New York Post's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 8,343 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
44% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
54% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 8.2 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 57
| Highest review score: | Patriots Day | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Zombie! vs. Mardi Gras |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 4,334 out of 8343
-
Mixed: 1,701 out of 8343
-
Negative: 2,308 out of 8343
8343
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
The acting is, at best, serviceable; the sound track is too often unintelligible; the direction is often over the top; and the script relies heavily on stereotypes.- New York Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
V.A. Musetto
This poorly done, digitally animated work, directed by Hiroyuki Kitakubo, might be of interest to die-hard fans of anime. Others should pass it by.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Foreman
Intelligent, moving and often beautifully photographed, Aberdeen boasts superb performances.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
We began this dismal movie season with one lethally bad World War II romance -- "Pearl Harbor" -- and now we're wrapping up with another howling dog.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
Repackage clichés and stereotypes with attractive young performers in a simple-minded script that panders to the teen audience.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- New York Post
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Foreman
You can tell this is a smart take on Hamlet from the first wordless opening shots.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Foreman
In general, it's a confusing, rather shapeless disappointment.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
Indulges in some of the crudest Jewish stereotypes seen in a recent movie, right down to the crack about every Jewish girl having a nose job.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Foreman
Very, very funny, albeit inferior in a number of ways to the original.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Foreman
It's no funnier than your average grade-school biology lesson and less pedagogically useful than your typical Farrelly brothers comedy.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
It's in the teenage section where the film goes seriously wrong and veers from an absorbing family story.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
The film isn't remotely scary. That's a shame, because it has top-notch performances by Peter Mullan and David Caruso.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
What Amenabar offers here is an unconvincing, pretentiously artsy pastiche of just about every hoary old gothic thriller you can think of.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
An intelligent, extremely well-acted thriller about a mother's endless love for her son.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
V.A. Musetto
The faint of heart might want to leave early. If you elect to stay, remember: You were warned.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Foreman
Even the lovemaking scenes between two of Hollywood's most attractive stars -- often shot from above, like Cinemax soft porn -- are so unerotic, they make your skin crawl.- New York Post
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Foreman
The contrast between Chan's charm and physical prowess and Tucker's lack of same is even more dramatic in this tiresome, leaden sequel.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
Occasionally funny but more often hackneyed, schmaltzy, predictable and overdone fairy tale that seems longer than 100 choruses of ''Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious."- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Foreman
You won't see any film this year as beautiful, and plain thrilling as Apocalypse Now Redux. Watching it after sitting through this summer's record number of dumb, dreadful movies is almost a painfully good experience. [3 Aug 2001, p.30]- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Foreman
The marvelous Burtonic gothic/nightmare production design -- scenery, weaponry, costumes, etc. constantly pleases the eye without ever distracting you from the plot.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- New York Post
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
So s-l-o-w-l-y paced it seems twice as long as its two-hour running time.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- New York Post
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
V.A. Musetto
The director has listed Jean-Luc Godard as an influence, which explains the movie's French New Wave exuberance.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
Barely enough chuckles to keep from running out of gas. Yet it's the sharpest-looking movie shot so far on digital video, outdistancing even "The Anniversary Party."- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
Mostly it fails to score. Maybe that's why no one has attempted summer-camp comedy since the third "Meatballs" sequel a decade ago.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
Entertaining and heartwarming -- especially when Mirren sweeps into scenes with acid observations that fail to disguise a heart of gold.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
Accurately described as an Icelandic version of Pedro Almodovar's gender-bending black comedies -- but it's also reminiscent of early Woody Allen movies.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Foreman
Takeshi's elliptical directorial style here is overwhelmed by the script's crudeness and lack of narrative power.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by