What the Bleep!?: Down the Rabbit Hole

Samuel Goldwyn Films | Release Date: February 3, 2006

5.8	USER SCORE Mixed or average reviews based on 20 Ratings

USER RATING DISTRIBUTION

Positive:

Mixed:

Negative:

Review this movie

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.

Check box if your review contains spoilers

0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User score By date Most helpful

M.D.Aug 3, 2006

To all tree hugger morons that believe that their thoughts affect in any way the physical matter outside themselves: If you think enough and meditate a lot about it, maybe you could get your head out of your as*ses. Read a real quantum To all tree hugger morons that believe that their thoughts affect in any way the physical matter outside themselves: If you think enough and meditate a lot about it, maybe you could get your head out of your as*ses. Read a real quantum physics book for a change. You say that the message was not discussed in the reviews? sure, all this new-age, hippie crackpot BS stands for itself, because the "facts" are too strong to be refuted, because physical matter tends to change its chemical properties according to stupid thoughts made by ignorant, egocentric people who think that the universe revolves around themselves enough to change its nature by their power of thought. And the water crystalizes itself differently if I bless it or curse it, according to that japanese "scientific" (Masaru Emoto.) Too bad he doesn't let anyone analyze or reproduce his "experiments" and he did not utilize double blind methodology (do some research) Funnily enough no real scientists are featured in this film, with the exception of David Albert, (and a couple more) who worked with Roger Penrose and in a Popular Science article he stated about this movie that he is "outraged at the final product." The article states that Albert granted the filmmakers a near-four hour interview about quantum mechanics being unrelated to consciousness or spirituality. His interview was then edited and incorporated into the film in a way that misrepresented his views. What gets me mad about this kind of pseudo-scientific shi*t is that it misleads genuinely curious people about science, mixing truths and facts with new age BS so JZ Knight (oh, pardon me, Ramtha, 35,000 year-old warrior spirit from the lost continent of Lemuria, as she states) can sell more spiritual crystals to gullible people and swim in big stashes of money. Spiritual growth, nothing materialistic here. Unlike JZ Knight and her moronic, gullible, ignorant and dishonest colaborators, I'm not making this up. Check Wikipedia article about this movie and look for more sources, and you will understand that this movie should be classified "Fantasy" or "Sci-fi" instead of "documentary" If you're curious about quantum physics, there's lot of real sources in the internet, and plenty of them are simple to read and comprehend, and much more fascinating than this mind dump that gullible idiots call "documentary".… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

IllusivemaN7Feb 24, 2015

This is one of the most pretentious, unorganized and random documentaries made to date. Very little is interesting or informative, the people in this have no clue what they're talking about with the exception of one or two things. You willThis is one of the most pretentious, unorganized and random documentaries made to date. Very little is interesting or informative, the people in this have no clue what they're talking about with the exception of one or two things. You will have NO idea what they're trying to say other than what we actually know about quantum physics. When they aren't talking about that any normal, sober person will likely be asking "What... Are they talking about??"… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

T.H.Feb 8, 2006

A pathetic effort by J.Z. Knight and her followers to try and eke an extra dollar out of you! The first movie was a way to fund the insipid Ramtha cult, this outing is simply

0 of 0 users found this helpful

LukeH.Oct 27, 2006

What the bleep do the filmmakers know...about making a film that isn't a corny, pandering piece of #$% movie with embarassingly pathetic dramatizations and low budget computer graphics? Not much. Am I interested in quantum physics? What the bleep do the filmmakers know...about making a film that isn't a corny, pandering piece of #$% movie with embarassingly pathetic dramatizations and low budget computer graphics? Not much. Am I interested in quantum physics? Sure. Did I turn this thing off before they could get to that data and make me feel like these pretentious sounding talking heads were credible? Yes. I'd rather read a book that gets to the point without all of the really cheesey dressing.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

BryanCUFFDec 19, 2022

The filmmakers misrepresent the meaning of the science they try to use to defend their nonsensical ideas to a laughable degree. the filmmaking is also ugly and cliche'. the film fails on every level.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews