Christian Science Monitor's Scores

  • Movies
  • TV
For 4,492 reviews, this publication has graded:
  • 55% higher than the average critic
  • 2% same as the average critic
  • 43% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 2.1 points higher than other critics. (0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 67
Highest review score: 100 'Round Midnight
Lowest review score: 0 Couples Retreat
Score distribution:
4492 movie reviews
  1. A movie that has more sap than a pine forest.
  2. Ramis doesn't reach the comic heights of his "Groundhog Day," but the acting is excellent and the screenplay offers some hearty laughs if you can stand bursts of violence and language as foul as a Mafioso's business agenda.
  3. Plays like a warmed-over "Last Tango in Paris," with more explicit sex but a lower level of originality and acting skill.
  4. Danny Boyle's dark comedy has stylishly filmed moments, but overall it's a queasy blend of amusing, pointless, and sometimes quite nasty material.
  5. Too much repetition and an unconvincing finale take a toll on the film's overall effectiveness.
  6. More emphasis on computer-generated gimmickry than on persuasive acting and ideas.
  7. McClelland is a joy to watch, even when the story strains too hard for lovable whimsy, which happens much too often.
  8. Good acting and an effectively claustrophobic mood compensate for a story that doesn't add up to much in the long run.
  9. Egoyan is one of Canada's most ambitious and original filmmakers, but the power of this intricate drama falls short of its aspirations, despite his personal investment in the subject, since he is of Armenian ancestry himself.
  10. The film includes graphic omnisexual and incestuous couplings and has an air of free-floating dread but, especially given its subject matter, it's oddly vacuous – it rarely takes hold emotionally even when its people hit bottom with a resounding thud.
  11. The first hour is eloquent and true. Once the story takes its big turn toward tragedy, though, it becomes predictable and sentimental.
  12. Some scenes of Ulrich Seidl's first fiction feature (he's already a respected documentary maker) are so brutal and degrading that they're hard to watch. Others are highly atmospheric and sometimes quite funny.
  13. Endearingly silly, but nowhere near as original or amusing as Pee-wee's Big Adventure a couple of years ago. [22 Jul 1988, p.19]
    • Christian Science Monitor
  14. Delivers enough action to please Saturday-night crowds, if not the surreal wit that made the first two "Batman" movies, directed by Tim Burton, so entertaining.
  15. All the old Disney trademarks are here, except the wit and surprise that were once the studio's stock in trade. There's little appeal to grownups, but kids should enjoy it.
  16. This tragicomic tale doesn't have the supercharged brilliance of "Run Lola Run," which it occasionally resembles, but it's certainly fast-moving and action fans should enjoy it.
  17. There are a few hilarious moments, and a few more that are foolish and even disgusting. [15 July 1988, Art and Leisure, p.21]
    • Christian Science Monitor
  18. Pat O'Connor directed this likable but unmemorable comedy-drama, which creates some vivid moments without quite managing to flesh out its commonplace characters.
  19. Sir Walter Scott's novel is turned inside-out by Michael Caton-Jones's movie, which transforms the title character from an elusive rogue into a conventional hero who swaggers across the screen from beginning to end.
  20. Best viewed as an oddball career move rather than as a successful movie.
  21. Makes up in solid acting what it lacks in Hollywood-type frills.
  22. Unless you are a Dante scholar, and perhaps not even then, following Inferno is a wild goose chase – without the goose.
  23. The story is unmemorable, but the characters are engaging and their predicaments are all too recognizable.
  24. The psychology of the story is shallow, but the action scenes pack a good visual punch.
  25. Wildly irreverent fantasy.
  26. It exploits post-9/11 anxieties as fodder for goofball gooniness. "Dr. Strangelove" it's not.
  27. For a while, it's like really cool, with lots of energy and stuff, but then it gets like major repetitious, and you wish it was like over, y'know? As if!
  28. It's all energetically filmed, but I miss the cool, modest clarity of the first version. Bigger isn't always better, even at the movies.
  29. With the exception of a few laughs - including a hysterical footsie scene and another that involves Saran Wrap - this one's a no-brainer.
  30. A genuine PG, gentle and wholesome almost all the way through. It's not a great movie, but it should attract family audiences.

Top Trailers