Washington Post's Scores

For 11,478 reviews, this publication has graded:
  • 46% higher than the average critic
  • 2% same as the average critic
  • 52% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 5.4 points lower than other critics. (0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 60
Highest review score: 100 Oppenheimer
Lowest review score: 0 Dolittle
Score distribution:
11478 movie reviews
  1. Lacks the spirit of the previous two, and makes all those jokes about hos and even more unmentionable subjects seem like mere splashing around in the muck.
  2. Simple without being slight, and profoundly moving without dipping into mawkishness.
  3. The film is a testament to art, life and survival like the similar but superior "Buena Vista Social Club."
  4. It's just a gimmick, right down to its Washington release date.
  5. Here, common sense flies out the window, along with the hail of bullets.
  6. May be morally tangled, pessimistic, lurid and foreboding, but it's also humanistic.
  7. Doesn't connect with its audience in the one place that matters most: the heart.
  8. Big, dull and empty -- nobody associated with this production appears to have thought hard about storytelling.
  9. Too infuriatingly quirky and taken with its own style to get down to telling a story.
  10. The film would be insufferable if it weren't for the total sincerity and commitment of its players.
  11. The movie has the sense of being embalmed, or pickled. With its stilted dialogue not quite kitschy enough to be funny and not quite authentic enough to be realistic, the whole movie feels as if it's taking place in formaldehyde.
  12. There's no doubt that Eminem has the talent and presence of a star. It's just a shame that the filmmakers didn't capture his power with mad skillz of their own.
  13. A passionate film buff's valentine to the two directors he loves most: Alfred Hitchcock and Brian De Palma. The film that this worship has inspired is pretty amusing when the director apes Hitchcock, and pretty awful when he apes himself.
  14. Boasts the purest of Disney raptures: It unites the generations, rather than driving them apart.
  15. It resides in that cinematic middle ground of not-bad, not-great, just okay.
  16. Manages to make sex look like no fun at all.
  17. Maybe Thomas Wolfe was right: You can't go home again
  18. Allen, who's a natural charmer, seems to be at half-strength here.
  19. Nothing is real, but at the same time, nothing is fake. Nothing is, period. You don't believe a second of it for a second, so banal and predictable is it.
  20. This is sweet-natured fun for the very young.
  21. It is in fact a traditional mystery more reminiscent of Agatha Christie than the reigning film noir aesthetic of 1947. But it's fabulously entertaining.
  22. Ultimately, the movie's biggest crime is its inability to convey the delicate, damaged texture of Kahlo's life, but also the triumph of her will over intimidating defeat.
  23. At once listless and overheated, giddy and utterly zipless, the current incarnation lacks not just the savoir-faire of its stylish predecessor but also the sex appeal.
  24. The direction has a fluid, no-nonsense authority, and the performances by Harris, Phifer and Cam'ron seal the deal.
  25. Will probably appeal only to the most committed of Leigh fans.
  26. Takes both its characters and the audience to the depths, but it's a journey Kidd redeems with wit and fluency and, ultimately, a deeply persistent humanism.
  27. Doesn't orchestrate the scares with much finesse.
  28. Castro remains the star of the show. You can't stop watching him.
  29. Great sword fights, great acting, fabulous sword fights and, of course, really cool sword fights.
  30. Pretentious, ponderous and redundant -- You may not need linear narrative to create a great movie, but you do need some original ideas.
  31. Handsomely shot by cinematographer Jim Denault, the film immerses the audience in Ana's world, its mosaic of colors and sounds and people, to create a vivid cinematic portrait not only of one girl but of an entire community.
  32. Consider the title your best advice.
  33. Nelson certainly passes muster for sincerity but, unfortunately, his movie doesn't have the same clear-cut quality.
  34. It never answers the key question: Why should we care?
  35. Has its creepy moments, but also its cliches.
  36. Stars Samuel L. Jackson in the worst role of his career -- one hopes.
  37. The documentary makes an effective and rather chilling case that there is an almost unbroken chain between Adolf Hitler and Saddam Hussein.
  38. Despite amazing access to Seinfeld backstage, we don't get a peek into the real man.
  39. Isn't much more than another conveyer-belt romantic comedy.
  40. A fairly straightforward, if preachy, tale about environmentalism.
  41. Will satisfy only those who can't tell the difference between the good, the bad and the ugly.
  42. It just never began to work for me, and the sub story behind the ghost story is far more interesting than the ghost story in front of the sub story.
  43. Oddly compelling.
  44. Sadly, the last 40-odd minutes are essentially one fight, pushed to the point of absurdity.
  45. The outlandish story and exaggerated colors ... swirl together to create an ethereal, sometimes sinister dreamscape.
  46. Rather than sparkle and dance, it plods.
  47. The worst mistake is the screenplay, which not only cuts everything into superficial pieces but fails to make authentic moments of anything. In the end, White Oleander isn't an adaptation of a novel. It's a flashy, star-splashed reduction.
  48. The only thing wrong with Bowling for Columbine is Moore himself.
  49. The film turns out to have nothing going for it at all, except a small charge for soul-deep Madonna haters.
    • 58 Metascore
    • 70 Critic Score
    There are entertaining little anachronisms, amusing lines and enough wacky frenzy to please the little ones. The movie clearly comes from a Christian perspective, but without being overly preachy.
  50. It's a mannered, precious exercise that seems to have less to do with lived moral dilemmas than with the smug piety of its makers.
  51. This ensemble comedy has its inventively funny moments. But ultimately, it gets a little too cute for its own good.
  52. As a terrifying example of what can happen when too many angry people are crowded into too small a space, it's a gripper.
    • 60 Metascore
    • 60 Critic Score
    Red Dragon is merely the distant echoes of what we liked about "Lambs."
    • 39 Metascore
    • 30 Critic Score
    Clumsily written and numbly performed comedy of yammers.
  53. The result isn't merely ludicrous, it's something far worse. It's drab. It's uninteresting. It squanders Chan's uniqueness; it could even be said to squander Jennifer Love Hewitt!
    • Washington Post
  54. Its strength is the documentary-textured depiction of Native Americans in their social environment. Its weakness is a story that's a patchy combination of soap opera, low-tech magic realism and, at times, ploddingly sociological commentary.
  55. Despite the film's shortcomings, the stories are quietly moving.
  56. Tends to speculation, conspiracy theories or, at best, circumstantial evidence.
  57. From the get-go, the story remains bogged down in its rather limited morass.
  58. At the movie's thoroughly expected conclusion, a visual joke has a bedraggled cat licking at the icing on a wedding cake, but it's really Melanie who gets to have it and eat it, too.
    • Washington Post
    • 59 Metascore
    • 90 Critic Score
    It's a combination of good story, nice moments and appealing texture.
  59. Damning legal brief against the former secretary of state.
  60. This movie pulls out so many bad-action-movie cliches, you wonder if this is a how-not-to primer.
  61. The movie's deeper problem and its primary disappointment: its unwillingness to deal directly with the issue of colonialism.
  62. From opening to closing credits, there isn't a single genuine moment -- as phony as a dime bag of oregano.
  63. Both a snore and utter tripe.
  64. A movie that grows better by the minute.
  65. A gorgeous, if disjointed, spectacle, made endurable – if not entirely comprehensible – by its eye-popping cast.
  66. In a movie as unrewarding as this, there's really only one burning question: When does the spanking begin?

Top Trailers