The New Yorker's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 3,482 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
37% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
61% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 1 point higher than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 66
| Highest review score: | Fiume o morte! | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Bio-Dome |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 1,940 out of 3482
-
Mixed: 1,344 out of 3482
-
Negative: 198 out of 3482
3482
movie
reviews
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
It's a very even work, with no thudding bad lines and no low stretches, but it doesn't have the loose, manic highs of some of Allen's other films.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Through Glassman’s diligent and empathetic investigations, it becomes a film of documents, in which the aura of the letters—the worlds that they contain in their text and evoke in their sheer physical presence—generates overwhelming emotional power.- The New Yorker
- Posted Mar 2, 2022
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
The film’s real charge lies elsewhere—in Preminger’s view of a jolting, disoriented age of rock and roll.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
For some viewers, the acidity level of Perry’s movie will be too high to stomach. For others — anyone who thinks that there are too many warm hugs in Strindberg, for example — Queen of Earth awaits.- The New Yorker
- Posted Aug 31, 2015
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The writer and director, Paul King, scatters the tale with handfuls of eccentric charm, first in the forest and then in the home of the Browns. At one point, borrowing freely from Wes Anderson, he frames it as a living doll’s house, with each member of the family hard at work or play in a different room.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jan 12, 2015
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
The exceptional, often overwhelming power of the script that Polley wrote, based on Miriam Toews’s novel, is, if not undercut, not amplified by the filming.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jan 6, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
The hallucinatory power of ayahuasca and the incantatory lure of rituals fuse with existential dread in this darkly hypnotic drama.- The New Yorker
- Posted May 15, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
M-G-M's wartime salute to gallant England, engineered to make the audience choke up.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Whenever the movie strays from its hero, you feel oddly impatient to get back to him, to watch his cravings do battle with his conscience, and to wonder anew what’s burning in his blue-green gaze.- The New Yorker
- Posted Feb 10, 2020
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
For a better reckoning of 1968, you need a better writer — Norman Mailer, unloved by Buckley and Vidal alike, whose “Miami and the Siege of Chicago” covered the same events. Next to his fervid look at the sinews of power, as they sweat and flex, Best of Enemies is barely more than a skit.- The New Yorker
- Posted Aug 3, 2015
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
For all its scruffiness, the lurching strike-rate of its gags, and the unmistakable smell of amateur dramatics given off by its repertory of rotating players with their stick-on Ted Nugent beards, Life of Brian jitters with good will. [3 May 2004, p. 110]- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Above all, the movie offers the mournful thrill of new methods that Kiarostami didn’t live to develop further.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jan 29, 2018
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
An exhausting, morbidly fascinating, and finally thrilling experience.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Lester's decorative clutter is the best thing about the film: he loves scurrilous excess. But the whole thing feels hectic and forced. You want some gallantry and charm; you don't want joke, joke, joke.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The over-all effect is as taut with tangible evidence as a detective story.- The New Yorker
- Posted Mar 13, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Eminem does not come off as a megalomaniac in 8 Mile, but he expects people to be very, very impressed. I doubt he could lend himself to a fiction that said anything else: his eyes couldn't tell any story but his own. [11 November 2002, p. 195]- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
An extraordinarily precise and well-made political thriller--the best thing Polanski has done since the seventies, when he brought out the incomparable “Chinatown” and the very fine “Tess.”- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Of the two attempts, I still prefer the one from my childhood.- The New Yorker
- Posted Apr 18, 2016
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Sinatra’s vocal swagger is as exhilarating as ever, on a stage that gives him room to strut. And the overall effect is to heighten the effect and the presence of Frank Loesser’s brash yet subtle and bluff yet intricate songs. It’s not filmed theatre, but the cinematic transfiguration of the theatrical experience.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
That is what I admire in While We’re Young; it shows a director not so much mooning over the past, with regret for faded powers, as probing his own obsessions and the limits of his style.- The New Yorker
- Posted Mar 23, 2015
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
In its own sombre, inflated terms, the picture is effective, but it's dragged out so many self-importantly that you have time to recognize what a hopelessly naive, incompetent, and untrustworthy lawyer the hero is.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
As the real-life Ronald Woodroof, he (Mcconaughey) does work that is pretty much astounding. [4 Nov. 2013, p.116]- The New Yorker
Posted Oct 31, 2013 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
With a teeming cast of vibrantly unglamorous Chicago characters who hold Eddie in a tight social web, Swanberg—aided greatly by Johnson’s vigorous performance—makes the gambler’s panic-stricken silence all the more agonizing, balancing the warm veneer of intimate normalcy with the inner chill of secrets and lies.- The New Yorker
- Posted Apr 7, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Arnow’s poignant and original performance—refined in its awkwardness, exalted in its degradation, touched with grace in its rude self-presentation—is a double masterwork of acting and directing.- The New Yorker
- Posted Apr 29, 2024
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The film is slowed by its own beauty, but it is salvaged by two majestic scenes.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
This Australia film - the pictorial re-creation of a late-Victorian novel - shows considerable charm and craft, though it's essentially taxidermy.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The picture might have been a pop classic if it had stayed near the level of impudence that it reaches at its best. But about midway as Eddie has a crisis of confidence, and when Eddie locks his jaw and sets forth to become a purified man of integrity, the joy goes out of Newman's performance, which (despite the efforts of a lot of good actors) is the only life in the movie, except for a brief, startling performance by the 25-year-old black actor Forest Whitaker as a pool shark called Amos.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The film, directed by Perry Henzell, is feverish and haphazard, but the music redeems much of it, and the rhythmic swing of the Jamaican speech is hypnotic.- The New Yorker
Posted Oct 3, 2019 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Its clarity and simplicity—and the outrageous, nearly humorous audacity with which its brisk mysteries conjure wide-ranging, complex, and turbulent stories—makes it among Hong’s most compulsively rewatchable films.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jan 18, 2022
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
This is a fully felt, morally alert, marvellously acted piece of work. Despite the grim subject, it's a sweet-tempered movie, with moments of explosive humor-an entertainment.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by