New York Post's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 8,345 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
44% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
54% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 8.3 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 57
| Highest review score: | Patriots Day | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Zombie! vs. Mardi Gras |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 4,335 out of 8345
-
Mixed: 1,702 out of 8345
-
Negative: 2,308 out of 8345
8345
movie
reviews
-
-
Reviewed by
Kyle Smith
There are enough sharp one-liners and funny situations to keep things entertaining even as Braff delves (lightly) into genuine dilemmas confronting many a married couple.- New York Post
- Posted Jul 16, 2014
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kyle Smith
As for a villain, you could do worse than Bryan Cranston as the evil political overlord who is trying to stamp out the resistance -- When he goes mano a mano with Farrell, it's not spine-tingling. It's embarrassing, like watching a dude beat up his dad.- New York Post
- Posted Aug 3, 2012
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Foreman
It's an even rarer pleasure to see a film that combines exciting action with a smart, well-informed script and vivid yet restrained performances.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- New York Post
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
V.A. Musetto
The opening and closing scenes are scary and should please fans of the genre, especially at Halloween time.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Foreman
Woo has never been particularly good at human stuff, and to the extent that Paycheck is, or should be, a love story, it feels forced.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
V.A. Musetto
Under writer-helmer Rehana Mirza, the acting and direction are workmanlike, but the plot is full of hackneyed characters and contrived events better suited to TV than the big screen.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
V.A. Musetto
Most are exercises in sickening bad taste, with an emphasis on human bodily functions. The biggest stinkers? “T Is for Toilet” and “F Is for Fart.”- New York Post
- Posted Mar 7, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Sara Stewart
Temple and Angarano, entertaining enough, never quite sell the idea that this goodhearted couple would be so easily transformed by greed.- New York Post
- Posted Apr 4, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- New York Post
- Read full review
-
- New York Post
- Read full review
-
- New York Post
- Read full review
-
- New York Post
- Posted Apr 13, 2012
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
V.A. Musetto
The documentary tells us little we don't already know and is overwhelmingly one-sided. It would make a nice TV infomercial, but certainly doesn't deserve a big-screen release.- New York Post
- Posted Aug 23, 2012
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
V.A. Musetto
More violent than anything Wood ever did, Automatons nevertheless has the kitschy feel and look of something he might have concocted. And I mean that as a compliment.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kyle Smith
Delivers plenty of smart dialogue and devises a number of excellent reasons to photograph his cast in situations that suggest the working title for the film might have been "Women in Underwear."- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kyle Smith
A sort of "Babel" of bonking, 360 gives us much in the way of international anguish, frustrated coupling and longing stares, but there's very little plausibility or genuine emotion in its egregiously contrived story of ardor gone amiss.- New York Post
- Posted Aug 3, 2012
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
With Roth at the helm of a script attributed to Price, there is minimal suspense, audience involvement or coherent social commentary.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kyle Smith
Except for the rock soundtrack, these movies could be silent - and probably should be.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Johnny Oleksinski
Providing a hint of redemption is Edgar-Jones, a naturally vulnerable actress who can turn the shallowest of material into something deep. We like Kya and are with her every step of the way, even though at over two hours there about 50 steps too many.- New York Post
- Posted Jul 14, 2022
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
Ryan's heart is definitely in the right place and his film has good performances and flashes of talent. But, overall, it plays like the world's longest — over two hours -- after-school special.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- New York Post
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
Murphy has fallen back into the comfortable rut of sloppy family comedies that are low on laughs and high on toilet jokes.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Sara Stewart
Predicated almost entirely on the repeated juxtaposition of innocent girlishness and mindless violence, Violet & Daisy could still have been campy fun — instead, it wilts for lack of wit.- New York Post
- Posted Jun 6, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
Tom Arnold plays the fatherly head of a child-prostitution ring and John Malkovich a sympathetic social worker - two clever casting twists that constitute the main interest in the grueling Gardens of the Night.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kyle Smith
If you've seen "Gone With the Wind," you've seen what Love in the Time of Cholera isn't.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
One of those potentially interesting movies that takes its sweet time getting to the point - by which time many audience members will likely have bailed out or dozed off.- New York Post
-
Reviewed by
-
- New York Post
-
-
Reviewed by
Lou Lumenick
In monotonous narration, Rosette rants that the vendors' right to free speech should allow them to obstruct sidewalks, but the portrait of his subculture is so vaguely rendered, it will likely put audiences to sleep rather than change minds.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Megan Lehmann
A skin-deep examination of a shallow lifestyle that draws a conclusion so logical it's almost superfluous.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by