Just a competent exploratory shooter spoiled by interaction with the pad. [Issue#38, p.115]

A beautiful game that's let down by its clunky mechanics and frustrating AI quirks. [Issue#119, p.76]

If you're under ten, go ahead and buy this. You'll probably only feel slightly disappointed at worst. [Issue#79, p.82]

Just make sure you turn the bloody sound off. [Issue#20, p.116]

This kind of purity is exactly what's been missing from the series for years. [Issue#89,p.77]

One to heartily recommend. [Issue#54, p.104]

A laggy mess online. [Issue#23, p.96]

A strange one, this. Fun to play with friends for a while, but the questions range from interesting to just plain stupid, and this really should be DLC. That’s what DLC is for!

The steep ramping of difficulty makes for a game that never feels as effortlessly addictive as titles like Angry Birds. [Issue#78, p.101]

Download it, but keep your expectations somewhat calm. [Issue#78, p.100]

Those looking to play solo should probably look elsewhere. [Issue#67, p.87]

The same retro person, crying in the corner, wishing it was more popular and that more people would talk to it. [Issue#5, p.120]

Too Human is by no means a bad videogame, it’s just very repetitive and highly disappointing. With ten years development time, you’d think it would be a bit more impressive than this.

A smart, stylish attempt at bringing platform puzzling back to the fore, regrettably let down by a physics engine that doesn’t want to co-operate.

It's just grand. [Issue#52, p.105]

Better suited to nostalgic gamers than newcomers. [Issue#115, p.84]

The weak pseudo-jazz music would embarrass a grot movie director, but apart from that, this is good stuff. [Issue#5, p.120]

A rare breed of game that anyone can pick up and play. [Issue#6, p.120]

A game that sucked in 1982 and amazingly, sucks even more in 2006. [Issue 14, p.116]

Good enough to recommend to fans of gore, swords, hip-hop, anime, martial arts and, of course, Afro Samurai, but too lightweight and insubstantial to recommend to everyone. [Issue#44, p.76]

We’ve seen it all before; the bones of the typical Saints Row’s design are creaking under the desire for new experiences.

It's a novel concept but lack of control variation, plus the obvious graphical deficiencies, make it a dulled thrill. [Issue#36, p.114]

Button mashing is boring. [Issue#20, p.93]

Unline its predecessor Ms. Pac-Man presents a decent challenge, everything plays at a far nippier pace. [Issue 17, p.116]

A decent collection with a few standout games. [Issue#85, p.93]

This is an unexpected game. Everything points to the fact that by all accounts it should be awful. Licenses like this hardly ever work, but amazingly it comes off feeling like a fun, throwaway shooter with a workable shooting mechanic and some quite enjoyable moments that, while strictly not very Bond in nature, make the game well worth a look if you’re either a Bond fan or even just enjoy a good shooter.

Has so many excellent little twists on poker that it adds a whole new level of fun on top of the tactics the game already employs. [Issue#47, p.101]

It's a sad indictment of the brand that the most important point to be made here is that Dynasty Warriors Gundam 3 isn't a sloppy shambles, but there you go. [Issue#75, p.79]