V for Vendetta

9

MikeG.Apr 7, 2006

Very strong movie. Suprisingly, it was more of an intellectual exercise than an action movie or an emotional experience. This is perhaps the lone weakness of the movie - there are a couple of times where a more emotional wallop would have Very strong movie. Suprisingly, it was more of an intellectual exercise than an action movie or an emotional experience. This is perhaps the lone weakness of the movie - there are a couple of times where a more emotional wallop would have moved this movie to a 10. Otherwise, I found myself sucked into the story. Unlike a lot of other futuristic, totalitarian movies, the progression from here (the present) to there (the nightmarish future) was extremely believable.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

martinApr 5, 2006

"V"--vacuous.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

10

DerekP.Apr 5, 2006

A satisfyingly potent mix of classics 1984 and Farenheit 451, with a touch of Equilibrium. A thinking movie I will have to watch on DVD so I can catch all the details and famous quotes.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

JeffL.Apr 3, 2006

Crazily ambitious, overstuffed, yet utterly compelling mixture of comic book action, dystopian sci-fi, and left-wing agitprop set in a near-future when Britain is once again the world's preeminent superpower after the United Crazily ambitious, overstuffed, yet utterly compelling mixture of comic book action, dystopian sci-fi, and left-wing agitprop set in a near-future when Britain is once again the world's preeminent superpower after the United States' failed foreign policies and a disastrous war in the Middle East (where do they get this stuff???) have left it in a state of civil war. This future Britain is run with an iron fist by a dictator (John Hurt) who uses religious bigotry, homophobia, and fear of terrorism to hold sway over the populace, except for a mysterious masked avenger known only as V (Hugo Weaving), who sets out on a violent campaign against the powers that be, including a plot to blow up Parliament. Natalie Portman (shaved head, Brit accent, and all) is excellent as Evey, reporter for a right-wing TV network, who is saved by V then drafted into his plans. The script by the Wachowski Brothers (The Matrix), based on a graphic novel by Alan Moore (From Hell), has many influences; 1984, of course, but also Alphaville, Fahrenheit 451, Phantom of the Opera, Batman, and The Count of Monte Cristo (the Robert Donat version is V's favorite film) among others. What's particularly ballsy here is how this especially nasty future is simply a logical extension of all the worst elements of today's real-life political climate (from Fox News to bird flu paranoia), and how the hero of a big-budget post-9/11 mass entertainment is essentially a sympathetic terrorist. The vivid art direction, heavily influenced by Nazi and Communist iconography, is Oscar-worthy, and the supporting cast is aces, including Stephen Rea as a detective, Stephen Fry as a quietly rebellious gay man, and Roger Allam as a venom-spewing TV host so vile and reactionary he makes Rush, Hannity, and "Falafel Guy" O'Reilly seem measured and reasonable by comparison. The film is overlong and over-the-top in both good and bad ways, but it's kind of hard to complain too loudly about a movie that has too MANY ideas at a time when most wannabe thrillers (Firewall, anyone?) have none whatsoever.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

MarkS.Apr 3, 2006

What a disappointment! Part rambling, babbling political rally drivel, mixed with Natalie Portman dealing with the affections of older men (yuck). Earth to Wachowski brothers!: if you're going to have a man with a British accent, What a disappointment! Part rambling, babbling political rally drivel, mixed with Natalie Portman dealing with the affections of older men (yuck). Earth to Wachowski brothers!: if you're going to have a man with a British accent, wearing a mask, give numerous monologues, please tone down the background music so we might be able to make it all out.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

9

CodyK.Apr 3, 2006

This was a great movie. Lots of symbology used in it. Though sadly a lot of the symbolism will go over most peoples heads. Lots of good references to todays world as well. Though be warned it doesn't take too kindly to religious This was a great movie. Lots of symbology used in it. Though sadly a lot of the symbolism will go over most peoples heads. Lots of good references to todays world as well. Though be warned it doesn't take too kindly to religious extremes, especially Christian.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

AlexApr 1, 2006

i have yet to see a better, more intruiging movie to date. V for Vendetta is now my #1 favorite movie not because of the action or the good acting, but because of how real this movie seemed. V for Vendetta was one of those movies that felt i have yet to see a better, more intruiging movie to date. V for Vendetta is now my #1 favorite movie not because of the action or the good acting, but because of how real this movie seemed. V for Vendetta was one of those movies that felt like it could very well happen. and, if you look closely at history, it sort of all has already happened. its definitely not one of those non-stop action flicks, but the action it does have is well done, with some very nice special effects. i HIGHLY recommend it. however: don't go into this movie expecting to understand every aspect. history buffs will pick up on a lot of the symbolizms, but the casual movie goer might not enjoy this one as much.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

AdamP.Apr 1, 2006

V for Vendetta is a killer movie- far too awesome at nearly two and a half hours, with round, clean visuals, smooth editing and awareness of urgency. But as a political work, it's something else - light-handed and flat-out smart.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

DanielC.Apr 1, 2006

Wow, just wow. This piece of firery entetainment did the impossible and gave a rousing action story, deep and meaningful characters and a point to their message, all in two hours. This movie grabs it's story with both hands, and never Wow, just wow. This piece of firery entetainment did the impossible and gave a rousing action story, deep and meaningful characters and a point to their message, all in two hours. This movie grabs it's story with both hands, and never lets back. Although the performances are not outstanding, the directors have created a well following plot that gives justice to the original, yet still packs a punch. V for Vendetta is relevant today as it has always been, and V's monologues are humourous if not disconcerning. The detective work was also done to prefection, making the reach to the bottom of the truth so satisfying and entertaining. I ask the people moaning about this movie: What is there to complain about? This are ideas that PRECEDE 9/11 but still resonate today. If you went here seeking an action movie or a love scene, you are at the wrong place, instead you saw an inspired action piece with some political messages we should all hear. One tip: Watch and read the original first.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

RyanMar 31, 2006

Boring, long, and yet again proof that the Wachowski's are terrible writters who somehow fluked into the first Matrix movie. If you like little to no action, and dialog that is all exposition then this... still would be a bad movie.

0 of 3 users found this helpful

9

KeithB.Mar 31, 2006

While it doesn't follow the comic to a T, most of what was left out was due to time. There were a few changes, although some were fairly big. All in all, it does remain fairly faithful, and still makes for a great movie. One of my While it doesn't follow the comic to a T, most of what was left out was due to time. There were a few changes, although some were fairly big. All in all, it does remain fairly faithful, and still makes for a great movie. One of my favorite comic movies to date. For those complaining about it not being new, and just is rehashing things from a post 9/11 world, well, the story was around way before hand. Alan Moore started Writing it in 1983, and it was released in comic form in 1988, plus there had been people trying to make a movie of it for quite a few years (the same with Moore's Watchmen). The events of 9/11 probably delayed the production of this movie, not inspired it! Evey and V didn't really have a traditional love affair as some are pushing. It was more emotional that lust, due to the ideals V has. Some of the people rating totally didn't undersand that (such as one saying "Portman's character finds the burnt dude in the mask sexy? C'mon!"). If you've read the comic, and it was also brought up in the movie, for a while she was thinking V was her father! I don't know about you, but people typically don't lust after father figures [Ed- Apparantly never watched or heard of Phantom of the Opera].… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

IanI.Mar 31, 2006

V for Vendetta was a great film, it wasn

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

NKMar 30, 2006

Very dissapointed, most of the Anti-Bush down with America crowd will resonate with it and give it high marks, I personally thought it was rubbish, I was nodding off. One or two CGI scenes that were done well, the rest was just pretty poor. Very dissapointed, most of the Anti-Bush down with America crowd will resonate with it and give it high marks, I personally thought it was rubbish, I was nodding off. One or two CGI scenes that were done well, the rest was just pretty poor. Too bad, I was hoping it would be much better.… Expand

0 of 5 users found this helpful

6

DavidS.Mar 29, 2006

I can't understand people who call this movie "captivating and philisophic". The ideas in this movie are the current pop culture standard, and are terribly unoriginal and boring. I already know that America is fed government initiated I can't understand people who call this movie "captivating and philisophic". The ideas in this movie are the current pop culture standard, and are terribly unoriginal and boring. I already know that America is fed government initiated fear, and that CNN feeds me paranoid garbage. Hello! did anybody see Faranheit 911! I'm sick of movies pretending to be original and deep when in fact they're just the opposite. If this movie was made before Sept 11. and before everyone saw Faranheit 911 and instantly became world political experts, then I'd say this movie had some original ideas. Unfortunately, it's just another movie glorifying what everyone already knows! You'd think that despite these shortcomings the movie might provide some good action sequences, or some resembelance of a plot. NEGATIVE! The movie plods along at a snail's pace. The quasi love story isn't believable,(Portman's character finds the burnt dude in the mask sexy?C'mon!) and there's only one action scene at the end involving knives that I can clearly recount. Overall, this movie is a complete waste of money and more importantly a waste of your time!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

HadenD.Mar 28, 2006

didnt have "the edge" it needed, with no edge it was just compounded psychobable with excellent performances by both leads, never seen natalie more dramatic.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

EikeF.Mar 28, 2006

It goes without saying that the action scenes created by the Wachowski brothers are phenomenal. The dialogue is captivating and, as in the matrix, deeply existenial and philosophic. The references to our current political situation are It goes without saying that the action scenes created by the Wachowski brothers are phenomenal. The dialogue is captivating and, as in the matrix, deeply existenial and philosophic. The references to our current political situation are ample, add depth, but are deeply disturbing. Anyone on the Chistian Right will be deeply offended.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JoséC.Mar 28, 2006

Excellent movie! My best movie experience in a long while. It really makes you think and make you realize that many things presented in this movie are already happening reflected in the claims of some critics that the producers of this movie Excellent movie! My best movie experience in a long while. It really makes you think and make you realize that many things presented in this movie are already happening reflected in the claims of some critics that the producers of this movie are siding with the terrorists...… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

ElliotN>Mar 27, 2006

I thought this was a great movie overall. I have read the Graphic Novel recently and found that some minor details were changed, but very few of them put me off. The graphic novel is a little bit anticlimatic, but the movie is not.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

TottoBoomMar 27, 2006

Repetitive, slow, incoherent...I wanted go to sleep or better read a book.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

8

MitchellF.Mar 27, 2006

I could go on with a lengthy speach about this movie, but after reading other peoples reviews, I feel that i cant do this movie justice without someone else contradicting my opinion about how this movie portrayed "politics". Its a freaking I could go on with a lengthy speach about this movie, but after reading other peoples reviews, I feel that i cant do this movie justice without someone else contradicting my opinion about how this movie portrayed "politics". Its a freaking movie, for god sakes who cares how the politics are handled in the future of a COMIC BOOK! Just go see the movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

MattMar 26, 2006

It was a good movie, all in all. Could have used a little bit more action at times, and sometimes the plot got a little bit messy, but it was still enjoyable. I would probably give it an 8.5 to be specific, but im feeling generous and rounding up.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

AdanT.Mar 26, 2006

A stunning achievement, not only for Natalie Portman, but for all movies with a politcal premise...Gosh it's great.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

GiuseppeA.Mar 26, 2006

Excellent adaptation of the comic book. This movie proves that Hollywood can be still fed from marvel / dc / vertigo even after milestones like Batman Begins and Sin City. Great job also from the acting perspective. Will go to seethe again Excellent adaptation of the comic book. This movie proves that Hollywood can be still fed from marvel / dc / vertigo even after milestones like Batman Begins and Sin City. Great job also from the acting perspective. Will go to seethe again this coming weekend .. it deserves it ! Peace .. ehm ,, I mean ... V !!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

EricS.Mar 26, 2006

After hearing Alan Moore's (the writer of the graphic novel) complaints, I came into this movie expecting a typical, watered-down Hollywood flick. Although there were some changes from the original source material, "V for Vendetta" was After hearing Alan Moore's (the writer of the graphic novel) complaints, I came into this movie expecting a typical, watered-down Hollywood flick. Although there were some changes from the original source material, "V for Vendetta" was still a great, though-provoking film that didn't pull any punches. Whether you agree with the politics or not (which should by no means determine your opinion of the movie), you can't deny that the directors told an exciting and intelligent story. All this would have been for nothing if not for the great acting. Nataly Portman proved once again that "Star Wars" doesn't represent her acting abilities, and deserves a lot of credit for making a fully masked character seem human. The only flaws were in the over-simplifying of certain characters and situations. For example, the "evil" portrayal of the government was taken to the extreme, making it less believable that they could have gained the love of so many people. In the graphic novel, the high chancellor was a multi-dimensional character who was made sympathetic by his isolation and inability to relate to humans. The film should have followed that example, instead of making him your typical raving lunatic. Additionally, the whole scene at the end with everyone in a Guy Fawkes mask was a little too over the top. It was like the directors didn't trust the viewers to understand the spreading of V's ideal if they weren't bludgeoned over the head with it. However, despite those flaws "V for Vendetta" was still a great movie that goes above and beyond typical Hollywood films. Put aside your politics and preconceived notions and judge it on its own merits. You may not agree with the political message, but there is no denying that "V for Vendetta" is both thought provoking, and exceptionally well crafted.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

TylerD.Mar 26, 2006

Simply amazing. The greatest piece of film I've ever seen. The action sequences are some of the best you'll see in a movie like this, and the story is incredible. How can someone give this any less than a 9/10. It was just amazing.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

TamaraC.Mar 26, 2006

This is one of the most political, thought-provoking, well-thought movies that I have seen. If you are looking to be spoon-fed an trite action-movie, then this may not be for you. But, if you want to be overwhelmed by political comments, This is one of the most political, thought-provoking, well-thought movies that I have seen. If you are looking to be spoon-fed an trite action-movie, then this may not be for you. But, if you want to be overwhelmed by political comments, symbolism and thought-provoking notiions, then this is the movie of a life-time. I think that this will be a cult classic for many many years! I now know how my family, friends and I will be dressing for halloween this year!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

CharlieW.Mar 26, 2006

It is rare that you find a movie like this that blends mind-bending action and fight scenes with such tremendous depth and such an interesting and powerful story. How the critics gave this movie less than ninety baffles me.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

AdamX.Mar 26, 2006

Horrible, horrible movie. Everything in it seemed to be so poorly executed it was quite embarrassing and cringe worthy to witness. It wasn't even engaging enough to be a brainless entertainment flick, just boring pacing, plot, direction Horrible, horrible movie. Everything in it seemed to be so poorly executed it was quite embarrassing and cringe worthy to witness. It wasn't even engaging enough to be a brainless entertainment flick, just boring pacing, plot, direction and acting. The good responses this film has gotten astounds and confuses me.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

9

DavidC.Mar 26, 2006

I thought this was a thought provoking movie with plenty of action and humor to go around. Audiences will either love it or hate it in the first 2 minutes. If you enjoyed fight club then I highly recommend this film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

NathanFireMar 26, 2006

In the vein of Orwell's 1984. If you have any respect for that book's message you will feel this film's depth.
If you didnt like V because you felt it was poking at your political beliefs then you must have some seriouslyIn the vein of Orwell's 1984. If you have any respect for that book's message you will feel this film's depth.
If you didnt like V because you felt it was poking at your political beliefs then you must have some seriously sensitive and messed up allegiances to certain fascist hate groups. This is entertainment people, take a breath and watch it. I applaud the film for actually going against the grain of so much hollywood drivel. It dares to raise quesitons! Vital questions. But maybe you would rather not leave your Fox News bubble. If you are ready to take the red pill go get enlightened at democracynow.org… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

NathanF.Mar 26, 2006

Im not saying Hugo Weaving didn't do a good V or that Natalie Portman cant act all those features were what might this movie okay instead of lying in a gutter what i'm concerned about is the story. what were they thinking what kind Im not saying Hugo Weaving didn't do a good V or that Natalie Portman cant act all those features were what might this movie okay instead of lying in a gutter what i'm concerned about is the story. what were they thinking what kind of government what do that besides comunists and who does V think he is blowing up random monuments to show he means business I'm sorry but it's a load of worthless action... NOTE: do not see this movie unless you enjoy raw action then go ahead.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

10

BrandonM.Mar 26, 2006

Awesome movie! It makes you think about everything and you will not know all the answers until the end of the movie truly bringing it full circle. I've heard the arguments about V being a terrorist, think about this in the US what did Awesome movie! It makes you think about everything and you will not know all the answers until the end of the movie truly bringing it full circle. I've heard the arguments about V being a terrorist, think about this in the US what did they do when they were oppressed back in 1776? Thats right they became terrorists in a sense but they did not try to stamper or control the ideas of other countries like what happened on 9-11. This is a story about citizens taking back their rights from an opressive government and it beheave you to keep this in mind when you see it "What would I do if a government told me what I can and can not do while they do it all?"… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

MartinS.Mar 26, 2006

I was very disappointed. They try to make it seem relevent to world events today, and that's its downfall. It does it so badly.

0 of 7 users found this helpful

10

SmithJ.Mar 26, 2006

Amazing movie. Amazingly different and refreshing. I wish there would be more movies like this. It's a long movie but not a boring in anyway, even with not that much action. But when the action kicks in its really satisfying. Bad guys Amazing movie. Amazingly different and refreshing. I wish there would be more movies like this. It's a long movie but not a boring in anyway, even with not that much action. But when the action kicks in its really satisfying. Bad guys really are bad guys in this movie, and this movie reminds you how evil humans can be against each other. People should not hate this movie just because of its message or lack there of.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

MattB.Mar 25, 2006

This film is pedantic and takes itself way too seriously and the effect was to make it unintentionally humorous. The writers thought the audience would be too stupid to see the self-inherent evils of a fascist regime, so they needed to This film is pedantic and takes itself way too seriously and the effect was to make it unintentionally humorous. The writers thought the audience would be too stupid to see the self-inherent evils of a fascist regime, so they needed to manipulate us by portraying them as ugly, shifty-eyed rapists. It would have been more thought provoking and real had they been portrayed as charasmatic or, better yet, like your co-worker or next door neighbor, the average Joe. What a cliche that the antagonists were motivated, really, by power and not their ideology. True Belivers are always the most freightening. The writing was hackneyed and overly Verbose in an apparent attempt to give the film some sort of legitimacy through seeming literary. Thick melodrama made it impossible to empathize with the characters or care what happened to them. Five minutes into the film I had a vision of the writers hunched over the 'V' section of Webster's frantically trying to shoehorn every word into a coherent sentence. What exactly is the film's message supposed to be? Buildings can be blown up without killing innocents but instead be capped with an uplifting fireworks finale? Replacing the devastation caused by blowing up a building with a tame 4th of July display is a bone chilling piece of apologist propaganda. Anyone who thinks this film blurs the line between terrorists and 'freedom fighters' is a few cards short of a full deck. The fact that the writers needed to portray England as some sort of cartoonish neo-Nazi dictatorship to gride their political ax proves the lameness of their position. However, Natalie Portman does a nice job despite the poor script. Stephen Rea was the highlight of the film.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

6

JimboH.Mar 25, 2006

The bottom line to any movie is how entertaining it is and for me, I felt downright bored at times due to the "talking head" syndrome this movie displays. If anything they wrote the plot around the message they wanted to get across. Its good The bottom line to any movie is how entertaining it is and for me, I felt downright bored at times due to the "talking head" syndrome this movie displays. If anything they wrote the plot around the message they wanted to get across. Its good but could of been a lot better- it feels a little rushed. I actually saw 3 people walk out about 20 minutes in because of how politically biased this movie is. If you liked Farenheit 911 then you'll probably like this one. One thing does sum up this movie though: confused. Sometimes its just preaching. Other times its action. Other times it contradicts itself. For example, the future is very nazi-ish (one flag shown is american/british/with a swashtika on it). yet the government also resembles Iraq under Saddam Hussein. The bad guys are the conservatives governing under fear, and they blame things on religious extremists when its really the government to blame. There are also mass graves. Sorta like things that happened in Iraq. The logo for the new-future british government is a cross with an extra line across the t, and the Quaran is banned to the point you'll be executed if you have one. This movie will be very dated very quickly. Remember when some kids died because of cops in France and people rioted because of it? You probably wont a few years from now. If this movie had a more realistic plot with more realistic characters rather than self-promoting its own ideals I'd add 3 more points to the rating. For most people who dont disect movies like I do though, this should be a decent one to watch for it gives at least some good conversation material later on. Sorry this review is so jumpy, there is too much to comment about in such a short block.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

BillT.Mar 25, 2006

"Governments should be afraid of their people"? Hmmm. Yeah, maybe in Saudi Arabia, North Korea, Cuba, etc. But in the US & the UK, the government IS the people. You don't like the government? vote them out. No need to blow up the "Governments should be afraid of their people"? Hmmm. Yeah, maybe in Saudi Arabia, North Korea, Cuba, etc. But in the US & the UK, the government IS the people. You don't like the government? vote them out. No need to blow up the Capitol Building or Parliament. Just go freakin' vote, you idots!! This movie should have been set in Saudi Arabia or a country that truly puts down its people. But the UK and the US??? What next, update "Mommie Dearest" with Mother Teresa in the lead role?? It didn't make logical sense to me.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful

9

RickyP.Mar 25, 2006

This was a terriffic film. It makes you think, but it's not boring, and the British actors lend some heft to anything they are involved in. The critics giving this bad score or saying it was incoherent (ahem, wall street journal) are This was a terriffic film. It makes you think, but it's not boring, and the British actors lend some heft to anything they are involved in. The critics giving this bad score or saying it was incoherent (ahem, wall street journal) are most likely republicans or american apologists. Hopefully a lot of people (especially younger folks) will see this and pay attention to what it says.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

LittleMickeyMar 25, 2006

Just so we are clear, this film neither glorifies terorism nor does it say democracy is bad. It simply asks sensible questions; like what powers should governments have? and what is the difference between a terrorist and a freedom fighter? Just so we are clear, this film neither glorifies terorism nor does it say democracy is bad. It simply asks sensible questions; like what powers should governments have? and what is the difference between a terrorist and a freedom fighter? Questions in the current global environment anyone worth their salt should be aking themselves. Anyway, how can a film whos tagline is 'people should not be affraid of their governments, governments should be afraid of thier people' be anti-democracy etc, etc? However even though this film challenges its audience to ask itself questions, and even though Hugo Weaving was exceptional, it wasn't the most entertaining film i've seen and its not as though other sources haven't challenged us to ask these questions before, hence the 7.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

LisaJoN.Mar 25, 2006

I see some 75 movies a year in theatres and V for Vendetta is by far the most exhilerating and compelling piece of movie magic I have seen in at least the past year. The acting was incredible and pitch-perfect and the visuals were stunning. I see some 75 movies a year in theatres and V for Vendetta is by far the most exhilerating and compelling piece of movie magic I have seen in at least the past year. The acting was incredible and pitch-perfect and the visuals were stunning. The fact that V was carrying out his personal vendetta while trying to save his country only made him all the more human. As excelent example as I have ever seen of Margaret Mead's statement to never doubt that a small group of committed and concerned citizens can change the world, in fact is is the only thing that ever has. V and Elie were those citizens.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

MariaA.Mar 25, 2006

If you're not into thinking, this moving isn't for you. While watching this moving, you have a choice: to view it as a movie version of a comic book (as you would Superman or Batman or Spiderman) or to view it as a chilling If you're not into thinking, this moving isn't for you. While watching this moving, you have a choice: to view it as a movie version of a comic book (as you would Superman or Batman or Spiderman) or to view it as a chilling commentary on the American experience related to 9/11 and the Bush Administration. When will we stop allowing fear to be used to control us? "The only thing to fear is fear itself."… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

DuhhhhMar 25, 2006

WOW, I have not seen a movie this great in a long time. Usually when I walk into a movie expecting it to be an action packed blockbuster, and its not.... I usually leave disappointed. Not in this case. The story is incredible, the few but WOW, I have not seen a movie this great in a long time. Usually when I walk into a movie expecting it to be an action packed blockbuster, and its not.... I usually leave disappointed. Not in this case. The story is incredible, the few but powerful action scenes are incredible, and Hugo Weaving as V..... I don't think this movie could've been done without him. I loved him as Mr. Smith but... this gives a new meaning to acting. How anyone can show expression and emotion without facial movement is beyond me, but Weaving does it...and it is incredible. Great Job to the brothers, great job to Weaving, and great job to Natalie Portman, as this is going down as one of my all time favorite movies. FYI, it is political, but its not hurting anybody though The government is a dictorial leadership and V is a "terrorist". Everyone has a different perspective on this aspect. I see it this way, when America broke free and revolted against England, it was heroic and for the good of a free nation. When V Terrorizes the government and sucks the people into his beliefs against a monarchy.... what is the difference, its not a terrorist act if it leads to a happy ending right. Anything that is heroic in our history books was just a glorified terrorist act that became a fight for our rights. Great Movie, Great Action, Great Acting. Favorite movie of the year so go see it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

AliaZ.A.Mar 24, 2006

With so much happening around the world today, the timing is perfect for this movie to raise such questions as to appear risky and controversial. Combine that with powerful performance by the cast and great presentation, the result is a With so much happening around the world today, the timing is perfect for this movie to raise such questions as to appear risky and controversial. Combine that with powerful performance by the cast and great presentation, the result is a charming, thoughtful movie, just enough to provoke the general audience as well as entertain.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

S.R.Mar 24, 2006

Strong statement about society's limited ability to recognize the process of corruption; resistance and martyrs impact on familly members; well dramatized! Identification with Evey and the Security Chief makes this movie commanding.Strong statement about society's limited ability to recognize the process of corruption; resistance and martyrs impact on familly members; well dramatized! Identification with Evey and the Security Chief makes this movie commanding. Outstanding...Portman takes the center and carries it well!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

ScottG.Mar 24, 2006

This was an outstanding movie. It's been 20 years (or seems that way) since I read the graphic novel, so I'd forgotten the details of the story. Powerful stuff.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

GodComplexMar 24, 2006

Hey Kel R.... You do realize this is a movie right? Go suck George Bush off some where else. Comparing this movie to the Democrates is like comparing Brokeback Mt. to the Republicans. Anyways it's a descent film folks. It's entertaining.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

TomOlsenMar 24, 2006

A visual treat, and the supporting cast is great. I liked Portman as the heroine, but Weaving always behind the mask got tedious. As for the our-culture-is-a-gulag politics, it's a leftist agi-prop fantasy. But I believe that movieA visual treat, and the supporting cast is great. I liked Portman as the heroine, but Weaving always behind the mask got tedious. As for the our-culture-is-a-gulag politics, it's a leftist agi-prop fantasy. But I believe that movie writers hate GWB that much... Lord knows there's plenty of supporting evidence all around us.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

TimothyD.Mar 24, 2006

Is it perfect? No. Is it compelling, dynamic storytelling (even when it lapsed into bombast or too much talk)? Yes. The few passages that didn't keep me riveted were more interesting than most of the product currently coming out of Is it perfect? No. Is it compelling, dynamic storytelling (even when it lapsed into bombast or too much talk)? Yes. The few passages that didn't keep me riveted were more interesting than most of the product currently coming out of Hollywood (IMHO). Great work by Natalie Portman, Hugo Weaving and Steven Rea.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

WongitMar 24, 2006

I didnt know what to expect with this film, i did not however expect to see a terrible film...which is exactly what i got. boring. pure boredom is what i got out of this movie.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

9

SaraMar 24, 2006

Thought the comic is better, I have to say I was extremly impressed with the film. Very moving, just like the book; I wept openly in the theater.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

KatherineMar 24, 2006

This was very good film! Unless you are a ultra conservative republican who would have great troubles understanding this film, this was very well written movie about a deeply flawed Hero adn heroine in a deeply flawed time. If,however, you This was very good film! Unless you are a ultra conservative republican who would have great troubles understanding this film, this was very well written movie about a deeply flawed Hero adn heroine in a deeply flawed time. If,however, you are a moderate you will truly enjoy this film. It highlights the dangers of 'over-government', media manipulation, the problem of defining a terorist and many other issues very real and pertintant to today's world. I have read many review about this film harping on it 'glorifying terrorism' and for those who think it does, they have missed the points of the film altogether. The hero is a deeply flawed almost anti-hero who takes revenge on those who have destroyed his life and killed many that he has considered comrades by their circumstance being the same as his own. His revenge is mixed with his ideas of changing the world and become convoluted beggintg the question to be asked on what is justice and what is revenge and whether murder is justified. I have seen other reviewers saying it is attacking America, and yet the story is based in England about an English government. Yes, America is mentioned but it is not the focus. Very clearly, and on many occasions the storyline follows the basic premise: the people get the government they deserve either by action or inaction. The hero belives he will be able to stir the country to make choices again by removing the fear that has paralyzed them. A fantastic film that deserves discussion.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

KelR.Mar 24, 2006

WARNING: This movie is a diabolically conceived slew of hate propoganda, don't be fooled. Does terrorism seem cool to you? Yet, we see the ultra left, the so called champions of peace, poison the minds of young americans (who is the WARNING: This movie is a diabolically conceived slew of hate propoganda, don't be fooled. Does terrorism seem cool to you? Yet, we see the ultra left, the so called champions of peace, poison the minds of young americans (who is the target audience) with this tripe, glorifying evil.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

5

MichaelD.Mar 24, 2006

Entertaining? Yes. Smart? No. I was hoping that this movie would mix the two, but alas, it didn't. I'm glad I saw it, because it was a feast for the eyes. But not for the brain. It's thoughts are actually quite shallow, though Entertaining? Yes. Smart? No. I was hoping that this movie would mix the two, but alas, it didn't. I'm glad I saw it, because it was a feast for the eyes. But not for the brain. It's thoughts are actually quite shallow, though at times exciting. If you want to see it, watch it in the theatre, but I wouldn't waste the time renting it unless you have a really sweet sound system and TV.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

9

MeyaC.Mar 24, 2006

This movie is really good. i've read the comic book, and that was obviously better, but the film is great in its own right. this is the best thing i've seen in a long time, and it makes you think about a lot of things that'sThis movie is really good. i've read the comic book, and that was obviously better, but the film is great in its own right. this is the best thing i've seen in a long time, and it makes you think about a lot of things that's going on right now. yes, it may be controversial because it talks about terrorists and maybe even glorifying them, but hello, it's a film. it's fiction. it's only a portrayal of what alan moore (or whoever wrote the script) feels or thinks or whatever. i just want to complain about a few things: where was the vicious cabaret? or rose almond? i wish they concentrated a bit more on the outside characters and made it an ensemble drama (maybe there wasn't enough time, iunno)more than concentrating on natalie portman's iffy character. i never really liked evey anyway, but maybe that's just my opinion. watch it. its compelling stuff.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

AndrewM.Mar 23, 2006

Watered down Hollywood crap. Read the comic book.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

EuroMar 23, 2006

I cant believe there are people that actually admire this movie. Its the same people that probably never took a political science class or read a book about history of politics. It over simplifies a totalitarian regime and makes a terrorist I cant believe there are people that actually admire this movie. Its the same people that probably never took a political science class or read a book about history of politics. It over simplifies a totalitarian regime and makes a terrorist look like a hero. If you can make money with such crap..says a lot about the majority of people.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

6

DanB.Mar 23, 2006

Kind of uncomfortable with the film taking a piss at 'terrorists' as if they're not real. Also, I think the movie might come off like it's msg is "vigilante mass destruction is okay if the government's really Kind of uncomfortable with the film taking a piss at 'terrorists' as if they're not real. Also, I think the movie might come off like it's msg is "vigilante mass destruction is okay if the government's really *really* bad"... but then like, would it be okay for some dissident to blow up a palace in Saudi Arabia? Or for some masked dude to blow up half of Pyonyang? Would that be 'okay'? I dunno. All that said, the movie itself -- aside from a few digressions into sap/cheez -- is pretty darn tootin', and, having seen it on an IMAX screen, I must say that, Natalie Portman's face, 8 stories tall, is wonderful.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

JillJ.Mar 23, 2006

I cannot believe the good reviews this movie has gotten. It ignores the interesting characters (the bad guys) and never tells us how in the world V does everything he does. That would have been more interesting. Poor Natalie Portman, either I cannot believe the good reviews this movie has gotten. It ignores the interesting characters (the bad guys) and never tells us how in the world V does everything he does. That would have been more interesting. Poor Natalie Portman, either looking scared or lost. Stating the obvious in line after line. We spend much time on back stories of people we do not care about - their fate is sealed.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

9

GeorgeM.Mar 23, 2006

This is a terrific film released into a challenging time. Bravo to the producers and Warner Bros. for having the guts to release it. The safe money is on the tried and tame and this is not what you will see here. You will leave the theater This is a terrific film released into a challenging time. Bravo to the producers and Warner Bros. for having the guts to release it. The safe money is on the tried and tame and this is not what you will see here. You will leave the theater with a desire to talk about the ideas and images presented.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

SamerK.Mar 23, 2006

I don't like action movies,but liked the first Matrix film as well as Batman begins. I saw this film in the hope that it may be similar to the films mentioned, and was not disappointed. Visually, moreover, it is nothing short of delicious.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

ChadS.Mar 22, 2006

In the battle of allegorical movies about our current administration, I think V for "The Village" wins, but Natalie Portman's bald head and John Hurt's role reversal(in reference to the Orwell novel, and the Bush-hatin' doc In the battle of allegorical movies about our current administration, I think V for "The Village" wins, but Natalie Portman's bald head and John Hurt's role reversal(in reference to the Orwell novel, and the Bush-hatin' doc "Orwell Rolls in his Grave") entertained me enough to ignore the occasional bombast of its politics. Hurt, in imitation of the fuhrer, reminded me of Robert F. Kennedy's appearance of Hannity and Colmes, in which the environmental attorney compared Bush to Hitler. And Portman, late in the film, you half-expect her to wail, "I don't know no shame/I feel no pain/I can't," as if channeling the Sinnead O'Connor persona that produced "Mandinka". Unlike her "Star Wars" stint, Portman doesn't look overwhelmed by the spectacle, looking equally comfortable in a police state as she did in "Garden State".… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JackG.Mar 22, 2006

Very well done and definitely not your typical 'hero."

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

GnarlesMar 22, 2006

I had only medium expectations for V For Vendetta, but imagine my suprise when I loved just about every nasty second of it. Brutal, intelligent, awesomely styled, and often surprisingly hilarious, the movie is a blast if you're in the I had only medium expectations for V For Vendetta, but imagine my suprise when I loved just about every nasty second of it. Brutal, intelligent, awesomely styled, and often surprisingly hilarious, the movie is a blast if you're in the mood to be challenged. This is what Sin City should have been like. Those expecting The Matrix IV will be disappointed - and as well they should be. As V, Hugo Weaving pulls of an amazing feat, giving a completely convincing performance with only his voice and body language to work with. Only an occasionally uneven Natalie Portman performance and slow spots in the middle keep this from a perfect score. Marvelous, coal-black fun!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

GDMar 22, 2006

I'm a little suprised by the negative reviews. I thought, for the most part, the film was about as close an adaptation of the graphic novel as you could get (except for the ending). And while the acting may have been poor and the film I'm a little suprised by the negative reviews. I thought, for the most part, the film was about as close an adaptation of the graphic novel as you could get (except for the ending). And while the acting may have been poor and the film far from earth-shattering, the story did show how totalitarian governments start. People who live in fear, apathy, and/or anger, trust their leaders to get revenge or take back what is "theirs." The lies begin and that is the beginning of the end. Is the U.S. on a similar path? Hardly. Conservatives may bristle at the allusions to Bush and Iraq but I saw more Stalinism, fascism and the novel,1984, than the War on Terror, which is what the graphic novel was depicting (in 1982 no less). The filmmakers added those elements for contemporary reasons. I am surprised that so often Conservatives and the religious-right always feel like they have to shout down the opposing view or defend their position even in a movie review. Relax, it's just a movie!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

DaveMar 22, 2006

I hesitated to see this one, luckily some friends convinced me. The movie was a most excellent intermingling of Orwell's 1984, comic book heroism, and chivalry that I've ever seen. It was... The most loquacious litany of literary I hesitated to see this one, luckily some friends convinced me. The movie was a most excellent intermingling of Orwell's 1984, comic book heroism, and chivalry that I've ever seen. It was... The most loquacious litany of literary liturgy I've ever loved without any lassitude. The true romantic liberal could die peaceably after seeing this most wondrous movie...… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

FXTMar 22, 2006

I just could not stop watching it was a beautifull film witch so many second meaning (else then politcs, love and vengence) Seriusly a great MUST SEE!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

JDMar 22, 2006

Makes christians look like crazy right wing fundlementalists. Christians have been repressed to. Sure they don't agree with some of the things in this world but they're not as narrow minded as portrayed.

0 of 3 users found this helpful

9

TobiJ.Mar 22, 2006

Very good, subversive mix of history and comic book action.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

ShellyC.Mar 22, 2006

I feel this movie skimmed the surface of several American political issues without explanation or justification of any of them. I perceived blame being assigned to the US for terrorism and tyranny. Had this movie's political agenda been I feel this movie skimmed the surface of several American political issues without explanation or justification of any of them. I perceived blame being assigned to the US for terrorism and tyranny. Had this movie's political agenda been properly billed I would have never given my money for such psycho babble politics. One of the "good guys" had a nazi flag with the Koran in his secret room. This movie was pure garbage!… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful

10

CharlieM.Mar 21, 2006

The best film since Forty Year Old Virgin.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

8

TonydannieMar 21, 2006

This was an entertaning film. The visual style was unique. And it really opens your eyes to what is going on in the world right now. Fear is power. All that noise. I have to say while pepole are going goo- ga ga for Natalie Portman and her This was an entertaning film. The visual style was unique. And it really opens your eyes to what is going on in the world right now. Fear is power. All that noise. I have to say while pepole are going goo- ga ga for Natalie Portman and her shaved head. I have to send out props to Hugo Weaving who even though you cant see him while wearing that mask he still manages to capture you and draw you into the story. The acting from this particular actor was nothing more then excellence. If you go to see this movie . go see it for Hugo 's acting alone. Good fun. Couple of minor flaws. but i can deal with them.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

ChrisCurtisMar 21, 2006

Oh, man. This could have been so much better. I'm so disappointed in Portman's acting. She was great in Garden State, but her delivery here reminded me more of her Star Wars performances. Those who gave favorable reviews wereOh, man. This could have been so much better. I'm so disappointed in Portman's acting. She was great in Garden State, but her delivery here reminded me more of her Star Wars performances. Those who gave favorable reviews were obviously forgiving of her poorly developed British accent in this movie. It was bad. Then again, I'm a stickler for detail.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

MaverA.Mar 21, 2006

This film was fantastic because it delivers more than just flashy entertainment. It involves the viewer and makes them imagine and contemplate. What this film showed was daring because it talked about how the government make up story's This film was fantastic because it delivers more than just flashy entertainment. It involves the viewer and makes them imagine and contemplate. What this film showed was daring because it talked about how the government make up story's to scare the people so that the government can have a stronger hold over our lives. The power of fear is a powerful weapon that is used against us by our governments today! To be free of fear is to live. Dont let our governments scare you with its fabricated lies.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

ChrisZ.Mar 21, 2006

Having heard what a stinker this movie supposedly was, I went in expecting something along the lines of League of Extraordinary Gentlemen. As I watched I kept thinking, "so far so good," while nervously anticipating the suckiosity to kick in Having heard what a stinker this movie supposedly was, I went in expecting something along the lines of League of Extraordinary Gentlemen. As I watched I kept thinking, "so far so good," while nervously anticipating the suckiosity to kick in at any moment. When the film ended, I was a little stunned that I found myself liking it so much. I'm a big time Alan Moore fan, and first read "V for Vendetta" way back in the 80's. It seemed impossible that a film version could be made that wasn't dummed-down or changed entirely for the original work, as LOEG and From Hell had been. I am so happy that delighted that a quality film has come out of one of Moore's major works. Perhaps there's a chance that Watchmen will be made, and will be well-made. Having gone back and reread the criticisms that lead me to believe V for Vendetta would be a disappointment for me, I find that nothing anybody criticized about the film resonates with me at all. I usually can sees what it is critics who respond one way or another are reacting to, but in this case I was stumped. It makes me wonder if the material itself made some viewers so uncomfortable--since it can arguably be interpreted as "pro terrorist"--that they needed to make up reasons not to like it, while at the same time not wanting say they didn't like it because of the controversial political dimension. This would be a very lame reason not to like a film, especially if you're a young hip movie critic with your young hip movie critic credibility on the line. You can't not like a movie just because it's anti-establishment, right? It seems we've been conditioned like Pavlov's dog to have a instinctual gut reactions whenever the bell of "terror" is rung. We don't want to think about why people blow things up in the first place, and the very idea of a radical civil action being anything but "evil" runs contrary to our programming. Strange, in a country that was born of radical civil action, that we would be so afraid to call a good movie "good", just for addressing some issues we don't want to think about. The robust box office gives me hope, though, that the masses are, once again, way out in front of the media.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

PisforPropagandaMar 21, 2006

Visually seductive, this movie is about sending you the "other" message. Very 70's ish to me. Funny how Rolling Stone, Portland, and San Francisco newspapers all rate this so high...this is a movie for WTO rioters. The movie is not bad, Visually seductive, this movie is about sending you the "other" message. Very 70's ish to me. Funny how Rolling Stone, Portland, and San Francisco newspapers all rate this so high...this is a movie for WTO rioters. The movie is not bad, but it lacks examination of why those in power fear those they enslave. And why those who live and let live fail to maintain organized and safe societies. Why do people want tyrants, they obviously provide something and then degrade into something else. Hippies had their day and it didn't work. Life is a balance like the left and right hemispheres of the brain. People need to stop fighting other people as much as they need to start discipling themselves. This movie throws out a grand statement and then fails to get to the root of the truth...it blames others. Yawn. Still if you are smart enough to take a spoonful of what is said and displayed and realize this is just a graphic novel that requires large egos and bizarre material to keep you entertained then you can enjoy some of it. To me this is kind of a weak Stanley Kubrick movie that tries to sell a bit of nonsense as truth.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

10

EugeneH.Mar 21, 2006

Art and film make up fictions to reveal the truth, whereas politicians make up lies to conceal the truth: this brilliant film, sort of a cross between a Michael Moore documentary and George Orwell's 1984, demontsrates this difference Art and film make up fictions to reveal the truth, whereas politicians make up lies to conceal the truth: this brilliant film, sort of a cross between a Michael Moore documentary and George Orwell's 1984, demontsrates this difference beautifully. Based on a comic book, its made-up fiction is naturally over-the-top. But the truths it thereby reveals are so important, they make the inevitable exaggeration of the genre worthwhile.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

RandiP.Mar 21, 2006

This was an excellent film. It captures the heart of the revolutionary and makes you full of what is needed to make this world all the better. I'll definitely see this again.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JaredC.Mar 20, 2006

Strikes the delicate balance of being honest and hopeful at the end. A fine piece of filmmaking.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

JLMar 20, 2006

Awesome movie. Fast moving, intelligent. Brilliant character development.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

PrintNinjaMar 20, 2006

Was it great? No. Was it good? Yes! There have been better tellings of this tale, but none that I've enjoyed more on the big screen. One problem with such diverse and deep material is that it's hard to expand on every single Was it great? No. Was it good? Yes! There have been better tellings of this tale, but none that I've enjoyed more on the big screen. One problem with such diverse and deep material is that it's hard to expand on every single tangent. In this story, you have concurrently being told the history of the last 30 something years of the world, the personal back stories of the two main protagonists, the personal backstories of the main antagonist and two of his henchmen, a number of heavy general concepts - social injustice, political oppression, justice vs revenge, liberalism vs conservatism, terrorists vs freedom fighters, resurrection of the spirit, god vs man, and the minor issues of childhood development in the abscence of parents, the long-term effects of torture on the psyche, and how many obscure references to Shakespear can you squeeze into a movie without losing your non-literary audience. To touch on so many subjects without losing focus on the story, becoming mawkish or predictible, or appealing to the lowest common Hollywood denomenator is an admirable feat. Movies of this calibre have to pander *slightly* to the masses if they want to make a profit. This is reality. Too much action at the expense of a story, and you risk getting laughed at. To much intellectualism at the expense of action, and you end up with people walking out of the theater, yawning or scratching their heads (I know people who hated the first hour of the Matrix, but loved the second.) Granted, there were some predictable scenes. We all knew she had been "kidnapped" by V, and if she had come out of it the same person, the whole segment would have been pointless. But, that was the fire-walk for her, and even though they beat us over the head with the visual imagery, the segment was necessary. The ending was predictible as well, but from the beginning we already KNEW what was going to happen at the end. That didn't mean we didn't want to see each and every explosive frame. Movies, if they are thoughtful and visually interesting, can afford a little predictability. The first Batman wasn't particularly deep, but the futuristic art deco landscape kept your eyes glued to the screen, and distracted you from the simplistic plot. Both Batman and V for Vendetta followed the same rule - there's no such thing as safe advertising. Books rely on the reader to envision the author's creation. Movies adapted from books present the viewer with one persons vision, perhaps quite different from their own, and this can be disconcerting. That doesn't make it wrong. Film is also a time-limited medium. It's often taken for granted that people reading a book can spend as much, or as little time as they like combining details and narrative in order to visualize the author's workd. It's a trade-off, and one of the reasons it's so difficult to adapt books to movies. I read Star Wars a year before I saw the film, and while some things in the film came across seemlessly, others were totally unsettling. From reading the book, my perception of droids was quite different from what I saw on screen. I also got the impression that the space battle at the end was much longer then what I saw in the film. This was no doubt a consequence of those expensive 1970's special effects. There were many places where V for Vendetta could have taken a wrong turn, and ended up down a dead end, but didn't. For example, imagine if Natale Portman HAD, (in the typically cliched Hollywood fashion) taken off V's mask and kissed his scarred face! We'd have all run screaming from the theater, "noooooo!" Thank goodness they didn't do it. It was far more moving, to see her kiss the mask, and have to imagine his awkward reaction behind it. Since I've never read the book, I can't comment on how V for Vendetta stands as an adaptation, but as a film on its own, it stands up quite well. It's good fare, but not great, and nowadays, with all the cookie-cutter crud out there, I think a movie like this has to be forgiven a little, especially if it makes you think while entertaining you.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

CshoeMar 20, 2006

Best movie so far this year!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

PatrickM.Mar 20, 2006

I liked the 1984 connection. John Hurt was the last person to play Winston Smith in a production of Orwell's, 1984. Could they make the film in the U.S? I think self censorship would have prevented it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

CurtisJ.Mar 20, 2006

One of the most thoroughly satisfying movie experiences I've had in a long time. It entertains, it's beautifully made, well writtien,has something real to say about the world we live in, and doesn't cop out of it's One of the most thoroughly satisfying movie experiences I've had in a long time. It entertains, it's beautifully made, well writtien,has something real to say about the world we live in, and doesn't cop out of it's convictions like so much Hollywood fare. It also does not rely on special effects for it's entertainment value. Where effects are used they are top notch, and the sequence towards the end of the film is easily the best sequence of it's kind that I have ever seen on film. I hope this movie finds a huge audience.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

JohnH.Mar 20, 2006

Pros: Hugo Weaving provides excellent range to a character concealed by a mask, especially with respect to his fantasy fencing, posturing during dramatic sequencies and reasonable voice work. The atmosphere, although stereotypic with respect Pros: Hugo Weaving provides excellent range to a character concealed by a mask, especially with respect to his fantasy fencing, posturing during dramatic sequencies and reasonable voice work. The atmosphere, although stereotypic with respect to V's lair, did well to compliment the characters' fear of the fingermen, electronic surveillance and the constant potential for abduction, reminiscent of Brazil. Despite Alan Moore's discontent, the movie respects the graphic novel's mythology with respect to V's identity as an idea and Evey's transformation into a less fearful, more participatory dissent. Con's: [***SPOILERS***] The fall of Sutler at the very end was cheap and easy. The fact that he was so protected throughout the film and was easily kidnaped by his own cabal was a little hard to swallow. The ending was rushed and made easy to wrap up a 2.5 hour film. The evil would have been better developed with more detail and background story about Larkland. We don't see V become V. We don't see how he makes the transition from burned victim of a fire to a superhero. Developing a number of victims of Larkland so that we knew them, before their deaths and/or transformation to V. While we don't see who it is, feeling for all of them would have been more powerful.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

CJMar 20, 2006

Quite a good see, even if a bit controversial. Intriguing vision of extreme politicians striking fear into the hearts of the citizens, but not unrealistic in parts. Was annoyed by the long scenes without changing to another set of characters.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

JanB.Mar 20, 2006

Marxists and anarchists will love this movie. The basic theme? Christians are fascists who seek to round up all the gays and Muslims, USA and UK "Coalition of the willing" are nazis who kill their own people with bio weapons to create a Marxists and anarchists will love this movie. The basic theme? Christians are fascists who seek to round up all the gays and Muslims, USA and UK "Coalition of the willing" are nazis who kill their own people with bio weapons to create a police state. The looney left's beliefs brought to the big screen at last!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

8

StefanS.Mar 20, 2006

V for Vendetta is a great look into one of the many possiable futures we face. More then anything V offers an entertaining look at what is possiable when one person decides to take a stand against a seemingly unbeatable opressor. V looks V for Vendetta is a great look into one of the many possiable futures we face. More then anything V offers an entertaining look at what is possiable when one person decides to take a stand against a seemingly unbeatable opressor. V looks deeply into how freedom is can be taken away slowly and leaves the characters wondering when things really changed. I enjoyed the film and suggest it not just because it is a currently relevent film but because of its entertainment value.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

TomO.Mar 20, 2006

Look. Alan Moore had his name taken off the credits for a reason. The original comic is a magnificent piece of subversive, political and social commentary; this film is cynical action fodder, pandering to the feeble idea that we the public Look. Alan Moore had his name taken off the credits for a reason. The original comic is a magnificent piece of subversive, political and social commentary; this film is cynical action fodder, pandering to the feeble idea that we the public are all 'good people' who rise up when oppressed by the forces of evil. Give me a break. Moore tackled issues of complicity and how fascism can be taken as a viable system of government. He created a piece of work that demmands introspection from its audience. This film removes any value from its original source and replaces it with another empty piece of 'entertainment', peddling the usual nonsense that 'good people' (us) only let bad, destructive people into power when they have been tricked. This film is a cop out on every level.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful

8

JudeP.Mar 20, 2006

I found it interesting and and although I am a lefty, I didn't actually agree with all the politics side. I felt the ideas were made with rather broad strokes. However policital fiction has always taken the situation to the extreme as a I found it interesting and and although I am a lefty, I didn't actually agree with all the politics side. I felt the ideas were made with rather broad strokes. However policital fiction has always taken the situation to the extreme as a method of analysing them - Animal Farm, 1984,Gulliver's travels, Swift's modest proposal for dealing with the Irish famine. I think maybe this should be a double billing with Ghandi just to balance things out a bit. Anyone who feels that TV had to much of a prevelance should watch/read Noam Chomsky's manufacturing consent, before deciding how much our lives are dictated by the media. It was billed too much as a thriller and I hate the fact they showed Big Ben blowing up in the trailer talk about giving the ending away!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

RyanF.Mar 20, 2006

This has to be one of the best movies I"ve seen this year [so far]. It's great when an action movie, well, doesn't use action to move the story. Hugo Weaving once again amazes me at his ability to act any part, and he made V a very This has to be one of the best movies I"ve seen this year [so far]. It's great when an action movie, well, doesn't use action to move the story. Hugo Weaving once again amazes me at his ability to act any part, and he made V a very likeable character. Natalie Portman was pretty good, I guess. But as I mentioned earlier about an action movie that doesn't use action to move the plot, V for Vendetta ending action was executed perfectly. It also showed that V isn't perfect. I always love when a movie gives me the shivers. And that makes a great movie.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

5

AndrewK.Mar 20, 2006

Politics really shouldn't even come into the equation. This is about rating a film. Was it well made? And the measure of that is whether people are entertained. Obviously, many people were, and a few were not. I enjoyed certain parts of Politics really shouldn't even come into the equation. This is about rating a film. Was it well made? And the measure of that is whether people are entertained. Obviously, many people were, and a few were not. I enjoyed certain parts of the film, excited to see the characters and events from one of my favorite books. I try to distance myself from the source material when I see an adaptation, but I couldn't help thinking all the way through the film that it would've been so much better if they'd left a lot of things as they were. I agree that this was billed too much as an action film, and its really not. And that's not a bad thing. But to me, knowing the original text, I was dissapointed in the actual content and dialogue of the film. The "message" is not delivered in anywhere near as intelligent a fashion as done by Alan Moore. Few can match his talent. I tried to view the film as a piece by itself, but while it wasn't neccesarily a bad film, it just didn't do it for me. The only acting that really bothered me was John Hurt, chewing the misc en scenery. For the record, this is the director's first film. Someone on here called it his worst film yet. How can that be if its the first one he's made? I also agree with the comment that some scenes were "Matrixy." If you were at all moved by this film, I urge you to go read the original graphic novel, and see how much more intense and meaningfull it is. All that being said, and while I hesitate to bring up the political aspect, it must be addressed. I felt it was a little too obvious that they were trying to make references to our current political atmosphere. And that cheapens the original story. I know very little about Margaret Thatcher, but I don't believe that Alan Moore shoved any references down people's throats. This movie also might've been much better if it had been made pre-9/11, or much further in the future. Nothing that comes out these days can speak about the government or terrorists without being labeled as a statement on politics. Lastly, why are there so many comments from the editor being stuck into our own reviews? They seem to be conveying the editor's own opinion of our reviews, when this is supposed to be our way of openly expressing our opinion. Just edit. Don't give us your opinion on our thoughts. Thank you. [Ed: Well said.]… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

0

JosiahR.Mar 20, 2006

I'm dumber for having seen this movie. Incoherent, lacking in style, over-wrought pretentious dialogue. Like a pissed off teenager who can't get laid wrote it. Geez.

0 of 3 users found this helpful

10

JordanB.Mar 20, 2006

One of the best films ive seen in a ong time, the Guy Fawkes mask surprisingly never gets old throughout the movie, V's character is original even though he echoes many characters throughout history, very fun to imagine and not hard to One of the best films ive seen in a ong time, the Guy Fawkes mask surprisingly never gets old throughout the movie, V's character is original even though he echoes many characters throughout history, very fun to imagine and not hard to believe, gets a 10 without a doubt.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

7

KevinG.Mar 20, 2006

The premise behind the film was excellent, sadly the film was to be foud lacking generally. The plot is sluggish and is far too choppy and the way the back story is weaved in takes away form the the current action (of which there is'nt The premise behind the film was excellent, sadly the film was to be foud lacking generally. The plot is sluggish and is far too choppy and the way the back story is weaved in takes away form the the current action (of which there is'nt half enough anyway). When the the action scenes happened they were good especially the ending knife sequence whch is worth the ticket entry alone.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

SamiW.Mar 20, 2006

I went to this movie, looking for entertainment and found it. Not just some sleazy chick flick that has a pre-written format for content but something that made me think deeply about government and people. The dialogue was amusing, and I I went to this movie, looking for entertainment and found it. Not just some sleazy chick flick that has a pre-written format for content but something that made me think deeply about government and people. The dialogue was amusing, and I absolutely loved Portman. The backround information was sketchy at best and the reason for blowing up parliament vague and more left to the imagination than anything. The movie has faults but I believe that there are movies that have a less entertainment value given good reviews than a movie that requires you think and believe in something more being harped upon because of politics. When I want to watch a movie, I check my politics at the door.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

[Anonymous]Mar 20, 2006

Seriously, its one of the best movies i'd seen in a long long while. One of the most memorable films ever seen. And trust me, i've seen LOTS of movies and am pretty jaded by trash these days. Go read the better critic reviews. They Seriously, its one of the best movies i'd seen in a long long while. One of the most memorable films ever seen. And trust me, i've seen LOTS of movies and am pretty jaded by trash these days. Go read the better critic reviews. They got it right this time.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

SverreE.Mar 20, 2006

Argh! Forget the politics! This simply isn't a very good film!

0 of 2 users found this helpful

0

ChrisS.Mar 20, 2006

The worst thing about this film is that it makes the ideals of Anarchism and the Libertarian-Left sound completely stupid.

0 of 3 users found this helpful

0

CraigAaen-S.Mar 20, 2006

V for Very Very Bad Film - As a fan of the comic, my opinion might be considered biased, but the FIVE people I took with me to the cinema had never heard of Alan Moore or V for Vendetta and we all roundly thought that this film was utterly V for Very Very Bad Film - As a fan of the comic, my opinion might be considered biased, but the FIVE people I took with me to the cinema had never heard of Alan Moore or V for Vendetta and we all roundly thought that this film was utterly rubbish. Don't be fooled by the trailer, there isn't enough action to provide half-decent entertainment. Instead the Wachowski Boys are trying their damnedest to be intelligent and they just make everybody sound stupid. There is a fine line between poking fun at the British and being completely patronizing. Maybe that can explain the good reviews of this film over on that side of the Atlantic, but I can't explain the good reviews of it that we've had over here. There is nothing to recommend this film apart from a mildly amusing Benny Hill type sketch in the middle. Utterly cringeworthy. I was embarrassed that I had recommended going to see it.… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful

0

AaronA.Mar 19, 2006

The whole point about fascism is that it's driven by nihilism. I don't like George Bush either, but maybe if the Wachowski brothers understood this, they wouldn't have spent quite so much time fetishizing Nazi aesthetics and The whole point about fascism is that it's driven by nihilism. I don't like George Bush either, but maybe if the Wachowski brothers understood this, they wouldn't have spent quite so much time fetishizing Nazi aesthetics and celebrating senseless violence for its own sake.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

V for Vendetta

User Reviews