Instead of a Superhero game this one is more of a go here and punch this guy, repeat and move on. Not even die-hard fans like Vaughn would have many nice things to say of this version.

Compared to other sim and tycoon games this one is not as deep which can be a good thing for Xbox players.

I am amazed at what they where able to create here... This game is fun, challenging and addicting.

The replay value is off the map. There is something so cool about playing characters controlled by living, breathing humans. If you haven't tried a persistent online RPG, you're in for an incredible experience.

Primal is more like "Soul Reaver" meets "Ico." And let me tell you, it works.

I got bored about halfway through due to the repetitive nature of the gameplay despite some new improvements and a two-player mode... It would be nice if there were more depth to the strategy and story development.

You might be able to squeeze 20 hours out of this game before you start repeating yourself.

The Xbox version is as close to the original as possible but the sloppy execution of accessing the interface is hampered by the limited control system.

It's really a lot more like real life than you may realize - but if you're playing this game alone on a Friday or Saturday night - this game has got to be a lot more fun than your life.

The textures are so low-res they will give you a headache. The two-player mode is even worse as it compresses the graphics into two halves to facilitate a vertical split screen making everything distorted and elongated, it's like sitting at the front of a Drive-Inn movie screen.

It captures the animated series to a tee and sports the love and care that all of us hope to see heaped on a port that originally appeared on another system (in this case, the PS2).

Anime never looked so good. I was not a big fan of the new-Link look myself but once I experienced the entire Zelda world as presented in this game, I can only commend Nintendo for a job well done.

Much too conservative. In my opinion, the Mercedes license should be dropped in favor of more gameplay freedom. If you don't want to knock your opponent off a mountain road to win a race, that's your problem. I at least want that option.

Personally if you want a solid UFC fighting game, buy the first one since it’s cheaper and overall a better game.

Going through the same obligatory missions again and again may be more than some can tolerate.

The best tip of all is to avoid this one altogether.

If you've got kids, you've got to get this game. It's as well designed as any game out there and offers plenty of non-violent activity.

While the animation isn't bad, what is being animated is old-school graphics which are very out of place on the PS2. It looks a bit like that old game Quix, where you had to draw lines to trap the goblin within 25-per-cent of the screen.

If you've already been-there-done-that, move along - there's nothing to see here. But if you must have Pokemon then just get one of these games. Don't fall prey to Nintendo's cheesy marketing scheme.

Only two kinds of gamers would appreciate this title: beginners and those looking for an easy hack-and-slash party game.

The gameplay is very focused and the controls are tight so there will be no added frustration to the game other than the challenges it offers.

The graphic violence is shocking. The story is captivating and the disturbing scenes are sure to make even hardcore gamers a little queasy.

Unfortunately the trip doesn't last long before you just want to pull over and grab some shuteye.

The great thing about Ultimate Brain Games is that there is enough variety here for all interests. Even if you're not convinced you would make a good chess player, it's always there should you want to take a stab at it.

It lacks features and control. All you really do is make a few choices and let the game play it all out for you. It's like the battle system in an old-school RPG.

Remains true to the character's roots and is aimed exclusively at youngsters that don't realize that Kermit sounded a little different a decade ago.

I didn't find this game particularly challenging but it's still loads of fun.

If any game reviewer on this site even thinks about writing a positive review about this piece of shit, I will fire him on the spot. A positive review will be proof enough of his or her inability to do their job.