For 16,522 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
56% higher than the average critic
-
6% same as the average critic
-
38% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 2.3 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 63
| Highest review score: | Sand Storm | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Saw VI |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 8,697 out of 16522
-
Mixed: 5,808 out of 16522
-
Negative: 2,017 out of 16522
16522
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
Kenneth Turan
Turns out to be a muddled limp biscuit of a movie, a vampire soap opera that doesn't make much sense even on its own terms.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kenneth Turan
It is hard to say what is more dispiriting about True Romance the movie itself or the fact that someone somewhere is sure to applaud its hollow, dime-store nihilism and smug pseudo-hip posturing as a bright new day in American cinema. [10 Sept 1993]- Los Angeles Times
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kenneth Turan
What's most interesting about this new film is how lacking it is in any of the things, from humor to emotion to halfway decent acting, we might go to a movie for. There's not even enough here to get mad at.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kenneth Turan
A haphazard film about half as sophisticated as the average beer commercial.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gene Seymour
An unintentional parody of every teen movie made in the last five years. Which can be the only rational explanation for making such a mess all over the screen.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jan Stuart
It's the perfect image for a smelly and instantly flushable comedy that telegraphs punch lines in advance like a boorish dinner party guest.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
Mean-spirited vulgarity and homosexual panic.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
Critics are paid to suffer bad art, no matter how icky it is from the start. So all we could do was to Sit! Sit! Sit! Sit! And we did not like it. Not one little bit.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gene Seymour
Even the movie finds itself asking when it'll end. Not soon enough.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kevin Thomas
The result is hopelessly inane, humorless and under-inspired.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kenneth Turan
The filmmaking here is so glacially paced (the final script was only 62 pages for a 100-minute film) and enervating that boredom is the most frequent result.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
The sequel is quite serious, charmless and critic-proof (in fact, it wasn't screened for the media), and it may attract the teenagers who have made the game so popular. [24Nov1997 Pg.10]- Los Angeles Times
-
-
Reviewed by
Kenneth Turan
Not only have bothersome plot changes been made, but the entire tone of the book has been transformed from tension to tongue-in-cheek with dismal results.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kenneth Turan
After sitting through M. Butterfly, you'll wonder why they even bothered to try. [01 Oct 1993]- Los Angeles Times
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kenneth Turan
Even in thriller terms, nothing rings remotely true here, with even the baseball action--including a game that is not called despite enough rain to unnerve Noah--laced with a heavy dose of preposterousness.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Rainer
There's a fundamental lack of human feeling in Beverly Hills Cop III that makes you want to avert your eyes from the people around you when the lights come up. Attending this movie makes you feel like an accomplice to the corruption. [25 May 1994, p.1]- Los Angeles Times
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kenneth Turan
A film that is more listless than funny and could surely use some of the energy that animated both Art Buchwald and Paramount Pictures in the lawsuit surrounding authorship of [Eddie Murphy]'s 1988 "Coming to America." [01 Jul 1992]- Los Angeles Times
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Sheila Benson
James Earl Jones proves that he is probably the only actor in America who can wear the skin of a full-grown lion-jewels in its eyes, its tail in its mouth-over street clothes and not look like a damn fool. But there's not a thing he can do with this flaccid, foolish film. [29 Jun 1988, p.1]- Los Angeles Times
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Sheila Benson
Arm wrestling and hamburger building have been exhausted as backgrounds for movies, so it was probably inevitable that bartending would be next. But nothing quite prepares you for the hamburger that Cocktail makes of an old and relatively honorable profession. [29 Jul 1988, p.14]- Los Angeles Times
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Michael Wilmington
The movie is full of phallic gags about little-bitty guns and crude jokes at physical or emotional infirmities. [17 Nov 1989, p.6]- Los Angeles Times
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Rainer
The animation is of variable quality; the story is a garbled pastiche of "Oliver Twist" and "Little Miss Marker;" the songs, including four by Charles ("Annie") Strouse, are eminently unhummable. [17 Nov 1989]- Los Angeles Times
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
Is it some monstrosity of awfulness, as its lack of advance screening suggested? No, that would imply at least a spark of some kind. This is just an empty summer hodgepodge of stale romantic comedy exchanges, witlessness and lackluster action.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Kevin Thomas
Julien Hernandez's Sex, Politics & Cocktails gives all three a bad name.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kevin Crust
Carl T. Evans' tedious drama Walking on the Sky serves primarily as an acting exercise for its cast and a showcase for its primary location, a scenic Manhattan rooftop.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
As the movie turns into a shrill revenge tragedy, complexity is discarded. The characters might as well be stapled to Popsicle sticks.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Kevin Thomas
It is terrible in every aspect -- wretchedly written, directed with a ham fist (by Matthew Levin) and over-acted.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Betsy Sharkey
The afterlife is not, however, nearly as deadly or as ghastly as the movie itself, an undertaking so tortured that it digs a deeper grave with every passing scene.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Goldstein
An astoundingly bad memory piece that blows its potential dramatic heft at every turn.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by