• Network: Netflix
  • Series Premiere Date: Dec 25, 2020
Season #: 4, 3, 2, 1
Metascore
75

Generally favorable reviews - based on 34 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 26 out of 34
  2. Negative: 0 out of 34

Critic Reviews

  1. Reviewed by: Lucy Mangan
    Jan 30, 2026
    60
    Show every sign of having watched one too many episodes of Downton Abbey. ... I felt by the end of the first episode it had delighted me with its presence long enough, and yet … and yet … Was there not, after all, room for just one more? And, perhaps, another after that?
  2. Reviewed by: Doreen St. Félix
    Jan 4, 2021
    60
    My empty, end-of-the-year brain was well served by the burlesque of selfish viscounts, conniving ladies of the house, and enterprising modistes. Less pleasurable were certain attempts at seriousness. ... The grafting of contemporary politics onto the period piece feels extraneous and vague. Maybe this interracial-love fetish would have jelled better in the Obama era.
  3. Reviewed by: Brian Lowry
    Jan 2, 2021
    60
    As opening bids go, however, Bridgerton plays a weak hand, turning Julia Quinn's novels about a 19th-century London family into a handsome but tedious snooze -- think "Masterpiece Theater," only with more sex and nudity.
  4. Reviewed by: Candice Frederick
    Dec 21, 2020
    60
    Van Dusen and his team seem to bite off more than they can chew by giving each of their characters, brought to life by a charming cast, a hefty storyline that in some cases is flayed by the end of the season. That's compounded by its melodrama, which may attract those with a specific palate for this kind of fare, like Downton Abbey and The Crown, even with its flaws, but others may not be able to get past its foibles to enjoy the operatic escapades. Bridgerton is ultimately extravagantly decent.
  5. Reviewed by: Roxana Hadadi
    Dec 24, 2020
    50
    The result is an inconsistently paced effort that ultimately reveals itself as an entirely predictable “Pride and Prejudice” retread. “Bridgerton” is amusing enough and will scratch a certain thirsty itch, but its themes about love, marriage, and class aren’t quite as progressive as it would like to think.
  6. Reviewed by: Judy Berman
    Dec 21, 2020
    50
    It’s a fun show, for a while at least; the escapism quotient is high, especially at the end of a year without parties or gowns or skin-to-skin contact between people who don’t already share a bathroom. And it’s exciting to see Shondaland, which spent so many years chronicling the adventures of 21st-century professional superwomen, play around in a genre where feminist empowerment is harder to come by. If only the writing matched the production values.
  7. Reviewed by: Bruce Miller
    Dec 21, 2020
    50
    Considering the money that must have been spent on it, “Bridgerton” should be better. It has all the trappings of a 1980s network miniseries but none of its sizzle. More humor -- and an appearance by Andrews -- would help immensely.
  8. Reviewed by: Aja Romano
    Jan 12, 2021
    40
    Instead of filling that opulent, 19th-century setting with true passion and heart, the show comes off like many of the aristocrats it’s skewering: soulless and vapid.
User Score
5.7

Mixed or average reviews- based on 121 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 66 out of 121
  2. Negative: 48 out of 121
  1. Dec 26, 2020
    3
    This poorly written Netflix original laughs in the face of historical accuracy and managed the neat trick of simultaneously boring andThis poorly written Netflix original laughs in the face of historical accuracy and managed the neat trick of simultaneously boring and disturbing me. - 3 stars Full Review »
  2. Dec 29, 2020
    2
    Julia Quinn is a fantastic author who did a fantastic job with her novels. I own all of the Brigertons novels, and love how historicallyJulia Quinn is a fantastic author who did a fantastic job with her novels. I own all of the Brigertons novels, and love how historically accurate they are with well developed characters who challenged the societal and gender norms of the day. (1805ish) I was really taken back when the royalty was black but thought "well maybe they were just the best actors and actresses for the job?" Not historically accurate but hey whatever its Hollywood. Then they had to go and make it political. I hate that they destroyed her work, if it was named something else or loosely based on her ideas then it would be a fantastic work (if it was not trying to make a political statement) but when you take an authors work, her name, her ideas and characters you don't change it to your own idea and political arguments and call it the same thing. Full Review »
  3. Dec 27, 2020
    0
    As expected, its garbage. So many good 'critic' reviews is because of the 'color blind' casting I guess. Metacritic says its like "DowntonAs expected, its garbage. So many good 'critic' reviews is because of the 'color blind' casting I guess. Metacritic says its like "Downton Abbey...with more sex". Shows like Downton Abbey did just fine without the sex. Full Review »