Christian Science Monitor's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 4,492 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
55% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
43% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 2.1 points higher than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 67
| Highest review score: | 'Round Midnight | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Couples Retreat |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 2,780 out of 4492
-
Mixed: 1,361 out of 4492
-
Negative: 351 out of 4492
4492
movie
reviews
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
Too chilly and distanced to build the emotional impact it would like to have.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
Falls flat on screen, weighed down by far-fetched plot twists.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Christian Science Monitor
- Posted Jan 14, 2012
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Rainer
De Niro, in what amounts to an extended cameo, is radically miscast. That's still no excuse for his nonperformance, which is beyond lackluster.- Christian Science Monitor
- Posted Sep 23, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
Good acting and an effectively claustrophobic mood compensate for a story that doesn't add up to much in the long run.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
The comedy is often crass and crude, but it makes telling points about how much of "race" is more about the words and gestures we use than the actual colors of our skins.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
Harrelson hits just the right sardonic note in this self-mocking crime drama, but look out for grisly touches along the way.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
Like most movies aimed at the younger set, Racing Stripes has easily absorbable lessons to teach: Be yourself, never stop trying if your goal is worthwhile, and so forth.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
The fact remains that some Treks are better than others, and ''The Final Frontier'' doesn't have the surprising warmth of the very best. It's diverting, but forgettable. [19 June 1989, p.15]- Christian Science Monitor
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Rainer
The CGI effects in this film, directed by Brad Peyton, are quite remarkable and help take one’s mind off the cornball disaster-brings-families-together underpinnings.- Christian Science Monitor
- Posted May 29, 2015
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Rainer
The film is a dutiful attempt to convey some of the vehemence of the novel – of the counterculture of the 1960s and early ’70s especially – but McGregor, making his directorial debut, lacks the temperament to do this era justice. He’s an innocent bystander in the melee.- Christian Science Monitor
- Posted Oct 21, 2016
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Rainer
Normally I'd watch Helen Mirren in anything, even if she was just putting out the laundry or reading the phone book. But, given the roteness of her line readings here, it might have been better if the phone book rather than Shakespeare was her text.- Christian Science Monitor
- Posted Dec 10, 2010
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Rainer
This is one of those movies that profits from very low expectations. If you go in expecting something dreadful, be assured: It's only near dreadful.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
Has amusing bits of social satire, but they're crowded out of the stable by lots of bathroom and barnyard humor.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
Lively acting and stylish directing make this an engaging comedy-drama, although its attitude toward guns and violence is disconcertingly romantic.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
Sex, drugs, delirious camera work, and a great deal of noise are the foundations of this aggressively bizarre Australian production. [9 Oct 1987, p.21]- Christian Science Monitor
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
Likable performances, but the story's brash and hyper, though sweet, delivery grows wearing, especially the sexual innuendo.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
It's always hard to predict what Winterbottom will try next, but this experiment isn't worth repeating, the lively concert scenes notwithstanding. Be forewarned that the sexual scenes aren't simulated.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
It delivers all the raunch and ribaldry its designated audience could hope for, but others may find it more deliberately disgusting than effervescently outrageous.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
The story is less original than its setting - it knocks off everything from "Lord of the Flies" to "The Blair Witch Project" -and its unromantic moods may make DiCaprio's countless "Titanic" fans want to swim in the opposite direction.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
This is a quintessential Allen comedy: squirmy relationships, dark Jewish humor, an assumption that everybody in Manhattan has money and a touch of glamour, and -- as with most of Allen's movies since the first few years of his career -- not nearly as many laughs as it gamely tries for.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
The suspense sequences are straight from the standard Hollywood blueprint, and the movie as a whole is so sloppily assembled that it's almost incoherent at times.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
This romantic adventure is corny fun, and it's amusing to hear Sean Connery's elegant Scottish accent jangle against Lorraine Bracco's feisty Bronx twang. The movie is more picturesque than memorable, though. [13 Feb 1992, p.13]- Christian Science Monitor
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Rainer
Braff plays Aidan with easygoing exasperation and Hudson is better than I’ve seen her since “Almost Famous.” As a director, Braff touches on lots of Big Themes: mortality, marriage, fatherhood, the disillusion of dreams. Nothing quite comes to full boil, though.- Christian Science Monitor
- Posted Jul 18, 2014
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Rainer
Director Len Wiseman is good on action, and Patrick Tatopoulus's dystopic production design is within hailing distance of "Blade Runner," his chief influence. But essentially this is a big-screen video game.- Christian Science Monitor
- Posted Aug 3, 2012
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
Although overlong, the picture has a fair measure of jolts and surprises.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
Woo's customary action-film pyrotechnics gather more substance than usual from the implausible but inventive plot, drawn from a Philip K. Dick story.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
The story is slow and corny, but Whitaker gives commendable dignity to his everyday characters, and the acting is emotionally strong as long as the male romantic interest (Connick) isn't around.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by