The New Yorker's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 3,482 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
37% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
61% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 1 point higher than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 66
| Highest review score: | Fiume o morte! | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Bio-Dome |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 1,940 out of 3482
-
Mixed: 1,344 out of 3482
-
Negative: 198 out of 3482
3482
movie
reviews
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Marlon Brando is airily light and masterly as the veteran anti-apartheid barrister who takes the case even though he knows that he can't get anywhere with the rigged court. He saves the picture for the (short) time onscreen. But the director, Euzhan Palcy, seems lost; her work is heavy-handed, and the script (by Colin Welland and the director, from a novel by Andre Brink) is earnest and didactic.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Under the guise of a Socialist parable about the economic determinism of personal behavior (class interests determine sexual choice, etc.) the writer-director, Lina Wertmuller, has actually introduced a new version of the story of Eve, the spoiler.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Jones gets everything--the gestures, the generosity, the mean streak, the bending of the ear to recitals of woe, whether across a lunch table or a prison cell. He even nails the voice, like that of a chorister caught running a racket with the incense.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
It’s not just a blast but, at moments, a thing of beauty, alive to the comic awesomeness of being lost in space.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jul 25, 2016
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Cassavetes films Rowlands, his wife, with self-deprecating adoration; the demanding man likens himself to the defenseless boy, and both are saved by this gloriously burdened woman who would kill for them.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
You cannot help being stirred by the reach and depth, the constant rebuffs to sloppiness, of a strong ensemble.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Jacky is not merely beefed up. He is a Minotaur in the making, and that, surely, is why his story becomes such a labyrinth. [27 Feb. 2012, p.87]- The New Yorker
Posted Feb 20, 2012 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
There's so much going on you can't take your eyes off it, but none of it means anything.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
The story fits together too neatly and the characters remain ciphers, but scenes of news reports of the high-profile deals—in which the protagonists see themselves—evoke an eerie air of plausibility and alienation.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jul 28, 2016
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
The result is an evasive, baffling, unexciting production - anything but a classic.- The New Yorker
- Posted Mar 26, 2012
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Observant and true. The pleasure of it lies not in its emotions, which are distinctly on the tepid side, but in the intimacy of its reporting. [28 July 2003, p.94]- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The whole thing became amorphous and confused. Paramount did rather better by the romance than the politics; Ingrid Bergman is lovely and affecting as Maria.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The pictures is an almost total drag, though Agnes Moorehead, as the villainess, has a sensational exit through plate-glass windows.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
It's a shame that the movie whose coattails these wonderful actors are attached to is such an empty suit.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The premise of this Hitchcock thriller is promising, but the movie, set in Quebec and partly shot there, is so reticent it's mostly dull.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
This unapologetically grown-up movie about separating is perhaps the most revealing American movie of its era. Though the director, Alan Parker, doesn't do anything innovative in technique, it's a modern movie in terms of its consciousness.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
A genial, messy comedy of marital discord and mismatched lovers.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jul 24, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
In short, Peter Berg has done it again. You come out shaken with excitement, but with a touch of shame, too, at being so easily thrilled.- The New Yorker
- Posted Oct 3, 2016
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Lamb preens and strains to be admired even as it reduces its characters to pieces on a game board and its actors to puppets.- The New Yorker
- Posted Oct 11, 2021
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Is it conceivable that Holland’s bleak, murky, and instructive film could prompt a change of heart in the current Russian establishment, or even a confession of crimes past? Not a chance.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jun 22, 2020
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Ayer should have dropped the movie-within-a-movie, which is confusing in an unproductive way -- we share the men's point of view without it. [24 Sept. 2012, p. 98]- The New Yorker
Posted Sep 19, 2012 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
That is the thing about Gibson, fool that he is in other ways: he has learned how to tell a tale, and to raise a pulse in the telling. You have to admire that basic gift, uncommon as it is in Hollywood these days.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New Yorker
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Tintin is exhausting, and, for all its wonders, it wears one out well before it's over.- The New Yorker
- Posted Dec 5, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
What matters most about The Homesman, which Jones co-wrote and directed, is how willingly, and movingly, he cedes the stage to Hilary Swank, as Clint Eastwood did in “Million Dollar Baby.”- The New Yorker
- Posted Nov 10, 2014
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
In truth, every performance in Everything Went Fine is nicely judged—too much so, I suspect, for many filmgoers, who will be praying for someone to explode. Yet the movie is anything but bland.- The New Yorker
- Posted Apr 17, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
A classic screwball fantasy - a neglected modern comedy that's like a more restless and visually high-spirited version of the W.C. Fields pictures...Set in the world of competing used-car dealers in the booming Southwest, this picture has a wonderful, energetic heartlessness; it's an American tall-tale movie in a Pop Art form. The premise is that honesty doesn't exist; if you develop a liking for some of the characters, it's not because they're free of avarice but because of their style of avarice.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The stage of Early Man, though, is stuffed with men and women — on the Neanderthal spectrum, it’s true, but propelled by needs and greeds much like our own — whereas the beasts of the field and the fowls of the air are reduced to the role of extras. It pains me to say so, but Hognob is not enough.- The New Yorker
- Posted Feb 19, 2018
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The movie is often absorbing, and skillfully played, but, along with its snarling hero, it doesn’t have much time for ordinary folk. By the end, like Marianne, we are left gasping for air.- The New Yorker
- Posted Sep 21, 2015
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
Writer-director Tamara Jenkins hits on a visual style that perfectly reflects her script's endearing juxtaposition of wackiness, sweetness, and sorrow.- The New Yorker
- Read full review