The New Yorker's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 3,482 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
37% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
61% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 1 point higher than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 66
| Highest review score: | Fiume o morte! | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Bio-Dome |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 1,940 out of 3482
-
Mixed: 1,344 out of 3482
-
Negative: 198 out of 3482
3482
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Lady Bird, daring, distinctive, and personal in text and theme, is recognizably conventional in texture and style.- The New Yorker
- Posted Dec 27, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
However moody, though, Two Lovers didn't strike me as a downer, for the simple reason that it wells with sights and sounds that are guaranteed to lift, not sink, the spirits.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
As a performer, Morales is laughably smart, sympathetic, and engaging, and what’s so clever about Language Lessons is the deployment of that allure.- The New Yorker
- Posted Sep 7, 2021
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
World War Z is the most gratifying action spectacle in years, and one reason for its success if the Pitt doesn't play a superhero. [1 July 2013, p.76]- The New Yorker
Posted Jun 29, 2013 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Skillful and compelling this film may be, but, if Neil Armstrong had been the sort of fellow who was likely to cry on the moon, he wouldn’t have been the first man chosen to go there. He would have been the last.- The New Yorker
- Posted Oct 8, 2018
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
The movie is a moralized historical fantasy, mixing love and politics in Old Hollywood style. Yet I can’t bring myself to be indignant about its inventions. Gugu Mbatha-Raw, who was born in Oxford and has acted since she was a child, speaks her lines with tremulous emotion and, finally, radiant authority. Austen, I think, would have been thrilled.- The New Yorker
- Posted May 12, 2014
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Diop does more in “Saint Omer” than create an original and far-reaching courtroom drama; she establishes an aesthetic, distinctive to the courtroom setting, that seemingly puts the characters’ language itself in the frame along with the psychological vectors that connect them. This spare and straightforward method gives rise to a film of vast reach and great complexity.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jan 17, 2023
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
William Wellman's direction is more leisurely than usual; he has such good material here that he takes his time.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Misericordia is, fundamentally, a snappy and satisfying entertainment, a thriller that thrills.- The New Yorker
- Posted Mar 24, 2025
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
The hallucinatory power of ayahuasca and the incantatory lure of rituals fuse with existential dread in this darkly hypnotic drama.- The New Yorker
- Posted May 15, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Even as the film abounds in behavioral details, rendering its four protagonists’ personalities in sharp outlines, it never presumes to know too much about them; the movie shows what Sasquatches are like without assuming what it’s like to be a Sasquatch.- The New Yorker
- Posted Apr 5, 2024
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Miraculously, he (Polanski) brightens the faded material, and conjures his most graceful work in years.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jun 23, 2014
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New Yorker
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Orson Welles' portrait of the friend, Harry Lime, is a study of corruption - evil, witty, unreachable.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
A big, enjoyable musical biography, well directed by Michael Curtiz.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
A low-budget winner--a romantic fable about a Philadelphia palooka who gains his manhood, written by and starring muscle-bound Sylvester Stallone, who is repulsive one moment, noble the next. He's amazing to watch.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
For all the film’s roiling action, its inner life is in little grace notes that open enormous vistas of time.- The New Yorker
- Posted May 19, 2022
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Rarely have high spirits and theatrical energy seemed like such a tragic waste; an era and its myths seem to be dying on-screen in real time.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Scott may always have had an eye on the box office, but from "Alien" and "Thelma & Louise" on, he has made women into heroines. In that regard, he's still ahead of the curve. Rapace's scene is a classic of its kind; it tops John Hurt's notorious misfortunes in "Alien."- The New Yorker
- Posted Jun 11, 2012
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Along with the wild psychology of “Suburban Fury,” Devor evokes the era’s wild politics, which, for all its ideological phantasmagoria, create unimpeachable realities.- The New Yorker
- Posted Dec 8, 2025
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Farsi hasn’t made a rhetorical film of persuasion—anyone who needs a name and a face to be moved by reports of killings is beyond persuading—but a personal memorial for a friend and a public archive of that friend’s work.- The New Yorker
- Posted Dec 8, 2025
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Vincente Minnelli directed, in a confident, confectionery styles that carries all--or almost all--before it.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Most fruitful of all is the husbandry of the gags, some of which are planted early in the film and must wait for more than an hour before they bloom.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jan 8, 2018
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Fast and enjoyable, with Poitier's color used for comedy.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Strangest of all, we go along with it in a sort of dream, scarcely pausing to complain, so expert is Mungiu at drawing us into the fold of these passionate souls. [8 March 2013, p.80]- The New Yorker
Posted Mar 7, 2013 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Nothing out of the ordinary happens in Blue Valentine, and that, together with the vital, untrammelled performances of the two leading actors, is the root of its power.- The New Yorker
- Posted Dec 28, 2010
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The ghost, on the other hand, grows ever more imposing, and the movie’s most touching spectacle — it’s also the funniest — is that of C standing at the window and waving to another ghost, in the adjacent house.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jul 3, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Stroker slips down the gullet with less fuss, but there are enough blood sprays and snapped vertebrae to pacify the director's clamorous fan club -- and, for the rest of us, plenty of chances to reconsider his style. It is, unquestionably, something to behold. [8 March 2013, p.80]- The New Yorker
Posted Mar 7, 2013 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Okja is a fairy tale of sorts, though too foulmouthed for children; it nips from pastoral bliss to a terrorist pig-napping by the Animal Liberation Front; and it takes the eco-menace from Bong’s sublime “The Host” (2006) and replays the fright as farce, with a spirited turn from Tilda Swinton, as the company boss, and, I’m afraid, a barely watchable one from Jake Gyllenhaal, as a drunk TV presenter.- The New Yorker
- Posted Jul 3, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
It’s one of the great movies about the continuity of art and life, about the back-and-forth flow between personal relationships and artistic achievements—and about the artifices and agonized secrets on which both depend.- The New Yorker
- Posted Nov 24, 2021
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by