Seattle Post-Intelligencer's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 2,931 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
64% higher than the average critic
-
3% same as the average critic
-
33% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 0.9 points higher than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 66
| Highest review score: | Peter Pan | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Mindhunters |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 1,824 out of 2931
-
Mixed: 872 out of 2931
-
Negative: 235 out of 2931
2931
movie
reviews
-
-
Reviewed by
William Arnold
It doesn't really come off, but it's an admirably ambitious, and mostly very engaging, coming-of-age adventure that apes the spirit of Joseph Conrad.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
William Arnold
It's so irrelevant, unambitious and lazy it almost seems to be thumbing its nose at the daring filmmaker Woody once was.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
William Arnold
No movie that stars Sean Connery can be completely worthless but Medicine Man comes about as close to it as anything the actor has done in a long time - probably since Meteor in 1979. [07 Feb 1992]- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
William Arnold
Like Lurie's previous two films, it's also simplistic and somewhat muddled.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Paula Nechak
What emerges is a funny and sometimes aching movie that treads familiar dysfunctional family turf but still manages to eke out an emotionally toned balance.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
William Arnold
The bogus Seattle setting creates an additional problem for local moviegoers. Because we know Seattle doesn't have a subway, giant FBI building or newspapers called Telegraph or Tribune, we're jarred out of the story so regularly that it leaves us slightly punch-drunk.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
William Arnold
Hocus Pocus also offers a slightly different kind of movie role for the Divine Miss M, which she carries off fearlessly. In fact, with her campy makeup and wildly extravagant gestures, she is probably closer here to her cabaret roots than she has been on film before - and her oldest, purest fans are sure to love her for it. [16 July 1993]- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
-
Reviewed by
-
- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
William Arnold
The story is so sure-fire that it surmounts these obstacles to be passable entertainment, getting frequent infusions of excitement from the performances of Charlie Sheen, who is likably ironic and deadpan as Aramis; Kiefer Sutherland, who is splendidly charismatic and appealing as the world-weary Athos; and Oliver Platt, who confidently steals the movie as the comic Porthos. [12 Nov 1993]- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
William Arnold
Like most Price movies, it's challenging, engaging and free of the usual thriller cliches.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Sean Axmaker
There's every reason to believe the creators stopped taking it seriously a long time ago. What's bothersome is that they don't take the audience seriously enough to deliver an actual movie.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Sean Axmaker
There are too many unearned runs to fully embrace this underdog triumph.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
William Arnold
Goes down like a cool glass of lemonade on a hot day.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Sean Axmaker
It's often helplessly hilarious in its adolescent gross-out way, yet the cast periodically invests the film with sweetness.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Sean Axmaker
Black's apoplectic fits and sardonic rants are strictly a bonus for the parents dragged along for the adolescent shenanigans.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
William Arnold
The film is not very convincing as sociology, but it is mildly amusing as comedy, has an unpolished charm to its visuals and performances, and showcases so many rock songs on its soundtrack that it qualifies as a musical. [19 Apr 1991]- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
The film is so truncated, so obsessed with style and composed of so many self-contained episodes that it fails to say anything new.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
William Arnold
This new version has absolutely none of the distinctive tongue-in-cheek black humor that was the keynote of its model and the trademark of its original director, Paul Bartel.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Sean Axmaker
Director Bill Duke may believe the message but he never invests himself in the characters or their story, which becomes an illustrated lesson with reflective interludes and comic relief.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
William Arnold
It's well-acted by a likable cast and is well-intended, but it misses: It doesn't come off as the powerful socio-environmental statement it wants to be.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
William Arnold
It struck me as the most exciting and original Hollywood thriller, occult or otherwise, since "The Sixth Sense."- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
William Arnold
The cast tries hard and a sprinkling of laughs results, but the project is defeated by a concept that is not very novel, a script that is not especially witty, direction that is neither sharp nor insightful and one-note characters that are simply not very interesting.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
William Arnold
Unlike "Crying Game" (which, despite the gender confusion, definitely works as a love story for a general audience), the only emotion this movie evokes for its star-crossed lovers is an unpleasant sense of incredulity. [08 Oct 1993]- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Paula Nechak
Pretty silly stuff, designed to appeal more to older kids and adults than the toddler brigade.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
William Arnold
The movie is all action. But there's no pacing, no suspense and no vulnerability for the protagonist so it all soon gets numbingly tiresome.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
Fans of the first "Princess Diaries" will find enough laughs and diamonds in the rough to sustain them on their way to this important moral.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
William Arnold
One of the year's few sci-fi films that actually takes itself seriously, and a movie that goes a long way on the strength of its unique premise, steady performances and impressive visual style.- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by