True Grit

8

LiveForeverFeb 25, 2011

Glad to see the Coen Brothers return to form after last year's rather silly and aimless "A Serious Man". "True Grit" was not quite what I expected, much less an action western or a machismo canon as a film about character development andGlad to see the Coen Brothers return to form after last year's rather silly and aimless "A Serious Man". "True Grit" was not quite what I expected, much less an action western or a machismo canon as a film about character development and writing. As with any Coen Brothers we get several scenes of hilarious and quirky dialogue, which I highly enjoy from them. Bridges was good but not his best (I thought his voice was a bit much), and Damon continues to impress in his varied roles. I came into the movie thinking Hailee Steinfeld would be cheesy and over-the-top, but I think she really held her own and gave strong believability to the feisty young main character. A well deserved Oscar nod in her case, much like Jennifer Lawrence in "Winter's Bone". The soundtrack was FANTASTIC, as was some of the subtle ironic cinematography. My main complaints are in the the ending, Bridge's voice, and the seemingly pointless behavior of some of the characters (often a complaint I have with some Coen Brothers characters). Nevertheless, a good addition to their filmography, and a welcoming addition to Western Cinema.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

harlthegr8Jul 8, 2011

I only have 2 complaints: Some of the dialogue was difficult to understand in places, although the parts I was unable to discern were not likely necessary to understand the plot. Secondly, The ending was rather abrupt for my liking. It seemedI only have 2 complaints: Some of the dialogue was difficult to understand in places, although the parts I was unable to discern were not likely necessary to understand the plot. Secondly, The ending was rather abrupt for my liking. It seemed that once they found Chaney, the movie was finished in a matter of minutes. I felt like Josh Brolin was in the movie for 3-4 minutes total to me.

Those critics who gave this movie bad reviews because it wasn't close enough to the original really frustrate me. Why would anyone want a new movie to copy an old one frame for frame? I thought the movie held true to the the values and driving characteristics of the original, while taking liberties of adding in variations of their views of the story. Overall, I thought it was an excellent western worth watching over and over.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

T-AJun 18, 2011

True Grit is a great remake and remarkable addition to the trend of new Westerns. All the performances are genuine and engaging, but Matt Damon steals the show as the **** Texas Ranger, LaBoeuf. Jeff Bridges' incomprehensible garbleTrue Grit is a great remake and remarkable addition to the trend of new Westerns. All the performances are genuine and engaging, but Matt Damon steals the show as the **** Texas Ranger, LaBoeuf. Jeff Bridges' incomprehensible garble compliments his ill-tempered and intemperate Rooster Cogburn. And Hailee Steinfeld makes the precocious Mattie Ross most likable of all. Scenes of short, sudden violence add realism to the film, especially in a time which physics-defying, CGI gunfights are the norm. Longtime fans of John Wayneâ… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

RoscoeYJun 28, 2011

I may not have seen all that many westerns to compare True Grit, but maybe that's for the best. True Grit is an extraordinary western film that gets the tone and atmosphere right. It immerses you into the world that it puts you in and weavesI may not have seen all that many westerns to compare True Grit, but maybe that's for the best. True Grit is an extraordinary western film that gets the tone and atmosphere right. It immerses you into the world that it puts you in and weaves a decently interesting tale too. The entire cast does a great job with this movie, they had me truly believe that they were actually form that time period. The redemption story is done pretty well and it's a good central driving force that keeps the plot moving forward. Jeff Bridges does a good job as the US marshal Rooster Cogburn. Matt Damon also does a great job with his character a Texas Ranger named LaBoeuf. The most surprising performance came from the new comer, Hailee Steinfeld who caries most of the film. Steinfeld does a great job as the lead character, it's pretty impressive. I guess my only complaint with the film is that there are a few pacing issues, there were times when i admittedly began to wander off wondering when something would happen. Just as soon as boredom would set in, though, an action scene or an argument between the characters would break out and would instantly snap me back into the film. As a western film this movie succeeds, it may not be the most action packed film but then again it really doesn't need to be.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

TheDaveHimselfJul 13, 2011

Solid western that I would easily say is better than the original (sorry, Duke). Fantastic acting all around (Barry Pepper didn't get the credit he deserved) and the Coen's weave poetry in every inch the camera touches. Great film.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

grandpajoe6191Sep 21, 2011

The Coen Brothers succeed in crushing the original 1969's and establish their own profound, ethnic translation of the western movie "True Grit". They erase the 'exaggeration' in western cinema and rewrites it as "legend" with their hands.The Coen Brothers succeed in crushing the original 1969's and establish their own profound, ethnic translation of the western movie "True Grit". They erase the 'exaggeration' in western cinema and rewrites it as "legend" with their hands. Followed with the Oscar worthy performances from Damon and Bridges, "True Grit" is overall decent (In the standard of the Coens) but a efficient, well made western movie.… Expand

5 of 6 users found this helpful51

All this user's reviews

8

ZilcellMar 2, 2012

I don't usually watch a lot of westerns, but this one was good. A great story really the only thing you can talk about, but thats not a bad thing by any means.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

ReviewCriticFeb 19, 2012

One of the great new westerns. Great directing, a good storyline, and great acting make this movie a worthwhile trip. Jeff Bridges and Hailee Steinfeld were both great in their own different ways, and Matt Damon was good as well. Even betterOne of the great new westerns. Great directing, a good storyline, and great acting make this movie a worthwhile trip. Jeff Bridges and Hailee Steinfeld were both great in their own different ways, and Matt Damon was good as well. Even better than the classic original!… Expand

5 of 6 users found this helpful51

All this user's reviews

8

Boozerx7Mar 24, 2012

The movie starts of at very slow pace but slowly gathers momentum. the movie centres around a girl who just lost her father to a brutal murder and she vows to exact revenge on the murderer with the help of a marshal and a ranger. superbThe movie starts of at very slow pace but slowly gathers momentum. the movie centres around a girl who just lost her father to a brutal murder and she vows to exact revenge on the murderer with the help of a marshal and a ranger. superb performances by hailee steinfeld. Jeff bridges once again performed superbly alongside matt damon. For action movie goers, this is not the movie for you. A brilliant western movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

beingryanjudeSep 3, 2014

True Grit is... well, just that: truly gritty. Leave it to Joel and Ethan Coen to take an average old western and make it into a new cinematic classic. And give it up for Jeff Bridges and Matt Damon!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Trev29Jul 12, 2013

A great movie with some outstanding acting. A simple story that carries great depth. The Coen Brothers really understand how to craft a movie. A western that shines in a genre that is presumably gone. They have reinvented it.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

cameronmorewoodNov 7, 2012

The Cohen brothers couldn't disappoint me if they tried. True Grit is beautifully made and acted very well. Watch out for this one when the cinematography Oscar is announced.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Compi24Nov 28, 2012

There's some supreme directorial work here, but "True Grit" is most notably carried high by its collection of pristine performances.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

ag10Jan 12, 2013

True Grit. WOW! This movie was very enjoyable to watch. It had some comedy, some drama, some action and some thrill! Very good motion picture. The story was good, but I felt it was a bit straight forward and predictable. And withoutTrue Grit. WOW! This movie was very enjoyable to watch. It had some comedy, some drama, some action and some thrill! Very good motion picture. The story was good, but I felt it was a bit straight forward and predictable. And without subtitles, Jeff Bridges was quite hard to understand. But it overall it was a great movie!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

mds03Mar 20, 2013

So much better than the original! It's way more realistic and way more entertaining. The performances were all great especially Jeff Bridges. The story moves a lot faster than the old one and these actors seem to fit their roles a lot betterSo much better than the original! It's way more realistic and way more entertaining. The performances were all great especially Jeff Bridges. The story moves a lot faster than the old one and these actors seem to fit their roles a lot better than the actors in the original. My favorite part was the climax. It was so much more satisfying than the old True Grit's sappy last 5 minutes. In this ending, nothing is completely happy and forced. It's cool how it doesn't explain Matt Damon's fate. That makes the ending way cooler when you don't know what happens to every single character.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

willkulkaNov 30, 2013

One of the Coen Brothers' best pieces of work. As always, it includes the Brothers' signature dark humor and clever plot progression. The film is very culturally accurate and ties you into the story to keep your attention for the full 2 hours.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

JwvJan 9, 2014

One thing we can expect from a Coen brothers' movie is strong character building and performance. And True Grit does not disappoint at all. The characters are generally strong and feel unique. However, Mattie stands out on a shining pedestal.One thing we can expect from a Coen brothers' movie is strong character building and performance. And True Grit does not disappoint at all. The characters are generally strong and feel unique. However, Mattie stands out on a shining pedestal. Her performance is strong and her character although difficult to bring very convincing. Notable too is the performance of Jeff Bridges, who succeeds in setting down true grit.

A great movie, nice landscapes, nice historical research, but the story is surprisingly simple (nothing like Lebowski here) and predictable, and would not convince without good actor performances.

If you liked the movie, you should read the western novel 'True Grit' by Charles Portis.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

jools123Aug 6, 2014

This movie saw the Coen bros. at there best. This movie was masterfully crafted and acted. This may have even surpassed the classic, which is hard to do, but if anyone can do it, the Coen brothers can. This winning multiple Oscar nominations,This movie saw the Coen bros. at there best. This movie was masterfully crafted and acted. This may have even surpassed the classic, which is hard to do, but if anyone can do it, the Coen brothers can. This winning multiple Oscar nominations, including best picture, best actor (Jeff Bridges), and best supporting actress (Hailee Stienfeld). Loved this Coen brothers remake!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

AproxxAug 10, 2018

The ending wasn't as philosophical as the one in No Country. Its more kind of comic book movie ending... Some casualties, but the heroes won
(Here, her arm, the horse, the fact she never saw neither of those two again)
But the movie wasThe ending wasn't as philosophical as the one in No Country. Its more kind of comic book movie ending... Some casualties, but the heroes won
(Here, her arm, the horse, the fact she never saw neither of those two again)

But the movie was better balanced between action and dialogue, which makes it much better for me (because I get tired of tooo muuuuch action) and probably worse for some (basically, Fast and Furious lovers... just kidding?).

Hailee was just insanely good. Matt Damon was awesome too.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

TSM13Apr 6, 2017

True Grit began on the slow-side, but only to prepare the storyline for the confrontations and searching that takes place along the journey. The movie opens with a beautiful picture of a quiet small town, and continues with superb qualityTrue Grit began on the slow-side, but only to prepare the storyline for the confrontations and searching that takes place along the journey. The movie opens with a beautiful picture of a quiet small town, and continues with superb quality throughout the entire length of the film. Jeff Bridges had a brilliant southern accent as Sherif Cogburn, and Matt Damon did an incredible job with a supporting role as the duo's apprentice sidekick. It takes the whole movie for the characters to reveal how much grit they're willing to overcome so justice can be obtained.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

eded9999Aug 29, 2022

A harsh movie about 3 harsh person
Very nice, specially the characters, that's what hold the entire movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

DawdlingPoetNov 21, 2021

I liked Mattie Ross's (played by Hailee Steinfeld) self assuredness, her confidence and ability to stand up for herself perhaps better than some may expect of a young teenage girl in the times of the true old wild west. Its a sobering watchI liked Mattie Ross's (played by Hailee Steinfeld) self assuredness, her confidence and ability to stand up for herself perhaps better than some may expect of a young teenage girl in the times of the true old wild west. Its a sobering watch at times, with a variety of characters. Its quite tense, atmospheric and reasonably quiet at times, with the noise of the wind blowing being quite clearly heard. It has a sombre and mysterious feel to it which I quite liked too. Its safe to say there's plenty of time for viewers to contemplate the fate of the various characters, namely Reuben Cogburn (played well by Jeff Bridges) and Mattie Ross.

This is certainly not in any way a sentimental re-telling of the wild west, so its not quite 'Oh Brother, Where Art Thou?' territory, although this is a Coen brothers film. As Westerns go, I thought this was quite a good one. Worth a watch.

The music played isn't especially noticeable but I suppose it does add to the sense of atmosphere during scenes in which we see the main characters trekking across the land. I suppose this is a film about finding out other peoples true characters, putting trust in to others, whether for right or for wrong. I enjoyed it overall.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

NickTheCritickNov 2, 2021

This is a good remake of this new adaptation of the famous book. I have a slight spot for this over the Hathaway 1969 movie but Coen are amongst my favourite directors ever. It's a great western as Coen brothers are always a safe bet whenThis is a good remake of this new adaptation of the famous book. I have a slight spot for this over the Hathaway 1969 movie but Coen are amongst my favourite directors ever. It's a great western as Coen brothers are always a safe bet when they make westerns.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

Frmz84Dec 28, 2010

Pretty solid western flick. The most surprising thing about this movie is that it felt like it was made 20 years ago and doesn't really change up the western formula. Thought we were in for a new/modern twist on westerns, but it's a prettyPretty solid western flick. The most surprising thing about this movie is that it felt like it was made 20 years ago and doesn't really change up the western formula. Thought we were in for a new/modern twist on westerns, but it's a pretty cliche story. Jeff Bridges is pretty funny and the little action you actually see is entertaining. One thing that I didn't enjoy was the western slang. I just didn't have the patience to dissect what they were saying and at times i just zoned out to the conversation. In particular, the trial scene kind of went on and on and I didn't understand half the things they said. Maybe that's just me..

Enjoyable and re-watchable for sure. Coming from a guy who didn't like "No Country for Old Men" I'd say that's a win.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

7

ShiiraJan 8, 2011

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The original "True Grit", directed by Henry Hathaway, and starring, no less than "The Duke" himself, made its initial theatrical run in 1969, just two years after Arthur Penn's "Bonnie and Clyde" blew away the production code. Once Warren Beatty and Faye Dunaway went down spasmodically in a hail of gunfire, that was that, and there would be blood forevermore. No more smuggling. The days of "beating around the bush" were over. No more fade to black. You could "hump the hostess". In Elia Kazan's "Baby Doll", released in 1956, smack dab in the middle of a sexually repressed era, the handcuffed filmmaker somehow managed to adapt "27 Wagons Full of Cotton", the Tennessee Williams play that depicted a middle-aged man's eroticization of his underage wife, without getting arrested on indecency charges. While neither Archie Lee(Karl Malden) nor Silva(Eli Wallach) get anywhere near first base with the titular character(Carroll Baker) in the official narrative, the first generation Italian does have implied sex with her, twice, suggested by a phallic symbol in one instance, and the cotton baron's dry humping performance(while mounted on her hobby horse) in another. Whereas "Baby Doll" predictably focuses on the man's needs, and likewise, in the John Wayne vehicle, LaBoeuf's libido is on display when he expresses his wish to kiss Mattie Ross(Kim Darby), this seemingly square western, with the utmost subtlety, delves into the fourteen-year-old girl's growing pains, in which her crush on the Texas Ranger runs deeper than the stealing glances she aims his way at the boarding house dinner table. When LaBoeuf inquires Mattie about her name, the young girl excuses herself from his company and adjourns to bed. Away from the menfolk, the recently bereaved girl and the boarding house owner gab about the strapping young lad, both agreeing, do the smitten pair, that the federal marshal is handsome. Before the lights are turned out, the girl cries, the waterworks being attributed to her slain father, no doubt, but also, perhaps, out of guilt, for feeling the first pangs of lust. Suggested by the snake pit she later falls into, in all likelihood, Mattie touched herself. There's a sin involved, but it can't be murder, since Cheney(Jeff Corey) is still breathing after the recoil due to Mattie's firing, which only grazes his head, so the snake bite that the girl endures must correspond to some earlier transgression. (Rooster Cogburn kills Cheney. John Wayne has to be the hero, even a deeply flawed one.) In the remake, Mattie pays for the self-induced orgasm with her hand. Seen as an adult, the moviegoer can't help but perceive Mattie's missing appendage as a scarlet limb. Unlike the original, it's Cogburn(Jeff Bridges) whom Mattie(Hailee Steinfeld) admires, initially anyways, as indicated by her divulgence to LaBoeuf(Matt Damon) that she had chosen the wrong man. Bridges' rendering of the one-eyed marshal contains none of the inappropriate feelings that may have stirred in his predecessor's heart. As Mattie bandages the Texas Ranger's hand at the McAllister homestead, Cogburn appears miffed by her charity. Why? Does he have sex on his mind? Maybe. Because Darby was twenty-two at the time, to a certain extent, "True Grit" could get away with its pedophilic undertones. Conversely, Steinfeld is age-appropriate, so when Damon repeats Campbell's line about stealing kisses, he comes across more strongly as a child molester. The filmmaker leaves out Wayne's original comment about LaBoeuf "enjoying it too much"; the Texan's spanking of Mattie's behind, probably out of fear that the hunting party would resemble some sort of unseemly threesome, a malodorous "Jules & Jim" playing wet nurse to a lolita. Ultimately, the most striking feature about this otherwise well-dressed mounting of the ultimate John Wayne experience("The Searchers" was John Ford's bag) is its political incorrectness, or rather, the arch self-awareness that many westerns were shameless in their depiction of Native Americans. Right away, "True Grit" announces itself as the anti-"Dances with Wolves", in which an Indian's speech is cut-off by the executioner's hooding of the tribesman, disturbingly enough, to comic effect, just before he dangles at the public hanging. Later, at the site of an abandoned house, the liquored up law officer kicks two small "red-skinned" children off from the structure's wooden foundation without any protestation from his female companion. (Mattie names her horse Blackie in front of a "Negro" stable-boy.) In another sense, Mattie loses her fingers because she didn't lift a single finger to stop the needless cruelty of those innocents.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

SausageFeb 12, 2011

This movie is as standard as westerns get: from grumpy cowboys to beautiful scenery to countless gun battles and to the tales of a time long forgotten!! What sets it apart however is the quest for vengeance by a young tough as nails heroineThis movie is as standard as westerns get: from grumpy cowboys to beautiful scenery to countless gun battles and to the tales of a time long forgotten!! What sets it apart however is the quest for vengeance by a young tough as nails heroine who just happens to be 12!!!She holds the movie togethor and although she doesnt let us into her cold as stone interior, we understand her and feel fer her. Jeff Bridges and Matt Damon are equals unto each other and the banter between all is masterfully handeled by the Coen Brothers. The movie is dark, gritty and moves along at a steady gallop and builds to a satisfying finale. The master stroke for me however was how the ending reminded me that as with all of our lives...our biggest adventures are simply a page or a chapter and nothing more!!!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

jeremypDec 28, 2010

Iâ

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

7

StevieGJDJan 4, 2011

This retelling is darker and deeper than the 1969 John Wayne version. Both films are adapted from the same novel, and have basically the same general plot. But the new Cohen brothers film is, for me, a far more interesting film. The threeThis retelling is darker and deeper than the 1969 John Wayne version. Both films are adapted from the same novel, and have basically the same general plot. But the new Cohen brothers film is, for me, a far more interesting film. The three main actors (Bridges, Damon and Steinfeld) are well cast and do a great job. The cinematography is wonderful, as are all the technical elements. The limitations of this film are the limitations of the source material - the story is what it is. This is a "hunt down the bad guy western," a genre which has great potential for excitement and character development (this film has both), but also usually great potential for an ending that is unfullfilling (which this film also has). This is a good movie, but not in the category of "Unforgiven," for example.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

7

RyanGeeDec 27, 2010

Underneath the drawn out tension of the Coen's Brothers remake True Grit, is a subtle and lighthearted emotion led by the break out performance of Hailee Steinfeld. If you are expecting the eccentric storytelling and essential rawness seen inUnderneath the drawn out tension of the Coen's Brothers remake True Grit, is a subtle and lighthearted emotion led by the break out performance of Hailee Steinfeld. If you are expecting the eccentric storytelling and essential rawness seen in Fargo or No Country For Old Men, True Grit is ultimately uninspiring. But in this effort, the Coen brothers smooth out their usual sharp edges, in order to make a film that is pure and an effective homage to a once prominent genre in film.

True Grit as stated earlier, is a remake of John Hathaway's 1969 film starring John Wayne, which led to the legendary actor's only Oscar. After her father's death, we follow Mattie Ross (Hailee Steinfeld) , a precocious 14-year old who seeks retribution on the murderer John Chaney (Josh Brolin). Mattie decides to hire U.S Marshall Rooster Cogburn (Jeff Bridges) because of his merciless manner in dealing with the law. At the beginning of the hunt, Cogburn decides to team up with Texas Ranger LeBeouf (Matt Damon) in this often humorous and gritty journey.

While Bridges and Damon both put on respectable performances-with Bridges putting on a different twist to Wayne's character- it is newcomer Hailee Steinfeld who steals the show. Steinfeld's puts intensity and zeal into her character that emphasizes her independence and her presumptuous manner. The Coen brothers put more focus into Steinfeld's character rather than Bridge's Cogburn. I find this a wise decision as the film is able to blend an affable feeling with the somewhat dark humor reminiscent in Barton Fink or Fargo. While True Grit provides great performances, it is not the action adventure that its advertisements imply that it is. Rather, the film is extremely talky, which is one of the few film techniques similar to the Coens' previous efforts. This is not necessarily a bad aspect, as most of the lines are derived from the Charles Portis novel that the film is adapting. In other words, the dialogue still remains humorous and intriguing, but it lacks the action and zest of a contemporary Western. As a result, there is a whole lot of drawn out tension that is only somewhat released by the end. Overall, True Grit is visually beautiful and packs a punch in great acting. But as I have to emphasize again, the film is essentially a disappointing Coen film, but is a solid remake to a classic film.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

7

Ruler101Jan 5, 2011

This movie was a good take on a "new age" western. Some of the terms were not of that of the time but I think the story kept moving. The humor was good in parts and others weren't so hot but over time it stuck onto you. The scenery was greatThis movie was a good take on a "new age" western. Some of the terms were not of that of the time but I think the story kept moving. The humor was good in parts and others weren't so hot but over time it stuck onto you. The scenery was great and well used in each of the scenes. Overall I thought this movie was entertaining and a good movie for people to enjoy.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

7

DarkZXJan 8, 2011

I took my friend on a date to see this movie, she and I both had very high expectations, given the amazing cast and the reviews I had already read about it. We enjoyed it, and when I say enjoy it I don't mean we thought it was extremely good,I took my friend on a date to see this movie, she and I both had very high expectations, given the amazing cast and the reviews I had already read about it. We enjoyed it, and when I say enjoy it I don't mean we thought it was extremely good, we just enjoyed it. The acting was the biggest highlight of this movie by far. With absolutely exceptional performances by Jeff Bridges, Josh Brolin, Matt Damon and Hailee Steinfeld. The group of these four amazing actors in my opinion is what made the film.
However a good film does not come without its flaws, and in this case, this movies biggest major flaw was the slow progression of the storyline, the dull setting (It felt like it was just a dusty desert town, nothing really that drew me into the scenery. Hailee did an amazing job in her breakout role, that's the main thing I noticed, she seemed like she was an absolute natural. Continuing, as the story continued onward, I was noticing that the film was trying to draw us to the characters, make us relate to them, however it was not the cinematography that brought me closer to the characters, it was the acting of the characters themselves. However I felt at the same time that the characters themselves were undeveloped.
As for action... Well It seems as if the Coen Brothers tried a little too hard on story rather than actually having qualities that would keep people interested, because the story seemed to be strained in all cases, making it hard to watch this in the way that I personally thought the Coen Brothers wanted us to watch the film like.

All in all it was a pretty good movie, I congratulate the Coen Brothers on making a movie with this much promise and nearly living up to the expectations (acting was amazing, story.... not so much).

Final Rating: 7.2/10
Closing Words:
If you want to see amazing acting and follow the characters of this movie, go see it, if your looking for an action packed wild west gunfight cowboy brawl, this isn't for you.

If you would like more reviews like this, please sign up at http://gamerspurgatory.darkbb.com, contact me (my username is DarkZX on there as well) and say which movie/video game/music album you would like me to review.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

savagesophiaDec 22, 2010

Excellent characters brought to life by skilled actors. They have fun, we have fun. The parts are greater than the whole. With such a simple story, it would be hard for the plot to live up to the likes of Cogburn, LaBoeuf andExcellent characters brought to life by skilled actors. They have fun, we have fun. The parts are greater than the whole. With such a simple story, it would be hard for the plot to live up to the likes of Cogburn, LaBoeuf and fourteen-going-on-you're-no-matched-for-me Mattie Ross. Sadly, by the end I was left wanting more.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

7

kormac66Dec 31, 2010

Solid entertainment. Matt Damon seemed miscast. He couldn't deliver the subtle comedy the situations were presenting. But Steinfeld and Bridges were strong and the story moved along well. kept me engaged.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

Jim_SJan 2, 2011

With its amusing dialogue, engaging characters, and visually striking vistas, True Grit was not a disappointing movie, but it was a disappointing Coen brothers movie. Regression to the mean? I hope not.

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

7

MojoJan 6, 2011

Coen brothers following generics of the Old-American Western brings out a much different True Grit , than the 1969 classic. It is not experimental , it doesnâ

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

MrSteerFeb 6, 2011

Hailee Steinfeld is the outstanding performance in this movie, which has a decent plot line if you're into westerns, Bridges' interpretation of the character isn't bad and the pace of the film is fast enough to keep you entertained but notHailee Steinfeld is the outstanding performance in this movie, which has a decent plot line if you're into westerns, Bridges' interpretation of the character isn't bad and the pace of the film is fast enough to keep you entertained but not enthralled. Cinema: If you're into westerns, or fancy a change, DVD Rental: Yeah why not, but rent 3:10 to Yuma first… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

POVApr 3, 2011

Good Jeff Bridges, good Matt Damon, good Hailee Steinfield. Good cinematography, great plot. Not great linear flow-I thought it was too slow, and I wish the Coen Bros weren't so anachronistic in preserving the time period of the WesternGood Jeff Bridges, good Matt Damon, good Hailee Steinfield. Good cinematography, great plot. Not great linear flow-I thought it was too slow, and I wish the Coen Bros weren't so anachronistic in preserving the time period of the Western genre-maybe they should've modernized the length so that it would more curb out instant gratification generation?
Alas, an almost perfect film. Atta boys!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

drlowdonJun 7, 2013

I have not seen the John 60’s original so am unable to make any comparisons but judged purely on its own merits the Cohen brothers have certainly created a competent modern western. The simple story involves 14-year old girl Mattie RossI have not seen the John 60’s original so am unable to make any comparisons but judged purely on its own merits the Cohen brothers have certainly created a competent modern western. The simple story involves 14-year old girl Mattie Ross enlisting the aid of an experienced bounty hunter in order to track down the man who murdered her father.

The movie moves along at a good pace and features everything you would expect from the genre, including some brutal shoot outs. Jeff Bridges, taking on the role originally played by John Wayne, and Matt Damon are as watchable as ever but it is really Hailee Steinfeld in her first major movie role who steals the show as Mattie Ross, showing a level of maturity beyond her years and helping to hold the whole movie together.

Fans of the genre won’t be disappointed.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

LeewayJun 12, 2011

There is nothing frantic about True Grit, it's basically a good retelling of an old John Wayne movie. However, the performances keep this film high and amusing especially Hailee Steinfeld as the straight-to=the-point Mattie. True Grit mightThere is nothing frantic about True Grit, it's basically a good retelling of an old John Wayne movie. However, the performances keep this film high and amusing especially Hailee Steinfeld as the straight-to=the-point Mattie. True Grit might stand out as One of the Best Cowboy Remakes but it has its powers to stand on its own. The direction of the camera and the scenic landscapes all add depth to the film, accompanied by Carter Burwell's piano-driven score. The story is about a 14 year old girl named Mattie who wants to avenge her father's death but not without the help of a Marshal. She chooses Mr. One-Eye-Patched Rooster Cogburn played by Jeff Bridges, who manages to be convincing enough. Matt Damon and Josh Brolin also play as supporting (enemies) characters.
Ethan and Joel Coen have directed something of a miracle, normally (especially noticeable within this year, thats right...I'm looking at you Single White Female rip-off) remakes are a bad hand which is why it's a miracle because the grand cast works well and their chemistry is warm as a bottle of whiskey. 78%
It could've been more exciting but so far its a couple of steps above your normal cowboy movie. The Best Cowboy Movie So Far was and is Quigley Down Under. Still, this is an exception.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

TyranianAug 24, 2019

Really good Coen Brothers film with great performances and writing, ending a little bit lame.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

worleyjamersDec 8, 2012

Not was I was expecting. First off, this is a great film! The Coen Brothers really did a good job of adapting a remake with an identity all its own. Many critics and alot of viewers have raved about how this new version is much better thanNot was I was expecting. First off, this is a great film! The Coen Brothers really did a good job of adapting a remake with an identity all its own. Many critics and alot of viewers have raved about how this new version is much better than the original. However, I personally feel like it's not that much better than the original. This version adds alot to the story, but even with a fresh touch and interpretation, the story didn't feel all that intense nor interesting. With this being said, this fault may not even be because of the films; the story is adapted from a book. That's really my only sort of negative thing about the film. I was led on to believe this new version is tons better than the original, but I liked them both about the same.

A thing that stands out instantly about this film is the incredible cinematography. The setting and scenery is stunning. Props to the Coens for, again, finding great locations and sets that really add a deeper level to the film.

Also, I really enjoyed the acting. Jeff Bridges does a great job as Cogburn. Even though John Wayne is the original Rooster Cogburn, Bridges gives a great performance that genuinely portrays the character while still giving another aspect of the character. Hailee Steinfeld also gives a strong performance. She's in every scene and steals most of them. She brilliantly portrays Mattie Ross and shows her own "grit." Bridges and Steinfeld are both worthy of their Oscar nods! Josh Brolin, although only in a few scenes, also gives a strong supporting performance. My favorite performance of the film comes from Matt Damon. He delivers yet another strong performance. I really enjoyed it! Even though this review may seem harsh, I really really liked this film. 2010 was a strong year for movies and True Grit is among the best. I recommend this film to everyone!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

RayzorMooseNov 20, 2013

New grit is true to its roots.
The film is a near perfect copy of its original. The acting is good except Jeff Bridges is hard to understand at times, and the movie is paced equally well to its predecessor. A great adaption overall.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

The3AcademySinsOct 31, 2018

The Coen Brother's spin on True Grit is a darker tale than the original, with it's own message to tell. The balance of honoring the original film and bringing new things to the table is done quite well here. All of the performances are great.The Coen Brother's spin on True Grit is a darker tale than the original, with it's own message to tell. The balance of honoring the original film and bringing new things to the table is done quite well here. All of the performances are great. There really is not a weak link in the cast. The cinematography is honestly impeccable. The silence of this film is handled with the utmost care. The only complaint that I have is that the Baroqian take on the language in the film comes off as clunky, and occasionally takes the steam out of an otherwise stirring scene. All in all, this is a great western that does deserve to be watched.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

amheretojudgeJun 1, 2018

breeds essential sentiments in its self-created grittiness..

True Grit Carrying out one's typical textbook western theme and offers it a familiar tale to feed on the audience for almost around 110 minutes, is no ordinary job. Fortunately,breeds essential sentiments in its self-created grittiness..

True Grit

Carrying out one's typical textbook western theme and offers it a familiar tale to feed on the audience for almost around 110 minutes, is no ordinary job. Fortunately, the responsible team in here, is trustworthy and doesn't fail to deliver too. The Coen Brothers; as usual is no short on execution and this time has got appropriate editing on their side. The real game changer of the feature is their smart adaptation of Charles Portis' novel that is not only gripping but sensibly thought-provoking. The background score and the costume design is apt for the tone of the feature. The performance is strong and something that factors a lot in its favour, reason being a great star cast on its side. And addition to that, the performance given by them is appreciative too, especially by the protagonist Jeff Bridges who is supported well enough by Hailee Steinfield, Matt Damon and Josh Brolin (no matter how much runtime he gets in here). The writing is more practical than usual western feature does, as there is too much practicality involved in it that sends out this eerie vulnerable feeling in the audience for the characters. True Grit breeds essential sentiments in its self-created grittiness, but still somehow fails to draw out the anticipated emotion from the screen and the reason would be its perspective.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

zNeverSleepingAug 27, 2020

Apesar de não atender exatamente minhas expectativas, o filme me agradou.

A trama é bem direta e "seca". Não há muito foco em plots, personalidades complexas e resoluções mirabolantes. É só o que é, mas muito bem feito. Eu gostei do estilo,Apesar de não atender exatamente minhas expectativas, o filme me agradou.

A trama é bem direta e "seca". Não há muito foco em plots, personalidades complexas e resoluções mirabolantes. É só o que é, mas muito bem feito.

Eu gostei do estilo, e pude aproveitar bastante. O longa me prendeu, possuindo uma premissa simples que só dá certo mesmo por conta da Hailee Steinfeld e sua personagem. Matt Damon e Jeff Bridges estão muito bem eu seus respectivos papéis, com um destaque maior ao próprio Bridges, por conseguir entrar muito bem no personagem.

A fotografia é bela, e possui alguns planos lindíssimos. Gostei da OST também, apesar de não me chamar tanto atenção.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

glommanDec 9, 2019

A solid movie about the Wild West, although I can't remember the character's names, yet they stick out with their uniqueness, each on their own. This movie proves that Westerns are not obsolete and the setting can still be used to tellA solid movie about the Wild West, although I can't remember the character's names, yet they stick out with their uniqueness, each on their own. This movie proves that Westerns are not obsolete and the setting can still be used to tell compelling and enchanting stories.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

BroncosOwnYouJan 20, 2011

For any one to say that this version of True Grit is more faithful to the book by Charles Portis is ridiculous. This version changed just as much, if not more than the original did. I understand that the book is narrated through Mattie'sFor any one to say that this version of True Grit is more faithful to the book by Charles Portis is ridiculous. This version changed just as much, if not more than the original did. I understand that the book is narrated through Mattie's eyes but they left out so much of what made the book so great that it was almost a different story. Too many characters spoke lines in the movie that other characters in the book had actually spoken. Parts of the movie were out of order and the role of Rooster Cogburn himself was literally relegated to second fiddle.

This movie gets a 6 because it was a decent western. But if you want to watch True Grit stick with the original.

"The Dude" just couldn't pull off what the "The Duke" did over 40 years ago.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

Lambo442Jan 4, 2011

all these westerns are much the same. An injustice is done and a jaded, anti-hero type mercenary gets hired to track someone down. All a bit dull and rehashed really. The Unforgiven was the first film to use the formula and it hasn't beenall these westerns are much the same. An injustice is done and a jaded, anti-hero type mercenary gets hired to track someone down. All a bit dull and rehashed really. The Unforgiven was the first film to use the formula and it hasn't been equalled since, with the exception of maybe apaloosa, which is leagues above this film. The Coen brothers should start directing porn instead.… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

6

jredekopApr 6, 2011

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This is possibly the most anti-climatic movie I've ever seen. While it was artistically done, and both Jeff Bridges and Matt Damon put on good performances, it wasn't enough to take away from the slow story that felt like it had no ending. The 'showdown' was what could have saved this movie, but instead was nothing more Jeff Bridges running across a field on horseback, and was over within minutes. The 'climax' was really only Mattie Ross being bit by a snake. I'm not trying to sound like I wanted this movie to be 'Hollywoodized like so many movies are these days (I can respect the Coen Brothers for not selling out), but it wouldn't have killed to have put some excitement into this otherwise dreary story.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

TENCATIJADec 23, 2010

Well first off, I am a huge John Wayne fan. I have watched almost all of his movies, with this being one of my favorites. I was a little nervous on how Jeff Bridges was going to do in regards to taking on John Wayne's previous role andWell first off, I am a huge John Wayne fan. I have watched almost all of his movies, with this being one of my favorites. I was a little nervous on how Jeff Bridges was going to do in regards to taking on John Wayne's previous role and surprisingly, I thought he did a pretty good job. As a whole, I thought all of the acting was well done and particularly thought Hailee Steinfeld did an excellent job with portraying the role of Mattie Ross. I also thought some scenes were better than the original, like the scene where Rooster is trying to squeeze the information out of the two men in the cabin and one guy chops the other guys fingers off and stabs him in the heart and Rooster blows that guy's head off. I thought that seen kept the suspense moving and really moved the audience. However, I thought the first half of the movie really didn't build up the story at all and the fact that an hour of the movie took place in the town, I felt like that made the second half of the movie (the action scenes) feel rushed and we, the audience, didn't get the feeling of evil that is supposed to be portrayed through the rival gang of cowboys. The other thing that I felt really hurt the movie was the focus that was on how Rooster is a drunk. There was probably 3 different scenes that was focusing on how he's a drunk and I felt like that really hurt the plot. Overall, I thought the movie was good but most definitely not as good as the original. Hats off to you John Wayne...… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

6

criticalrangerJan 8, 2011

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The acting was brilliant. The cinematography often stunning. The story enjoyable. Joel and Ethan Coen have once again produced a visceral film, with moments of intensity (particular with the indoor scenes) and characters that are unforgettable (like that instant when the narrator is left behind with her father's killer). But there are moments that really concern you, and you wonder who it is that you're supposed to care about most. And, as a result, the film falls flat - its feels incomplete and without heart, despite the amazing quality of everything that went into its production. Would I recommend it? Absolutely - but only in the hopes that you discover what is there that I didn't see.

Admittedly, I think the best story was that told by Jeff Bridges' character. If only his was the main reason to watch the film. Haillie Steinfeld - well casted and well acted - doesn't quite fill the needs of a protagonist. You don't notice anything change in her... you don't feel anything change in her. At the end you wonder why it is that you've just watched the film - because Jeff Bridges' character would've been the best protagonist to make the film have a purpose.

As it stands it doesn't provide anything other than a story that doesn't make you feel. And that is not a good thing - even when you consider Joel and Ethan Coen's hard-style of directing and lack of interest in "feelings" in the past they have always managed to produce something more magical than this...… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

6

MrRiggsJan 9, 2011

Well...nothing beats the original True grit. This movie has a well supported cast, its the ONLY thing the movie has tho. Its well acted, the sights/sounds/horses/scenery is all fine but I just found the movie boring and somewhat just rambledWell...nothing beats the original True grit. This movie has a well supported cast, its the ONLY thing the movie has tho. Its well acted, the sights/sounds/horses/scenery is all fine but I just found the movie boring and somewhat just rambled on without much action, they could have done wayyy more with this and I have to say my expectations were somewhat high for this when I seen the trailers for it, but I have to say they make the movie far better then it is by those trailers...not bad but not the best remake of a western by far, 6/10 for me for just didnt keep me entertained throughout, didnt keep me wanting to watch it.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

CorneliusFeb 5, 2011

As a great fan of westerns I was very excited to see this picture. While the acting was universally strong, the cinematography beautiful and the look authentic the film seemed to misfire. There are several very long passages that meander andAs a great fan of westerns I was very excited to see this picture. While the acting was universally strong, the cinematography beautiful and the look authentic the film seemed to misfire. There are several very long passages that meander and are rather dull. The journey section picks the pacing up but, still there is very little suspense until the final twenty minutes. Jeff Bridges owns the role of Rooster Cogburn. He is a man's man, heroic, brave and gritty. Damon too is earnest and steadfast at Texas Ranger LaBoeuf. Newcomer Hailey Steinfeld, as Hattie Ross, truly holds her own these veteran actors. Her determination, poise and resolve are very powerful to watch, she is an engaging and compelling character. Perhaps having seen the original John Wayne version in the last year took away some of the impact. The action sequences were exciting and unverving. On the whole it was just okay. I would love to see the Coen Brothers write an original wester film. I don't think True Grit needed a re-telling, the first was less than stellar. True Grit has it's moments, but, they are few and far between.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

csw12Jul 12, 2013

The cohens are none for the creative writing and while they did a solid job with the script i just couldn't get over the fact i didn't understand what Jeff bridges was saying but hey maybe that made his part more enjoyable to watch.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

SEROJNov 24, 2016

Predictable and unexpected at the same time. Why i'm saying this, is because some scenes were really surprising. While the overall plot was predictable.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

gracjanskiApr 6, 2020

This movie is destroyed by the 14 year old wonder woman Mattie. Jeff bridges performance helps this movie a lot. the story itself is simple. There are better western movies.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

BroyaxFeb 4, 2018

Les frères Coen sont capables du meilleur et du pire mais plus souvent du pire que du meilleur, aussi est-on presque rassuré avec ce remake de 100 dollars pour un shérif qui éclipse assez facilement le film original avec John Wayne.

CommeLes frères Coen sont capables du meilleur et du pire mais plus souvent du pire que du meilleur, aussi est-on presque rassuré avec ce remake de 100 dollars pour un shérif qui éclipse assez facilement le film original avec John Wayne.

Comme dans le western initial, nous suivons une petite peste de 14 piges à la langue bien pendue qui engage un vieux marshall alcoolo et bougon pour venger son père assassiné par un salopard. Jeff Bridges qui a pris de la bouteille (et sa retraite depuis) campe ce grognard de Mathusalem avec brio et un bagout certain. La gamine effrontée tire plus ou moins son épingle du jeu mais le choix d'avoir embarqué le Matt Damon dans l'histoire est éminemment discutable...

Avec une moustache et un chapeau, Matt Damon reste en effet Matt Damon, c'est-à-dire un con qui tente de faire l'acteur sans jamais y parvenir : il plombe le film à chacune de ses apparitions. Tellement mauvais le gogo que l'écran lui-même tressaille de dépit et se met à cracher par terre dans le saloon.

L'autre souci non néglieable concerne le scénario qui se permet quelques raccourcis carrément abusés, comme s'il venait d"épingler toute son audience sur sa liste des cons ; forcément ça fait désordre... Quant à la fin, elle tire un peu trop sur les violons, contrastant ainsi bizarrement avec le ton léger qui accompagne tout le film jusque là.

La réalisation est bien léchée en tout cas et True Grit est un film bien mené, sans temps mort et sans longueurs inutiles. Bien que sensiblement perfectible, il reste un divertissement assez présentable et un western des plus corrects.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

CoreGamer1408Jun 29, 2023

As remakes go pretty good, but it is still a remake. So it loses points for originality. The ending was to dragged out and ended up way to dour for my liking.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

wiiy71Dec 30, 2017

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

clem666Mar 23, 2021

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I hate it when stories like this almost always progress by chance. They find Chaney right after everyone gives up. There are way too many moments where characters are saved in extremis by another while being confronted to insurmountable difficulties.
Gunfights are great but you will quickly get the fact that bad guys always fight with paintball guns. Good guys kill the bad ones with one bullet while La Boef's critical injury is fixed in few days. And I don't even speak about Cogburn who is able to carry Mattie even if he has a bullet in the shoulder and that his horse clearly fell on his leg.

However the story is original, characters are lovable even if the scenarists sometimes over-stereotyped them. The atmosphere is awesome, the soundtrack is great, the visuals and lighting are awesome. Acting is incredible excepting for Jeff Bridges who alwas has the same face and expression all along. Dialogues oscillate between interesting and very well written to lame and boring. There are as many successful jokes as there are unsuccessful ones.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

txrangersfan72Dec 26, 2010

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Being a huge Coen Brothers fan, I was surprised to hear they were remaking True Grit. I know they were fans of the original, but my experience with them made me believe they were going to take the original and improve it dramatically the Coen Brothers way. Well...they didn't. In fact, this was the most un-Coen Brothers movie I've ever seen. Not to say that is a bad thing, but having just watched the original, I could have not seen this version entirely and not missed anything. Being fans of the original, they clearly wanted to pay homage to the original. In fact, dialogue and setting-wise, it was about a 90% carbon copy of the original, down to the shots, the script and the way the characters were portrayed. The Coen Brothers really didn't do much to put their stamp on the film, except maybe the perfect casting. Aside from very minor differences throughout the film (such as Mattie covering the chimney to smoke out the first couple of ruffians rather than LaBoeuf and having LaBoeuf interact with Ned Pepper the first time instead of Rooster), the only meaningful change in the script is the last 30 minutes. I've never read the book, but the compliments given to this version is that it is more like the book. That must mean the ending. It is very different, and honestly, better than the original. However, anyone could have done this film the way it was done. The Coen Brothers didn't do anything to make this film special, so I'm grading it as an average film. I hope they enjoyed making it more than I enjoyed watching it and I look forward to them returning to their style soon.… Expand

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

5

emkadvFeb 10, 2011

There was much to admire about True Grit, but I found it hard to get past the amount of violence, some of it quite gratuitous. I suppose I should have known what to expect from the Coen brothers. Much of the film's dialog seemed stilted,There was much to admire about True Grit, but I found it hard to get past the amount of violence, some of it quite gratuitous. I suppose I should have known what to expect from the Coen brothers. Much of the film's dialog seemed stilted, which probably reflects the way the Coen brothers believed (possible correctly) that people spoke in the late 19th century. My wife and I were discouraged by how many of Jeff Bridges's lines were mumbled and hard to understand. I know that way of speaking fit the character, but we found it hard to follow parts of the film.

Overall, the film did seem realistic, however. I frequently found myself thinking "I'm glad I don't live in that time and place!"… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

mckillustratorDec 23, 2010

Unfortunately this movie falls short of being worthwhile. Perhaps my expectations were too high--though how could they be "too high" with Bridges, the Coens, and the western genre--but True Grit felt bland and uninspiring. It certainly wasn'tUnfortunately this movie falls short of being worthwhile. Perhaps my expectations were too high--though how could they be "too high" with Bridges, the Coens, and the western genre--but True Grit felt bland and uninspiring. It certainly wasn't a bad film but I felt no tingling sensation of mental excitement that I get after movies I really enjoyed like after that first watching of No Country, for instance. The best moments of True Grit are few and far between. Ultimately despite the fact that this film is well shot and (generally) well acted, I left the theatre disappointed. I'm still trying to figure out what or who is to blame for that feeling...because it obviously can't be me:)… Expand

5 of 13 users found this helpful58

All this user's reviews

5

dubbleqJan 14, 2011

When i give this movie a five i am being kind because the absolute stupidity of this movie is unbearable to witness. It combines stupidity and bad acting into what is nothing more than a tart fruitcake

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

5

MrC3030Jan 31, 2011

With all the hype surrounding this film: 10 Oscar Nomination, a star studded cast, blah blah blah. This film just ended up being pretty average. To be honest after seeing the trailer I had high expectations for this film , but it just seemedWith all the hype surrounding this film: 10 Oscar Nomination, a star studded cast, blah blah blah. This film just ended up being pretty average. To be honest after seeing the trailer I had high expectations for this film , but it just seemed to be a miss!!! The storyline was a little weak, and at time the film just seemed to drag along. The only bright spot in this film was the performance by 15 year old Hailee Steinfeld who in my opinion is a lock for Best Supporting Actress. Bottom this film is a snoozer so don't bother!!!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

Aiden26Feb 2, 2011

It is safe to say that I am mixed about this movie. I walked out in disappointment because it was THE Coen Bros. and i felt that something was missing. It was their second adaptive work and I can easily say that this movie made me laugh atIt is safe to say that I am mixed about this movie. I walked out in disappointment because it was THE Coen Bros. and i felt that something was missing. It was their second adaptive work and I can easily say that this movie made me laugh at it's silliness and the constant feeling of waiting for it to get going and no actor was more outstanding than the other. No one stepped out of their comfort zone to deliver a stellar and memorable performance.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

jluaFeb 27, 2011

Never has my opinion after seeing a movie been so far removed from the general buzz. In my opinion, True Grit looks like a B-movie Western, at best. It is hard for me to understand all the favorable critic reviews, other than to imagineNever has my opinion after seeing a movie been so far removed from the general buzz. In my opinion, True Grit looks like a B-movie Western, at best. It is hard for me to understand all the favorable critic reviews, other than to imagine that there was a degree of the "star-struck" factor. Because, stars there were; the track record of all the creative team is impressive. What happened, then, when they got to make this movie? It may have been the all too well-known lack of inspiration. LetÂ´s hope that is was a temporary condition, and they revert to making good films, as they have shown they can do. At least in the past.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

aznassassinJun 14, 2013

One of the most overrated movies of all time. Started brilliantly and continued to be good until they got to the antagonists...then it just went downhill from there. Had potential but they botched the climax and ending.
Only watch if you'reOne of the most overrated movies of all time. Started brilliantly and continued to be good until they got to the antagonists...then it just went downhill from there. Had potential but they botched the climax and ending.
Only watch if you're curious. Otherwise, avoid. Save your precious time for something else.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

SpangleJun 27, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I like the Coen Brothers as directors and they do a good job here as well, as do the actors, but the movie was honestly boring. I have no issue with slow movies, but the first hour plus was extremely boring. However, after LeBouef gets shot, the film certainly picked up big time. If the whole film was the second half, it would've been more of a 7, but with the beginning being about a 3, it's hard to give it any higher of a rating than I have.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

asylumspadezNov 26, 2011

The acting was pretty poor and I expected far more however the teenage girl who played opposite of Bridges was amazing and made the film bareable. Overall its a very disapointing remake.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

4

AllisonJan 8, 2011

What I loved: Matt Damon, the cinematography, the premise. What I liked: Jeff Bridges. What I didn't like: the incredibly slow story and the one-note main character (Mattie Ross). What confuses me: why this movie is getting such rave reviews.What I loved: Matt Damon, the cinematography, the premise. What I liked: Jeff Bridges. What I didn't like: the incredibly slow story and the one-note main character (Mattie Ross). What confuses me: why this movie is getting such rave reviews. I suggest seeing it as a rental.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

4

VypurrJan 11, 2011

I didn't really like this movie. Jeff Bridges voice was annoying (too much groveling in his voice), and the scenery looked pretty bland (no vibrant sky colors or grass colors). The town scenes looked unauthentic and it seems as if some of theI didn't really like this movie. Jeff Bridges voice was annoying (too much groveling in his voice), and the scenery looked pretty bland (no vibrant sky colors or grass colors). The town scenes looked unauthentic and it seems as if some of the background was intentionally a bit off or blurry, so someone wouldn't focus on it I suppose. The girl, Maggie spoke too sophisticated for a 14 year old, and seemed too rehearsed at times. The old vigilante cowboys even seemed to speak this way at times, and it came off as unauthentic. Maggie looked mixed race (white/black) and I'm wondering if this was intentional to appeal to a wider audience? I definitely don't think that was the "norm" in the 1800's. Whole thing seemed unauthentic and stiff. Thumbs down on the scenery and acting. Definitely didn't hold up to the original. A much better western is The Quick and the Dead with Sharon Stone and Gene Hackman. Hackman was born to play a cowboy and the scenery is perfect for that era and there was so much put into the visual effects of this movie.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

4

BlitzcragJun 11, 2011

First, no action. Instead, this 14 year old girl talks the entire time. Matt Damon doesn't do anything for the entire film and Bridges just walks around with an indiscernible southern accent.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

s053714Jun 13, 2011

Compared to the John Wayne original, this version was so very ordinary. Where the original had great scenery, music, acting and scriptwriting, this new version is very dull. Jeff Bridges and Matt Damon are fine actors but their lines areCompared to the John Wayne original, this version was so very ordinary. Where the original had great scenery, music, acting and scriptwriting, this new version is very dull. Jeff Bridges and Matt Damon are fine actors but their lines are very wooden and unemotional - a sign of poor direction. The girl was pretty good but she couldn't save the movie. Although the original is one of my favorite movies, I truly saw this version with an open mind, and didn't much care for it. Why is this movie so highly regarded ? I'm sorry but I think the Coen's are greatly overrated.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

4

SpunkyMonkeySep 4, 2012

Another one of those movies with some nice ideas and good moments, but which doesn't gel cohesively enough to work as an overall package. Pacing wise it drags in parts and, as potentially interesting as the characters are, they never quiteAnother one of those movies with some nice ideas and good moments, but which doesn't gel cohesively enough to work as an overall package. Pacing wise it drags in parts and, as potentially interesting as the characters are, they never quite fulfill their potential. I had to watch the movie with subtitles on because of Bridge's indecipherable accent too, and it did take something away from the movie. Get the original instead.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

hanneguacamoleJun 9, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I'm glad I never have to watch True Grit again. It just really was not my style at all. Mattie's father was killed, and in a way this is her coming-of-age story and one of her defining life moments even if it doesn't go the way as planned. Originally Mattie does seem like a parent to me because of her tremendous responsibility of actually finding her father's murderer and the way she orders the men Cogburn and LaBoeuf around to do what she wants.

One of the highlights of the movie for me was the scenery and costumes. Even if they were not completely right, the were very convincing as to the period and I felt almost like I was in that time period. It's also a great movie for watching the progression of relationships. Both the men treat her like a child at the start (like beating her which disgusted me) but eventually came to respect her.

As for my problems with the movie, the journey to find Tom Chaney was very unclear. We met people (and killed) those that I had no idea who they were and just saw a bunch of scenes of shooting and horses and I was totally lost and uninterested. This movie was also quite misogynistic in the way that Mattie was practically the only female in the movie even though it was about her. She also has to earn her respect, which no one else has to do and I hate this gender role. In general it was also too gruesome for me. I hated the shooting, the killing, and really the violence that I didn't understand. It was really unrealistic.

Cogburn and LaBoeuf go through their struggles with helping Mattie as well. They take turns, reverse roles, but at the end are there for her and she remembers them fondly in her old age so their mistreatment didn't really phase her in the end. I did come to realize that Mattie truly was the only one withe true grit though. She was strong in the face of adversity as a 14 year old and the only real hero throughout. I did like the way the movie ended with a grown-up version of Mattie though. Brought the relationships with Cogburn and LaBoeuf full circle and closure. Ultimately the movie was too serious for me and I just didn't enjoy it. Could have been worse.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

podriscoll27Jan 28, 2011

Sucked. It is over-hyped, badly predictable, easily forgettable, utterly missable. Don't bother with it.

_______________________________________________________________________________

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

3

monkeymanDec 22, 2010

Jeff Bridges and Matt Damon were really great in this movie. However everything else was bad and boring. Characters would talk about things that had nothing to do with the plot or development of the story. When I went into this movie iJeff Bridges and Matt Damon were really great in this movie. However everything else was bad and boring. Characters would talk about things that had nothing to do with the plot or development of the story. When I went into this movie i thought i was there to see an action movie. What i saw was a bunch of cowboys talking about their crappy jobs and money. Even though the acting was good the characters that these great actors were made into were over all bad. The girl was whining the entire movie. And both Matt Damon's and Jeff Bridges characters were both boring and underdeveloped.… Expand

6 of 39 users found this helpful633

All this user's reviews

3

CinemanAug 1, 2012

I have to admit that, before watching the film, I wasn't a fan of the original and was surprised that anyone thought it deserving of a remake. The original was far too much of a comedy for what was supposed to be a revenge film and KimI have to admit that, before watching the film, I wasn't a fan of the original and was surprised that anyone thought it deserving of a remake. The original was far too much of a comedy for what was supposed to be a revenge film and Kim Darby's performance was far too cartoonish. I imagined that the Coens would probably go far in the other direction and create an extremely violent film that might better fit the theme of revenge.

I was surprised to see how little their vision differed from the original and how poor the acting was. Jeff Bridges played a caricature of all his recent performances and was unintelligible for long stretches. His chemistry with Maddy was non-existent, partially because she was again portrayed as a one-note "girl with spunk" rather than as a real character whose moods and reactions change with the action. If she's an interesting film character, it's because she's a young woman driven by physical revenge - not because she "spunky". I'm stunned by the critics' accolades for her performance, which was most notable for its unrealistic staccato line delivery, especially in her repartee with the horse dealer. I realize that, at 14, the Coens were responsible for her performance, but it was painful.

If there's ever been a less credible portrayal of a Texas Ranger than Matt Damon's, I thankfully haven't seen it, and wouldn't want to. I had the sense that he knew it wasn't working but couldn't back out in mid-film. His accent wavered by the minute. Though the role was as cartoonish as in the original, Glen Campbell captured the persona far better.

Though I almost missed Josh Brolin's performance because I occasionally have to blink, his 6 lines of dialogue were delivered with a bizarre, raspy growl for no apparent reason. (Matt Damon marvels at Brolin's inspired delivery in an accompanying commentary!)

Barry Pepper's performance is the best in the film, but even then it's bizarre to see him perfectly mimic Robert Duvall down to the voice. Again, as in so many points in the film, you just wonder "why bother"?

Though the original was far from a great film and far from Wayne's best, it was better than this remake. The original actors were better in their roles, and even Kim Darby's Maddy - cartoonish as I found her -shared an obvious affection for John Wayne that was glaringly missing from the remake.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

KivaJun 24, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. First of all I don't like westerns. When i first saw the trailer I thought that True grit is going to be my favorite movie. The trailer shocked me with action and passion but what i got after watching that film was nothing. Who would even think making that extremely boring film with no sense. It had a good script about the girl who wants to find the murderer who killed his father and i liked in the end that the girl cuts her arm. That's what i liked of this boring film. I give it 3 for the plot and the landscapes.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

2

JasonGoalieJan 9, 2011

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I know I'm going against the grain... I know this movie is well liked by critics and patrons alike... But after watching this movie, I feel like the enlightened one in a sea of gullible moviegoers! Can anyone else appreciate just how TERRIBLE this movie was? First: the script plays on screen like it was written by a school child. Sure, there's some witty one-liners and laugh-inducing reparte now and then, but in the context of a (supposedly) serious film, these parts of the dialogue transpire with the feel of a cheap David Spade movie... (not that there's anything wrong with David Spade movies, it just doesn't belong here). Second: certain scenes of this move are ABSOLUTE GARBAGE, and do nothing in the way of character development or plot advancement! The man in the tree who Rooster Cogburn "does not know"... The painfully awkward, random meeting with the medicine man in the bearskin... the inane, often incomprehensible ramblings of Cogburn... the lame-ass cornbread shooting contest... Do you need another four WORTHLESS scenes from this film? I'd be happy to list them. Third: I think it would be fair to say that this movie *attempts* to portray a special bond between Cogburn and the little girl, Mattie Ross. To steal a line from today's youth: EPIC FAIL. Jeff Bridges is a (usually) great actor, and Hailee Steinfeld seems like a wonderful young actress. But taken together, these two have the chemistry of oil and water... Summary thoughts: This movie is boring, hamstrung by hollywood cliches, rather poorly acted, INCREDIBLY poorly written, has a very uninspiring "gotcha, bad guy!" moment, and perhaps shouldn't have even been (re)made in the first place. The 2 points I have awarded are for the (surely unintentional) entertainment value derived from the aforementioned campy one-liners, and overdone, humor-inducing melodrama... Enjoy, but probably if you're over 70.… Expand

6 of 12 users found this helpful66

All this user's reviews

2

David_HDec 29, 2010

I'm old enough to have seen the original and its not just an issue of "why remake a John Wayne movie?". I have to give Jeff Bridges some credit, he certainly has skill. Matt Damon however seemed to be an odd casting choice and a bit awkwardI'm old enough to have seen the original and its not just an issue of "why remake a John Wayne movie?". I have to give Jeff Bridges some credit, he certainly has skill. Matt Damon however seemed to be an odd casting choice and a bit awkward in this kind of movie. Overall, the whole thing moved slow and therefore seemed to drag on. I left the theater feeling like I had wasted an afternoon and that there was no point in remaking this film. The original was excellent and this version brought nothing new.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

2

shaunmedJan 10, 2011

Huge fan of the Coens but this film is an ineffectual copy of the original classic. The story line is barely changed and for the worse i must say. There is no chemistry of kinship between any of the over acting actors who all fall prey to theHuge fan of the Coens but this film is an ineffectual copy of the original classic. The story line is barely changed and for the worse i must say. There is no chemistry of kinship between any of the over acting actors who all fall prey to the pitfall of their own stardom or that of the directors.… Expand

3 of 11 users found this helpful38

All this user's reviews

2

HEI5ENBERGFeb 13, 2011

Man I can't believe this movie is in the running for best picture at this years Oscar!!! This movie was so BORING and un-entertaining! The acting was OK at best. I found that I couldn't Jeff Bridges! The way the movie was filmed was like itMan I can't believe this movie is in the running for best picture at this years Oscar!!! This movie was so BORING and un-entertaining! The acting was OK at best. I found that I couldn't Jeff Bridges! The way the movie was filmed was like it was filmed in the early 60's! Nothing in this movie impressed me even the 11 years old girl, whose been given great reviews from the movies critics failed to impress me!

When you look at this movie on paper, you just can't wait to watch it. Jeff Bridges, Matt Damon, Josh Brolin stars, Cohen Brothers Direct! Gets your mouth watering! Trust me people this movie was very very boring!… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

2

LaMagiadeVirueAug 1, 2013

Una pobre, muy pobre remake de la versión original del 1969. Si esta bien, es buena la historia en partes, pero me quedo con la versión original de John Wayne.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

1

fantasyJan 9, 2011

This movie was awful. I am sorry I saw the original with John Wayne but this was a pointless boring piece of trash. It made absolutely no sense because you knew where this was going 5 minutes into the flick. The professional criticisThis movie was awful. I am sorry I saw the original with John Wayne but this was a pointless boring piece of trash. It made absolutely no sense because you knew where this was going 5 minutes into the flick. The professional criticis raving about this simply blows my mind. Just a waste of two hours.… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

1

enigma13Dec 25, 2010

You'll need "true grit" to get through this one. In a word - monotone. Slow pace, too much dialogue (monologues), gratuitous violence, poor editing. Scenes that should/could have been surprises were simply confusing because the film lackedYou'll need "true grit" to get through this one. In a word - monotone. Slow pace, too much dialogue (monologues), gratuitous violence, poor editing. Scenes that should/could have been surprises were simply confusing because the film lacked story development. We plodded from one ho-hum conversation to the next with a shot of violence dropped in now and then to [try to] break the monotony. I'm a major Coen brothers fan but afraid they missed the mark here. Spend your money if you need a nap.… Expand

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

1

LukeTravisDec 26, 2010

You can put frosting on a turd, but it doesn't make it a cupcake. This movie has no redeeming qualities. I went in with great expectations and came out shaking my head in disgust. Everything that made the original great is missing.You can put frosting on a turd, but it doesn't make it a cupcake. This movie has no redeeming qualities. I went in with great expectations and came out shaking my head in disgust. Everything that made the original great is missing. Bridges is no John Wayne. I never knew just how well Kim Darby and Glenn Campbell played their parts until I saw Hailee Steinfeld's and Matt Damon's performances. I have a collection of over 5,000 movies and there's no way I'd ever buy this turd.… Expand

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

1

davidp1045Dec 31, 2010

After reading all the glowing reviews from both critics and users on the website I was really expecting an amazing movie that would keep me entertained throughout. Instead, I was bored out of mind my for about 85% of the movie. The last tenAfter reading all the glowing reviews from both critics and users on the website I was really expecting an amazing movie that would keep me entertained throughout. Instead, I was bored out of mind my for about 85% of the movie. The last ten minutes were decent, and that's it. I do not recommend.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

1

DorrbeckerJan 23, 2011

Incredibly boring movie. Dull and pointless remake. I would much rather just watch the original. The Coens have sold out. I could only see bunch of pedophiles rating this movie so high.

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

1

xishnik100Feb 19, 2011

THis movie Bored me to death. Jeff Bridges had great acting, but thats about it. Plot was boring, storyline was boring, i dont really see how movie critics enjoyed this so much. Much to simple. All of these movie critics are just havingTHis movie Bored me to death. Jeff Bridges had great acting, but thats about it. Plot was boring, storyline was boring, i dont really see how movie critics enjoyed this so much. Much to simple. All of these movie critics are just having nostalgia from the older release of the movie.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

0

EthanPeterDec 27, 2010

Infuriatingly bad, it's the worst Oscar bait in years. The story's essentially a one-act play that's so boring I fell asleep. Thankfully(?) the characters are so hollow that I didn't care what happened to them. The dialogue is a mix ofInfuriatingly bad, it's the worst Oscar bait in years. The story's essentially a one-act play that's so boring I fell asleep. Thankfully(?) the characters are so hollow that I didn't care what happened to them. The dialogue is a mix of poorly delivered olde timey "urgency" and inane one-liners. It wasn't funny, suspenseful, insightful, thrilling, or engaging in any way aside from a few seconds of nice cinematography. It wasn't snubbed by the HFPA for Golden Globe nominations; they saw that it was a horrible crapfest of a movie totally worthy of zero accolades in exchange for the zero amount of entertainment it contained.… Expand

4 of 11 users found this helpful47

All this user's reviews

0

critical1Dec 25, 2010

Got to give it a "one" mostly for my errant expectations. Those who are looking for a typical Coen brothers film will be very disapointed. Terrific acting by Jeff Bridges although he does seem to reprising his previous role in "Crazy Heart."Got to give it a "one" mostly for my errant expectations. Those who are looking for a typical Coen brothers film will be very disapointed. Terrific acting by Jeff Bridges although he does seem to reprising his previous role in "Crazy Heart." Matt Damon is unrecognizable and wasted. Hailie Steinfield is getting rave reviews and it is hard to understand why. She appears to be acting in every scene. Merely a good straight-ahead western. The Coen Brothers should go back to making Coen brothers movies unless they are getting worn out and lacking the true grit necessary for inspiration..… Expand

2 of 12 users found this helpful210

All this user's reviews

0

marco34laJan 1, 2011

This movie sucked for the first hour!! It was about as exciting and interesting as a heinz ketchup commercial. The last hour was okay. Overall, I'd say skip it. If you want to see a movie where they put adult words in children's mouths...This movie sucked for the first hour!! It was about as exciting and interesting as a heinz ketchup commercial. The last hour was okay. Overall, I'd say skip it. If you want to see a movie where they put adult words in children's mouths... then go see 'Kick Ass" instead. A precocious 14 yr girl just doesn't work. Damon and Brolin are just supporting roles... so don't go for them. In case you're wondering... I loved 'No Country for Old Men". This movie was a HUGE disappointment.… Expand

2 of 11 users found this helpful29

All this user's reviews

0

MrMooveyFeb 13, 2011

This was a waste of time. The original was a classic western. This was a weak attempt to recreate
True Grit. The characters were forgettable, the story was drawn out, the performances were okay but compared to the classic, in every case thisThis was a waste of time. The original was a classic western. This was a weak attempt to recreate
True Grit. The characters were forgettable, the story was drawn out, the performances were okay but compared to the classic, in every case this came up short.. This may have been the worst movie I have
seen in a long time. i usually pride myself on seeing quality movies. Maybe the rent was due......… Expand

1 of 8 users found this helpful17

All this user's reviews

True Grit

User Reviews