Warner Bros. Pictures | Release Date: March 17, 2006
7.8
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 1394 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
1,124
Mixed:
93
Negative:
177
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
9
RumblebeeloveJan 22, 2011
An enjoyable movie for those who want a bit of philosophy with their action. Weaving and Portman are phenominal, while the cinematography and mood are great. Though it is good, don't compare it to the graphic novel by Alan Moore(as manyAn enjoyable movie for those who want a bit of philosophy with their action. Weaving and Portman are phenominal, while the cinematography and mood are great. Though it is good, don't compare it to the graphic novel by Alan Moore(as many changes were made), nor look too deeply at the philosophy on hand. It is a middle ground film in ways, but I enjoyed the mix. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
bio595Nov 17, 2010
I thought this film was fantastic.
I think that the way Hugo Weaving portrayed V without ever showing his face was a great testament to his ability as actor and Natalie Portman was great as well.
The tone and setting is great as well and as a
I thought this film was fantastic.
I think that the way Hugo Weaving portrayed V without ever showing his face was a great testament to his ability as actor and Natalie Portman was great as well.
The tone and setting is great as well and as a fan of dystopian film and literature, this film hooked me straight away.
Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
8
MetalMan95Nov 5, 2010
Superb acting, really awesome lines, great action, and an effective political message. what more can you ask for?? This was really well done and there were scenes when i was like "yes!"
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
8
ryancarroll88Aug 27, 2010
This blast of subversive pop cinema is a thrill ride from beginning to end, and probably stands as the best film adaptation of all Alan Moore's work. However, the production is both propelled and impaired by the Wachowski Brothers' influenceThis blast of subversive pop cinema is a thrill ride from beginning to end, and probably stands as the best film adaptation of all Alan Moore's work. However, the production is both propelled and impaired by the Wachowski Brothers' influence - the stylized violence is bound to be campy in a few years' time and the dramatic storyline is carried too much by actors with the same serious deadpan British accent (hearing just audio, I doubt I'd be able to differentiate the voices.) Still, in the end, the movie gives us exactly what we want - controversy, an awesome antihero, and a huge, giant explosion. Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
8
RobWheelerSep 3, 2009
Blimey, there's some scathing comments there. I really enjoyed this film, maybe more so because I treated it as a work of fiction and didn't draw comparisons between it and the real world. A good storyline, decent enough acting,Blimey, there's some scathing comments there. I really enjoyed this film, maybe more so because I treated it as a work of fiction and didn't draw comparisons between it and the real world. A good storyline, decent enough acting, some fine visuals and some good plot twists made good viewing. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
9
IainWAug 1, 2009
This is the one film i have ever seen, that has taken a comic, altered it and come out with a good result at the end, the changes are subtle to make the film better, judging by the low reviews from "professional" American critics it is This is the one film i have ever seen, that has taken a comic, altered it and come out with a good result at the end, the changes are subtle to make the film better, judging by the low reviews from "professional" American critics it is obvious they don't appreciate the subtle intelligence that Alan Moore wove into the original story, "people should not be afraid of their government, governments should be afraid of their people". Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
jamesmJul 8, 2009
Great movie, great action, and many philosophical ideas and concepts have been used to show us what a future world will look like. LOVE the ending, it can be translated and taken many different ways.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
BrandonMJul 4, 2009
Excellent Movie, Best message and a peak of what may be a visible future for America. Watch it twice.
6 of 7 users found this helpful
0
KristinaSApr 6, 2009
The film won
0 of 4 users found this helpful
8
KerryL.Mar 8, 2009
After reading the posts on the site, I felt inclined to put in my two cents. V was a fine movie, but as with any movie, it had flaws. The biggest flaw was Natalie Portman. She was poorly cast; the role seemed too big for her. The rest of the After reading the posts on the site, I felt inclined to put in my two cents. V was a fine movie, but as with any movie, it had flaws. The biggest flaw was Natalie Portman. She was poorly cast; the role seemed too big for her. The rest of the actors did an amazing job, especially Hugo Weaving even though you never see his face. The British actors did an excellent job, as they almost always do. The film has a fine plot, but it took entirely too much depth out of the novel. The film could have been about half an hour longer and been much better. What is very interesting about the story is that despite being written more than twenty years ago, it remains relevant today. Although not as good as it could have been, it is definitely worth watching. A mature audience which is not letting its political biases cloud its judgments will enjoy the film for what it is: a good action film, with a quality story. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
ChrisSelwaFeb 9, 2009
The voting tells you more about people than the film.
The story is a powerful one showing a future in which right wing extremism goes well, to extremes. The rankings seem less about the movie more about the readers reaction to the
The voting tells you more about people than the film.
The story is a powerful one showing a future in which right wing extremism goes well, to extremes. The rankings seem less about the movie more about the readers reaction to the consequences of extremism in the state.

I did not find the plot that unbelieveable, rather a bit too close to reality for comfort. Plagues like that are conceivable. Medi manipulation like that is conceivble. And the masses well we were led after September 11th weren't we?

The way it critises those who hate for race or religious reasons...I can well understand their reactions to this movie. Better a backlash against the movie rather than one at ourselves.

10. Its novel. Its clever. No other movie like it. ...but its definatly not Superman saves the world.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
SylvokAJan 11, 2009
Was an alright movie, not the best ever made but one I still dont mind watching. Also side note, but did anyone else notice a large amount of the negative reviews seem to be copy-pasted. I think this got freepered at one point.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
DanDec 6, 2008
One of my favorite movies. I understand why some didn't enjoy this movie, but for me everything really came together. The story may be "juvenile" in terms of politics, but maybe it needs to be so that more people can understand it. One of my favorite movies. I understand why some didn't enjoy this movie, but for me everything really came together. The story may be "juvenile" in terms of politics, but maybe it needs to be so that more people can understand it. Moving, and politically motivating. Take the chance if you are on the edge, it really is phenomenal. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
HarryF.Nov 4, 2008
This is an amazing film, great characters, lots of action, but at times it is also very dark and political, and even humourous at times. You will like the characters in this film, especially V, who is impossible not to like.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
AnonymousMCOct 27, 2008
The 2006 movie V for Vendetta is an intelligent, action packed, political thrill ride. The movie is based on the David Lloyd graph novel. The Wachowski Brothers (The Matrix) wrote the screen play and James McTeigue directed this great movie.The 2006 movie V for Vendetta is an intelligent, action packed, political thrill ride. The movie is based on the David Lloyd graph novel. The Wachowski Brothers (The Matrix) wrote the screen play and James McTeigue directed this great movie. V for Vendetta takes place in a near future Great Britain with a totalitarian regime in power. The theme that portrayed throughout the movie is that the people should not be afraid of their government, the government should be afraid of its people. The main character Evey Hammond (Nathalie Portman) is a working class woman who gets mixed up with the mysterious freedom fighter/terrorist known only as V. The man in the Guy Fox mask is played by Hugo Weaving (Mr. Smith in The Matrix). V wants nothing more than to topple the unjust and controlling totalitarian regime by any means necessary which brings up many ethical dilemmas throughout the movie. Symbolism is a huge part of the movie and is coupled with intelligent dialogue and allows for an intellectually rewarding experience. Nathalie Portman delivers a good acting performance and really goes all the way with shaving her head. Hugo Weaving delivers as well with the difficult situation of having to act without any facial expression and exclusively using tone of voice and hand gestures. Overall V for Vendetta satisfies your pallet for intelligent storyline, thrilling action sequences, and creative acting that keeps you engaged for the entire two hours of movie magic. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
DavidOct 17, 2008
An all-around dreadful film. Terrible dialogue, subpar acting, wrapped in a story filled with absurd, juvenile politics with obvious and obligatory nods to the present-day "War on Terror" for easily amused critics to fawn over. Provoked noAn all-around dreadful film. Terrible dialogue, subpar acting, wrapped in a story filled with absurd, juvenile politics with obvious and obligatory nods to the present-day "War on Terror" for easily amused critics to fawn over. Provoked no emotional or visceral reaction from me, other than laughter at its banality, and when it ended, astonishment at how such garbage could be so widely praised. If you're out of high school, and like good films, pass on this. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful
10
LDJun 27, 2008
You people are crazy. Whether some people believe it or not, movies affect and move people. When I get done watching what I believe to be a great movie, I get a great feeling after watching it. And that's what I felt after this one. One You people are crazy. Whether some people believe it or not, movies affect and move people. When I get done watching what I believe to be a great movie, I get a great feeling after watching it. And that's what I felt after this one. One of the best stories I've seen out of Hollywood so far. LOVE IT! Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
10
EdwardD.Jun 24, 2008
This film is the best that I have ever laid my eyes on. I have seen it over 16 times and i could still see it more. It includes violence, blood shed, action, romance and yet retains it British touch of class. V the main character choses to This film is the best that I have ever laid my eyes on. I have seen it over 16 times and i could still see it more. It includes violence, blood shed, action, romance and yet retains it British touch of class. V the main character choses to use words over weapons and uses weapons only to insure his words get through to his audience. But brilliantly this movie differs to the stereotypical category that super hero films seem unable to claw it way out of. But the first time I watched this movie I thought, why the hell didn't I get to see his face. But this movie dose not show its main characters face. It leaves an opening for the audience to create there idea of "V" and his physical appearance. Every time I watch this movie I love it even more. The fact that you fo not even see the main characters face is a testament to it differentialness from any other hero film. This movie also manages to turn an evil terrorist "V" and tells his story so poetically that you feel how he feels, you see what I see" and yes that was a line from the film. Also the use of words in this movie is perfect. The way that every single speech has been carved into a perfect statue that represents his anger and disobedience against this extreme right wing political party. Those are the reasons for why I love V for Vendetta so much, that I would be willing to defend it to the hill and keep my conscious clean. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
JohnM.Jun 22, 2008
A deeply flawed yet deeply beautiful movie. Its reach exceeds its grasp, and only scratches the surface of the problems, principles and conundrums it purports to engage with, but as a stirring visual poem on our occasional responsibility to A deeply flawed yet deeply beautiful movie. Its reach exceeds its grasp, and only scratches the surface of the problems, principles and conundrums it purports to engage with, but as a stirring visual poem on our occasional responsibility to be irresponsible, it satisfies and stirs. Don't expect to be challenged, but don't expect to be talked down to either. Personally I'm glad to see a story such as this given the pop culture treatment, and mercifully lose relatively little. The dialogue leaves much to be desired, but V's monologues are superb, and Weaving's ability to connect from behind a mask is commendable. My only real objection is that the Beautiful Lesbian Love Story gets ten glorious minutes, while the male-on-male Mapplethorpe pictures get all of three seconds from an obscure angle :) (Also, anyone who makes kneejerk references to this as "liberal, leftist" propaganda clearly doesn't know what either of those words mean, and would probably be the perfect constituent for the movie's dictator!). Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
DangerB.May 6, 2008
Love this movie. I suspect all the people that hated it get their news from Limbaugh and O'Riley.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JanmikS.Apr 28, 2008
Very very impressive. Takes note of deeper issues unlike the other plotless, cutaneous movies that resort to overused plot devices.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
MarkD.Apr 17, 2008
Acting, plot, and story are excellent. Ending tops it off perfectly. Couldn't have asked for more...
1 of 1 users found this helpful
2
JasonDApr 16, 2008
A waste of time. Tries too many directions at once: arthouse, action entertainment, and moral message. Without any clear direction it failed to make sense or even entertain. I can give up the money for a rental, but I felt robbed of my time.
1 of 2 users found this helpful
10
RobbieO.Apr 15, 2008
A very good movie with movie twists and suspenseful action
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
RacA.Mar 4, 2008
This was a readlly good movie! i recommend it to everyone!
1 of 1 users found this helpful
10
ZachB.Mar 3, 2008
This is by far the most down to the point movie I have watched.
1 of 1 users found this helpful
0
PaulW.Feb 27, 2008
A completely farcical take on Orwell's 1984 with one of the worst 'acting performances' by Natalie Portman to date. Superficiality of characters, plot and politics and not even in a entertaining way. Special mention must go to A completely farcical take on Orwell's 1984 with one of the worst 'acting performances' by Natalie Portman to date. Superficiality of characters, plot and politics and not even in a entertaining way. Special mention must go to the cringe worthy script with a fetish for sophomore-level alliteration starting with the letter 'v'. In short, the perfect film for a general acclaim and fit to shelve next to other recent entries in the IMDb top250 such as Million Dollar Baby, Children of Men and Labirinto del Fauno which most dreadfully shows the abysmal decline in good taste and cinematic appreciation which is sweeping the Earth like a virus. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful
10
JohnL.Nov 4, 2007
V for Vendetta is one of the greatest comics book hero movies of all time and the greatest movie of the 21st Century.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
ColbyS.Jul 1, 2007
I was expecting a lot better, maybe. It turned out to be a liberal, leftist propaganda vehicle first, story second. The only good press it got was from mainly liberal publications. Go figure. Beyond my disagreement with the beliefs I was expecting a lot better, maybe. It turned out to be a liberal, leftist propaganda vehicle first, story second. The only good press it got was from mainly liberal publications. Go figure. Beyond my disagreement with the beliefs expressed, this could've been made so much better, as the concept could've been riveting. Instead it was boring as all hell and preachy to boot. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful
10
WilliamY.Jun 13, 2007
Complex, yet down to earth, this movie combines great vocabulary with great ideas and some awesome actions scenes, even though the Washington post says it's hard to connect with a masked figure, we all know what he was for and really Complex, yet down to earth, this movie combines great vocabulary with great ideas and some awesome actions scenes, even though the Washington post says it's hard to connect with a masked figure, we all know what he was for and really how he felt on the topic. I found this to be my all time favorite movie and I have watched TONS of movies. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
CarlW.May 21, 2007
This movie IS thought provoking. Many critics caught up in the rush to elitism brand this as oversimplistic, shallow, and irresponsible. I am delighted to have an alternative to "The Hills Have Eyes 5" and "Saw 12" Evidently some critics This movie IS thought provoking. Many critics caught up in the rush to elitism brand this as oversimplistic, shallow, and irresponsible. I am delighted to have an alternative to "The Hills Have Eyes 5" and "Saw 12" Evidently some critics wouldn't know shallow, and irresponsible if it bit them on the ass. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
ChadSweeMay 16, 2007
V for Vendetta, an action movie from the Wachowski Brothers (the matrix trilogy), is a film that ultimately doesn't live up to the expectations i had for it. Revenge seems to be in every blockbuster movie nowadays, and V for Vendetta isV for Vendetta, an action movie from the Wachowski Brothers (the matrix trilogy), is a film that ultimately doesn't live up to the expectations i had for it. Revenge seems to be in every blockbuster movie nowadays, and V for Vendetta is no exception, hence the word "Vendetta" in the title. The acting is nothing to brag about. Natalie Portman plays Evey and shows no talent whatsoever. Evey accomponies V, the masked man, for the majority of the film. Hugo Weaving plays the role of V, and since he is behind a mask the entire movie his acting skills aren't displayed. However, what V for Vendetta lacks in acting talent it compensates for with a good futuristic story, one that is full of cover-ups, wars, and government corruption. The action is fairly weak, especially when being compared to the matrix trilogy, but it's satisfying enough. Lastly, the directing is on par with any other movie out to date, nothing is fancy or dull about how it was directed. Overall V for Vendetta is an above average film, but could have potentially been better. To put it simply it wasn't a film i regretted watching, but it isn't a film i will brag over. On a scale of one to ten, five being average, i would give V for Vendetta a six. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
BrentMay 4, 2007
One of the best, if not THE best movie, I have ever seen. Perfect blend of action and philosophy and politics.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
RobinJ.Apr 21, 2007
I enjoyed the film. Portmans performance is great but Hugo Weaving speaks to dramatically. It was as if V was trying to make himself sound dangerous and intelligent. Evey didn't seem to play an important part in the film but just stay I enjoyed the film. Portmans performance is great but Hugo Weaving speaks to dramatically. It was as if V was trying to make himself sound dangerous and intelligent. Evey didn't seem to play an important part in the film but just stay around V and blow up the parliment for him. Nontheless the idea that V stresses speaks for itself. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
MithyusMar 25, 2007
And ideas, Mr. Creedy, are petty-rants, complex verbous babbling criticts -proof.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
MichaelA.Mar 17, 2007
A Very fine, well planned, and Virtuous film. The foreshadowing was utterly brilliant and Hugo WeaVing and Natalie Portman made this moVie one of the greatest I'Ve eVer seen!! It has a perfect mix of action, drama, mystery, twists, and A Very fine, well planned, and Virtuous film. The foreshadowing was utterly brilliant and Hugo WeaVing and Natalie Portman made this moVie one of the greatest I'Ve eVer seen!! It has a perfect mix of action, drama, mystery, twists, and turns. An astounding moVie! Remember, remember, the fifth of NoVember! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
DavidHammerFeb 21, 2007
Scarcely a single redeeming quality. Managed to see that other piece-of-shit juvenile myopic lefty vision of a future fascist dystopia Britain Children of Men for I saw this (for the record, I'm left-wing too), but this one, although tooScarcely a single redeeming quality. Managed to see that other piece-of-shit juvenile myopic lefty vision of a future fascist dystopia Britain Children of Men for I saw this (for the record, I'm left-wing too), but this one, although too calamitously silly to be as bland as the aforementioned film, takes biscuit in the laughable stakes. Jurn Hurt LITERALLY has the same expression on his face every time we see him (while he's alive). Portman spends the film sitting in people's living rooms and being tortured and generally struggling to conjure up an convincing facial expression (why is this woman allowed to work in film?), Weaving talks in awkward, pretentious riddles, and stabs people.

It didn't seem possible that the Wachowski Bros could something more cringemakingly awful than the Matrix Revolutions, but it appears they have truely outdone themselves.
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
8
DavidH.Feb 10, 2007
V was a very good film, anyone giving it less than a 7, not only came in midway through the film, but is over critical of the great performances given by Portman and Weaving.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
ReidF.Jan 27, 2007
Although based on a graphic novel, this is anything but a vapid action film. In fact, there is a stretch in the middle that deliberately moves quite slowly, but instead of being bored, I was drawn to its beauty and elegance. Combining Although based on a graphic novel, this is anything but a vapid action film. In fact, there is a stretch in the middle that deliberately moves quite slowly, but instead of being bored, I was drawn to its beauty and elegance. Combining politics, action, and intrigue, this is a new breed of film, and I hope they make more like it. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
TomS.Jan 25, 2007
Over the top trash unbelievable trash. Revolution? I'd like to see what happens next... It's tried to be too clever. Theres nothing to tell us why the government has seemingly gone crazy and decided to shout at everyone... Over the top trash unbelievable trash. Revolution? I'd like to see what happens next... It's tried to be too clever. Theres nothing to tell us why the government has seemingly gone crazy and decided to shout at everyone... ;Portman's performance is awful, not sure anyone who has reviewed this is English but to me its pretty blatant from the start her voice is dodgy . Silly action sequences where V can withstand 5 billion bullets. Doesn't make you think. Sound is bland. Anything else? Oh yes, its all very well blowing buildings up but it really won't sort anything out. I can see that humankind is supposed to be united under tragedies like oppression but this just wouldn't happen. Not even in a world where people where gimpy masks. There is a reason for law! Anarchy in the UK? No thanks. It's more of a personal thing to express oneself in a rebellious and sometimes stupid way but this film captures what the UK would be like if everyone had taken crack and then decided to terrorize parliament. Ridiculous! Probably the worst film I have seen since Revolver! 1 star because the DVD didn't break. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
9
PeterM.Jan 19, 2007
V for Vendetta is not a perfect movie, but considering the fact that it is very exciting and still manages to deliver a meaningful, relevant message is commendable. It is a shame that because of the political climate in the country it is V for Vendetta is not a perfect movie, but considering the fact that it is very exciting and still manages to deliver a meaningful, relevant message is commendable. It is a shame that because of the political climate in the country it is being overlooked for serious recognition. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
DavidNov 25, 2006
Very good indeed. It's not often that films that are not explicity marketed as "think pieces" generate some serious thought. For the attentive viewer, there's enough heavyweight material in here to dwell on for days. I feel that Very good indeed. It's not often that films that are not explicity marketed as "think pieces" generate some serious thought. For the attentive viewer, there's enough heavyweight material in here to dwell on for days. I feel that Brits will particularly enjoy this film, but it also appeals to (dare I say) a mass audience. As V comments, ideas are hard to kill, and my mind was seething with them following my viewing. Add to that, it was a thrilling ride to boot. This is a film made by a professional. V is particulary captivating, and has a keen sense of timing for an apt literary quote. Add to that the attention to detail and subtle presentation. There's some very subtle splicing of modern day issues (and newsreel) into the film, presented as "history". Very good indeed. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
BenW.Sep 23, 2006
This has to be my favorite movie of all time! It has a great twist to it, if you liked the first Matrix, then you will love this movie!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
EricD.Sep 17, 2006
This movie did have it's share of flaws, most do, but I enjoyed it more than just about anything that I've seen in the last year. It is super relevant, in my opinion, to what is going on in the U.S. right now.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
RPSep 16, 2006
A truly fantastic thriller/sci-fi, that was not only captivating, but featured mesmerizing performances by Weaving and Portman and was thought-provoking as well.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
JonathanC.Sep 16, 2006
It was better to me than the Matrix. It was very political but it was played very well. I think the letter scene could have been done better.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
waltergSep 8, 2006
I believe this film is the first film in a long long time that has made me really think about my place in society....How far do we go to defend our rights as human beings?...How far do you go to save the lives of your fellow man?
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
PatC.Sep 6, 2006
I give it credit for expressing its own art. Nonetheless it remains a political thriller without all that stressful intrigue and zing.
0 of 3 users found this helpful
8
AmurabiM.Sep 4, 2006
This is first rate entertaiment. The kind of pop art that entertains, made us think and amuses us for its collection of ideas and unlimited imagery. James McTeigue´s first effort (of "The Matrix" gang) is just a big exercise of This is first rate entertaiment. The kind of pop art that entertains, made us think and amuses us for its collection of ideas and unlimited imagery. James McTeigue´s first effort (of "The Matrix" gang) is just a big exercise of uncompromising fillmmaking. Its great to watch a film that masked in the label of action entertainment displays a powerful message of freedom. After see "V for Vendetta", everyone thinks about the responsability in the process of actual living: are we members of the mass? libertarians? opressors? what part we play? This is the kind of ideas that this unique film develops. With its message hidden in the form of standard thriller (with a bunch of symbolisms and philosophical reflections), "V for Vendetta" gives us, too, great pleasure to be distracted. This is not escapism, or, better, is the collection of anarchisms wrapped up in the way of escapism. "V for Vendetta" has a clear sense of Orwell and a thought about totalitarian regimes, but the great failure in the film is the waste of time to represent this ideas and make them "swallowable" to teenage audiences that watch the film as an action flick, so the whole intention of being incendiary is just forgotten by the masses that in the film are portrayed. But, what if only one person goes out of the cinema making an exercise of personal reflection about its own freedom? That doesn´t mean that someone could walk out of the Cineplex to make a bomb and blow up the Oval Office, but, just (and I think that is the only purpose of the movie) think about the part we play in this society. For a film that looks inicuous and not too big, that powerful message is a thing to get honored. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
CherylC.Sep 4, 2006
Decent acting. Sophomoric attempt at political philosophy. Actually, just plain stupid when all said and done.
0 of 13 users found this helpful
10
StephanieV.Sep 4, 2006
In a country filled with "sheep"; I think this film was an excellent way to deliver a very pointed warning about the fear mongering and wars that are used to influence public opinion and line the pockets of the wealthy.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
MichaelL.Sep 3, 2006
I really liked this movie--despite myself. I expected a dumbed down comic book adaptation (I'm so sick of comic book adaptations--is this the best Hollywood can come up with?) and was treated to a surprisingly thought-provoking and I really liked this movie--despite myself. I expected a dumbed down comic book adaptation (I'm so sick of comic book adaptations--is this the best Hollywood can come up with?) and was treated to a surprisingly thought-provoking and amazingy topical politcal tale. Great perfromances all around; Natalie Portman proves her multi-leveled "Closer" performance wasn't a fluke (and erases her cardboard "Star Wars" acting from memory once and for all). Critics may call the message of this film simplistic--but I'm thrilled to see a film aimed at a young demographic with any message at all besides "wow, aren't these effects awesome?". There's enough action to interest the MTV attention span generation, enough pyrotechnics to thrill the techno geeks, and most important, enough cautionary tale to resonate with those who actually have a brain in their head. A neat film with a wonderful mantra: People shouldn't fear their Government, the Government should fear the people. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
SteveT.Aug 28, 2006
I have documented proof that Guy Fawkes wore a Hugo Weaving mask (just kidding). This was a very exciting movie. Hugo Weaving was fantastic even though his face was never seen. I don't think that the imbedded story about the Lesbian I have documented proof that Guy Fawkes wore a Hugo Weaving mask (just kidding). This was a very exciting movie. Hugo Weaving was fantastic even though his face was never seen. I don't think that the imbedded story about the Lesbian love affair adding anything essential to the plot. Neither did the slow-mo blood letting. The basic story itself made an excellent point about surrendering freedom under fear. It happened in Germany 70 years. I hope it never happens here. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JimT.Aug 23, 2006
Lets keep it real folks. The movie / comic book is obviously and homage to 1984. Considering when the original comic came out and how near the world was to becoming 1984 it was very timely. 20 years in the future and we are facing the same Lets keep it real folks. The movie / comic book is obviously and homage to 1984. Considering when the original comic came out and how near the world was to becoming 1984 it was very timely. 20 years in the future and we are facing the same problems. If your looking for mindless entertainment I suggest standing in line waiting to get on a plane. If you would like a movie with a point V is perfect. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
GregA.Aug 22, 2006
This was a good comic book film with good plot and, unusually for such films, an intelligible script. But why do people want serious political messages from such a genre? Some have compared it with 1984 and Brave New World. This is just sad. This was a good comic book film with good plot and, unusually for such films, an intelligible script. But why do people want serious political messages from such a genre? Some have compared it with 1984 and Brave New World. This is just sad. Obviously it could be better (so could everything) but there are some good touches: the use of a 16/17th century Catholic terrorist as a symbol of modern freedom was nicely ironic, whilst the vision of thousands of Guy Fawkes attending the destruction of the Houses of Parliament was very good indeed (I am English by the way). Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
SimonB.Aug 19, 2006
I love it. I love all of you. I wonder what is it people go for in movies anymore. We complain about acting, about facts, about realism. Then we complain this or that is not true, or this and that is ripped off that guy's book. HEY. Let I love it. I love all of you. I wonder what is it people go for in movies anymore. We complain about acting, about facts, about realism. Then we complain this or that is not true, or this and that is ripped off that guy's book. HEY. Let me remind you something real quick, boys. A movie isn't reality. V for Vendetta is an attempt at reproducing a book's story into visual interest. Had they actually made the entire book into a movie, you'd not have two hours on your hands, but perhaps SIX full hours. [***SPOILERS***] Many of the events were crossed out to squeeze the movie into something as short as possible, while remaining entertaining. What REALLY MATTERED about this movie's success, was that it STAYED loyal to its origins. Not that it entered the norms of literacy and whatever other crap some of you may complain about. In terms of cinematography, this movie blends in together theatrical pleasure and drama perfectly well. You might as well feel that most scenes are shot much like a Shakespearian play. (I'm gonna get flamed for this one in the future) You may be called simplistic by some pseudo-intellectual people for liking this movie. But what counts is not the quantity of references you may attach to it. It's the quality of them. The movie stayed true to the book in many facts, aside that it replaced the past of the book with today. Instead of the Cold War ending with general nuclear warfare, it was America's war on Iraq which spread out too much for its own good. It's not very likely to happen, but the movie reflects "what ifs". Other people may even complain about not understanding a thing that is said. Those people just are looking for a typical action movie, where nearly no acting is given and more gunning and killing occurs. V justified every fighting sequence, and made them count into the storyline. Now, remember dear children of cinematography: You're not looking for pure masterpieces when watching a movie. You're looking for entertainment and something of VISUAL and AUDITIVE quality. You may discuss politics when watching the news, otherwise you are just messing with the useless. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
2
JamesQ.Aug 19, 2006
Catholic fascists take over England, put up big black and red crosses, repress gays, execute people for possessing the Koran, and rule by fear. Only a masked wierdo can save them. He does this by--well, that would ruin it. Suffice it to say, Catholic fascists take over England, put up big black and red crosses, repress gays, execute people for possessing the Koran, and rule by fear. Only a masked wierdo can save them. He does this by--well, that would ruin it. Suffice it to say, the ending is absurd. Written by the Wachowski brothers and produced by Joel Silver. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
9
JaeheeK.Aug 17, 2006
Its the first of its kind. I gave it a 9 because i was moved by it. Not because i thought any of this could become a reality, but simply V himself and his enigmatic history, and the power and intellect he posseses. V is not a servant of the Its the first of its kind. I gave it a 9 because i was moved by it. Not because i thought any of this could become a reality, but simply V himself and his enigmatic history, and the power and intellect he posseses. V is not a servant of the people like other heroes, he is one driven by a vendetta hence creating a highly unique movie. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
JohnN.Aug 16, 2006
Hard to imagine why all of the good grades here for V. Must be an age gap, because I cant think of any reason why anyone over 21 would like this movie. At least Natalie Portman is in it, but then they cut her hair and ruin that too. Very Hard to imagine why all of the good grades here for V. Must be an age gap, because I cant think of any reason why anyone over 21 would like this movie. At least Natalie Portman is in it, but then they cut her hair and ruin that too. Very shallow, undeveloped plot that takes to long to go nowhere. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful
0
AnonymousMCAug 11, 2006
Entirely self-contraticting, whoever came up with this movie and wrote the script simply wanted to make themselves seem smart by stealing real ideas from people like Orwell, but they werent smart enough to know what to do with those ideas, soEntirely self-contraticting, whoever came up with this movie and wrote the script simply wanted to make themselves seem smart by stealing real ideas from people like Orwell, but they werent smart enough to know what to do with those ideas, so they just used a bunch of verbage to make it sound like they knew what they were talking about. It was hard for me to sit through this movie without tearing its "ideas" apart, and the write snuck in a couple social commentaries that had nothing to do with anything. If you think this is thought-provoking and smart, read Orwell's 1984 to find out what those words really mean. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
10
EricaJ.Aug 11, 2006
I love that they have it so right. If the american governent continues it's way...controlling people with fear..this may become a reality.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
RobR.Aug 11, 2006
This is a simple movie for children, posing as "art". It takes more than a 130 minute running time to make a movie compelling. You'd have thought that after the dreadful Matrix sequels, the Wachowski brothers would have realised that.
0 of 2 users found this helpful
8
DanC.Aug 8, 2006
Excellent as entertainment and spectacle. The political message is not a clear or particularly compelling one, given that the story requires Total Evil from one side. Still, an involving and in many ways eerily moving film.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
RitaG.Aug 7, 2006
It is about time - Finally a good movie worth watching and reminds me of curtain situations going on now....Thanks for making a good movie they are far and few.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
AnonymousMCAug 6, 2006
An intriguing political thriller, with a touch of Matrix gloss. I miss the Matrix trilogy's action, but this movie has a greater focus on its moral and societal ideals, a focus so great that the whole movie just encapsulates you. MakesAn intriguing political thriller, with a touch of Matrix gloss. I miss the Matrix trilogy's action, but this movie has a greater focus on its moral and societal ideals, a focus so great that the whole movie just encapsulates you. Makes you think we REALLY need a hero like V, with a revolt to match.

A few problems, though:
1) V using torture to covert Portman? Feels a bit morally incoherent and pro-totalitarian, contradictory to the movie's goal. Offended me a little.
2) Action a bit light in supply, probably due to a constrained $50 million dollar budget, where as the Matrix reloaded had $127 million at its disposal. They do the best with what they have, though. And it's unlikely that rich studio execs would heap $120+ million on a film that preaches politics that threaten to cut their wealth, anyway.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
DaveK.Aug 4, 2006
Great movie! Great story and they presented it, I think, perfectly. A good action movie, with "matrix-like" elements, and a story that makes you think. Resembles WW2 nazi Germany. Natalie Portman was great too.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
AlecB.Aug 3, 2006
very good plot and lots of action.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
NateW.Aug 2, 2006
Artistically rich with a unique protagonist. Though the ending is predictable the route taken to it isn't.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
JosakAug 2, 2006
I thought the movie was a little bland. It had an interesting story and some cool ideas, but I thought the execution was off. Still worth seeing though.
0 of 1 users found this helpful
8
TimothyP.Aug 1, 2006
Wonderful movie, makes you think!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
ElizabethK.Aug 1, 2006
The language that V employs in the movie alone makes it worth the watch. It is definently one of the best movies I have seen made in a long while.
1 of 1 users found this helpful
3
MikeAug 1, 2006
The movie started out badly and it ended even worse!! An intresting idea, but badly excuted.
0 of 2 users found this helpful
10
LenC.Aug 1, 2006
Best movie I've seen in a long time. Intellectual and riveting. A smart movie with lots of action.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
AaronG.Jul 28, 2006
I have never posted a movie review before but this film was so inspiring and relevant that I I must register my vote. The hero represents an ideal whose spirit we can only hope to adopt.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JimJ.Jul 13, 2006
Very entertaining, great story and great acting.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
CLJul 13, 2006
to Mr. RM:

perhaps if you had finished watching this film instead of leaving to go home and get hard over SAW (clever, but stupidly violent movie) for the millionth time you may have been able to appreciate the depth of this film. The fact
to Mr. RM:

perhaps if you had finished watching this film instead of leaving to go home and get hard over SAW (clever, but stupidly violent movie) for the millionth time you may have been able to appreciate the depth of this film. The fact that you can: A) call it a dumb film without even seeing the end of it and B) classify anything as "Dumb" like a 5 year old would mearly proves that this film was not "Dumn" simply you are too simple minded and sadistic to understand it. I thought this was a great movie and is probably one of the only movies that has actually made me think about it beyond the cinema door.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
EmeryN.Jul 6, 2006
One of the best films I have ever seen.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
PaulOJun 23, 2006
"One of the best movies I've seen in a while". - I actually said that to my girlfriend as I was walking out of the theater. And I was referring to any new movie that's been released. IMO, better than Capote, Crash, or any other"One of the best movies I've seen in a while". - I actually said that to my girlfriend as I was walking out of the theater. And I was referring to any new movie that's been released. IMO, better than Capote, Crash, or any other Oscar nominee from last year (DEFINITELY better than Brokeback Mountain). It's kind of a long movie but it held my interest until the end. Go see it! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
RMJun 18, 2006
I do not want to sound over the top and completely slag this film off but it is officially the third time I walked out of a film because it got embarassing to watch (the last was AI). I thought it would be interesting because I quite enjoyed I do not want to sound over the top and completely slag this film off but it is officially the third time I walked out of a film because it got embarassing to watch (the last was AI). I thought it would be interesting because I quite enjoyed books such as '1984', 'Clockwork Orange' and 'Brave New World', all set in dystopian sociaties, but thought this was a really dumb effort, and it's almost laughable that people can even respond to the message that the film conveys when it is done by such silly means. Perhaps then I can enjoy the action, acting, settings etc instead. Well no actually. The action scenes were just as ridiculous as 'The Matrix' which is partly why I cannot take it seriously. And the acting was some of the worst I have ever seen. I appreciate when people hate a film and write a review they tend to say the acting is bad even if it isn't because they're in rant mode. But here it really is. English people really don't talk like that - i.e. they don't all sound like snobs. The way English accents are done in Hollywood films can be terrible. It was just all very unconvincing and cringeworthy at parts. So not only is the message ruined by how unrealistic it all is, it is difficult to enjoy the story when you are constantly reminded that the characters are all just actors trying to put on a silly accent. Seriously, the British accents here are almost suitable for a comedy. To mention a few postives. There were the odd funny moments - it was not taking itself to seriously thank god. Some of the visuals were also quite impressive. And, in fairness, maybe the actors were not actually that bad and it was just the rubbish dialogue that made them seem like they were. It is a dumb film that wants to be clever but not everyone is like me and enjoys dumb clever films anyway. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful
9
JohnD.Jun 14, 2006
A must see for anyone concerned about our democracy.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
ClarisseP.Jun 12, 2006
One word: Excellent. Strong message, great actors, wonderful scenes. I love it .
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
MohammedR.Jun 9, 2006
Excellent movie with a strong message. One can not ask for a better movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
LukeD.Jun 3, 2006
a quixotic piece of orwellian gargage. watching this movie is like eating bananas without peeling them.
0 of 2 users found this helpful
8
NooraB.May 25, 2006
Visually beautiful, with excellent actors and interesting plot. What I don't like is the fact that so many critics are looking at the story as criticism on today's society when it should be viewed in the 80's context as a Visually beautiful, with excellent actors and interesting plot. What I don't like is the fact that so many critics are looking at the story as criticism on today's society when it should be viewed in the 80's context as a statement on the inhumanity of the Thatcherist politics. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
daveh.May 12, 2006
Breath taking film best film seen in a long time.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
LydMay 11, 2006
By far the best film I've seen in over a year. Thought provoking and controversial, backed up with exceptional acting. The film has a unique story line and brilliant characters!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
MyronB.May 10, 2006
Somewhat better than run-of-the-mill comic book action, somewhat worse than Sin City and even X-Men, this is a pastiche of explicitly borrowed elements -- as though some writer thought it would be real cool to insert The Crow into Somewhat better than run-of-the-mill comic book action, somewhat worse than Sin City and even X-Men, this is a pastiche of explicitly borrowed elements -- as though some writer thought it would be real cool to insert The Crow into Orwell's 1984, with a sprinkle of post-modernity -- no wonder the Wachowskis drooled over it. Unoriginal and shallow but mildly pretentioous, with great camera work and editing, just like the Matrix. Whomever this "resonates" with, they're sorely simplistic. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
9
JimM.Apr 30, 2006
Compelling and moving. Maybe it hits too close to home for some, who would rather ignore the parallels with today's politcal climate.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JayDeeApr 28, 2006
*
Anyone giving this movie anything below a 7 should be put into
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
JMApr 22, 2006
"V" is unsatisfying as an action flick and laughably facile as a "thought-provoker". All the cleverness here is placed in the margins -- the details of V's art collection, the mentioned-in-passing political backstory -- leaving the "V" is unsatisfying as an action flick and laughably facile as a "thought-provoker". All the cleverness here is placed in the margins -- the details of V's art collection, the mentioned-in-passing political backstory -- leaving the central plot to flounder with "philosophical" dialog between V and Portman's Evey that seems like a rehash of every late-night dorm-room bull session you've ever had. The intended "controversy" over the fact that V is a "justified terrorist" who blows things up to make a point is lost as V's escapades are somehow bloodless towards civilians while the authorities manage to kill dozens of innocents trying to stop him. Portman seems lost here while Weaving is wasted behind the mask; Stephen Rea's standout performance is nearly ruined by the weirdly-anticlimactic ending. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
9
SeanApr 18, 2006
A great movie. Anyone who likes comics like the watchmen (alan moore) will love this movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
BobbyApr 17, 2006
I really liked V for Vendetta. It is probably the best film playing in theatres right now. I recommend everybody to go see it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
ChrisU.Apr 16, 2006
This movie had some good acting. This movie had an interesting premise. This movie neglected to share many of the details of how V is able to do what he does. This movie becomes redundant at times. This movie left me with mixed emotions.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
BobbyJ.Apr 15, 2006
Fantastic! Love the movies from start to finish! Go see it!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
SeanR.Apr 13, 2006
What a great movie! Everything i like about it has been said by other people but was anyone else really dissapointed by Natalie Portman's performance? I really liked her in star wars, closer and garden state but what happend to her in What a great movie! Everything i like about it has been said by other people but was anyone else really dissapointed by Natalie Portman's performance? I really liked her in star wars, closer and garden state but what happend to her in this movie? Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JoeM.Apr 11, 2006
Instead of portraying what the world (or more precisely, the American government) is like today, this movie warns of what it could become if people were to blindly follow the orders of today's leaders. It is a comparison between this Instead of portraying what the world (or more precisely, the American government) is like today, this movie warns of what it could become if people were to blindly follow the orders of today's leaders. It is a comparison between this future government and the government the Nazi party imposed on countries they conquered. It is also a tribute to Guy Fawkes and the power of symbolism. And the knife-play is excellent. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
DSApr 10, 2006
A great movie, for people who didn't read the novel, and amazing visuals for those who did. Gritty & good.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
CraigR.Apr 10, 2006
Truly brilliant. Great acting, a superb story and themes.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
MikeD.Apr 9, 2006
I totally enjoyed this movie. Also frightened me as it should frighten everyone. I see evidence every day of our society moving closer and closer to this very situation. Too real. I think this movie accomplished what it set out to do.
0 of 1 users found this helpful
10
DanielG.Apr 9, 2006
Just a beautiful movie from the cinematographic point of view, it also made one ponder many things about government and a how bad it must be before it is right to use violence to stop it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful