For 20,324 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
46% higher than the average critic
-
5% same as the average critic
-
49% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 4.2 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 61
| Highest review score: | Short Cuts | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Gummo |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 9,408 out of 20324
-
Mixed: 8,449 out of 20324
-
Negative: 2,467 out of 20324
20324
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
A likable rites-of-passage memory piece doused in period nostalgia, including the prominent use of vintage Movietone newsreels to mark the events of World War II.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
Like the best war movies -- and like martial literature going back to the Iliad -- it balances the dreadful, unassuageable cruelty of warfare and the valor and decency of those who fight.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
Reminds us that when it comes to comedy, it's all in the writing. Mr. Kalesniko's satirically barbed screenplay, whose spirit harks back to the comic heyday of Blake Edwards, stirs up an insistent verbal energy that rarely flags.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
What makes this Cherry Orchard different from almost every other interpretation (and makes it essential viewing for lovers of Chekhov) is Ms. Rampling's extraordinarily rich portrait of Ranevskaya.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
Beneath its stylistic and structural quirks, Big Bad Love -- is a self-indulgent celebration of self-indulgence.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
There's not much here; some of the shots feel so static that you wonder if they're being rehearsed before your eyes.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
Everybody loves a David and Goliath story, and this one is told almost entirely from David's point of view.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
The surface is rough and profane enough, and the acting sufficiently restrained, to cover the sentimental story with a varnish of gritty realism. But stylish bravado and bad-boy performances don't make the film any less predictable.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
The agile handling of the soap-opera elements -- conventional plotting at best -- finally makes "Wedding" a pop, facile take on Capulet versus Montague stuff, likable but square.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
As the movie dragged on, I thought I heard a mysterious voice, and felt myself powerfully drawn toward the light -- the light of the exit sign. I have returned from the beyond to warn you: this movie is 90 minutes long, and life is too short.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
"Queen" is a movie that stoops to jokes like calling Lestat's CD "a monster hit"; the movie is just a plain old monster.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
If Return to Never Land -- doesn't have a story to match the original's in breadth and imagination, it does a smooth job of recycling its characters and themes.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
Feels more like a thought experiment than a fully developed story.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
For those in search of something different, Wendigo is a genuinely bone-chilling tale.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
Wants to be everything and adds up to nothing. "War" is a film that tries to excel on several levels and falls flat on all of them.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
Everything she (Spears) does seems diluted and secondhand and is never transformed into something original or indelibly self-expressive.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
Bad and tasteless. You laugh neither with it nor at it but rather sit counting the minutes while the movie laughs, for no good reason, at itself.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
An inviting piece of film. Mr. Rubbo's cast of characters have the charisma of true devotees and stoked egos that match their intentions.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
Too leisurely paced and visually drab for its own good, it succeeds in being only sporadically amusing.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
The current version, however, like its predecessor, fails as entertainment. Mr. McTiernan's remake may be lighter on its feet -- the sober-minded original was as graceful as a tap-dancing rhino -- but it is just as boring and as obvious.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
If Ms. Bynes keeps going in this direction, she can conceivably develop a gallery of characters as rich and varied as Tracey Ullman's.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
Manages to squeeze in several different endings — like a bad pop song that doesn't know when to fade out. But as Mr. Schwarzenegger's stature as an action figure diminishes, his effort to retain a piece of the market is touching.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
Mr. Kang is a gifted choreographer of bloody chaos, but he has enough range and imagination to strew a few interludes of haunting tenderness amid the shell casings and ketchup packs.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
This breathless demi-noir has so much bounce that we barely get any time to mull over the gaping holes in its moth-eaten plot. It is competent but extremely slight.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
As A Rumor of Angels reveals itself to be a sudsy tub of supernatural hokum, not even Ms. Redgrave's noblest efforts can redeem it from hopeless sentimentality.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
So lazy and slipshod it confuses the mere flashing of kinky soft-core imagery with naughty fun.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by