For 16,522 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
56% higher than the average critic
-
6% same as the average critic
-
38% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 2.3 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 63
| Highest review score: | Sand Storm | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Saw VI |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 8,697 out of 16522
-
Mixed: 5,808 out of 16522
-
Negative: 2,017 out of 16522
16522
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
Voilà ! A genuine tragedy, although not in the Shakespearean sense. A comprehensive list of what's wrong with Romeo & Juliet: Sealed With a Kiss would stretch farther than the unabridged works of William S.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Michael Ordoña
To make a movie this charmless and uninspired takes a certain negligence that is rare among even the most cynical Hollywood moneymaking exercises.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Mark Olsen
The only suitable ending for such a stinker involves a twist-tie and a baggie.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kevin Crust
Its biggest failing -- and the ultimate one for a lightweight entertainment such as this -- is that it's a deadly bore from start to finish.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Mark Olsen
Boll's rampant narcissistic showmanship creates such a bizarre, garish spectacle that it is almost tempting to give him credit for being something of a misunderstood artist after all. Almost, but not quite.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Mark Olsen
The problems that plague the movie land squarely with the writer, director and producer, Deborah Kampmeier, who has crafted a howler of a bad script, shows little affinity for working with actors and displays no visual sense behind the camera.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
A particularly dull and discombobulated affair, shot and acted with all the flair of a basic-cable procedural. Patterson and Mandylor are so wooden that their cat-and-mouse game has all the excitement of watching dust bunnies swirl in an air current.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Mark Olsen
The film is bad -- not good-bad, tacky-bad or fun-bad, just plain awful and nearly unwatchable.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kenneth Turan
Forced, heavy-handed and overdone, it's a pretend serious film that offers crass manipulation in the place where honesty is supposed to be.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Mark Olsen
A shockingly mundane disappointment taken on its own and a deeply misguided refraction of the original.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Betsy Sharkey
It heaps piles of bad, crazy stuff at our feet then walks away. There is no moral to this story, and there's not much comedy either.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Glenn Whipp
Glatzer aims to wring laughter out of this desperation but succeeds only in producing a series of contrived characters and situations that make "The Breakfast Club" look like an unfiltered documentary.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
This predictable teenage take on the 'Fatal Attraction' formula goes from dumb to even dumber.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Kevin Thomas
The Specials is an unfortunate name for a film that's anything but.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kevin Thomas
Despite a premise that's provocative, to say the least, this one's a dud.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Los Angeles Times
-
-
Reviewed by
Gene Seymour
Skip it. Just fill in the blanks and you too can brew the same bland, goopy mixture, right down to such clunker lines as "There is a Santa Claus, Ma. He just doesn't come to Brooklyn anymore."- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Kevin Thomas
The only way his (Benigni's) show-off performance could have a prayer of working would be if the film were released as a silent.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Kenneth Turan
The thrill is definitely gone, leaving a disappointing and unpleasant mess in its place.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kevin Thomas
So laughably awful that it begs to have stones thrown at it; it's a wonder it got made at all.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kevin Thomas
A painfully anemic variation on John Landis' 1981 winner, "An American Werewolf in London." While the original had both wit and poignancy--and an affectionate and knowing tip-of-the-hat to werewolf movies past--this slapdash, silly new edition is so cut-rate it has Luxembourg and Amsterdam standing in for the City of Light.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
Dude, one last thing: If you see my moms and pops, definitely don't tell them about this.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
Johnson does seem to have some psycho-sexual ax to grind amid all this visual and sexual crudity. For instance, women barely figure in the action, with Will taking on various stereotypical feminine attributes. But good luck finding meaning in all this mess.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Kevin Thomas
In comparison to Where the Heart Is, the Wal-Mart commercials seem like cinema verite.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by