For 16,522 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
56% higher than the average critic
-
6% same as the average critic
-
38% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 2.3 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 63
| Highest review score: | Sand Storm | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Saw VI |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 8,697 out of 16522
-
Mixed: 5,808 out of 16522
-
Negative: 2,017 out of 16522
16522
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
- Critic Score
VoilĆ ! A genuine tragedy, although not in the Shakespearean sense. A comprehensive list of what's wrong with Romeo & Juliet: Sealed With a Kiss would stretch farther than the unabridged works of William S.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Michael OrdoƱa
To make a movie this charmless and uninspired takes a certain negligence that is rare among even the most cynical Hollywood moneymaking exercises.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Mark Olsen
The only suitable ending for such a stinker involves a twist-tie and a baggie.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kevin Crust
Its biggest failing -- and the ultimate one for a lightweight entertainment such as this -- is that it's a deadly bore from start to finish.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Mark Olsen
Boll's rampant narcissistic showmanship creates such a bizarre, garish spectacle that it is almost tempting to give him credit for being something of a misunderstood artist after all. Almost, but not quite.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Mark Olsen
The problems that plague the movie land squarely with the writer, director and producer, Deborah Kampmeier, who has crafted a howler of a bad script, shows little affinity for working with actors and displays no visual sense behind the camera.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
A particularly dull and discombobulated affair, shot and acted with all the flair of a basic-cable procedural. Patterson and Mandylor are so wooden that their cat-and-mouse game has all the excitement of watching dust bunnies swirl in an air current.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Mark Olsen
The film is bad -- not good-bad, tacky-bad or fun-bad, just plain awful and nearly unwatchable.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kenneth Turan
Forced, heavy-handed and overdone, it's a pretend serious film that offers crass manipulation in the place where honesty is supposed to be.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Mark Olsen
A shockingly mundane disappointment taken on its own and a deeply misguided refraction of the original.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Betsy Sharkey
It heaps piles of bad, crazy stuff at our feet then walks away. There is no moral to this story, and there's not much comedy either.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Glenn Whipp
Glatzer aims to wring laughter out of this desperation but succeeds only in producing a series of contrived characters and situations that make "The Breakfast Club" look like an unfiltered documentary.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
This predictable teenage take on the 'Fatal Attraction' formula goes from dumb to even dumber.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Kevin Thomas
The Specials is an unfortunate name for a film that's anything but.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kevin Thomas
Despite a premise that's provocative, to say the least, this one's a dud.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Los Angeles Times
-
-
Reviewed by
Gene Seymour
Skip it. Just fill in the blanks and you too can brew the same bland, goopy mixture, right down to such clunker lines as "There is a Santa Claus, Ma. He just doesn't come to Brooklyn anymore."- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Kevin Thomas
The only way his (Benigni's) show-off performance could have a prayer of working would be if the film were released as a silent.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Kenneth Turan
The thrill is definitely gone, leaving a disappointing and unpleasant mess in its place.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kevin Thomas
So laughably awful that it begs to have stones thrown at it; it's a wonder it got made at all.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kevin Thomas
A painfully anemic variation on John Landis' 1981 winner, "An American Werewolf in London." While the original had both wit and poignancy--and an affectionate and knowing tip-of-the-hat to werewolf movies past--this slapdash, silly new edition is so cut-rate it has Luxembourg and Amsterdam standing in for the City of Light.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
Dude, one last thing: If you see my moms and pops, definitely don't tell them about this.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
Johnson does seem to have some psycho-sexual ax to grind amid all this visual and sexual crudity. For instance, women barely figure in the action, with Will taking on various stereotypical feminine attributes. But good luck finding meaning in all this mess.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Kevin Thomas
In comparison to Where the Heart Is, the Wal-Mart commercials seem like cinema verite.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jan Stuart
Lacking a real actress, director Michael Apted is called upon to fudge the facts and make Slim's ordeal as taut as possible. He gets the job done, but the suspense scenes have a generic fright-by-numbers feel that tell us he's wearing his professional hat and knows it.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Kevin Thomas
Way too bleak to be funny, even as a contemporary satire of the battle of the sexes.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
Two Tylenol and a pair of earplugs might be enough to get you through Pokemon 3The Movie.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Kenneth Turan
One of those movies that makes you want to throw up your hands in despair, disgust, or maybe both.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
John Anderson
It's guys like Floyd who make a movie like Whatever It Takes feel like high school. And the rest of the losers make it feel like a movie.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kevin Thomas
Under Alan Cohn's straight-on direction, the film, written by various hands, huffs and puffs mightily just to keep a strenuously labored plot going.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kevin Thomas
The attempt to find humor in mean-spiritedness is way beyond Paris and Fejerman's abilities, and their last-reel attempt to portray Sofia as an ultimately liberating force for her daughters is as contrived as My Mother Likes Women is repellent.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
All of this points to the two major differences between "Mary" and "Lost": Ben Stiller's character in "Mary" was likable (if pathetic), and "Mary" was sporadically funny.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Gene Seymour
Like a dinner-theater version of the "Alien" movies without the good grooming.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Michael Wilmington
It's arguably one of the emptiest, feeblest, most derivative scripts ever made as a major studio movie. There's no need to do a Mad magazine movie parody of this; it's already on the screen.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
I laughed a couple of times, but mostly I was bored out of my mind and not a little depressed.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
John Anderson
A movie made for wrestling fans that makes fun of wrestling fans? That cuts a little too close to the vicarious masochism at the heart of pro wrestling's core constituency. Also, it's not funny.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kenneth Turan
This aggressively stupid film is merely business as usual, a compendium of all the current obsessions and fixations that make so many of these films such unhappy experiences.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kevin Thomas
The "crime" was that it was made in the first place and the "punishment" is having to watch it.- Los Angeles Times
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kenneth Turan
Such a tedious Hollywood farce, so unpleasantly glib and relentlessly shallow, that Pacino's excessive performance is not even the worst thing about it.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kenneth Turan
Seems merely tired and stale, the opposite of fresh, marked by ideas for jokes rather than things that are actually funny. Then, without warning, it goes from inept to complete disaster, sinking from indifferent to fiasco in the blink of an eye.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
See evil. See evil run. Run, evil, run all the way to cable television purgatory.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kevin Crust
A one-gag movie and that one gag isn't funny. Taylor and Lasser are reduced to playing sex-starved Norma Desmonds, and while Friedle and Owen are certainly game, their plan is a waste of everyone's time, especially the audience's.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kevin Thomas
Appalling, shamelessly manipulative and contrived, and totally lacking in conviction.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kenneth Turan
Tiresome, inept farce that's not even a fraction as clever or entertaining as it likes to imagine it is -- a complete waste of time.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kenneth Turan
A numbing and dispiriting experience aimed at the least discriminating parts of the teen-age audience.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gene Seymour
Struggles awkwardly to bring a twist or two to its hoary class-conscious story line, aiming for a subtlety in character development that's smothered by excessive kitsch and kink.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
Robot Stories isn't any good. I don't say this lightly. There's no pleasure in giving new directors bad reviews and it's especially unpleasant when what's wrong with their work isn't a clumsy performance or two, a sagging second act or a repugnant worldview, but a near-total absence of filmmaking talent.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kenneth Turan
Despite a wealth of special effects...this movie is surprisingly inert, more dull than anything else, with little to recommend it on any level.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kevin Thomas
But even Carvey's protean talent can't dent this ponderously unfunny and uninspired comedy. It's hard to imagine anyone older than 10 being diverted by its broad buffoonery, and kids deserve better than this in the first place.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kevin Thomas
It's so bad that you have to wonder whether Tom Green was looking for a project to match last year's "Freddy Got Fingered" -- Green didn't direct this turkey, but it surely is a contender for the bottom of the barrel award for 2002.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
The story leapfrogs abruptly from scene to scene, and it makes such a mockery of narrative logic and continuity that the cast tends to look either baffled (Dorff) or as if they're trying to remain unrecognized.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kenneth Turan
Turns out to be a muddled limp biscuit of a movie, a vampire soap opera that doesn't make much sense even on its own terms.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kenneth Turan
It is hard to say what is more dispiriting about True Romance the movie itself or the fact that someone somewhere is sure to applaud its hollow, dime-store nihilism and smug pseudo-hip posturing as a bright new day in American cinema. [10 Sept 1993]- Los Angeles Times
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kenneth Turan
What's most interesting about this new film is how lacking it is in any of the things, from humor to emotion to halfway decent acting, we might go to a movie for. There's not even enough here to get mad at.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kenneth Turan
A haphazard film about half as sophisticated as the average beer commercial.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gene Seymour
An unintentional parody of every teen movie made in the last five years. Which can be the only rational explanation for making such a mess all over the screen.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jan Stuart
It's the perfect image for a smelly and instantly flushable comedy that telegraphs punch lines in advance like a boorish dinner party guest.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
Mean-spirited vulgarity and homosexual panic.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
Critics are paid to suffer bad art, no matter how icky it is from the start. So all we could do was to Sit! Sit! Sit! Sit! And we did not like it. Not one little bit.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gene Seymour
Even the movie finds itself asking when it'll end. Not soon enough.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kevin Thomas
The result is hopelessly inane, humorless and under-inspired.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kenneth Turan
The filmmaking here is so glacially paced (the final script was only 62 pages for a 100-minute film) and enervating that boredom is the most frequent result.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
The sequel is quite serious, charmless and critic-proof (in fact, it wasn't screened for the media), and it may attract the teenagers who have made the game so popular. [24Nov1997 Pg.10]- Los Angeles Times
-
-
Reviewed by
Kenneth Turan
Not only have bothersome plot changes been made, but the entire tone of the book has been transformed from tension to tongue-in-cheek with dismal results.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kenneth Turan
After sitting through M. Butterfly, you'll wonder why they even bothered to try. [01 Oct 1993]- Los Angeles Times
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kenneth Turan
Even in thriller terms, nothing rings remotely true here, with even the baseball action--including a game that is not called despite enough rain to unnerve Noah--laced with a heavy dose of preposterousness.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Rainer
There's a fundamental lack of human feeling in Beverly Hills Cop III that makes you want to avert your eyes from the people around you when the lights come up. Attending this movie makes you feel like an accomplice to the corruption. [25 May 1994, p.1]- Los Angeles Times
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kenneth Turan
A film that is more listless than funny and could surely use some of the energy that animated both Art Buchwald and Paramount Pictures in the lawsuit surrounding authorship of [Eddie Murphy]'s 1988 "Coming to America." [01 Jul 1992]- Los Angeles Times
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Sheila Benson
James Earl Jones proves that he is probably the only actor in America who can wear the skin of a full-grown lion-jewels in its eyes, its tail in its mouth-over street clothes and not look like a damn fool. But there's not a thing he can do with this flaccid, foolish film. [29 Jun 1988, p.1]- Los Angeles Times
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Sheila Benson
Arm wrestling and hamburger building have been exhausted as backgrounds for movies, so it was probably inevitable that bartending would be next. But nothing quite prepares you for the hamburger that Cocktail makes of an old and relatively honorable profession. [29 Jul 1988, p.14]- Los Angeles Times
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Michael Wilmington
The movie is full of phallic gags about little-bitty guns and crude jokes at physical or emotional infirmities. [17 Nov 1989, p.6]- Los Angeles Times
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Rainer
The animation is of variable quality; the story is a garbled pastiche of "Oliver Twist" and "Little Miss Marker;" the songs, including four by Charles ("Annie") Strouse, are eminently unhummable. [17 Nov 1989]- Los Angeles Times
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
Is it some monstrosity of awfulness, as its lack of advance screening suggested? No, that would imply at least a spark of some kind. This is just an empty summer hodgepodge of stale romantic comedy exchanges, witlessness and lackluster action.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Kevin Thomas
Julien Hernandez's Sex, Politics & Cocktails gives all three a bad name.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Kevin Crust
Carl T. Evans' tedious drama Walking on the Sky serves primarily as an acting exercise for its cast and a showcase for its primary location, a scenic Manhattan rooftop.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
As the movie turns into a shrill revenge tragedy, complexity is discarded. The characters might as well be stapled to Popsicle sticks.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Kevin Thomas
It is terrible in every aspect -- wretchedly written, directed with a ham fist (by Matthew Levin) and over-acted.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Betsy Sharkey
The afterlife is not, however, nearly as deadly or as ghastly as the movie itself, an undertaking so tortured that it digs a deeper grave with every passing scene.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gary Goldstein
An astoundingly bad memory piece that blows its potential dramatic heft at every turn.- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Michael OrdoƱa
For most, there will be no adrenaline rush from fear or thrill, or vicarious release from seeing tormentors tormented; one leaves feeling sad. Sad that this is what "entertainment" has come to. Come on, filmmakers. Can't you do better?- Los Angeles Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Mark Olsen
A film so drained of entertainment or simple humanity it is difficult to relate to as anything other than industrial artifact.- Los Angeles Times
- Posted Feb 19, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Robert Abele
What galls is that for all the perspiration in jazzing up an old yarn, there's not a whiff of originality in how Wirkola engages with the perverse pleasures enshrined by the Grimm brothers, two of their era's shrewdest storytellers.- Los Angeles Times
- Posted Jan 26, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Robert Abele
Inexplicably filmed in a handful of styles - including, bizarrely, obviously processed shots - by cinematographer Christopher Doyle, Passion Play would be midnight-movie fodder if it weren't so drearily wrapped up in its wounded-male aesthetic and a clumsy approach to art-movie moodiness that was abandoned in the '80s.- Los Angeles Times
- Posted May 5, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Los Angeles Times
- Posted Aug 30, 2024
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Sheri Linden
Subscribing to the philosophy that creepy equals interesting, the film contains barely a moment that isn't flat-footed, ludicrous or both.- Los Angeles Times
- Posted May 28, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Amy Nicholson
If you think three months is an impossible amount of time to write and produce a feature film, well, it is.- Los Angeles Times
- Posted Apr 14, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Betsy Sharkey
I know it's early, but Seventh Son may actually be the worst movie of the year. It will most certainly be a contender. The medieval/fantasy/action/drama/romance hits pretty close to a perfect 10 on the egregious scale.- Los Angeles Times
- Posted Feb 5, 2015
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Sheri Linden
With its soft jabs at hypocrisy and band-aid use of voiceover narration, Virginia is an excruciatingly slow train wreck.- Los Angeles Times
- Posted May 17, 2012
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Robert Abele
A near complete exercise in mirthlessness and atonal satire, Cellmates is a sentence, all right.- Los Angeles Times
- Posted May 31, 2012
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Los Angeles Times
- Posted Oct 20, 2012
- Read full review