Seattle Post-Intelligencer's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 2,931 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
64% higher than the average critic
-
3% same as the average critic
-
33% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 0.9 points higher than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 66
| Highest review score: | Peter Pan | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Mindhunters |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 1,824 out of 2931
-
Mixed: 872 out of 2931
-
Negative: 235 out of 2931
2931
movie
reviews
-
-
Reviewed by
Sean Axmaker
Pitches itself somewhere between "Bound" and "Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels," trying to add a feminist twist to the spate of Britain's bloody gangster thrillers and never quite succeeding.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
William Arnold
Another gutsy, big-budget movie that dares to say something new and optimistic about our messed-up times. And it almost, but not quite, brings it off.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Sean Axmaker
There are some surprises to be had amid the cruelty (inflicted by both Jigsaw and his test subjects), but this time around the ordeal is less grueling than simply distasteful.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
William Arnold
It's a strange and strangely unaffecting little drama -- but played very flat, with no particular emotional impact sought or achieved.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
William Arnold
For all its improbable characters, wretched dialogue and stock situations, the movie has an earnest dumbness that sneaks up on you to be surprisingly entertaining.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
William Arnold
The movie's problem is that it's a cartoon, offering no emotional involvement with its characters and no dramatic imperative.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
William Arnold
Surprise! The remake is not a heresy. It's a decent enough stab at being what the old movie was to its time, following the same basic plot, full of respectful references to its model, updated with a gallery of fairly imaginative special effects.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
William Arnold
Visually impressive but exceedingly unpleasant little nail-biter.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
William Arnold
The big downside of the film is that it always feels slightly contrived.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Bill White
Three movies gasp for life inside the clumsily titled Marilyn Hotchkiss' Ballroom Dancing & Charm School.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
William Arnold
Cult-favorite director Victor Salva ("Jeepers Creepers" I & II) is a competent visual storyteller and the film believes in itself so strongly (and with such a straight face) that it's hard not to halfway enjoy it.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Sean Axmaker
Has all the telltale signs of desperate re-editing: mismatched shots, clumsy transitions and a devastating car wreck that occurred either on a dry sunlit day or in the midst of a nighttime downpour, depending on the flashback.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Sean Axmaker
Even as the prosaic script gets lost in the intoxicating fantasy of the bloodless revolution, the hot heartbeat of the music drives the film with pure energy.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
William Arnold
But the movie is mostly just bad, and probably the nadir of Pakula's otherwise distinguished career. As played by Kline and Mastrantonio, victim and wife here are just too dumb to be even remotely sympathetic; and the script is so predictable and yet so utterly preposterous every step of the way that it insults the intelligence of even the most undiscerning moviegoer. [16 Oct 1992]- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
William Arnold
First-time director Fisher Stevens has a flair for dialogue comedy, the film operates nicely off the element of surprise, and the large cast is solid -- especially Marisa Tomei, who in an extended cameo as a merry dominatrix rarely has been more convincing.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Sean Axmaker
A perfectly competent, if undistinguished, action film that smoothes over all the most interesting bumps in the drama.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
The supporting cast, peppered with seasoned pros like Levy, Smart, Betty White and a hilarious Joan Plowright, milk underwritten roles with gusto.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
William Arnold
A slow-moving, unashamedly weepy, middle-age love story of the kind big-studio Hollywood doesn't often make anymore.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
William Arnold
The movie offers several moments in which Williams comes alive, but they're few and far between.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Sean Axmaker
While too bland and stupid to be offensive, Never Back Down spouts a hollow message of nonviolence while celebrating the brutal satisfaction of beating the crap out of someone.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
William Arnold
It is a foul-mouthed British underworld comedy so they may be hoping it will attract the hip audience of films like "Snatch" and "Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels."- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
The only real difference between this and the handful of other Happy Madison flicks is that James (executive producer, co-writer, star) has made this Sandleresque movie family-friendly, with very little swearing, no nudity and all the edginess of a "King of Queens" rerun.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
William Arnold
It's a by-the-numbers action affair, and one that is considerably more mean-spirited and humorless than the norm. [4 Aug 1995, p.29]- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
William Arnold
It's a formula job all the way, filled with pratfalls, flying food, much male incompetence in the face of child-rearing realities, and a cast of violence-prone children on sugar highs who somehow turn into angels by the film's last sappy moments.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
William Arnold
The whole enterprise is a colossal waste of everyone's time.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Sean Axmaker
So grim and humorless that the first half almost sinks into silliness.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
William Arnold
But the movie's vital signs improve remarkably in the second half, and especially in the last act. The proceedings suddenly pick up some screwball charm, the writing improves (with several truly inspired one-liners tossed in here and there) and the secondary characters begin to click.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review