue is chock full of meaningless acronyms that are at times confounding. Patricia Arquette does her best to renounce her recent Oscar by seeming to be lost in the wrong "medium"--the acting is banal at best. Oh well, this might save us from CSI Podunk!
  26. LucilleS
    May 27, 2015
    0
    Terrible, Terrible. Hope it is canceled next season. Give us something worth watching. The scripts, acting, and total show is one of the worst. In hopes that the program would get better I have tried to watch it but it has not improved at all. There has to be better programs available to replace this loser.
  27. awaba
    Jul 2, 2015
    0
    Arquette can't act, she never could. The show is misleading in it's display and use of 'technology' at best and pure drivel at worst. Don't believe everything you see on TV people.
  28. meadhbh
    Mar 5, 2015
    1
    The over-acting and ridiculous lines throughout the entire program were just too much. I almost turned it off within the first five minutes. I loved the other CSI programs until the CSI personnel started carrying guns and doing the cops' jobs, and solving the cases and arresting the criminals, instead of giving the cops the evidence so they (the cops) could solve the cases and arrest theThe over-acting and ridiculous lines throughout the entire program were just too much. I almost turned it off within the first five minutes. I loved the other CSI programs until the CSI personnel started carrying guns and doing the cops' jobs, and solving the cases and arresting the criminals, instead of giving the cops the evidence so they (the cops) could solve the cases and arrest the criminals. It just became too preposterous. Then I stopped watching. I didn't see much to redeem this new CSI program. I'm going to watch the next episode to see if it's any better, but my first instinct is that its a poorly done show.… Expand
  29. ThinBlueLine
    Mar 5, 2015
    1
    This is somehow the most unrealistic and preposterous of the CSI shows, which had already held that title compared to the rest of TV. It is not at all what the cyber crime division of the FBI does or how they do it. By that I mean it's even more unrealistic than the idiotic other CSI shows where the lab techs carry guns guns and interview and arrest people. It is some of the worst actingThis is somehow the most unrealistic and preposterous of the CSI shows, which had already held that title compared to the rest of TV. It is not at all what the cyber crime division of the FBI does or how they do it. By that I mean it's even more unrealistic than the idiotic other CSI shows where the lab techs carry guns guns and interview and arrest people. It is some of the worst acting I've seen in a major TV show, and the cinematography is unbelievably stupid. It's like a kindergartener who just figured out how to use slow motion made this show, as that's how half of it is filmed. The special effects are straight up stupid, like the visualizations of computer code. The characters of course have lines so cheesy that if the previous stuff didn't already make it unwatchable the dialogue would, and they have to talk out loud through ever step of their thinking so the lowest common denominator of the world's population that watches this show can understand. The only way I could sit through the whole first episode was to think of it as a parody, and I still want to sue the producers for my 45 minutes back. How anyone could ever watch this show is beyond me. It should be cancelled not to mention prime time on a huge network.… Expand
  30. PointGeorge
    Mar 6, 2015
    0
    Painful to watch. A nanny cam as a basis to start a cyber investigation? Took what could be a great concept and brought it down to the tripe level. From the introductory, totally schizophrenic introduction it was awful. After seeing a terrible introductin I turned it off after 10 minutes, something I have never done with a new series
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

28
#28 Most Discussed TV Season of 2015

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
45

Mixed or average reviews - based on 23 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 3 out of 23
  2. Mixed: 14 out of 23
  3. Negative: 6 out of 23
  1. Newark Star-Ledger
    Reviewed by: Vicki Hyman
    Mar 4, 2015
    58
    CSI: Cyber is perfectly serviceable television, with nothing distracting--David Caruso dramatically interrupting his own cheesy ripostes to don his sunglasses, say--to take you out of the story, but not a whole lot to keep you breathless for another.
    Read full review
  2. New York Magazine (Vulture)
    Reviewed by: Margaret Lyons
    Mar 4, 2015
    20
    While CSI: Cyber is functional, it's also a useless chore. I have no idea what you could get out of CSI: Cyber that you couldn't get out of Scorpion.
    Read full review
  3. St. Louis Post-Dispatch
    Reviewed by: Gail Pennington
    Mar 4, 2015
    37
    The dialogue Arquette is forced to deliver is the worst thing.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »