The New Yorker's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 3,482 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
37% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
61% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 1 point higher than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 66
| Highest review score: | Fiume o morte! | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Bio-Dome |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 1,940 out of 3482
-
Mixed: 1,344 out of 3482
-
Negative: 198 out of 3482
3482
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
Michael Sragow
In this smutty kiddie farce he's a clownish action toy, and he grows wearying, fast.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
But by the end, the charm and delicacy of the 1961 cartoon have long been replaced by laborious gross-outs. Is this now official Disney policy?- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Travel-folder footage of Rio mixed with father-daughter incest (in a disguised form)...Most of the movie is an attempt to squirm out from under its messy erotic-parental subject.- The New Yorker
Posted Jun 28, 2017 -
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
It's a dull, poky picture, which provides an unwelcome showcase for MacLaine's increasingly insufferable cute-gorgon shtick and no showcase at all for Cage's tremendous comic talents.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The funniest thing about The Women is that Mick Jagger is one of the producers.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
In the end, Dreamcatcher is an abominable-worm picture. The movie is also an unholy mess, a miserably organized and redundant collection of arbitrary scares and thrills without a unifying visual or poetic idea. [31 March 2003, p. 106]- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
This is a certifiably loony picture; it's so bad it puts you in a state of shock.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
What we have here is a fouled-up fairy tale of oppression and empowerment, and it’s hard not to be ensnared by its mixture of rank maleficence and easy reverie. The gap between being genuinely stirred and having your arm twisted, however, is narrower than we care to admit.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The Expendables is savage yet inert, and breathtakingly sleazy in its lack of imagination.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
The director, Frank Marshall, who has produced films for Steven Spielberg, gets his own Michael Crichton book to play with—and the results are disastrous.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
What Lars von Trier has achieved is avant-gardism for idiots. From beginning to end, Dogville is obtuse and dislikable, a whimsical joke wearing cement shoes. [29 March 2004, p. 103]- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
Has so many things wrong with it that one can only stare at the screen in disbelief. [25 April, 2011 p. 89]- The New Yorker
Posted Apr 22, 2011 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Moore, a big shambling joker who's the director, producer, writer, and star, deadpans his way through interviews with an assortment of unlikely people, who are used as stooges. And he does something that is humanly very offensive: Roger & Me uses its leftism as a superior attitude.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
The movie is exhausting, utterly without feeling, and pointless -- though Smith looks great in his Western outfit.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
Madonna's mess of a movie grabs at the rub and rancor of multiculturalism, which it proceeds to squash into a litter of clichés, or, more simply, insults.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
So lazy is the characterization, so hamstrung the plot, and so chronically broad the overacting that the main interest lies in deciding which to block first, your eyes or your ears. [2 Sept. 2013, p.81]- The New Yorker
Posted Aug 31, 2013 -
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Under the guise of a Socialist parable about the economic determinism of personal behavior (class interests determine sexual choice, etc.) the writer-director, Lina Wertmuller, has actually introduced a new version of the story of Eve, the spoiler.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
"I wish they'd just trade me out of this mess," Dr. J says early on. Even the scenes on the basketball court are terrible. Not the least of the mess is the music, by Thom Bell. [19 Nov 1979, p.221]- The New Yorker
-
- The New Yorker
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The director is Bob Spiers, though it's hard to judge whether he actually turned up on the set.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The general opinion of Revenge of the Sith seems to be that it marks a distinct improvement on the last two episodes, "The Phantom Menace" and "Attack of the Clones." True, but only in the same way that dying from natural causes is preferable to crucifixion.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
It is a grind, it is a slog, it is a bore—it’s a mental toothache of a movie, whose ending grants not so much resolution as relief.- The New Yorker
- Posted Mar 18, 2021
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
A vicious, grindingly manipulative urban mystery that uses a thick atmosphere of S & M kinkiness to distract the audience from the story's thinness and inanity.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
- The New Yorker
-
-
Reviewed by
Michael Sragow
The movie is a peculiarly irritating failure -- a leaden piece of uplift.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anthony Lane
The Catholic Church has nothing to fear from this film. It is not just tripe. It is self-evident, spirit-lowering tripe that could not conceivably cause a single member of the flock to turn aside from the faith.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
The sheer ineptitude of the movie is supposed to be funny, but there's no lunacy behind it: Shore and his writers are like comedians on Prozac, smiling through the fart jokes without a hint of desperation.- The New Yorker
- Read full review